Search

Background: In-season return to play after anterior glenohumeral instability is associated with high rates of recurrent instability and the need for surgical stabilization. We are not aware of previous studies that have investigated in-season return to play after posterior glenohumeral instability; furthermore, as posterior shoulder instability in collision athletes occurs frequently, understanding the expected outcome of in-season athletes may improve the ability of physicians to provide athletes with a better understanding of the expected outcome of their injury and their ability to return to sport., Questions/purposes: (1) What proportion of athletes returned to play during the season after posterior instability in collegiate football players? (2) How much time did athletes lose to injury, what proportion of athletes opted to undergo surgery, and what proportion of athletes experienced recurrent instability after a posterior instability episode during a collegiate football season?, Methods: A multicenter, prospective, observational study of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division 1 Football Bowl Subdivision athletes was performed at three US Military Service Academies. Ten athletes who sustained a posterior instability event during the regular football season and who pursued a course of nonoperative treatment were identified and prospectively observed through the subsequent season. All athletes in the observed cohort attempted an initial course of nonoperative treatment during the season. All athletes sustained subluxation events initially identified through history and physical examination at the time of injury. None of the athletes sustained a dislocation event requiring a manual reduction. Intraarticular pathology consisting of posterior labral pathology was further subsequently identified in all subjects via MRI arthrogram. Return to play was the primary outcome of interest. Time lost to injury, surgical intervention, and subsequent instability were secondary outcomes., Results: Of the 10 athletes who opted for a trial of initial nonoperative management, seven athletes were able to return to play during the same season. Although these seven athletes returned within 1 week of their injury (median of 1 day), 5 of 7 athletes sustained recurrent subluxation events with a median (range) of four subluxation events per athlete (0 to 8) during the remainder of the season. Seven athletes were treated surgically after the completion of their season, four of whom returned to football., Conclusion: This study suggests that although collegiate football players are able to return to in-season sport after a posterior glenohumeral instability event, they will likely sustain multiple recurrent instability events and undergo surgery after the season is completed. The results of this study can help guide in-season management of posterior shoulder instability by allowing more appropriate postinjury counseling and decision making through the identification of those athletes who may require additional attention from medical staff during the season and possible modifications to training regimens to minimize long-term disability. Further prospective studies involving a larger cohort over several seasons should be performed through collaborative studies across the NCAA that better assess function and injury risk factors before beginning collegiate athletics. This would better characterize the natural history and associated functional limitations that athletes may encounter during their collegiate careers., Level of Evidence: Level IV, prognostic study., Competing Interests: All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2020 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: The present study evaluated the functional and radiographic outcomes of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction performed using the mini-open technique and a knotless suspensory loop device METHODS:: A total of 25 patients (20 male and 5 female patients; mean age, 30.7 years; standard deviation, 10 years; range, 17-57 years) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. A functional assessment was performed using the Constant and University of California Los Angeles score. The radiologic assessment included standard anterior-posterior views of the AC and coracoclavicular (CC) distances., Results: The mean follow-up period was 18.6 months (range, 12-23 months). The mean Constant score was 87.2 ± 3.2, and the mean University of California Los Angeles score was 30.1 ± 2.4 at the final follow-up. Radiological evaluation at the last follow-up of the patients: Although there was no statistically significant increase in the AC and CC values of the patients () at the last follow-up, the average CC value in 6 (24%) of the 25 patients was greater than 50% compared with the unaffected side CC and early postoperative CC values. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the Constant and UCLA scores between the 6 patients with reduction loss and the 19 patients with reduction maintenance (P = .86)., Conclusions: Clinical results of fixation of acute AC joint dislocations using the ZipTight knotless suspensory loop device system and mini-open technique were favorable in terms of functional recovery and pain relief. However, the major disadvantage of this method was radiological loss of AC joint reduction when compared to the contralateral shoulder.

Background: It has been biomechanically demonstrated that 20% to 25% is a critical glenoid bone loss. Recently, there are several reports describing that a bone loss less than 20% to 25% needed to be treated because patients may have decreased quality of life without recurrent instability events. The purpose of this study was to clarify the presence of subcritical bone loss that would affect postoperative instability or quality of life., Methods: Subjects were 43 patients aged≤40years with less than 25% glenoid bone loss who had undergone arthroscopic Bankart repair. These patients were assessed at a mean follow-up of 32months. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) and Rowe scores were used for the clinical evaluation. Patients were divided in 3 groups based on the percentage of bone loss: group 1: <8%; group 2: 8% to 17%; and group 3: >17%., Results: The recurrence rate was 7% (3/43 shoulders). A weak negative correlation was seen between bone loss and sports/recreation/work domain of the WOSI score (r=-0.304, p=0.0191). The WOSI for group 3 was significantly lower than that for group 1 and 2 (p=0.0009). The male WOSI scores were significantly lower than the female ones (p=0.0471). The WOSI scores of the contact athletes were significantly lower than those of non-contact athletes (p=0.0275). All the patients in Group 3 were males and participated in contact sports., Conclusion: Glenoid bone loss between 17% and 25% is considered to be a "subcritical bone loss" in our series, especially in male patients who are involved in sports or high-level activities., Level of Evidence: III, retrospective study., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The Latarjet is a successful primary and revision option for anterior shoulder instability. However, recent reports have highlighted varying complication rates. Our study prospectively collected clinical, functional and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing the procedure. Forty-eight consecutive patients (fifty shoulders) underwent the Latarjet procedure in a single UK centre. Clinical, radiological and functional follow-up was performed. Mean clinical follow-up was 32 months and radiological follow-up 20 months. 95% shoulders were subjectively graded "excellent" or "good" and 5% "fair". Mean Rowe, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, American Shoulder and Elbow selfassessment Score and Subjective Shoulder Value Score all improved post-operatively (p<0.001). No infections, dislocations, revisions or metalworkrelated complications occurred. There was one intra-operative coracoid fracture and five transient neurological injuries, resolving within three months. The long-term complication rate was 2%. The Latarjet procedure is safe and reliable for treating anterior shoulder instability with a very low long-term complication rate providing excellent clinical and functional outcomes.

Introduction: The Cunningham technique has been shown to be an effective and simple method to reduce a dislocated shoulder. It is based on the theory that the humeral head remains outside the glenoid fossa due to tension in the long biceps tendon. In the beginning of 2013 doctors at the emergency department in Landspitali University Hospital (LUH) in Reykjavik were instructed in the Cunningham method for reduction of anterior dislocation without sedation. The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of its induction with regards to number of attempts, successful relocations, sedation, use of analgesics and length of stay in the ED., Material and Methods: We searched our electronic database for patients coming to the ED in LUH in 2012 and 2013 with anterior shoulder dislocation. Information was obtained on age and gender, the ED length of stay, first to fourth attempted methods of reduction, medications given for pain relief and sedation and whether this was the first dislocation or not. We used descriptive statistics and comparing the two groups we used independent sample t-test or chi-square to calculate the p-value., Results: During the study period, a reduction was attempted on 190 patients with a shoulder dislocation with 95% of dislocations successfully reduced in the ED. The proportion of patients on which the Cunningham method was applied on first attempt increased from 1% to 27% between years. Average number of attempts was 1.15 in the first year and 1.38 the second year (p = 0.002). The proportion of successful first attempts fell from 81.6% to 66% (p = 0.016) but successful relocation in the emergency department after all attempts was 93.1% and 97.1%, respectively (p = 0,305). The duration of treatment was similar between years or 226 and 219 minutes (p = 0,839). Sedation ratio decreased from 85.1% to 73.8% (p = 0.024) and use of analgesics was similar between years, 70.6% and 69.6% (p = 0.843)., Conclusion: Induction of the Cunningham method resulted in a significant reduction in the need for sedation. It reduced the rate of successful relocations in the first attempt and increased the number of attempts to but had no effect on the length of stay in the emergency room or the overall rate of successful relocations. Key words: Cunningham, shoulder, dislocation, reduction Correspondence: Hjalti Mar Bjornsson hjaltimb@landspitali.is.

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of arthroscopic and open Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation using meta-analysis of data from clinical trials., Materials and Methods: Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, PUBMED and EMBASE were used to search and identify clinical trials that evaluated arthroscopic and open Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. Methodological qualities of studies were assessed by Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Publication bias was detected using Begg's test and Egger's test., Results: Sixteen trials involving 827 shoulders were included in the study. Based on Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias, three studies were rated as high quality and one study was rated as moderate quality among the randomized controlled trials. Another twelve case-control studies were rated as high quality based on Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. No significant publication bias was detected by Begg's test or Egger's test. Meta-analysis results indicated that arthroscopic repair has a significantly better recovery rate for external rotation at 90° of abduction, external rotation at side (P > 0.05) and forward flexion. However, arthroscopic repair had higher rates of recurrence and reoperation than open Bankart repair., Conclusion: Meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials and case-control studies demonstrated that arthroscopic repair and open Bankart repair were similar in safety. Arthroscopic repair resulted in better recovery of range of motion, but recurrence and reoperation rates were higher than open Bankart repair.

Simultaneous bilateral locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder is a rare injury. Herein, we present a 59-year-old male case with a three-month history of an irreducible locked bilateral posterior dislocation of the shoulders with an associated large impression fracture on the anteromedial aspect of both humeral heads after a grand mal type epileptic seizure. Plain X-ray and computed tomograph revealed a defect on the right side more than 40% of the articular surface, and on the left side, 30%. He was treated with a one-stage operation with a reconstruction of femoral head osteochondral allograft on the right side and transfer of the osteotomized tuberculum minus with its attached subscapularis tendon into the defect (modified McLaughlin technique) on the left side. At 14 months during follow-up, the patient was pain-free with stable shoulder joints and satisfactory functionality.

Purpose: Conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials directly comparing (1) the rates of recurrence and (2) patient-based quality-of-life assessments after the external rotation (ER) or internal rotation (IR) immobilisation after primary anterior shoulder dislocation., Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and ISI Web of Science were searched up to January 2013, using the Boolean operators as follows: (bankart lesion OR shoulder anterior dislocation) AND ((external rotation AND internal rotation) OR immobilisation). All prospective randomised controlled trials directly comparing recurrence rate and patient-based quality-of-life assessments between the ER and IR immobilisations were retrieved. No limitation of the language or publication year existed in our analysis., Results: Seven of 896 studies involving 663 patients were included, 338 in the ER group and 325 in the IR group. No significant difference was observed in the recurrence rate at all ages (risk ratio (RR)=0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.03; p=0.067), at the age stratum of ≤30 years (RR=0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.29; p=0.250) and >30 years (RR=0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.97; p=0.722). Four trials adopted quality-of-life assessments, using the Constant-Murlay functional scoring system, the Rowe scoring system, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index (WOSI), the Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons evaluation form (ASES). Only one trial demonstrated borderline statistical significance (p=0.05) and probable superiority of the ER group based on the ASES. No significant difference was observed in other three trials., Conclusion: Based on the results of our analysis, the ER immobilisation could not reduce the rates of recurrence after primary anterior shoulder dislocation or improve the quality of life compared with the IR immobilisation. More rigorous and adequately powered prospective randomised controlled trials with long-term follow-ups are required to elucidate a more objective outcome., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The traditional treatment for primary anterior shoulder dislocations has been immobilization in a sling with the arm in a position of adduction and internal rotation. However, recent basic science and clinical data have suggested recurrent instability may be reduced with immobilization in external rotation after primary shoulder dislocation., Questions/purposes: We performed a randomized controlled trial to compare the (1) frequency of recurrent instability and (2) disease-specific quality-of-life scores after treatment of first-time shoulder dislocation using either immobilization in external rotation or immobilization in internal rotation in a group of young patients., Methods: Sixty patients younger than 35 years of age with primary, traumatic, anterior shoulder dislocations were randomized (concealed, computer-generated) to immobilization with either an internal rotation sling (n = 29) or an external rotation brace (n = 31) at a mean of 4 days after closed reduction (range, 1-7 days). Patients with large bony lesions or polytrauma were excluded. The two groups were similar at baseline. Both groups were immobilized for 4 weeks with identical therapy protocols thereafter. Blinded assessments were completed by independent observers for a minimum of 12 months (mean, 25 months; range, 12-43 months). Recurrent instability was defined as a second documented anterior dislocation or multiple episodes of shoulder subluxation severe enough for the patient to request surgical stabilization. Validated disease-specific quality-of-life data (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index [WOSI], American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons evaluation [ASES]) were also collected. Ten patients (17%, five from each group) were lost to followup. Reported compliance with immobilization in both groups was excellent (80%)., Results: With the numbers available, there was no difference in the rate of recurrent instability between groups: 10 of 27 patients (37%) with the external rotation brace versus 10 of 25 patients (40%) with the sling redislocated or developed symptomatic recurrent instability (p = 0.41). WOSI scores were not different between groups (p = 0.74) and, although the difference in ASES scores approached statistical significance (p = 0.05), the magnitude of this difference was small and of uncertain clinical importance., Conclusions: Despite previous published findings, our results show immobilization in external rotation did not confer a significant benefit versus sling immobilization in the prevention of recurrent instability after primary anterior shoulder dislocation. Further studies with larger numbers may elucidate whether functional outcomes, compliance, or comfort with immobilization can be improved with this device., Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Recurrent shoulder instability is commonly associated with Hill-Sachs defects. These defects may engage the glenoid rim, contributing to glenohumeral dislocation. Two treatment options to manage engaging Hill-Sachs defects are the remplissage procedure, which fills the defect with soft tissue, and the Latarjet procedure, which increases glenoid arc length. Little evidence exists to support one over the other., Questions/purposes: We performed a biomechanical comparison of the remplissage procedure to the traditional Latarjet coracoid transfer for management of engaging Hill-Sachs defects in terms of joint stiffness (resistance to anterior translation), ROM, and frequency of dislocation., Methods: Eight cadaveric specimens were tested on a shoulder instability simulator. Testing was performed with a 25% Hill-Sachs defect with an intact glenoid and after remplissage and Latarjet procedures. Joint stiffness, internal-external rotation ROM, and frequency of dislocation were assessed. Additionally, horizontal extension ROM was measured in composite glenohumeral abduction., Results: After remplissage, stiffness increased in adduction with neutral rotation (12.7 ± 3.7 N/mm) relative to the Hill-Sachs defect state (8.7 ± 3.3 N/mm; p = 0.016). The Latarjet procedure did not affect joint stiffness (p = 1.0). Internal-external rotation ROM was reduced in abduction after the Latarjet procedure (49° ± 14°) compared with the Hill-Sachs defect state (69° ± 17°) (p = 0.009). Horizontal extension was reduced after remplissage (16° ± 12°) relative to the Hill-Sachs defect state (34° ± 8°) (p = 0.038). With the numbers available, there was no difference between the procedures in terms of the frequency of dislocation after reconstruction: 84% of specimens (27 of 32 testing scenarios) stabilized after remplissage, while 94% of specimens (30 of 32 testing scenarios) stabilized after the Latarjet procedure., Conclusions: Both procedures proved effective in reducing the frequency of dislocation in a 25% Hill-Sachs defect model, while neither procedure consistently altered joint stiffness., Clinical Relevance: In the treatment of shoulder instability with a humeral head bone defect and an intact glenoid rim, this study supports the use of both the remplissage and Latarjet procedures. Clinical studies and larger cadaveric studies powered to detect differences in instability rates are needed to evaluate these procedures in terms of their comparative efficacy at preventing dislocation, as any differences between them seem likely to be small.

The purpose of this report was to investigate whether a subject with anterior shoulder instability exhibited better active shoulder position sense and 3-dimensional (3-D) reaching accuracy after a surgical repair. The 19-year-old male subject underwent an open Bankart repair procedure for his left shoulder followed by a standardized post-operative rehabilitation program. Shoulder position sense was examined with traditional passive matching and active positioning protocols. Reaching accuracy in space with the unrestricted arm motion was also examined. The subject was tested 5 months prior to the surgery and re-tested 6 months after the surgery. With the traditional passive matching protocol, shoulder position sense improved <2° after surgery. However, shoulder position sense improved greatly after surgery with active shoulder abduction (up to 4.25°) and active shoulder rotation (up to 5.87°) testing protocols. In addition, reaching accuracy also greatly improved after surgery (up to 10.97 cm) with the most significant improvement when reaching to targets located in the frontal plane. Data suggest that anterior shoulder repair with rehabilitation can improve both active shoulder position sense and reaching accuracy, especially in shoulder positions involving abduction with external rotation.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro biomechanical study was to assess the effects of the remplissage procedure for small- and large-sized Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) on shoulder range of motion (ROM) with a special interest in the apprehension position., Methods: HSLs of 50% and 100% of the glenoid width were simulated in 7 cadaveric shoulders as small and large lesions, respectively, and the postoperative condition was reproduced by placing suture anchors on the articular surface and tying down the infraspinatus at the medial edge of the would-be lesion site. ROMs were measured in abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation with the humerus in the adducted and abducted position. In addition, the ROM was measured in the anterior apprehension position, in which 2 torques of external rotation and extension were applied simultaneously, and external rotation and horizontal extension ROMs were measured with the humerus in different abduction angles (20°, 40°, and 60°)., Results: For standard ROMs, the procedure for the 50% HSL maintained complete ROMs, whereas the procedure for the 100% HSL significantly decreased external rotation ROM with the humerus in both the adducted and abducted positions, as well as abduction ROM. In the apprehension position, remplissage for the 50% HSL decreased extension ROM with the humerus abducted to 40° and 60°. Remplissage for the 100% HSL significantly decreased both external and extension ROMs regardless of the humeral abduction angle., Conclusions: In the cadaveric model with an intact humeral head and the simulated postoperative condition, the remplissage procedure for a large HSL caused significant restrictions in ROM of abduction in the scapular plane and external rotation with the humerus in both adduction and abduction. It also caused significant restrictions in both external rotation and extension ROMs in the apprehension position., Clinical Relevance: The indication for the remplissage procedure for the larger HSL should be considered carefully, especially for the competitive throwing athlete who needs exceptional external rotation ROM for optimal overhead throwing performance., (Copyright © 2014 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We report our clinical experience using the modified Cadenat method to treat acromioclavicular joint dislocation, and discuss the usefulness of this method. This study examined 6 shoulders in 6 patients (5 males, 1 female) who were diagnosed with acromioclavicular joint dislocation and treated with the modified Cadenat method at our hospital. Average age at onset was 49.3 years (26-78 years), average time interval from injury until surgery was 263.8 days (10 to 1100 days), and the average follow-up period was 21.7 months (12 to 42 months). Post-operative assessment was performed using plain radiographs to determine shoulder joint dislocation rate and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. The average post-operative JOA score was 94.1 points (91 to 100 points). The acromioclavicular joint dislocation rate improved from 148.7% (72 to 236%) before surgery to 28.6% (0 to 60%) after surgery. Conservative treatment has been reported to achieve good outcomes in acromioclavicular joint dislocations. However, many patients also experience chronic pain or a sensation of fatigue upon putting the extremity in an elevated posture, and therefore ensuring the stability of the acromioclavicular joint is crucial for highly active patients. In this study, we treated acromioclavicular joint dislocations by the modified Cadenat method, and were able to achieve favorable outcomes.

The glenohumeral joint is an inherently unstable joint that relies on the interaction of the dynamic and static stabilizers to maintain stability. Disruption of this interplay or poor development of any of these factors may result in instability, pain, and a loss of function. Rehabilitation will vary based on the type of instability present and the key principles described. Whether a course of nonoperative rehabilitation is followed or the patient presents postoperatively, a comprehensive program designed to establish full ROM and balance capsular mobility, in addition to maximizing muscular strength, endurance, proprioception, dynamic stability, and neuromuscular control is essential. A functional approach to rehabilitation using movement patterns and sport-specific positions along with an interval sport program will allow a gradual return to athletics. The focus of the program should minimize the risk of recurrence and ensure that the patient can safely return to functional activities., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Identification and treatment of the osseous lesions associated with complex shoulder instability remains challenging. Further biomechanical testing is required to delineate critical defect values and determine which treatments provide improved glenohumeral joint stability for the various defect sizes, while minimizing the associated complications., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Conventional capsulolabral reconstruction for anterior shoulder instability fails with recurrent instability in up to 23% of cases. Few studies have evaluated surgical revision strategies and outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes in a homogeneous series of surgical revisions after selective capsular repair (SCR)., Hypothesis: Observed anatomic lesions can guide the choice between repeat SCR and coracoid transfer (Latarjet procedure)., Materials and Methods: From January 2005 to January 2009, 11 patients with trauma-related recurrent anterior shoulder instability (episodes of subluxation and/or dislocation) after SCR were included. Mean age was 31 years (range, 19-45 years). At revision, a glenoid bony defect was present in six patients. Repeat SCR was performed in five patients and coracoid transfer in six patients., Results: After a mean follow-up of 40 months (range, 24-65 months), no patient had experienced further episodes of instability. However, four patients had a positive apprehension test. External rotation decreased significantly by more than 20° after both techniques. The Simple Shoulder Test, Walch-Duplay, and Rowe scores were 10.5, 79, and 85, respectively. No patient had a subscapularis tear. Of these 11 patients, nine were able to resume their sporting activities and eight reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the subjective outcome. Radiographs showed fibrous non-union of the coracoid transfer in one patient., Conclusion: In patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability after SCR, repeat SCR and coracoid transfer produce similarly satisfactory outcomes. The size of the glenoid bone defect may be the best criterion for choosing between these two procedures. However, open revision surgery may decrease the range of motion, most notably in external rotation., Level of Evidence: Level IV., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The usual mechanism of anterior shoulder dislocation is widely believed to be a combination of glenohumeral joint abduction, extension, and external rotation forces, even though no published reports to date have investigated the arm position of anterior shoulder dislocation in detail. Understanding the exact position of anterior shoulder dislocations is important for the management of anterior shoulder instability., Materials and Methods: The study included 40 shoulders of 38 patients (32 males, 6 females), aged 28.0 (range, 13-73) years with symptomatic post-traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability. While patients were under general anesthesia, but before shoulder-stabilizing surgery, we evaluated the angle of external rotation with 90° elevation in the scapular plane at which the humeral head showed anterior translations over the glenoid rim., Results: The center of anterior instability at 90° elevation in the scapular plane was at 25.9° of external rotation. Anterior translations were detected in the range of 3.4° of internal rotation to 55.1° of external rotation, and no shoulders (except one) showed anterior translation at maximal external rotation., Conclusions: Gross anterior translation was seen in the middle range of rotation at approximately 25° of external rotation, and anterior translation decreased close to the end of external and internal rotation. Shoulders with grade III translation showed anterior translation in a wider range of rotation, especially in external rotation. These data will help to further our understanding of the management and the prevention of anterior shoulder dislocations., (Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neer modified the Bankart procedure by combining a superoinferior capsular shift with the labral reattachment. The theoretical advantages of the modification were that such a procedure would restore the patient's anatomy and also treat the repeated capsular stretching encountered in anteroinferior instability without limiting external rotation and, thereby reducing the risk of arthritis., Questions/purposes: We therefore determined: (1) the rate of recurrent instability after this modification, (2) patient function, and (3) the incidence and stage of glenohumeral osteoarthritis at greater than 2 years followup in patients with traumatic anteroinferior instability., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all 64 patients (average age, 27 years) who had the modified Bankart procedure for recurrent dislocations (n = 39) or subluxation (n = 25) from 1991 to 1997. The labrum was reattached with suture anchors and a superoinferior capsular shift was added. We determined the rate of recurrent instability, Rowe and Walch-Duplay scores and shoulder ROM, and the presence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (modified Samilson and Prieto classification). The minimum followup was 24 months (median, 40 months; range, 24-120 months)., Results: Recurrent instability occurred in seven of the 64 patients (11%) at an average of 25 months postoperatively (range, 7 days to 6 years); in six patients the recurrence was associated with trauma; five of the six patients underwent reoperation with a Latarjet procedure. Eight additional patients (13%) presented with persistent shoulder apprehension or discomfort. The average Rowe score was 83% (range, 20-100%) and average Walch-Duplay score 83% (range, 15-100%). However, only 36 of 64 (56%) patients could return to the same sport at the same level. The loss of external rotation was 13° compared with the contralateral side. Glenohumeral osteoarthritis incidence increased from 4% preoperatively to 17% postoperatively., Conclusions: The open Bankart procedure modified by Neer provided high function scores but a relatively low rate of return to sport and high rate of recurrent instability. Our rate of recurrent instability, similar to that obtained with arthroscopic Bankart procedures, has prompted us to abandon the open procedure.

The Latarjet procedure may be performed with both subscapularis splitting and subscapularis transecting approaches. The subscapularis splitting approach may better preserve subscapularis function and anatomy. The goal of this study was to determine the functional status of the subscapularis after the Latarjet procedure with a subscapularis splitting approach using the quantified belly press test. Thirty patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent a Latarjet procedure through a subscapularis splitting approach. Both operative and nonoperative extremities were tested preoperatively with a belly press test using an Isobex muscle strength analyzer (Medical Device Solutions AG, Oberburg, Switzerland). Fifteen patients returned for postoperative Isobex belly press testing at a minimum of 6 months. Average patient age was 23.3 years, and average follow-up interval was 13 months. We detected no significant differences in pre- vs postoperative subscapularis strength in the surgical shoulder (decreased by 0.3 kg [95% CI, -1.0 to 1.7 kg; P=.630]). There was no difference in control vs surgical arm at preoperative (control +0.3 kg stronger; 95% CI, -0.8 to 0.1 kg; P=.124) vs postoperative (control +0.3 kg stronger; 95% CI, -1.1 to 0.5 kg; P=.444) measurements. Neither sex (P=.593) nor surgery in the dominant arm (P=.459) had an effect on recovery of subscapularis strength. Finally, the surgical arm at follow-up was not significantly different from reported height- and weight-based normative values for either men (P=.481) or women (P=.298). This study suggests that subscapularis strength is not significantly altered by the Latarjet procedure with a subscapularis splitting approach., (Copyright 2010, SLACK Incorporated.)

Background: To evaluate the clinical results and operation technique of arthroscopic repair of combined Bankart and superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions, all of which had an anterior-inferior Bankart lesion that continued superiorly to include separation of the biceps anchor in the patients presenting recurrent shoulder dislocations., Methods: From May 2003 to January 2006, we reviewed 15 cases with combined Bankart and SLAP lesions among 62 patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations who underwent arthroscopic repair. The average age at surgery was 24.2 years (range, 16 to 38 years), with an average follow-up period of 15 months (range, 13 to 28 months). During the operation, we repaired the unstable SLAP lesion first with absorbable suture anchors and then also repaired Bankart lesion from the inferior to superior fashion. We analyzed the preoperative and postoperative results by visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) and Rowe shoulder scoring systems. We compared the results with the isolated Bankart lesion., Results: VAS for pain was decreased from preoperative 4.9 to postoperative 1.9. Mean ASES and Rowe shoulder scores were improved from preoperative 56.4 and 33.7 to postoperative 91.8 and 94.1, respectively. There were no specific complication and no significant limitation of motion more than 10 degree at final follow-up. We found the range of motions after the arthroscopic repair in combined lesions were gained more slowly than in patients with isolated Bankart lesions., Conclusions: In recurrent dislocation of the shoulder with combined Bankart and SLAP lesion, arthroscopic repair using absorbable suture anchors produced favorable clinical results. Although it has technical difficulty, the concomitant unstable SLAP lesion should be repaired in a manner that stabilizes the glenohumeral joint, as the Bankart lesion can be repaired if the unstable SLAP lesion is repaired first.

Posterior dislocations of the glenohumeral joint are extremely rare (2-4% of all shoulder dislocations) and often associated with bone or ligamentary injuries. Though the reverse Hill-Sachs lesion is a common injury associated with posterior shoulder dislocation, there have been only few articles describing specific treatments for this type of humeral head defect. This article describes the successful operative treatment of an acute locked posterior shoulder dislocation by reconstructing the articular surface of the humeral head with the use of autologous bone graft taken from the iliac crest. The patient was doing quite well with no complaints, good range of shoulder motion and no recurrence of posterior shoulder dislocation despite several epileptic seizures, 1.5 years after surgical reconstruction of the anatomy of the humeral head. His right shoulder function revealed to be "excellent" or "good", assessed with an absolute Constant Score of 76 points and a relative Score of 88% when compared with an age- and sex-matched normal population.

The specific aims of this experiment were (1) to develop a clinically relevant model of anteroinferior shoulder dislocation in the apprehension position to compare the biomechanics of the intact anterior capsuloligamentous structures, and (2) to evaluate the initial strength of an open Bankart and of a coracoid abutment procedure. Fifteen shoulders from deceased donors were used. For the intact shoulders, mean peak load was 486 N, and stiffness was 26,7 N/mm. For the Bankart repair, the mean peak load was 264 N, and mean stiffness was 14.1 N/mm. Transosseous repairs failed by suture pullout through soft tissues. For the coracoid abutment repair, the mean peak load was 607 N and stiffness was 25.57 N/mm. This study reveals that the biomechanical performance of the Bankart and coracoid abutment repairs fails to reproduce the properties of the natural intact state.

Purpose: To determine the effect of coracoacromial ligament (CAL) resection and subacromial decompression (SAD)/acromioplasty on humeral head translation under anterosuperior and superior loading in a cadaveric model with an intact rotator cuff., Methods: Six cadaveric shoulders were tested in the intact state, following CAL resection and following SAD., Results: Excision of the CAL led to a significant increase in anterosuperior humeral translation of 2.1 mm (17%). SAD led to a significant increase in superior humeral translation of 2.5 mm (28%)., Conclusions: The results of this cadaveric study showed that resection of the CAL led to a 2.1-mm increase in anterosuperior translation and that SAD led to a 2.5-mm increase in superior translation., Clinical Relevance: CAL resection and SAD are common surgical procedures, which may lead to increases in anterosuperior and superior glenohumeral instability.

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are devastating and management is complex. Treatment involves a multidisciplinary approach. Primary reconstruction involves nerve repair, grafting, and transfer techniques. Secondary reconstruction includes microneurovascular free-functioning muscle transfer, tendon transfers, and arthrodesis to improve or restore function. These procedures are indicated when patients present more than 12 months from injury or when primary reconstruction procedures fail, and should focus on elbow flexion and shoulder stability. A free-functioning muscle transfer is often indicated for elbow flexion, with double free-functioning muscle transfers providing possible prehension. Shoulder reconstruction focuses on restoring stability to the glenohumeral joint and restoring abduction. This article outlines these techniques, their principles, and important details.

Background: Anterior dislocation of the glenohumeral joint in younger patients is associated with a high risk of recurrence and persistent functional deficits. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a primary arthroscopic Bankart repair, while controlling for the therapeutic effects produced by the arthroscopic intervention and joint lavage., Methods: In a single-center, double-blind clinical trial, eighty-eight adult patients under thirty-five years of age who had sustained a primary anterior glenohumeral dislocation were randomized to receive either an arthroscopic examination and joint lavage alone or together with an anatomic repair of the Bankart lesion. Assessment of the rate of recurrent instability, functional outcome (with use of three scores), range of movement, patient satisfaction, direct health-service costs, and treatment complications was completed for eighty-four of these patients (forty-two in each group) during the subsequent two years., Results: In the two years after the primary dislocation, the risk of a further dislocation was reduced by 76% and the risk of all recurrent instability was reduced by 82% in the Bankart repair group compared with the group that had arthroscopy and lavage alone. The functional scores were also better (p < 0.05), the treatment costs were lower (p = 0.012), and patient satisfaction was higher (p < 0.001) after arthroscopic repair. The improved functional outcome appeared to be mediated through the prevention of instability since the functional outcome in patients with stable shoulders was similar, irrespective of the initial treatment allocation. The patients who had a Bankart repair and played contact sports were also more likely to have returned to their sport at two years (relative risk = 3.4, p = 0.007)., Conclusions: Following a first-time anterior dislocation of the shoulder, there is a marked treatment benefit from primary arthroscopic repair of a Bankart lesion, which is distinct from the so-called background therapeutic effect of the arthroscopic examination and lavage of the joint. However, primary repair does not appear to confer a functional benefit to patients with a stable shoulder at two years after the dislocation.

Shoulder dislocation is common problem in orthopaedics. Management of recurrent shoulder dislocation is painstaking with different surgical procedures having varying outcomes. Laterjet-Bristow procedure provides stability and good functional outcome in Rowe scale and long term patient satisfaction. This is an observational prospective study carried out at two different tertiary care centers at Nepal and Pakistan using the same protocol. Habitual and pathological recurrent dislocations were excluded and all the recurrent dislocation of shoulder following initial traumatic anterior dislocation was included in this study. Standard Laterjet-Bristow operation was done and followed up for average of 27 months. Functional evaluation was done using Rowe score and graded as excellent, good, fair and poor. There were 12 men and 9 women with the mean ages of 23.4 years. At 12 months, 11 patients had fair result and seven patients had good result. At two years only three had fair result, 15 had good result and three patients had excellent result. Only three patients had poor result at one year while none had poor result at two year. The mean loss of external rotation in operated shoulder at one year was 24.33 degrees which decreased to 21.2 degrees at the end of second year. There was no restriction of external rotation in three patients at both yearly follow-ups while 18 patients had restriction in the range 10-30 degrees. Laterjet-Bristow can be the procedure of choice for surgical treatment of recurrent traumatic anterior dislocation and also as a salvage surgery for failed cases from other types of procedures. The only shortcoming of this procedure was some limitation in external rotation and minor loss in muscle power of that shoulder.

The surgical techniques applied to recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder, especially in hard working patients, must reconstruct a stable shoulder joint with a good range of motion, which will not re-dislocate, so the patients can return to their hardworking duties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of open Bankart repairs with suture anchors, in high-demand sportsmen and hard workers with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. Thirty shoulders of 29 patients were included in the study. All patients were active hard workers. A modified deltopectoral incision was used and Mitek GII Suture Anchors were implanted with 7-10 mm intervals into the bone-cartilage zone of the glenoid rim. Average follow-up time was 30 months (range, 22-38). Postoperative results were analysed according to the Rowe Scoring System. We obtained good and excellent results in 93.3% of cases. The open Bankart repair using suture anchors appeared in this study as a reliable technique for hard workers or physically high-demand patients.

Four patients with chronic posterior dislocation of the shoulder underwent surgical treatment after an average delay of 10 months from injury. They were examined clinically and radiographically at an average follow-up of 32 months. Treatment consisted of subscapularis tendon transfer (McLaughlin procedure) into the humeral defect in one case, transfer of the lesser tuberosity (McLaughlin modified procedure) in two cases, and in the fourth case-a patient with a 19-month missed dislocation and 50% humeral head lesion-a transposition of the coracoid process and conjoined tendon was performed. X-rays and CT scan excluded avascular necrosis or severe post-traumatic arthrosis. All patients achieved complete pain relief without limitation of daily or work activities. A slight limitation of anterior elevation and external rotation was present in all patients. Our results confirm that McLaughlin's original or modified procedure is suggested in cases of chronic, unreduced posterior dislocation of the shoulder (type I according to Randelli). The transposition of the coracoid process is a valid alternative to prosthesis and to autologous or homologous bone graft implants.

Background: After an anterior dislocation, shoulder instability may occur with disruption of the soft-tissue or osseous restraints, leading to early redislocation. The aim of the present study was to clarify the risk factors for this complication within the first six weeks after a first-time anterior traumatic dislocation and to assess the outcome of treatment with immediate operative stabilization., Methods: A three-year, prospective, observational cohort study of 538 consecutive patients with a first-time anterior dislocation of the shoulder was carried out. Reassessment of shoulder function was performed at a dedicated shoulder clinic, and suspected early redislocations were assessed with additional radiographs. All medically fit patients with a confirmed acute redislocation were treated with repeat closed reduction under anesthesia. Patients with unstable reductions were treated operatively. Functional and radiographic assessment of outcome was carried out during the first year after dislocation., Results: Seventeen (3.2%) of the 538 patients sustained an early redislocation within the first week after the original dislocation. Patients at increased risk of early redislocation included those who sustained the original dislocation as the result of a high-energy injury (relative risk = 13.7), those who had a neurological deficit (relative risk = 2.0), those in whom a large rotator cuff tear occurred in conjunction with the dislocation (relative risk = 29.8), those in whom the original dislocation was associated with a fracture of the glenoid rim (relative risk = 7.0), and those who had a fracture of both the glenoid rim and the greater tuberosity (relative risk = 33.5). Following operative reconstruction, the outcome at one year after the injury was favorable in terms of function, general health, and radiographic findings. None of the patients had a redislocation or symptoms of instability at one year., Conclusion: All patients who have substantial pain, a visible shoulder deformity, or restriction of movement at one week after reduction of a first-time dislocation should be evaluated with repeat radiographs to exclude a redislocation. Patients in whom this complication develops usually have either (1) severe disruption of the soft-tissue envelope due to a large rotator cuff tear or (2) disruption of the normal osseous restraints to dislocation due to either an isolated fracture of the glenoid rim or fractures of both the glenoid rim and the greater tuberosity. Early operative stabilization is justified for patients in whom the dislocation is associated with these coexisting conditions and who have evidence of gross instability.

We studied the range of shoulder motion of patients who underwent vertical as compared with horizontal capsulotomies during open Bankart repair for recurrent anterior dislocations of the shoulder. A vertical capsulotomy was used in 10 shoulders and a horizontal capsulotomy was used in 14 shoulders. Except for the method of capsulotomy, the surgical procedure and postoperative rehabilitation were the same. The range of motion was measured at 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, and 12 months after the surgery, and at the final follow-up (average, 49 months for the vertical and 26 months for the horizontal group). No dislocations recurred, and the anterior apprehension test was negative in all of the patients in both groups. External rotation in abduction was greater in the horizontal group than in the vertical group; the differences were significantly greater at 9 months and 12 months after surgery and at the final follow-up. External rotation in adduction, flexion, and internal rotation were not significantly different between the groups. We conclude that Bankart repair through a horizontal capsulotomy preserves a better range of external rotation in abduction than does a vertical approach.