Search

Objective To test whether early headgear (HG) treatment and space conditions in the dental arch affect the eruption pathway of the maxillary canines in young children with mixed dentition. Subjects and methods Data from two randomized controlled trials studying the effects of early HG treatment were pooled, yielding a study sample comprising 99 children (38 girls and 61 boys, mean age 7.6 years) with Angle Class II occlusion. Fifty-one children were treated with HG and 48 children served as an untreated control group (CG). Digital 3D models and panoramic radiographs were taken before (T0) and after (T1) treatment, and changes in the maxillary canine eruption angle and interdental spaces were measured at T0 and T1. A paired samples t -test was used to assess changes in maxillary canine angulation, and an independent samples t -test was used to evaluate the effect of HG treatment on spacing in the dental arch. Associations between intra-arch space conditions and changes in maxillary canine angulation were estimated with linear regression models. Results The eruption pattern of the permanent canine was significantly more vertical in the HG group than in the CG. The linear regression models showed a statistically significant association among the intercanine distance, crowding in the anterior part of the maxilla, and changes in the maxillary canine eruption angle. The maxillary canine eruption pattern changed significantly more to a vertical direction in spaced dental arches than in crowded dental arches in the HG group. Conclusion This study shows that early HG treatment in children with Angle Class II occlusion may change the eruption pattern of permanent maxillary canines to a more vertical direction. This change appears to be related to space conditions in the maxillary arch, especially in the intercanine region, with more effect in children with spaced dental arches than in children with crowded dental arches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study which investigates the proportion of skeletal/dentoalveolar components for correction of Class II malocclusion in relation to the pubertal growth peak (PGP) in patients who were treated with the mandibular advancement locking unit (MALU) appliance. The retrospective study of 27 orthodontic patients was conducted in which it analyzed pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) lateral cephalograms. The results showed no significant differences between groups.

Our aim was to evaluate the long-term treatment outcome of a systematically applied orthodontic screening and early treatment strategy in a public dental health care system, with special reference to occlusal stability at least 5 years post-retention. The subjects (N = 68) belonged to one age cohort born in a Finnish rural municipality (N = 85), and they were regularly followed from 8 to 20 years. Persons with malocclusions were screened and treated according to pre-planned protocol. Treatment need was assessed according to the Dental Health Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need, and treatment outcome using the peer assessment rating (PAR) Index and Little’s Index of Irregularity. Eighty-two per cent of the treated participants were out of retention (mean 6.9 years post-retention) at age 20. Definite treatment need in the study population decreased from 37% to 3 %. In the treated group, the mean PAR improvement decreased from 65 % to 63% from age 15 to 20 years. The mean irregularity score for the mandibular incisors was 4.0 [standard deviation (SD) 2.4] and for maxillary incisors 3.7 (SD 2.1) with no significant difference between treated and not treated subjects. The results suggest that definite need for orthodontic treatment may be predominantly eliminated from the target population with a systematically implemented treatment strategy focusing on early treatment with simple appliances. Emphasis on early timing of treatments may have contributed to the good long-term stability of treatment results. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The importance of the nickel exposure from fixed orthodontic appliances is under continuous discussion. Our aim was to investigate nickel allergy and the risk of nickel sensitization among female adolescents during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances as compared with non-treated female adolescents. Female patients starting or with ongoing orthodontic treatment ( n = 30) and young females without a history of orthodontic treatment ( n = 140) were studied. Patch testing with 5% nickel sulfate was carried out twice on each participant with an approximately 1-year interval. The subjects completed a questionnaire before the first testing. None of the 7 orthodontic patients with a positive patch test reaction to nickel had any clinically visible intraoral allergic symptoms during their treatment. No significant difference was seen in the occurrence of positive nickel reactions in regard to orthodontic treatment, or between the first and second tests. In the treatment group, 2 patients changed from nickel-positive to nickel-negative during the observation period, and one patient showed an opposite change. The quantity and course of changes in the repeated nickel patch test reactions did not differ significantly between the subjects with and without orthodontic treatment experience. Nickel sensitization from orthodontic appliances is improbable, but nickel sensitization may develop also during orthodontic treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Our purpose was to determine the residual need for early orthodontic treatment and the parameters associated with orthodontic treatment experience in 13- to 14-year-old school children in Kuwait. Subjects and Methods: A total of 788 boys and 795 girls, representing about 6.7% of the target population, were selected according to cluster sampling methods. Information on nationality, family income and orthodontic treatment experience was collected through subject and family interviews. The occlusal morphology was recorded in a well-lit classroom or from initial study models of subjects with orthodontic treatment experience. Results: Only 6.7% of the 225 subjects with early treatment need, defined as overjet ≥6.5 mm, and functional posterior and anterior crossbite on 1 or more teeth, had treatment experience. Residual need for early treatment was present in 13.4% of the subjects. Only 26.8% of the subjects with treatment experience met our criteria for early treatment need. The odds of treatment experience were higher in the subjects attending private schools (p < 0.05), in those from families with an income of KWD >2,000 (USD 6,600; p < 0.01) and in subjects meeting the criteria for early treatment need (p < 0.01). Conclusions: About 15% of each birth cohort of school children in Kuwait need early orthodontic treatment. Less than 10% of those with a need have treatment experience at 13–14 years of age, and about 75% of those with treatment experience at that age do not need early treatment. The predictors for treatment experience at 13–14 years of age are private-school attendance, a high family income and need for early treatment. Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate prevalence and severity of malocclusion in an adolescent Kuwaiti population. Subjects and Methods: Using a stratified cluster sampling method and excluding non-Kuwaitis, subjects with mesial migration and/or loss of first molars, and subjects with orthodontic treatment experience without availability of initial study models, we examined 1,299 Kuwaitis (674 boys and 625 girls) of mean age 13.2 ± 0.4 years in a regular well lit classroom. We scored molar and canine relationship, overjet, overbite, anterior and posterior cross bite as well as spacing and irregularity of the incisors using gloves, mirrors, rulers, and spatulas. Results: Fourteen, 15, and 71% met the criteria for almost ideal, mild, and moderate to severe malocclusion, respectively. Of the 86% with malocclusion, occurrence of class 1, half step class 2, full step class 2, half step class 3, and full step class 3 was 57.8, 24.9, 6.3, 8.8, and 2.2% for the first molars, and 36.1, 50.0, 6.2, 5.4, and 2.3% for the canines, respectively. Incisor malalignment was the most prevalent malocclusion trait (73.2%). Overjet ≥9.5 mm occurred in less than 1.5%, open bite in less than 3.5%, deep bite with gingival contact in less than 2.0%, complete posterior cross bite in less than 1.5%, and complete anterior crossbite in less than 2.0%. Median diastema was present in about 2/3 of the cases with maxillary anterior spacing as opposed to only about 1/3 of those with mandibular spacing. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that more than 70% of young adolescent Kuwaitis have moderate to severe malocclusion, with incisor malalignment as the most prevalent malocclusion trait. Copyright © 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of an early treatment oriented orthodontic program on treatment need at age 12 years in a public health care system. The subjects consisted of one whole age cohort in a municipality in Finland, 87 children in total. All children were examined at ages eight, 10, and 12 years. Treatment need was assessed on casts using a modified Dental Health Component of the index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and a 10-Grade Scale based on the Treatment Priority Index. Early treatment was started on children having definite treatment need according to both indices. The agreement between indices was good at ages eight and 12 years and moderate at age 10 years. Treatment need changed significantly from eight to 12 years. If the 29 children with definite treatment need at age eight years, only two had treatment need at age 12 years. Of the 38 children with no treatment need at age eight years, 28 remained in this category and only two children had definite need for treatment at age 12 years. The duration of treatment ranged from one to flu months, although 59% of the treatments lasted two years or less. We conclude that systematically planned early orthodontic treatment may have contributed to the significant reduction in treatment need from eight to 12 years of age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aims of this study were to explore orthodontic treatment experience, subjective need for treatment, and perceptions of teeth and dental appearance in relation to background factors such as funding system, area of living, age, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. The subjects were 1076 randomly selected second-year high school students from a rural (Jahra) and an urban (Capital) area of Kuwait, with a mean age of 15.1 years. Kuwaiti citizens constituted 79% of the sample, and the rest were of other Arab origins. The data were collected using a questionnaire. Orthodontic treatment rate was significantly higher for Kuwaitis (10%) than for non-Kuwaitis (2%). Among Kuwaiti subjects, urban area of living and female gender increased the odds of receiving orthodontic treatment. Subjective treatment need was 36%, with no difference between Kuwaiti and non-Kuwaiti subjects, but Kuwaitis in the rural area expressed subjective treatment need less often than those in the urban area. The results suggest that access to free-of-cost orthodontic treatment was likely to affect treatment rate, whereas it did not seem to influence the self-perceived need for treatment. Gender and area of living may be significant for the distribution of free-of-cost orthodontic treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Studies in the Scandinavian countries have shown that orthodontists run an equal or even greater risk of contracting dermatitis compared to other dental personnel. The aim of the study was to find out whether the self-reported occupation-related health problems of general dental practitioners and orthodontists differ from those of office employees in Finland. The subjects were 147 general dentists, 81 orthodontists and 99 office employees (77% women and 23% men). The data were collected using a mailed questionnaire. Within the past year, 42% of the subjects had had occupational health problems, while 51% had experienced symptoms in the previous year or earlier. The complaints of hand dermatoses, musculoskeletal, as well as respiratory symptoms were significantly more common among women than among men. Musculoskeletal complaints were the most common symptoms in all occupational groups, but the odds ratio of having them were significantly higher for dental professionals compared to office employees. The frequency of self-reported hand dermatoses was 42% for dental professionals and 26% for office employees, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. The odds of having hand dermatoses were higher for atopic subjects and for women. Orthodontists did not differ from general practitioners in respect of any of the complaints reported. Materials used in dentistry were mentioned as the cause of symptoms by 49 (21.5%) of the dental professionals. The present results show an increased risk of self-reported musculoskeletal symptoms for the dental professionals. Also, a tendency towards increased occurrence of skin symptoms was noted for the dental professionals compared to office employees of this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although nickel is the most common cause of contact allergy, nickel-containing orthodontic appliances seldom cause adverse reactions that result in discontinuation of treatment. We report on an eruption of dermatitis in the face and neck of an adult female patient after placement of a rapid maxillary expansion appliance (RME). Because the patient suspected nickel allergy, her tolerance to the appliance material was tested intraorally before treatment by cementing bands on four teeth for a week. No visible adverse reactions were seen during the test. One week after cementation of the RME appliance, the patient reported strong itching of the face and a red rash. Clinical examination showed itchy papular erythema on the face and neck. No intraoral reactions or symptoms were present. The RME appliance was removed, and symptoms disappeared in 4 to 5 days. The patient was referred for a nickel patch test, which gave a strong positive result. Adverse patient reactions of potential allergic origin should be diagnosed carefully, and their possible impact on further treatment should be evaluated accordingly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]