1. Importance of measurement methods and demographic characteristics in evaluating ulnar variance: A retrospective comparative study
- Author
-
Muzaffer Sindel, Serra Öztürk, Timur Sindel, Engin Calguner, Basak Oguz Yolcular, Baver Acar, Hande Salim, and Fulya Kahraman
- Subjects
Male ,Wrist Joint ,Radiography ,Population ,Ulna ,Wrist ,Sex Factors ,lcsh:Orthopedic surgery ,Reference Values ,Humans ,Medicine ,Body Weights and Measures ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,education ,Demography ,Retrospective Studies ,Orthodontics ,Analysis of Variance ,education.field_of_study ,Anthropometry ,business.industry ,Age Factors ,Retrospective cohort study ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Wrist osteoarthritis ,lcsh:RD701-811 ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Biological Variation, Population ,Population study ,Female ,Surgery ,Analysis of variance ,business ,Research Article - Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare 2 methods of ulnar variance (UV) measurement (the perpendicular method and the circular method) and to determine whether UV changed based on the demographic characteristics (sex and age). METHODS: UV was measured on bilateral wrist radiographs of 124 patients (62 men, 62 women; mean age=48.5 years; range=18–79 years) who had no history of trauma, congenital wrist anomaly, previous wrist surgery, and wrist osteoarthritis by a single radiologist with 4 years of experience. All measurements were made on standardized radiographic images using 2 methods: the perpendicular method and the circular method. All the patients were then divided into groups based on sex and age, and the study population was determined by selecting a similar number of patients for each sex and age group. RESULTS: The mean UV of the right and left wrists was measured as 0.33 (range=−4.3 to 5.7) mm by the perpendicular method and as 0.034 (range=−5 to 5.7) mm by the circular method. A significant difference was determined between the 2 measurement methods (p
- Published
- 2021