1. Orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in patients treated with fixed appliances vs removable aligners.
- Author
-
Iglesias-Linares A, Sonnenberg B, Solano B, Yañez-Vico RM, Solano E, Lindauer SJ, and Flores-Mir C
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Genotype, Humans, Incisor diagnostic imaging, Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein genetics, Interleukin-1beta genetics, Logistic Models, Male, Malocclusion therapy, Odds Ratio, Osteopontin genetics, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Radiography, Dental methods, Reproducibility of Results, Root Resorption diagnostic imaging, Young Adult, Orthodontic Appliances classification, Orthodontics, Corrective adverse effects, Root Resorption etiology, Root Resorption genetics, Tooth Apex
- Abstract
Objective: To determine whether orthodontic treatment with removable aligners vs fixed orthodontic appliances is associated with a different frequency of orthodontically induced external apical root resorption (OIEARR) when genetic, radiographic, and clinical factors are accounted for., Materials and Methods: Three hundred seventy-two orthodontic patients treated with removable aligners (Invisalign) or fixed appliances were genetically screened for interleukin 1B gene (IL1B) (rs1143634), interleukin 1 receptor antagonist gene (IL1RN) (rs419598), and osteopontin gene (SPP1) (rs9138/rs11730582). Twelve clinical variables, potentially associated with OIEARR, were also considered. Subjects were divided according to the presence of radiographically determined OIEARR (>2 mm). The association between OIEARR and appliance type, and radiographic, clinical and genetic factors, was assessed using backward stepwise conditional logistic regression. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported., Results: Reliability of the methods was adequate. Clinical case complexity (American Board of Orthodontics [ABO] Discrepancy Index) (OR: 1.032; 95% CI: 1.005-1.061; P = .021) and extent of incisor apical displacement in the sagittal plane (OR: 1.478; 95% CI: 1.285-1.699; P = .001) were associated with an increased OIEARR risk. After adjusting for associations between clinical/radiographic/genetic factors, there were no statistically significant differences with respect to OIEARR or type of orthodontic appliance used, whether removable aligners or fixed appliances (OR: 1.662; 95% CI: 0.945-2.924; P = .078). Only subjects homozygous for the T allele of IL1RN (rs419598) were more prone to OIEARR during orthodontic treatment (OR: 3.121; CI: 1.93-5.03; P < .001)., Conclusions: A similar OIEARR predisposition was identified using either removable aligners (Invisalign) or fixed appliances.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF