Search

Objectives: Head and neck cancer of unknown primary (CUP) poses significant therapeutic challenges. We compare CUP and oropharyngeal primary (OP) cases to identify factors associated with tumor detection., Methods: The 2004-2019 National Cancer Database was queried to identify CUP and OP cases based on clinical and pathologic TNM staging. Clinical and demographic characteristics were compared by primary detection and HPV status with descriptive statistics. Multivariable logistic regression models to characterize OP detection were constructed. Among HPV-positive and negative patients, respectively, OP and CUP patients were matched by clinical nodal disease. Cox proportional-hazards models were constructed using matched cohorts to characterize survival., Results: 81,053 CUP and OP cases were identified; 64.3 % were HPV-positive. OP detection increased over time in HPV-positive and negative disease. HPV-positive status had higher odds of OP detection (odds ratio (OR) = 1.77, p < 0.001), while females (OR = 0.95, p = 0.008), and black (OR = 0.82, p < 0.001) and Asian (OR = 0.7, p < 0.001) patients had lower odds compared to males and whites, respectively. In HPV-positive and negative disease, OP patients had higher 2 and 5-year survival rates than CUP (p < 0.001). Primary detection status conferred lower death risk in HPV-positive (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, p < 0.001) and negative disease (HR = 0.87, p < 0.001) when controlling for age, sex, race, comorbidities, insurance, treatment facility, and income., Conclusion: In the largest cohort of CUP to date, we report a survival benefit in primary tumor detection regardless of HPV status. Groups with higher persistent CUP rates, including non-white, female, HPV-negative, and low income patients, may benefit from increased diagnostic workup to improve detection and treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Most transoral robotic surgery (TORS) literature for HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPC) derives from high-volume tertiary-care centers. This study aims to describe long-term recurrence and survival outcomes among Veterans Health Administration patients., Materials and Methods: Using the US Veterans Affairs database, we identified patients with HPV-OPC treated with TORS between January 2010 and December 2016. Patients were stratified in risk categories: low (0-1 metastatic nodes, negative margins), intermediate (close margins, 2-4 metastatic nodes, lymphovascular or perineural invasion, pT3-pT4 tumor), or high (positive margins, extranodal extension (ENE), and/or ≥5 metastatic nodes). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS)., Results: The cohort included 161 patients of which 29 (18%) were low-risk, 45 (28%) intermediate-risk, and 87 (54%) high-risk. ENE was present in 41% of node-positive cases and 24% had positive margins. Median follow-up was 5.6 years (95% CI, 3.0-9.3). The 5-year DSS for low, intermediate, and high-risk groups were: 100%, 90.0% (95% CI, 75.4-96.1%), and 88.7% (95% CI, 78.3-94.2%). Pathologic features associated with poor DSS on univariable analysis included pT3-T4 tumors (HR 3.81, 95% CI, 1.31-11; p = 0.01), ≥5 metastatic nodes (HR 3.41, 95% CI, 1.20-11; p = 0.02), and ENE (HR 3.53, 95% CI, 1.06-12; p = 0.04). Higher 5-year cumulative incidences of recurrence were observed in more advanced tumors (pT3-T4, 33% [95% CI, 14-54%] versus pT1-T2, 13% [95% CI, 8-19%]; p = 0.01)., Conclusions: In this nationwide study, patients with HPV-OPC treated with TORS followed by adjuvant therapy at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers demonstrated favorable survival outcomes comparable to those reported in high-volume academic centers and clinical trials., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:207-214, 2024., (© 2023 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Background: Understanding biological differences between different racial groups of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients, who have differences in terms of incidence, survival, and tumor morphology, can facilitate accurate prognostic biomarkers, which can help develop personalized treatment strategies., Methods: This study evaluated whether there were morphologic differences between HPV-associated tumors from Black and White patients in terms of multinucleation index (MuNI), an image analysis-derived metric that measures density of multinucleated tumor cells within epithelial regions on hematoxylin-eosin images and previously has been prognostic in HPV-associated OPSCC patients. In this study, the authors specifically evaluated whether the same MuNI cutoff that was prognostic of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival in their previous study, T TR , is valid for Black and White patients, separately. We also evaluated population-specific cutoffs, T B for Blacks and T W for Whites, for risk stratification., Results: MuNI was statistically significantly different between Black (mean, 3.88e-4; median, 3.67e-04) and White patients (mean, 3.36e-04; median, 2.99e-04), with p = .0078. Using T TR , MuNI was prognostic of OS in the entire population with hazard ratio (HR) of 1.71 (p = .002; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-2.43) and in White patients with HR of 1.72 (p = .005; 95% CI, 1.18-2.51). Population-specific cutoff, T W , yielded improved HR of 1.77 (p = .003; 95% CI, 1.21-2.58) for White patients, whereas T B did not improve risk-stratification in Black patients with HR of 0.6 (p = .3; HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-1.80)., Conclusions: Histological difference between White and Black patient tumors in terms of multinucleated tumor cells suggests the need for considering population-specific prognostic biomarkers for personalized risk stratification strategies for HPV-associated OPSCC patients., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has excellent control rates compared to nonvirally associated OPSCC. Multiple trials are actively testing whether de-escalation of treatment intensity for these patients can maintain oncologic equipoise while reducing treatment-related toxicity. We have developed OP-TIL, a biomarker that characterizes the spatial interplay between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and surrounding cells in histology images. Herein, we sought to test whether OP-TIL can segregate stage I HPV-associated OPSCC patients into low-risk and high-risk groups and aid in patient selection for de-escalation clinical trials., Methods: Association between OP-TIL and patient outcome was explored on whole slide hematoxylin and eosin images from 439 stage I HPV-associated OPSCC patients across 6 institutional cohorts. One institutional cohort (n = 94) was used to identify the most prognostic features and train a Cox regression model to predict risk of recurrence and death. Survival analysis was used to validate the algorithm as a biomarker of recurrence or death in the remaining 5 cohorts (n = 345). All statistical tests were 2-sided., Results: OP-TIL separated stage I HPV-associated OPSCC patients with 30 or less pack-year smoking history into low-risk (2-year disease-free survival [DFS] = 94.2%; 5-year DFS = 88.4%) and high-risk (2-year DFS = 82.5%; 5-year DFS = 74.2%) groups (hazard ratio = 2.56, 95% confidence interval = 1.52 to 4.32; P < .001), even after adjusting for age, smoking status, T and N classification, and treatment modality on multivariate analysis for DFS (hazard ratio = 2.27, 95% confidence interval = 1.32 to 3.94; P = .003)., Conclusions: OP-TIL can identify stage I HPV-associated OPSCC patients likely to be poor candidates for treatment de-escalation. Following validation on previously completed multi-institutional clinical trials, OP-TIL has the potential to be a biomarker, beyond clinical stage and HPV status, that can be used clinically to optimize patient selection for de-escalation., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: The oncologic outcomes of surgery alone for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition (AJCC 7th) pN2a and pN2b human papillomavirus-associated oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+OPSCC) are not clear., Methods: The authors performed a 12-institution retrospective study of 344 consecutive patients with HPV+OPSCC (AJCC 7th pT0-3 N3 M0) treated with surgery alone with 6 months or more of follow-up using univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: The 2-year outcomes for the entire cohort were 91% (182 of 200) disease-free survival (DFS), 100% (200 of 200) disease-specific survival (DSS), and 98% (200 of 204) overall survival (OS). The 18 recurrences within 2 years were 88.9% (16 of 18) local and/or regional recurrences and 11.1% (2 of 18) distant metastases. Recurrences were not significantly associated with smoking, pT stage, or pN stage. The 16 patients with locoregional recurrences within 2 years all underwent successful salvage treatments (median follow-up after salvage: 13.1 months), 43.8% (7 of 16) of whom underwent salvage surgery alone for a 2-year overall salvage radiation need of 4.5% (9 of 200). The 2-year outcomes for the 59 evaluable patients among the 109 AJCC 7th pT0-2 N2a-N2b patients with 1 to 3 pathologic lymph nodes (LNs) were as follows: local recurrence, 3.4% (2 of 59); regional recurrence, 8.4% (5 of 59); distant metastases, 0%; DFS, 88.1% (52 of 59); DSS, 100% (59 of 59); OS, 96.7% (59 of 61); and salvage radiation, 5.1% (3 of 59)., Conclusions: With careful selection, surgery alone for AJCC 7th pT0-T2N0-N2b HPV+OPSCC with zero to 3 pathologic LNs without perineural invasion, extranodal extension, or positive margins results in high DFS, DSS, OS, and salvage treatment success. Because of the short-term follow-up, these data support further investigation of treatment de-escalation in this population., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

Objectives: To evaluate the performance characteristics of seven predetermined imaging features on pretreatment computed tomography (CT) in identifying extranodal extension (ENE) in cervical lymph node metastases from human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma (HPV-OPC)., Study Design: Retrospective study., Methods: Seventy-three patients with HPV-OPC who underwent primary surgery and cervical lymph node dissection were included. Preoperative contrast-enhanced CT (cCT) imaging was evaluated by two radiologists blinded to pathological results. Each cCT was scored for seven imaging features of interest: 1) indistinct capsular contours, 2) irregular nodal margins, 3) perinodal fat stranding, 4) perinodal fat planes, 5) nodal necrosis, 6) intranodal cysts, and 7) nodal matting. Logistic regression was employed to determine radiologist-specific odds ratios (OR) of predicting ENE for each imaging feature and radiologist-specific receiver operating characteristics (sensitivity [Sn], specificity [Sp], area under the curve [AUC], positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV]) for each imaging feature., Results: Thirty-two (44%) patients had ENE-positive lymph nodes. The presence of irregular margins (OR A = 12.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] A = 2.3-65.9; OR B = 7.0, 95% CI B = 1.4-36.3) and absence of perinodal fat plane (OR A = 6.8, 95% CI A = 2.0-23.3; OR B = 14.2, 95% CI B = 1.7-120.5) were significantly associated with ENE for each radiologist. Irregular nodal margin status was most specific for ENE (Sn A = 45%, Sp A = 94%, AUC A = 69%, PPV A = 82%, NPV A = 73%; Sn B = 28%, Sp B = 95%, AUC B = 61%, PPV B = 80%, NPV B = 64%). Absence of perinodal fat plane was most sensitive for ENE (Sn A = 87%, Sp A = 50%, AUC A = 69%, PPV A = 59%, NPV A = 62%; Sn B = 96%, Sp B = 34%, AUC B = 65%, PPV B = 53%, NPV B = 63%)., Conclusions: Of the seven imaging features hypothesized to be associated with ENE-status, the presence of irregular nodal margins and absence of perinodal fat plane were the most specific and sensitive features, respectively., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1479-1486, 2020., (© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Objectives/hypothesis: To evaluate if a simple method for assessing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in primary tumor specimens improves the prognostic value of the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 8th Edition (AJCC8) cancer staging system in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPC)., Study Design: Retrospective study., Methods: In this study, TIL density was quantified on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained specimens from patients presenting to Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2009 and 2017 who underwent primary surgical therapy and had primary tumor specimens available for analysis. The prognostic effect of TIL density was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models considering recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the primary outcome., Results: This study included 132 patients. Ninety-five percent were classified by clinical criteria with AJCC8 early-stage disease (stage I: 82%, stage II: 13%). After 84 months of follow-up, 15 recurrences were observed. Among clinically early-stage disease, TIL high status was associated with improved RFS compared to TIL low (P = .002). Adjusted analysis showed TIL high status was associated with 79% lower risk of recurrence than TIL low (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.210, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.061-0.723). In clinical stage I disease, TIL high status was associated with improved RFS compared to TIL low in both univariate and multivariate analyses (hazard ratio: 0.235, P = .021; aHR: 0.218; 95% CI: 0.058-0.822). TIL density similarly stratified risk in pathologically staged disease., Conclusions: In patients with AJCC8 stage I disease, low TIL density was associated with diminished RFS. Our data suggest that assessing TIL density on H&E-stained primary tumor specimens may enhance the prognostic resolution of the AJCC8 staging criteria for HPV-OPC., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:930-938, 2020., (© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Introduction: Little is known regarding how human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC) patient goals change with treatment. This study evaluates whether patient ranking of non-oncologic priorities relative to cure and survival shift after treatment as compared to priorities at diagnosis., Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study of HPV-OPC patient survey responses at diagnosis and after treatment. The relative importance of 12 treatment-related priorities was ranked on an ordinal scale (1 as highest). Median rank (MR) was compared using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests. Prevalence of high concern for 11 treatment-related issues was compared using paired t-test. The effect of patient characteristics on change in priority rank and concern was evaluated using linear regression., Results: Among 37 patients, patient priorities were generally unchanged after treatment compared with at diagnosis, with cure and survival persistently ranked top priority. Having a moist mouth uniquely rose in importance after treatment. Patient characteristics largely did not affect change in priority rank. Concerns decreased after treatment, except concern regarding recurrence., Discussion: Treatment-related priorities are largely similar at diagnosis and after treatment regardless of patient characteristics. The treatment experience does not result in a shift of priorities from cure and survival to non-oncologic domains over cure and survival. The rise in importance of moist mouth implies that xerostomia may have been underappreciated as a sequelae of treatment. A decrease in most treatment-related concerns is encouraging, whereas the persistence of specific areas of concern may inform patient counseling., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of sex and race/ethnicity upon prevalence trends of human papillomavirus (HPV) in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and survival after OPC., Method: This was a cohort study of patients included in the United States National Cancer Database who had been diagnosed with OPC between 2010 and 2015. Outcomes were HPV status of tumor specimens and overall survival. Sex- and race-stratified trends in HPV prevalence were estimated using generalized linear modeling. The influence of sex, race, and HPV tumor status on overall survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox Proportional Hazards models., Results: This analysis included 20,886 HPV-positive and 10,364 HPV-negative OPC patients. The prevalence of HPV-positive tumors was higher among men (70.6%) than women (56.3%) and increased significantly over time at a rate of 3.5% and 3.2% per year among men and women, respectively. The prevalence of HPV-positive tumors was highest among whites (70.2%), followed by Hispanics (61.3%), Asians (55.8%), and blacks (46.3%). Blacks and Hispanics experienced significantly more rapid increases in prevalence of HPV-positive tumors over time compared with whites (6.5% vs 5.6% vs 3.2% per year, respectively). In HPV-positive OPC, neither sex nor race/ethnicity was associated with survival among patients with HPV-positive OPC. In contrast, for HPV-negative OPC, risk of death was significantly higher for women versus men (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.26) and blacks versus whites (aHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10-1.33)., Conclusion: The prevalence of HPV-positive tumors is increasing for all sex and race/ethnicity groups in the United States. Sex and race are independently associated with survival for HPV-negative but not HPV-positive OPC., (© 2018 American Cancer Society.)

Objectives: HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients have been observed to be younger than patients with HPV-negative OPC at diagnosis. We evaluated recent trends in age at OPC diagnosis, and whether older age attenuates the survival benefit of HPV-positive tumor status., Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with OPC from 2004 to 2014 represented in the National Cancer Database were included. HPV tumor status was available after 2010. Trends in age by calendar year were compared using linear regression. Overall survival was compared using Cox Proportional Hazards models., Results: The mean age of OPC patients (N = 119,611) increased significantly from 2004 to 2014 (ß = 0.21 years of age per calendar year, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.19-0.23). The increase in age from 2010 to 2014 was similar for HPV-positive (N = 21,880; ß = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.53-0.72) and HPV-negative (N = 11,504; ß = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.45-0.74) patients. Between 2010 and 2014, the proportion of OPCs that were HPV-positive increased significantly for all age groups, including for patients ≥70 years old (from 45% to 60%, p trend  < 0.001). Although patients ≥70 years with HPV-OPC had improved survival compared to those with HPV-negative OPC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.55-0.76), the survival benefit of HPV-positive tumor status was significantly attenuated compared to younger HPV-OPC patients (50-59 years: aHR = 0.45, 95%CI = 0.39-0.51; p interaction  < 0.001)., Conclusion: The age at OPC diagnosis is increasing for both HPV-positive and HPV-negative patients, and a rising proportion of older patients have HPV-positive tumors. These findings dispel the notion that HPV-positive OPC is a disease of younger patients, identify a growing elderly population of HPV-positive OPC patients with reduced survival, and have implications for evolving treatment paradigms., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare transcervical ultrasonography (US) to standard cross-sectional imaging for the visualization of human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC)., Materials and Methods: Patients with HPV-OPC and available standard imaging (CT and/or MRI) were identified in clinic and prospectively enrolled. US was performed to visualize the oropharynx and lymph nodes. Tumor characteristics across imaging modalities were evaluated (CT versus MRI, and US versus standard imaging (SI))., Results: Forty-three patients were included. The overall blinded detection rates for CT and MRI were 83% and 71%, respectively. The unblinded detection rate for US was 98%. Agreement of tumor anatomic subsite was moderate for both CT vs MRI (κ = 0.59) and US vs SI (κ = 0.47). Comparison of tumor size by CT and MRI showed statistically significant correlations in craniocaudal (CC), anteroposterior (AP), and mediolateral (ML) dimensions (Rho CC  = 0.51, p CC  = 0.038; Rho AP  = 0.81, p AP  < 0.0001; Rho ML  = 0.57, p ML  = 0.012). Tumor size estimates by US and SI showed statistically significant correlations in CC and AP, but not ML (Rho CC  = 0.60, p CC  = 0.003; Rho AP  = 0.71, p AP  < 0.0001; Rho ML  = 0.30, p ML  = 0.08). Tumor volume estimates improved correlations between US and SI (Rho = 0.66, p < 0.0001). Stratification of US patients into early and late imaging studies demonstrated an increase in correlation strength from early (Rho = 0.32, p = 0.32) to late groups (Rho = 0.77, p < 0.0001) demonstrating that ultrasound accuracy improved with experience., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that transcervical ultrasonography is a sensitive and relatively accurate adjunct to standard imaging for the evaluation of oropharyngeal tumors. Its cost, portability, and potential for in-clinic and serial imaging render US an attractive modality to further develop for imaging oropharyngeal tumors., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To examine reader performance in evaluating oropharyngeal anatomy on ultrasonography., Materials and Methods: Ultrasound images of the oropharynx comprising normal and malignant anatomic variants were organized into slideshows. Slideshows were administered to 6 readers blinded to participant tumor status and with varying experience reading oropharyngeal sonograms. A training slideshow oriented readers to images of the oropharynx with and without malignant lesions. Readers then evaluated images in a test slideshow for tumor presence and marked orthogonal long and short dimensions of the tumor. Results were analyzed for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, inter-reader agreement, and measurement error relative to prospectively-identified reference measurements., Results: Eighty-seven percent of base of tongue (BOT) sonograms were identified correctly by a majority of readers. In identifying BOT tumors, median accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Fleiss's kappa were 79%, 73%, 85%, and 0.51, respectively. Median measurement error in the long and short axes for BOT tumors was -2.6% (range: -40% to 29%) and -2.6% (range: -56% to 156%), respectively. Eighty-four percent of palatine tonsil sonograms were identified correctly by a majority of readers. In identifying tonsil tumors, median accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Fleiss's kappa were 77%, 74%, 78%, and 0.41, respectively. Median measurement error in the long and short axes for tonsil tumors was 3.8% (range: -45% to 32%) and -6.5% (range: -83% to 42%), respectively., Conclusions: Overall, US has clinically useful sensitivity for identification of oropharyngeal carcinoma among readers of diverse clinical backgrounds and experience. US may be useful for the evaluation of features such as tumor dimensions., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-positive OPC) is a distinct subtype of head and neck carcinoma (HNC) distinguished from HPV-negative HNC by its risk factor profile, clinical behavior, and molecular biology. Compared to HPV-negative HNC, HPV-positive OPC exhibits significantly better prognosis and an enhanced response to treatment. Recognition of the survival benefit of HPV-positive tumors has led to therapeutic de-intensification strategies aiming to mitigate treatment-related toxicities while maintaining high response rates. In this review, we summarize key aspects of oral HPV infection and the molecular mechanisms of HPV-related carcinogenesis. We review the clinical and molecular characteristics of HPV-positive OPC that contribute to its improved prognosis compared to HPV-negative HNC. We also discuss current and emerging treatment strategies, emphasizing potential mechanisms of treatment sensitivity and the role of therapeutic de-intensification in HPV-positive OPC. Lastly, we examine literature on the management and prognosis of recurrent/metastatic HPV-positive OPC with a focus on the role of salvage surgery in its management.

Background: In the era of deintensification, little data are available regarding patients' treatment preferences. The current study evaluated treatment‐related priorities, concerns, and regret among patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Methods: A total of 150 patients with HNSCC ranked the importance of 10 nononcologic treatment goals relative to the oncologic goals of cure and survival. The level of concern regarding 11 issues and decision regret was recorded. Median rank was reported overall, and factors associated with odds of rank as a top 3 priority were modeled using logistic regression. Results: Among the treatment effects analyzed, the odds of being a top 3 priority was especially high for cure (odds, 9.17; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.05‐16.63), followed by survival and swallow (odds, 1.26 [95% CI, 0.88‐1.80] and odds, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.59‐1.21], respectively). Prioritization of cure, survival, and swallow was similar based on human papillomavirus (HPV) tumor status. By increasing decade of age, older participants were found to be significantly less likely than younger individuals to prioritize survival (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52‐1.00). Concerns regarding mortality (P = .04) and transmission of HPV to the patient's spouse (P = .03) were more frequent among participants with HPV‐associated HNSCC. Regret increased with additional treatment modalities (P = .02). Conclusions: Patients with HNSCC overwhelming prioritize cure, followed by survival and swallow. The decreased prioritization of survival by older age supports further examination of treatment preference by age. The precedence of oncologic over nononcologic priorities among patients regardless of HPV tumor status supports the conservative adoption of deintensification regimens until the interplay between competing oncologic and nononcologic treatment goals is better understood. When asked to rank treatment‐related priorities, patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer overwhelmingly prioritize cure, followed by survival and swallow. The results appear to be similar by human papillomavirus tumor status, supporting the conservative adoption of deintensification regimens until the interplay between competing oncologic and nononcologic treatment goals is better understood. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]