Search

Objectives: We analyzed the prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy (RPL) in stage I node-positive HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC)., Materials and Methods: We performed a centralized and blinded radiographic review of the pre-treatment images of 234 consecutive patients with AJCC 8th edition stage I cT1-2N1 HPV-associated OPSCC treated with definitive chemoradiation from 2006 to 2016. Five-year disease control and survival outcomes were reported. The prognostic significance of RPL was evaluated through multivariable analysis adjusting for age, smoking history (<10 vs. >10 pack-years), and systemic regimen received., Results: Median follow-up for surviving patients was 49 months (range: 16-121). RPL was associated with increased locoregional recurrence (LRR) (17.0% v. 3.4%, p = 0.01) and distant metastasis (DM) (29.1% v. 5.9%, p = 0.001) and inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (55.6% v. 88.2%, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (60.6% v. 91.2%, p < 0.001). In stage I patients who did not receive high-dose cisplatin (HDC), RPL was associated with worse LRR (p = 0.04), DM (p = 0.03), PFS (p < 0.001), and OS (p < 0.001), whereas in those who did receive HDC, RPL was only associated with increased DM (p = 0.002) and inferior PFS (p = 0.04)., Conclusion: This study suggests that RPL portends a poor prognosis in stage I node-positive HPV-associated OPSCC. The negative impact on LRR may have been mitigated by receipt of HDC. Outcomes of stage I disease with RPL were comparable to historical reports of patients with more advanced-stage disease. Incorporation of RPL into future disease staging should be considered in order to optimize risk-stratification and exclude unsuitable candidates from treatment de-intensification efforts., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This study evaluates the prognostic impact of several factors in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), controlling for human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated tumors and stage (American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition). All patients in Southern California Permanente Medical Group diagnosed with OPSCC between 2006 and 2012 tested for p16 immunohistochemistry were included. Review of all pathology materials was combined with central p16 testing. Multivariable analyses were performed. The cohort of 390 patients included 342 p16-positive and 48 p16-negative tumors. For all-comers, on univariate analysis, the following factors, when present, were associated with improved patient survival: p16-positive tumor (n = 324, p < 0.001); crypt versus surface tumor location (n = 312, p = 0.004); nonkeratinizing type (n = 309, p < 0.0001); nonkeratinizing with maturation type (n = 37, p < 0.0001); basaloid pattern (n = 284, p = 0.005); and a broad, pushing border of infiltration (n = 282, p = 0.004). Inferior survival outcomes were observed with: age ≥ 55 years (p < 0.0001); ≥ 10 pack-year smoking history (n = 183, p = 0.003); increasing tumor stage (p < 0.0001); overt radiographic extranodal extension (ORENE) (n = 58, p < 0.0001); low level IV/Vb lymph node involvement (n = 45, p = 0.0002); a jagged pattern of infiltration (n = 76, p = 0.0004); tumor ulceration (n = 76, p = 0.0004); absent lymphocytic infiltrate (p < 0.0001); and concurrent dysplasia (n = 125, p = 0.009). On multivariable analysis, accounting for patient age, smoking history ≥ 10 pack-years, and TNM stage, for patients with p16-positive disease, advanced TNM stage (p = 0.007), the presence of ORENE (p = 0.0002), and low-neck lymphadenopathy (p = 0.0001) were independent negative prognostic factors for disease free survival (DFS). Older age (p < 0.0001), smoking history ≥ 10 pack-years (p = 0.02), advanced TNM stage (p = 0.0002), ORENE (p = 0.004), and low-neck lymphadenopathy (p = 0.002) were independent negative prognostic factors for OS. Among patients with p16-positive OPSCC, older age, smoking history, advanced stage, ORENE, and low-neck lymphadenopathy were significant negative prognostic factors for DFS and/or OS. Further refinement of staging to incorporate additional lymph node findings may be warranted.

Objective: We compared high-dose cisplatin (HDC) vs. triweekly carboplatin (TC)-based chemoradiation in patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC)., Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted from 2006 to 2015 of 421 patients with locally advanced p16-positive OPSCC receiving definitive radiotherapy concurrent with 3 cycles of HDC (100 mg/m 2 , n = 230) or TC (AUC = 5, n = 191). Three-year locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), overall recurrence rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and cause-specific survival (CSS) are reported. HDC and TC were compared accounting for age, sex, comorbidity index score, smoking history, T stage, and N stage., Results: For all-comers, no difference was observed between HDC and TC for any outcome except for ORR which was lower in patients receiving HDC (12% vs. 17%, p = 0.03). On stage-based analysis, no difference was observed between agents for any outcome for stage I or II disease. However, patients with stage III disease receiving HDC had lower rates of LRR (9% vs. 21%, p = 0.03), DM (7% vs. 28%, p = 0.006), and ORR (14% vs. 40%, p = 0.002), and superior OS (89% vs. 78%, p = 0.04) and CSS (95% vs. 80%, p = 0.02). Patients receiving HDC experienced higher rates of grade 3 leukopenia (25% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), weight loss ≥20% from baseline (21% vs. 8%, p < 0.001), and gastrostomy-tube placements (66% vs. 27%, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: TC demonstrated comparable outcomes to HDC for stage I or II HPV-associated OPSCC but was inferior to HDC for stage III disease. TC was associated with less toxicity and may be a potential de-intensification agent for early-stage disease., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Although human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is typically associated with a good prognosis, patients with T4 disease experience relatively high rates of treatment failure. Our aim was to identify predictors of relapse among patients with clinical T4 disease., Material & Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 93 consecutive patients who underwent definitive concurrent chemoradiation for HPV-associated OPSCC with clinical T4 disease from July 2006 to December 2015. Three-year outcomes, including locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS), were examined and reported from the date of treatment completion. Multivariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was performed to test associations between outcome and patient and disease characteristics as well as chemotherapy regimen (high-dose cisplatin (HDC) vs. other)., Results: Median follow-up for surviving patients was 50 months (range 18-133). For all-comers, 3-year rates of LRR, DM, OS, and CSS were 15%, 19%, 79%, and 86%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the only factor prognostic for patient outcomes was the chemotherapy regimen. For patients who received HDC vs. an alternative regimen, 3-year LRR, DM, OS, and CSS, were 9% vs. 20% (p = 0.09), 10% vs. 28% (p = 0.04), 89% vs. 67% (p = 0.04), and 96% vs. 77% (p = 0.02), respectively., Conclusion: In patients with HPV-associated OPSCC bearing clinical T4 disease, receipt of a concurrent systemic agent other than HDC resulted in increased treatment failure and inferior survival. This analysis suggests that HDC should remain the preferred concurrent regimen for these patients., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The updated AJCC Cancer Staging Manual groups all p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with unilateral nodal involvement within 6 cm into the new clinical N1 classification, consolidating a heterogeneous group of disease with varying radiographic findings., Methods: A central radiological review was conducted identifying 233 patients with stage I node-positive (cT1-2N1) disease who underwent definitive concurrent chemoradiation. Factors evaluated included lymph node size, low-neck lymphadenopathy, retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy, overt radiographic extracapsular extension, and matted lymphadenopathy., Results: On multivariate analysis adjusted for age, smoking history, and chemotherapy regimen, low-neck lymphadenopathy (hazard ratio (HR) = 6.55; P < .001) and retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy (HR = 3.36; P = .009) predicted for inferior progression-free survival (PFS). low-neck lymphadenopathy (HR = 6.38; P = .001) and retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy (HR = 3.32; P = .02) also predicted for inferior overall survival (OS). All other radiographic characteristics showed no prognostic impact for PFS or OS., Conclusions: This analysis suggests that caution should be advised against de-intensification efforts among patients with stage I node-positive p16-positive OPSCC with low-neck lymphadenopathy or retropharyngeal lymphadenopathy., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: The addition of induction chemotherapy (ICT) to concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) has been investigated as a method of improving outcomes among patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Previous studies have consisted of heterogeneous populations with both p16-positive and p16-negative disease and varying extent of nodal disease burden. We evaluated the role of ICT in p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) at high-risk of distant failure., Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 88 consecutive patients with p16-positive OPSCC with low-neck and/or N3 lymphadenopathy. Among these patients, 44 received ICT followed by CCRT, and 44 received CCRT alone with concurrent agents including Cisplatin, Carboplatin, and Cetuximab. Disease control and survival outcomes were reported after adjusting for age, T stage, N stage, and smoking status., Results: Median follow-up for surviving patients was 47 (range: 13-115) months. Patients who received CCRT alone were older than those who received ICT (61 years vs. 56 years; p = 0.02); the groups were otherwise similarly balanced. 3-year distant metastasis: 38% vs. 18% (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.32 [0.13-0.82]; p = 0.02). 3-year progression-free survival: 49% vs. 74% (adjusted HR = 0.46 [0.22-0.93]; p = 0.03). 3-year overall survival: 67% vs. 83% (adjusted HR = 0.48 [0.21-1.12]; p = 0.09)., Conclusion: Among patients with p16-positive OPSCC with low-neck and/or N3 lymphadenopathy, ICT followed by CCRT may reduce the risk for distant failure over CCRT alone and lead to improved progression-free survival. Future trials should concentrate on patients at the highest risk of distant metastasis in order to appropriately assess the benefit of ICT., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)