Search

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Geriatric impairments and frailty are highly prevalent in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). This study investigated the association of frailty and outcomes of geriatric assessment (GA) with radiation-induced toxicity (RIT) in patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy ((C)RT) for HNC.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2014 and April 2016, patients with HNC were prospectively included in OncoLifeS, an institutional data-biobank. Before treatment initiation, patients underwent GA and frailty screening (Groningen Frailty Indicator and Geriatric 8). The main outcome of this study was RIT (weight loss, mucositis, salivary gland inflammation, oral pain, sore throat, hoarseness, dry mouth, dysgeusia, dysphagia and general pain) according to the common terminology criteria of adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Linear mixed models were performed, to analyse factors associated with increasing mean RIT over time during the treatment period.RESULTS: 160 patients were included. 114 (71.3%) were male and the mean age was 66.1 years. Age ≥ 65 (β = 0.03(95 %CI = 0.01;0.05), p = 0.01), regional RT (β = 0.05(95 %CI = 0.02;0.09), p = 0.004), and concurrent chemotherapy (β = 0.04(95 %CI = 0.02;0.07), p = 0.001), were independent factors associated with increasing toxicity during the 7-week treatment period, adjusted for relevant covariates. None of the single items of GA, as well as the frailty screening instruments, were associated with increasing RIT.CONCLUSION: In this study, frailty and GA were not associated with additional RIT during treatment. These results suggest that (C)RT is equally tolerated in frail and non-frail patients, with respect to acute RIT. RT could be a suitable alternative to surgery in selected frail patients.

Objective: New techniques have emerged to aid in preventing inadequate margins in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) surgery, but studies comparing different techniques are lacking. Here, we compared narrow band imaging (NBI) with fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI), to study which intraoperative technique best assesses the mucosal tumour margins.Materials and Methods: NBI was performed in vivo and borders were marked with three sutures. For FMI, patients received 75 mg of unlabelled cetuximab followed by 15 mg cetuximab-800CW intravenously-two days prior to surgery. The FMI borders were defined on the excised specimen. The NBI borders were correlated with the FMI outline and histopathology.Results: Sixteen patients were included, resulting in 31 NBI and 30 FMI measurements. The mucosal border was delineated within 1 mm of the tumour border in 4/31 (13 %) of NBI and in 16/30 (53 %) FMI cases (p = 0.0008), and within 5 mm in 23/31 (74 %) of NBI and in 29/30 (97 %) of FMI cases (p = 0.0048). The median distance between the tumour border and the imaging border was significantly greater for NBI (3.2 mm, range −6.1 to 12.8 mm) than for FMI (0.9 mm, range −3.0 to 7.4 mm; p = 0.028). Submucosal extension and previous irradiation reduced NBI accuracy.Conclusion: Ex vivo FMI performed more accurately than in vivo NBI in mucosal margin assessment, mainly because NBI cannot detect submucosal extension. NBI adequately identified the mucosal margin especially in early-stage and not previously irradiated tumours, and may therefore be preferable in these tumours for practical and cost-related reasons.