Search

Abstract In the surgical management of oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) we aim to resect the tumour with clear margins in all planes. The aim of this study was to identify and compare overall survival in a group of 591 patients who had resections, and to relate this to the clearance of margins at the tumour bed. We used life tables to calculate survival at one, two, three, five, and 10 years after diagnosis by margin (clear = 5 mm or more; close = 2–5 mm; and involved = less than 2 mm). Kaplan–Meier curves were produced for the margins alone, which were defined as clear in 480 patients (81%), close in 63 (11%), and involved in 48 (8%). Five-year survival was 81%, 75%, and 54% for clear, close, and involved margins, respectively, which highlights the importance of clear margins for survival. There is a significant prognostic implication associated with close, and particularly with involved, margins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oral squamous cell carcinoma is the most common intraoral malignancy, for which we advocate radical primary resection with adjuvant treatment where indicated. The main aims of this paper are to identify the overall survival of a consecutive series of patients and to relate survival to clinical and pathological factors. Kaplan–Meier curves were produced for site, sex, TNM status, and use of postoperative radiotherapy. The data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows and probabilities of less than 0.05 were accepted as significant. A total of 921 patients were recorded in the database with a diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma out of a total of 1958 with salivary gland conditions or other cancers of the head and neck (43.1%). The earliest date of diagnosis was 1973, and the data were censored at 31 March 2016. The database comprised 340 women (36.9%) and 581 men (63.1%). A total of 339 patients died (34.5%): 117 women (33.7%) and 222 men (65.5%). The mean (range) age at death was 73.4 (31.4–97.5) years for women and 68.7 (33.3–95.5) years for men (t (337) = 3.28, p = 0.001). Our overall survival was somewhat better than the 56% five-year survival reported for oral cancer in England in 2010, which may be a reflection of the treatment. This work supports the view that aggressive management may improve overall survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is now widely accepted that cancer is a chronic disease, and in this context we have previously highlighted shortcomings in the assessment of problems with intimacy and sexuality in patients treated for cancer of the head and neck. In this paper we introduce established strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of psychosexual problems to support these patients, and describe our early experiences of their use. We include brief narratives and case reports to show how they have made a difference to patients and their partners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Problems with intimacy in patients with cancer of the head and neck may not be recognised. Our aim was to review published papers on patient-reported outcomes that record concerns about intimacy, sex, and function, to help develop a tool for use in head and neck cancer. We specifically looked for instruments with evidence of validation in patients with cancer, which could be used to identify problems with intimacy and sexuality. After evaluating 2563 papers, we identified 20 that satisfied our inclusion criteria, and these have been presented in a tabulated form. This review has shown the need to develop a questionnaire on intimacy that is specific to patients with cancer of the head and neck. It is an important issue that must be addressed by clinical and research teams, and will be done most effectively if it is linked to specific interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]