1. Differences between CeO2-doped sodium borate glass and Cu2O3-doped sodium borate glass in terms of structural defects concentration and plasmon frequency.
- Author
-
Gomaa, Hosam M., Saudi, H. A., Zahran, H. Y., and Yahia, I. S.
- Subjects
- *
BORATE glass , *GLASS construction , *BORAX , *RARE earth oxides , *INTEGRATED circuits , *TRANSITION metal oxides - Abstract
This qualitative work focuses on a comparison between the roles of a lanthanide oxide CeO2 and a transition metal oxide Cu2O3 when introduced to sodium borate glass. Two glass samples have been prepared using the fast quenching method, where two types of glasses were obtained: (i) copper-free/cerium-rich sodium borate glass, and (ii) cerium-free/copper-rich sodium borate glass. XRD patterns indicated the amorphous nature of the prepared samples regardless of the dopant type, either CeO2 or Cu2O3. The optical characterization showed that the CeO2-doped and Cu2O3-doped samples have the same Urbach energy, resonance frequency, and damping factor. But differ in the values of the transmittance, reflectance, plasmon frequency, and the concentration of the free charge carriers. The acquired results may recommend CeO2-doped borate glasses as major components in the field of data transfer materials, such as those used in the manufacture of computer chips, whereas Cu2O3-doped borate glasses were proposed for applications involving) attenuation of the low energy light (UV–VIS–NIR). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF