Search

Background: During a public health overdose emergency driven by fentanyl in British Columbia (BC), Canada, a parallel increase in concurrent use of methamphetamines may be contributing to the risk of overdose. Concurrent use refers to the use of stimulants and opioids one after the other, or together. Describing substance use practices and elucidating correlates of concurrent use can inform harm reduction service provision and prevent overdose events., Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed the 2019 Harm Reduction Client Survey administered at 22 harm reduction sites across BC and sampled individuals aged 19 and older. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models identified correlates of concurrent use of stimulants and opioids in the last three days., Results: The study sample was composed of 574 individuals who used stimulants and/or opioids, among whom 307 (53.5%) reported concurrent use. Compared with individuals who used stimulants and/or opioids separately, the odds of concurrent use were significantly increased (OR=2.74, 95%CI 1.71-4.51) while the adjusted odds were increased (aOR=1.79, 95%CI 0.98-3.34) among individuals who experienced an opioid overdose. Further, the adjusted odds of concurrent use decreased with every one-year increase in age (aOR=0.97, 95%CI 0.95-0.99), among individuals with paid work (aOR=0.58, 95%CI 0.33-0.99), and stable housing (aOR=0.61, 95%CI 0.37-1.02). The adjusted odds of concurrent use increased among individuals who used drugs daily (aOR=3.78, 95%CI 2.28-6.40), used tobacco (aOR=2.03, 95%CI 1.09-3.87), used benzodiazepines (aOR=3.72, 95%CI 1.76-8.41), owned a naloxone kit (aOR=1.94, 95%CI 1.15-3.31), used observed consumption sites (aOR=2.51, 95%CI 1.57-4.07), and were prescribed opioid agonist therapy (aOR=2.92, 95%CI 1.81-4.77)., Conclusions: Individuals who used stimulants and opioids concurrently tend to be younger, without paid work or housing. They were engaged in harm reduction and treatment services, yet used illicit drugs with unknown concentration daily. Improving access to age-appropriate services and expanding the availability of both legal and regulated stimulants and opioids may further reduce harms of concurrent use., Competing Interests: Declarations of Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Take-Home Naloxone programs have been introduced across North America in response to rising opioid overdose deaths. There is currently limited real-world data on bystander naloxone administration, overdose outcomes, and evidence related to adverse events following bystander naloxone administration., Methods: The research team used descriptive statistics from Take-Home Naloxone administration forms. We explored reported demographic variables and adverse events among people who received by-stander administered naloxone in a suspected opioid overdose event between August 31, 2012 and December 31, 2018 in British Columbia. We examined and contextualized differences across years given policy, program and drug toxicity changes. We used multivariate logistic regression to examine whether an association exists between number of ampoules of naloxone administered and the odds that the recipient will experience withdrawal symptoms., Results: A large majority (98.1%) of individuals who were administered naloxone survived their overdose and 69.2% had no or only mild withdrawal symptoms. Receiving three (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 1.64 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.08-2.48)) or four or more (AOR 2.19 (95% CI: 1.32-3.62)) ampoules of naloxone was significantly associated with odds of moderate or severe withdrawal compared to receiving one ampoule of naloxone., Conclusions: This study provides evidence from thousands of bystander reversed opioid overdoses using Take-Home Naloxone kits in British Columbia, and suggests bystander-administered naloxone is safe and effective for opioid overdose reversal. Data suggests an emphasis on titration during bystander naloxone training in situations where the person experiencing overdose can be adequately ventilated may help avoid severe withdrawal symptoms. We identified a decreasing trend in the likelihood of moderate or severe withdrawal over the study period., Competing Interests: Authors KP, SW and JB work for the BC Centre of Disease Control (BCCDC) an agency of the Provincial Health Services Authority; BCCDC is responsible for administering the BC take-home naloxone program which is funded by the BC Ministry of Health. The BC MoH had no input into the methods, analysis or writing of this manuscript. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Purpose: This study aims to describe knowledge of Canada's Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act (GSDOA) and take home naloxone (THN) training and kit possession among people being released from provincial correctional facilities in British Columbia., Design/methodology/approach: The authors conducted surveys with clients of the Unlocking the Gates Peer Health Mentoring program on their release. The authors compared the characteristics of people who had and had not heard of the GSDOA and who were in possession of a THN kit., Findings: In this study, 71% people had heard of the GSDOA, and 55.6% were in possession of a THN kit. This study found that 99% of people who had heard of the GSDOA indicated that they would call 911 if they saw an overdose. Among people who perceived themselves to be at risk of overdose, 28.3% did not have a THN kit. Only half (52%) of participants had a mobile phone, but 100% of those with a phone said they would call 911 if they witnessed an overdose., Originality/value: The authors found that people with knowledge of the GSDOA were likely to report that they would call 911 for help with an overdose. Education about the GSDOA should be a standard component of naloxone training in correctional facilities. More than one in four people at risk of overdose were released without a naloxone kit, highlighting opportunities for training and distribution. Access to a cellphone is important in enabling calls to 911 and should be included in discharge planning., (© Emerald Publishing Limited.)

Introduction: Rising overdose deaths are a devastating problem across the United States and Canada. Despite the availability of observed consumption sites in British Columbia (BC), data suggest people who use drugs (PWUD) alone in private residences are most at risk of overdose death. These individuals may not use consumption sites due to fear of stigmatization, lack of privacy, or personal preference. It is this population that would benefit from overdose monitoring alternatives., Methods: This 2018 study employed two sources of data. (1) A provincial harm reduction distribution site client survey administered at 27 sites across BC asked about cell phone possession and functionality. (2) Structured interviews with PWUD in Vancouver gathered perspectives regarding monitoring devices and alerting systems. Results : The client survey was administered to 486 individuals. Among 443 respondents, 48% ( n  = 212) owned a cellphone and 68% ( n  = 115) of individuals with a cellphone with access to internet ( n  = 168) would use an application to mitigate opioid-related overdose deaths. Thirty qualitative interviews were performed; thematic analysis of the responses identified three major themes - safety, public versus private drug use, and technological monitoring and function. The relevance of technological devices was affected by the inconsistent availability of cellphones, concerns about anonymity, as well as personal comfort while using drugs. Conclusions : Technological applications may not be suitable for clients with transient lifestyles, no permanent home, and lack of consistent access to a mobile device. Thorough needs assessments, considerations of lifestyle limitations, and understanding perceptions around cellphone and overdose monitoring can increase the potential that devices will be used.Highlights45% ( n = 219) of client survey respondents owned a cellphoneOut of cellphone owners, 59% ( n = 102) of client survey respondents had access to internetOf 168 with internet access, 68% willing to use any applications for overdose responseApplications not suitable for transient lifestyles, no permanent home, and lack of consistent access to cellphone.

Introduction: British Columbia's (BC) Take-Home Naloxone (THN) program provides naloxone to bystanders for use in cases of suspected opioid overdose. This study seeks to provide trends and analysis from the provincial BC THN program since inception in 2012 to the end of 2018., Materials and Methods: BC THN shipment and distribution records from 2012-2018 were retrieved. Frequency distributions were used to describe characteristics of individuals accessing the program. To evaluate correlates of distribution after the addition of hundreds of pharmacy distribution sites, an analytic sample was limited to records from 2018, and multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate correlates of collecting naloxone at a pharmacy site., Results: Since program inception to the end of 2018, there were 398,167 naloxone kits shipped to distribution sites, 149,999 kits reported distributed, and 40,903 kits reported used to reverse an overdose in BC. There was a significant increasing trend in the number of naloxone kits used to reverse an overdose over time (p<0.01), and more than 90% of kits that were reported used were distributed to persons at risk of an overdose. Individuals not personally at risk of overdose had higher odds of collecting naloxone at a pharmacy site, compared to other community sites (including harm reduction supply distribution sites, peer led organizations, drop-in centers, and supportive housing sites) (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 2.69; 95% CI: 2.50-2.90)., Conclusions: This study documents thousands of opioid overdose reversals facilitated through the BC THN program. While those at highest risk of overdose may preferentially access naloxone through community sites, naloxone distribution through pharmacies has allowed the BC THN program to expand dramatically, increasing naloxone availability through longer opening hours on evenings and weekends. and in rural and remote regions. A diversity of naloxone distribution sites and strategies is crucial to prevent rising opioid overdose deaths., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: North America is in the midst of an opioid overdose epidemic and it is commonly suggested that exposure to fentanyl is unknown. Using a provincial survey of harm reduction site clients, we aimed to characterize known and unknown fentanyl use and their correlates among people who use drugs in British Columbia, Canada., Methods: We recruited 486 clients who were >18 years old and 316 agreed to provide a urine sample for substance use testing. Reported known fentanyl use was defined as a three-level categorical variable assessing recent (i.e., in the previous three days) fentanyl exposure: (i) known exposure; (ii) unknown exposure; and (iii) no exposure. We also assessed any exposure to fentanyl (Yes vs. No) confirmed by urinalysis. Survey data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Multinomial logistic regression and modified Poisson regression models were built to examine different correlates of exposure to fentanyl., Results: Median age of the participants was 40 (IQR: 32-49). Out of the 303 eligible participants, 38.7% (117) reported known fentanyl use, 21.7% (66) had unknown fentanyl use, and 39.6% (120) had no recent fentanyl use. In the adjusted multinomial logistic regression model and in comparison with unknown fentanyl use, recent known fentanyl use was significantly associated with self-report of methadone use (aRRR = 3.18), heroin/morphine use (aRRR = 4.40), and crystal meth use (aRRR = 2.95). Moreover, any recent exposure to fentanyl (i.e., positive urine test for fentanyl) was significantly associated with living in urban settings (aPR = 1.49), and self-reporting recent cannabis use (aPR = 0.73), crystal meth (aPR = 1.45), and heroin/morphine use (aPR = 2.48)., Conclusion: The landscape of illicit opioid use is changing in BC and more people are using fentanyl knowingly. The increasing prevalence of known fentanyl use is concerning and calls for further investments in public awareness and public policy efforts regarding fentanyl exposure and risks., Competing Interests: Declarations of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In response to North America's opioid crisis, access to naloxone has increased. However, our understanding of the correlates of possessing a naloxone kit is limited. This study seeks to determine the prevalence and correlates of kit possession among people who use drugs (PWUD) in British Columbia (BC) Canada., Methods: This analysis used cross-sectional survey data collected in 2018 from 27 harm reduction sites in BC. Descriptive statistics and Poisson regression with robust error variance were used to examine factors associated with naloxone kit possession., Results: Overall, 70.7% (n = 246) of the total sample (n = 348) reported having a naloxone kit. Having a kit was significantly associated with self-reported opioid use in comparison with non-opioid use (Adjusted Prevalence Ratio (APR): 2.39; 95% CI: 1.33-4.32). Those reporting 'injection' as their preferred drug administration method were also more likely to possess a kit compared to those that predominantly preferred inhalation, smoking, or snorting (APR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.25-4.58). Urbanicity, age, gender, and having regular housing were not significantly associated with possessing a kit., Conclusions: This study is the first to examine naloxone kit possession across geographies, including non-urban areas. Lower kit possession among those that preferred inhaling, smoking or snorting drugs may reflect misconceptions around overdose risk of non-injection drug administration. Our study supports the need for enhanced awareness around the risk of opioid overdose with non-injection administration and suggests a need for comprehensive public health messaging that aims to address overdose risk and response., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)