Search

• This case series describes PRS-delivered behavioral activation to support MT. • Three cases were chosen to depict intervention adaption for varying presentations. • The PRS worked with each participant to implement value-driven, rewarding activities. • PRS shared experiences and intervention flexibility played key roles in pilot success. While methadone treatment (MT) is effective in treating opioid use disorder (OUD), retention remains an issue nationwide, especially among low-income, minoritized populations. Peer recovery specialists (PRSs), individuals with lived substance use experience, are particularly well suited to support vulnerable populations, though often are not trained in delivering evidence-based interventions. Thus, our team developed a Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation open-label pilot trial to evaluate the effectiveness of PRS-delivered BA (Peer Activate) in improving MT retention and establish feasibility, acceptability and PRS fidelity of the intervention. In this case series, we provide a more in-depth depiction of the adaption of Peer Activate and present three cases to illustrate how Peer Activate can be implemented among patients in routine MT care and adapted to meet the needs of varying clinical presentations. We include descriptive data on participant substance use and MT outcomes to supplement the narrative discussion. While varying participant presentations and needs presented challenges to the PRS interventionist, the PRS utilized his shared, lived substance use and recovery experiences and met participants where they were at, as well as successfully used BA techniques, ultimately leading to intervention success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the efficacy of methadone to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), retention is an urgent priority, particularly among low-income, minoritized populations. Peer recovery specialists are well-positioned to engage vulnerable patients, particularly when trained in an evidence-based intervention to promote retention. This hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot trial aimed to demonstrate the proof of concept of a peer recovery specialist-delivered behavioral activation and problem solving-based approach (Peer Activate) to improve methadone retention.Methods: Implementation outcomes included feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity. Feasibility and acceptability were defined by the percentage of participants who initiated the intervention (≥75%) and completed ≥75% of core sessions, respectively. Fidelity was assessed via independent rating of a randomly selected 20% of sessions. The primary effectiveness outcome was methadone retention at three-months post-intervention vs. a comparison cohort initiating methadone during the same time period. Secondary outcomes included methadone adherence, substance use frequency, and substance use-related problems.Results: Benchmarks for feasibility and acceptability were surpassed: 86.5% (32/37) initiated the intervention, and 81.3% of participants who initiated attended ≥75% of core sessions. The mean independent rater fidelity score was 87.9%, indicating high peer fidelity. For effectiveness outcomes, 88.6% of participants in Peer Activate were retained in methadone treatment at three-months post-intervention-28.9% higher than individuals initiating methadone treatment alone in the same time period [χ2(1) = 10.10, p = 0.001]. Among Peer Activate participants, urine-verified methadone adherence reached 97% at post-intervention, and there was a significant reduction in substance use frequency from 48% of past two-week days used at baseline to 31.9% at post-intervention [t(25) = 1.82, p = .041]. Among participants who completed the core Peer Activate sessions (n = 26), there was a significant reduction in substance use-related problems [t(21) = 1.84, p = 0.040].Conclusion: Given the rapid scale-up of peer recovery specialist programs nationwide and the urgent need to promote methadone retention, these results, although preliminary, have important potential clinical significance. The next steps are to conduct a Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized trial with a larger sample size and longer-term follow-up to further establish the implementation and effectiveness of the Peer Activate approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Patient perceived stigma is a barrier to treatment of opioid use disorder. • Interventions led by peer recovery specialists (PRS) may shift stigma. • This study evaluated shift in stigma during a PRS-delivered intervention. • There was a decrease in substance use (SU) but not methadone treatment (MT) stigma. • Decreases in stigma may serve to improve MT and other SU-related outcomes. Patients' perceptions and experiences of stigma related to substance use and methadone treatment are barriers to successful treatment of opioid use disorder, particularly among low-income and medically underserved populations. Interventions led by peer recovery specialists (PRSs) may shift stigma-related barriers. This study sought to evaluate shifts in substance use and methadone treatment stigma in the context of an evidence-based behavioral intervention adapted for PRS delivery to support methadone treatment outcomes. We recruited patients who had recently started methadone treatment or demonstrated difficulty with adherence from a community-based program (N = 37) for an open-label pilot study of a 12-session behavioral activation intervention led by a PRS interventionist. Participants completed substance use and methadone treatment stigma assessments and the SIP-R, a brief measure of problems related to substance use, at baseline, mid-point (approximately six weeks), and post-treatment (approximately 12 weeks). Generalized estimating equations assessed change in total stigma scores between baseline and post-treatment as well as change in stigma scores associated with change in SIP-R responses. There was a statistically significant decrease in substance use stigma (b(SE) =-0.0304 (0.0149); p = 0.042) from baseline to post-treatment, but not methadone treatment stigma (b(SE) =-0.00531 (0.0131); p = 0.68). Decreases in both substance use stigma (b(SE) =0.5564 (0.0842); p < 0.001) and methadone treatment stigma (b(SE) =0.3744 (0.1098); p < 0.001) were associated with a decrease in SIP-R scores. PRS-led interventions have potential to shift substance use stigma, which may be associated with decrease in problems related to substance use, and therefore merit further testing in the context of randomized controlled trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Despite efficacy, medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) engagement remains low. • Peer recovery specialists (PRS) are well-suited to support patients receiving MOUD. • There are few evidence-based interventions evaluated for PRS delivery. • Behavioral activation (BA) is effective in supporting treatment retention. • Qualitative results support feasibility and acceptability of PRS-delivered BA. Although medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are efficacious treatments for opioid use disorder, retention remains low. Peer recovery specialists (PRSs), individuals with lived substance use and recovery experience, may be particularly well-suited to support patients receiving MOUD. While PRSs are rarely trained in evidence-based behavioral interventions other than motivational interviewing, preliminary evidence suggests that peers can deliver brief behavioral interventions, such as behavioral activation, with efficacy and fidelity. This qualitative study sought to explore patient perspectives on receiving an adapted PRS-delivered behavioral activation intervention (Peer Activate) to support patients receiving methadone treatment. The sample (N = 26) included patients recently starting or demonstrating challenges with adherence at a community-based methadone treatment program who received the Peer Activate intervention in a pilot trial. Participants were invited to participate in in-depth, semi-structured interviews at study completion or discontinuation, assessing perceived acceptability and feasibility of Peer Activate , and stigma-related barriers. Interview transcripts were coded using codebook/template thematic analysis. Analysis revealed the importance of two areas to promote intervention acceptability: 1) connection with intervention content and skill building, and 2) valued PRS-specific qualities. Intervention flexibility was found to promote feasibility of the intervention in the context of chaotic and challenging life circumstances. Additionally, participants described stigma towards substance use and methadone treatment as potential barriers to engaging in methadone treatment. Results support the acceptability and feasibility to patients of this PRS-delivered behavioral activation intervention in the context of outpatient MOUD treatment among a low-income, majority racially minoritized patient population. Future intervention adaptation and implementation should focus on incorporating content related to relationships and interpersonal skills; balancing behavioral intervention content with system navigation support; maintaining flexibility; and further investigation of the impact of individual PRS attributes, including shared lived experiences, on intervention acceptability and shifts in stigma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Successful engagement with medication treatment for opioid use disorder is an important focus in reducing mortality associated with the opioid crisis. Mortality remains at unacceptably high levels, pointing to a need for improved understanding of factors that affect medication for opioid use disorder outcomes. This study aims to understand how barriers co-occur and interact to interfere with outcomes in methadone treatment for a low-income, underserved patient population with opioid use disorder. This study was conducted at a community-based drug treatment center that serves a predominately low-income, racially diverse population. Guided by the social-ecological framework, we analyzed semi-structured interviews and focus groups with patients and providers working in opioid use disorder care and recovery across Baltimore City (N = 32) to assess factors that influence methadone treatment outcomes, and how barriers co-occur and interact to worsen treatment outcomes. The study used patient-centered definitions to describe successful treatment outcomes. Barriers described by both patients and providers fit into several broad levels: individual, interpersonal, institutional, community, and stigma. Participants described co-occurrence of many barriers. Further, the study identified potential interactive effects, such that interrelated barriers were seen as fueling one another and having a deleterious effect on treatment outcomes. Specifically, interrelationships between barriers were described for 1) unstable housing with social influences and mental health factors; 2) transportation with poor physical health and other competing responsibilities; 3) treatment program policies and schedule with competing responsibilities; and 4) stigma with poor physical and mental health. Understanding barriers to successful medication for opioid use disorder outcomes and considering their co-occurrence may help to identify and promote interventions to mitigate their impact. This work is intended to guide future research to adapt conceptual frameworks for understanding psychosocial and structural barriers affecting opioid use disorder treatment and ultimately intervention efforts to improve treatment outcomes. • A social-ecological model was used to understand poor methadone treatment outcomes. • Barriers fit several broad levels: individual, interpersonal, institutional, and community. • Stigma was identified as a cross-cutting barrier across the above-mentioned levels. • Qualitative findings elucidated inter-relationships between barriers, across levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A substantial, national need exists for culturally acceptable, accessible opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is regarded as effective in treating OUD; however, retention in MOUD programs remains low nationally. One known barrier to MOUD retention is stigma, particularly within ethno-racial minority communities. Peer recovery specialists (PRSs), individuals with shared experience in substance use and recovery, may be particularly well suited to support patients in MOUD treatment, and may have capacity to play a key role in decreasing stigma-related barriers to MOUD retention.Methods: This study used qualitative methods to solicit feedback on how patients receiving methadone treatment (MT) experience stigma (i.e., toward substance use [SU] and MT). Study staff also gathered information regarding how a PRS role may reduce stigma and improve retention in care, including barriers and facilitators to the PRS role shifting stigma. Study staff conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews and focus groups (N = 32) with staff and patients receiving MT at an opioid treatment program as well as PRSs in Baltimore.Results: Participants identified experiences of internalized, as well as enacted and anticipated, MT and SU stigma, and described these as barriers to treatment. Participants also identified opportunities for PRSs to shift stigma-related barriers for patients receiving MT through unique aspects of the PRS role, such as their shared lived experience.Conclusions: Reducing stigma surrounding SUD and MT is critical for improving MOUD outcomes, and future research may consider how the PRS role can support this effort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]