Search

Introduction: This study evaluated 10-year results of implanting one iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent during cataract surgery in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension. Methods: This retrospective, non-randomized study examined 10-year outcomes of iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation with cataract surgery by one surgeon in eyes with OAG [including primary OAG (POAG) and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG)] or ocular hypertension at a multi-specialty German ophthalmology center. Study visits were conducted preoperatively and at 2.5, 3, 5, and 10 years postoperatively; examinations included intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA), and adverse events. Results: A total of 63 eyes of 45 patients with OAG (n = 60 eyes) or ocular hypertension (n = 3 eyes) and data through 10 years were analyzed. Mean preoperative IOP was 18.6 ± 4.4 mmHg on 1.83 ± 1.03 mean medications. At study visits through 10 years postoperative, mean IOP reduced by 12.9–19.0% (p < 0.005 at all points), and mean medication burden reduced by 37.8–51.4% (p ≤ 0.006 at all points). At 10 years postoperatively, 77.8% of eyes had IOP ≤ 18 mmHg and 47.6% had IOP ≤ 15 mmHg (vs. 50.8% and 25.4% preoperatively, respectively; p = 0.016). One-third (33.3%) of eyes were medication-free vs. 3.2% preoperatively (p < 0.001); 17.5% were on 2–5 medications (vs. 55.6% preoperatively, p = 0.005); and 93.7% of eyes were on the same or fewer medications vs. preoperative. Post-phacoemulsification CDVA improvement was maintained; no filtering surgeries were completed over 10-year follow-up. Conclusions: Significant and safe IOP and medication reductions were observed through 10 years after iStent implantation with cataract surgery in patients with OAG or ocular hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study reports the long-term intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of a single trabecular microbypass stent (iStent®; Glaukos Corp., San Clemente, CA, USA) for medically controlled open-angle glaucoma in Korean patients. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 42 eyes of 35 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). All subjects underwent single first-generation iStent® implantation with phacoemulsification by a single surgeon with 5 years follow-up. The primary outcomes were changes in IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications compared to the preoperative values. The secondary outcome was the proportion of eyes with IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without medication, ≤ 15 mmHg without medication, and ≤ 18 mmHg with or without medication. Adverse events and need for secondary glaucoma surgery were also recorded. Results: The mean IOP decreased from 15.8 ± 2.8 to 13.8 ± 1.7 mmHg and the mean number of medications was reduced from 2.24 ± 1.18 to 0.83 ± 1.12, respectively, at year 5. At 3 and 5 years, 80.6% and 78.6% of eyes, respectively, were receiving fewer medications than preoperative numbers. In contrast, only 50% of eyes on four preoperative medications showed medication reductions at 5 years. At years 3 and 5, 61.3% and 53.5% of eyes achieved IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without medication, whereas 90.3% and 89.3% of eyes achieved ≤ 18 mmHg regardless of medication use, respectively. Four eyes required additional glaucoma surgery (two Ahmed glaucoma valve implantations, one trabeculectomy, and one XEN 45 Gel Stent implantation), and all were receiving four preoperative antiglaucoma medications. Transient IOP elevation (14.3%) was the most common complication, followed by five hyphema, one stent obstruction, one stent malposition, and one severe anterior chamber reaction. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a good safety profile and sustained IOP reduction after the implantation of a single trabecular microbypass stent (iStent®) with phacoemulsification in Korean patients. The majority of subjects with POAG showed a relatively good response; however, eyes receiving a higher number of medications preoperatively (especially four medications) had difficulty achieving a low target IOP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes between ab interno trabeculotomy (LOT) and iStent inject W implantation (iStent) both combined with cataract surgery, matching the background factors including age, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication score, central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length. Methods: A total of 100 eyes from 75/79 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were included in the LOT/iStent groups. The background factors were matched between the two groups using the propensity score. Results: There were no significant differences in age, IOP, medication score, CCT, and axial length, preoperatively. The postoperative medication scores were 1.3 ± 1.2 and 1.2 ± 1.2 in the LOT and iStent groups. The postoperative IOPs were 12.8 ± 2.8 and 13.1 ± 2.4 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the medication score were − 0.64 ± 1.4 and − 0.44 ± 1.6 in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the IOP were − 2.1 ± 3.3 and − 1.5 ± 3.0 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. These values were not significantly different between the two groups. The postoperative IOP and changes in the IOP were significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications (hyphema, 11.0% and 6.0%, and transient ocular hypertension, 8.0% and 5.0%, in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively). Conclusion: LOT and iStent have similar surgical outcomes with sufficient safety. Postoperative IOP was significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT in both groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This prospective, non-randomized, interventional clinical study evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of first-generation iStent bypass implantation versus ab externo canaloplasty, both combined with phacoemulsification, in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) after 12-month follow-up. A total of 138 patients with POAG and their 138 eyes (69 phaco-iStent and 69 phacocanaloplasty) were included. Postoperatively at 12 months, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased from 18.44 ± 3.88 to 15.51 ± 2.50 mmHg and from 17.20 ± 4.04 to 14.97 ± 2.37 mmHg in the phaco-iStent (PiS) and phacocanaloplasty (PC) groups, respectively (p = 0.480). In both groups, 35.7% achieved >20% IOP reduction from baseline. A total of 86% and 71.4% of the eyes were medication-free at 12 months in the PiS and PC groups, respectively. In both groups, all eyes showed improvement in best-corrected visual acuity compared with baseline and demonstrated similar safety profiles throughout the 12-month follow-up period. This study showed equal hypotensive effects of PiS and PC. Both procedures significantly reduced the IOP and the requirement for IOP-lowering medications for at least 12 months postoperatively, with no significant differences between the groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of one trabecular microbypass stent (first generation iStent) combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery (phaco) in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in a Taiwanese population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One trabecular microbypass stent was implanted after phacoemulsification cataract surgery by one surgeon. Intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, corrected distance visual acuity, complications, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: This case series included 28 eyes of 25 patients with OAG (19 primary open-angle glaucoma [POAG] and 9 normal tension glaucoma [NTG]). None had previous trabeculectomy or laser trabeculoplasty. At 1 year, the mean IOP decreased from 19.34 ± 3.92 mmHg to 15.84 ± 3.05 mmHg, and the mean number of glaucoma medications decreased from 1.82 ± 1.12 to 0.79 ± 1.17 (both P < 0.001). Longer survival was observed in the NTG eyes (NTG: 11.67 ± 1.00 months, POAG: 9.53 ± 3.78 months, P = 0.031). iStent reposition was performed in one eye, and four eyes received laser treatment for stent occlusion. None had secondary glaucoma surgery. CONCLUSION: Combined phacoemulsification and iStent implantations are a safe and effective way in reducing IOP and medication burden in patients with OAG, especially NTG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has revolutionized glaucoma care with its favorable safety profile and ability to delay or minimize the need for traditional, bleb-based procedures. Microstent device implantation is a type of angle-based MIGS, which reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) through bypass of the juxtacanalicular trabecular meshwork (TM) and facilitation of aqueous outflow into the Schlemm's canal. Although there are limited microstent devices on the market, multiple studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of iStent® (Glaukos Corp.), iStent Inject® (Glaukos Corp.), and Hydrus® Microstent (Alcon) in the treatment of mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma, with and without concurrent phacoemulsification. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive evaluation of injectable angle-based microstent MIGS devices in the treatment of glaucoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We report a case with two connected stents ejected simultaneously during an iStent inject W surgery, a modified second-generation iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass System. Case presentation: A 57-year-old woman with primary open-angle glaucoma underwent a combined cataract and iStent inject W surgery in her left eye. After the trabecular meshwork/Schlemm's canal was pierced by the trocar of injector, the delivery button was pressed a first time, but the stent was not ejected. After the button was pressed a second time, connected two stents were ejected. After removing the dislocated stents from the anterior chamber, two stents were implanted into the desired places using another injector. Except for mild hyphema, no postoperative complication occurred. Stereomicroscopic observation showed that the two stents were connected by a broken trocar shaft. An X-ray showed that the trocar shaft was broken at the part referred to as the "sprayed trocar". Scanning electron microscopy showed that the surface features of the broken trocar and trocar tip represented tensile failure. Conclusions: Although rare, considering that the damage was seen at the structurally weak part (i.e., sprayed trocar), the same phenomenon can happen. For patient safety, surgeons are recommended to inspect the device when the deployment of either the first or second stent is unsuccessful during the iStent inject surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Evaluate effectiveness and safety outcomes for patients treated with canaloplasty and trabeculotomy previously treated with a trabecular microbypass stent (TBS). Methods: Retrospective, multicenter, IRB approved study. Patients treated with TBS (iStent/iStent inject, Glaukos) and subsequently with OMNI surgical system (OSS) (Sight Sciences). From 5 practices in 5 US states. Open-angle glaucoma (OAG), minimum 3 months follow-up after OSS surgery, Pre-OSS IOP ≥ 17 mmHg on ≥ 1 medication. No glaucoma procedures between TBS and OSS. Endpoints: proportion with ≥ 20% reduction in IOP, IOP between 6 and 18 mmHg, mean IOP, change in IOP, mean number of medications. Adverse events and secondary surgical interventions (SSI). Mann–Whitney rank sum test compared pre-OSS IOP and medications with follow-up. Results: Twenty seven patients. Average age (SD) 72.2 (10.8), 22/27 primary OAG (82%), mean MD − 6.2 (7.0) dB. Mean IOP before OSS 22.3 (4.3) mmHg on 2.2 (1.3) medications. At last follow-up (mean 11 months) IOP was 17.2 mmHg on 1.8 medications, − 5.1 mmHg (− 23%, p <.001), − 0.4 meds (− 18%, p =.193); ≥ 20% IOP reduction (41%), IOP ≤ 18 (56%). Adverse events were non-serious. Hyphema > 1 mm (3, 11%), BCVA decrease (4, 15%), IOP spike (2, 7%). SSI (4, 15%) had higher pre-OSS IOP (23.4 mmHg) and worse MD (− 9.6 dB). Conclusion: Patients uncontrolled by medication and a prior TBS would once have been candidates for trabeculectomy and tube shunts. OSS offered a minimally invasive option that provided IOP control and avoidance of traditional surgery for the majority over follow-up averaging 11 months and up to 42 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

aime E Dickerson Jr,4,5 Dan Q Nguyen61Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute, Indiana School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 2Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, England, UK; 3Valid Insight, Macclesfield, England, UK; 4Sight Sciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA; 5North Texas Eye Research Institute, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; 6Mid-Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Crewe, UKCorrespondence: Francesca Torelli, Valid Insight, Ropewalks, Newton St, Macclesfield, SK11 6QJ, UK, Tel +44 203 750 9833 Ext 703, Email [email protected] Introduction: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) are increasingly used options for mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG) care. While most MIGS devices are indicated for use in combination with cataract surgery only, with phacoemulsification playing a role in lowering IOP, newer technologies can also be used as standalone glaucoma surgery. Methods: This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to assess the clinical, economic, and humanistic outcomes of MIGS and SLT for the treatment of OAG and was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies that assessed MIGS or SLT in at least one treatment arm versus any other glaucoma treatment in adults with mild-to-moderate OAG were included. Clinical, humanistic (health-related quality of life [HRQoL] and patient burden), and economic data were extracted, and the methodological quality of included studies was evaluated. Results: A total of 2720 articles were screened, and 81 publications were included. Fifty-eight reported clinical outcomes. The majority assessed iStent or iStent inject (n=41), followed by OMNI (n=9), gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) or the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) (n=7), Hydrus (n=6), SLT (n=5), Xen Gel Stent (n=2), PreserFlo (n=1), and iTrack (n=1). IOP reduction was observed across prospective studies, varying from − 31% to − 13.7% at month 6 and from − 39% to − 11.4% at year 1 versus baseline. Most adverse events were transient and non-serious. Limited humanistic and economic data were identified. Conclusion: Given their established efficacy and safety, there is a rationale for wider use of MIGS in mild-to-moderate OAG. Of the MIGS devices, iStent and OMNI have the largest clinical evidence base supporting their sustained effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We report 2-year outcomes after implantation of iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification, in Japanese patients with mild–moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods: This was a 24-month, prospective, longitudinal, observational, post-marketing study conducted between July 2017 and September 2020. Patients consisted of adults with OAG on antiglaucoma medications who had cataract surgery combined with one iStent implantation. Outcome measures included intraocular pressure (IOP), antiglaucoma medications, treatment success rates (defined as eyes having lower IOP with same or reduced number of medications from baseline, or same IOP with reduced number of medications from baseline, and not requiring secondary glaucoma surgeries postoperatively), and safety. Outcomes were analyzed in the overall cohort and in glaucoma subtypes: primary OAG, normal-tension glaucoma, and exfoliative glaucoma. Results: Overall, 232 eyes were enrolled. At 24 months, mean ± standard deviation IOP decreased from 17.6 ± 4.0 mmHg preoperatively to 14.3 ± 3.0 mmHg (p < 0.05), and mean number of medications reduced from 2.2 ± 1.2 preoperatively to 0.7 ± 1.2 (p < 0.05). Similar trends were observed across glaucoma subtypes. In the overall cohort, 96.7%, 95.3%, and 93.7% of patients achieved treatment success at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. There were 67.6% medication-free eyes at 24 months compared to 3.2% medication-free eyes preoperatively (p < 0.0001). Safety profile was favorable over the 2-year period. Conclusions: Following iStent implantation with phacoemulsification, clinically relevant and statistically significant reductions in IOP and number of medications were observed in Japanese eyes with OAG over 2 years, with favorable safety profile. These reductions were observed across all glaucoma subtypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This retrospective consecutive study compared standalone implantation of multiple (2–3) trabecular micro-bypass stents (iStent inject ± iStent) (Multi-Stent group) vs trabeculectomy + mitomycin C (Trab group) in moderate to severe open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods: Eligible patients underwent Multi-Stent or Trab surgery from 2018 to 2020 and had at least 3-month follow-up; visual field mean deviation (VF MD) − 6 dB or worse; inadequate prior response to maximum medications ± laser procedures; and had trabeculectomy as their next planned intervention. Primary effectiveness, safety-adjusted treatment success, was defined as ≥ 20% intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction on the same or fewer medications, without clinically significant safety events (severe complications, secondary surgeries, reinterventions). Secondary effectiveness included mean IOP and medications; qualified and complete attainment of target IOP (≤ 21/18/15/12 mmHg and > 6 mmHg); health-economic and quality-of-life (QoL) measures; and 2-vs-3-stent subgroup analysis. Results: The baseline groups (n = 70 Multi-Stent/40 Trab) were similar: mean IOP (21.1 mmHg/22.3 mmHg); medications (2.87/3.10 medications); disease stage (30%/35% severe); VF MD (− 10.1 dB/− 10.4 dB); and mean last follow-up (LFU, 13.1 months/15.7 months) (all differences non-significant). Primary effectiveness: treatment success at LFU was 62.9% vs 30.0% in Multi-Stent vs Trab eyes, respectively (p = 0.001). Secondary effectiveness: At LFU in Multi-Stent vs Trab groups, respectively: mean IOP decreased by 31% to 14.2 mmHg (p < 0.001) vs by 43% to 12.5 mmHg (p < 0.001); mean medications decreased by 51% to 1.31 medications (p < 0.001) vs by 84% to 0.43 medications (p < 0.001). Multi-Stent eyes, compared to Trab eyes, had fewer visits ± reinterventions within 3 months (3.6 vs 6.1, p < 0.001); longer time to first reintervention (12.2 months vs 4.5 months, p = 0.01); fewer total reinterventions (0.26 vs 0.75, p = 0.006); and earlier lifting of postoperative restrictions (12.6 vs 32.1 days, p < 0.001). In 2-vs-3-stent analysis, there was a trend toward more 3-stent eyes achieving target IOP than 2-stent eyes. Visual fields remained stable in both Multi-Stent and Trab eyes. Conclusion: Implanting 2–3 trabecular micro-bypass stents was a viable alternative to trabeculectomy for moderate-to-severe OAG, with clinically appropriate IOP/medication reductions and higher safety-adjusted treatment success vs trabeculectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This retrospective comparative study assessed real-world effectiveness and safety of first-generation (iStent®) and second-generation (iStent inject®) trabecular micro-bypass stents with cataract surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Material and Methods: Through a 24-month postoperative follow-up, the effectiveness was quantified by intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction; mean glaucoma medication reduction; proportional analysis of eyes meeting IOP cutoffs (< 18, < 15, < 12 mmHg) either with or without medications; and proportional analysis of medication burden. Safety measures included visual acuity, adverse events, and secondary surgery. Results: A total of 82 consecutive eyes (39 iStent, 43 iStent inject) with a 24-month follow-up were analyzed. Most eyes (74.4%) had primary open-angle glaucoma, with the remainder having pseudoexfoliative or pigmentary glaucoma; all eyes had mild-to-moderate disease. At 24 months postoperative, the mean IOP was lower, and the percent reduction from baseline was greater, in iStent inject eyes (26.0% reduction, 17.7mmHg to 13.1mmHg) than in iStent eyes (9.8% reduction, 16.4mmHg to 14.8mmHg) (between-groups comparison, p=0.019). Within each group, the postoperative IOP reduction was greater in eyes with higher baseline IOP (p< 0.001). Medication burden decreased significantly in both groups, from 1.74 to 0.51 mean medications for iStent (70.7% reduction, p< 0.0001), and 2.19 to 0.65 for iStent inject (70.3% reduction, p< 0.0001). Both groups exhibited excellent safety. Conclusion: iStent or iStent inject with phacoemulsification produced significant IOP and medication reductions, with effects enduring for two years. IOP reductions were greater for iStent inject than for iStent. Within each group, higher preoperative IOP was associated with greater postoperative IOP reduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess 5-year effectiveness and safety of 2 iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stents in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) not controlled on 1 medication. This prospective, interventional, single-arm, multi-surgeon study (NCT #1252862, clinicaltrials.gov) enrolled eyes with OAG, preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) of 18–30 mmHg on 1 ocular hypotensive medication, and 22–38 mmHg after medication washout. Eyes underwent standalone implantation of 2 iStent devices and were followed through 60 months postoperatively. Efficacy was quantified by mean diurnal IOP and medication usage. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of eyes with ≥20% IOP reduction versus baseline unmedicated IOP (primary efficacy), and the proportion of eyes with IOP ≤18 mmHg (secondary efficacy) without medication or secondary glaucoma surgery. Safety parameters included visual acuity, cup-to-disc ratio, visual field, and complications and adverse events. Preoperative mean IOP on 1 medication was 20.6 ± 2.0 mmHg and post-washout unmedicated IOP was 24.1 ± 1.4 mmHg (n = 39). At 5 years postoperative, medication-free mean diurnal IOP reduced to 14.5 ± 2.2 mmHg, constituting a 40% decrease versus preoperative washed-out IOP (p <.0001). In addition, this 5-year medication-free IOP constituted a 30% decrease versus preoperative IOP on 1 medication (p <.0001). At Month 60, 89.7% (26/29) of eyes achieved the primary efficacy endpoint of ≥20% IOP reduction versus baseline unmedicated IOP, and 86.2% (25/29) of eyes achieved the secondary efficacy endpoint of IOP ≤18 mmHg, without medication or secondary glaucoma surgery. Throughout follow-up, 89.7–91.3% of eyes were on no medications. Favorable safety included no secondary glaucoma surgeries, minimal adverse events, and stable visual acuity, cup-to-disc ratio, and visual fields through 5 years postoperative. This prospective interventional study demonstrates persistent 5-year reductions in IOP and freedom from medications, together with favorable safety, following implantation of 2 first-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents in eyes with OAG on 1 preoperative medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Use of the trabecular micro‐bypass stent with cataract surgery is well established to be safe and effective in primary open‐angle glaucoma. This is the first study to exclusively evaluate use of the device in pigmentary glaucoma. Background: This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of a trabecular micro‐bypass stent in combination with cataract surgery in pigmentary glaucoma. Design: Retrospective, consecutive case series. Participants: Twenty‐four eyes of 12 patients with pigmentary glaucoma implanted with one trabecular micro‐bypass stent with concomitant cataract surgery. Methods: Baseline data was collected and compared to the following postoperative time points: 1 day, 1 week, 1 month out to 36 months (M36) after the procedure. Main Outcome Measures: These included intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications and need for additional surgery. Results: At M36 there was a 25% reduction in IOP to 14.68 ± 3.0 (P <.01) from 19.50 ± 6.7 mmHg at baseline. The mean number of glaucoma medications was 0.75 ± 1.0 prior to the surgery and 0.59 ± 0.6 (P >.05) at 36 M. At the 36 M time‐point, 95% of eyes had IOP ≤ 18 mmHg and 68% of eyes were ≤ 15 mmHg. No eyes underwent a secondary glaucoma procedure. Conclusions and Relevance: The insertion of a single trabecular micro‐bypass stent in combination with cataract surgery effectively provides a sustained reduction in IOP up to 3 years after surgery in patients with pigmentary glaucoma. The safety profile is favourable with low rate of IOP spikes and no patients requiring additional surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This real-world retrospective case series assessed 12-month effectiveness and safety following implantation of iStent® or iStent inject® trabecular micro-bypass with cataract surgery. Methods: Consecutive patients were implanted with either iStent (comprising 1 stent) or iStent inject (comprising 2 stents), together with cataract surgery. Most patients had primary open-angle glaucoma. Effectiveness outcomes through 12 months included intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma medications. Proportional analyses were completed for eyes achieving IOP ≤ 18 mmHg, IOP ≤ 15 mmHg, or IOP reduction ≥ 20% from preoperative; and eyes on 0 medications or ≥ 2 medications. Safety outcomes included adverse events, secondary surgeries, visual acuity, and visual fields. Results: This analysis included 137 eyes (67 iStent, 70 iStent inject) with cataract and mild to moderate glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Over 73% of eyes in both groups had early disease, and ~ 22% had prior glaucoma surgery. At 12 months postoperatively, mean IOP decreased from 18.4 ± 4.2 mmHg to 14.2 ± 2.5 mmHg in iStent eyes (p < 0.0001), and from 20.4 ± 5.6 mmHg to 14.4 ± 2.1 mmHg in iStent inject eyes (p < 0.0001). The IOP reduction was significantly greater for iStent inject eyes than iStent eyes (6.0 mmHg versus 4.2 mmHg reduction, p = 0.034). Both groups had high proportions of patients achieving the 12-month IOP endpoints, although consistently greater proportions reached these endpoints after iStent inject than iStent: 95.7% versus 92.5% had IOP ≤ 18 mmHg, respectively; 74.3% versus 71.6% had IOP ≤ 15 mmHg, respectively; and 68.6% versus 62.7% had IOP reduction ≥ 20% from baseline, respectively. Mean medication burden at 12 months decreased from 1.8 ± 0.7 to 0.3 ± 0.5 medications in iStent eyes (84.0% reduction, p < 0.0001), and from 1.3 ± 0.9 to 0.1 ± 0.3 medications in iStent inject eyes (94.7% reduction, p < 0.0001). Significantly more iStent inject eyes were medication-free at 12 months than iStent eyes (92.9% versus 76.1% medication-free, respectively; p = 0.0068). Favorable safety included few adverse events, no secondary glaucoma surgeries, and stable visual acuity and visual fields in both groups. Conclusion: Significant and safe IOP and medication reductions were achieved through 12 months after iStent or iStent inject implantation with cataract surgery. iStent inject eyes had greater absolute IOP reduction and more eyes medication-free versus iStent eyes. Funding: Glaukos Corporation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery has gained significant traction in recent years. This study evaluates the first‐ and second‐generation trabecular micro‐bypass stents "iStent" and "iStent inject". Background: To evaluate and compare the effect of a single iStent and double iStent inject in primary open angle glaucoma. Design Prospective comparative case series. Participants: Primary open angle glaucoma patients undergoing trabecular micro‐bypass stent insertion combined with cataract surgery. Methods: Baseline demographic information, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes including intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, reliance on glaucoma medication and complications were collected and analysed. Main Outcome Measures: Primary, secondary and tertiary outcome measures were consecutively defined as an IOP of ≤18 mmHg with zero medications, an IOP of ≤18 mmHg with reduced medications or a 20% reduction in IOP with or without medication. Results: The study comprised 145 eyes in the iStent and 100 eyes in the iStent inject group. At 12 months, 56.0% of the iStent and 51.3% of the iStent inject eyes had achieved primary success and 63.1% and 57.7% secondary success. The mean postoperative IOP was 16.6 mmHg in iStent and 16.9 mmHg in iStent inject. Survival analysis demonstrated a greater incidence of failure in the iStent inject beyond 5 months. Conclusions and Relevance: Both trabecular micro‐bypass stents in this study were effective in reducing IOP and the burden of medication when combined with cataract surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups across our outcome measures although the iStent inject required earlier recommencement of medications for optimal IOP control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To present long-term, real-world outcomes after implanting one trabecular micro-bypass stent with cataract surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in a predominantly Hispanic patient population. Patients and methods: This retrospective, consecutive case series evaluated intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, and safety through 36 months after implanting one iStent®, during phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Eyes were stratified into 2 subgroups classified by preoperative IOP and surgical goal. The Controlled Group had IOP <18 mmHg on ≥1 medications, and goal to reduce medications. The Uncontrolled Group had IOP ≥18 mmHg and/or maximum tolerated medication load, and goal to reduce IOP. Assessments included IOP, medications, visual fields (VF), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL), adverse events, and secondary surgeries. Results: Of 168 total operated eyes, 87 eyes (49 Controlled, 38 Uncontrolled) completed 36 months of follow-up and comprise the Consistent Cohort in this report. At baseline, 79.6% (39/49) of Controlled eyes and 71.1% (27/38) of Uncontrolled eyes were from Hispanic patients. In the Controlled Group desiring medication reduction, mean medications were reduced by 77.3% (2.6 medications preoperatively vs 0.6 at 36 months; p<0.001. All Controlled eyes maintained or reduced medications versus preoperative; no eyes were on ≥3 medications (vs 61.2% preoperatively); and 58.3% were medication-free (vs 0% preoperatively). In the Uncontrolled Group desiring IOP reduction, mean IOP decreased by 31.2% (19.4 mmHg preoperatively vs 13.4 mmHg at 36 months; p<0.001), 91.7% of eyes achieved IOP ≤18 mmHg, 69.4% reached IOP ≤15 mmHg, and 77.8% decreased IOP ≥20% vs baseline. Uncontrolled eyes also experienced a 45.3% medication reduction (2.2 medications preoperatively vs 1.2 at 36 months; p<0.001). Favorable safety included no intraoperative complications, and stable VF and RNFL through 36 months. Conclusion: In this predominantly Hispanic patient cohort, significant IOP and medication reductions were sustained safely through 36 months after iStent implantation during cataract surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Primary open-angle glaucoma is estimated to affect 3% of the population aged 40-80 years. Trabeculectomy is considered the gold standard in surgical management of glaucoma; however, it is a technically complex procedure that may result in a range of adverse outcomes. Device-augmented, minimally invasive procedures (micro-invasive glaucoma surgeries, MIGS) have been developed aiming for safer and less invasive intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction compared with traditional surgery.Methods: This paper presents results from a systematic literature review conducted in accordance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence requirements for the Medical Technology Evaluation Programme via multiple databases from 2005 to 2016. For clinical outcomes, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing MIGS with trabeculectomy or other therapies, observational studies, and other non-RCTs were included. Clinical outcomes reviewed were the change from baseline in mean IOP levels and change in topical glaucoma medication. Safety was assessed by reported harm and adverse events. For economic evidence, trials on cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, cost-benefit, cost-consequences, cost-minimization, cost of illness, and specific procedure costs were included. Risk of bias was assessed for clinical studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.Results: A total of nine RCTs (seven iStents®, one Hydrus®, and one CyPass®), seven non-RCTs (three iStent®, three CyPass®, and one Hydrus®), and 23 economic studies were analyzed. While various forms of trabeculectomy can achieve postoperative IOP of between 11.0 and 13.0 mmHg, MIGS devices described in this review were typically associated with higher postoperative IOP levels. In addition, MIGS devices may result in increased hypotony rates or bleb needling in subconjunctival placed devices, requiring additional medical resources to manage. There is limited available evidence on the cost-effectiveness of MIGS and therefore it remains unclear whether the cost of using MIGS is outweighed by cost savings through decreased medication and need for further interventions.Conclusion: Larger randomized trials and real-world observational studies are needed for MIGS devices to better assess clinical and economic effectiveness. Given the shortage of published data and increasing use of such procedures, living systematic reviews may help to provide ongoing and timely evidence-based direction for clinicians and decision makers. This review highlights the current unmet need for treatments that are easy to implement and reduce long-term IOP levels without increasing postoperative aftercare and cost.Funding: Santen GmbH, Germany. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the iStent trabecular microbypass stent in combination with cataract surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods: Retrospective, consecutive case series from October 2012 to December 2015 with no exclusion criteria. The series comprised of 350 eyes with OAG and cataract. Data were collected both preoperatively and postoperatively at day 1 week 1, months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24. Data included intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, visual acuity, the incidence of postoperative IOP pressure spikes of greater than ≥15 mmHg at any time point, and need for additional surgery. Results: The mean preoperative IOP was 19.13±6.34 mmHg. At 2 years postoperation, mean IOP was 15.17±3.53 mmHg (P<0.0001). The mean number of glaucoma medications was 1.19±1.00 preoperatively and 0.61±0.96 (P<0.0001) at 2 years postoperation. At 1 day postoperatively, 31 eyes (12.4%) experienced an IOP increase of 15 mmHg above their baseline IOP that responded to topical therapy. Two patients required additional tube shunt surgery. Conclusion: The insertion of the iStent trabecular microbypass stent in combination with cataract surgery effectively lowers IOP in OAG patients. The magnitude of IOP reduction was more significant in patients with higher preoperative pressure. Medication use was also significantly reduced postoperatively. The safety profile appears favorable with a low rate of IOP spikes and only two eyes (<1%) requiring additional surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of one, two, or three trabecular microbypass stents in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (OAG) not controlled on ocular hypotensive medication. A total of 119 subjects were followed for 18 months postoperatively. Materials and methods: Subjects with medicated intraocular pressure (IOP) 18-30 mmHg and postmedication-washout baseline IOP 22-38 mmHg were randomized to implantation of one, two, or three stents. Ocular hypotensive medication was to be used if postoperative IOP exceeded 18 mmHg. Results: A total of 38 subjects were implanted with one stent, 41 subjects with two stents, and 40 subjects with three stents. Both month 12 IOP reduction ≥20% without ocular hypotensive medication vs baseline unmedicated IOP and month 12 unmedicated IOP ≤18 mmHg were achieved by 89.2%, 90.2%, and 92.1% of one-, two-, and three-stent eyes, respectively. Furthermore, 64.9%, 85.4%, and 92.1% of the three respective groups achieved unmedicated IOP ≤15 mmHg. Over the 18-month follow-up period, medication was required in seven one-stent subjects, four two-stent subjects, and three three-stent subjects. At 18 months, mean unmedicated IOP was 15.9±0.9 mmHg in one-stent subjects, 14.1±1.0 mmHg in two-stent subjects, and 12.2±1.1 mmHg in three-stent subjects. Month 18 IOP reduction was significantly greater (P<0.001) with implantation of each additional stent, with mean differences in reduction of 1.84 mmHg (95% confidence interval 0.96-2.73) for three-stent vs two-stent groups and 1.73 mmHg (95% confidence interval 0.83-2.64) for two-stent vs one-stent groups. Adverse events through 18 months were limited to cataract progression with best-corrected visual acuity loss and subsequent cataract surgery. Conclusion: In this series, implantation of each additional stent resulted in significantly greater IOP reduction with reduced medication use. Titratability of stents as a sole procedure was shown to be effective and safe, with sustained effect through 18 months postoperatively in OAG not controlled with medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background To evaluate the 6-month efficacy and safety of the iStent microtrabecular bypass stent in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Design A prospective, uncontrolled, interventional case series. Participants Forty-four eyes with open-angle glaucoma were reported. Methods All subjects underwent ab interno implantation of a single iStent together with ( n = 40) or without ( n = 4) cataract surgery. Main Outcome Measures Patients were assessed at postoperative week 1, months 1 and 3, and quarterly, thereafter. Data collected included visual acuity, intraocular pressure measurement using Goldmann tonometry, number of glaucoma medications, and number and type of complications. Results The mean age of the sample was 76.8 years. The mean duration since glaucoma diagnosis was 5.3 years (standard deviation 2.9 years). The mean visual acuity was 0.53 logMAR at baseline that improved to 0.23 at 6 months postoperatively. The mean baseline intraocular pressure was 21.1 mm Hg, and this decreased significantly to 16.7 mm Hg at 6 months ( P < 0.01). The mean number of drops prescribed preoperatively was 2.3, which decreased to 0.6 at 6 months ( P < 0.01). Sixty-six per cent of patients were drop-free at 6 months. One patient developed an hyphaema following surgery; no other adverse events were recorded. Conclusions The iStent proved to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with open-angle glaucoma over our 6-month follow up period. Insertion resulted in a significant decrease in intraocular pressure as well as the number of topical antiglaucoma medications required for adequate intraocular pressure control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the paper was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive antiglaucoma procedures: Canaloplasty and iStent bypass implantation with and without phacoemulsification in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). A systematic review of the recent literature was performed based on the PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus databases. The effectiveness of the procedures was evaluated based on the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) and the amount of antiglaucoma medication used before and after surgery. Safety of the treatments was evaluated based on the number of incidences of certain intraoperative and postoperative complications. Independent prospective randomized controlled trials (PRCTs) have demonstrated that both procedures, canaloplasty and iStent implantation, are effective in reducing IOP and the amount of antiglaucoma medication. Considering the safety profile of these procedures, both canaloplasty and iStent implantation are associated with low rates of postoperative complications and have similar safety profiles. Further studies are needed to confirm the results of our analysis, including a high-quality randomized controlled trial comparing canaloplasty and iStent bypass implantation [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. The only proven factor in slowing the progression of glaucomatous neuropathy is lower intraocular pressure (IOP), which can be achieved with pharmacology, laser therapy, or surgery. However, these treatments are associated with various adverse effects, including corneal endothelial cell loss (CECL). In recent years, several novel surgeries for reducing the IOP, collectively referred to as minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), have been developed, one of which is the iStent. However, the long-term effects of such surgeries remain unknown. We compared a group of patients with open-angle glaucoma and cataract who underwent phacoemulsification alone with a group of patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics who underwent simultaneous phacoemulsification and iStent implantation. Overall, 26 eyes of 22 subjects who underwent a combined phacoemulsification-iStent procedure and 26 eyes of 24 subjects who underwent cataract surgery were included. Before surgery, endothelial cells accounted to 2228.65 ± 474.99 in iStent group and 2253.96 ± 404.76 in the control group (p = 0.836). After surgery, their number declined to 1389.77 ± 433.26 and 1475.31 ± 556.45, respectively (p = 0.509). There was no statistically significant difference in CECL between the two groups 18–24 months after surgery, despite increased manipulation in the anterior chamber and the presence of an implant in the trabecular meshwork in those with an iStent implant. Thus, iStent bypass implantation is a safe treatment in terms of CECL for mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

iStent implantation is thought to augment the trabecular outflow channel in the anterior segment of the eye. We hypothesized that iStent with subsequent selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) would better control the intraocular pressure (IOP) compared to standalone SLT in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). We, therefore, determined if the presence of an iStent combined with SLT was statistically associated with IOP lowering compared to standalone SLT. Through retrospective electronic medical record review, records of 824 eyes from 440 patients who received primary SLT without a history of iStent were considered. Additionally, 42 eyes from 28 patients who received SLT after combined phacoemulsification and iStent implantation that failed to control intraocular pressure (IOP) and/or the progression of the disease were retrospectively reviewed. IOP and number of medications, which were tracked in each patient for up to 12 months post laser, were also examined. Successful outcome was defined as a statistically significant reduction in IOP or number of medications at 6 months. As defined in univariate analysis (p ≤ 0.01), multivariate analysis included iStent, age, sex, race, and initial IOP as variables. IOP reduction was statistically associated with patients pre-SLT IOP (p < 0.001) but not with patients with iStent (p = 0.222). Medication reduction was statistically associated with the pre-SLT number of medications (p < 0.001) and iStent (p < 0.001). In eyes that received SLT, iStent was not statistically associated with a greater reduction in IOP compared to controls, but was associated with a higher reduction in the overall number of medications used 6 months after receiving SLT. The work presented should guide clinicians to consider SLT as an effective therapy after iStent implantation, in terms of glaucoma medication reduction in iStent patients, but clinicians should know that the presence of an iStent does not necessarily make subsequent SLT more effective at lowering IOP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]