Search

Leiothrix differs from other genera of Eriocaulaceae by having pistillate flowers with nectariferous and stigmatic branches that diverge at different heights on the style and staminate flowers with free or fused petals. To understand the ontogenetic processes that result in these morphological variations, we studied the development and floral vasculature in six species of the genus. In pistillate flowers, the nectariferous branches, which are in a carinal position, correspond to the apex of the carpels, whereas the stigmatic branches, in a commissural position, are formed by the marginal tissues of the carpels and initiate later than the nectariferous branches. The upper margins of the carpels elongate, forming a tubular structure that raises the stigmatic branches; the greater its development, the greater the distance between the stigmatic and nectariferous branches. In staminate flowers, the fusion of the petals appears to be post-genital in the median and apical portions and congenital in the more basal portion. Despite the differences in floral development, Leiothrix shares the same pattern of floral vasculature with other genera of Eriocaulaceae, exhibiting a central vascular plexus in the receptacle from which a single trace diverges for each sepal, petal and stamen. The staminodes are not vascularized. The dorsal carpellary bundles supply the nectariferous branches, but the ventral carpel bundles are reduced and are not involved in the supply of the ovules and stigmas. The differences in the height of insertion of the nectariferous branches are probably the result of selective pressure exerted by different groups of pollinating insects. Our hypothesis is that species in which the nectariferous branches are inserted below the stigmatic branches, and are therefore less accessible, exhibit a more specialized pollination system. The absence of nectariferous branches in L. angustifolia indicates secondary loss probably associated with spontaneous geitonogamy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We provide a detailed comparative study of floral ontogeny and vasculature in Xyridaceae, including Xyris, Abolboda and Orectanthe. We evaluate these data in the context of a recent well-resolved phylogenetic analysis of Poales to compare floral structures within the xyrid clade (Xyridaceae and Eriocaulaceae). Xyrids are relatively diverse in both flower structure and anatomy; many species incorporate diverse and unusual floral structures such as staminodes and stylar appendages. Xyridaceae possess three generally epipetalous stamens in a single whorl; the 'missing' stamen whorl is either entirely absent or transformed into staminodes. Fertile stamens each receive a single vascular bundle diverged from the median petal bundle. In Xyris, the stamen bundle diverges at the flower base, but it diverges at upper flower levels in both Abolboda and Orectanthe. In species of Abolboda that possess staminodes, staminode vasculature is closely associated with the lateral vasculature of each petal. Despite the likely sister-group relationship between Eriocaulaceae and Xyridaceae, our character optimization indicates that the stylar appendages that characterize some Xyridaceae (except Xyris and Achlyphila) are non-homologous with those of some Eriocaulaceae. On the other hand, it remains equivocal whether the loss of a fertile outer androecial whorl occurred more than once during the evolutionary history of the xyrid clade; this transition occurred either once followed by a reversal to fertile stamens in Eriocauloideae and staminodes in some Xyridaceae, or twice independently within both Xyridaceae and Eriocaulaceae. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The typical mapaniid reproductive unit, which comprises several bracts, stamens and a gynoecium, may be interpreted as a single flower. Although developmental studies suggest that the mapaniid reproductive units are inflorescences, the units in species such as Hypolytrum schraderianum Nees are much reduced and strongly resemble a single flower. Therefore, an anatomical and developmental study of the reproductive units of Mapania pycnostachya (Benth.) T.Koyama and H. schraderianum was conducted to better understand their structure. In both species, two lateral bracts (prophyll-like units) are the first to emerge, followed by staminal and gynoecial primordia. The reproductive units of M. pycnostachya have two inner bracts (leaf-like structures) that initiate after the stamens. In H. schraderianum, they are absent. In both species, the reproductive units have spiral phyllotaxy and staminal traces that join the vascular system of the reproductive-unit axis at different levels. The vasculature patternof these units differs from the cyperoid flowers. On the basis of these results, it is inferred that the reproductive units of both species are inflorescences, composed of unisexual flowers. It is also inferred that this structure is the general pattern for Mapanioideae and that loss of male flowers and inner bracts has occurred during evolution of the subfamily. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: In Cyperaceae, leaf anatomical characters, in particular the presence of a hypodermis or of a multiple epidermis, have contributed in taxonomic and phylogenetic studies. In this family, the leaf epidermis is often described as uniseriate, and the cells of the subepidermal layers having no chloroplasts are treated as hypodermis. Both tissues have a different ontogenetic origin and hence are not homologous. The aim of the present work was to verify the origin of the subepidermal layers in eight species belonging to Cyperoideae. All species studied presented multiple epidermal layers that were confirmed by leaf ontogeny. In Fimbristylis complanata, F. dichotoma, Pycreus flavescens and P. polystachyos the mature leaves present multiple epidermal layers with cells of the distinct layers similar in shape and size; in the other species studied these cells are different. Especially in the latter case, a multiple epidermis is easily interpreted erroneously as a hypodermis, possibly leading to erroneous evolutionary conclusions. Making correctly distinction between a hypodermis and a multiple epidermis, and hence in case of doubt investigating the origin of the questioned tissue, is compulsory in order to use both characters in a phylogenetic context. Though in the past often called ‘hypodermis’, our leaf ontogenetical observations show that in all species studied, the subepidermical layers constitute a multiple epidermis, originating from the protodermis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]