Search

Objective A subset analysis of the LETS study suggested that S-1 plus carboplatin was more beneficial than paclitaxel plus carboplatin in terms of the overall survival (OS) in squamous cell lung cancer. However, the benefit of maintenance therapy for squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is still unknown. We herein report a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a tailored dose of S-1 plus carboplatin followed by maintenance S-1 in chemotherapy-naive advanced squamous cell NSCLC. Methods Patients received carboplatin on day 1 plus S-1 on days 1 to 14 every 21 days. The dose of S-1 was determined by the body surface area and creatinine clearance. After four cycles of induction, non-progressive patients continued to receive S-1 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was an objective response rate (RR) with a threshold value of 15%. The secondary endpoints were the progression-free survival (PFS) and OS from enrollment, the PFS in the maintenance phase, and safety. Results In the 33 patients analyzed, the rate of patients who met the primary endpoint was 30.3% (95% confidence interval: 15.6-48.7%), and the disease control rate was 75.8%. The median PFS and OS were 3.5 and 11.3 months, respectively. Ten patients received maintenance S-1, and the median PFS from the beginning of induction treatment was 5.3 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities with a frequency of more than 5% were all controllable. Conclusion Tailored-dose S-1 plus carboplatin followed by maintenance S-1 is an effective and feasible treatment for advanced squamous cell NSCLC.

A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent nab-paclitaxel in 67 patients with platinum-resistant non-small cell lung cancer in Kansai Medical University Hospital from August 2013 to December 2015. Overall, 25% of patients experienced disease progression, 48% exhibited a partial response, 27% had stable disease and 0% had a complete response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 4.8 months and the median overall survival time was 18.2 months. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between patients with non-squamous carcinoma and squamous carcinoma, or between second-line use and post-second-line use. The most common severe adverse event was neutropenia, followed by interstitial lung disease, infection and fatigue. The results revealed that single agent nab-paclitaxel was associated with an acceptable level of toxicity and a favorable response. This regimen has been developed recently, thus it has not been sufficiently evaluated its toxicity and efficacy. Additional studies to evaluate these parameters in non-small cell lung cancer are warranted.

BACKGROUND Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors significantly prolong the progression-free survival of patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, most patients develop tumor regrowth and their prognosis remains poor. A new treatment strategy for NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation is therefore necessary. METHODS In phase I, eligible patients were administered oral erlotinib daily and intravenous pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab every 3 weeks for four cycles with maintenance of pemetrexed and bevacizumab until progressive disease was observed. The dose of erlotinib was 100 mg for dose level 1 and 150 mg for dose level 2. The doses of pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab were fixed at 500 mg/m2, area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg/mL · min, and 15 mg/kg, respectively. The dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3/4 neutropenia with fever or infection, grade 4 leukopenia lasting for ≥7 days, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3/4 uncontrollable nonhematological toxicity, and delayed administration of the subsequent cycle by >2 weeks because of adverse events. RESULTS Six patients were enrolled in phase I (dose level 1, n = 3; dose level 2, n = 3). During the induction phase, grade 3 neutropenia without fever was observed in one patient at dose level 1 and two patients at dose level 2. Grade 3 anemia was reported in one patient at dose level 1 and grade 3 thrombocytopenia was reported in two patients at dose level 1 and dose level 2, respectively. CONCLUSION Four-drug combination therapy is a feasible and promising.

Bevacizumab(Avastin®), a humanized therapeutic monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor, is widely used in cancer treatment. Patients who are treated with bevacizumab have an increased risk of developing systemic hypertension. However, the relationship between bevacizumab‐induced hypertension and clinical outcome remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of bevacizumab‐induced hypertension in terms of prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer and non‐small cell lung cancer. The study included 632 patients, 317 patients with non‐small cell lung cancer and 315 patients with colorectal cancer. All patients were treated with bevacizumab in combination with standard chemotherapy protocols, between April 2007 and December 2014. Blood pressure was measured before each treatment cycle. In the patient group with colorectal cancer, treated with bevacizumab, Grade 2–3 hypertension was present in 27.6%. In hypertensive patients with colorectal cancer, median overall survival was 42.6 months, compared with 20.6 months for normotensive patients in this group (P = 0.00071). In the patient group with non‐small cell lung cancer, treated with bevacizumab, Grade 2–3 hypertension was present in 20.5%. In hypertensive patients with non‐small cell lung cancer, median overall survival was 43.0 months, compared with 26.3 months for normotensive patients in this group (P = 0.00451). Patients who developed hypertension during treatment with bevacizumab for colorectal cancer and non‐small cell lung cancer had significantly prolonged overall survival when compared with normotensive patients. Bevacizumab‐induced hypertension may represent a biomarker for clinical benefit in cancer patients treated with bevacizumab.

Background: Bevacizumab-based chemotherapy has been shown to extend progression-free survival (PFS) of lung cancer, but its effect on overall survival (OS) remains unclear. However, bevacizumab beyond disease progression (BBP) significantly improved OS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Therefore, we retrospectively analysed 22 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with docetaxel plus BBP at the Department of Thoracic Oncology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, between November 2009 and March 2013. Results: The response rate was 31.8% and the disease control rate was 86.4%. The median PFS was 4.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 - 8.7 months) and the median OS was 17.2 months (95% CI, 8.5 - 25.9 months). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events included leukocytopenia (68.2%), neutropenia (77.3%), fatigue (9.1%), proteinuria (9.1%), febrile neutropenia (4.5%), anemia (4.5%), and anorexia (4.5%). Conclusion: Docetaxel plus BBP was found to be generally well tolerated and effective.

The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed, carboplatin and bevacizumab, followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab, in chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The patients were administered pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 ), carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve, 6.0 mg/ml x min) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) intravenously every three weeks for up to six cycles. Patients who did not experience tumor progression remained on maintenance pemetrexed and beva- cizumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. Of the 26 patients enrolled between March 2010 and April 2011, three were excluded due to brain metastases, therefore the intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 23 patients. The median age was 64 years (range, 40-74 years) and 15 patients were male. In total, six patients had a perfor- mance status of 0, and 20 had stage IV tumors. The response rate was 69.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 47.1-86.8), the disease control rate was 100% and the time to response was 1.2 months (95% CI, 0.72-1.93). The median progression-free survival time was 8.6 months (95% CI, 5.9-10.9) and the median overall survival time was 18.6 months (95% CI, 12.9- 24.8). There were no grade 3 or worse hemorrhagic events and the feasibility was modest. Overall, pemetrexed and carboplatin plus bevacizumab, followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab, was effective and tolerable in the patients with non-squamous NSCLC, and the time to response was relatively short.

e20042Background: Concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy with thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) is well established with standard therapy in locally advanced NSCLC pts. Nanoparticle albumin-bound pa...

e19132 Background: Randomized studies showed that the addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy regimens significantly improved outcome in previously untreated patients with advanced non-squ...

e18081 Background: Until recently non–small-cell lung cancer was treated as a single disease with “platinum-based doublet chemotherapy” comprising first-line treatment for advanced disease. However, survival outcome of advanced non-squamous non–small-cell lung cancer are improving since the appearance of pemetrexed and bevacizumab. These drugs show a high effect especially to Adenocarcinoma, but there are few reports of the regimen which combined these both agents. Then, we designed this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab in patients with chemotherapy-naïve Japanese stage IIIB or stage IV non-squamous non–small-cell lung cancer. Methods: Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. For patients who is not progressed after pemetrexed, carboplatin and bevacizumab therapy, pemetrexed and bevacizumab were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primarity endpoint is response rate. Results: 23 patients were enrolled between March 2010 and April 2011 and treated. Median age was 64 (40-74), 15 patients were male, 6 patients were PS 0, 20 patients were Stage IV. Response rate was 69.5% and disease control rate was 100%. Median PFS was 8.5 months and median OS was not reached. Median time to response was 1.2 months. There were no grade 3 or worse hemorrhagic events. The feasibility was modest. Conclusions: Pemetrexed and carboplatin plus bevacizumab with maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab was efficacy and tolerable regimen in Japanese patients with non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. This regimen also has a trend of shorter period for response. It may contribute to the better QoL.

Background Combined small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is defined as SCLC combined with elements of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), accounting for approximately 30% of cases of SCLC. However, combined SCLC and giant cell carcinoma (GC) is very rare. Case presentation A 50-year-old woman with a 45 pack-year smoking history was referred to our hospital for further investigation of an abnormal left hilar shadow. Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed a 28-mm solid pulmonary nodule in the left lower lobe and an enlarged left hilar lymph node adjacent to the left main pulmonary artery. CT-guided biopsy of the pulmonary nodule led to the diagnosis of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. The preoperative clinical stage was defined as cT1bN1M0. Thus, the patient underwent left lower lobectomy with ND2a-2 lymph node dissection via thoracotomy. Pathological investigation revealed a 22-mm tumor and dense sheet-like growth of small tumor cells with scant cytoplasm and finely granular nuclear chromatin. Moreover, there was a sheet-like growth of bizarre, highly pleomorphic mono- or occasionally multinucleated giant cells, accounting for approximately 40% of the tumor. Both the small and giant cell components were thyroid transcription factor-1-positive and p40-negative and exhibited neuroendocrine differentiation, as indicated by positivity for synaptophysin and CD56 and negativity for chromogranin A. While the small cell component was E-cadherin-positive and vimentin-negative, the giant cell component was E-cadherin-negative and vimentin-positive, indicating an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Only the small cell component was found within the mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. The final pathological diagnosis was combined SCLC and GC, pT1bN2M0, and pStage IIIA. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with 4 cycles of cisplatin and irinotecan. No sign of recurrence has been noted for 1 year after the surgery. Conclusions This is the first detailed report of a unique case with combined SCLC and GC. The coexistence of SCLC and GC in the presented case might indicate several possibilities: (1) GC may arise from SCLC via epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, (2) SCLC may arise from GC through phenotypic conversion, and (3) SCLC and GC may have derived from a common neuroendocrine origin. Further investigation is necessary to reveal the underlying pathological process.