Search

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is highly heterogeneous cancer and the most challenging subtype of breast cancer. And its prognosis is poor compared to the other subtypes. Unlike luminal type cancers, there is no valid biomarker to predict the prognosis of patients with early TNBC. To establish an elaborate therapeutic strategy for TNBC, biomarkers that accurately predict the prognosis and response to treatment are needed. Method: 184 patients with early stage TNBC (training cohort, n = 76; validation cohort, n = 108) were enrolled. Median Follow-up period was 51.5 months (range: 4.6-230.8) for training cohort and 58.3 months (range: 6.6-99.8) for validation cohort. Of the patients in training cohort, 13 patients had recurrence or metastasis. Of the patients in validation cohort, 23 patients had recurrence or metastasis. Using a HiSeq sequencer, RNA sequencing was conducted to analyze the gene expression profiles of tumor samples from TNBC patients. Gene signature was analyzed by combination of DEGs which found in gene expression profiles. Cross validation and meta-analysis were conducted as pre-validation. Meta-analysis was conducted using CBS probePINGS. To compare gene signature and other methods, PAM 50 call and TCR diversity analysis were investigated. Statistical analyses were conducted using R language (v.3.4.3). Result: To predict prognosis of recurrence or metastasis for TNBC patients, we identified the 10-gene signature (DGKH, GADD45B, KLF7, LYST, NR6A1, PYCARD, ROBO1, SLC22A20P, SLC24A3 and SLC45A4) that stratified patients with TNBC by risk score (sensitivity = 92.31%; specificity = 92.06%; accuracy = 92.11%) and validated in a cohort of separate institutions. Meta-analysis supported the biological relevance of the 10-gene signature to well-known driving pathways in TNBC. When compared with other potential biomarkers like PAM 50 call and T-cell receptor β diversity, the 10-gene signature was the only independent factor that can predict prognosis for invasive disease-free survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Our novel findings can contribute to solving the diagnostic challenges in TNBC and the 10-gene signature may serve as a novel biomarker for risk-based patient care. Citation Format: Chang Min Kim, Kyong Hwa Park, Yun Suk Yu, Ju Won Kim, Jin Young Park, Jeong Eon Lee, Sung Hoon Sim, Bo Kyoung Seo, Jin Kyeoung Kim, Eun Sook Lee, Yeon Hee Park, Sun-Young Kong. A 10-gene signature to predict the prognosis of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-25.

ESR1 mutation ( ESR1m) is a frequent cause of acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), which is a first-line therapy for hormone-receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Camizestrant is a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that in a phase II study significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) over fulvestrant (also a SERD) in ER+/HER2- ABC. SERENA-6 (NCT04964934) is a randomized, double-blind, phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of switching from an AI to camizestrant, while maintaining the same CDK4/6i, upon detection of ESR1m in circulating tumor DNA before clinical disease progression on first-line therapy for HR+/HER2- ABC. The aim is to treat ESR1m clones and extend the duration of control of ER-driven tumor growth, delaying the need for chemotherapy. The primary end point is PFS; secondary end points include chemotherapy-free survival, time to second progression event (PFS2), overall survival, patient-reported outcomes and safety.

Introduction Recent advances in breast cancer treatment strategies have improved survival outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Targeting immune checkpoint, especially programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), has made a breakthrough in treating advanced malignancies including breast cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, in combination with chemotherapy have prolonged survival outcomes in mBC with triple negative subtype. However, the low response rate and resistance of ICIs with anti-PD 1/PDL-1 antibodies is a major limitation and a challenge. Lymphocyte Activation Gene-3 (LAG3; CD223) is a potential cancer immunotherapeutic target due to its negative regulatory role on T cells and cytokines, thereby ensuring immune homeostasis. Several studies suggested that combination immunotherapy of anti-LAG-3 and anti-PD-1 has shown promising efficacy in fighting PD-1 resistance. Therefore, we evaluated the prognostic role of LAG3 in metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) treated with ICIs to figure out resistance mechanism of ICIs. Methods mTNBC patients with available archival tumor tissues, who has received ICIs in Samsung Medical Center, were enrolled in this study. For the evaluation of LAG3 expression in tumor microenvironment, Vectra Polaris Multispectral Imaging and Whole Slide Scanning technique (PerkinElmer, Inc. Hopkinton, MA) was used. Results In total, 64 mTNBC patients were treated with ICI’s with or without cytotoxic chemotherapy between 2019.02- 2021.11. Of 70 mTNBC patients, 41 patients had archival tissues and finally 40 patients were included in this study. Median age was 43.0 years of age (range: 24.5 ~ 64.5). Recurrent mTNBC was 92.5% and only 7.5% was de novo mTNBC. Geremline BRCA1 pathogenic variants were detected in 4 (10.0%) patients. Among 37 recurrent mTNBC patients, 72.5% were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with anthracycline (97.3%) and taxane(97.3%). Among ICI’s, 52.5% were treated with pembrolizumab and 47.5% of atezolizumab. LAG3 expression varies among mTNBC tissues (median cell density: 366, range: 48, 2861 cells/mm2). Among cells expressing LAG3, LAG3 was expressed more in CK+ cells compared with CK- cells (median:150 (20, 2503) cells/mm2 in CK+ cells, median: 88 (2, 806) cells/mm2 in CK- cells, p=0.005). Patients with high LAG3 expression in CK+ cells showed short progression free survival(PFS) compared to those with low LAG3 expression in CK+ cells (median PFS of high vs. low LAG3 expression [months]:1.9 vs. 4.2, p=0.01). On the contrary, patients with high LAG3 expression in CK- cells had 9.1 months of PFS compared to 3.1 months of PFS in patients with low LAG3 expression in CK- cells (p=0.10). In addition, patients with high LAG3 in CK- cells had longer overall survival(OS) compared to those with low LAG3 expression in CK- cells (median OS of high vs. low LAG3 expression [months]: not reached, 15.7, p=0.05). Conclusion LAG3 expression was associated with PFS in patients with mTNBC treated with ICI’s independent of PDL-1 expression. And the prognostic significance of LAG3 expression was different between CK+ cells and CK- cells. These findings need to be proved in large scale clinical trials. Citation Format: ji-Yeon Kim, Jeehyun Kim, Hae Hyun Jung, eun Yoon Cho, Yeon Hee Park, Jin Seok Ahn, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Young-Hyuck Im. Prognostic impact of lymphocyte-Activation Gene-3 (LAG-3) expression in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-20-10.

Background The hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients show a diverse range of tumor mutational burden (TMB), but its biological and clinical implication has been largely unrevealed. Here we report genomic landscape of 117 HR+ MBC patients who were included in the pre-screening tissue genomic analysis of MUTATION-1 study (SABCS 2021; Abs P1-19-03) according to TMB of tumors. Patients and method The MUTATION-1 study (NCT03608865) enrolled HR-positive MBC patients who received prior ≥ 1 line of systemic therapy, and performed prescreening with whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-seq of fresh-frozen tissue of metastatic or recurred tumors. Patients who met upper 30% of TMB were eligible for treatment phase and received durvalumab plus tremelimumab. This study analyzed 117 prescreening tissues of MUTATION-1 study patients for mutation and transcriptomic landscape analysis. (WES, n=117; RNA-seq, n=107) Results The 117 patients showed diverse TMB (range 0~21.7 mut/Mb, median 2.0 mut/Mb) and genomic alterations. The most frequently mutated gene included PIK3CA (29.1%), TP53 (27.4%), ESR1 (23.9%), GATA3 (19.7%), and MAP3K1 (12.0%). There was no association between patient survival and TMB. We estimated single base substitution (SBS) mutational signature of patients with SigMA algorithm. The patients were classified according to their dominant mutational signatures: APOBEC (25.6%), HRD (41.0%), clockwise (28.2%), SBS8, and SBS17. The APOBEC patients showed higher TMB (median 3.47 mut/Mb) and higher mutation prevalence in PIK3CA (63.3% vs. 29.1%), ARID1A (16.7% vs. 6.0%), and NF1 (16.7% vs. 6.8%) compared with other patients. The high TMB positively correlated with time from MBC diagnosis to biopsy. Tumors with TMB ≥ 5 mut/Mb were exclusively found in patients diagnosed as MBC ≥ 36 months before the timing of biopsy. In the matched RNA-seq analysis, TMB was higher in luminal B and HER2-enriched intrinsic subtype patients than basal or luminal A subtype. The high TMB (≥ 3.16 mut/Mb, cutoff used for treatment phase patient selection) patients showed upregulation of G2/M checkpoint, MYC, E2F1, and MTORC1 signature compared to low TMB patients. In the tumor microenvironment analysis by CIBESORT, PIK3CA mutant patients showed lower score of cytotoxic T cell than others. Conclusions The high TMB in HR+ breast cancer was associated with longer time duration from MBC diagnosis to biopsy, high APOBEC signature, and cell cycle/MYC signature gene upregulation. Further therapeutic targeting of high TMB patients is warranted based on their genomic and immunologic characteristics. Citation Format: Min Hwan Kim, Yohan Yang, Eunyoung Kim, Yong Wha Moon, Gun Min Kim, Seul-Gi Kim, Yee Soo Chae, Jieun Lee, Jae Ho Jeong, Kyung-Hun Lee, Han Jo Kim, Joo Young Jung, Su-Jin Koh, Kyoung Eun Lee, Hee-Jun Kim, Kyong Hwa Park, Seungtaek Lim, Yeon Hee Park, Sangwoo Kim, Joo Hyuk Sohn. Genomic characterization of hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer with high tumor mutational burden: fresh-frozen tissue genomic analysis from MUTATION-1 study (KCSG BR17-04) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-04.

Adjuvant therapy; Breast cancer; Olaparib Terapia adyuvante; Cáncer de mama; Olaparib Teràpia adjuvant; Càncer de mama; Olaparib Background The randomized, double-blind OlympiA trial compared 1 year of the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, olaparib, to matching placebo as adjuvant therapy for patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2pv) and high-risk, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, early breast cancer (EBC). The first pre-specified interim analysis (IA) previously demonstrated statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). The olaparib group had fewer deaths than the placebo group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance for overall survival (OS). We now report the pre-specified second IA of OS with updates of IDFS, DDFS, and safety. Patients and methods One thousand eight hundred and thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to olaparib or placebo following (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy if indicated. Endocrine therapy was given concurrently with study medication for hormone receptor-positive cancers. Statistical significance for OS at this IA required P < 0.015. Results With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the second IA of OS demonstrated significant improvement in the olaparib group relative to the placebo group [hazard ratio 0.68; 98.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97; P = 0.009]. Four-year OS was 89.8% in the olaparib group and 86.4% in the placebo group (Δ 3.4%, 95% CI −0.1% to 6.8%). Four-year IDFS for the olaparib group versus placebo group was 82.7% versus 75.4% (Δ 7.3%, 95% CI 3.0% to 11.5%) and 4-year DDFS was 86.5% versus 79.1% (Δ 7.4%, 95% CI 3.6% to 11.3%), respectively. Subset analyses for OS, IDFS, and DDFS demonstrated benefit across major subgroups. No new safety signals were identified including no new cases of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Conclusion With 3.5 years of median follow-up, OlympiA demonstrates statistically significant improvement in OS with adjuvant olaparib compared with placebo for gBRCA1/2pv-associated EBC and maintained improvements in the previously reported, statistically significant endpoints of IDFS and DDFS with no new safety signals. Funding for this work, which was conducted as a collaborative partnership among the Breast International Group, NRG Oncology, Frontier Science, AstraZeneca, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, U.S.A. (MSD), was provided by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers: U10CA 180868, UG1CA 189867, and U10CA 180822) and by AstraZeneca as part of an alliance between AstraZeneca and MSD. Provision of olaparib and placebo was from AstraZeneca.

Background: Mucinous carcinoma is the third most common histological subtype of breast cancer after ductal and lobular carcinomas, accounting for approximately 3% of invasive breast cancers. Although considered a favourable subtype with de-escalation of treatment recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, recurrence can occur and supporting data is limited. We thus examined prognostic factors of pure mucinous breast cancer (PMBC) in an international multicentre cohort study. Methods: Patients diagnosed between January 2000 to December 2015 with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative stage I to III PMBC, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) at 6 centers in Singapore, Taiwan, Korea and Japan were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to compare relapse-free survival (RFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) by histological subtypes, and to identify prognostic factors for PMBC. Results: Of 23,105 women eligible for analysis, 20,684 had IDC, 1,475 had ILC and 946 had PMBC. The median follow-up was 6.6 years; 5-year RFS, DRFS and OS for PMBC were 94.6%, 96.5% and 98.1% respectively. On multivariable cox regression analyses, PMBC demonstrated superior RFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56 - 0.88), DRFS (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.53 - 0.89) and OS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.52 - 0.93) compared to IDC, while ILC had comparable survival outcomes as IDC. When restricted to only PMBC, significant independent prognostic factors for RFS included ethnicity (vs Chinese, “Others” [non-Chinese/Japanese/Korean, mainly Malay and Indian]: HR = 2.62, 95% CI 1.23 – 5.57), older age (vs < 40 years, >70 years: HR = 3.53, 95% CI 1.67 – 7.46), tumor size (vs T1, T3-4: HR = 2.79, 95% CI 1.45 – 5.37), positive lymph nodes (HR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.10 – 3.77), use of radiotherapy (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 – 0.91) and endocrine therapy (HR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.12 – 0.77). On further analysis, the inferior RFS, DRFS and OS in older patients (>70 years) were driven largely by non-breast cancer deaths rather than relapses. Use of endocrine therapy was also associated with superior DRFS (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.09 – 0.73) but not OS. In a subgroup analysis, use of chemotherapy was associated with improved DRFS (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 – 0.82) and OS (HR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 – 0.37) with a trend in RFS (HR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.14 – 1.24) for lymph node-positive PMBC; no differences in outcomes were observed for the lymph node-negative subgroup. Conclusions: Larger tumor size, lymph node positivity and ethnicity were significant factors for RFS in PMBC. Use of endocrine therapy was associated with superior RFS and DRFS, while chemotherapy was associated with better DRFS and OS for lymph-node positive PMBC. Citation Format: Ryan Tan, Whee Sze Ong, Kyung-Hun Lee, Seri Park, Jabed Iqbal, Yeon Hee Park, Jeong-Eon Lee, Jong Han Yu, Ching-Hung Lin, Yen-Shen Lu, Makiko Ono, Takayuki Ueno, Yoichi Naito, Tatsuya Onishi, Geok hoon Lim, Su-Ming Tan, Han-Byoel Lee, Jiwon Koh, Han Suk Ryu, Wonshik Han, Veronique Kiak Mien Tan, Fuh-Yong Wong, Seock-Ah Im, Puay Hoon Tan, Yoon-Sim Yap. Prognostic factors in non-metastatic hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative mucinous breast cancer: an international multicentre cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-36.

Background: Chemotherapy is the main treatment in patients with pre-treated endocrine-resistant HR+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer, but has limited efficacy and substantial toxicities. The antibody-drug conjugate Dato-DXd consists of a humanized IgG1 mAb targeting TROP2 attached via a stable cleavable linker to a topoisomerase I (TopI) inhibitor payload. Heavily pre-treated patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in the TROPION-PanTumor01 (NCT03401385) study of Dato-DXd showed a manageable safety profile and highly encouraging objective response rates (ORR by blinded independent central review [BICR]: 34% in all patients; 52% in patients treatment-naïve to TopI inhibitor-based therapies). The metastatic HR+/HER2– breast cancer cohort of TROPION-PanTumor01 has completed enrollment (n=41); data are currently maturing. Trial design: TROPION-Breast01 (NCT05104866) is an ongoing, global, phase 3, open-label, randomized trial evaluating efficacy and safety of Dato-DXd vs investigators’ choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in patients with inoperable or metastatic HR+/HER2– breast cancer. Patients (n≈700) are randomized 1:1 to Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg IV Q3W or ICC (eribulin, capecitabine, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until progression. Adults with an ECOG performance status of 0–1, who experienced progression on or are unsuitable for endocrine therapy, and received 1–2 prior lines of standard-of-care chemotherapy in the inoperable or metastatic setting are eligible. Monotherapy treatment with inhibitors of mTOR, PD-[L]1, CDK4/6 and PARP do not count as prior chemotherapy lines. Patients must have ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1 and an archival or fresh formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor sample. Clinically inactive brain metastases are permitted. Dual primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) by BICR, and overall survival. Secondary endpoints include PFS per investigator, ORR, disease control rate, patient-reported outcomes, and Dato-DXd pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. Exploratory endpoints include TROP2 expression and exposure–efficacy relationship. Patients are stratified by number of prior chemotherapy lines, prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use, and region. At the time of writing 236 patients have been enrolled across 19 countries. Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, Kevin Kalinsky, Junji Tsurutani, Erika Hamilton, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Kyong Hwa Park, Yeon Hee Park, Seock-Ah Im, Keun Seok Lee, Daisy Dastur, Vincent Haddad, Sabrina Khan, Binghe Xu, Barbara Pistilli, Hope Rugo. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd), a TROP2 antibody-drug conjugate, vs investigators’ choice of chemotherapy in previously-treated, inoperable or metastatic HR+/HER2– breast cancer: TROPION-Breast01 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-03-04.

Purpose Docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (TCHP) regimen is frequently used to treat early and locally advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer (BC) in neoadjuvant setting. However, large-scaled real-world evidence did not exist.Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with early or locally advanced HER2-positive BC who underwent neoadjuvant TCHP followed by curative surgery at Samsung Medical Center between January 2016 and August 2020.Results Of 447 patients, 316 (70.7%) received breast-conserving surgery and 131 (29.3%) received total mastectomy. In terms of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response, pathologic complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB) score were analyzed. The rate of pCR was 64% a class of RCB 0 was observed in 65% of cases, RCB class I in 12%, RCB class II in 14%, and RCB class III in 2%. The 3-year event-free survival rate was 90.6%, BC with pCR occurred in 92.8%, and BC with non-pCR in 86.3% (p=0.016). In terms of distant metastasis, the 3-year distant recurrence-free survival rate was 93.5%; BC with pCR occurred in 95.9% and BC with non-pCR in 89.2% (p=0.013). Mucositis (85.2%), pain (83.2%), and diarrhea (70.5%) were the most common non-hematologic adverse events. In terms of hematologic adverse events, anemia (89.9%) was the most commonly observed adverse events followed by thrombocytopenia (29.8%).Conclusion Neoadjuvant TCHP therapy had a pCR rate of 64% and a 3-year event-free survival of 90% in real world experience. In terms of toxicity profile, anemia was frequently observed and adequate management including occasional transfusion was required.

Purpose We aimed to investigate manifestations and patterns of care for patients with brain metastasis (BM) from breast cancer (BC) and compared their overall survival (OS) from 2005 through 2014 in Korea.Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 600 BC patients with BM diagnosed between 2005 and 2014. The median follow-up duration was 12.5 months. We categorized the patients into three groups according to the year when BM was initially diagnosed (group I [2005-2008], 98 patients; group II [2009-2011], 200 patients; and group III [2012-2014], 302 patients).Results Over time, the median age at BM diagnosis increased by 2.2 years (group I, 49.0 years; group II, 48.3 years; and group III, 51.2 years; p=0.008). The percentage of patients with extracranial metastasis was 73.5%, 83.5%, and 86.4% for group I, II, and III, respectively (p=0.011). The time interval between BC and BM was prolonged in patients with stage III primary BC (median, 2.4 to 3 years; p=0.029). As an initial brain-directed treatment, whole-brain radiotherapy alone decreased from 80.0% in 2005 to 41.1% in 2014. Meanwhile, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy alone increased from 13.3% to 34.7% during the same period (p=0.005). The median OS for group I, II, and III was 15.6, 17.9, and 15.0 months, respectively, with no statistical significance.Conclusion The manifestations of BM from BC and the pattern of care have changed from 2005 to 2014 in Korea. However, the OS has remained relatively unchanged over the 10 years.

Purpose Trastuzumab has markedly improved the survival outcomes of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer, and dual blockade of HER2 using trastuzumab and pertuzumab in combination with taxanes (THP) has become a standard of care for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) worldwide since the CLEOPATRA trial. We assessed the outcomes of THP as a first-line treatment for Korean HER2-positive MBC patients in the real-world setting.Materials and Methods Between August 2008 and October 2020, we identified 228 HER2-positive MBC patients who received THP as a first-line palliative chemotherapy. We analyzed survival outcomes, efficacy, and adverse events of THP retrospectively.Results After a median follow-up duration of 28.7 months, median overall survival and progression-free survival were 58.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.6 to 80.0) and 19.1 months (95% CI, 16.2 to 21.9), respectively. Better survival outcomes were observed in patient who received docetaxel for more than six cycles. Patients exposed to anti-HER2 directed therapies in a perioperative setting had poor survival outcomes. The overall response rate was 86.8% with a complete response (CR) rate of 17.7%. Among responders, 16.7% of patients sustained THP over 35 months and showed better survivals and higher CR rates. Adverse events were comparable to those reported in previous studies.Conclusion In a real-world context, clinical outcomes of Korean HER2-positive MBC patients treated with THP were similar to those of patients in the CLEOPATRA trial. Much longer follow-up results would be warranted.

With increasing incidence of breast cancer and improvement in treatment, the concern about surveillance management also has increased. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic value of routine surveillance FDG PET/CT in patients with breast cancer. The diagnostic performance of surveillance PET/CT was analyzed regarding sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy. The diagnostic accuracy was defined as the ability to differentiate recurrence and no-disease correctly and the proportion of true results, either true positive or true negative, in the population. Findings from pathologic examination; other imaging modalities such as CT, MRI and bone scan; or clinical follow-up were used as the reference standard. In this study of 1681 consecutive patients with breast cancer who underwent curative surgery, surveillance fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT showed good diagnostic performance in the detection of clinically unexpected recurrent breast cancer or other malignancy, with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 98.5%, positive predictive value of 70.5%, negative predictive value of 100% and accuracy of 98.5%. In conclusion, surveillance fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT showed good diagnostic performance in the detection of clinically unexpected recurrent breast cancer after curative surgery.

Background: Chemotherapy, together with immune checkpoint inhibitors, improves outcomes vs chemotherapy alone for patients (pts) with metastatic (m)TNBC PD-L1+ disease. Most of these pts progress within a year. In a previous study, D (anti-PD-L1) combined with chemotherapy enhanced antitumor immune responses in early TNBC (Loibl. Ann Oncol 2019). In TNBC, activation of the PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway and high CD73 expression are common. BEGONIA is an ongoing 2-part, multicenter, multi-arm, open-label platform study, evaluating safety and efficacy of D or D+P combined with novel therapies as first-line treatment for mTNBC (NCT03742102). Preliminary results from 2 arms were presented at ASCO 2021 (Abstract #1023). Here, we report results from Arm 1 D+P, Arm 2 D+P+C, and Arm 5 D+P+O. C is an oral, selective, ATP-competitive catalytic inhibitor of all 3 AKT isoforms, and O is a mAb targeting CD73. Methods: Eligible pts had untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic TNBC. In Arms 1 and 5, pts received D 1500 mg IV Q4W + P 90 mg/m2 IV day (d)1, d8, d15 of every cycle. Pts in Arm 5 also received O 3000 mg IV on d1 and d15 for the first 2 cycles, then Q4W. In Arm 2, pts received D 1500 mg IV Q4W + P 80/90 mg/m2 IV in 4-week cycles (d1, d8, d15, 1 week off) + C 400 mg BID in 4-week cycles (d2-5 × 3 weeks, 1 week off). Primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response. Tumors were assessed Q8W per RECIST v1.1. The first 6 pts treated in Arms 2 and 5 were evaluated for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), with additional pts enrolled if treatment was tolerated. PD-L1 expression was assessed retrospectively. Previously presented data from Arm 1 D+P, are included for reference (Schmid. ASCO 2021, #1023). Results: In Arm 2 (data cutoff Mar 2021), 30 pts received D+P+C (15 P[80], 15 P[90]; total 13 ongoing); 2 pts (6.7%) discontinued all treatment due to AEs. The rates of dose delays were 13 pts (43%) for D and 15 (50%) for P; dose interruptions were 1 (3%) for D, 12 (40%) for P, 15 (50%) for C; dose reductions were 12 (40%) for P and 14 (47%) for C. Treatment-related (tr)SAEs and G3/4 trAEs were experienced by 7 (23%) and 22 (73%) pts. In Arm 5 (data cutoff Sep 2020), 33 pts received D+P+O (14 ongoing); no pts discontinued due to AEs. The rates of dose delays were 13 pts (39%) for D, 10 (30%) for P, 10 (30%) for O; dose interruptions were 2 (6%) for D, 10 (30%) for P, 3 (9%) for O; and dose reductions were 12 (36%) for P. trSAEs and G3/4 trAEs were experienced by 1 (3%) and 5 (15%) pts. In both arms, there were no DLTs or deaths due to AEs. The Table presents follow-up time and efficacy outcomes for Arms 1, 2, and 5. Responses were observed regardless of PD-L1 expression. The potential value of mutations in the PI3K pathway and CD73 expression as predictive biomarkers will be discussed for Arms 2 and 5, respectively. Updated data for Arm 1 will be presented. Conclusions: The safety profiles of triplet combinations in Arms 2 and 5 were consistent with the individual agents; however, in Arm 2, there was a relatively high rate of G3/4 trAEs but a low discontinuation rate for AEs. Although BEGONIA was not designed to compare activity across arms and numbers were small, the ORR of each triplet therapy was numerically similar to D+P. Biomarker analysis may elucidate pts that benefit from the combination of C or O with D+P. Funding: AstraZeneca Table. Efficacy outcomes in Arms 1, 2, and 5 of BEGONIAArm 1Arm 2Arm 5D+P N=23D+P(80)+C n=15D+P(90)+C n=15All D+P+C N=30D+P+O N=33Duration of follow-up at data cutoff, months, median (range)16.6 (8.5-19.8)6.7 (2-9)16.8 (6-21)8.2 (2-21)8.6 (4.1-14.6)Confirmed ORR, n (%)13 (56.5)8 (53.3)8 (53.3)16 (53.3)15 (45.5)95% CI34.5-76.826.6-78.726.6-78.7NC28.1-63.3CR, n10111PR12871514SD (Unconfirmed PR)7 (3)6 (2)4 (2)10 (4)13 (4)PD31345Percentage with ongoing response at data cutoff53.8%75.0%25.0%50.0%66.7%Arm 1 data cutoff was Sep 2020. C, capivasertib; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; D, durvalumab; NC, not calculable; O, oleclumab; ORR, objective response rate; P, paclitaxel; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease. Citation Format: Peter Schmid, Zbigniew Nowecki, Seock-Ah Im, Wei-Pang Chung, Simon Lord, Anne Armstrong, Cynthia X Ma, Robert Huisden, Ross Stewart, Rakesh Kumar, Gaia Schiavon, Hannah Dry, Ana Nunes, Kyung Hae Jung, Yeon Hee Park. BEGONIA: Phase 1b/2 study of durvalumab (D) combinations in locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Results from Arm 1 D + paclitaxel (P), Arm 2 D+P + capivasertib (C), and Arm 5 D+P + oleclumab (O) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-03.

Background: The advance of next generation sequencing (NGS) leads to give the abundant genetic information of breast cancer (BC). We developed the prediction model of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response and long term survival using genetic characteristics in cooperation with clinicpathologic features. Methods: Early and locally advanced BCs which would be planned to receive standard NAC (four cycles of anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide and four cycles of docetaxel or docetaxel plus trastuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2[HER2+] disease) followed by curative surgery. We prospectively collected tumor tissue and matched blood three times for each patients: at BC diagnosis (T1), three weeks after the first cycle of NAC (T2), and curative surgery (T3). Whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNASeq were performed to detect somatic mutation, mutational signature, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and PAM50 prediction was to classify intrinsic subtype. In terms of clinical variables, clinical stage and IHC subtype at diagnosis, pathologic complete response (pCR), residual cancer burden (RCB) class and distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) were used for prediction model development. Logistic regression was used for predicting RCB class and pCR with clinical and genomic variables at T1. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were performed to identify prognostic factors for DRFS. Results: In total, 210 patients who were treated with scheduled NAC were enrolled. Finally, WES in 252 BC tissues (T1:123, T2:106 and T3:23) RNASeq in 198 BC tissues (T1:100, T2:77 and T3:21) were conducted from 123 patients. In NAC response, 52 patients achieved pCR(42.3%) and 14 patients were in RCB class 3, 39 in class 2, 14 in class 1 and 51 in class 0. Median follow up duration was 44months and distant recurrence was observed in 13 patients. TP53 mutation (60%) was the most commonly detected genetic alteration followed by TTN(31%), ERBB2(25%) and PIK3CA(18%). Eight BCL11A (3%) and 3 MPL mutations (1%) were also observed respectively. Serial tumor sequencing suggested that mutation profile have not changed during NAC. In terms of mutational signature, signature 3 was most frequently observed and no difference was observed in serial sequencing data. In addition, APOBEC (sig.2) and HRD (sig.3) were observed differently according to intrinsic subtype. In terms of intrinsic subtype, basal subtype decreased during NAC and luminal A type increased. Median TMB was 87 (range, 14-570). In prediction model, clinical N3(cN3) stage (Odds ratio [OR] of cN3 vs. not : 4.536, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.925, 44.016, p=0.042) and intrinsic subtype at BC diagnosis (OR of non-luminal vs. luminal types: 0.208, 95% CI: 0.062, 0.604, p=0.001) were associated with pCR. Clinical stage (OR of clinical stage III vs. II: 4.115, 95% CI: 1.094, 19.217, p=0.021), TMB (OR of TMB high vs. low: 0.255, 95% CI: 0.043,1.042, p.value=0.045), MPL genetic alteration (OR of mutation vs. wild type: 16.347, 95% CI: 0.797,1013.88, p.value=0.037), BCL11A (OR of mutation vs. wild type: 16.347, 95% CI: 0.797,1013.88, p.value=0.037) were associated with RCB class (3 vs. others). In terms of DRFS, prediction model consisted of clinical stage (Hazard ratio [HR] of stage III vs. II: 3.496, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.337, 5.654), PIK3CA (HR of mutation vs. wild type: 1.572, 95% CI:-0.008, 3.152) TMB (HR of high vs. low: -1.999. 95% CI:-3.669, -0.329) had c-index of 0.861(95% CI:0.805, 0.916). Conclusions: During NAC, somatic mutation and mutation signature were consistently maintained while intrinsic subtype dynamically changed. In prediction model, TMB, PIK3CA mutation and clinical stage showed predictive roles on DRFS of BC in NAC setting. Citation Format: Ji-Yeon Kim, Kyunghee Park, Woong-Yang Park, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Se Kyung Lee, Zhengyan Kan, Yeon Hee Park. Prediction model of the response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long term survival according to multi-omic profiling in cooperation with clinicopathologic features in patients with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-07.

Background: Hormone-receptor (HR) positive breast cancer is the main subtype of breast cancer. Although overall survival of HR-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients has improved by various therapies including endocrine therapies, CDK4/6 inhibitors, and cytotoxic chemotherapy, it is still considered incurable. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have rarely been clinically tested in HR-positive breast cancer, despite proving anti-cancer activity in early and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in various trials. We evaluated efficacy and safety of combined durvalumab and tremelimumab in the HR-positive MBC, which was enriched with high tumor mutational burden (TMB). Methods: HR-positive MBC patients who received prior 1 or more lines of therapy in metastatic setting were prescreened with whole exome sequencing (WES) using metastatic or recurred tumor biopsies. Criterion of high TMB was defined as upper 30%. In the beginning, the criterion of high TMB was 2.1 mutations per Mb, based on the retrospective WES database in Yonsei Cancer Center and this criterion was recalculated every 30 cases. Patients who met upper 30% of TMB were treated with combined durvalumab (1500mg every 4 weeks upto 13 doses) and tremelimumab (75mg every 4 weeks upto 4 doses). Response was evaluated every 2 cycles using RECIST 1.1 and toxicity was evaluated using NCI-CTCAE 4.03. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) and PD-L1 expression were also analyzed to investigate a correlation with TMB. Results: Biopsies of recurrent or metastatic tumors were taken from a total of 119 patients for WES assay. A median turn-around-time of TMB data was 30.0 days (range, 16~67). Of these 119 patients, a median number of nonsynonymous mutations was 2.0 per Mb (range, 0~21.7) with upper 30% criterion of 3.1. High TMB showed a trend toward old age (P=0.074) and single positivity of estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) compared to positivity of both ER and PR (P=0.055). TMB was positively correlated with TILs (r=0.289, P=0.005). Thirty patients with high TMB received study treatment with a median 2 cycles (range, 1~13). A median prior lines of therapies in metastatic setting was 4 (range, 1~9). The objective response and clinical benefit rates were 6.3% (2 PRs of 30) and 20% (2 PRs plus 4 SDs of 30). There was one treatment-related mortality due to pneumonitis. Immune-related adverse events included endocrinopathy (n=3; hypothyroidism in 2, hyperthyroidism in 1), enteritis (n=2), skin rash (n=2), pneumonitis (n=1), and so on. Biomarker analyses are underway. Conclusions: WES-based TMB using metastatic tumor biopsy was a feasible platform to prescreen HR-positive MBC patients. Combined durvalumab and tremelimumab showed a modest activity and good tolerability in heavily treated, HR-positive MBC with high TMB. Citation Format: Yong Wha Moon, Eunyoung Kim, Min Hwan Kim, Gun Min Kim, Seul-Gi Kim, YeeSoo Chae, Jieun Lee, Jae Ho Jeong, Kyung-Hun Lee, Han Jo Kim, Joo Young Jung, Su-Jin Koh, Kyoung Eun Lee, Hee-Jun Kim, Kyong Hwa Park, Seungtaek Lim, Yeon Hee Park, Tae Hoen Kim, Sewha Kim, Yohan Yang, Sangwoo Kim, Joohyuk Sohn. Phase II trial of durvalumab and tremelimumab in the hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer with high tumor mutational burden selected by whole exome sequencing: Korean cancer study group trial (KCSG BR17-04) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-03.

Background: A combination of a taxane, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (THP) is the standard-of-care (SOC) 1L treatment for patients (pts) with HER2+ mBC; THP demonstrated median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 18.7 mo and overall survival (OS) of 56.5 mo (Swain et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:724-734). However, pts eventually develop resistance to treatment. Novel treatment options are necessary in order to delay the emergence of resistance and provide better clinical outcomes, improve quality of life (QOL), and prolong survival in the 1L setting. T-DXd has demonstrated efficacy in pts with heavily pretreated HER2+ mBC, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 61.4%, duration of response (DOR) of 20.8 mo, and mPFS of 19.4 mo (Modi et al. Cancer Res. 2021. Abstract PD3-06). Data from DESTINY-Breast01 supported global approvals of T-DXd in HER2+ mBC. Here we describe a phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of T-DXd ± pertuzumab compared with THP in the 1L treatment of HER2+ mBC. Trial design: DESTINY-Breast09 (NCT04784715) is a global, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial assessing the efficacy and safety of T-DXd with or without pertuzumab compared with SOC THP as 1L treatment in pts with HER2+ (IHC 3+ or ISH+ assessed locally per ASCO-CAP guidelines and centrally confirmed) advanced or mBC. This study consists of 3 treatment arms: arm A (T-DXd + placebo), arm B (T-DXd + pertuzumab), and arm C (THP). Randomization is 1:1:1 and pts will be stratified by prior treatment status (de novo vs recurrent), hormone receptor status (positive vs negative), and PIK3CA mutation status (detected vs not detected). Pts (N≈1134) must have had no prior chemotherapy or HER2-targeted therapy for advanced or mBC (1 prior line of endocrine therapy is allowed for mBC). The primary endpoint is PFS by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints include PFS by investigator assessment, OS, ORR, DOR, PFS2, health-related quality of life (QOL), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety. Citation Format: Sara M Tolaney, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Zefei Jiang, Yeon Hee Park, Mothaffar Rimawi, Cristina Saura, Andreas Schneeweiss, Masakazu Toi, Tinghui Yu, Jagdish Shetty, Pia Herbolsheimer, Sibylle Loibl. Phase 3 study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) with or without pertuzumab vs a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab in first-line (1L), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC): DESTINY-Breast09 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-14-02.

Purpose: T-DM1, an antibody-drug conjugate, has significant antitumor activity in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients who had progressed after trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. This study was conducted to investigate the clinical practice and factors related with outcomes of T-DM1 use for HER2-positive mBC patients in the nation-wide real-world setting. Method: This complete enumeration study included the patients with HER2-positive mBC who received T-DM1 as palliative therapy from August 2017 to December 2018 under the registry of Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service in Korea. Safety and outcomes of T-DM1 including overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were evaluated. Factors significant in univariate analysis were analyzed in multivariate model. Result: From the sixty institutions, a total of 824 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 58 years-old, 818 patients (99.3%) were female and 516 patients (62.6%) had relapsed after curative treatment. About 40% patients received T-DM1 as first or second line treatment, 21.5% received it as third line and 37.3% as fourth or over line. During a median follow-up of 16.8 months, the ORR was 32.8%, median PFS was 7.2 months and median OS was not reached. In multivariate analysis, clinical factors associated with the lower PFS were age (< 65 year-old, hazard ratio[HR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval[CI]: 1.214-1.919, p < 0.001), poor ECOG performance status (PS ≥ 2, HR 1.98, 95% CI: 1.493-2.626, p < 0.001), previous pertuzumab use (HR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.118-1.742, p = 0.003) and previous lapatinib use (HR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.047-1.586, p =0.017). The common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (13.0%), neutropenia (2.9%), and elevation of liver enzyme (2.5%). Hypokalemia (≤ 3.0 mmol/L) and any-grade bleeding event such as epistaxis and gum-bleeding occurred in 25 (3.1%) and 94 patients (11.4%), respectively. Conclusion: This is the first, nationwide, real-world data about T-DM1 use of the HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients in Korea. The efficacy and toxicity profile of T-DM1 in the real-world practice were comparable with those of randomized trials. Patients’ factors and previous anti-HER2 therapy could predict the outcomes of T-DM1. Further studies to reveal the subtypes of good responders to T-DM1 and the sequence of anti-HER2 therapy are warranted. Citation Format: Sun Kyung Baek, Jae-Ho Jeong, Yeon-Hee Park, Hee Kyung Ahn, Min Hwan Kim, In Hae Park, Young Ju Suh, Dae-Won Lee, Sung Hoon Sim, Jee Hyun Kim, Hyun-Jeong Shim, Yeesoo Chae, Su-Jin Koh, Hyorak Lee, Jieun Lee, Jae-Ho Byun, Youngmi Seol, Eun Mi Lee, Jin Seok Ahn, Kyung-Hae Jung, Seock-Ah Im, Keun Seok Lee, Joohyuk Sohn, Kyoung Eun Lee. A nationwide real-world study for evaluation of efficacy and safety of T-DM1 in patients with HER2-positive locally-advanced unresectable or metastatic breast cancer in Korea (KCSG BR19-15) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-32.

Background Endocrine therapy, the therapeutic mainstay for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, targets estrogen receptor activity and/or estrogen synthesis. CDK4/6 inhibitors cause cell cycle arrest and significantly decrease expression of the proliferation biomarker Ki67 when used in conjunction with aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole. Giredestrant, a highly potent, nonsteroidal, oral, selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader, achieves robust estrogen receptor occupancy, is well tolerated, and has encouraging antitumor activity as a monotherapy and in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in metastatic breast cancer. coopERA Breast Cancer (NCT04436744) is a phase II study investigating 2 weeks of giredestrant versus anastrozole in a window-of-opportunity phase, followed by 4 months of giredestrant plus palbociclib versus anastrozole plus palbociclib in a neoadjuvant phase in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, untreated early breast cancer. We will report the results of the primary analysis. Methods Eligible patients who had measurable cT1c (≥1.5 cm)-cT4a-c estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, untreated early breast cancer and baseline Ki67 score ≥5% were randomized 1:1 to 1 mg oral, daily anastrozole or 30 mg oral, daily giredestrant on Days 1-14 (window-of-opportunity phase lasting 14 days) followed by daily dosing for four 28-day cycles in combination with 125 mg oral palbociclib on Days 1-21 (neoadjuvant phase lasting 16 weeks) before surgery. Patients were stratified according to T status, Ki67 score, and progesterone receptor status. The primary efficacy endpoint was centrally assessed geometric mean relative Ki67 score change from baseline to Week 2 during the window-of-opportunity phase, which is reflective of the ability of endocrine therapies to suppress tumor-cell proliferation, and is a surrogate marker for clinical outcomes. The secondary efficacy endpoint is complete cell cycle arrest rate (CCCA), defined as Ki67 score ≤2.7%, at Week 2. Safety was also assessed. Results Results of a previous interim analysis (including 83 of the planned 202 patients) demonstrated a greater relative reduction of Ki67 at 2 weeks with giredestrant (reduction from baseline to Week 2 geometric mean = 80%; 95% CI = -85%, -72%) compared with anastrozole (reduction from baseline to Week 2 geometric mean = 67%; 95% CI = -75%, -56%; P = 0.0222). Similarly, consistent Ki67 suppression was observed in patients with baseline Ki67 ≥20% (83% reduction with giredestrant versus 71% reduction with anastrozole) or 20%), and updated safety. Conclusions The study will proceed to the primary analysis. We expect to see encouraging results based on the favorable interim analysis data that demonstrated the superior activity of giredestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader, compared with anastrozole. Citation Format: Sara A Hurvitz, Vanesa Quiroga, Yeon Hee Park, Aditya Bardia, Vanesa López-Valverde, Jutta Steinseifer, Tharu M Fernando, Gonzalo Spera, Cloris Xue, Peter A Fasching. Neoadjuvant giredestrant (GDC-9545) + palbociclib versus anastrozole + palbociclib in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, untreated early breast cancer: Primary analysis of the randomized, open-label, phase II coopERA breast cancer study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-06.

Introduction: In HR+, HER2- ABC, activating PIK3CA mutations occur in ~40% of tumors and confer worse prognosis, including endocrine therapy (ET) resistance. BYLieve (NCT03056755) is an ongoing Phase II, open-label, 3-cohort noncomparative study, evaluating the PI3Kα inhibitor and degrader alpelisib (ALP) + ET (fulvestrant [FUL] or letrozole) in patients (pts) with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2- ABC progressing on/after prior treatment, including CDK4/6i + ET. This study is of high clinical relevance as ET + CDK4/6i is the recommended standard of care for first-line treatment of pts with HR+, HER2- ABC. In Cohort A, pts received CDK4/6i + AI as immediate prior therapy and received ALP + FUL as study treatment. In the primary analysis, the primary endpoint was met with 50.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.2%-59.6%) of the 121 pts in the Cohort A modified full analysis set (mFAS) alive and without disease progression at 6 mo. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) were 7.3 mo (95% CI, 5.6-8.3) and 17.3 mo (95% CI, 17.2-20.7), respectively. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) in the 127 pts in the Cohort A safety set were hyperglycemia (28%), rash (9%), and rash maculopapular (9%). This analysis focuses on updated efficacy and safety endpoints reflective of all pts achieving ~18-mo follow-up. Methods: Pts in Cohort A received ≥1 dose of ALP 300 mg orally QD + FUL 500 mg intramuscular Q28D + C1D15. For the 18-mo follow-up, efficacy endpoints, including PFS, OS, overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR) in pts with complete or partial response, and PFS on next line of treatment (PFS2), will be analyzed on the mFAS, which includes pts with a centrally confirmed PIK3CA mutation in tumor tissue. Safety of ALP + FUL, including AEs and laboratory toxicities, will be evaluated in the safety set, which includes all pts who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. Results: Of the 127 pts enrolled in Cohort A and part of the safety set, 121 were included in the mFAS. We will present efficacy endpoint results from the pts in Cohort A along with the long-term safety profile of the ALP + FUL combination. Conclusion: These data will provide insights on the long-term efficacy and safety of ALP + FUL. This combination is currently approved and used, in the clinical setting, for the treatment of pts with HR+, HER2- PIK3CA-mutated ABC. Citation Format: Eva M Ciruelos, Florence Lerebours, Hope S Rugo, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Pamela Drullinsky, Aleix Prat, Thomas Bachelot, Patrick Neven, Yeon Hee Park, Nicholas Turner, Dejan Juric, Ennan Gu, Christina H Arce, Murat Akdere, Stephen Chia. Alpelisib + fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer (ABC) previously treated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) + aromatase inhibitor (AI): 18-month follow-up of BYLieve Cohort A [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-03.

Background: More than two thirds of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) tumors. Current guidelines recommend combining endocrine therapy (ET), such as an aromatase inhibitor (AI), with an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6i) as first-line (1L) treatment (Cardoso et al. Ann Oncol 2020). However, drug resistance eventually develops, leading to disease progression. Mutations in the estrogen receptor (ER) alpha gene (ESR1m) result in constitutively active, estrogen-independent ER signaling which can reduce AI efficiency (Reinert et al. Front Oncol 2017). Clinically, ESR1m are associated with acquired resistance to AI as well as more aggressive disease features, including development of visceral metastasis (Gerratana et al. Eur J Cancer 2021). At the initial diagnosis of mBC, the frequency of ESR1m is low (approximately 3%) (Bidard et al. Ann Oncol 2019); however, this increases to 17−35% of patients when disease progresses on an AI + CDK4/6i (Bidard et al. Ann Oncol 2019; Goetz et al. J Clin Oncol 2020). Patients with ESR1m tumors have poor outcomes with subsequent lines of therapy. New approaches are needed to maximize time on 1L treatment with ET + CDK4/6i and prevent further clinical and radiological disease progression. AZD9833 (camizestrant) is a highly potent, next-generation oral selective ER degrader (ngSERD) and pure ER antagonist that has demonstrated antitumor activity in a wide range of ER+ breast cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models, including those with wild type ESR1 (ESR1wt) and the most prevalent ESR1m, D538G and Y537S (Scott et al. AACR 2020; Lawsone et al. AACR 2020). The Phase I SERENA-1 study demonstrated that AZD9833 shows encouraging clinical activity as monotherapy or in combination with a CDK4/6i in heavily pre-treated patients with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer whose tumors are ESR1wt or ESR1m (Baird et al. SABCS 2020). SERENA-6 will assess the efficacy of switching patients from AI to AZD9833, while continuing CDK4/6i treatment, once ESR1m are detected but before overt disease progression. Study description: SERENA-6 is an ongoing, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, Phase III trial. Patients with HR+/HER2− mBC who have received at least 6 months of 1L AI (letrozole or anastrozole) + CDK4/6i (palbociclib or abemaciclib) and do not have clinical or radiological disease progression will be enrolled into Step 1, the ESR1m detection phase. During this phase, patients will be monitored regularly for the presence of ESR1m via central circulating tumor DNA analysis. Patients with detectable ESR1m and no overt disease progression (by RECIST v1.1 criteria) will be enrolled into Step 2 double-blind 1:1 randomization to either continue AI plus CDK4/6i, plus a placebo for AZD9833, or switch to AZD9833 (75 mg oral once daily), plus the same CDK4/6i plus a placebo for the AI. The primary endpoint will be investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 criteria. A key secondary endpoint will be time to second progression or death on a subsequent therapy. Other secondary endpoints will include overall survival, chemotherapy-free survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. Enrollment began in June 2021 and is expected at approximately 200 sites across 19 countries. Acknowledgments: We thank Julia Mawer, PhD, of Oxford PharmaGenesis, UK, for medical writing assistance, which was funded by AstraZeneca. Funding: The SERENA-6 trial is funded and overseen by AstraZeneca. Citation Format: François-Clément Bidard, Kevin Kalinsky, Massimo Cristofanilli, Giampaolo Bianchini, Stephen KL Chia, Wolfgang Janni, Cynthia X Ma, Erica L Mayer, Yeon Hee Park, Steven Fox, Xiaochun Liu, Andrew Walding, Cynthia Huang Bartlett, Nick C Turner. SERENA-6: A Phase III study to assess the efficacy and safety of AZD9833 (camizestrant) compared with aromatase inhibitors when given in combination with palbociclib or abemaciclib in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with detectable ESR1m who have not experienced disease progression on first-line therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-11-05.

Background: Prognosis of patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been revolutionized with the development of monoclonal antibodies targeting HER-2 and antibody-drug conjugate, but resistance to anti-HER-2 therapy is inevitable ultimately. PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway aberration is known to be one of the key resistance mechanisms. BR18-13(KM-10A) study is a phase 2 clinical trial evaluating efficacy and safety of Herzuma® (trastuzumab biosimilar) plus Gedatolisib (dual PI3K/mTORC inhibitor) in patients with HER-2 positive MBC who progressed after multiple lines of therapy. Methods: Patients with HER-2 positive MBC with known PIK3CA pathologic mutation or amplification whose disease progressed after more than 2 HER-2 directed therapy were enrolled in the study. They received Herzuma® (8mg/kg IV for 1st cycle loading dose, and then 6mg/kg IV every 3 weeks) plus Gedatolisib (180mg on D1, 8, 15 of every 21 days). We evaluated efficacy of the combination treatment as interim analysis. The data cutoff of this interim analysis was June 8, 2021. Results: 17 patients were enrolled and followed for a median of 6.2 months. At data cutoff, 17 patients were eligible for response assessment. All patients were confirmed to have pathologic PIK3CA aberrations: 9 kinase mutations (H1047X), 5 helical mutations (E545X), 2 other point mutations, and 1 amplification. Overall, response rate was 64.7% and disease control rate was 82.4%. Eleven patients reached partial response (PR) as their best response, three were stable disease (SD), and three had progressive disease (PD). Two patients who have reached PR remain on investigational treatment until the data cutoff point, and the longest one is on treatment for 12.0 months. The median progression-free survival assessed in data cutoff time was 5.9 months. One patient ended treatment due to CNS disease progression, but her visceral metastatic lesions were decreased with experimental treatment. No fatal adverse events related to trial medication were reported. Conclusion: In this phase 2 study, Trastuzumab biosimilar plus Gedatolisib presented 64.7% of response rate with manageable toxicity in patients with HER-2 positive MBC with PIK3CA mutation. Clinical trial information: NCT03698383 Acknowledgement: this research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health &Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant number: HI17C2206). Citation Format: Ju Won Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Jong Gwon Choi, Yee Soo Chae, Gyeong-Won Lee, Keon Uk Park, Eunmi Lee, Sung Hoon Sim, Jee Hyun Kim, Yeon Hee Park, Miso Kim, Jin Hyun Park, Jeong Eun Kim, Han Jo Kim, Mi Sun Ahn, So Yeon Oh, Min Hwan Kim, Su-Jin Koh, Kyoung Eun Lee, Myoung Joo Kang, Jae Ho Byun, Joo Young Ha, Jung Hye Kwon, Joo Young Jung, Su Ee Lee, Inhae Park, Kyong Hwa Park. Phase II study of trastuzumab biosimilar (Herzuma®) plus gedatolisib in patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer who progressed after 2 or more HER-2 directed chemotherapy (BR 18-13, KM-10A): Interim analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-03.

Background: Neutrotrophin receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) gene fusions (NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3) are oncogenic drivers of various tumor types. The NTRK fusion was detected in less than 5% of breast, colorectal, lung or any other types of cancers. However, large scaled next generation sequencing data for NTRK fusion in breast cancer have not existed. In this study, we performed RNASeq and fusion analysis including NTRK genes. Methods: We prospectively collected BC tumor tissues from the translational research conducted in Samsung Medical Center. Fusion was predicted from RNAseq using the following seven softwares(SWs): ChimeraScan, DeFuse, MapSplice, TophatFusion, STAR.Arriba, STAR.fusion, and STAR.SEQR. To remove false-positive fusion calls, calls less than 3 left/right spanning reads and 10 total supporting reads were removed. After filtering out the blacklist fusion calls which were recurrently detected, calls commonly predicted in more than two SWs were analyzed. Results: In total 629 BC samples, 613 samples were finally analyzed after quality control (QC) of RNASeq. According to immunohistochemistry (IHC) profile, 356(58.7%) was hormone receptor (HR) positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative BC, 42 (6.9%) of HR positive HER2 positive BC, 53 (8.7%) of HR negative, HER2 positive and 155(25.6%) of triple negative BC (TNBC). PAM50 prediction informed that 174(28.9%) of luminal A, 151(24.6%) of luminal B, 170 (27.7%) of basal-like, 85 (13.9%) of HER2-enriched and 33 (5.4%) of normal. In median number of fusion events, 12 was called by ChimeraScan (Interquartile range [IQR]: 5, 33), 57 by DeFuse (IQR: 33, 82), eight by Mapsplice (IQR: 5, 12), two by TophatFusion (IQR: 0, 4), five by STAR.Arriba (IQR: 2, 12), two by STAR.fusion (IQR:0, 5) and three by STAR.SEQR fusion caller (IQR: 1, 7) after call filtering. After initial fusion call, we excluded the results from ChimeraScan and DeFuse fusion callers because of discrepancy of number of called fusion events. In five fusion callers, median number of fusion events was eight (IQR :2,20) per BC sample. In terms of NTRK fusion, we detected NTRK2-BANCR fusion event in one TNBC patients (1/425, 0.2%). This fusion was detected in four of five SWs for fusion detection with significant number of supporting reads in RNASeq. NTRK2-BANCR fusion was the out-of-frame fusion, which C-terminal truncated protein kinase domain of NTRK2 and its partner long non-coding RNA BANCR was combined and RNA expression of this fusion was increased. Other fusion events of BCs were NCOR2-PARP4 (3.7%), BRD4-NWD1 (3.7%), ESR1-RGS17 (1.8%), FGFR1-TACC1 (0.2%) and MKRN1-BRAF (0.2%). In BC subtype according to IHC, fusion events were more frequently observed in TNBC compared with other subtypes regardless of the type of fusion filters. In terms of intrinsic subtype, fusion events were most frequently observed in basal like type and least in normal like intrinsic subtype (all ps Citation Format: Ji-Yeon Kim, Kyunghee Park, Woong-Yang Park, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Jonghan Yu, Young-Hyuck Im, Jin Seok Ahn, Yeon Hee Park. Fusion analysis including NTRK fusion in breast cancers (BC): From RNASeq data analysis from 629 BC tissue samples [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-08.

CDK4/6 inhibitors such as palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) have remarkablyimproved the outcome of patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, manypatients are intrinsically resistant to CDK4/6i therapy, and those who respond eventually acquireresistance. Although high baseline CCNE1 expression and rare alterations in RB1 and FAT1 geneshave been shown to be associated with CDK4/6i resistance, the molecular mechanisms of CDK4/6iresistance are complex and remain poorly understood. To better understand and overcome CDK4/6iresistance, we performed multi-omics profiling of paired tumor biopsies from ER+/HER2- MBCpatients treated with palbociclib combined with ET. Tumor biopsies taken at pre-treatment, on-treatment, and progressive disease (PD) from 71 patients were profiled using whole-exomesequencing (WES), whole-transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) and IHC analysis. Ourcomprehensive analysis identified several tumor intrinsic molecular markers associated with worsePFS, including the Luminal B subtype (p=0.012, HR=2.593), BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutation (p=0.012,HR=2.67) and mutation signatures linked to APOBEC enzymatic activity (p=0.002, HR=3.19).Conversely, the estrogen response signature (p=0.006, HR=0.43) was associated with favorableprognosis. Unsupervised analysis revealed a cluster of tumors enriched in homologousrecombination deficiency (HRD) linked genomic scars that was associated with poor prognosis(p=0.005, HR=2.49). Of note, these HRD-high tumors responded even more poorly to treatment whenco-occurring with TP53 somatic mutations. Integrative analysis further identified three poorprognosis clusters (IC2-4) enriched in Luminal B, proliferative and HRD features when compared tothe favorable prognosis cluster (IC1).Comparing baseline vs. PD samples, we observed a pattern of post-treatment enrichment for the poorprognosis markers. In addition, breast cancer-associated genes such as BRCA1/2, TP53 and PTENharbored a higher prevalence of genomic alterations including somatic mutation, amplification,. deletion and gene fusion at PD. Cell cycle gene expression and signatures also markedly increased atPD compared to baseline whereas estrogen response signatures decreased. Upon diseaseprogression, tumors had frequently switched to molecular subtypes with aggressive and estrogenindependent characteristics, demonstrating high plasticity in response to CDK4/6i and ET treatment.These patterns of acquired resistance were validated by IHC analysis of cyclins E1 and E2, Ki67 andpRb. To investigate the genomic alterations responsible for acquired resistance, we compared 21paired baseline and PD samples. We observed that PD-specific RB1 loss-of-function events occurredwith higher prevalence than previously reported, underscoring a major role of cell cycle de-regulation in conferring resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition. In this prospective longitudinal multi-omicsstudy, we identified novel candidate biomarkers that can be used to improve prediction of responseto CDK4/6i. In addition, we derived new insights into the molecular mechanisms of drug resistanceto palbociclib plus ET that will help guide therapeutic strategies and drug development inHR+/HER2− MBC. Citation Format: Zhengyan Kan, Seock-Ah Im, Kyunghee Park, Ji Wen, Kyung-Hun Lee, Yoon-La Choi, Won-Chul Lee, Ahrum Min, Vinicius Bonato, Seri Park, Sripad Ram, Dae-Won Lee, Ji-Yeon Kim, Su Kyeong Lee, Won-Woo Lee, Jisook Lee, Miso Kim, Scott L. Weinrich, Han Suk Ryu, Tae Yong Kim, Stephen Dann, Diane Fernandez, Jiwon Koh, Song Yi Park, Shibing Deng, Eric Powell, Rupesh Kanchi Ravi, Jadwiga Bienkowska, Paul A. Rejto, Woong-Yang Park, Yeon Hee Park. Serial genomic profiling reveals molecular mechanisms of breast cancer resistance to palbociclib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-08.

Background: We analyzed the treatment outcome of breast cancer patients with brain metastases (BM) in Korea to identify the prognostic factors and the role of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Methods: Seven hundred thirty patients of breast cancer with BM treated at 17 institutions in Korea from 2000 to 2014 were analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 12 months. The analysis consisted of three cohorts: in cohort A, a total of 730 patients were included; in cohort B, 538 patients with available follow-up imaging after initial brain-directed treatment; and in cohort C, 54 patients receiving salvage WBRT due to recurrent BM after initial Stereotactic radiosurgery or WBRT. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from BM diagnosis in cohort A or from the last day of salvage WBRT in cohort C. Results: Median OS of cohort A was 15 months. In multivariate analysis, histologic grade 3, extracranial metastasis, number of BM >4, hormone receptor (HR) or HER2 negativity, and shorter time interval to diagnosis of BM were associated with inferior OS. Among 538 patients in cohort B, 201 showed subsequent development of new BM at a median of 11 months after stereotactic radiosurgery or WBRT for the management of initial BM (at 1 year, HR+/HER2- 51.9%, HER2+ 44.0%, and TNBC 69.6%, respectively; p=0.008). Upfront WBRT reduced subsequent development of new BM, which showed the significant difference among molecular subtypes (HR+/HER2-, 42% reduction at 1 year, p4, and involvement of both tentoria increased subsequent development of new BM. Anti-HER2 therapy for HER2+ patients and upfront WBRT significantly reduced risk of new BM. In cohort C, upfront WBRT prolonged the salvage WBRT-free duration (median 6.9 vs. 8.7 months, p=0.058). Median OS was 6.8 months after salvage WBRT. Longer interval to salvage WBRT, controlled primary tumor, high dose of salvage WBRT (BED10 >37.5 Gy), and systemic treatment after salvage WBRT showed better OS. Uncontrolled extracranial systemic disease and salvage WBRT due to local progression without distant intracranial failure showed worse OS. Conclusions: The rates of new BM showed the significant differences among molecular subtypes. Upfront WBRT decreased subsequent development of new BM and this effect was dependent on the molecular subtype as well. Anti-HER2 therapy for HER2+ patients significantly decreased the subsequent development of new BM. On salvage WBRT setting, the patients having high dose of salvage WBRT, stable extracranial systemic disease and subsequent systemic therapy showed better OS. Citation Format: Jae Sik Kim, Kyubo Kim, Wonguen Jung, Kyung Hwan Shin, Seock-Ah Im, Hee-Jun Kim, Yong Bae Kim, Jee Suk Chang, Jee Hyun Kim, Doo Ho Choi, Yeon Hee Park, Dae Yong Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Byung Ock Choi, Sea-Won Lee, Suzy Kim, Jeanny Kwon, Ki Mun Kang, Woong-Ki Chung, Kyung Su Kim, Won Sup Yoon, Jin Hee Kim, Jihye Cha, Yoon Kyeong Oh, In Ah Kim. Multicenter study for brain metastasis from breast cancer in Korea: The significance of molecular subtype (KROG 1612) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-21-01.

IntroductionImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is one of the standard treatment strategies in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the benefit of ICI with chemotherapy is limited in metastatic TNBC. In this study, we evaluated the effect of PD-L1 and LAG-3 expression on tissue microenvironment of mTNBC treated with ICI.MethodsWe reviewed representative formalin-fixed paraffin embedded specimens from metastatic or archival tumor tissues of TNBCs who treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in metastatic setting. We used the Opal multiplex Detection kit with six antibodies (anti-PD-L1, anti-LAG-3, anti-CD68, anti-panCK, anti-CD8, anti-CD107a/LAMP antibody).ResultsWe evaluated the association between LAG-3+cells and survival outcome regarding CK expression. Stromal LAG-3+/CK+ and LAG-3+/CK- cells were not associated with ICI-progression free survival(PFS) (P=0.16). However, LAG-3+ cell distributions in the tumor area impacted on ICI-PFS. A high density of LAG-3+CK+ cells was associated with shorter ICI-PFS compared with low densities of both LAG-3+CK+ and LAG-3+CK- cells (1.9 vs. 3.5 months). In addition, a high density of LAG-3+CK- cells had a relatively longer ICI-PFS compared with other groups (P=0.01). In terms of total area, the pattern of densities of LAG-3+CK+ cells and LAG-3+CK- cells were similar to those in the tumor area In addition, ICI-PFS of LAG-3+CK- and LAG-3+CK+ cell densities in the total area was equal to that in the tumor area.DiscussionIn conclusion, our findings revealed tumor-intrinsic LAG-3 expression was the resistance mechanism toward PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in mTNBCs. Multivariate analysis also suggested that LAG-3 expression in tumor cells was an independent predictive biomarker.

Background To investigate outcomes of salvage whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for recurrent brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer (BC), to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS), and to propose a novel prognostic classification for OS in these patients. Materials and methods We identified 54 patients who had received salvage WBRT as the second brain-focused treatment for recurrent BM from BC (2000–2014). The median follow-up duration was 4.9 months. A recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was conducted to develop a model to predict OS at the time of salvage WBRT. Results The median OS was 6.8 months. OS according to BC-specific graded prognostic assessment (breast-GPA), modified breast-GPA, and updated breast-GPA did not represent our cohort. In the multivariate analysis, a long time before salvage WBRT (≥16 months), control of primary BC or extracranial metastases, systemic treatment after salvage WBRT, and administration of a biologically effective dose for an α/β of 10 Gy (BED10) of salvage WBRT >37.5 Gy showed superior OS. We proposed three RPA classes based on the control of both primary BC and extracranial metastasis and BED10 of salvage WBRT: class I, class II, and class III. In this model, patients with class I experienced the best OS (34.6 months; class II, 5.0 months; class III, 2.4 months; P, Highlights • Multicenter retrospective study of salvage WBRT for recurrent brain metastasis. • Subsequent use of systemic treatment after salvage WBRT showing better OS. • Limitations of previous graded prognostic assessments for recurrent brain metastasis. • Novel RPA classification consisting of four simple clinical factors predicts OS.

Several studies have suggested that estrogens have a protective function against lymphomagenesis. The treatment of breast cancer is driven by subtype classification, and the assessment of hormone receptor status is important for treatment selection. Thus, we evaluated the association between breast cancer and the incidence of NHL. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a population-based nationwide registry in South Korea. We selected all women with newly diagnosed breast cancer between January 1st, 2002 and December 31st, 2016 who received curative treatment (N = 84,969) and a 1:10 sample of age-matched non-breast cancer controls (N = 1,057,674). Incident breast cancer (time-varying exposure) was the exposure and development of any type of NHL, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mature T/NK-cell lymphomas, anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), and unspecified types of NHL, was the outcome. During follow-up, 1564 incident cases of NHL occurred. The fully adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) for NHL associated with the development of breast cancer was 1.64 (95% CI = 1.34–2.00) after adjusting for body mass index, alcohol intake, physical activity, smoking, income, and comorbidity. The adjusted HR for NHL was much higher in participants who were aged

BackgroundFertility is an important issue for young women with breast cancer, but studies about physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward fertility preservation (FP) are largely based on Western populations and do not reflect recent international guidelines for FP. In this international study, we aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of physicians from South Korea, other Asian countries, and Latin America toward FP in young women with breast cancer, and identify the related barriers.MethodsThe survey was conducted anonymously among physicians from South Korea, other Asian countries, and Latin America involved in breast cancer care between November 2020 and July 2021. Topics included knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions toward FP; practice behaviors; barriers; and participant demographics. We grouped related questions around two main themes—discussion with patients about FP, and consultation and referral to a reproductive endocrinologist. We analyzed the relationships between main questions and other survey items.ResultsA total of 151 physicians completed the survey. Most participants’ overall knowledge about FP was good. More than half of the participants answered that they discussed FP with their patients in most cases, but that personnel to facilitate discussions about FP and the provision of educational materials were limited. A major barrier was time constraints in the clinic (52.6%). Discussion, consultations, and referrals were more likely to be performed by surgeons who primarily treated patients with operable breast cancer (FP discussion odds ratio [OR]: 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24–6.79; FP consultation and referral OR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.14–7.74). Participants’ knowledge and attitudes about FP were significantly associated with discussion, consultations, and referrals.ConclusionPhysicians from South Korea, other Asian countries, and Latin America are knowledgeable about FP and most perform practice behaviors toward FP well. Physicians’ knowledge and favorable attitudes are significantly related to discussion with patients, as well as consultation with and referral to reproductive endocrinologists. However, there are also barriers, such as limitations to human resources and materials, suggesting a need for a systematic approach to improve FP for young women with breast cancer.

There is a strong rationale for combining HER2-targeted therapies with cancer immunotherapy to increase efficacy in breast cancer, particularly in the early-stage setting, where the immune system has not been weakened by heavy pretreatment. ASTEFANIA aims to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant atezolizumab in combination with ado-trastuzumab emtansine in patients with high-risk, HER2-positive early breast cancer and residual disease following HER2-based neoadjuvant therapy. Eligible patients will be randomized to receive ado-trastuzumab emtansine in combination with either atezolizumab or placebo for 14 cycles within 12 weeks of primary surgery. The primary outcome is invasive disease-free survival and secondary outcomes include additional efficacy end points, safety and pharmacokinetics. The study plans to enroll 1700 patients across 32 counties. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04873362 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

Breast cancer (BC) among Asians accounts for ~ 40% of the global BC burden. Differences in BC risk, presentation, tumor biology, and response to treatment exist between Asian and non-Asian patients; however, Asian patients are often under-represented in clinical trials. This narrative review summarizes the efficacy and safety of pharmacological therapies for BC in Asian populations, with a focus on outcomes in Asian versus non-Asian patients treated with chemotherapy, hormone therapy, anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 targeted therapies, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, bone-targeted therapies, poly-ADP ribose polymerase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase, and checkpoint inhibitors. While most therapies have demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety in Asian and non-Asian patients with BC, differences that are largely attributed to pharmacogenetic variations between populations exist. Pharmacogenetic differences may contribute to a reduced clinical benefit of tamoxifen, whereas improved clinical outcomes have been reported with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and CDK4/6 inhibitors in Asian versus non-Asian patients with BC. In particular, Asian patients have an increased incidence of hematological toxicities, including neutropenia, although adverse events can be effectively managed using dose adjustments. Recent trials with CDK4/6 inhibitors have increased efforts to include Asians within study subsets. Future clinical trials enrolling higher numbers of Asian patients, and an increased understanding of differences in patient and tumor genetics between Asians and non-Asians, have the potential to incrementally improve the management of BC in Asian patients.

Introduction: Alpelisib (ALP), an inhibitor and degrader of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase α (PI3Kα), + fulvestrant (FUL) demonstrated efficacy in PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2- ABC in the phase 3 SOLAR-1 trial, which included only 20 patients (pts) with prior CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) in the PIK3CA-mutated cohort. BYLieve (NCT03056755), a phase 2, open-label, 3-cohort noncomparative study, evaluates ALP + endocrine therapy (ET; FUL or letrozole [LET]) in pts with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2- ABC, progressing on/after prior therapies, including CDKi + ET. Cohorts A and B were restricted to pts receiving CDKi + (aromatase inhibitor [AI] or FUL), respectively, as immediate prior therapy, but Cohort C included pts whose cancer progressed on/after AI (in adjuvant or metastatic setting), and who received chemotherapy (CT; any line), or ET (FUL or LET monotherapy or with targeted therapy, including CDKi + FUL, but not CDKi + AI) as immediate prior treatment. Cohorts A and B demonstrated efficacy and safety of ALP + ET after prior CDKi. Here, we report primary results and biomarker analyses from Cohort C.. Methods: Pts in Cohort C received ALP 300 mg orally QD + FUL 500 mg intramuscular Q28D + C1D15. The primary endpoint was assessed in each cohort separately and is the proportion of pts with centrally confirmed PIK3CA mutation alive and without disease progression at 6 mo per local assessment; 95% CIs are calculated using Clopper and Pearson (1934) exact method. The 95% CI lower bound of the primary endpoint >30% is clinically meaningful evidence of treatment effect. In an exploratory analysis of baseline biomarkers using ctDNA, progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated in pt subgroups per high (≥10%) or low ( Citation Format: Hope S Rugo, Patrick Neven, Isabel Saffie, Yeon Hee Park, Michelino De Laurentiis, Florence Lerebours, Eva Maria Ciruelos, Nicholas Turner, Dejan Juric, Ennan Gu, Christina H Arce, Mukta Joshi, Estelle Roux, Murat Akdere, Stephen Chia. Alpelisib + fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2— advanced breast cancer (ABC) who received chemotherapy or endocrine therapy (ET) as immediate prior treatment: BYLieve Cohort C primary results and exploratory biomarker analyses [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-05.

[Background] As the development of endocrine resistance and late recurrences are the major clinical concerns in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, biomarkers to predict the occurrence of endocrine resistance or disease progression are crucial for improving patient outcomes. Aberrant HGF/c-MET signaling pathway has been reported to play a role in various cellular processes in cancer. Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations, encoding estrogen receptor α, are associated with endocrine resistance in HR+ breast cancer. PIK3CA hotspot mutations that induce hyperactivation of the PI3K are found in 30-40% of HR+ advanced breast cancers. In this context, we evaluated the prognostic values of c-MET-enriched CTC, ESR1 mutations, PIK3CA mutations, and cfDNA concentrations detected in the blood of HR+HER2- MBC patients. [Methods] MBC patients were prospectively enrolled during standard treatments at Samsung Medical Center (IRB No.2019-08-119). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were isolated using the GenoCTC® with c-MET-enriched or EpCAM-enriched CTC isolation kits (Genobio Corp., South Korea) from 4mL of blood each. PIK3CA and ESR1 hotspot mutations were analyzed by droplet digital PCR kits (Gencurix Inc., South Korea). cfDNA concentrations were calculated using ESR1 gene copy numbers from plasma. To compare the proportion of c-MET overexpression between primary breast tumors and metastatic sites in HR+HER2- breast cancer patients, primary breast (n=358) and metastatic sites (n=27) were independently collected. c-MET expression was evaluated by an immunohistochemistry assay using an anti-total c-MET (SP44) antibody with a Ventana Discovery XY automated system according to the manufacturer’s instruction. c-MET overexpression was defined if the staining was scored as 2+ or 3+. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from blood draw to the first of either disease progression or death during standard therapy. [Results] Out of 93 patients with HR+ MBC, analysis was performed in 63 HR+HER2- MBC patients. Seventeen patients (27%) had one or more EpCAM-enriched CTCs, and fourteen patients (22%) had one or more c-MET-enriched CTCs detected in their blood. The median follow-up time and median time to censoring were 8.4 months and 18.7 months, respectively. According to the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis by log-rank test, c-MET-enriched CTCs, cfDNA concentrations, and ESR1 mutations were significantly associated with PFS (p=0.0026, 0.0064, and 0.011, respectively). However, PIK3CA mutations and EpCAM-enriched CTCs were not statistically significant with PFS (p=0.38 and 0.86, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that both c-MET-enriched CTCs (HR=3.5, p=0.014) and cfDNA concentrations (HR=2.2, p=0.031) were independent predictors for PFS in HR+HER2- MBC. The proportion of c-MET overexpression was significantly higher in metastatic sites (22.2%) than in primary breast tumors (4.7%) in HR+HER2- breast cancer patients (p=0.00002). As c-MET-enriched CTCs and cfDNA concentrations were independent predictors of disease progression, patients were divided into two groups depending on the result of c-MET-enriched CTCs and cfDNA concentration. When patients with low c-MET-enriched CTC and cfDNA concentrations were classified as a low-risk group and other patients into a high-risk group, the high-risk group had a shorter PFS than the low-risk group (p=0.003). [Conclusion] This study provided c-MET-enriched CTCs and cfDNA concentrations calculated by ESR1 copy numbers in patient blood were significant independent predictors of disease progression in HR+HER2- MBC. The poor prognosis in the c-MET-enriched CTC-high group and the difference in the c-MET overexpression rate between the primary breast and metastatic sites suggested the importance of monitoring c-MET-enriched CTCs in the blood of HR+HER2- MBC patients. Citation Format: Jieun Park, Eun Sol Chang, Ji-Yeon Kim, Chaithanya Chelakkot, Minjung Sung, Ji-Young Song, Kyungsoo Jung, Na Young Kim, Hyegyeong Lee, Mi-Ran Kang, Yeon Hee Park, Young Kee Shin, Yoon-La Choi. The prognostic value of c-MET monitoring by using c-MET-enriched circulating tumor cells in HR-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-06-04.

Purpose This single-arm phase II trial investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.Materials and Methods Patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes were enrolled. Patients received S-1 (40-60 mg depending on patient’s body surface area, twice a day, day 1-14) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, day 1) in 3 weeks cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor 1.1. Secondary endpoints included time-to-progression (TTP), duration-of-response (DoR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events.Results A total of 87 patients were enrolled from 11 institutions in Korea. Hormone receptor was positive in 54 (62.1%) patients and six (6.9%) had human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive disease. Forty-eight patients (85.1%) had visceral metastasis and 74 (55.2%) had more than three sites of metastases. The ORR of SOX regimen was 38.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.9 to 50.0) with a median TTP of 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 6.9). Median DoR and OS were 10.3 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 15.1) and 19.4 (95% CI, not estimated) months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was reported in 28 patients (32.1%) and thrombocytopenia was observed in 23 patients (26.6%).Conclusion This phase II study showed that SOX regimen is a reasonable option in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

Background: Given that peak age of breast cancer (BC) is younger in Asians than in Western populations, relatively higher prevalence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) has been reported. This study aimed to analyze the characteristics and clinical outcomes of PABC in Korea. Methods: We defined PABC as BC diagnosed during pregnancy or in the first postpartum year. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and BC outcomes between patients with PABC and non-PABC patients in the prospective YBC cohort from Samsung Medical Center. Results: In total, 1492 patients were initially enrolled, and 1364 patients were included, of which 93 had PABC (6.8%). The median age of patients with PABC was 34 years. Hormone receptor expression was lower (64.6% vs 74.6%) and frequency of HER2 overexpression was higher (26.9% vs 17.6%) in patients with PABC than in non-PABC patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83.2% and 93.4% in patients with PABC and non-PABC patients, respectively (p < 0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 72.2% and 83.8% in PABC and non-PABC patients. Conclusion: Compared to non-PABC patients, patients with PABC had poorer OS and DFS in this prospective cohort. Exploratory biomarker analysis for PABC is warranted.

Introduction IMC-001 is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to human PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1). This study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of IMC-001 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Materials and Methods This open-labeled phase I study used a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, with doses ranging from 2 to 20 mg/kg. IMC-001 was administered intravenously every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dose-limiting toxicity window was defined as 21 days from the first dose. Results Fifteen subjects were included in 5 dose-escalation cohorts. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common adverse events (AEs) were general weakness, decreased appetite, fever, and cough. No grade 4 or 5 treatment emergent AEs were reported during the study. One subject in the 2 mg/kg cohort showed grade 2 immune-induced thyroiditis and diabetes mellitus suspected to be related to IMC-001. Over the dose range of 2–20 mg/kg IMC-001, the AUC0–14d, AUC0—∞, and Cmax generally increased in a dose-proportional manner for each step of dose escalation. Of the 15 enrolled patients, 1 subject with rectal cancer showed a partial response, and the disease control rate was 33.3%. Conclusions IMC-001 demonstrated a favorable safety profile up to 20 mg/kg administered intravenously every 2 weeks and showed preliminary efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, 20 mg/kg was selected as the recommended phase II dose. Clinical trial identification NCT03644056 (date of registration: August 23, 2018).

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to develop a machine learning(ML) based model to accurately predict pathologic complete response(pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) using pretreatment clinical and pathological characteristics of electronic medical record(EMR) data in breast cancer(BC).Methods The EMR data from patients diagnosed with early and locally advanced BC and who received NAC followed by curative surgery were reviewed. A total of 16 clinical and pathological characteristics was selected to develop ML model. We practiced six ML models using default settings for multivariate analysis with extracted variables. ResultsIn total, 2,065 patients were included in this analysis. Overall, 30.6% (n=632) of patients achieved pCR. Among six ML models, the LightGBM had the highest area under the curve (AUC) for pCR prediction. After hyper-parameter tuning with Bayesian optimization, AUC was 0.810. Performance of pCR prediction models in different histology-based subtypes was compared. The AUC was highest in HR+HER2- subgroup and lowest in HR-/HER2- subgroup (HR+/HER2- 0.841, HR+/HER2+ 0.716, HR-/HER2 0.753, HR-/HER2- 0.653).ConclusionsA ML based pCR prediction model using pre-treatment clinical and pathological characteristics provided useful information to predict pCR during NAC. This prediction model would help to determine treatment strategy in patients with BC planned NAC.

PURPOSE In the phase III SOLAR-1 trial ( NCT02437318 ), the PI3Kα-selective inhibitor and degrader alpelisib significantly improved median progression-free survival when added to fulvestrant in patients with phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha ( PIK3CA)–mutated, hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer. We assessed health-related quality of life using patient-reported outcome measures in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the PIK3CA-mutant cohort, 341 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive alpelisib 300 mg daily or placebo plus fulvestrant 500 mg on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL of Cancer Patients and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form questionnaires. Changes from baseline and time to 10% deterioration were analyzed using repeated measurement models and Cox models, respectively. RESULTS Global Health Status/QoL and functional status were maintained from baseline (mean changes < 10 points) in the alpelisib (overall change from baseline [95% CI], −3.50 [−8.02 to 1.02]) and placebo arms (overall change from baseline [95% CI], 0.27 [−4.48 to 5.02]). Overall treatment effect in Global Health Status/QoL was not significantly different between arms (−3.77; 95% CI, −8.35 to 0.80; P = .101). Time to 10% deterioration for Global Health Status/QoL was similar between arms (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.48). Compared with placebo, deterioration in social functioning and in diarrhea, appetite loss, nausea or vomiting, and fatigue symptom subscales occurred with alpelisib. Numerical improvement in Worst Pain was observed with alpelisib versus placebo (42% v 32%, week 24; P = .090). CONCLUSION In SOLAR-1, there was no statistical difference in deterioration of Global Health Status/QoL between arms, whereas symptom subscales favored placebo for diarrhea, appetite loss, nausea or vomiting, and fatigue, known side effects of alpelisib. Treatment decisions must consider efficacy and tolerability; taken with clinical efficacy, these results support the benefit-risk profile of alpelisib in patients with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer.

Summary Background Alpelisib, a PI3Kα-selective inhibitor and degrader, plus fulvestrant showed efficacy in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer in SOLAR-1; limited data are available in the post-cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor setting. BYLieve aimed to assess alpelisib plus endocrine therapy in this setting in three cohorts defined by immediate previous treatment; here, we report results from cohort A. Methods This ongoing, phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative study enrolled patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer with tumour PIK3CA mutation, following progression on or after previous therapy, including CDK4/6 inhibitors, from 114 study locations (cancer centres, medical centres, university hospitals, and hospitals) in 18 countries worldwide. Participants aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, with no more than two previous anticancer treatments and no more than one previous chemotherapy regimen, were enrolled in three cohorts. In cohort A, patients must have had progression on or after a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus an aromatase inhibitor as the immediate previous treatment. Patients received oral alpelisib 300 mg/day (continuously) plus fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly on day 1 of each 28-day cycle and on day 15 of cycle 1. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive without disease progression at 6 months per local assessment using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, in patients with a centrally confirmed PIK3CA mutation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03056755 . Findings Between Aug 14, 2017, and Dec 17, 2019 (data cutoff), 127 patients with at least 6 months' follow-up were enrolled into cohort A. 121 patients had a centrally confirmed PIK3CA mutation. At data cutoff, median follow-up was 11·7 months (IQR 8·5–15·9). 61 (50·4%; 95% CI 41·2–59·6) of 121 patients were alive without disease progression at 6 months. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were hyperglycaemia (36 [28%] of 127 patients), rash (12 [9%]), and rash maculopapular (12 [9%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 33 (26%) of 127 patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Interpretation BYLieve showed activity of alpelisib plus fulvestrant with manageable toxicity in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, after progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus an aromatase inhibitor. Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Background Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201) is an antibody-drug conjugate with a HER2 antibody, tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker, and a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. DESTINY-Breast01 (NCT03248492) is an open-label, international, multicenter, phase 2 study of T-DXd in patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and supported regulatory approval in the US and Japan. Updated longer-term safety and efficacy results are presented here. Methods All patients were required to have MBC that progressed on or after T-DM1. 253 patients were enrolled and 184 received T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg, representing the primary analysis set. The primary endpoint was ORR. Additional endpoints included duration of response, PFS, and OS. Results Patients had received a median of 6 previous lines of treatment for MBC. In this updated data cutoff (8 June 2020) compared to the prior data cutoff (1 Aug 2019), median duration of follow-up has increased from 11.1 to 20.5 mo; 37 patients (20.1%) remain on treatment. Confirmed ORR was 61.4% (12 CRs) with a median duration of response of 20.8 mo; the disease control rate was 97.3% (95% CI, 93.8-99.1). The updated mPFS was 19.4 mo (95% CI, 14.1 mo-NE). Estimated OS was 85% (95% CI, 79%-90%) at 12 months and 74% (95% CI, 67%-80%) at 18 months. The preliminary mOS is 24.6 mo (estimated at 35% maturity with only 17 patients at risk at 24 months). The safety profile of T-DXd was similar as that previously reported; with an additional 9 mo follow-up, only 3 new cases of T-DXd-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) were reported. Results are summarized in the table below. Conclusion Consistent with prior results, T-DXd demonstrated high rates of durable responses in a heavily pretreated population of patients with MBC. From this single-arm, phase 2 study, the PFS and immature OS results are encouraging; these endpoints will be further evaluated in the ongoing randomized controlled studies of T-DXd. For patients who remained on treatment for this longer duration (double that of the previous report), the rate of discontinuation or ILD did not notably increase. Continued attention to pulmonary symptoms and careful monitoring is warranted. Updated Results for DESTINY-Breast011 Aug 2019 datacut8 Jun 2020 datacutPatients remaining on treatment, n/N (%)79/184 (42.9%)37/184 (20.1%)Median duration of follow-up11.1 months20.5 monthsORR60.9%61.4%CR6.0%6.5%PR54.9%54.9%SD36.4%35.9%Duration of response, median (95% CI)14.8 months (13.8-16.9)20.8 months (15.0-NE)PFS, median (95% CI)16.4 months (12.7-NE)19.4 months (14.1-NE)OSMedian (95% CI)NE (NE-NE)24.6 months (23.1-NE)Point estimate at 12 mo (95% CI)86.2% (79.8-90.7)85% (79-90)Point estimate at 18 mo (95% CI)–74% (67-80)SafetyPatients with a TEAE, n (%)183 (99.5%)183 (99.5%)Grade ≥3105 (57.1%)113 (61.4%)Associated with discontinuation28 (15.2%)34 (18.5%)Associated with death10 (5.4%)10 (5.4%)Drug-related ILD per ILD adjudication committeea25 (13.6%)28 (15.2%)Grade 5 drug-related ILD per ILD adjudication committee4 (2.2%)5 (2.7%)a1 grade 1 and 1 grade 3 event are pending adjudication and are not included. Citation Format: Shanu Modi, Cristina Saura, Toshinari Yamashita, Yeon Hee Park, Sung-Bae Kim, Kenji Tamura, Fabrice Andre, Hiroji Iwata, Yoshinori Ito, Junji Tsurutani, Joohyuk Sohn, Neelima Denduluri, Christophe Perrin, Kenjiro Aogi, Eriko Tokunaga, Seock-Ah Im, Keun Seok Lee, Sara A Hurvitz, Javier Cortes, Caleb Lee, Yali Liu, Lin Zhang, Javad Shahidi, Antoine Yver, Jose Baselga, Ian E Krop. Updated results from DESTINY-breast01, a phase 2 trial of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd ) in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-06.

Introduction Adding pertuzumab(P) on trastuzumab(H) with cytotoxic chemotherapy increased pathologic complete response (pCR) of early or locally advanced HER2 positive breast cancer (EBC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Since 63.6% of pCR rate has been reported from TRYPHAENA trial, TCHP regimen has been used as a standard of neoadjuvant treatment regimen for patients with HER2 positive EBC. However, this regimen has profound toxicities in terms of myelosuppression, neurotoxicity, and etc. Furthermore we still need more information on clinical outcomes and toxicities with this regimen. Therefore, we report real world experience of EBC patients treated with neoadjuvant TCHP followed by curative surgery. Methods We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical record of EBC patients who received neoadjuvant TCHP. Information which we gathered included patients’ and tumor characteristics at the time of diagnosis, details of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathologic assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant TCHP and recurrence free survival after curative surgery. pCR was defined as absence of residual invasive cancer on pathologic evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes (ypT0/isN0). Results Between February 2016 and August 2019, 447 patients were treated with neoadjuvant TCHP followed by curative surgery. Median age at BC diagnosis was 56. In clinical stage, stage II was 54.6% and 45.4% of stage III and hormone receptor (HR) positive BC was 48.3%. Most commonly reported adverse event(AE) was mucositis (84%) followed by diarrhea (77%). In terms of Grade 3 AE, anorexia(6%), diarrhea(2%) were frequently observed and 9(2%) of febrile neutropenia occurred despite of prophylactic use of peg-filgrastim. Forty percent of patients experienced dose reduction due to AEs. Of 447 patients, 29% of patients underwent total mastectomy and 71% of breast conserving surgery. In terms of clinical outcome, pCR rate was 64%; 77% of HR negative BCs and 50% of HR positive BCs. Among baseline characteristics, high nuclear grade, high histologic grade, HR stats affected to pCR status (Ps Key words: neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HER2+ breast cancer, pertuzumab, pathologic complete response Citation Format: Ji-Yeon Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jonghan Yu, Byung Joo Chae, Se Kyung Lee, Jai Min Ryu, Jin Seok Ahn, Young-Hyuck Im, Yeon Hee Park. Real Would Evidence (RWE) of neoadjuvant docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (TCHP) in patients with HER2 positive early or locally advanced breast cancer treated Single institutional experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-38.

Background: Young-PEARL study showed median progression-free survival (PFS) of 20·1 months in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group versus 14·4 months in the capecitabine group (hazard ratio 0·659 [95% CI 0·437-0·994], log-rank p=0·0235). We conducted exploratory biomarker analysis to predict the efficacy of the trial. Methods: This was a phase II trial that randomized 184 patients with HR+ MBC in premenopausal women to palbociclib plus exemestane with GNRH agonist (Arm A, n=79) versus capecitabine (Arm B, n=62). We performed targeted sequencing (CancerSCANTM) containing 375 cancer-related genes (141 patients) and whole transcriptome sequencing (165 patients) using baseline tumor samples to examine genomic alteration in relation to drug response in terms of PFS. Result: By research-based PAM50 subtyping, 73% of patients classified as Luminal (Luminal A and Luminal B), and showed better prognosis in all patients and Arm A (p Conclusions: The alteration of a few genes including Rb1 loss may be associated with resistance of palbociclib in HR-positive premenopausal population with MBC. Luminal type showed better prognosis, and BRCA2 pathogenic mutation showed worse prognosis regardless luminal/non-luminal type. ESR1 mutation was found in low population frequency because all patients didn’t received AI therapy. Further exploration of molecular variables is warranted to determine and validate biomarkers of efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT02592746. Citation Format: Kyunghee Park, Gun Min Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Seok Yun Kang, In Hae Park, Jee Hyun Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Woong-Yang Park, Seock-Ah Im, Yeon Hee Park. Exploratory biomarker analysis of Young-PEARL [palbociclib plus exemestane with GnRH agonist versus capecitabine in premenopausal women with HR (hormone receptor)-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC)] study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-19.

Background: In the PAKT study, addition of the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib to 1st-line paclitaxel therapy for metastatic TNBC resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint; Schmid, J Clin Oncol 2020). The stratified PFS hazard ratio was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.50-1.08; one-sided P=0.06; predefined significance level of 0.10, one-sided; median PFS 5.9 vs 4.2 months with capivasertib vs placebo). Overall survival (OS) results were immature at the primary analysis with 53% of events but suggested long OS with capivasertib (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37-0.99; two-sided P=0.04). Here we report final results. Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase II trial, recruited women with untreated, metastatic TNBC. Total of 140 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to paclitaxel 90mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15) with either capivasertib (400mg twice daily) or placebo (days 2-5, 9-12, 16-19) every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included OS in the ITT population and in patients with and without PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-alterations. Results: With a median F/U of 40.0 months, median OS was longer in the capivasertib arm (19.1 vs 13.5 months, stratified HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.47-1.05, p=0.085). In contrast to the earlier analysis, no meaningful differences were seen in terms of benefit with capivasertib between patients with or without alterations of PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN. Median OS numerically favoured capivasertib vs placebo both in the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered (stratified HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.21-1.58, p=0.290) and PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN non-altered subgroup (stratified HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.47-1.18, p=0.207). The safety profile of capivasertib plus paclitaxel was unchanged. Conclusions: Final OS results show a numerical trend favouring capivasertib; effects were observed regardless of PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations. Consistent with the previously observed PFS benefit, these findings support further evaluation of first-line Capivasertib plus paclitaxel for metastatic TNBC in the ongoing Capitello290 randomised phase III trial in patients with and without PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations. Citation Format: Peter Schmid, Jacinta Abraham, Stephen Chan, Adrian Murray Brunt, Gia Nemsadze, Richard D Baird, Yeon Hee Park, Peter Hall, Timothy Perren, Robert C Stein, László Mangel, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Melissa Phillips, John Conibear, Javier Cortes, Andrew Foxley, Elza de Bruin, Robert McEwen, Myria Nikolaou, Daniel Stetson, Brian Dougherty, Aaron Prendergast, Max McLaughlin-Callan, Matthew Burgess, Cheryl Lawrence, Hayley Cartwright, Kelly Mousa, Nicholas Turner, Duncan Wheatley. Mature survival update of the double-blind placebo-controlled randomised phase II PAKT trial of first-line capivasertib plus paclitaxel for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-11.

Background: Prognosis of patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been revolutionized with the development of dual antibodies targeting HER-2 and antibody-drug conjugate, but resistance to anti-HER-2 therapy is inevitable ultimately. PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway aberration is known to be one of the resistance mechanisms. This randomized phase 2 pilot study evaluated safety and efficacy of Herzuma® (trastuzumab biosimilar) plus Gedatolisib (dual PI3K/mTORC inhibitor) in patients with HER-2 positive MBC who progressed after multiple lines of therapy. Methods: Patients with HER-2 positive MBC with known PIK3CA pathologic mutation or amplification whose disease progressed after more than two HER-2 directed therapy were enrolled in the study. They received Herzuma® (8mg/kg IV for 1st cycle loading dose, and then 6mg/kg IV every 3 weeks) plus Gedatolisib (180mg on D1, 8, 15 of every 21 days). We evaluated efficacy of the combination treatment as interim analysis. The data cutoff of this interim analysis was Aug 4, 2020. Results: As a pilot study, 15 patients were enrolled and followed for a median of 2.3 months. At data cutoff, 11 patients were eligible for response assessment. All patients were confirmed to have pathologic PIK3CA aberrations: H1047R, H1047L, E542Q, E542K, E453K, N345K, and PIK3CA amplification. Five patients reached partial response (PR) as their best response, three were stable disease (SD), and three had progressive disease (PD). All patients who have reached PR remain on investigational treatment at the data cutoff point, and the longest one is on treatment for 7.8 months. One of the SD patients ended treatment due to disease progression, and the other two have been undergoing treatment. Overall, response rate was 45.5% and disease control rate was 72.7%. No fatal adverse events related to trial medication were reported. Conclusion: In this phase 2 pilot study, Trastuzumab biosimilar plus Gedatolisib presented 45.5% of response rate with manageable toxicity in patients with HER-2 positive MBC with PIK3CA aberration. Clinical trial information: NCT03698383 Acknowledgement: this research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health &Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant number: HI17C2206). Citation Format: Ju Won Kim, Hee Kyung Ahn, Jong Gwon Choi, Yee Soo Chae, Gyeong Won Lee, Keon Uk Park, Eun Mi Lee, Sung Hoon Sim, Jee Hyun Kim, Yeon Hee Park, Mi So Kim, Jin Hyun Park, Jeong Eun Kim, Han Jo Kim, Mi Sun Ahn, So Yeon Oh, Min Hwan Kim, Su-Jin Koh, Kyoung Eun Lee, Myoung Joo Kang, Jae Ho Byun, Joo young Ha, Jung Hye Kwon, Joo Young Jung, Su Ee Lee, In Hae Park, Kyong Hwa Park. Phase II pilot study of trastuzumab biosimilar (herzuma®) plus gedatolisib in patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer who progressed after 2 or more HER-2 directed chemotherapy [KM-10A/KCSG18-13 interim analysis] [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-39.

DESTINY-Breast01 (NCT03248492) evaluated trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201) in patients with heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We present a subgroup of 24 patients with a history of treated brain metastases (BM), a population with limited treatment options. In patients with BMs, the confirmed objective response rate (cORR) was 58.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 36.6%–77.9%], and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 18.1 months (95% CI, 6.7–18.1 months). In patients without BMs (n = 160), cORR was 61.3% and mPFS was 16.4 months. Eight patients (47.1%) experienced a best overall intracranial response of partial response or complete response. Seven patients (41.2%) had a best percentage change in brain lesion diameter from baseline consistent with stable disease. Two patients (8.3%) with BMs and two (1.3%) without BMs experienced progression in the brain. The safety profile of T-DXd was consistent with previous studies. The durable clinical activity of T-DXd in this population warrants further investigation. Significance: Advances in treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer have greatly improved patient outcomes, but intracranial progression remains an important risk for which few therapeutic options are currently available. T-DXd demonstrated durable efficacy in patients with stable, treated BMs. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2711

Purpose: This study reports the MTD, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and preliminary efficacy of alpelisib or buparlisib used in combination with tamoxifen plus goserelin in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients and Methods: This study enrolled premenopausal women with HR+, HER2− ABC. Patients received tamoxifen (20 mg once daily) and goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 28 days) with either alpelisib (350 mg once daily; n = 16) or buparlisib (100 mg once daily; n = 13) in 28-day cycles until MTD was observed. Results: The criteria for MTD were not met for both alpelisib and buparlisib. The RP2D of alpelisib and buparlisib in combination with tamoxifen and goserelin were 350 mg and 100 mg, respectively. Both combinations met protocol-specified criteria for tolerability. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were hypokalemia (12.5%), hyperglycemia (6.3%), and rash (6.3%) for alpelisib and alanine aminotransferase increase (30.8%), aspartate aminotransferase increase (23.1%), and anxiety (15.4%) for buparlisib. TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 18.8% and 53.8% of alpelisib- and buparlisib-treated patients, respectively. Progression-free survival was 25.2 months in the alpelisib group and 20.6 months in the buparlisib group. Conclusions: The RP2Ds of alpelisib and buparlisib were 350 mg and 100 mg, respectively. No unexpected safety findings were reported. Although an early-phase study, data suggest that alpelisib plus endocrine therapy may be a potentially efficacious treatment that warrants further evaluation for premenopausal patients with HR+, HER2− ABC. See related commentary by Clark et al., p. 371

To identify the risk factors leading to new brain metastases (BM) following brain-directed treatment for initial BM resulting from breast cancer (BC). In this multi-institutional study, 538 BC patients with available follow-up imaging after brain-directed treatment for initial BM were analyzed. Tumor molecular subtypes were classified as follows: hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2−, n = 136), HER2-positive (HER2+, n = 253), or triple-negative BC (TNBC, n = 149). In 37.4% of patients, new BM emerged at a median of 10.5 months after brain-directed treatment for initial BM. The 1-year actuarial rate of new BM for HR+/HER2−, HER2+, and TNBC were 51.9%, 44.0%, and 69.6%, respectively (p = 0.008). Initial whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) reduced new BM rates (22.5% reduction at 1 year, p 4) (p

Purpose YoungPEARL (KCSG-BR15-10) trial demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for premenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR+/HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) for palbociclib plus exemestane with ovarian function suppression compared to capecitabine. However, the number of tamoxifen-sensitive premenopausal patients was small because most recurrences occurred early during adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), with tamoxifen being the only drug used; hence, the data for these patients were limited. Here we present a subgroup analysis according to tamoxifen sensitivity from the YoungPEARL study. Materials and Methods Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive palbociclib+ET (oral exemestane 25 mg/day for 28 days, palbociclib 125 mg/day for 21 days, plus leuprolide 3.75 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks) or chemotherapy (oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks). Tamoxifen resistance was defined as: relapse while on adjuvant tamoxifen, relapse within 12 months of completing adjuvant tamoxifen, or progression while on first-line tamoxifen within 6 months for MBC.Results In total, 184 patients were randomized and 178 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. PFS improvement in the palbociclib+ET group was observed in tamoxifen-sensitive patients (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 1.19). Furthermore, palbociclib+ET prolonged median PFS compared with capecitabine in tamoxifen-sensitive (20.5 months vs. 12.6 months) and tamoxifen-resistant (20.1 months vs. 14.5 months) patients. Palbociclib+ET demonstrated a higher rate of objective response, disease control, and clinical benefit in tamoxifen-sensitive patients. Conclusion This post hoc exploratory analysis suggests that palbociclib+ET is a promising therapeutic option for premenopausal HR+/HER2– MBC patients irrespective of tamoxifen sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors combined with immunotherapy have shown antitumour activity in preclinical studies. We aimed to assess the safety and activity of olaparib in combination with the PD-L1-inhibitor, durvalumab, in patients with germline BRCA1-mutated or BRCA2-mutated metastatic breast cancer.METHODS: The MEDIOLA trial is a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2, basket trial of durvalumab and olaparib in solid tumours. Patients were enrolled into four initial cohorts: germline BRCA-mutated, metastatic breast cancer; germline BRCA-mutated, metastatic ovarian cancer; metastatic gastric cancer; and relapsed small-cell lung cancer. Here, we report on the cohort of patients with breast cancer. Patients who were aged 18 years or older (or aged 19 years or older in South Korea) with germline BRCA1-mutated or BRCA2-mutated or both and histologically confirmed, progressive, HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer were enrolled from 14 health centres in the UK, the USA, Israel, France, Switzerland, and South Korea. Patients should not have received more than two previous lines of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Patients received 300 mg olaparib in tablet form orally twice daily for 4 weeks and thereafter a combination of olaparib 300 mg twice daily and durvalumab 1·5 g via intravenous infusion every 4 weeks until disease progression. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, and 12-week disease control rate. Safety was analysed in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, and activity analyses were done in the full-analysis set (patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and were not excluded from the study). Recruitment has completed and the study is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02734004.FINDINGS: Between June 14, 2016, and May 2, 2017, 34 patients were enrolled and received both study drugs and were included in the safety analysis. 11 (32%) patients experienced grade 3 or worse adverse events, of which the most common were anaemia (four [12%]), neutropenia (three [9%]), and pancreatitis (two [6%]). Three (9%) patients discontinued due to adverse events and four (12%) patients experienced a total of six serious adverse events. There were no treatment-related deaths. 24 (80%; 90% CI 64·3-90·9) of 30 patients eligible for activity analysis had disease control at 12 weeks.INTERPRETATION: Combination of olaparib and durvalumab showed promising antitumour activity and safety similar to that previously observed in olaparib and durvalumab monotherapy studies. Further research in a randomised setting is needed to determine predictors of therapeutic benefit and whether addition of durvalumab improves long-term clinical outcomes compared with olaparib monotherapy.FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

We explored clinical implication of intrinsic molecular subtype in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) + metastatic breast cancer (BC) with pan-HER inhibitor from a phase II clinical trial of poziotinib in refractory HER2+BC patients. For this translational research correlated with phase II clinical trial, we performed an nCounter expression assay, using gene panel including 50 genes for PAM50 prediction and targeted deep sequencing. From 106 participants, we obtained 97 tumor tissues and analyzed gene expression in 91 of these samples. Of 91 HER2+BCs, 40 (44.0%) were HER2-enriched (E) intrinsic molecular subtype, 17 (18.7%) of Luminal A, 16 (17.6%) of Basal-like, 14 (15.4%) of Luminal B and 4 (4.4%) of Normal-like. HER2-E subtype was associated with hormone receptor negativity (odds ratio [OR] 2.93; p = 0.019), 3 + of HER2 immunohistochemistry(IHC) (OR 5.64; p = 0.001), high mRNA expression of HER2 (OR 14.43; p = 0.001) and copy number(CN) amplification of HER2 (OR 12.80; p = 0.005). In genetic alterations, alteration was more frequently observed in HER2-E subtype (OR 3.84; p = 0.022) but there was no association between PIK3CA alteration and HER2-E subtype (p = 0.655). In terms of drug efficacy, high mRNA expression of HER2 was the most powerful predictor of poziotinib response (median progression-free survival [PFS): 4.63 months [high] vs. 2.56 [low]; p