Search

Background The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) correlates with patient survival in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but optimal evaluation of the treatment response based on PET-CT parameters has not been established. Methods We analysed 226 OSCC patients who underwent PET-CT before and after NACT followed by surgery. We assessed SUVmax, metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) for the primary tumour and the number of PET-positive lymph nodes before and after NACT to predict patient survival. Results In a stepwise analysis, we defined 60%, 80%, and 80% as the optimal cut-off values for SUVmax, MTV, and TLG reduction, respectively, to distinguish responders and non-responders to NACT. In the ROC analysis, the TLG reduction rate was the best predictor of recurrence among PET-CT parameters. The TLG responders achieved significantly more favourable prognoses than non-responders (2-year progression-free survival [PFS] rate: 64.1% vs. 38.5%; P = 0.0001). TLG reduction rate (HR 2.58; 95% CI 1.16–5.73) and the number of PET-positive lymph nodes after NACT (HR 1.79; 95% CI 1.04–3.08) were significant independent prognostic factors. Conclusions TLG reduction is the best predictor of prognosis. Preoperative PET-CT evaluation of both the primary tumour and lymph nodes could accurately stratify risk in OSCC patients.

The BRAF V600E mutation accounts for approximately 5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and is an extremely poor prognostic factor. However, there are no clear recommendations regarding first-line therapy for patients with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. Recently, a novel combination of encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab, showed a higher response rate than standard chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC. Here we describe our plan for the TRESBIEN study (OGSG 2101), which is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II study designed to evaluate whether encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab are effective for patients with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer, during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. The planned number of subjects is 25.

Preoperative risk assessment is important in older patients because they often have comorbidities and impaired organ function. We performed preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for older patients with esophageal cancer.A total of 217 patients over 75 years old who underwent esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer were analyzed. The CGA was performed preoperatively and included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Score (GDS), vitality index, Barthel index, and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). We defined the robust group as patients with normal function on every instrument, and the pre-frail and frail groups as those with functional impairment on one instrument or two or more instruments, respectively. We assessed how the CGA correlated with postoperative complications and prognosis.Of the 217 patients, 86 (39.6%) were in the robust group, 68 (31.3%) in the pre-frail group, and 63 (29.0%) in the frail group. Postoperative pneumonia (P = 0.026) and anastomotic leakage (P = 0.032) were significantly more common in the frail group. The frail group had a significantly longer postoperative hospitalization period (P = 0.016) and significantly lower rate of discharge to home (P = 0.016). Overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in the frail group (5-year overall survival rate, frail group versus others, 37.8% versus 52.0%, P = 0.046), but it was not significant on multivariate analysis.The preoperative CGA in older patients with esophageal cancer was associated with risk of postoperative complications.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment. Since clinical benefits are limited to a subset of patients, we aimed to identify peripheral blood biomarkers that predict the efficacy of the anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody (nivolumab) in patients with gastric cancer.We collected peripheral blood samples from gastric cancer patients (n = 29) before and after treatment with nivolumab and investigated the relationship between the frequency of surface or intracellular markers among nivolumab-binding PD-1Patients with a high frequency of CD103 among PD-1A high frequency of CD103 among PD-1

Background Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) are ectopic lymphoid aggregates in non-lymphoid tissues, which are associated with improved prognosis in some cancer types. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of TLSs in oesophageal cancer (EC). Methods In a series of 316 EC surgical specimens from two different institutes, we evaluated the density and maturity of peritumoral TLSs using haematoxylin/eosin, immunohistochemistry, and multiplex immunofluorescence staining. We analysed the association between TLSs and clinicopathological parameters. The clinical significance of TLSs was further evaluated in a different cohort of 34 patients with recurrent EC treated with anti-PD-1 antibody. Results Tumours with high TLS density predominantly consisted of matured TLSs. High TLS density was significantly associated with less advanced tumour stage, absence of lymphatic/vascular invasion, better serum nutrition parameters (neutrophils count, albumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and prognostic nutritional index), and prolonged survival. This survival trend was more remarkable in cases with matured TLSs, which represented an increased population of CD138+ plasma cells. In the second EC cohort, TLS density predicted the clinical response to anti-PD-1 antibody and patient survival. Conclusion The density and maturity of peritumoral TLSs are useful parameters for predicting long-term survival and response to anti-PD-1 antibody treatment in EC patients.

Several studies have reported a high incidence of metastasis to para-aortic station 16a2lat (no. 16a2lat) among patients with esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer. However, the risk factors for no. 16a2lat metastasis are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the risk factors for no. 16a2lat metastasis in patients with EGJ cancer.Among 371 prospectively enrolled patients with EGJ cancer, 344 patients who underwent no. 16a2lat lymph node dissection were analyzed. Background factors were compared between the patients with and those without no. 16a2lat metastasis. The association between the histologic status of 10 regional lymph node stations and that of no. 16a2lat metastasis was evaluated.Among the background factors, clinical N2-3 was the only independent risk factor for no. 16a2lat metastasis (odds ratio [OR], 5.90; p = 0.003). The metastasis rate of no. 16a2lat was 11.8% (11/93) for the patients with cN2-3 disease and 2.0% (5/251) for those with cN0-1 disease. The multivariate analysis showed that nos. 2 and 7 metastases were independent risk factors for no. 16a2lat metastasis, with respective ORs of 5.53 (p = 0.018) and 4.00 (p = 0.041). The patients with neither station no. 2 nor no. 7 metastasis did not exhibit no. 16a2lat metastasis, whereas the rate of no. 16a2lat metastasis was 23.7% for the patients with metastases of both stations.Clinical N2-3 and histologic positivity of station nos. 2 and 7 were independent risk factors for no. 16a2lat metastasis. These findings could potentially assist in determining the indication for no. 16a2lat dissection for patients with EGJ cancer.

Background Real-world evidence on the preference for and effectiveness of third- or later-line (3L +) monotherapy for HER2-positive gastric cancer is limited in Japan. This study evaluated the utility of nivolumab, irinotecan, and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) monotherapy as 3L + treatment in Japanese patients with HER2-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer who were previously treated with trastuzumab. Methods In this multicenter, retrospective, observational study (20 centers), data of eligible patients were extracted from medical records (September 22, 2017–March 31, 2020), with follow-up until June 30, 2020. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]), and disease control rate (DCR). Results Of 127 enrolled patients, the overall analysis population comprised 117 patients (median [range] age, 71 [38–89] years). The most commonly prescribed 3L + monotherapy was nivolumab (n = 100), followed by irinotecan (n = 12) and FTD/TPI (n = 5). The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS, rwPFS, and TTF were 6.2 (4.5–8.0), 1.9 (1.5–2.3), and 1.8 (1.5–2.2) months, respectively, at median (range) 150 (25–1007) days of follow-up. The ORR (CR + PR) and DCR were 9.0% (1% + 8%) and 32.0%, respectively. Factors such as higher neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (≥ 2.54), Glasgow prognostic score (≥ 1), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS; ≥ 2), and hepatic metastasis significantly impacted OS. Conclusions The observed OS in this study for HER2-positive G/GEJ cancer was shorter than that reported previously, suggesting that the effectiveness of nivolumab, irinotecan, or FTD/TPI as 3L + therapy may be limited.

Regorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that has been established as third-line treatment for patients after the failure of imatinib and sunitinib. However, since clinical data of regorafenib in the Japanese population are still lacking, the management of regorafenib is mainly based on the clinical experience of each oncologist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in a Japanese population.Thirty-three patients treated with regorafenib for metastatic and recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors were retrospectively enrolled. This study investigated the anti-tumor effect, including overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety, which was evaluated based on the incidence of adverse events.The median overall survival of patients treated with regorafenib was 23.8 months and the 1-year overall survival rate was 80.0%, the median progression-free survival was 7.1 months and the 1-year progression-free survival rate was 40.2%. The responses to regorafenib were partial response in 3 cases (9.1%), stable disease in 17 (51.5%), progressive disease in 10 (30.3%), and non-evaluable in 3 (9.1%). The disease control rate was 54.0%. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in all patients, with the most common being hand-foot syndrome (72.7%), followed by liver damage (36.4%) and diarrhea (27.3%), and six patients (20.0%) were discontinued due to adverse events.This is the first report of Japanese patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with regorafenib. Regorafenib showed efficacy and a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors, which was comparable with previous studies.

Esophagogastric junction cancer is defined as adenocarcinoma with the epicenter within 5 cm of the esophagogastric junction in the West according to the Siewert classification. In contrast, it is defined as cancer of any histological type with the epicenter located within 2 cm proximal or distal to the esophagogastric junction in Japan according to the Nishi classification. Recently, the incidence of esophagogastric junction cancer has been rapidly rising all over the world, leading to much attention. Esophagogastric junction cancer was previously treated like gastric cancer or esophageal cancer because it is a less frequently occurring tumor. Esophagogastric junction cancer is considered to have worse prognosis than gastric cancer. Therefore, in recent years, esophagogastric junction cancer has been recognized as an independent malignant disease with poor prognosis, and thus development of treatment strategies focused on esophagogastric junction cancer is needed. The mapping of frequent metastasis in the mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes has revealed the lymphatic flow from esophagogastric junction cancer specifically, establishing the optimal lymph node dissection area and surgical approach. The development of multimodal treatment that includes chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy has been applied to improve the survival of esophagogastric junction cancer. In this review, we summarize clinical trials with important evidence on surgical and multimodal perioperative treatments for esophagogastric junction cancer.

Ghrelin has been reported to reduce postoperative weight loss by improving appetite and food intake in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery.We aimed to investigate whether growth hormone induction, another essential effect of ghrelin, may attenuate skeletal muscle loss in patients during postoperative starvation.Esophageal cancer patients were randomized to receive a continuous intravenous infusion of high-dose ghrelin (HD; 0.5 µg/kg/h), low-dose ghrelin (LD; 0.25 µg/kg/h), or placebo for 7 days after surgery. During this period, oral feeding was not introduced but the patients received the same parenteral and enteral nutrition. We investigated the effects of ghrelin on body weight, skeletal muscle mass, nutritional status, and hormone levels.Overall, 73 patients were enrolled in this study. The rate of weight loss on postoperative day (POD) 7 relative to that before surgery was significantly lower in the HD group than in the placebo group (HD vs. placebo: -0.61% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.030). The rate of muscle loss in the erector spinae muscle on POD 7 in the HD and LD groups was significantly lower than that in the placebo group (HD vs. placebo: 2.8% vs. 8.5%, p 0.001; LD vs. placebo: 4.9% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.028). The levels of growth hormone on PODs 1, 3, and 7, and insulin-like growth factor 1 on PODs 3, 7, and 14 were significantly higher in patients who received ghrelin.Continuous ghrelin administration could attenuate skeletal muscle loss in esophageal cancer patients during postoperative starvation.

Recent retrospective studies have shown that increased intraoperative blood loss (IBL) during curative gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer is a negative prognostic indicator for recurrence. However, there are no reliable reports assessing this with a large-scale prospective cohort. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of IBL on long-term outcomes using data from the JCOG1001 phase III trial, which was designed to determine if bursectomy led to improved survival vs. nonbursectomy in patients with cT3/4a gastric cancer. This study included 1203 of the 1204 patients enrolled in the JCOG1001. From the tertiles of IBL (196 ml, 400 ml), we divided the patients into three groups: IBL

Background Mutations in p53, identified in 90% of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), are associated with unfavourable prognosis and chemo-resistance. APR-246 induces apoptosis by restoring transcriptional ability of mutant p53, and may be a promising therapeutic agent to overcome chemo-resistance in ESCC. Methods In ESCC cell lines differing in p53 status, we performed in vitro cell viability and apoptosis assays, evaluated reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and assessed signal changes by western blot after APR-246 administration with/without chemo-agent. Antitumour effects and signal changes were evaluated in in vivo experiments using xenograft and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models. Results APR-246 administration induced significant apoptosis by upregulating p73 and Noxa via ROS induction in ESCC cell lines harbouring p53 missense mutations. Moreover, APR-246 plus chemotherapy exerted combined antitumour effects in ESCC with p53 missense mutations. This effect was also mediated through enhanced ROS activity, leading to massive apoptosis via upregulation of p73 and Noxa. These findings were confirmed by xenograft and PDX models with p53 mutant ESCC. Conclusion APR-246 strongly induced apoptosis by inducing ROS activity and p73-Noxa signalling, specifically in ESCC with p53 missense mutation. This antitumour effect was further enhanced by combination with 5-FU, which we first confirmed in ESCC preclinical model.

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancers are resected thorough esophagectomy or gastrectomy, with the incidence of postoperative complications influenced by the chosen procedure. In this prospective nationwide multicenter study, patients with cT2–T4 EGJ cancers were enrolled before surgery. Based on the protocol, surgeons performed a transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) or a transhiatal gastrectomy (THG) and dissected all lymph nodes prespecified as the standardized procedure. Postoperative complications were correlated with the clinical factors in each procedure. A total of 345 patients were eligible for this study. TTE and THG were performed in 120 and 225 patients, respectively. Complications of Clavien-Dindo ≥ Grade II were found in 115/345 (33.3%) patients. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was found only in the TTE group (p

To compare irinotecan-alone, paclitaxel-alone, and each combination chemotherapy with S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) that is refractory to S-1 or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP). Patients with AGC after first-line chemotherapy with S-1 or SP, or patients during adjuvant chemotherapy or within 26 weeks after adjuvant chemotherapy completion with S-1 with confirmed disease progression were eligible. Patients were randomly divided into four groups based on treatment: irinotecan-alone (irinotecan; 150 mg/m2, day 1, q14 days), paclitaxel-alone (paclitaxel; 80 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15, q28 days), S-1 plus irinotecan (irinotecan; 80 mg/m2, days 1, 15, S-1; 80 mg/m2, days 1–21, q35 days), and S-1 plus paclitaxel (paclitaxel; 50 mg/m2, day1, 8, S-1; 80 mg/m2, days 1–14, q21 days). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and safety. From July 2008 to March 2012, 127 patients were enrolled. No difference in median OS was observed in the irinotecan vs. paclitaxel groups or in the monotherapy groups vs. the S-1 combination therapy groups. Median PFS was longer in the paclitaxel group compared with the irinotecan group (4.1 vs. 3.6 months, p = 0.035), although no difference was observed when comparing monotherapy vs. S-1 combination. The most common grade 3 to 4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia with no difference in incidence rate across the treatment groups. There was no difference in OS between irinotecan and paclitaxel no in OS prolongation of S-1 combination therapy in second-line chemotherapy.

Background Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the deadliest of all human squamous cell carcinomas and is characterized by chemotherapy resistance and poor prognosis associated with the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). A subset of ESCC displays loss‐of‐function mutations in genes encoding Notch receptor family members, including NOTCH3. Although Notch signaling regulates EMT in ESCC cells, the role of NOTCH3 in EMT and chemotherapy resistance remains elusive. This study aimed to examine the role of NOTCH3 in EMT and chemotherapy resistance, and determine whether NOTCH3 expression can be used to predict the response to chemotherapy. Methods In vitro and in vivo assays were conducted to clarify the contribution of NOTCH3 to chemotherapy resistance. Using specimens from 120 ESCC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we compared the expression levels of NOTCH3 and genes involved in EMT according to the degree of chemotherapy sensitivity. Results In ESCC cells, chemotherapy resistance was associated with NOTCH3 downregulation and concurrent activation of EMT. RNA interference to silence NOTCH3 resulted in induction of the EMT marker Vimentin (VIM), leading to chemotherapy resistance in ESCC cells. Conversely, ectopic expression of the activated form of NOTCH3 suppressed EMT and sensitized cells to chemotherapy. Results of chromatin immunoprecipitation assays suggested that NOTCH3 may repress transcription of the VIM. Conclusions Our findings suggest that NOTCH3 may control chemotherapy sensitivity by regulating EMT. NOTCH3 may serve as a novel biomarker to predict better clinical outcomes in ESCC patients., Notch3 may control chemotherapy sensitivity by regulating the epithelial‐mesenchymal transition. Notch3 may predict better clinical outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Background We previously reported the response rate of a phase II OGSG1602 study on panitumumab in chemotherapy-naive frail or elderly patients with RAS wild-type unresectable colorectal cancer (CRC) [Terazawa T, Kato T, Goto M, et al. Oncologist. 2021;26(1):17]. Herein, we report a survival analysis. Methods Patients aged ≥65 years and considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy or aged ≥76 years were enrolled. Primary tumors located from the cecum to the transverse colon were considered right-sided tumors (RSTs); those located from the splenic flexure to the rectum were considered left-sided tumors (LSTs). Results Among the 36 enrolled patients, 34 were included in the efficacy analysis, with 26 and 8 having LSTs and RSTs, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.0 [95% CI, 5.4-10.0] and 17.5 months (95% CI, 13.8-24.3), respectively. Although no significant differences existed in PFS between patients with LST and RST {6.6 (95% CI, 5.4-11.5) vs. 4.9 months [95% CI, 1.9-not available (NA), P = .120]}, there were significant differences in OS [19.3 (95% CI, 14.2-NA) vs.12.3 months (95% CI, 9.9-NA), P = .043]. Conclusion Panitumumab showed favorable OS in frail or elderly patients with RAS wild-type CRC and no prior exposure to chemotherapy. Panitumumab may be optimal for patients with LSTs (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry Number UMIN000024528).

Peritoneal, lymph node, and hematogenous recurrence patterns are common after potentially curative surgery for gastric cancer. However, clinicopathological characteristics associated with each recurrence type have rarely been comprehensively reported among patients who received a unified treatment strategy and follow-up protocol. Understanding these recurrence patterns would help with early detection of recurrence and a personalized follow-up plan. We investigated the initial recurrence patterns after curative gastrectomy using data from the randomized clinical JCOG1001 trial.Of 1204 patients enrolled in JCOG1001, 932 pStage II/III patients were included. Initial recurrence dates and patterns were recorded by attending physicians according to the protocol. Risk factors for hematogenous, lymph node, and peritoneal recurrence were determined by univariable and multivariable analyses using the Fine-Gray model.Overall, 253 patients developed recurrence. Hematogenous recurrence was the most frequent pattern (n = 115), followed by peritoneal (n = 104) and lymph node recurrence (n = 70). Differentiated type (p = 0.0028), pT4 (p = 0.0466), and pN3 (p 0.0001) were associated with hematogenous recurrence; however, D2+ lymphadenectomy reduced it (p = 0.0161). Patients with large (≥5 cm) tumors (p = 0.0312), pT4 (p 0.0001), pN3 (p = 0.0013), and undifferentiated histologic type (p = 0.0001) had significantly higher rates of peritoneal recurrence. Extended lymph node metastasis (pN3) was the only risk factor (p 0.0001) for lymph node recurrence.Clinicopathological features differed according to the recurrence patterns. Vigilant follow-up with an understanding of recurrence patterns might be beneficial for some high-risk patients.

This phase I study was designed to: (1) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor futibatinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors, and (2) examine the antitumor activity of the RD in patients with gastric cancer (GC) or other advanced solid tumors who have FGFR or FGF/FGFR abnormalities, respectively. In the dose-escalation phase, patients were assigned to 21-day cycles of oral futibatinib 8-160 mg three times a week (TIW) or 16 or 20 mg once daily (QD). In the expansion phase, patients received oral futibatinib 56, 80, or 120 mg TIW, or 16 or 20 mg QD. Eighty-three patients received futibatinib TIW (n = 40) or QD (n = 43). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed according to the final study protocol definition, and the MTD was not reached. The most common adverse events with both regimens were hyperphosphatemia (TIW, 82.5%; QD, 100.0%) and decreased appetite (TIW, 40.0%; QD, 58.1%). Hyperphosphatemia was asymptomatic, not leading to futibatinib discontinuation. The overall response rate (ORR) was 11.5% in patients with FGF/FGFR abnormalities. Notably, in GC patients harboring FGFR2 copy number (CN) ≥10, the ORR was 36.4% versus 0 in patients with CN10. Therefore, futibatinib had a generally predictable and manageable safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumors. Antitumor activity was seen in patients with FGF/FGFR abnormalities, particularly those with GC and high FGFR2 CNs. Thus, futibatinib 20 mg QD was chosen as the RD for phase II studies.

Despite improvements in gastric cancer treatment, the mortality associated with advanced gastric cancer is still high. The activation of β-adrenergic receptors by stress has been shown to accelerate the progression of several cancers. Accordingly, increasing evidence suggests that the blockade of β-adrenergic signaling can inhibit tumor growth. However, the effect of β-blockers, which target several signaling pathways, on gastric cancer remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the anti-tumor effects of propranolol, a non-selective β-blocker, on gastric cancer. We explored the effect of propranolol on the MKN45 and NUGC3 gastric cancer cell lines. Its efficacy and the mechanism by which it exerts anti-tumor effects were examined using several assays (e.g., cell proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis, and wound healing) and a xenograft mouse model. We found that propranolol inhibited tumor growth and induced G1-phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in both cell lines. Propranolol also decreased the expression of phosphorylated CREB-ATF and MEK-ERK pathways; suppressed the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2, 9 and vascular endothelial growth factor; and inhibited gastric cancer cell migration. In the xenograft mouse model, propranolol treatment significantly inhibited tumor growth, and immunohistochemistry revealed that propranolol led to the suppression of proliferation and induction of apoptosis. Propranolol inhibits the proliferation of gastric cancer cells by inducing G1-phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. These findings indicate that propranolol might have an opportunity as a new drug for gastric cancer.

Purpose: Esophageal cancer patients may simultaneously have resectable esophageal cancer and undiagnosable incidental minute solid pulmonary nodules. While the latter is rarely metastatic, only a few studies have reported on the outcomes of such nodules after surgery. In this retrospective study, we assessed the incidence of such nodules, the probability that they are ultimately metastatic nodules, and the prognosis of patients after esophagectomy according to the metastatic status of the nodules. Methods: Data of 398 patients who underwent esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer between January 2012 and December 2016 were collected. We reviewed computed tomography (CT) images from the first visit and searched for incidental minute pulmonary nodules Results: Among the patients who underwent esophagectomy, 149 (37.4%) had one or more minute pulmonary nodules, with a total of 285 nodules. Thirteen (4.6%) of these nodules in 12 (8.1%) patients were ultimately diagnosed as being metastatic. Thirteen (8.7%) patients experienced recurrence at a different location from where the nodules were originally identified. Characteristics of the metastatic nodules were not unique in terms of size, SUVmax, or location in the lungs. Two-year and 5-year overall survival rates of patients whose nodules were metastatic were 64.2 and 32.1%, respectively. Conclusion: The rate of minute pulmonary nodules which were ultimately metastatic was 4.6%. Our findings suggest that esophagectomy followed by the identification of minute pulmonary nodules is an acceptable strategy even if the nodules cannot be diagnosed as being metastatic on the first visit CT due to their small size.

Background The blood concentration of S-1 and adverse events are affected by renal function. Herein, an S-1 dosage formula was developed based on renal function, indicating the dose for a target blood concentration. This study aimed to explore the usefulness of the formula in adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Methods In this ad hoc analysis of the JCOG1001 trial, which evaluated the role of bursectomy for resectable gastric cancer, the recommended dose of S-1 was calculated using the following formula: 1447.8 × (14.5 + 0.301 × CLcr + 8.23 × SEX [male = 1, female = 0]) × body surface area (BSA) (mg/day). Patients were divided into three groups by comparing the initial S-1 dose determined using BSA with the dose recommended by the formula: underdose (UD), equal dose (ED), and overdose (OD). Results Among 686 eligible patients, 58, 304, and 324 patients were classified into the UD, ED, and OD groups. The patients’ characteristics in the UD/ED/OD groups were median age (53.5/64.0/67.5 years), male sex (98.3%/75.3%/58.0%), and median BMI (24.8/22.8/22.3), respectively. The planned 1-year adjuvant S-1 therapy was completed in 74.1%/73.7%/68.5%, dose reduction was required in 8.6%/21.1%/30.6%, and treatment schedule was altered in 8.6%/17.1/19.8% in the UD/ED/OD groups, resulting in the 5-year overall survival rates of 77.3%/74.3%/77.0%, respectively. The incidences of grade > 3 anemia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, stomatitis, and anorexia were significantly higher in the OD group than in the ED and UD groups. Conclusions Dose optimization using an S-1 dosage formula can potentially reduce grade ≥ 3 adverse events for overdosed patients.

The appropriate surgical procedure for patients with upper third early gastric cancer is controversial. We compared total gastrectomy (TG) with proximal gastrectomy (PG) in this patient population. A multicenter, non-randomized trial was conducted, with patients treated with PG or TG. We compared short- and long-term outcomes between these procedures. Between 2009 and 2014, we enrolled 254 patients from 22 institutions; data from 252 were included in the analysis. These 252 patients were assigned to either the PG (n = 159) or TG (n = 93) group. Percentage of body weight loss (%BWL) at 1 year after surgery, i.e., the primary endpoint, in the PG group was significantly less than that of the TG group (− 12.8% versus − 16.9%; p = 0.0001). For short-term outcomes, operation time was significantly shorter for PG than TG (252 min versus 303 min; p

It remains unclear whether Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a major cause of gastric cancer (GC), is involved in other intestinal cancers. In our previous study, ICOS+ Foxp3+ CD4+ T cells (ICOS+ Tregs) in GC tumors were identified as effector Tregs and associated with H. pylori. In the present study, the impact of ICOS+ Tregs on not only GC, but also colorectal cancer (CRC) and their prognosis was investigated in association with H. pylori. Tissue-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) purified from fresh tumor and sera were obtained from GC and CRC patients prospectively. % ICOS+ Tregs were analyzed by flow cytometry and their production of anti-H. pylori antibody (Hp-Ab) in sera was detected by ELISA. % ICOS+ Tregs were higher in GC and CRC patients with Hp-Ab than in those without Hp-Ab, including eradicated patients. ICOS+ Tregs purified had higher potential to produce IL-10 than ICOS- Tregs. For prognostic analysis, immunohistochemical analysis and ELISA were performed using archival fixed specimens and frozen sera, respectively, obtained from GC and CRC patients. Overall survival was longer in patients with low % ICOS+ Tregs than in those with high % ICOS+ Tregs, and patients with Hp-Ab showed shorter recurrence-free survival than those without Hp-Ab. These results suggested that ICOS+ Tregs in GC and CRC patients were closely associated with H. pylori in gastric epithelium and their prognosis, and that pre-operative H. pylori eradication has potential as a novel immunotherapy for GC and CRC patients.

Cisplatin plus S-1 (CS) is the standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in Japan. A previous phase III trial showed that docetaxel plus S-1 (DS) was effective for AGC without measurable lesions, but no studies have compared these two regimens. Eligible patients had unresectable or recurrent HER2-negative AGC without measurable lesions. Patients were randomized to DS (docetaxel 40 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1 80–120 mg on days 1–14, every 3 weeks) or CS (cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 8, S-1 80–120 mg on days 1–21, every 5 weeks). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). All patients had unresectable primary disease. Sixty-one patients were randomly assigned to DS (n = 30) or CS (n = 31). One CS patient was ineligible due to HER2 positivity. The median number of cycles was 9.5 (range 2–49) with DS and 5.5 (range 1–10) with CS. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common grade 3–4 non-hematological toxicity was fatigue (7% with DS, 13% with CS), followed by anorexia (3% with DS, 10% with CS) and diarrhea (3% with DS, 10% with CS). The 2-year OS rates were 43.3% with DS and 30.0% with CS (log-rank P = 0.113), with a hazard ratio of 0.617 (95% confidence interval 0.337–1.128), indicating non-inferiority of DS to CS with respect to OS (P

Background Predictive factors of nivolumab treatment response in patients with gastric cancer (GC) remain unclear. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, tissue specimens of patients with unresectable or recurrent GC and prior or scheduled treatment with nivolumab as third-line or higher therapy between September 2017 and February 2019 were collected from 23 institutions. The tumour-positive score (TPS) and combined positive score (CPS) of PD-L1 expression and mismatch repair (MMR) were analysed by immunohistochemistry. Associations between clinicopathological factors and tumour-response rate, hyperprogressive disease (HPD) rate and survival were assessed. Results Of 200 eligible patients, 143 had measurable lesions. The response and HPD rates were 17.5% and 22.1%, respectively. The response rate was significantly higher in patients with performance status (PS) 0–1 (P = 0.026), non-peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.021), PD-L1 TPS ≥ 1 (P = 0.012), CPS ≥ 5 (P = 0.007) or ≥ 10 (P P P = 0.026), liver metastasis (P P = 0.048). Multivariate analysis revealed that CPS (P = 0.001) and MMR (P = 0.002) were independent prognostic factors of progression-free survival, as well as liver metastasis (P P = 0.004) and CRP (P Conclusions PD-L1 CPS and MMR could be useful biomarkers for nivolumab treatment efficacy in GC. Clinical trial registration UMIN000032164.

Recent studies have found a negative impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival outcomes, but it has not been confirmed by data obtained from a prospective study with a large sample size. This study investigated the impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival outcomes, and considered the optimal definition of complication, using data from JCOG1001, which compared bursectomy and non-bursectomy for patients with cT3/4a locally advanced gastric cancer. This study included 1191 of 1204 patients enrolled in the JCOG1001 trial. Complications were graded by Clavien–Dindo (C-D) classification. Impact of the grade (≥ C-D grade II or ≥ grade III) or type (any or intra-abdominal infectious) of complication on survival outcome was evaluated by univariate and multivariable analyses using the Cox proportional hazard model. The incidence of any ≥ C-D grade II and ≥ grade III complication was 23.0% and 9.7%, respectively, and that of ≥ grade II and ≥ grade III intra-abdominal infectious complication was 13.4% and 6.9%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed all four definitions of complications were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Conversely, only any ≥ C-D grade III complication was found to be an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.445; 95% confidence interval, 1.026–2.036; P = 0.035). Postoperative complications adversely affect the long-term survival outcomes of patients with cT3/4a gastric cancer. Any ≥ C-D grade III complication seems to be the most suitable definition of complication for predicting negative long-term survival outcomes.

We previously reported the HERBIS-4A phase II trial comparing S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) with capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) in chemotherapy-naive patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (GC). We performed a pooled analysis of HERBIS-4A and HERBIS-2, the phase II trial comparing SP with XP in HER2-negative recurrent GC patients with a recurrence-free interval after S-1 adjuvant therapy of ≥ 6 months. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SP [S-1 (40–60 mg twice daily for 21 days) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 8), every 5 weeks] or XP [capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1), every 3 weeks]. In the pooled analysis, SP (n = 44–50) showed a longer progression-free survival [6.4 versus 5.1 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.666; P = 0.062], overall survival (14.8 versus 10.6 months; HR, 0.695; P = 0.099), and time to treatment failure (4.6 versus 3.6 months; HR, 0.668; P = 0.045) as well as a higher disease control rate (86.4% versus 68.1%, P = 0.149) compared with XP (n = 47–51). A significant survival advantage for SP over XP was apparent in patients with a performance status of 0, a differentiated-type tumor histology, or a primary tumor localization to the upper portion of the stomach. Our pooled analysis supports the use of SP in the first-line setting for patients with HER2-negative advanced or recurrent GC with a recurrence-free interval of ≥ 6 months. The HERBIS-2 trial was registered with UMIN-CTR as UMIN000006105.

Older or frail patients are often underrepresented in clinical trials for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We here assessed the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)–leucovorin plus bevacizumab in such patients. The study (OGSG 0802) was designed as a single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial. Eligible patients had mCRC and at least one of the following: an age of ≥ 65 years, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or 2, a serum albumin level of ≤ 3.5 g/dL, incompatibility with oxaliplatin or irinotecan, and a history of abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy. Patients received 5-FU (600 mg/m2) and l-leucovorin (200 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 together with bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Forty-one patients were enrolled and eligible. Median age was 76 years (range 56–90 years), and 51% of patients had a performance status of 0. The ORR was 36.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.1–53.1%], median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI 7.4–17.7 months), and median OS was 24.0 months (95% CI 19.9 months—not reached). The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were neutropenia (24%), anorexia (10%), leukopenia (7%), and mucositis/stomatitis (7%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Weekly 5-FU–leucovorin with biweekly bevacizumab may be a tolerable and effective treatment option for older or frail patients with mCRC.

Since the prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains poor, more intensive treatments, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), should be developed. We retrospectively examined whether neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S‑1 (DOS) combination chemotherapy resulted in a favorable clinical response and acceptable toxicity in patients with AEG.This retrospective cohort study included 36 consecutive patients with cStage IIB-IV AEG (Siewert types I-III). Regarding stage IV disease, patients with resectable distant lymph node metastasis (M1-LYM) were eligible. Patients underwent three 3-week cycles of docetaxel (40 mg/mThree cycles of neoadjuvant DOS were completed in 28 (78%) patients. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, anorexia, and diarrhea were observed in 26 (72%), 7 (19%), and 4 (11%) patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in six (17%) patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. R0 resection was achieved in 35 (97%) patients, and postoperative morbidities of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher were observed in 6 (17%) patients. Pathological complete response was observed in 11 (31%) of 36 patients. Pathological response rates of grade ≥ 2 and grade ≥ 1b were 47 and 72%, respectively. Two-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 60.1 and 81.2%, respectively.Neoadjuvant DOS therapy for AEG produced high pathological response rates with an acceptable safety profile, and may be a promising treatment strategy.

339 Background: Due to a lack of efficacy and long-term survival seen in previously-studied therapies, new therapies for pretreated advanced GC are warranted. E7389-LF is a new formulation that uses liposomes to encapsulate eribulin; this is anticipated to improve eribulin concentration in tumor tissues. E7389-LF and nivolumab have both shown efficacy as monotherapy in pretreated GC. E7389-LF may also synergize well with PD-1 inhibitors by acting as a cytotoxic therapy and by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Methods: Patients (pts) with unresectable and measurable GC, esophageal cancer, or small cell lung cancer who were previously treated with 1 (2 for GC) chemotherapy regimens were enrolled in the phase 2 part of Study 120 and treated with E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 plus nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W). In the GC cohort, pts had to show disease progression from combination therapy including a platinum drug + fluoropyrimidine (1st-line therapy) and a taxane-containing regimen (2nd-line therapy). The primary objective of the phase 2 part was to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR); secondary objectives included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and pharmacokinetics. Other efficacy (including overall survival [OS]) and biomarker objectives were exploratory. Tumor responses were assessed by the investigators per RECIST v1.1. Results: 31 GC pts were included; median age was 63 years; 18 pts were male, 13 were female. By the data cutoff date (May 31, 2022), 29 pts discontinued (26 due to disease progression, 3 due to adverse events). 8 Pts had a partial response (PR); the ORR was 25.8% (95% CI 11.9–44.6). The median PFS was 2.69 months (95% CI 1.91–2.99). The median OS was 7.85 months (95% CI 4.47–not estimable). The 6-month OS rate was 61.3%; the 9-month OS rate was 44.7%. 30 Pts had ≥1 treatment-related TEAE, most commonly neutropenia (n = 24); 25 pts had at least 1 grade ≥3 treatment-related TEAE, most commonly neutropenia (n = 22). 16 Pts had ≥1 TEAE resulting in dose reduction of E7389-LF. 4 Pts had ≥1 TEAE resulting in withdrawal of E7389-LF or nivolumab, including asthma, cerebral hemorrhage, decreased appetite, pulmonary edema, and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (each n = 1). 29 Pts had an evaluable PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS); 5 of 20 pts (25.0%) with a CPS of < 5 and 2 of 9 (22.2%) with a CPS of ≥5 had a PR. Increases in pharmacodynamic markers including vasculature-related markers were observed; antitumor immunity was observed per changes in interferon gamma (IFNγ) and IFNγ-related markers. Conclusions: E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 in combination with nivolumab 360 mg Q3W had promising efficacy for pretreated GC, as evidenced by the notable ORR of 25.8% as well as by PFS and OS. No new safety signals were identified for this combination. Biomarker changes suggested vascular remodeling activity and enhancement of antitumor immunity via IFNγ signaling. Clinical trial information: NCT04078295 .

TPS479 Background: The standard treatment for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer invading the greater curvature is “open total gastrectomy combined with splenectomy” (OTG+S) aiming for whole clearance of the splenic hilar lymph nodes. However, its pertinent postoperative severe complication (e.g. pancreatic fistula) is problematic. An objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of “laparoscopic or robotic total gastrectomy with spleen-preserving splenic hilar dissection” (LRSHD) as a new treatment option which has a potential to reduce surgical morbidity, subsequently to replace the current standard treatment, OTG+S. Methods: This is a multicenter single-arm phase II trial. The main eligibility criteria are as follows; clinical T2-4a resectable locally advanced proximal gastric adenocarcinoma that invades the greater curvature; without obvious lymph node metastasis at the splenic hilum nor direct invasion to the spleen/splenogastric ligament. Protocol treatment is laparoscopic or robotic total gastrectomy with splenic hilar lymph node dissection (D2 + No.10 lymphadenectomy according to the Japanese guidelines) in which the spleen is preserved with skeletonizing the splenic vessels. Quality control of surgery is assured by surgeon’s qualification and central peer review of intraoperative photo at the splenic hilum after dissection. The primary endpoint is the proportion of postoperative pancreatic fistula and/or intra-abdominal abscess formation with Clavien-Dindo Grade III or higher (within 30 days after surgery). Secondary endpoints are intraoperative blood loss, operation time, mortality, overall postoperative complication, number of yield splenic hilar nodes, number of metastatic splenic hilar nodes, conversion to splenectomy, conversion to laparotomy, relapse-free survival, and overall survival. Sample size was set as 85 patients to obtain 80% power considering that 15% of patients are judged as unresectable intraoperatively, with the hypothesis that the primary endpoint would have an expected value of 7% and a threshold value of 16% in one-sided alpha of 0.1. Planned accrual period is 5 years. The accrual began in August 2019. As of August 2022, 53 of the planned 85 patients (62.4%) have been enrolled. When the safety of LRSHD is proved by this study, a non-inferiority phase III trial will be consequently launched. Clinical trial registry number: UMIN000037580. Clinical trial information: UMIN000037580 .

Background Despite the effectiveness of imatinib mesylate (IM), most gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) develop IM resistance, mainly due to the additional kinase-domain mutations accompanied by concomitant reactivation of KIT tyrosine kinase. Heat-shock protein 90 (HSP90) is one of the chaperone molecules required for appropriate folding of proteins such as KIT. Methods We used a novel HSP90 inhibitor, TAS-116, which showed specific binding to HSP90α/β with low toxicity in animal models. The efficacy and mechanism of TAS-116 against IM-resistant GIST were evaluated by using IM-naïve and IM-resistant GIST cell lines. We also evaluated the effects of TAS-116 on the other HSP90 client protein, EGFR, by using lung cell lines. Results TAS-116 inhibited growth and induced apoptosis in both IM-naïve and IM-resistant GIST cell lines with KIT activation. We found KIT was activated mainly in intracellular compartments, such as trans-Golgi cisternae, and TAS-116 reduced autophosphorylated KIT in the Golgi apparatus. In IM-resistant GISTs in xenograft mouse models, TAS-116 caused tumour growth inhibition. We found that TAS-116 decreased phosphorylated EGFR levels and inhibited the growth of EGFR-mutated lung cancer cell lines. Conclusion TAS-116 may be a novel promising drug to overcome tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistance in both GIST and EGFR-mutated lung cancer.

Background Large type 3 and type 4 gastric cancers have extremely poor prognoses. To address this, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be a promising approach. The phase III JCOG0501 study, conducted to confirm the superiority of neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin followed by D2 gastrectomy over upfront surgery, showed no survival benefit for neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin. In Korea, the PRODIGY study, which was a phase III study of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (DOS) followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1 versus surgery and adjuvant S-1 for gastric cancer of T2-3N+ or T4Nany, showed that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly superior in the neoadjuvant DOS arm. Therefore, DOS therapy may be a promising candidate for preoperative chemotherapy for large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer. Methods Preoperative docetaxel 40 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 will be intravenously administered on day1 every three weeks. S-1 will be orally administered 80 mg/m2 on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle. Patients will receive three courses of treatment and gastrectomy with ≥D2 lymph node dissection. Postoperative S-1 plus docetaxel therapy (DS) will be administered according to the JACCRO GC-07 (START-2) study. The primary endpoint is the 3-year PFS rate. Secondary endpoints include PFS time, overall survival time, pathological response rate, response rate according to RECIST version1.1, proportion of completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, R0 resection rate, proportion of completion of surgery, proportion of completion of protocol treatment, proportion of negative conversion of CY, adverse event occurrence rate, and nutritional evaluation. The null hypothesis for the 3-year PFS rate is 45% and the expected value is 60%. The total sample size is 46 considering that the registration period and follow-up period are two and three years, respectively. Discussion This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial assessing the efficacy and safety of preoperative DOS and postoperative DS for large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer. The results will inform future phase III trials and are expected to lead to new treatment strategies for large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer. Trial registration Registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on October 11, 2019 (jRCTs051190060).

Complete surgical resection is the only treatment for resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Three-year adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is recommended for patients with high-risk GISTs. However, there are scarce data on this topic in Japan. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of AC in Japanese patients with high-risk GISTs.Patients with high-risk GISTs who received complete resections during 1992-2019 in our hospitals were included in this retrospective study. We evaluated patients' treatments with or without AC, completion rates, adverse events (AEs), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS).Overall, 89 patients categorized as high risk were enrolled in this study. Fifty-five patients received AC (AC group), and 34 patients did not receive AC (control group). Twenty-three (41.8%) patients experienced Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Grade 2 or higher AEs. At a median follow-up of 61.6 months, 41 (74.5%) patients completed the planned treatment (including six patients with ongoing treatment), whereas 14 (25.4%) patients did not complete the treatment owing to the development of AEs (nine patients), patients' request (three patients), recurrence (one patient), and mutational analysis (one patient). Comparing the data between the treatment and control groups, the RFS rate was significantly better for the AC group (P 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the OS rate between the two groups.Postoperative AC was well tolerated by Japanese patients at an acceptable rate, and its use may reduce the risk of recurrence in patients with high-risk GISTs.

It has been suggested that the therapeutic efficacy of S-1 + cisplatin (SP) and capecitabine + cisplatin (XP) may differ depending on the histology of the tumor, but no clear evidence exists. Individual participant data were obtained from three randomized phase II trials in which such patients received either SP (S-1 [40–60 mg twice daily for 21 days] plus cisplatin [60 mg/m2 on day 8], every 5 weeks) or XP (capecitabine [1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days] plus cisplatin [80 mg/m2 on day 1], every 3 weeks). A total of 162 patients were included, with 79 patients in the SP arm and 83 patients in the XP arm. Although there was also no difference between arms in ORR according to histological classification, differentiated tumors showed a significantly better OS (but not PFS) for SP versus XP that was associated with a deeper tumor shrinkage. Undifferentiated tumors showed a consistently better OS, and PFS for SP versus XP, likely because cases without tumor shrinkage tended to be fewer for SP. Our data thus showed that SP was superior to XP in this setting, but there were qualitative differences in therapeutic efficacy dependent on tumor histology.

The optimal treatment for liver metastasis from gastric cancer (LMGC) remains uncertain. The relevance of surgical resection is controversial. We conducted a prospective multicenter interventional study of surgical resection for LMGC. Patients with synchronous or metachronous LMGC who were surgically fit were registered. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent R0 resection. Secondary endpoints were R0 resection rate, operative morbidity and mortality, 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of R0 patients, and OS in all registered patients. Seventy patients were registered from 24 institutions between December 2011 and November 2019 and received preoperative chemotherapy. Three patients were ineligible, and 19 patients discontinued treatment, with disease progression in 12, adverse events in 4, and consent withdrawal in 3 before surgery. Of the 48 patients eventually undergoing surgery, R0 resection of the primary and/or metastatic GC was accomplished in 43 patients, while 1 patient discontinued treatment for positive peritoneal lavage cytology and 4 patients were considered ineligible based on postoperative pathological findings other than GC. The R0 resection rate of all eligible patients was 68.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 55.3–79.4%, 43/63 patients], while that of all resected patients was 89.6% (95% CI 77.3–96.5%, 43/48 patients). Postoperative complications were identified in 12 out of 43 patients (27.9%), and Clavien–Dindo grade III or higher complications occurred in seven patients (16.3%). No hospital mortality was observed. R0 resection for LMGC could be performed in approximately two-thirds of all eligible patients, with acceptable surgical morbidity and mortality.

Background We previously reported the good feasibility and favorable efficacy of perioperative capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in patients (pts) with clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1-3 M0 gastric cancer (GC) in a phase II study in which the pathological response rate, the primary endpoint, of 54.1% was demonstrated. Here, we report 3-year follow-up data. Methods The eligibility criteria included clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1-3 M0 GC according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma-3rd English Edition (JCGC). Three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx (capecitabine, 2000mg/m2 for 14 days; oxaliplatin, 130mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) were administered, followed by 5 cycles of adjuvant CapeOx after D2 gastrectomy. Three-year overall survival and relapse-free survival are presented here, and analyzed by cohorts based on pathologic response rate (pRR). Results Thirty-seven pts were enrolled from July 2016 to May 2017, and fully evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. Thirty-three pts (89.2%) completed the planned three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx and underwent gastrectomy, with an R0 resection rate of 78.4% (n = 29). The overall survival (OS) rate and relapse-free survival (RFS) rate at 3 years was 83.8% (95% CI, 72.7-96.5%) and 73.0% (95% CI, 60.0-88.8%), respectively. Further, the 3-year OS rate in pts with pathological response of grade 1a (n = 13) and grade 1b or higher (n = 20) was 69.2% (95% CI: 48.2-99.5%) and 100.0%, respectively, based on JCGC. Pathological response rate was classified according to JCGC as follows: grade 0, the tumor was not affected; grade 1a, less than one-third of the tumor was affected; grade 1b, one to two thirds of the tumor was affected; grade 2, greater than or equal to two thirds was affected; and grade 3, no residual tumor. A pathological response was defined as grade 1b or greater. Conclusion Perioperative CapeOx showed good feasibility and favorable prognosis, especially in pts with pathological response of grade 1b or higher and was found to be useful in predicting prognosis. The data obtained using this novel approach warrant further investigation (Trial ID: UMIN000021641, jRCTs051180109).

Aim We evaluated the efficacy and safety of TAS-116, a novel class of an orally active selective inhibitor of heat shock protein 90, in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) after failure of three or more lines of standard treatment with imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib. Methods In this single-arm phase II study, patients received 160 mg/day oral TAS-116 for five consecutive days, followed by a 2-day rest. The primary end-point was centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end-points were objective response rate, disease control rate, overall survival (OS), metabolic response rate, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics. Results Forty-one patients were enrolled in Japan, and 40 patients underwent efficacy and safety evaluation. At the cut-off date, the median PFS was 4.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8–6.0) and 12-week progression-free rate was 73.4% (95% CI, 58.1–88.7). Thirty-four patients (85.0%) had stable disease for ≥ 6 weeks. The median OS was 11.5 months (95% CI, 7.0–not reached). All patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (AE), including diarrhoea (80.0%), decreased appetite (45.0%) and increase in blood creatinine level (42.5%). Grade ≥3 AEs and treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 23 (57.5%) and 21 (52.5%) patients, respectively. All AEs resolved after dose modification, and no TAS-116–related AEs led to treatment discontinuation. Conclusion TAS-116 showed significant activity in advanced GIST refractory to standard treatment. Further development of TAS-116 is warranted. Trial registration JapicCTI-163182.

Surgery often introduce inflammatory response, which may promote tumor growth and metastasis of residual cancer cells. We investigated the impacts of methylprednisolone on the tumor growth and peritoneal seedings in mice treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which mimics systemic inflammation induced by surgical stress and postoperative complications. The serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, tumor volume, tumor weight, and the number of peritoneal nodules were investigated in tumor growth model and peritoneal seeding model using BALB/c mice and murine CT26 cancer cell lines in vivo. We conducted functional analyses of IL-6 in Western blotting and proliferation assays in vitro. We also investigated whether preoperative administration of methylprednisolone decreased postoperative serum IL-6 levels in cancer patients in a randomized clinical study. In the in vivo study, methylprednisolone inhibited the LPS-induced increase of serum IL-6 levels (mean, 33,756 pg/ml vs. 5917 pg/ml; P

A cytotoxic chemotherapeutic regimen is not routinely recommended for frail elderly patients with unresectable colorectal cancer (CRC) because of susceptibility to treatment. Panitumumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Use of panitumumab as first-line therapy is expected to be well tolerated and to improve survival rates, even in patients who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, the efficacy and safety of panitumumab as the first-line therapy for the frail elderly patients with unresectable CRC have not been yet studied. We plan to conduct a prospective multi-center phase II study. Patients with wild-type RAS unresectable CRC aged ≥76 years or ≥ 65 who are not considered eligible for intensive chemotherapy will be included in the study. A total of 36 patients will be enrolled from Osaka Gastrointestinal Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group for over 2 years. Panitumumab 6 mg/kg IV infusion will be administered every 2 weeks. The purpose of this trial is to assess the efficacy of panitumumab as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable CRC. The primary endpoint is to determine the disease control rate. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, response rate, time to treatment failure, and the incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities. This is a prospective phase II trial assessing the efficacy of panitumumab monotherapy in the elderly patients with wild-type RAS unresectable CRC. The ethics committee of the Osaka Medical College approved this study on November 7, 2016. The trial registration number of the government was UMIN000024528 on December 1, 2016. It was registered prospectively (the day of enrollment of the first participant was February 9, 2017).

Background A multidisciplinary approach based on guidelines and pathological diagnosis by specialized pathologists are important for improving the prognosis and QoL of GIST patients. This study examined the adherence to the guidelines and the concordance of the pathological diagnosis of high-risk GISTs. Patients and methods Among 541 patients with high-risk GISTs recruited to the prospective registry between Dec. 2012 and Dec. 2015, 534 patients were analyzed after central pathology with KIT and DOG1 IHC and genotyping of KIT and PDGFRA. Results Of the 534 patients, 432 (81%) received imatinib adjuvant therapy at a starting dose of 400 or 300 mg/day. Multivariate analysis indicated that age (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.58–0.88), tumor size (HR for > 10 cm vs 10 vs

Background/aim Trastuzumab with S-1 plus cisplatin was proved to be effective for human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive advanced gastric cancer with measurable lesions. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in the absence of measurable lesions are unknown. Patients and methods Patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer without measurable lesions received cisplatin plus trastuzumab intravenously on day 1 and oral S-1 on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end-point was overall survival, and 40 patients were planned to be enrolled. Results Fifteen patients were enrolled. The median overall survival was 14.4 months. The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 66.7 % and 26.7 %, respectively. Major grade 3-4 adverse events included neutropenia (47%), anemia (40%), diarrhea (20%), nausea (20%), and anorexia (20%). Conclusion Trastuzumab with S-1 plus cisplatin might be effective and tolerable for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer without measurable lesions.