Search

Background: Extending adjuvant endocrine treatment (ET) with aromatase inhibitors (AI) to 7-10 years decreases the risk of relapse in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). However, such benefit comes at the price of higher incidence of skeletal and cardiovascular (CV) events. Biomarkers predicting such toxicities might help clinicians in tailoring adjuvant ET to patient’s needs. We conducted a prospective study to assess whether SNPs in the gene encoding for the aromatase enzyme (CYP19A1) affect the risk of skeletal and CV events in HR+ early BC patients enrolled in the GIM4 trial. Methods: The GIM4 trial randomized HR+ BC postmenopausal patients who had been already treated with 2-3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen to either 3-2 years or 5 years of adjuvant letrozole. Four SNPs of CYP19A1 were evaluated: rs10046, rs4646, rs479292 and rs727479. SNPs were genotyped through PCR on DNA obtained from patients’ peripheral blood samples. Skeletal and CV events were assessed from randomization in the GIM4 trial to last follow-up, disease recurrence or death. Skeletal events were defined as the onset of osteoporosis or bone fractures. CV events were defined as the onset of thrombosis, embolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, hearth failure, or arrythmia. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the association between SNPs and skeletal and CV events. Bonferroni correction for multiplicity was used for univariate SNPs association tests, with a corrected alpha of 0.012. Only associations with an alpha level Citation Format: Benedetta Conte, Chiara Molinelli, Giancarlo Bisagni, Antonio Durando, Giovanni Sanna, Stefania Gori, Ornella Garrone, Stefano Tamberi, Sabino De Placido, Francesco Schettini, Antonio Pazzola, Riccardo Ponzone, Filippo Montemurro, Gianluigi Lunardi, Rosario Notaro, Anna Turletti, Claudia Bighin, Francesca Poggio, Giulia Buzzatti, Matteo Lambertini, Luca Boni, Lucia Del Mastro. Single nucletotide polymorphisms of aromatase gene (CYP19A1) and toxicity of adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: A translational, prospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-03.

Metronomic chemotherapy (mCHT) refers to the minimum biologically effective dose of a chemotherapy agent given as a continuous dosing regimen, with no prolonged drug-free breaks, that leads to antitumor activity. Aim of the present study is to describe the use of mCHT in a retrospective cohort of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients in order to collect data regarding the different types and regimens of drugs employed, their efficacy and safety. Between January 2011 and December 2016, data of 584 metastatic breast cancer patients treated with mCHT were collected. The use of VRL-based regimens increased during the time of observation (2011: 16.8% - 2016: 29.8%), as well as CTX-based ones (2011: 17.1% - 2016: 25.6%), whereas CAPE-based and MTX-based regimens remained stable. In the 1st-line setting, the highest ORR and DCR were observed for VRL-based regimens (single agent: 44% and 88%; combination: 36.7% and 82.4%, respectively). Assuming VRL-single agent as the referee treatment (median PFS: 7.2 months, 95% CI: 5.3–10.3), the longest median PFS were observed in VRL-combination regimens (9.5, 95%CI 88.8–11.3, HR = 0.72) and in CAPE-single agent (10.7, 95%CI 8.3–15.8, HR = 0.70). The VICTOR-6 study provides new data coming from the real-life setting, by adding new information regarding the use of mCHT as an option of treatment for MBC patients.

The GIM2 phase III trial demonstrated the benefit of dose-dense chemotherapy in node-positive early breast cancer (eBC). To better define the dose-dense effect in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup, we evaluated its benefit through a composite measure of recurrence risk. We conducted an ancillary analysis of the GIM2 trial evaluating the absolute treatment effect through a composite measure of recurrence risk (CPRS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative eBC. CPRS was estimated through Cox proportional hazards models applied to the different clinicopathological features. The treatment effect was compared to the values of CPRS by using the Sub-population Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) process. The Disease-Free Survival (DFS)-oriented STEPP analysis showed distinct patterns of relative treatment effect with respect to CPRS. Overall, 5-year DFS differed across CPRS quartiles ranging from 95.2 to 66.4%. Each CPRS quartile was characterized by a different patients’ composition, especially for age, lymph node involvement, tumor size, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, and Ki-67. A number needed to treat of 154 and 6 was associated with the lowest and the highest CPRS quartile, respectively. Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy showed a consistent benefit in node-positive eBC patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative disease, but its effect varied according to CPRS.

Previous analyses of the GIM (Gruppo Italiano Mammella) 2 study showed that addition of fluorouracil to epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel in patients with node-positive early breast cancer does not improve outcome, whereas dose-dense chemotherapy induces a significant improvement in both disease-free survival and overall survival as compared with a standard schedule. Here, we present long-term results of the study.In this 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients aged 18-70 years with operable, node-positive, breast cancer with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 from 81 hospitals in Italy. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1:1:1) to one of the four following study groups: four cycles of standard-interval intravenous EC (epirubicin 90 mg/mBetween April 24, 2003, and July 3, 2006, 2091 patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 545 to q3EC-P, 544 to q3FEC-P, 502 to q2EC-P, and 500 to q2FEC-P. 88 patients were enrolled in centres providing only standard interval schedule and were assigned only to q3FEC-P and q3EC-P; thus, 2091 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis for the comparison of EC-P (1047 patients) versus FEC-P (1044 patients) and 2003 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis for the comparison of dose-dense (1002 patients) versus standard interval analysis (1001 patients). After a median follow-up of 15·1 years (IQR 8·4-16·3), median disease-free survival was not significantly different between FEC-P and EC-P groups (17·09 years [95% CI 15·51-not reached] vs not reached [17·54-not reached]; unadjusted hazard ratio 1·12 [95% CI 0·98-1·29]; log-rank p=0·11). Median disease-free survival was significantly higher in the dose-dense interval group than the standard-interval group (not reached [95% CI 17·45-not reached] vs 16·52 [14·24-17·54]; 0·77 [95% CI 0·67-0·89]; p=0·0004). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (200 [37%] of 536 patients in the q3EC-P group vs 257 [48%] of 533 in the q3FEC-P group vs 50 [10%] of 496 q2EC-P vs 97 [20%] of 492) and alopecia (238 [44%] vs 249 [47%] vs 228 [46%] vs 235 [48%]). During extended follow-up, no further grade 3-4 adverse events or deaths related to toxic-effects were reported. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in nine (2%) patients in the q3EC-P group, seven (1%) in the q3FEC-P group, nine (2%) in the q2EC-P group, and nine (2%) in the q2FEC-P group. No treatment-related deaths occurred.Updated results from the GIM2 study support that optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk early breast cancer should not include fluorouracil and should use a dose-dense schedule.Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pharmacia, Dompè Biotec Italy, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, and Alliance Against Cancer.

Purpose Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a subtype of breast cancer which lacks the expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2): TNBC accounts for approximately 20% of newly diagnosed breast cancers and is associated with younger age at diagnosis, greater recurrence risk and shorter survival time. Therapeutic options are very scarce. Aim of the present analysis is to provide further insights into the clinical activity of metronomic chemotherapy (mCHT), in a real-life setting. Methods We used data included in the VICTOR-6 study for the present analysis. VICTOR-6 is an Italian multicentre retrospective cohort study, which collected data of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who have received mCHT between 2011 and 2016. Amongst the 584 patients included in the study, 97 were triple negative. In 40.2% of the TNBC patients, mCHT was the first chemotherapy treatment, whereas 32.9% had received 2 or more lines of treatment for the metastatic disease. 45.4% out of 97 TNBC patients received a vinorelbine (VRL)-based regimen, which resulted in the most used type of mCHT, followed by cyclophosphamide (CTX)-based regimens (30.9%) and capecitabine (CAPE)-based combinations (22.7%). Results Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 17.5% and 64.9%, respectively. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.9–7.2) and 12.1 months (95% CI: 9.6–16.7). Median PFS was 6.9 months for CAPE-based regimens (95% CI: 5.0–18.4), 6.1 months (95% CI: 4.0–8.9) for CTX-based and 5.3 months (95% CI: 4.1–9.5) for VRL-based ones. Median OS was 18.2 months (95% CI: 9.1-NE) for CAPE-based regimens and 11.8 months for VRL- (95% CI: 9.3–16.7 and CTX-based ones (95%CI: 8.7–52.8). Tumour response, PFS and OS decreased proportionally in later lines. Conclusion This analysis represents the largest series of TNBC patients treated with mCHT in a real-life setting and provides further insights into the advantages of using this strategy even in this poor prognosis subpopulation.

Background: TNBC shows a very bad prognosis: median time to relapse is 18 months and median overall survival (OS) is less than 24 months. Methods: AMBRA is a longitudinal cohort study, describing the choice of 1st- and subsequent treatments in HER2-ve MBC pts in the years 2012-2015. The present analysis is focused on TNBC pts (127 out of 879 evaluable; 14.4%) and CHT strategies, overall and according to adj treatment. Kaplan Meyer probability of survival from primary (DFS), 1st(PFS1) and 2nd(PFS2) progression and Time from last CHT and death were calculated for the whole population and according the main adj regimens. Results: Median age at primary diagnosis was 53 years. The most used regimens in the adj setting were anthra/taxane(tax) 50.7%, anthra 22.1% or others (CMF included) 20.6%. Median time to events was: DFS 23.2, PFS1 6.5 and PFS2 4.3 months, respectively. CHT choices in the metastatic setting according to adj treatment were: Adj Anthra-basedAdj Taxane-basedAdj other1st-lineTax* 57.6% - VRL/CAPE 18.2% - Plat 15.2% Other 3% - None 6.1%Tax* 46.2% - VRL/CAPE 24.6% Plat 24.6% - Other 4.6%Tax*52% - VRL/CAPE 16% - Anthra 16% - Anthra/Tax 8%2nd-lineTax**18.2% - Anthra 13.6% - VRL/CAPE 22.7% - Plat 27.3% - Erib 9.1% - Other 9.1%Tax**22% - VRL/CAPE 22% Plat 22% - Erib 14.6% - Other 17.1%VRL/CAPE 38.5% - Anthra 23.1% - Tax**23.1% - Plat 15.4%3rd lineVRL/CAPE 37.5% - Erib 25% - Anthra 18.8% - Tax***12.5% - Plat 6.3%Erib 26.9% - VRL/CAPE 23.1% - Plat 15.4% - Anthra 11.5% - Tax***11.5% - Other 11.5%VRL/CAPE 42.9% - Erib 28.6% - Plat 14.3% - Other 14.3%*docetaxel 8.4%, nab-paclitaxel 7%, paclitaxel 59%**docetaxel 7%, nab-paclitaxel 71.4%, paclitaxel 21%***docetaxel 20%, nab-paclitaxel 80%At a median follow up of 3.3 years 50% of pts are still alive. OS rates at 5 and 8 years from primary are 50% and 40%. OS rates from 1st progression are 50% and 20% at 22 and 40 months. Median OS (months) according to 1st line regimen was similar (ns) across the regimens (paclitaxel+bevacizumab: 17.8; Platinum-based: 14.1; CAPE/VRL: 16.3). Median time from last CHT and death was 1.5 months (29.6%< 1 month; 14% < 2 weeks) Conclusion: Our results show that taxanes play a crucial role in MBC even if used in 50% of Adj. CAPE/VRL, Platinum regimens and Eribuline are also widely used. Time from last CHT administration and Death is very short in 30% of cases Citation Format: Giorgio Mustacchi, Alessandra Beano, Alessandra Fabi, Lorenzo Livi, Antonio Bernardo, Ferdinando Riccardi, Paolo Marchetti, Ornella Garrone, Lucrezia Diodati, Laura Biganzoli, Monica Giordano, Anna Turletti, Livio Blasi, Andrea Milani, Clara Natoli, Marta Riemma, Alessia D'Alonzo, Grazia Arpino, Paolo Pronzato, Marina E Cazzaniga, on behalf of GIM-13 AMBRA Study Group. Triple negative (TNBC) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts): Is chemotherapy (CHT) choice influenced by adjuvant (adj) treatments? Results from the GIM-13 AMBRA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-15-14.

Background The BOLERO-2 trial reported efficacy and safety of Everolimus (EVE) and Exemestane (EXE) combination in HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. The BALLET trial further evaluated the safety of EVE-EXE in HR+ ABC patients, without reporting efficacy data. Aim of the EVA real-life study was to collect data of efficacy and safety of EVE-EXE combination in the clinical setting, as well as exploring efficacy according to EVE Dose-Intensity (DI) and to previous treatment with Fulvestrant. Patients and methods This study aimed to describe the outcome of ABC pts treated with EVE-EXE combination in terms of median duration of EVE treatment and ORR in a real-life setting. Results From July 2013 to December 2015, the EVA study enrolled 404 pts. Median age was 61 years (33–83). Main metastatic sites were: bone (69.1%), soft tissue (34.7%) and viscera (33.2%). Median number of previous treatments was 2 (1–7). 43.3% of the pts had received Fulvestrant. Median exposure to EVE was 31.0 weeks (15.4–58.3) in the whole population. No difference was observed in terms of EVE exposure duration according to DI (p for trend = 0.27) or type of previous treatments (p = 0.33). ORR and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were observed in 31.6% and 60.7% of the patients, respectively, with the lowest ORRs confined in CHT pre-treated patients or in those who received the lowest DI of EVE. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 37.9% of the patients. Main AEs were: stomatitis (11.2%), non-infectious pneumonitis - NIP (3.8%), anaemia (3.8%) and fatigue (3.2%). Conclusions The EVA study provided new insights in the use of EVE-EVE combination in HR+ ABC pts many years after the publication of the pivotal trial. The combination is safe and the best response could be obtained in patients receiving the full dose of EVE and/or after hormone-therapy as Fulvestrant in ABC.

BACKGROUND Pts with ABC have a diverse clinical course and OS rates vary significantly among pts. New strategies had potentially changed the natural history of these pts, however data from clinical studies are still lacking and Real-World Studies (RWS) are crucial in clinical outcome evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS AMBRA is a longitudinal cohort study, aiming to describe the choice of first and subsequent lines of treatment in HER2-ve ABC pts receiving at least one CHT (SABCS 2016, P5-15-07 & P5-14-09) in the years 2012-2015. The present analysis is focused on the description of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and OS according to the biologic subtype in the deceased population. So far, 791/1500 pts have been registered into the study and 255 (32.2%) are evaluable. Time to event analysis between subtypes was evaluated by Cox-Mantel Hazard Ratio and Logrank Test. DFS by Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test RESULTS Pts distribution according to molecular subtype was: Luminal A (86, 33.7%), Luminal B (107 (42.1%), TNBC (62, 24.3%). Median ages at diagnosis were 55.8, 52.9 and 55.1 years for the 3 subgroups, respectively. Mean DFS was significantly different according to the molecular subtypes: 87.28, 61.37 and 23.9 months. The difference between Luminal B and TNBC is statistically significant as well. Mean PFS of 1st-line therapy was 17.9 11.7 and 7.8 months respectively. Mean OS from 1stprogression was 32.9 24.2 and 15.8 months respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our data confirm in a RWS the different biological behaviour between Lum A and B. Metastatic life span is quite good for Luminals and disappointing for TNBC. Median time from last CHT and Death is quite short and similar. Luminal ALuminal BTNBCMean DFS (months)87.28 [95%CI: 72.9-101.7]61.37 [95%CI: 52.3-70.4] p=0003623.9 months [95%CI: 18.5-29.3] p=0.000000Mean PFS (months)17.9 [95%CI: 12.5-23.5]11.7 [95%CI:9.8-13.7]7.8 months [95%CI: 5.9-9.6]Mean OS from 1st progression (months)32.9 [95%CI:25.4-40.4]24.2 [95%CI: 21.3-26.9]15.8 [95%CI: 13.0-18.6]Median time from last CHT and Death (months)2.231.951.53Lum A/Lum B HR (p value)Lum A/TNBC HR (p value)Lum B/TNBC HR (p value)PFS 1st-Line0.73 (0.02)0.49 (0.0000)0.63 (0.003)OS from diagnosis (years)0.59 (0.0003)0.25 (0.0000)0.34 (0.0000)OS from 1st-PD0.72 (0.02)0.47 (0.0000)0.50 (0.0002) Citation Format: Marina Elena Cazzaniga, Sabino De Placido, Alessia D'Alonzo, Michela Piezzo, Clara Natoli, Andrea Milani, Alessandra Bologna, Massimiliano Alu, Anna Turletti, Palma Pugliese, Laura Biganzoli, Claudia De Angelis, Ornella Garrone, Paolo Marchetti, Ferdinando Riccardi, Antonio Bernardo, Lorenzo Livi, Alessandra Fabi, Cristiana Taverniti, Emanuela Romagnoli, Paolo Pronzato, Giorgio Mustacchi, on behalf of GIM-13 AMBRA Study Group. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in HER2-ve advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients (pts) according to the molecular subtype in the era of modern agents. Results from the GIM-13 AMBRA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-07-10.

This abstract was not presented at the conference. Citation Format: Cazzaniga ME, Blasi L, Pronzato P, Giordano M, Garrone O, Donadio M, Del Mastro L, Livi L, Natoli C, Michelotti A, Turletti A, Riccardi F, De Laurentiis M, Marchetti P, Montemurro F, Romagnoli E, De Placido S, Biganzoli L, Bologna A, Bria E, Mustacchi G. Not presented [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-04.

Background: Different studies suggest that fulvestrant 500 mg every 28 days (HD-FUL) could be an active treatment in HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients even treated with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting. The aim of this analysis is to describe the outcome of ABC patients treated with HD-FUL as first-line treatment in terms of median duration of treatment and the overall response rate in a real-world setting. Methods: For the purpose of the present analysis, we considered two data sets of HR+ ABC patients collected in Italy between 2012 and 2015 (EVA and GIM-13 AMBRA studies). Results: Eighty-one and 91 patients have been identified from the two data sets. The median age was 63 years (range 35–82) for the EVA and 57.8 years (range 35.0–82.3) for the AMBRA patients. ORRs were 23.5 and 24.3% in the whole population, 26.9% in the patients with bone only, and 21.8 and 21.4% in those with visceral metastases. The median duration of HD-FUL was 11.6 months (range 1–48) and 12.4 months (range 2.9–70.0) in the two data sets, respectively. Conclusion: These data suggest that HD-FUL should still continue to play a significant role as first-line therapy in HR+ ABC patients.

Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy is standard of care in high-risk early breast cancer patients. However, its role in HER2-positive patients is still uncertain. In this exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial, we investigated the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with or without exposure to trastuzumab. In the GIM2 trial, node-positive early breast cancer patients were randomized to receive 4 cycles of (fluorouracil)epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel administered every 2 (dose-dense) or 3 (standard-interval) weeks. After approval of adjuvant trastuzumab, protocol was amended in April 2006 to allow use of trastuzumab for 1 year after chemotherapy completion in HER2-positive patients. The efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed according to HER2 status and trastuzumab use. Out of 2,003 breast cancer patients, HER2 status was negative/unknown in 1,551 patients; among the 452 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, chemotherapy alone or followed by trastuzumab was given to 320 and 132 patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 8.1 years. No significant interaction between HER2 status, trastuzumab use and chemotherapy treatment was observed for both DFS (p=0.698) and OS (p=0.708). Nevertheless, there was no apparent benefit in the HER2-positive group treated with trastuzumab (DFS: HR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.52-1.89; OS: HR, 0.95; 95% CI 0.37-2.41). Although dose-dense chemotherapy was associated with a significant survival improvement in high-risk breast cancer patients, its benefit appeared to be smaller (if any) in patients with HER2-positive disease who received adjuvant trastuzumab. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND: The present analysis focuses on real-world data of Everolimus- Exemestane in advanced HR+ve, HER2-ve elderly breast cancer patients (aged 65 years) included in the EVA study, with unique findings in those aged 70 years. METHODS: Data are collected from clinical records and analysed according to age cut-off (< 65 years; 65 - 69 years and [greater than or equal to] 70 years). Relationship of analyzed variables with response were tested by mean of a Mantel- Haenszel chi square test. Time to event analysis was described by Kaplan Meier approach and association with baseline characteristics was analysed by stratified log-rank test and proportional hazard model. RESULTS: From July 2013 to December 2015, the EVA study enrolled overall 404 pts. 154 patients out of 404 (38,1%) were aged [greater than or equal to] 65 years, of whom 87 were [greater than or equal to] 70 years. Median duration of EVE treatment was 28.5 weeks (95% CI 19.0 - 33.8) in patients aged 65-69 years and 24,4 weeks (95% CI 19,2 - 33,2) in those aged [greater than or equal to] 70 years. Fewer patients aged 65 years received the highest EVE Dose-Intensity (> 7.5 mg/day) in comparison to younger patients (49,6% vs. 66,8%). Grade 3-4 toxicities occurred to 55 patients (35,7%), mainly stomatitis (10,9%), rash (5,8%) and non-infectious pneumonitis (NIP) (3,6%). Some toxicities, such as weight loss and anaemia were peculiarly observed in patients aged [greater than or equal to] 70 years. Five treatment-related deaths were collected (3,2%). CONCLUSIONS: EVE-EXE combination remains one of the potential treatments in HR+ patients also for elderly ones.

Frequency of CHT regimens according to biological subtypes and Setting of treatmentLuminal TumoursSettingRegimenAdj (%)1st-line (%)2nd-line (%)3rd-line (%)anthra-based (w/o Taxanes)44.27.15.19.9Anthra-Taxanes30.52.60.50CMF-like17.50.61.02.1Taxane mono/combo*6.319.314.521.5Pacliataxel + Bevacizumab020.24.33.7Platinum-based03.61.70.8Capecitabine +/- Vinorelbine019.122.217.4Eribuline002.312.4 TNBCSettingRegimenAdj (%)1st-line (%)2nd-line (%)3rd-line (%)Anthra-based (w/o Taxanes)25.73.15.116.2Anthra-Taxanes36.11.100CMF-like8.22.15.10Taxane mono/combo*6.318.417.810.8Paclitaxel + Bevacizumab024.71.70Platinum-based020.622.42.7Capecitabine +/- Vinorelbine025.720.610.8Eribuline003.429.7**Irrespectively of biological subtype, nab-paclitaxel was used in 3.6%, 15.3% and 16.4% of cases in 1st, 2nd and 3rd line, respectively BACKGROUND Breast Cancer prognosis improved in the last years due both to early diagnosis and Adj treatments. The choice of CHT regimens should consider previous Adj treatments, pattern of relapse and biological subtype. There are few information on the treatment of MBC in the clinical practice outside controlled trials, last study has been published 15 yrs ago in Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The GIM13-AMBRA Study is a multicenter longitudinal cohort study, describing the choice of first and subsequent lines of treatment for MBC in HER2-ve pts. We are collecting data of 30 consecutive pts from 42 Italian Centres who developed the first relapse in the years 2012-2015 and were treated with CHT, (+/- previous endocrine treatments (HT)) for MBC. One of the secondary aims is to evaluate the Time to Treatment Change (TTC) (time between treatment start and its change for any reason) as surrogate endpoint for Time To Progression outside clinical trials. The present report is focused on the choice of treatments in any line and TTC, according to biological subtypes. . RESULTS For the present analysis, 683 pts are evaluable. Pts with Luminal A and B tumours received CHT and HT in 65.3% (Adjuvant), 21.7% (1st line), 7.1% (2nd line) and 7% (3rd line) of the cases. The most used regimens according to tumour subtype and line of treatment are shown in Table 1. Median TTC from 1st to 2nd line was 8.1 and 17.9 months in TNBC and Luminal tumours, respectively, whereas TTC from 2nd to 3rd line was 3.1 and 12.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Preliminary results of the AMBRA-GIM13 Italian observational study confirm that in most cases treatment for MBC is strongly related to the type of the Adj regimen, being the use of anthracyclines marginal in MBC, whereas taxanes are widely used in any line. In 1st line the most used regimens are Taxane and Bevacizumab or Capecitabine/Vinorelbine combinations. The last one remains the most used CHT in 2nd and 3rd lines. No difference have been observed according to biological subtype, except for Platinum-based regimens in TNBC. HT alone remains the preferred choice in 1st and 2nd line in Luminal cases. TTC seems to be a reliable surrogate for PFS in the “real world” practice . CHT still plays a crucial role in the treatment of MBC HER2-ve pts. Citation Format: Mustacchi G, Cazzaniga ME, Biganzoli L, De Laurentiis M, Del Mastro L, De Placido S, Donadio M, Garrone O, Giordano M, Latini L, Livi L, Marchetti P, Michelotti A, Montemurro F, Natoli C, Pronzato P, Riccardi F, Turletti A. First and further line choices of treatment for HER2-VE metastatic breast cancer (MBC) according to adjuvant treatment and biological subtype. Preliminary results of the observational “GIM-13 – AMBRA” Italian study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-07.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25874.].

Background No evidence exists to recommend a specific chemotherapy regimen in young breast cancer patients. We performed a pooled analysis of two randomised clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients and its impact on the risk of treatment-induced amenorrhoea. Patients and methods In the MIG1 study, node-positive or high-risk node-negative patients were randomised to 6 cycles of fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide every 2 (dose-dense) or 3 (standard-interval) weeks. In the GIM2 study, node-positive patients were randomised to 4 cycles of dose-dense or standard-interval EC or FEC followed by 4 cycles of dose-dense or standard-interval paclitaxel. Using individual patient data, the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival by means of a Cox proportional hazards model and the odds ratio for treatment-induced amenorrhoea through a logistic regression model were calculated for each study. A meta-analysis of the two studies was performed using the random effect model to compute the parameter estimates. Results A total of 1,549 patients were included. Dose-dense chemotherapy was associated with a significant improved overall survival as compared to standard-interval chemotherapy (HR, 0.71; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.54–0.95; p = 0.021). The pooled HRs were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.54–1.12) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.40–1.06) for patients with hormone receptor-positive and -negative tumours, respectively (interaction p = 0.330). No increased risk of treatment-induced amenorrhoea was observed with dose-dense chemotherapy (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.80–1.25; p = 0.989). Conclusion Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered the preferred treatment option in high-risk premenopausal breast cancer patients.

The present analysis focuses on real-world data of Everolimus-Exemestane in advanced HR+ve, HER2-ve elderly breast cancer patients (aged 65 years) included in the EVA study, with unique findings in those aged 70 years.Data are collected from clinical records and analysed according to age cut-off (65 years; 65 - 69 years and {greater than or equal to} 70 years). Relationship of analyzed variables with response were tested by mean of a Mantel-Haenszel chi square test. Time to event analysis was described by Kaplan Meier approach and association with baseline characteristics was analysed by stratified log-rank test and proportional hazard model.From July 2013 to December 2015, the EVA study enrolled overall 404 pts. 154 patients out of 404 (38,1%) were aged {greater than or equal to} 65 years, of whom 87 were {greater than or equal to} 70 years. Median duration of EVE treatment was 28.5 weeks (95% CI 19.0 - 33.8) in patients aged 65-69 years and 24,4 weeks (95% CI 19,2 - 33,2) in those aged {greater than or equal to} 70 years. Fewer patients aged 65 years received the highest EVE Dose-Intensity (7.5 mg/day) in comparison to younger patients (49,6% vs. 66,8%). Grade 3-4 toxicities occurred to 55 patients (35,7%), mainly stomatitis (10,9%), rash (5,8%) and non-infectious pneumonitis (NIP) (3,6%). Some toxicities, such as weight loss and anaemia were peculiarly observed in patients aged {greater than or equal to} 70 years. Five treatment-related deaths were collected (3,2%).EVE-EXE combination remains one of the potential treatments in HR+ patients also for elderly ones.

Background Tumor phenotype may change during breast cancer (BC) progression and discordance between primary and metastases ranges between 16% and 21% for Hormone Receptor (HR) expression in some series. The impact of this change on patient (pts) management and outcome is not yet clear, even though preliminary data indicate that the molecular characterization of recurrent breast cancer may induce clinicians to modify the treatment choice in ∼14% of the cases and that a change in the receptor status is associated with poorer survival. This analysis evaluates the prognostic impact of receptor discordance between paired primaries and recurrences. Methods We used data of 879 pts of the longitudinal cohort AMBRA study, identifying 3 different groups: Group A: HR+ BC remaining HR+ at relapse; Group BHR+ BC becoming TNBC; Group C:TNBC remaining TNBC. Change in HR status was evaluated on the biopsy done at the moment of relapse. Time to event was evaluated by Cox-Mantel Hazard Ratio and Logrank Test; Mean/median by Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test. Results Pts who underwent biopsy at the time of relapse were 545/879 (62%), of those 462 (84.4%) were classified as Luminal tumors and 83 (15.2%) TNBC on primary. Change in tumor phenotype occurred in 31 (6.7%) of Luminal BC and 16 (19.3%) TNBC, probably due to a higher genomic instability (p = 0.021). Median DFS between Luminal BC was not different: HR+aHR+: 74.56 months (95%CI 66.8-82.1) vs HR+aTNBC: 89.73 months (95%CI:44.73-103.46). Table summarizes main data in time to event in the 3 identified groups. *PFS at 1strelapse; **PFS at 2nd relapse; ***Time to Treatment Change at 1strelapse; °OS at 1strelapse; §OS from 1stPD. Table . 325P HR+/HR + (range) Group A HR+/TNBC (range) Group B p value Group A vs C TNBC/TNBC (range) Group C PFS1* (months) 13.65 (0,77-162,03) 9.45 (3,97-52,73) 0.36 8.13 (6.3-10.9) PFS2** (months) 6.83 (0,00-57,13) 6.12 (2,67-26,30) 0.84 4.20 (0,33-22,17) TTC1*** (months) 12.43 (0,13-163,10) 8.88 (0,00-48,40) 0.50 7.88 (0,23-27,80) TTC2**** (months) 7.45 (0,00-55,97) 6.73 (3,77-26,80) na na OS1° (months) 23.1 (20-26) 15 (8.7-26.3) 0.031 3.60 (0,60-25,38) OS (years) 8.52 (0,26-115,92) 7.86 (0,19-30,67) 0.43 3.58 (2.91-2.39) OS from PD1§ (months) 25.8 (0,00-207,53) 17.23 (2,67-104,30) 0.82 17.90 (2,37-53,57) Conclusions Change in tumor phenotype has a significant impact on OS; BC pts who become TNBC at relapse should be treated in the same way as TNBC pts at diagnosis. Anyway, OS of Luminal BC who change phenotype seems to be better than TNBC. Legal entity responsible for the study GIM - Gruppo Italiano Mammella. Funding Celgene. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

e12528 Background: Pts with ABC have a diverse clinical course and OS rates vary significantly among pts. New strategies had potentially changed the natural history of these pts, however data from clinical studies are still lacking and Real-World Studies (RWS) are crucial in clinical outcome evaluation. Methods: AMBRA is a longitudinal cohort study, aiming to describe the choice of first and subsequent lines of treatment in HER2-ve ABC pts receiving at least one CHT (SABCS 2016, P5-15-07 & P5-14-09) in the years 2012-2015. The present analysis is focused on the description of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and OS according to the biologic subtype in the deceased population. So far, 791/1500 pts have been registered into the study and 255 (32.2%) are evaluable. Time to event analysis between subtypes was evaluated by Cox-Mantel Hazard Ratio and Logrank Test. DFS by Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test. Results: Pts distribution according to molecular subtype was: Luminal A (86, 33.7%), Luminal B (107 (42.1%), TNBC (62, 24.3%). Median ages at diagnosis were 55.8, 52.9 and 55.1 years for the 3 subgroups, respectively. Mean DFS was significantly different according to the molecular subtypes: 87.28, 61.37 and 23.9 months. The difference between Luminal B and TNBC is statistically significant as well. Mean PFS of first-line therapy was 17.9 11.7 and 7.8 months respectively. Mean OS from first progression was 32.9 24.2 and 15.8 months respectively. Statistical details. Conclusions: Our data confirm in a RWS the different biological behaviour between Lum A and B. Metastatic life span is quite good for Luminal and disappointing for TNBC. Median time from last CHT and Death is quite short and similar.[Table: see text]

e13032Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) is the initial therapy for HR+ patients. Primary endocrine resistance (PER) is defined as a relapse while on the first 2 years of adjuvant ET, or PD within ...

e13078Background: Two randomized studies demonstrated that Nab-P produces a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR), longer Time to Progression (TTP) and greater overall survival (OS) in A...

e13076Background: mCHT is the minimum biologically effective dose of a CHT agent, given at regular dosing regimen with no prolonged drug free interval. Aim of this observational retrospective study...

e12561 Background: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an incurable disease. The main goals of treatment are palliation, symptoms control, preserving QoL and prolonging survival. New drugs have contributed to ameliorate the outcome of MBC patients (pts) by increasing response rates (RR) progression free survival (PFS) and, in some setting, overall survival (OS). Taxanes are the most effective drugs in the management of MBC. Nab-Paclitaxel (Nab-P), a solvent-free albumin-bound taxane with high tumor retention, showed antitumor efficacy, and limited toxicity in MBC pts. Aim of the present study is to evaluate the activity and safety of Nab-P in clinical practice. Methods: MANTEL is a retrospective, multicenter, observational study, designed to collect biological and clinical data of MBC treated with Nab-P, from its availability in Italy. Objectives of the study are PFS, correlation between response and tumor biological characteristics and safety. Results: Up to date 137 cases were collected from 9 centers. Main patients’ characteristics were: median age 58 y (32-82) including 40 pts over 65, median ECOG PS 0 (0-2), ER/PgR positive 118 pts (86.1%), Triple Negative 11 pts (8%), most common metastatic sites: bone 100 pts (73%), liver 77 pts (56.2%), soft-tissues 72 pts (52.5%), lung 38 pts (27.7%), CNS 7 (5.1%) median number of organs involved: 2 (1-5), median number of previous chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease: 2 (0-9). Preliminary results were: 4 CR (3%), 34 PR (24.8), 35 SD (25.5%), 54 PD (39.4%) and 10 NE (7.3%), CB was observed in 52 pts (37.9%). Median number of cycles administered was 5 (1-15). Six pts are still on treatment. Median PFS is 4.2+ months (0.3+ - 34). G3-4 leucopenia and neutropenia were observed in 6 (4.3%) and 11 pts (8%) respectively, anemia (all grades) in 51 pts (37.2%). 65 pts (47.4%) experienced neuropathy (G3 in 6 pts), 87 (63.5%) fatigue (G3 in 4) and 20 pts (14.6%) G1-2 arthro-myalgia. 99 pts (72.2%) received standard every 3-weeks schedule. 34 pts (24.8%) required dose reduction due to toxicity. Conclusions: Nab-P is feasible in unselected MBC pts. No concerns about toxicity in this real life population including large number of elderly and heavily pretreated pts. The study is ongoing.

1057 Background: ESO/ESMO recently developed consensus guidelines for MBC treatment, potentially applicable worldwide. Aim of the present analysis is to verify the adherence to ABC recommendations for HR+ve MBC in the context of the AMBRA study. Methods: AMBRA is a longitudinal cohort study, aiming to describe the choice of first and subsequent lines of treatment in HER2-ve MBC pts receiving at least one Chemotherapy (CHT) (SABCS 2016, P5-15-07 & P5-14-09). For the present analysis, we selected 6 statements from the ABC1 & ABC2 Conferences, comparing them with the clinical choices of 1st-line therapy in all evaluable cases. Results: So far, 791/1500 pts have been registered into the study, 673 of them (85%) with HR+ MBC. Main characteristics are: N+=422 (62.2%), adjuvant chemotherapy=288 (42.4%), median DFI=70 months. 26 pts were excluded due to change into HR-ve (26; 3.8%). Endocrine Therapy (ET) was the 1st-line of treatment in 187/647 (27.8%), CHT in 310 (47.9%) and CHT followed by ET in 135 (20.8%). Viscera was the main site of disease in 328 pts (48.7%): 56 (17%) received ET, 209 (63.7%) CHT alone, the remaining CHT followed by ET. Median DFI was similar in all the 3 groups. Selected recommendations and percentages of adherence are reported in the table below. Conclusions: The adherence to clinical recommendation about the use of ET as 1st-line treatment in HR+ pts is very low; a potential bias could be due to the selection of the study population. Visceral disease appears to be often a key factor for selecting CHT as 1st-line treatment. In pts receiving ET, the recommendation to use AIs, TAM or F is transposed in almost all the cases. [Table: see text]

1055 Background: The molecular subtypes of BC have individual patterns of behavior, prognosis and sensitivity to treatment, with subsequent implications for the choice of, or indeed role, for adjuvant (Adj) and metastatic chemotherapy (CHT). Taxanes (T) play a central role in chemotherapy for BC. However, previous studies have reported that T are relatively ineffective in patients with Luminal (HR+ve) BC compared with other subtypes. Aim of the present analysis is to describe the use of T in the clinical practice in Italy in HR+ve pts. Methods: AMBRA is a longitudinal cohort study, aiming to describe the choice of first and subsequent lines of treatment in HER2-ve MBC pts receiving at least one CHT (SABCS 2016, P5-15-07 & P5-14-09) in the years 2012-2015. For the present analysis, we focused on the use of T from the AdJ to the metastatic setting. Results: So far, 791/1500 pts have been registered into the study, 651 of them (82,3%) evaluable with HR+ MBC. Main characteristics are: Mean age 52 years; pN: UK 64 (9.8%) N+=405 (62.2%); Adj CHT=397 (61 %), mean DFI=96,99 months. T were used in 60.3% of the cases in the Adj setting, alone or in combination with other drugs, mainly anthracyclines (82.6%), with a mean DFI of 56.9 months. In the metastatic setting, across 1st to 3rd line, 460 pts (70.6%) received T, alone (49.7%) or in combination with Bevacizumab (38.2%), or other CHT drugs (11.9%). Details of the use of T in MBC are described in the table below. Conclusions: T have been used in more than 60% of cases of Luminal tumours in the Adj setting. In this population DFS is significantly shorter as compared with the non-T treated luminal population, as previously suggested by different Authors. Re-challenge with T is very frequent across different lines for MBC. Paclitaxel is the most used T, Docetaxel the less used and Nab-paclitaxel, labelled for MBC only, shows an increasing use from 1st-to 3rd line of treatment. [Table: see text]

501 Background: 1-year trastuzumab with chemotherapy is the standard adjuvant treatment for HER2+ breast cancer patients (pts). The efficacy of less extended trastuzumab exposure is still under investigation. The Short-HER study is an independent, non-profit study aimed to test the non-inferiority of 9 weeks vs 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab. Methods: This is a phase III, multicenter, Italian trial where pts with HER2+ breast cancer were randomly assigned to: Arm A (Long) AC or ECx4 followed by 4 courses of 3-weekly docetaxel in combination with trastuzumab, followed by 14 additional courses of 3-weekly trastuzumab; or Arm B (Short) 3 courses of 3-weekly docetaxel plus weekly trastuzumab for 9 doses followed by FEC x3. When indicated, radiation therapy was administered after the completion of chemotherapy. Hormonal therapy started at the completion of chemotherapy for pts with hormone receptor positive tumors. This is a non-inferiority trial with disease-free survival (DFS) as primary end-point.Overall survival (OS) is evaluated as second primary analysis outcome. The sample size of 1250 pts has been estimated based on a hazard ratio =4. Sixty-eight% of the pts had ER+ tumors. Characteristics were balanced between the two arms. At the time of this writing, 95% of the planned DFS events have been reported. 105 Grade ≥2 cardiac events have been reported, 78 in arm A (long) and 27 in arm B (short). Grade 3-4 cardiac events were 20 in arm A and 11 in arm B. Conclusions: Shorter trastuzumab administration almost halves the rate of severe cardiac toxicity. Final DFS data will be available at the time of the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT00629278.

1049 Background: The appropriate choice of 1st-line therapy in HR+ve/HER2-ve MBC pts is becoming more complicated since the data of front-line Fulvestrant and CDK 4/6 Inhibitors have been released. In the absence of predictive biomarkers of tumor response, one possible option is the recently proposed “composite score” (Schmid, ESMO 2016), composed by visceral tumor burden (VTB) and Disease-Free-Interval (DFI) to identify risk categories and the probability of response to ET or chemotherapy (CHT). Aim of the present analysis is to describe the choices of 1st-line treatment and the response rate, according to the mentioned score in a population of HR+/HER2-ve MBC. Methods: We used data of the HR+ve pts of the AMBRA study, a longitudinal cohort study, describing the choice of first and subsequent lines of treatment in HER2-ve MBC pts (SABCS 2016 P5-15-07 & P5-14-09). Using median DFI and VTB three categories of risk have been identified: Low (DFI > 24 months & VTB-), Intermediate (DFI £ 24 months & VTB- or DFI > 24 months & VTB+) and High (DFI £ 24 months & VTB+). This analysis describes the choices of 1st-line therapy and relative response rate according to these risk categories. Results: So far, 791/1500 pts have been registered into the AMBRA study, 673 of them (85%) with HR+ MBC and 659 (83.3%) are evaluable for this analysis. Risk categories and response to therapy are detailed in the table below. Conclusions: No conclusion can be done regarding the “High Risk” group because of the low number of pts treated with ET alone. Regarding the “Low” and “Intermediate” risk categories, we can conclude that the proposed “composite risk score” doesn’t seem to discriminate MBC patients who could be treated with ET alone or with a more aggressive treatment, at least in terms of response rate. [Table: see text]

Background. Using a 2 × 2 factorial design, we compared the efficacy of two different schedules of chemotherapy (CT), dose-dense (DD) every 2 weeks versus standard duration every 3 weeks and the role of Fluorouracil (F) in addition to EC, in the adjuvant treatment of node positive BC pts. Patients and Methods. Node positive early BC pts younger than 70 years were eligible and randomly assigned to one of the following treatment arms: ARM A (4 courses of EC [90/600 mg/m2, on day 1, q 21] followed by 4 courses of T [175 mg/m2 on day 1, q 21]); ARM B (4 courses of FEC [600/90/600 mg/m2, on day 1, q 21] followed by 4 courses of T [175 mg/m2 on day 1, q 21]); ARM C (4 courses of EC [90/600 mg/m2, on day 1, q 14] followed by 4 courses of T [175 mg/m2 on day 1, q 14]); ARM D (4 courses of FEC [600/90/600 mg/m2, on day 1, q 14] followed by 4 courses of T [175 mg/m2 on day 1, q 14]). Pts enrolled in the DD arms (ARM C and D) received subcutaneous pegfilgrastim (6 mg) 24 hours after CT. HER2-positive pts enrolled after April 2006 received trastuzumab for 1 year at the end of CT. The primary study endpoint was disease free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. All analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results. From April 2003 to July 2006, 2091 pts were enrolled (545 in ARM A, 544 in ARM B, 502 in ARM C, 500 in ARM D). The planned number of CT cycles was completed in 89% of pts in the DD group and in 88.1% of pts in the standard duration group. Pts treated with DD CT (ARM C + ARM D) experienced more frequently anemia (all grades: 67.2% vs 49.5%, p < .0001; G3-G4: 0.2% vs 1.4%, p = .004) and bone pain (53.5% vs 39.2%, p < .0001). Neutropenia occurred more frequently in standard duration arms (ARM A + ARM B): 66.7% vs 28.0%, p = < .0001. At a median follow up of 7.0 years, multivariate analysis, showed that DD treatments (ARM C + ARM D vs ARM A + ARM B) improved the primary endpoint, DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78; 95% CI 0.66-0.94; p = .007), and OS (HR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.87; p = .002). Conversely, the addition of F to EC did not improve clinical outcomes: the HR for DFS and OS (ARM A + ARM C vs ARM B + ARM D) were respectively 0.98 (95% CI 0.83-1.17; p = .85) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.73-1.19; p = .578). Subgroup analyses revealed that the benefits associated with DD CT were independent of hormone receptor status: in hormone receptor positive the HRs for DFS and OS were 0.80 (0.65-0.98) and 0.69 (0.51-0.93) respectively; in hormone receptor negative the HRs for DFS and OS were 0.67 (0.47-0.95) and 0.57 (0.36-0.92) respectively (p for interaction for DFS: 0.339; p for interaction for OS: 0.495). Pathological tumor size, nodal status (1-3 vs ≥ 4 positive nodes), histological grade and hormone receptor status were independently associate with DFS and OS. Conclusions. DD CT as adjuvant treatment in node positive BC pts, improves DFS and OS significantly. Conversely, the addition of F to EC does not improve clinical outcomes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433420). Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr S5-06.