Search

Background Pathological N2 (pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is diverse; its treatment depends on the clinical N (cN) status. We aimed to determine the efficacy of upfront surgery for cN2pN2 NSCLC. Methods The study included 43 cN2pN2 NSCLC patients who underwent upfront surgery at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between 2002 and 2017. Survival outcome, focusing on cN2 status, was retrospectively investigated. Mediastinal lymph nodes were pre-operatively evaluated using computed tomography and positron emission tomography. Surgical eligibility criteria included single-station cN2. N2 with N1 and skip N2 were defined as N2 with and without ipsilateral hilar lymph node metastasis, respectively. A platinum-doublet regimen was used for adjuvant chemotherapy. Survival curves were analysed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results Clinical-skip N2 and cN2 with N1 cases included 22 and 21 patients, respectively. Twenty-three patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up duration was 73 months. Clinical-skip N2 had a significantly better 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) than cN2 with N1 (58.3 vs 28.6%, P = 0.038) and was an independent favorable RFS predictor. Recurrence within 18 months occurred in 71% of cN2 with N1 cases. Five-year overall survival and RFS rates in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy vs those without adjuvant chemotherapy were 82.2 vs 41.9% (P = 0.019) and 56.5 vs 28.0% (P = 0.049), respectively. Conclusions Clinical-skip N2 had an excellent prognosis, and upfront surgery was acceptable. Conversely, upfront surgery followed by chemotherapy is not recommended for cN2 with N1 patients because of early recurrence.

Since the overall survival (OS) of patients enrolled in the first clinical phase III trial (WJOG5108L) was not recorded owing to time constraints, the present study (WJOG5108LFS) with a longer follow-up (66.6 months) aimed to compare OS of those treated with erlotinib (ER) and gefitinib (GE) for lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation.Among 536 enrolled patients, 362 (67.5%) were EGFR mutation-positive, including 182 in the ER arm and 180 in the GE arm. Median survival time (MST) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. OS and PFS were determined for patients with EGFR mutation.MSTs of ER (n = 182) and GE arms (n = 180) were 31.97 and 27.98 months, respectively (P = 0.3573, hazard ratio = 1.116). MSTs of exon 19 mutation patients in ER (n = 99) and GE arms (n = 89) were 37.49 and 28.91 months, respectively (P = 0.3791). MSTs of L858 mutation patients in ER (n = 82) and GE arms (n = 89) were 22.98 and 27.79 months, respectively (P = 0.7836). In patients with brain metastasis harboring mutation, response rates were 32.8% and 22.2% (P = 0.160), MSTs were 23.46 and 23.89 months (P = 0.7410), and PFS were 9.49 and 6.98 months (P = 0.1481) in the ER (n = 67) and GE arms (n = 72), respectively.No significant differences in OS were observed between the ER and GE arms in all patients with EGFR mutation and those with brain metastasis harboring EGFR mutation.

For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, the initial therapeutic interventions will have crucial impacts on their clinical outcomes. Drug tolerant factors reportedly have an impact on EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitivity. This prospective study investigated the impacts of drug tolerant-related protein expression in tumors based on the efficacy of osimertinib in the first-setting of EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients. A total of 92 patients with EGFR-mutated advanced or postoperative recurrent NSCLC were analyzed and treated with osimertinib at 14 institutions in Japan. AXL, p53, and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patient tumors was determined using immunohistochemistry. The AXL signaling pathway was investigated using a cell line-based assay and AXL-related gene expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. High levels of AXL and positive-p53 expression were detected in 26.1% and 53.3% of the pretreatment EGFR-mutated NSCLC tumors, respectively. High AXL expression levels were significantly associated with a shorter progression-free survival compared with low AXL expression levels, irrespective of the EGFR activating mutation status (p = 0.026). Cell line-based assays indicated that the overexpression of AXL protein accelerated PD-L1 expression, which induced insensitivity to osimertinib. In the TCGA database, AXL RNA levels were positively correlated with PD-L1 expression in the lung adenocarcinoma cohort. The results show that high AXL expression levels in tumors impact clinical predictions when using osimertinib to treat EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Trial Registration: UMIN000043942.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab for previously untreated patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations.We conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study at 21 institutions in Japan. Previously untreated patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations received either osimertinib (80 mg, daily) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, every 3 wk) or osimertinib monotherapy, and were stratified according to sex, stage, and EGFR mutation status. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population, assessed by means of blinded, independent central radiologic review.Between January 2018 and September 2018, a total of 122 patients were enrolled (osimertinib + bevacizumab arm, 61 patients; osimertinib monotherapy arm, 61 patients). At a median follow-up duration of 19.8 months, the median PFS was 22.1 months for osimertinib plus bevacizumab and 20.2 months for osimertinib monotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.862 (60% confidence interval: 0.700-1.060, 95% confidence interval: 0.531-1.397, one-sided stratified log-rank p = 0.213). Adverse events of grade 3 or worse were observed in 34 patients (56%) in the osimertinib plus bevacizumab arm and 29 (48%) in the osimertinib monotherapy arm. In addition, two (3%) and 11 patients (18%) experienced any grade pneumonitis, respectively, and grade 3 pneumonitis was observed in one patient (2%) in each arm.This study failed to exhibit the efficacy of osimertinib plus bevacizumab for improving the PFS among patients with nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations as first-line treatment.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.In the longest follow-up, to our knowledge, for a KRASG12C inhibitor, we assessed the long-term efficacy, safety, and biomarkers of sotorasib in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the CodeBreaK 100 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03600883). This multicenter, single-group, open-label phase I/phase II trial enrolled 174 patients with KRAS G12C-mutated, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after progression on prior therapies. Patients (N = 174) received sotorasib 960 mg once daily with the primary end points for phase I of safety and tolerability and for phase II of objective response rate (ORR). Sotorasib produced an ORR of 41%, median duration of response of 12.3 months, progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.3 months, overall survival (OS) of 12.5 months, and 2-year OS rate of 33%. Long-term clinical benefit (PFS ≥ 12 months) was observed in 40 (23%) patients across PD-L1 expression levels, in a proportion of patients with somatic STK11 and/or KEAP1 alterations, and was associated with lower baseline circulating tumor DNA levels. Sotorasib was well tolerated, with few late-onset treatment-related toxicities, none of which led to treatment discontinuation. These results demonstrate the long-term benefit of sotorasib, including in subgroups with poor prognosis. ispartof: J Clin Oncol vol:41 issue:18 pages:3311-3317 ispartof: location:United States status: published

Previous studies have shown the potentials of anti-angiogenesis inhibitors in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This single-institutional phase 1b study aimed to determine the recommended dose of ramucirumab (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody) in combination with irinotecan plus cisplatin for extensive-stage SCLC.Chemo-naïve patients with extensive-stage SCLC were enrolled and received ramucirumab (day 1 and 15) with irinotecan (60 mg/mThe first 3 patients that received irinotecan plus cisplatin with ramucirumab 10 mg/kg did not experience dose-limiting toxicities. Thus, the recommended dose of ramucirumab was set at 10 mg/kg, and 10 patients received this dose. The objective response rate was 100% (95% CI, 69-100%), with a median progression-free survival of 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.3-9.0) and median overall survival of 22.4 months (95% CI, 12.1-not reached). Grade 3 neutropenia and hypertension were observed in 4 and 2 patients, respectively. No ramucirumab-related deaths were noted; hypertension and bleeding events were observed in 5 and 6 patients, respectively.This study showed the satisfactory tolerability and efficacy of ramucirumab at 10 mg/kg in combination with irinotecan plus cisplatin in chemo-naïve patients with extensive-stage SCLC.

PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy of gefitinib as an adjuvant therapy for non–small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS IMPACT (WJOG6410L; University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000006252 ), a randomized, open-label, phase III study, included patients with completely resected pathologic stage II-III non–small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R) during September 2011 to December 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib (250 mg once daily) for 24 months or cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; cis/vin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Overall, 234 patients were randomly assigned. Among 232 eligible patients (116 each; excluding two who withdrew consent), the median DFS was 35.9 and 25.1 months in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. However, Kaplan-Meier curves crossed around 4 years after surgery with no statistically significant difference (stratified log-rank P = .63; hazard ratio by stratified Cox proportional hazards model = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.28). Overall survival (OS) was also not different (stratified log-rank P = .89; hazard ratio = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.65), with the 5-year OS rates being 78.0% and 74.6% in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 0 and three patients in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. CONCLUSION Although adjuvant gefitinib appeared to prevent early relapse, it did not prolong DFS or OS. However, similar DFS and OS may justify adjuvant gefitinib in the selected patient subsets, especially those deemed ineligible for platinum-doublet adjuvant therapy; however, this was not a noninferiority trial.

The mutation status of tumor tissue DNA (n = 389) of resected stage II‐III non‐squamous non–small‐cell lung cancer (Ns‐NSCLC) was analyzed using targeted deep sequencing as an exploratory biomarker study (JIPANG‐TR) for the JIPANG study, a randomized phase III study of pemetrexed/cisplatin (Pem/Cis) vs vinorelbine/cisplatin (Vnr/Cis). The TP53 mutation, common EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion and L858R), and KRAS mutations were frequently detected. The frequency of the EGFR mutation was significant among female patients. Patients with an EGFR mutation‐positive status had a significantly shorter recurrence‐free survival (RFS) time (24 mo vs not reached) (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.22‐2.21; P = .0011 for EGFR mutation status). Multivariable analysis identified both the pathological stage and EGFR mutation status as independent prognostic factors for RFS (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.30‐2.44; P = .0003 for disease stage; and HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.15‐2.16; P = .0050 for EGFR mutation status). This study demonstrated that the EGFR mutation has either a poor prognostic or predictive impact on a poor response to postoperative chemotherapy with platinum doublet chemotherapy for stage II‐III Ns‐NSCLC patients. This result supports a role for mandatory molecular diagnosis of early‐stage Ns‐NSCLC for precision oncology and signifies the importance of adjuvant for the 3rd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor rather than platinum‐based chemotherapy. This study is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN 000012237)., Mutation status of stage II‐III Ns‐NSCLC (n = 389) was analyzed using targeted deep sequencing. Patients with an EGFR mutation‐positive status had a significantly shorter recurrence‐free survival (RFS). Both the pathological stage and EGFR mutation status were independent prognostic factors for RFS.

This prespecified subanalysis of the global, randomized controlled phase III KEYNOTE‐024 study of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or higher evaluated clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in Japan. Treatment consisted of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (35 cycles) or platinum‐based chemotherapy (four to six cycles). The primary end‐point was progression‐free survival; secondary end‐points included overall survival and safety. Of 305 patients randomized in KEYNOTE‐024 overall, 40 patients were enrolled in Japan (all received treatment: pembrolizumab, n = 21; chemotherapy, n = 19). Median progression‐free survival was 41.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2‐42.5) months with pembrolizumab and 4.1 (95% CI, 2.8‐8.3) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27 [95% CI, 0.11‐0.65]; one‐sided, nominal P = .001). Median overall survival was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 22.9‒NR) and 21.5 (95% CI, 5.2‐35.0) months, respectively (HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.17‐0.91]; one‐sided, nominal P = .012). Treatment‐related adverse events occurred in 21/21 (100%) pembrolizumab‐treated and 18/19 (95%) chemotherapy‐treated patients; eight patients (38%) and nine patients (47%), respectively, had grade 3‐5 events. Immune‐mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 11 pembrolizumab‐treated patients (52%) and four chemotherapy‐treated patients (21%), respectively; four patients (19%) and one patient (5%), respectively, had grade 3‐5 events. Consistent with results from KEYNOTE‐024 overall, first‐line pembrolizumab improved progression‐free survival and overall survival vs chemotherapy with manageable safety among Japanese patients with metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a PD‐L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or higher. The trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02142738., This prespecified subanalysis of the global, randomized controlled phase III KEYNOTE‐024 study of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic non‐small‐cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a PD‐L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or higher evaluated clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in Japan. Consistent with results from KEYNOTE‐024 overall, first‐line pembrolizumab improved progression‐free survival and overall survival vs chemotherapy with manageable safety among 40 Japanese patients in the study.

Introduction: In patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), long-term survival data have not been fully evaluated. Moreover, the association between long-term prognosis and prognostic factors has not been sufficiently investigated. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy of CCRT in 120 patients with LD-SCLC with a plan for curative CRT using concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Results: The patients had a median age of 65.5 years, predominantly male (73%), and had clinical stage III disease (80%). The median follow-up time for overall survival (OS) was 72.2 months, median OS was 42.5 months, and the 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 52.4% and 41.8%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.5 months, and the 3-year and 5-year PFS rates were 37.6% and 33.6%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates of patients who achieved PFS at each time point were 70.9%, 83.6%, and 91.9% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. The gradual increase in the 5-year OS rate following PFS extension and initial depression of the Kaplan–Meier curve showed disease progression frequently occurred in the first 2 years after initiation of CCRT. The Cox proportional hazards model showed no significant factors correlated with long-term survival through univariate and multivariate analyses. Although the prognostic factors associated with long-term prognosis in LD-SCLC were not identified, the 5-year survival rate was 41.8%, and among patients without disease progression at 2 years, the 5-year survival rate was 83.6%. Conclusion: These data suggested that the prognosis of patients with LD-SCLC was improving.

Few clinical studies have been designed for elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the tolerability of carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC. The eligibility criteria were: unresectable stage III NSCLC, performance status 0 or 1, and age ≥ 75 years. Eligible patients received 6 weeks of weekly carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy with a total dose of 64 Gy in 32 fractions. Carboplatin was fixed to an area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) of 2 mg/mL/min, and the recommended dose of nab-paclitaxel was evaluated using a dose-escalation study (30 or 40 mg/m2). Tolerability at the recommended dose was evaluated in an expansion study. Nineteen patients were enrolled at four institutions, all of whom were eligible and assessable. The recommended nab-paclitaxel dose was set at 30 mg/m2 because two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity at 40 mg/m2. The treatment completion rate of the 17 patients analyzed at the recommended dose was 100% (80% confidence interval (CI), 83.8–100%). The overall response rate was 76.5%, and the median progression free survival was 13.4 months (95% CI, 4.2–21.4 months). Common grade 3 and 4 toxicities included leukopenia (23.5%), neutropenia (17.6%), anemia (5.9%), and infection (5.9%). One treatment-related death due to pneumonitis was observed six months after the end of the study. In conclusion, carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy show good tolerability and exhibit promising efficacy in elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC. This trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on March 11, 2019 (trial no. jRCTs042180077).

Background Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) are currently the primary treatment option for patients with EGFR‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the effect of EGFR‐TKIs are eventually weakened due to resistance, and there is also a differential efficacy based on EGFR mutation subtypes. The combination of angiogenesis inhibitor (AI) with EGFR‐TKI has shown better efficacy than EGFR‐TKI monotherapy, regardless of the mutation subtypes. Nevertheless, the effect of AI eligibility on overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) remains to be elucidated. Thus, we assessed this impact on patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation. Methods In this study, the data for 450 patients with EGFR‐mutant NSCLC, who were treated with EGFR‐TKI monotherapy, were retrospectively analyzed for AI eligibility. The patients were categorized into AI‐eligible (AI fit) and ineligible groups (AI unfit). Results The median PFS of the AI fit group was 12.9 months, compared to 9.6 months in the unfit group (p = 0.007), and OS was also significantly longer in the AI fit group (median OS = 33.0 months) compared to that in the unfit group (18.5 months, p, We assessed the impact of angiogenesis inhibitor (AI) eligibility on epidermal growth factor receptor mutant non‐small cell lung cancer. AI eligibility was associated with longer progression‐free survival and overall survival. Selection bias may affect previous data on the efficacy of AI combination therapy.

Background Osimertinib monotherapy is currently the standard of care as a first-line treatment for patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations; however, some EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients exhibit primary resistance and an insufficient response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Elevated programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumors was reported as a negative predictive factor for outcomes of first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Methods We prospectively assessed advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations who were treated with osimertinib at 14 institutions in Japan between September 2019 and December 2020. Relationships between outcomes of osimertinib monotherapy and patients' characteristics were reviewed. Results Seventy-one patients who underwent the tumor PD-L1 test were enrolled. Multivariate analysis identified tumor PD-L1 expression as an independent predictor for progression-free survival (PFS) with osimertinib treatment (P=0.029). The objective-response and disease-control rates for osimertinib treatment were significantly lower in patients demonstrating elevated PD-L1 levels relative to those with low or negative PD-L1 level (P=0.043 and P=0.007, respectively). Furthermore, among patients treated with osimertinib, those with high PD-L1 levels exhibited shorter PFS relative to those with low plus negative PD-L1 level (median PFS: 5.0 vs. 17.4 months; P Conclusions Elevated tumor PD-L1 expression is associated with poor outcomes of osimertinib monotherapy in previously untreated advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. Further clinical trials are warranted to accumulate evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of combination therapy with osimertinib for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients with elevated tumor PD-L1 expression. Trial registration UMIN000043942.

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has recently been established as a standard treatment option for chemotherapy-naive patients with EGFR mutation-positive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only about one-half of patients who have received prior treatment with a first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI are eligible for osimertinib therapy because its indication in the second-line setting is limited to metastatic NSCLC positive for the T790M resistance mutation of EGFR. The dose-escalation part of a study in which patients received osimertinib at doses of 20 to 240 mg once daily after the development of resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs revealed a response rate of 21% and a median progression-free survival of 2.8 months for individuals whose tumors were negative for EGFR T790M. We have now designed a phase II study of osimertinib for patients with EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC who develop isolated central nervous system progression (T790M-negative or unknown) after first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI therapy (cohort 1) or who develop systemic disease progression (T790M-negative) after first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI therapy and platinum-based chemotherapy (cohort 2). A total of 70 patients (cohort 1, n = 17; cohort 2, n = 53) will be enrolled in this study, which originated from a suggestion of a dedicated network for patients with lung cancer in Japan.

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy (ICI + Chemo) is the standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impact of tumour burden on the efficacy of ICI + Chemo remains unknown.We retrospectively evaluated 92 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI + Chemo. Tumour burden was assessed as the sum of the longest diameter of the target lesion (BSLD) and number of metastatic lesions (BNMLs). We categorised the patients into three groups based on the combined BSLD and BNML values.Sixty-eight patients (74%) had progressive disease or died. Forty-four patients (48%) in the low-BSLD group had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.5 months, whereas patients in the high-BSLD group had a median PFS of 4.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54, p = 0012). Twenty-five patients (27%) in the low-BNML group had a median PFS of 9.6 months, whereas patients in the high-BNML group had a median PFS of 6.5 months (HR = 0.51, p = 0.029). Low-BSLD and low-BNML were associated independently with improved PFS in multivariate analysis. Analysis of the tumour burden combined with BSLD and BNML revealed a trend towards improved PFS as the tumour burden decreased, with median PFS of 22.3, 8.7, and 3.9 months in the low- (N = 13), medium- (N = 42) and high-burden (N = 37) groups respectively.Our findings demonstrated that a high tumour burden negatively impacts the efficacy of ICI + Chemo in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently observed in patients with advanced cancer. The objective of this prospective observational study was to estimate, based on intensive screening, using computed tomography, lower‐extremity ultrasonography, and D‐dimer testing, the prevalence of VTE in patients with advanced cancer. Patients with metastatic or locally advanced cancer without anticoagulant therapy, who were planning to receive chemotherapy during 4 weeks, were eligible. Evaluations of VTE were performed at pretreatment, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the start of chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of VTE for 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included incidence of VTE (pretreatment, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the start of chemotherapy), VTE according to primary cancer site, symptomatic VTE, pulmonary thromboembolism (PE), and treatment of VTE. We enrolled 860 patients with a median age of 68 years, including 34% female and 71% lung cancer. Cumulative incidence of VTE for 24 weeks was 22.6% (95% confidence interval: 19.8%–25.5%) (194 of 860 patients). Incidence of VTE was 11.3% pretreatment, 16.8% 12 weeks, and 14.1% 24 weeks. Symptomatic VTE was observed in 4.0% and PE in 1.0% of patients. By multivariate analysis, sex, D‐dimer level, and platelet count were independent risk factors of VTE for 24 weeks. This large prospective observational study showed that cumulative incidence of VTE was high in advanced cancer patients, mainly lung cancer. Although most patients showed asymptomatic VTE, intensive screening of VTE may be considered in advanced cancer patients, especially in women with high level of D‐dimer and decreased platelet count (UMIN000015243)., In 860 patients with advanced cancer, cumulative incidence of VTE for 24 weeks was 22.6% (95% confidence interval: 19.8%–25.5%). Incidence of VTE was 11.3% pretreatment, 16.8% 12 weeks, and 14.1% 24 weeks. By multivariate analysis, sex, D‐dimer level, and platelet count were independent risk factors of VTE for 24 weeks.

The expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a biomarker for administering immune check point inhibitors in patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer. Although the consolidation therapy of durvalumab after definitive chemoradiotherapy has become the new standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer, the prevalence and prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in this population remain unclear. We retrospectively reviewed data from patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer who received definitive chemoradiotherapy at our institution between 2012 and 2017. Levels of PD-L1 were assessed using 22C3 antibody, and associations of progression-free and overall survival rates with PD-L1 statuses at a tumor proportion score cutoff of 1% were analyzed. Among the 104 patients enrolled, PD-L1 statuses were as follows: tumor proportion score

Little is known about the impact of decreased walking capacity on clinical outcomes in elderly patients with cancer. This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the impact of walking capacity on the risk of disability and hospitalization in elderly patients with advanced lung cancer. This study prospectively enrolled 60 patients aged ≥ 70 years with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) scheduled to receive first-line chemotherapy or radical radiotherapy between January 2013 and December 2014 (trial registration number: UMIN000009768). Patients were classified into the mobile or less mobile group based on the median incremental shuttle walking distance (ISWD) before initial treatment. Assessments included the Barthel index, disability-free survival time, mean cumulative lengths of hospital stay, and inpatient medical costs. The median ISWD was 290 m (interquartile range, 245–357.5 m). The mobile group (ISWD ≥ 290 m) had a longer disability-free survival time than the less mobile group (ISWD < 290 m, 24.6 months vs. 8.4 months, p < 0.05). During the first year from study entry, the mobile group had shorter cumulative lengths of hospital stay (41.3 vs. 72.9 days/person, p < 0.05) and lower inpatient medical costs (¥1.9 vs. ¥2.9 million/person, p < 0.05) than the less mobile group. Elderly NSCLC patients with adequate walking capacity showed lower risks of disability, shorter hospitalizations, and lower inpatient medical costs than patients with reduced walking capacity. Further prospective research is needed to validate these findings. The trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network as trial number UMIN000009768 on January 13, 2013. UMIN000009768

Objective: Days spent at home (DASH) near the end of life is considered an important patient-centered goal and outcome because many patients want to stay at home toward the end of life. This study aimed to estimate the individual DASH near the end of life and identify its early predictors, including muscle mass and physical function, among elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the prospective observational study (UMIN000009768) that recruited patients aged ≥ 70 years who were scheduled to undergo first-line chemotherapy because of advanced NSCLC. We measured the muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis at baseline. DASH was calculated as 30 days minus the number of days spent in hospitals, palliative care facilities, or nursing homes during the last 30 days of life. We performed linear regression analyses to evaluate the predictors of DASH. Results: Altogether, 16 women and 28 men with a median overall survival of 15.5 months (range: 2.9–58.9) were included. The median DASH in the last 30 days of life was 8 days (range: 0–30, interquartile range: 0–23). Men had longer DASH than women by 7.3 days. Patients who had good trunk muscle mass index and hand-grip strength had significantly longer DASH than those who did not (4.7 days per kg/m2 increase [P = 0.017] and 0.4 days per kg increase [P = 0.032], respectively). Conclusions: Most elderly patients with advanced NSCLC had a limited DASH near the end of life. The risk factors for reduced DASH were women, reduced muscle mass, and poor physical function at the time of diagnosis of advanced NSCLC. Our findings would encourage early discussions about end-of-life care for patients with advanced cancers with risk factors for short DASH at the time of diagnosis, and thus, improve the quality of end-of-life care.

Objectives Pembrolizumab is recommended for patients with previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥1%. The KEYNOTE-024 study described the efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with previously untreated NSCLC who had a PD-L1 TPS of at least 50 %. However, patients with untreated brain metastasis (BM) were excluded from many clinical trials. Therefore, we assessed the efficacy of pembrolizumab against BM of NSCLC with high tumor PD-L1 expression. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who received pembrolizumab as first-line treatment against NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50 % between March 2017 and September 2019. Treatment efficacy was compared between patients with (BM group) and without BM (non-BM group). In addition, the BM group was divided into patients who previously received treatment for BM before pembrolizumab (BM-T group) and those with no prior treatment for BM (BM-not T group). Results Eighty-seven patients (23 BM group and 64 non-BM group) were assessable for efficacy. No significant differences in patient characteristics were found between the BM and non-BM groups, but proportion of patients with stage IV at diagnosis was significantly higher in the BM group. Median progression-free survival (PFS) (6.5 months vs. 7.0 months) and overall survival (OS) (21.6 months vs. 24.6 months) did not significantly differ between the two groups. The response rate of BM was 70 %. The BM group was subdivided into 13 patients in the BM-T group and 10 patients in the BM-not T group. No significant differences in patient characteristics were found between the two groups, but maximum diameter of BM and proportion of patients with symptomatic BM were significantly greater in the BM-T group. PFS and OS did not significantly differ between the two groups. The median PFS of BM was 13.6 months in the BM-T group and 18.6 months in the BM-not T group. Conclusion Pembrolizumab may be effective for BM caused by previously untreated NSCLC with high PD-L1 tumor expression.

PURPOSE To verify the superiority of irinotecan plus cisplatin over etoposide plus cisplatin as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pathologic stage I-IIIA, completely resected, high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC) of the lung. METHODS This was a randomized, open-label, phase III study on patients with completely resected stage I-IIIA HGNEC of the lung. They were randomly assigned to receive either etoposide (100 mg/m2, days 1-3) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m2, day 1) or irinotecan (60 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2, day 1) up to four cycles. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS) in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180216). RESULTS Between April 2013 and October 2018, 221 patients were enrolled (etoposide plus cisplatin arm, 111 patients; irinotecan plus cisplatin arm, 110 patients). In the second interim analysis, early termination of the trial was recommended because of futility. At a median follow-up of 24.1 months, the 3-year RFS was 65.4% for etoposide plus cisplatin and 69.0% for irinotecan plus cisplatin, with a hazard ratio of 1.076 (95% CI, 0.666 to 1.738; one-sided log-rank P = .619). Grade 3-4 adverse events were more frequent in the etoposide plus cisplatin arm, with febrile neutropenia (20% of 109 patients v 4% of 107 patients) and neutropenia (97% v 36%) being the most common. Meanwhile, grade 3-4 anorexia (6% v 11%) and diarrhea (1% v 8%) were more frequently observed in the irinotecan plus cisplatin arm. CONCLUSION Irinotecan plus cisplatin is not superior to etoposide plus cisplatin for improving RFS in patients with completely resected HGNEC; thus, etoposide plus cisplatin remains the standard treatment.

Background Quantitative skeletal muscle mass loss has the potential to predict the therapeutic effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors. This study aimed to assess the impact of muscular quality on the abovementioned outcomes. Methods This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitor monotherapy between March 2016 and February 2018. High muscle quality was stipulated as a skeletal muscle density ≥41 and ≥33 Hounsfield units in patients with a body mass index (BMI), High muscle quality correlates with higher objective response rate and longer progression‐free survival duration in treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. On the other hand, there is no association between muscle quantity and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Cancer cachexia and tumor burden predict efficacies of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and chemotherapy or pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There are no predictive models that simultaneously assess cancer cachexia and tumor burden.In the present retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC who received cancer immunotherapy as first-line systemic therapy. Clinical immune predictive scores were defined according to multivariate analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).A total of 157 patients were included in the present study (75 treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors + chemotherapy; 82, pembrolizumab monotherapy). Multivariate analysis for PFS revealed that PD-L1 tumor proportion scores50%, a total target lesion diameter ≥76 mm, and cancer cachexia were independently associated with poor PFS. Multivariate analysis for OS revealed that ≥4 metastases and cancer cachexia were significantly associated with poor OS. In the immune predictive model, the median PFS was 21.7 months in the low-risk group (N = 41); 7.6 in the medium-risk group (N = 64); and 3.0 in the high-risk group (N = 47). The median OS were not reached, 22.4 and 9.1 months respectively. Our immune predictive model was significantly associated with PFS (p 0.001) and OS (p 0.001).We proposed the immune predictive model, including tumor burden and cancer cachexia, which may predict the efficacy and survival outcome of first-line immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

OBJECTIVES: Effective therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) depends on morphological and genomic classification, with comprehensive screening for guideline-recommended biomarkers critical to guide treatment. Companion diagnostics, which provide robust genotyping results, represent an important component of personalized oncology. We evaluated the clinical validity of Guardant360 CDx as a companion diagnostic for sotorasib for detection of KRAS p.G12C, an important oncogenic NSCLC driver mutation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: KRAS p.G12C was tested in NSCLC patients from CodeBreaK100 (NCT03600833) in pretreatment plasma samples using Guardant360 CDx liquid biopsy and archival tissue samples using therascreen® KRAS RGQ polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit tissue testing. Matched tissue and plasma samples were procured from other clinical trials or commercial vendors, and results were compared. Demographics and clinical characteristics and objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 126 CodeBreaK patients, 112 (88.9%) were tested for KRASp.G12C mutations with Guardant360 CDx. Among 189 patients in the extended analysis cohort, the positive and negative percent agreement (95% CI) for Guardant360 CDx plasma testing relative to therascreen® KRAS RGQ PCR kit tissue testing were 0.71 (0.62, 0.79) and 1.00 (0.95, 1.00), respectively; overall percent agreement (95% CI) was 0.82 (0.76, 0.87). TP53 co-mutations were the most common regardless of KRAS p.G12C status (KRAS p.G12C-positive, 53.4%; KRAS p.G12C-negative, 45.5%). STK11 was co-mutated in 26.1% of KRAS p.G12C-positive samples. The ORR was similar among patients selected by plasma and tissue testing. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive genotyping for all therapeutic targets including KRAS p.G12C is critical for management of NSCLC. Liquid biopsy using Guardant360 CDx has clinical validity for identification of patients with KRASp.G12C-mutant NSCLC and, augmented by tissue testing methodologies as outlined on the approved product label, will identify patients for treatment with sotorasib. ispartof: Lung Cancer vol:166 pages:270-278 ispartof: location:Ireland status: published

Adipose tissue induces inflammation, which desensitizes the efficacy of immunotherapy. However, several reports show that the therapeutic effect of programed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor(s) monotherapy is significantly better in obese patients. Therefore, the effect of adipose tissue on immunotherapy is unclear.In this study, we retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy between May 2016 and December 2018. We classified patients into total adipose tissue maintenance or loss groups according to adipose tissue change during the 6 months before treatment and compared the therapeutic effect of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between these groups along with the presence or absence of cachexia, a poor prognostic factor.Of the 74 patients, 40 (54.1%) were cachexic. Among cachexic patients, we found no clear difference in the overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the total adipose tissue maintenance and loss group. However, among noncachexic patients, the total adipose tissue loss group had a higher ORR (64.7% vs. 23.5%, p 0.05) and longer PFS (18.5 months vs. 2.86 months, p = 0.037) than the maintenance group.This study showed that decreasing adipose tissue without cachexia might favor the therapeutic effects of immunotherapy.

With the expanded use of immunotherapy in medical oncology, effective patient education regarding immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is crucial for oncology nursing. Therefore, this study aimed to identify educational needs for preventing unscheduled hospitalizations due to severe irAEs.We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 159 consecutive patients with lung cancer who received programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in 2020. We evaluated the frequency, severity, and unscheduled hospitalization due to irAEs based on the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor use. Educational needs were assessed based on initial symptoms, reporters, telephone consultation, and the time lag between symptom onset and hospital visit.Among 159 patients evaluable for irAEs, 73 (45.9%) experienced 91 irAEs during the study period. Seventeen patients (10.7%) required unscheduled hospitalization due to severe irAEs after a median duration of 4.1 days from symptom onset, and 52.9% visited hospitals after telephone consultations from caregivers. Pneumonitis (10 events) was the most frequent irAE requiring hospitalization, followed by adrenal insufficiency (three events). The type and severity of irAEs varied based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor use.The frequency of severe irAEs requiring hospitalization was high in patients who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced lung cancer. The early detection of severe irAEs may be possible through education focusing on common irAEs that are potentially severe. Patients and caregivers should be aware of the importance of reporting slight changes in symptoms after PD-1/PD-L1 therapy initiation in a timely manner. Healthcare professionals need to acknowledge common irAEs and be qualified to implement systematic telephone triage of irAEs.

Lorlatinib is a potent, brain‐penetrant, third‐generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/ROS proto‐oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is active against most known resistance mutations. This is an ongoing phase 1/2, multinational study (NCT01970865) investigating the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib in ALK‐rearranged/ROS1‐rearranged advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without intracranial (IC) metastases. Because patterns of ALK TKI use in Japan differ from other regions, we present a subgroup analysis of Japanese patients. Patients were enrolled into six expansion (EXP) cohorts based on ALK/ROS1 mutation status and treatment history. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) and the IC‐ORR based on independent central review. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic evaluations. At data cutoff, 39 ALK‐rearranged/ROS1‐rearranged Japanese patients were enrolled across the six expansion cohorts; all received lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. Thirty‐one ALK‐rearranged patients previously treated with ≥1 ALK TKI (EXP2 to EXP5) were evaluable for ORR and 15 were evaluable for IC‐ORR. The ORR and the IC‐ORR for Japanese patients in EXP2‐5 were 54.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.0‐72.7) and 46.7% (95% CI: 21.3‐73.4), respectively. Among patients who had received prior alectinib only (EXP3B), the ORR was 42.9%; 95% CI: 9.9‐81.6). The most common treatment‐related adverse event (TRAE) was hypercholesterolemia (79.5%). Hypertriglyceridemia was the most common grade 3/4 TRAE (25.6%). Single‐dose and multiple‐dose pharmacokinetic profiles among Japanese patients were similar to those in non–Japanese patients. Lorlatinib showed clinically meaningful responses and IC responses among ALK‐rearranged Japanese patients with NSCLC who received ≥1 prior ALK TKI, including meaningful responses among those receiving prior alectinib only. Lorlatinib was generally well tolerated., Lorlatinib showed clinically meaningful responses (54.8%; 95% CI: 36.0‐72.7) and intracranial responses (46.7%; 95% CI: 21.3‐73.4) among ALK‐rearranged Japanese patients with non–small cell lung cancer who received ≥1 prior ALK TKI, including meaningful responses among those receiving prior alectinib only (42.9%; 95% CI: 9.9‐81.6). Lorlatinib was generally well tolerated, with a similar adverse event profile among Japanese patients to that among the overall population.

Background It is unclear whether clinical factors and immune microenvironment (IME) factors are associated with tumor mutation burden (TMB) in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and methods We assessed TMB in surgical tumor specimens by performing whole exome sequencing. IME profiles, including PD‐L1 tumor proportion score (TPS), stromal CD8 tumor‐infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density, and stromal Foxp3 TIL density, were quantified by digital pathology using a machine learning algorithm. To detect factors associated with TMB, clinical data, and IME factors were assessed by means of a multiple regression model. Results We analyzed tumors from 200 of the 246 surgically resected NSCLC patients between September 2014 and September 2015. Patient background: median age (range) 70 years (39‐87); male 37.5%; smoker 27.5%; pathological stage (p‐stage) I/II/III, 63.5/22.5/14.0%; histological type Ad/Sq, 77.0/23.0%; primary tumor location upper/lower, 58.5/41.5%; median PET SUV 7.5 (0.86‐29.8); median serum CEA (sCEA) level 3.4 ng/mL (0.5‐144.3); median serum CYFRA 21‐1 (sCYFRA) level 1.2 ng/mL (1.0‐38.0); median TMB 2.19/ Mb (0.12‐64.38); median PD‐L1 TPS 15.1% (0.09‐77.4); median stromal CD8 TIL density 582.1/mm2 (120.0‐4967.6);, and median stromal Foxp3 TIL density 183.7/mm2 (6.3‐544.0). The multiple regression analysis identified three factors associated with higher TMB: smoking status: smoker, increase PET SUV, and sCEA level: >5 ng/mL (P, We were able to quantitatively evaluate the local presence of IME factors that are difficult to evaluate visually, by using a digital pathology platform. The results showed no associations between IME factors and TMB, but significant associations were found with some clinical factors. It is possible that TMB based on whole exome sequencing was not correlated with neoantigen load.

In a subgroup of Japanese patients in the ARCHER 1050 randomized phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety and determined the effects of dose modifications on adverse events (AE) and therapy management of first‐line oral dacomitinib 45 mg compared with oral gefitinib 250 mg, each once daily in 28‐d cycles, in patients with EGFR‐activating mutation–positive (EGFR‐positive; exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R substitution mutations) advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS; RECIST, version 1.1, by blinded independent review). In 81 Japanese patients (40 dacomitinib, 41 gefitinib), PFS was longer with dacomitinib compared with gefitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.544 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.307‐0.961]; 2‐sided P = .0327; median 18.2 for dacomitinib [95% CI, 11.0‐31.3] mo, 9.3 [95% CI, 7.4‐14.7] mo for gefitinib). The most common Grade 3 AEs were dermatitis acneiform with dacomitinib (27.5%) and increased alanine aminotransferase with gefitinib (12.2%). A higher proportion of patients receiving dacomitinib (85.0%) compared with gefitinib (24.4%) had AEs leading to dose reduction. Incidence and severity of diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, stomatitis and paronychia were generally reduced after dacomitinib dose reductions and dacomitinib treatment duration was generally longer in patients with a dose reduction in comparison with those without a dose reduction. Our results confirmed the efficacy and safety of first‐line dacomitinib in Japanese patients with EGFR‐positive advanced NSCLC., We evaluated the efficacy and safety of first‐line dacomitinib compared with gefitinib in a subgroup of Japanese patients with EGFR‐activating mutation–positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer who were enrolled in the ARCHER 1050 randomized phase 3 trial. Results for the primary efficacy endpoint in the Japanese patients (n = 81) were consistent with the results in the overall ARCHER 1050 population; there was a clinically meaningful prolongation of median PFS by 8.9 mo favoring dacomitinib. The safety profile of dacomitinib was manageable by dose reduction or temporary dose interruption and no new safety signals were observed in the population of Japanese patients compared with the overall ARCHER 1050 study population.

Severe hepatotoxicity induced by the standard dose of gefitinib (250 mg daily) often becomes manageable by dose reduction to 250 mg every other day. Thus, we hypothesized that systemic exposure of standard-dose gefitinib in patients with experience of severe hepatotoxicity might be higher than that in patients without severe hepatotoxicity. Patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer who were receiving gefitinib either at a reduced dose (250 mg every other day) because of intolerable severe toxicity or at a standard dose (250 mg daily) were enrolled. A series of blood samples were collected to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters and calculate systemic exposure of standard-dose gefitinib (area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state, AUC0–24,ss). Systemic exposure of unbound gefitinib (fu·AUC0–24,ss) was also assessed, because gefitinib is extensively bound to serum proteins. Of the 38 enrolled patients, 34 (23 patients without experience of severe hepatotoxicity, 11 patients with experience of severe hepatotoxicity) were evaluable. There was no significant differences in total AUC0–24,ss or unbound fu·AUC0–24,ss between patients with and without experience of severe hepatotoxicity. Analysis of the time to severe hepatotoxicity indicated no difference between patients with a high AUC0–24,ss and those with a low AUC0–24,ss of either total or unbound gefitinib. This study suggests that reversible severe hepatotoxicity is not caused by high systemic exposure of gefitinib.

To evaluate the relationship between treatment efficacy and exposure of total and unbound erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations.EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor naïve NSCLC patients were enrolled, and erlotinib was started at 150 mg/day. Total and unbound exposure of erlotinib were prospectively evaluated.Of the 70 enrolled patients, 61 had EGFR-activating mutations (30 patients with exon 19 deletions, 31 patients with L858R). The median area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUCThe lack of relationship between efficacy and exposure of total and unbound erlotinib demonstrates that the standard dose of 150 mg/day is sufficient for the treatment of NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations, despite wide inter-individual variability in exposure and dose reduction.UMIN000012862.

Dual blockade of the EGFR and VEGF pathways in EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is supported by preclinical and clinical data, yet the approach is not widely implemented. RELAY assessed erlotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) standard of care, plus ramucirumab, a human IgG1 VEGFR2 antagonist, or placebo in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC.This is a worldwide, double-blind, phase 3 trial done in 100 hospitals, clinics, and medical centres in 13 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older (20 years or older in Japan and Taiwan) at the time of study entry, had stage IV NSCLC, with an EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del) or exon 21 substitution (Leu858Arg) mutation, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and no CNS metastases. We randomly assigned eligible patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral erlotinib (150 mg/day) plus either intravenous ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) or matching placebo once every 2 weeks. Randomisation was done by an interactive web response system with a computer-generated sequence and stratified by sex, geographical region, EGFR mutation type, and EGFR testing method. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02411448, and is ongoing for long-term survival follow-up.Between Jan 28, 2016, and Feb 1, 2018, 449 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment with ramucirumab plus erlotinib (n=224) or placebo plus erlotinib (n=225). Median duration of follow-up was 20·7 months (IQR 15·8-27·2). At the time of primary analysis, progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group (19·4 months [95% CI 15·4-21·6]) than in the placebo plus erlotinib group (12·4 months [11·0-13·5]), with a stratified hazard ratio of 0·59 (95% CI 0·46-0·76; p0·0001). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 159 (72%) of 221 patients in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group versus 121 (54%) of 225 in the placebo plus erlotinib group. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group were hypertension (52 [24%]; grade 3 only) and dermatitis acneiform (33 [15%]), and in the placebo plus erlotinib group were dermatitis acneiform (20 [9%]) and increased alanine aminotransferase (17 [8%]). Treatment-emergent serious adverse events were reported in 65 (29%) of 221 patients in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group and 47 (21%) of 225 in the placebo plus erlotinib group. The most common serious adverse events of any grade in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group were pneumonia (seven [3%]) and cellulitis and pneumothorax (four [2%], each); the most common in the placebo plus erlotinib group were pyrexia (four [2%]) and pneumothorax (three [1%]). One on-study treatment-related death due to an adverse event occurred (haemothorax after a thoracic drainage procedure for a pleural empyema) in the ramucirumab plus erlotinib group.Ramucirumab plus erlotinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival compared with placebo plus erlotinib in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC. Safety was consistent with the safety profiles of the individual compounds in advanced lung cancer. The RELAY regimen is a viable new treatment option for the initial treatment of EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC.Eli Lilly.

Background Local ablative therapy (LAT) may be beneficial for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oligo-residual disease after treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). However, this has not been fully established. This study aimed to evaluate the predominant progressive disease (PD) pattern limited to residual sites of disease after treatment with EGFR-TKI. Methods Patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy were retrospectively analysed during a 7-year period. Oligo-residual disease was defined as the presence of 1 – 4 lesions (including the primary site) at 3 months from the start of EGFR-TKI treatment. The predictive factors of PD patterns after EGFR-TKI treatment were evaluated. Results A total of 207 patients were included. Three months after the start of EGFR-TKI treatment, 66 patients (32%) had oligo-residual disease. A total of 191 patients had PD, 60 with oligo-residual disease and 131 with non-oligo-residual disease. Regarding the pattern, 44 patients (73%) with oligo-residual disease and 37 patients (28%) with non-oligo-residual disease had PD limited to the residual sites. Multivariate logistic regression analysis at 3 months from the start of EGFR-TKI treatment revealed that oligo-residual disease (P P = 0.032), and initial treatment with osimertinib (P = 0.028) were independent predictors of PD limited to residual disease sites. Conclusions This study provided a rationale for LAT to all sites of residual disease in patients with oligo-residual disease during EGFR-TKI treatment.

Prognostic data on Japanese patients receiving durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) are insufficient. Whether pneumonitis has prognostic implications in patients with LA-NSCLC who have received durvalumab also remains unclear.We retrospectively assessed the data of 82 consecutive patients who had received durvalumab after CRT at our institution between May 2018 and August 2020. A multi-state model was used to establish the associations between co-variables and progression-free survival (PFS).The median observation period for all the censored cases was 14.5 months (5.7-28.9 months), the median PFS was 22.7 months, and the 12-month PFS rate was 62.3% (95% CI: 50.2%-72.3%). The median percentage of the lung volume receiving a radiation dose in excess of 20 Gray (V20) was 22% (4%-35%). Thirteen patients (16%) had Grade 1 pneumonitis before receiving durvalumab, and 62 patients developed pneumonitis after durvalumab (Grades 1, 2, and 3 in 25 [30%], 32 [39%], and 4 [5%], respectively). Twenty-four patients (29%) completed the 1-year durvalumab treatment period, 16 patients (20%) were continuing to receive treatment, and 42 (51%) had discontinued treatment. In a multi-state analysis, patients with pneumonitis before durvalumab therapy had a poorer PFS than those without pneumonitis (HR: 4.29, p = 0.002). The development of Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis after durvalumab was not a significant prognostic factor for PFS (HR: 0.71, p = 0.852).Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis after durvalumab was not a prognostic factor of PFS in LA-NSCLC patients received durvalumab.

SummaryBackground. Prognostic data on Japanese patients receiving durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) are insufficient. Whether pneumonitis has prognostic implications in patients with LA-NSCLC who have received durvalumab also remains unclear. Methods. We retrospectively assessed the data of 82 consecutive patients who had received durvalumab after CRT at our institution between May 2018 and August 2020. A multi-state model was used to establish the associations between co-variables and progression-free survival (PFS). Results. The median observation period for all the censored cases was 14.5 months (5.7–28.9 months), the median PFS was 22.7 months, and the 12-month PFS rate was 62.3% (95% CI: 50.2%-72.3%). The median percentage of the lung volume receiving a radiation dose in excess of 20 Gray (V20) was 22% (4%-35%). Thirteen patients (16%) had Grade 1 pneumonitis before receiving durvalumab, and 62 patients developed pneumonitis after durvalumab (Grades 1, 2, and 3 in 25 [30%], 32 [39%], and 4 [5%], respectively). Twenty-four patients (29%) completed the 1-year durvalumab treatment period, 16 patients (20%) were continuing to receive treatment, and 42 (51%) had discontinued treatment. In a multi-state analysis, patients with pneumonitis before durvalumab therapy had a poorer PFS than those without pneumonitis (HR: 4.29, p = 0.002). The development of Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis after durvalumab was not a significant prognostic factor for PFS (HR: 0.71, p = 0.852). Conclusion. Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis after durvalumab was not a prognostic factor of PFS in LA-NSCLC patients received durvalumab.

Background. Long-term survival data of patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) have not been fully evaluated. Furthermore, the association between long-term prognosis and prognostic factors has not been sufficiently investigated.Methods. The efficacy of concurrent CRT was retrospectively evaluated in 120 patients with LD-SCLC who were planned for curative CRT using concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy.Results. The median patient age was 65.5 years. The majority of patients were males (73%) and had clinical stage III disease (80%). The median follow-up time for overall survival (OS) was 71.3 months. The median OS was 34.3 months; the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 52.4% and 41.8%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.2 months; the 3- and 5-year PFS rates were 37.6% and 33.6%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates of patients who achieved PFS at 12, 24, and 36 months were 70.9%, 83.6%, and 91.9%, respectively. The gradual increase in the 5-year OS rate following PFS extension and initial depression of Kaplan–Meier curves showed that disease progression frequently occurred in the first 2 years after concurrent CRT initiation. The Cox proportional hazards model revealed no significant factors that correlated with long-term survival through univariate and multivariate analyses.Conclusions. Prognostic factors associated with long-term prognosis in LD-SCLC were not identified. Nonetheless, the 5-year OS rate was 41.8%, whereas the 5-year survival rate among patients without disease progression at 2 years was 83.6%. These data suggest that the prognosis of patients with LD-SCLC was improving.

Objective Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have been approved as first-line treatment for patients with untreated extensive disease-small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). However, there are few reports about the long-term outcomes in patients with ED-SCLC treated without ICIs. Thus, we analyzed the long-term outcomes in patients with ED-SCLC. Methods We retrospectively examined the medical records of patients with SCLC who were treated at our hospital between September 2002 and September 2019. The main inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) histological or cytological confirmation of SCLC, (ii) diagnosed with ED-SCLC and (iii) received chemotherapy, not including ICIs, as the first-line treatment. To assess the trends of treatment outcomes, we compared the survival outcomes between 2002–2010 (early) and 2011–2019 (late) groups. Results A total of 314 patients were included in this study. Patient characteristics at the time of first-line treatment were as follows: median age was 69 years; 82% of the patients were male and 70% had a performance status of 0 or 1. The median follow-up time of overall survival (OS) was 7.4 years, and 89% of the patients died. The median progression-free survival and survival time were 4.9 and 12.1 months, respectively. Five-year survival rate was 2%. There was no significant difference in survival between the early and late groups. Conclusions We found that the long-term outcomes in ED-SCLC patients treated without ICIs were poor. Prior to the approval of ICI treatment for ED-SCLC, there was no improvement in the OS for ~20 years.

PurposeProgrammed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy has become the standard first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few studies have explicitly focused on the impact of cancer cachexia on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy. Thus, we evaluated the clinical implications of cancer cachexia on the survival outcomes in patients who received this treatment.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy from December 2018 to December 2020. Cancer cachexia was diagnosed as an unintentional weight loss of 5% or more over six months. We evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with or without cancer cachexia who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy.ResultsAmong the 80 included patients, 37 (46%) had cancer cachexia. Cachectic patients had a lower objective response rate (30 vs 51%, P P P

Background and objective The efficacy expectation of immune checkpoint inhibitors against NSCLC in patients with ILD seems to be high because these populations are supposed to have high TMB. However, information about the characterization of TMB in patients with NSCLC and ILD is limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate TMB in samples of NSCLC with ILD and clarify factors that influence TMB values. Methods The medical records of patients with NSCLC who underwent thoracic surgery at our institution between January 2014 and January 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Whole‐exome sequencing with an Ion Proton system and gene expression profiling of fresh surgical specimens were performed. Results Among 367 patients with NSCLC, 62 (16.9%) were diagnosed with ILD. All samples were collected from primary tumours with a median TMB of approximately 2.1 (range: 0.1–64.4) mutation/Mb. Among 81 squamous cell carcinomas, we compared 27 tumours with concomitant ILD and 54 tumours without ILD. Univariate analyses revealed that tumours with concomitant ILD showed lower TMB values than those without ILD. Multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant ILD was significantly associated with low TMB values. Conversely, no difference was noted in the TMB value of adenocarcinoma between patients with and without ILD. Conclusion Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with ILD do not have high TMB values. Therefore, considering the risk of severe pneumonitis, immune checkpoint inhibitors should not be used routinely against patients with NSCLC and ILD based on the expectation of high TMB values., Patients with NSCLC and ILD did not have high TMB and could develop severe pneumonitis if immune checkpoint inhibitors are used. Therefore, immune checkpoint inhibitors should not be used based on expectations of high TMB in patients with NSCLC and ILD. See related Editorial

Purpose: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. Patients with MPM who do not respond to standard first-line chemotherapy have limited treatment options. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, for the treatment of advanced or metastatic MPM. Patients and Methods: Japanese patients with unresectable, advanced, or metastatic MPM resistant or intolerant to ≤2 regimens of chemotherapy and ≥1 measurable lesion(s) were enrolled. Patients received nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by central assessment according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Adverse events (AEs) and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were evaluated. Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled between July 2016 and October 2016. Median follow-up was 16.8 (range: 1.8–20.2) months. Ten (29%, 95% confidence interval, 16.8–46.2) patients showed a centrally assessed objective response. The objective response rates were 26% (7/27), 67% (2/3), and 25% (1/4) patients for epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic histologic subtypes, respectively. Median duration of response was 11.1 months with a 68% disease control rate. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 17.3 and 6.1 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 40% with programmed death-ligand 1 expression ≥1% and 8% with Conclusions: Nivolumab met the primary endpoint as second- or third-line treatment for patients with MPM and showed promising efficacy with manageable toxicity. See related commentary by Mansfield and Zauderer, p. 5438

Background Nivolumab is a programmed cell death 1 (PD‐1) receptor inhibitor antibody that enhances immune system antitumor activity. It is associated with longer overall survival (OS) than the standard treatment of docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced squamous (SQ) and non‐squamous (non‐SQ) non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We previously conducted two phase II studies of nivolumab in Japanese patients with SQ (ONO‐4538‐05) and non‐SQ (ONO‐4538‐06) NSCLC, showing overall response rates (ORRs) (95% CI) of 25.7% (14.2‐42.1) and 22.4% (14.5‐32.9), respectively, with acceptable toxicity. In this analysis, we more precisely estimated the long‐term safety and efficacy in patients with SQ and non‐SQ NSCLC by pooling data from these two trials. Methods SQ (N = 35) and non‐SQ (N = 76) NSCLC patients received nivolumab (3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks) until progression or discontinuation. OS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. A pooled analysis of SQ and non‐SQ patients was also performed. Results In SQ NSCLC patients, the median OS (95% CI) was 16.3 months (12.4‐25.2), and the estimated 1‐year, 2‐year, and 3‐year survival rates were 71.4% (53.4‐83.5), 37.1% (21.6‐52.7), and 20.0% (8.8‐34.4), respectively. In non‐SQ NSCLC patients, median OS was 17.1 months (13.3‐23.0), and the estimated 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year survival rates were 68.0% (56.2‐77.3), 37.4% (26.5‐48.1), and 31.9% (21.7‐42.5), respectively. When SQ NSCLC and non‐SQ NSCLC data were pooled, the median OS was 17.1 months (14.2‐20.6), and the estimated 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year survival rates were 69.1% (59.6‐76.8), 37.3% (28.3‐46.2), and 28.1% (20.0‐36.7), respectively. Twenty (76.9%) of 26 responders lived for 3 or more years. Nivolumab was well tolerated and no new safety signals were found. Conclusion Treatment with nivolumab improved long‐term survival and was well tolerated in patients with SQ and non‐SQ NSCLC. Trial registration JapicCTI‐132072; JapicCTI‐132073.