1. First-in-human study of IM156, a novel potent biguanide oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors
- Author
-
Filip Janku, Seung-Hoon Beom, Yong Wha Moon, Tae Won Kim, Young G. Shin, Dong-Seok Yim, Gun Min Kim, Hyo Song Kim, Sun Young Kim, Jae-Ho Cheong, Young Woo Lee, Barb Geiger, Sanghee Yoo, Archie Thurston, Dean Welsch, Marc S. Rudoltz, and Sun Young Rha
- Subjects
Pharmacology ,Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ,Maximum Tolerated Dose ,Oncology ,Neoplasms ,Biguanides ,Humans ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Nausea ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Oxidative Phosphorylation - Abstract
Preclinical models suggest anticancer activity of IM156, a novel biguanide mitochondrial protein complex 1 inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). This first-in-human dose-escalation study enrolled patients with refractory advanced solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Eligible patients received oral IM156 every other day (QOD) or daily (QD) and were assessed for safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary signals of efficacy. 22 patients with advanced cancers (gastric, n = 8; colorectal, n = 3; ovarian, n = 3; other, n = 8) received IM156 100 to 1,200 mg either QOD or QD. There were no DLTs. However, 1,200 mg QD was not well tolerated due to nausea; 800 mg QD was determined as the RP2D. The most frequent treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were nausea (n = 15; 68%), diarrhea (n = 10; 46%), emesis (n = 9; 41%), fatigue (n = 4; 18%) and abdominal pain, constipation, and blood lactate increased (n = 2 each; 9%). Grade 3 nausea (n = 3; 14%) was the only grade ≥ 3 TRAE. Plasma exposures increased dose proportionally; mean Day 27 area under the curve (AUC0-24) values were higher following QD administration compared to the respective QOD regimen. Stable disease (SD), observed in 7 (32%) patients (confirmed in 2 [9%]), was the best response. To our knowledge, this is the first phase 1 study of an OXPHOS inhibitor that established a RP2D for further clinical development in cancer. Observed AEs of IM156 were manageable and SD was the best response.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF