1. Patients' and oncologists' preferences for second-line maintenance PARP inhibitor therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer
- Author
-
Rebecca L Stone, M Janelle Cambron-Mellott, Kathleen Beusterien, Martine C Maculaitis, Stephanie Ritz, Emily Mulvihill, Matthew Monberg, Elizabeth A Szamreta, Suvina Amin, and Kimmie McLaurin
- Subjects
Adult ,Oncologists ,Ovarian Neoplasms ,Cancer Research ,Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Decision Making ,Patient Preference ,General Medicine ,Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial ,Middle Aged ,Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors ,Progression-Free Survival ,United States ,Maintenance Chemotherapy ,Young Adult ,Oncology ,Humans ,Female ,Aged - Abstract
Plain language summary Maintenance therapy is a treatment option intended to keep ovarian cancer from coming back or getting worse for as long as possible after responding to chemotherapy. PARP inhibitors are a new type of maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer. This study aimed to understand the patients' and physicians' preferences for the benefits and risks associated with different PARP inhibitors used as maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer. Participants were asked to compare various treatment options based on their different safety profiles, effectiveness and form of medication (e.g., three capsules by mouth once a day versus two tablets by mouth twice a day), and then choose the treatment they most preferred. Through this exercise, the treatment features that mattered most to patients and physicians were identified. The most important treatment feature for patients was decreasing the chance of experiencing a serious side effect that requires medical intervention or hospitalization. In contrast, physicians valued lengthening the time that a cancer remains stable and does not worsen. To accept a 37% higher chance of experiencing a side effect that requires medical intervention or hospitalization, patients expect their cancer to remain stable and not worsen for an additional 28 months. This was a large difference from the 6 months that the physicians would consider as acceptable. The least important treatment features for patients are the amount of pills required per dose, the form of the given medication (e.g., tablet vs capsule) and the schedule of taking the treatment. On the other hand, physicians were least concerned about lowering the risk of experiencing low blood counts that, requiring medical intervention.
- Published
- 2022