Search

First-line palliative chemotherapy regimens in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma include triplet chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, and the doublet of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Use of triplet chemotherapy in real-world populations is limited by tolerability and nab-paclitaxel is not universally available. Regimens using the combination of cisplatin, capecitabine, gemcitabine, and either epirubicin or docetaxel may be better tolerated, more widely available, and similarly effective, but no published real-world data exist.A retrospective cohort review of patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with first-line palliative cisplatin, capecitabine, gemcitabine, and either epirubicin or docetaxel chemotherapy at Auckland City Hospital between July 1, 2013 and July 30, 2020. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were rates of grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity, rate of febrile neutropenia, number of cycles received, and reasons for discontinuation.Eighty-eight patients were included. Median age was 66 years (range 39-79), 28.4% had unresectable, locally advanced disease and 71.6% metastatic disease. Median OS was 8.5 months. Patients stopped treatment due to disease progression (53.4%), completing 12 cycles (19.3%), or toxicity (10.2%). Grade 4 neutropenia was experienced by 21.6%; 10.2% had febrile neutropenia. There were four treatment-related deaths.This retrospective study in a real-world population demonstrates that chemotherapy with cisplatin, capecitabine, and gemcitabine with epirubicin (PEXG) or docetaxel (PDXG) had similar effectiveness to more commonly used combination regimens. PDXG/PEXG are viable alternatives to nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in countries that have restricted drug funding.

Genetic variation in the activation of the prodrug cyclophosphamide (CP) by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes has been shown to influence outcomes. However, CYP are also subject to phenoconversion due to either the effects of comedications or cancer associated down-regulation of expression. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between CP bioactivation with CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 genotype, as well as CYP2C19 phenotype, in breast cancer patients. CP and the active metabolite levels were assessed in breast cancer patients (n = 34) at cycle 1 and cycle 3 of treatment. Patients were genotyped for a series of SNP known to affect CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 function. The activity of CYP2C19 was also assessed using a probe drug. We found a significant linear gene-dose relationship with CYP2B6 coding SNP and formation of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide. A possible association with CYP2C19 null genotype at cycle 1 was obscured at cycle 3 due to the substantial intra-individual change in CP bioactivation on subsequent dosing. Comedications may be the cause for this inter-occasion variation in bioactivation of cyclophosphamide and the ensuing phenoconversion may account for the conflicting reports in the literature about the relationship between CYP2C19 genotype and CP bioactivation pharmacokinetics. Trial registration ANZCTR363222 (6/11/2012, retrospectively registered).

Standard dosages of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy result in severe toxicity in a substantial proportion of patients, however, routine pre-therapeutic toxicity prediction remains uncommon. A thymine (THY) challenge test can discriminate risk of severe gastrointestinal toxicity in patients receiving fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. We aimed to measure endogenous plasma uracil (U) and its ratio to dihydrouracil (DHU), and assess the performance of these parameters compared with the THY challenge test to evaluate risk of severe toxicity. Plasma samples, previously collected from 37 patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine monotherapy for a THY challenge test (ACTRN12615000586516; retrospectively registered), were assessed for endogenous plasma concentrations of U and DHU using a validated LC–MS/MS method. Renal function was estimated from blood creatinine, and patients with ≥ grade 3 toxicity (CTCAE v4.0) were classified as cases. There were no differences in median endogenous U plasma concentrations or U/DHU ratios between severe toxicity cases and non-cases. Significant differences between cases and non-cases were noted when these measures were normalised to the estimated renal function (CrCL), Unorm p = 0.0004; U/DHUnorm p = 0.0083. These two parameters had a sensitivity of 29%, compared with 57% for the THY challenge test in the same patients. Genotyping for clinically relevant DPYD variants was inferior to either of these pyrimidine phenotyping tests (sensitivity of 14%). The endogenous uracil-based parameters, adjusted to CrCL, were more predictive of increased risk of severe fluoropyrimidine toxicity than DPYD genotyping. However, endogenous U measurement detected fewer cases of severe toxicity than the THY challenge test.

Fluorouracil (5-FU), a chemotherapeutic agent widely used in the treatment of numerous common malignancies, causes oral mucositis in a proportion of patients. The contribution of drug transport processes to the development of this toxicity is currently unknown. This work aimed to establish and optimise a simple phenotyping assay for 5-FU uptake into primary buccal mucosal cells (BMC). The uptake kinetics of radiolabelled 5-FU were determined in pooled BMC freshly collected from healthy volunteers. The inter- and intra-individual variability in 5-FU uptake was then assessed across a cohort that included both healthy volunteers and cancer patients. 5-FU uptake into pooled primary BMC was both time and concentration dependent. An Eadie–Hofstee analysis suggested two components; a high-affinity (KM = 3.3 µM) low-capacity ( $$V_{\text{MAX}}$$ = 57.8 pmol min−1 105 viable cells−1) transporter, and a high-capacity ( $$V_{\text{MAX}}$$ = 1230 pmol min−1 105 viable cells−1) low-affinity (KM = 3932 µM) transporter. There was 180-fold variation in the rate of 5-FU uptake into BMC (0.10–17.86 pmol min−1 105 viable cells−1) across the 34 subjects (healthy participants N = 24, cancer patients N = 10). Notably, retesting of a subset of these participants (N = 16) multiple times over a period of up to 140 days demonstrated poor stability of the uptake phenotype within individuals. The uptake of 5-FU into healthy oral mucosal cells is a highly variable process facilitated by membrane transporters at pharmacologically relevant concentrations. This bioassay is simple, minimally invasive, and suitable for phenotypic analysis of drug transport in healthy primary cells.

Introduction In clear cell ovarian cancers (CCOC) limited data is available on genomic evolution with disease progression. Methods 23 FFPE tumours collected from 12 patients with advanced CCOC, and 1 mixed clear cell endometrioid OC, treated at Auckland Hospital from 2003–2017, underwent whole exome sequencing (Macrogen), with matched normal tissue. Results 8 patients had diagnostic samples, 5 had diagnostic and first relapse samples, of these 2 had samples from a second relapse. 10/13 patients had 10 distinct ARID1A mutations, most were indels. In 3 patients ARID1A mutations were present at diagnosis and relapse, in 1 patient ARID1A mutation was present at first and second relapse but absent at diagnosis. Other driver mutations were identified in PIK3CA 2/13, AKT1 2/13, PTEN 1/13, NOTCH1 1/13, SMARCA4 1/13, PPP2R1A 1/13, TP53 1/13 and ARID5B 1/13. Putative driver mutations in ACVR1B and IGF2R were seen in relapse and not diagnostic samples. Three patients had euploid tumours, the remainder had a range of aneuploidy, predominantly in chromosomes 8, 9, 16 and 19. Ploidy remained stable with relapse, except in one chemotherapy-naive patient, who was euploid at diagnosis, and developed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in several chromosomes at relapse. Tumour mutational burden (TMB) ranged from 10 mutations per MB, with no clear trend with disease progression. In one patient TMB was higher in the primary compared with 2 metachronous metastatic sites. Conclusion There was little change in genomic characteristics with disease progression. One chemotherapy naive patient developed LOH and increased TMB at relapse.

Background Failing to take endocrine therapy (ET) as prescribed (nonadherence) increases risk of morbidity and mortality from breast cancer recurrence. We explored predictors of nonadherence, including demographic, clinical, treatment, and personal factors, among women newly prescribed ET for early stage breast cancer. We also examined predictors of their thoughts about stopping treatment (TST). Methods A baseline survey prior to ET assessed demographics, illness beliefs, beliefs about medicines, fear of recurrence, symptoms, and negative affect. A follow-up survey at 3 months repeated these measures with additional questions about nonadherence and TST. Nonadherence and TST were analyzed using logistic and multiple regression, respectively. Patient record review provided clinical data. The baseline survey was completed by 125 women, with a 96% retention rate at follow-up. Results Thirty-six percent reported nonadherence, and 30% reported TST. Results of regression analyses showed that TST was most strongly associated with symptom severity at follow-up, whereas, lower coherence beliefs, and the absence of comorbid conditions were the strongest predictors of actual nonadherence. Conclusion This is the first longitudinal study to examine concurrently the association of demographic, personal and treatment factors with nonadherence, and TST. Findings have potentially important clinical implications; interventions to improve adherence and reduce TST may need to target women's understanding of their diagnosis and treatment, illness beliefs, and symptoms prior to starting therapy.

Purpose: Duligotuzumab is a dual-action antibody directed against EGFR and HER3. Experimental Design: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with KRAS ex2 wild-type received duligotuzumab or cetuximab and FOLFIRI until progression or intolerable toxicity. Mandatory tumor samples underwent mutation and biomarker analysis. Efficacy analysis was conducted in patients with RAS exon 2/3 wild-type tumors. Results: Of 134 randomly assigned patients, 98 had RAS ex2/3 wild-type. Duligotuzumab provided no progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) benefit compared with cetuximab, although there was a trend for a lower objective response rate (ORR) in the duligotuzumab arm. No relationship was seen between PFS or ORR and ERBB3, NRG1, or AREG expression. There were fewer skin rash events for duligotuzumab but more diarrhea. Although the incidence of grade ≥3 AEs was similar, the frequency of serious AEs was higher for duligotuzumab. Conclusions: Duligotuzumab plus FOLFIRI did not appear to improve the outcomes in patients with RAS exon 2/3 wild-type mCRC compared with cetuximab + FOLFIRI. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2276–84. ©2018 AACR.

Vaccines that elicit targeted tumor antigen-specific T-cell responses have the potential to be used as adjuvant therapy in patients with high risk of relapse. However, the responses induced by vaccines in cancer patients have generally been disappointing. To improve vaccine function, we investigated the possibility of exploiting the immunostimulatory capacity of type 1 Natural killer T (NKT) cells, a cell type enriched in lymphoid tissues that can trigger improved antigen-presenting function in dendritic cells (DCs). In this phase I dose escalation study, we treated eight patients with high-risk surgically resected stage II-IV melanoma with intravenous autologous monocyte-derived DCs loaded with the NKT cell agonist α-GalCer and peptides derived from the cancer testis antigen NY-ESO-1. Two synthetic long peptides spanning defined immunogenic regions of the NY-ESO-1 sequence were used. This therapy proved to be safe and immunologically effective, inducing increases in circulating NY-ESO-1-specific T cells that could be detected directly ex vivo in seven out of eight patients. These responses were achieved using as few as 5 × 105 peptide-loaded cells per dose. Analysis after in vitro restimulation showed increases in polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that were capable of manufacturing two or more cytokines simultaneously. Evidence of NKT cell proliferation and/or NKT cell-associated cytokine secretion was seen in most patients. In light of these strong responses, the concept of including NKT cell agonists in vaccine design requires further investigation.

BackgroundTo compare the clinical efficacy of New York Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) vaccine with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant versus ISCOMATRIX alone in a randomized, double-blind phase II study in participants with fully resected melanoma at high risk of recurrence.MethodsParticipants with resected stage IIc, IIIb, IIIc and IV melanoma expressing NY-ESO-1 were randomized to treatment with three doses of NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIX or ISCOMATRIX adjuvant administered intramuscularly at 4-week intervals, followed by a further dose at 6 months. Primary endpoint was the proportion free of relapse at 18 months in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and two per-protocol populations. Secondary endpoints included relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), safety and NY-ESO-1 immunity.ResultsThe ITT population comprised 110 participants, with 56 randomized to NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIX and 54 to ISCOMATRIX alone. No significant toxicities were observed. There were no differences between the study arms in relapses at 18 months or for median time to relapse; 139 vs 176 days (p=0.296), or relapse rate, 27 (48.2%) vs 26 (48.1%) (HR 0.913; 95% CI 0.402 to 2.231), respectively. RFS and OS were similar between the study arms. Vaccine recipients developed strong positive antibody responses to NY-ESO-1 (p≤0.0001) and NY-ESO-1-specific CD4+and CD8+responses. Biopsies following relapse did not demonstrate differences in NY-ESO-1 expression between the study populations although an exploratory study demonstrated reduced (NY-ESO-1)+/Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class I+double-positive cells in biopsies from vaccine recipients performed on relapse in 19 participants.ConclusionsThe vaccine was well tolerated, however, despite inducing antigen-specific immunity, it did not affect survival endpoints. Immune escape through the downregulation of NY-ESO-1 and/or HLA class I molecules on tumor may have contributed to relapse.

After mastectomy, breast reconstruction is increasingly performed using autologous tissue with the aim of improving quality of life. During this procedure, autologous tissue is excised, relocated, and reattached using microvascular anastomoses at the site of the extirpated breast. The period during which the tissue is ex vivo may allow genetic modification without any systemic exposure to the vector. Could such access permit delivery of therapeutic agents using the tissue flap as a vehicle? Such delivery may be more targeted and oncologically efficient than systemic therapy, and avoid systemic complications. The cytokine IFNγ has antitumor effects, and systemic toxicity could be circumvented by localized delivery of the IFNγ gene via gene therapy to autologous tissue used for breast reconstruction, which then releases IFNγ and exerts antitumor effects. In a rat model of loco-regional recurrence (LRR) with MADB-106-Luc and MAD-MB-231-Luc breast cancer cells, autologous tissue was transduced ex vivo with an adeno-associated viral vector encoding IFNγ. The “Therapeutic Reconstruction” released IFNγ at the LRR site and eliminated cancer cells, significantly decreased tumor burden, and increased survival compared with sham reconstruction (P

Summary Precision oncology guided by genomic research has an increasingly important role in the care of people with cancer. However, substantial inequities remain in cancer outcomes of Indigenous peoples, including Indigenous Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand (New Zealand). These inequities will be perpetuated unless deliberate steps are taken to include Indigenous peoples in all parts of cancer research—as research participants, in research leadership, and in research governance. This approach is especially important when there have been historical breaches of trust that have discouraged their participation in health research. This Personal View describes a precision oncology research roadmap for neuroendocrine tumour research, which seeks to reflect the values of New Zealand's Indigenous Māori people. This roadmap includes facilitating ongoing dialogue, Māori leadership, reciprocity, agreed kawa (guiding principles), tikanga (cultural protocols), and honest monitoring of what is and what is not being achieved. We challenge cancer researchers worldwide to generate locally appropriate roadmaps that honestly assess their practices to benefit Indigenous people internationally.

New Zealand has a vibrant research culture, with cancer research that spans the cancer continuum. Our research agenda has both a strong focus on answering questions of international importance, and on addressing research questions of specific national relevance. In this manuscript, we discuss the mechanisms by which cancer research is funded in New Zealand. We outline some of the major challenges currently facing implementation of our cancer research agenda; including levels of research funding, addressing inequalities in cancer outcomes, and current challenges in New Zealand-led clinical trials. We then describe some of the key strengths of New Zealand cancer research, with particular focus on national-level health and social services datasets. Finally, we briefly discuss our new national Health Research Strategy and consider the ramifications of this strategy for the future of cancer research in New Zealand.

CYP2C19 contributes to the metabolism of several chemotherapeutic agents. The CYP2C19 homozygous null function genotype strongly predicts activity phenotype in healthy populations. An additional acquired loss of function has been reported in up to one-third of cancer patients. It is not known whether this phenomenon also occurs in patients with earlier stage or in resected disease. This study investigated whether acquired loss of CYP2C19 function was detectable in patients with stage III–IV or resected gastrointestinal cancer. CYP2C19 genotype was determined in 49 patients, and subjects were probed for CYP2C19 activity on three test occasions. An acquired loss of CYP2C19 activity was observed in 20 % of stage III–IV and 17 % of resected patients at the first test. Significant (p

Aims Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is used to detect relapses from colon cancer following initial surgical or adjuvant treatment. There are little data on transient elevations of CEA while receiving chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting. We aimed to review patterns of change in CEA levels while receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and investigate associations between transient rises and patient survival. Methods A retrospective review of patients in Auckland with a new diagnosis of colon cancer in 2001 or 2005 was performed and CEA values were collected. Three patient groups were defined: no increase in CEA; transient elevation in CEA; and persistent elevation in CEA. Kaplan–Meier methods were used to estimate 5-year survival; Cox regression and log-rank P-values were used to compare survival. Results Sixty-one patients with stage II or III disease who had received adjuvant chemotherapy had sufficient CEA data to be included in the analysis. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 7.4 years (or death). The 5-year overall survival was higher in the transient elevation in CEA group 95.0% and the no increase in CEA group 85.2% compared with the persistent elevation in CEA group 42.9%. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the transient elevation group and the no increase group (P = 0.2). Conclusions The group with a transient elevation in CEA during adjuvant chemotherapy did not have a poorer prognosis compared with the group that had no increase in CEA. This will be further examined in a population-based New Zealand-wide study of colorectal cancer diagnosis, treatment and outcome.

The primary tumor side is emerging as a prognostic factor for patients with liver metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In a combined analysis of data from 2 randomized studies, the addition of selective internal radiation therapy to first-line chemotherapy in patients with mCRC was associated with statistically and clinically significant overall survival gains for patients with a right-sided primary tumor. Background: The primary tumor side is emerging as a major prognostic factor for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We examined the survival data from 2 randomized studies to determine whether the outcomes differ between patients with mCRC with right-sided primary (RSP) tumors and those with left-sided primary (LSP) tumors after selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) plus mFOLFOX6 (folinic acid [leucovorin], 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin) chemotherapy, versus chemotherapy alone. Patients and Methods: Separate and combined analyses were performed on the data from the SIRFLOX and FOXFIRE global trials, which compared chemotherapy plus SIRT with chemotherapy alone for patients with mCRC liver metastases. The primary tumor side data were prospectively collected. The principal outcome measure was overall survival (OS) stratified by treatment and primary tumor side. Results: In the combined analysis of all 739 patients enrolled, SIRT had no effect on OS (median OS, 24.3 vs. 24.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.021; P = .810). For the 179 patients (24.2%) with a RSP tumor, OS was improved with the addition of SIRT (median, 22.0 vs. 17.1 months HR, 0.641; P = .008). The addition of SIRT was not associated with a significant difference in OS among the 540 patients with a LSP tumor (median, 24.6 vs. 26.6 months; HR, 1.120; P = .264). A test of treatment interaction by primary tumor side was statistically significant for RSP and SIRT (P = .002). Conclusion: The addition of SIRT for patients with RSP tumors, but not for those with LSP tumors, was associated with a statistically and clinically significant OS gain. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

There is no standard treatment for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Retreatment with temozolomide (TMZ) is one treatment option. We reasoned this could be more effective if combined with a vaccine that preferentially targeted TMZ-resistant cells. To test the feasibility and safety of such an approach, a phase 1 trial was conducted in which patients with GBM tumors relapsing after standard chemoradiotherapy were retreated with TMZ in combination with a vaccine consisting of monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC) pulsed with autologous tumor cells that had previously been exposed to TMZ in vivo in the course of primary treatment. Of 14 participants, nine patients completed the initial phase of priming vaccinations and two cycles of TMZ, one proved to have radionecrosis, one rapidly progressed, and in three the yield of DC vaccine was insufficient to proceed with treatment. Other than expected toxicities related to TMZ, there were no adverse events attributable to the combined treatment. Two patients had objective radiological responses. Six month progression-free survival was 22 %, similar to retreatment with TMZ alone. Anti-tumor immune responses were assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells using interferon-γ ELISpot, with two patients meeting criteria for a vaccine-induced immune response, one of whom remained disease-free for nearly three years. Another patient with an anti-tumor immune response at baseline that was sustained post-vaccination experienced a 12-month period of progression-free survival. In summary, the combined treatment was safe and well-tolerated but feasibility in the recurrent setting was marginal. Evidence of immune responses in a few patients broadly correlated with better clinical outcome.

In the 1970s, Pauling and Cameron reported increased survival of patients with advanced cancer treated with high-dose intravenous (IV) vitamin C (L-ascorbate, ascorbic acid). These studies were criticized for their retrospective nature and lack of standardization of key prognostic factors including performance status. Subsequently, several well-designed randomized controlled trials failed to demonstrate a significant survival benefit, although these trials used high-dose oral vitamin C. Marked differences are now recognized in the pharmacokinetics of vitamin C with oral and IV administration, opening the issue of therapeutic efficacy to question. In vitro evidence suggests that vitamin C functions at low concentrations as an antioxidant but may have pro-oxidant activity at high concentrations. The mechanism of its pro-oxidant action is not fully understood, and both intra- and extracellular mechanisms that generate hydrogen peroxide have been proposed. It remains to be proven whether vitamin C-induced reactive oxygen species occur in vivo and, if so, whether this will translate to a clinical benefit. Current clinical evidence for a therapeutic effect of high-dose IV vitamin C is ambiguous, being based on case series. The interpretation and validation of these studies is hindered by limited correlation of plasma vitamin C concentrations with response. The methodology exists to determine if there is a role for high-dose IV vitamin C in the treatment of cancer, but the limited understanding of its pharmacodynamic properties makes this challenging. Currently, the use of high-dose IV vitamin C cannot be recommended outside of a clinical trial.

Introduction Colorectal cancer is common and primarily a disease of older people. Colorectal cancer in patients aged 25 years and under is infrequent and may represent a unique subgroup of patients. This study aimed to describe the population of young people in New Zealand diagnosed with colorectal cancer, their tumour characteristics, management and outcomes. Methods A retrospective clinical study was conducted via review of medical records for all patients 25 years of age and under, diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma in New Zealand between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2007. Results Fifty patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma were identified from the New Zealand Cancer Registry. Seven had a positive family history of colorectal cancer, while eight had predisposing factors (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, familial adenomatous polyposis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, regional enteritis). The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal pain and weight loss. Twenty-eight cases presented acutely. Eighteen presented with stage IV disease at diagnosis. Eighteen were referred to a genetics service. Five-year overall survival was 49%. Discussion Those aged 25 years and under that develop colorectal cancer tend to present acutely and move through the secondary care pathway swiftly, being diagnosed at a more advanced stage, and have a poorer prognosis than their adult counterparts. Familial cancers form a more significant component of youth colorectal cancers compared to the older population and input from genetic service should be considered.

Background: Capecitabine and cyclophosphamide are active in patients with advanced breast cancer, have nonoverlapping toxic effects and synergy pre-clinically. We explored the efficacy and toxic effect of an all-oral combination of capecitabine with cyclophosphamide versus capecitabine alone in a multicentre, randomized, phase II study. Patients and methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomized to treatment with capecitabine given continuously (666 mg/m 2 b.i.d. days 1–28) alone (C) or with oral cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m 2 days 1–14 of a 28-day cycle) (CCy) for up to six cycles. Results: Eighty-two patients were randomized. There was no complete response. The proportions with partial response were 36% on C and 44% on CCy, a difference of 7.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) −13.4 to 29.1]. Significant toxic effect was uncommon: grade ≥3 diarrhoea in 4 (10%) versus 1 (3%) patients; grade ≥3 fatigue in 2 (5%) versus 5 patients (13%) and grade ≥2 hand-foot syndrome in 7 (17%) versus 11 (28%) patients receiving C versus CCy, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 3.1 months on C and 6.9 months on CCy, not significantly different statistically. There was no difference in overall survival. Conclusion: The difference in tumour response suggests a reasonable chance that CCy is superior to C alone.

Postoperative chemoradiation and perioperative chemotherapy using epirubicin/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (ECF) represent two standards of care for resectable gastric cancer. In the TOPGEAR (Trial Of Preoperative therapy for Gastric and Esophagogastric junction AdenocaRcinoma) trial, we hypothesized that adding preoperative chemoradiation to perioperative ECF will improve survival; however, the safety and feasibility of preoperative chemoradiation have yet to be determined. TOPGEAR is an international phase III trial in which patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach were randomized to perioperative ECF alone or with preoperative chemoradiation. The ECF-alone group received three preoperative cycles of ECF, while the chemoradiation group received two cycles of preoperative ECF followed by chemoradiation. Both groups received three postoperative cycles of ECF. A planned interim analysis of the first 120 patients was conducted, and was reviewed by the Independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee to assess treatment compliance, toxicity/safety, and response rates. The proportion of patients who received all cycles of preoperative chemotherapy was 93% (ECF group) and 98% (chemoradiation group), while 65 and 53%, respectively, received all cycles of postoperative chemotherapy. Overall, 92% of patients allocated to preoperative chemoradiation received this treatment. The proportion of patients proceeding to surgery was 90% (ECF group) and 85% (chemoradiation group). Grade 3 or higher surgical complications occurred in 22% of patients in both groups. Furthermore, grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 32% (ECF group) and 30% (chemoradiation group) of patients, while hematologic toxicity occurred in 50 and 52% of patients. These results demonstrate that preoperative chemoradiation can be safely delivered to the vast majority of patients without a significant increase in treatment toxicity or surgical morbidity.

Background Molecular markers have transformed our understanding of the heterogeneity of breast cancer and have allowed the identification of genomic profiles of estrogen receptor (ER)-α signaling. However, our understanding of the transcriptional profiles of ER signaling remains inadequate. Therefore, we sought to identify the genomic indicators of ER pathway activity that could supplement traditional immunohistochemical (IHC) assessments of ER status to better understand ER signaling in the breast tumors of individual patients. Materials and Methods We reduced ESR1 (gene encoding the ER-α protein) mRNA levels using small interfering RNA in ER+ MCF7 breast cancer cells and assayed for transcriptional changes using Affymetrix HG U133 Plus 2.0 arrays. We also compared 1034 ER+ and ER− breast tumors from publicly available microarray data. The principal components of ER activity generated from these analyses and from other published estrogen signatures were compared with ESR1 expression, ER-α IHC, and patient survival. Results Genes differentially expressed in both analyses were associated with ER-α IHC and ESR1 mRNA expression. They were also significantly enriched for estrogen-driven molecular pathways associated with ESR1, cyclin D1 (CCND1), MYC (v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog), and NFKB (nuclear factor kappa B). Despite their differing constituent genes, the principal components generated from these new analyses and from previously published ER-associated gene lists were all associated with each other and with the survival of patients with breast cancer treated with endocrine therapies. Conclusion A biomarker of ER-α pathway activity, generated using ESR1-responsive mRNAs in MCF7 cells, when used alongside ER-α IHC and ESR1 mRNA expression, could provide a method for further stratification of patients and add insight into ER pathway activity in these patients.

Purpose SIRFLOX was a randomized, multicenter trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 resin microspheres to standard fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)–based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients with liver metastases plus or minus limited extrahepatic metastases were randomly assigned to receive either modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX6; control) or mFOLFOX6 plus SIRT (SIRT) plus or minus bevacizumab. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at any site as assessed by independent centralized radiology review blinded to study arm. Results Between October 2006 and April 2013, 530 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (control, 263; SIRT, 267). Median PFS at any site was 10.2 v 10.7 months in control versus SIRT (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.12; P = .43). Median PFS in the liver by competing risk analysis was 12.6 v 20.5 months in control versus SIRT (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; P = .002). Objective response rates (ORRs) at any site were similar (68.1% v 76.4% in control v SIRT; P = .113). ORR in the liver was improved with the addition of SIRT (68.8% v 78.7% in control v SIRT; P = .042). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events, including recognized SIRT-related effects, were reported in 73.4% and 85.4% of patients in control versus SIRT. Conclusion The addition of SIRT to FOLFOX-based first-line chemotherapy in patients with liver-dominant or liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer did not improve PFS at any site but significantly delayed disease progression in the liver. The safety profile was as expected and was consistent with previous studies.

e15678Background: In a Cochrane meta-analysis of 5 randomised phase 2 trials CIM administered perioperatively with curative-intent surgery for CRC was associated with reduced mortality (HR 0.53, 95...

e18851Background: Despite the importance of clinical trials, fewer than 5% of adult cancer patients are enrolled in them. Multiple patient (pt), clinician and institutional barriers have been ident...

Systemic treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma achieves only modest benefits, with evidence indicating a survival advantage with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) over best supportive care alone, and further advantage of single-agent gemcitabine over 5-FU. There are very few regimens better than single-agent gemcitabine despite multiple trials of cytotoxic and targeted agents. The addition of a platinum agent has improved response rate but not survival. The addition of erlotinib has improved survival but only by a small margin. The use of gemcitabine in multidrug regimens containing one or more of: a platinum agent; fluoropyrimidine; anthracycline; and taxane has demonstrated advantages in response rate, progression-free survival and, in one randomized study, overall survival. After gemcitabine failure, second-line therapy with oxaliplatin and 5-FU provides a further survival advantage. Further advances depend upon the current and future clinical trials investigating enhanced delivery of current agents, new agents and novel modalities, improved supportive care, and treatment more tailored to the individual patient and tumour.

Variation in drug disposition and response is associated with many anticancer agents, in part due to large inter-patient differences in pharmacokinetics (Petros and Evans, 2004). This may be the result of variable expression of hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP), enzymes which play an important role in the metabolism and elimination of many chemotherapeutic drugs. CYP2C19 is an important member of the CYP family of enzymes and is involved in the metabolism of a diverse range of drug substrates such as the antiulcer agent omeprazole (OMP) (Desta et al, 2002) and the antimalarial drug proguanil (Ward et al, 1991). Recently, it has become apparent that CYP2C19 is also important in the disposition of a number of chemotherapeutic agents, including cyclophosphamide (Takada et al, 2004; Timm et al, 2005), thalidomide (Ando et al, 2002; Li et al, 2007) and bortezomib (Uttamsingh et al, 2005). There is a loss of function genetic polymorphism associated with the CYP2C19 enzyme, with the result that individuals who are homozygous variant (var/var) are ‘poor metabolisers' (PM) of drugs that are substrates for CYP2C19 (Desta et al, 2002). Approximately 3% of Caucasians and up to 30% of Asians are CYP2C19 PM (Xie et al, 1999). Numerous studies have shown a correlation between variant genotype and PM phenotype in healthy populations (Xie et al, 1999; Desta et al, 2002). Hence, the use of a genotyping test for CYP2C19 metaboliser status is often advocated as a substitute for direct phenotyping with validated probe drugs such as OMP. However, genetic variability is not the only factor that can affect functional activity of drug-metabolising enzymes; gender, age and co-medications can all play a role in variable CYP expression. In particular, co-medications can mimic the genetic variability observed for CYP2C19 with the result that a patient can become a PM ‘phenocopy' due to inhibition (competition) of drug metabolism. However, the importance of chronic disease as a contributor to variable drug disposition is often overlooked. There is increasing evidence that the activity of CYP is decreased in cancer. In a small study of patients (n=16) with advanced cancer (Williams et al, 2000), all individuals had normal CYP2C19 genotype but 25% of these patients were CYP2C19 PM phenocopies. However, the mechanism behind this genotype–phenotype discordance was not investigated. Previous studies have demonstrated that the activity of a different enzyme, CYP3A4, is also decreased in advanced cancer patients and that the decreased activity correlates with inflammatory response (Rivory et al, 2002). An inverse relationship between plasma cytokine (TNF-α and IL-6) concentrations and CYP2C19 activity has been demonstrated in patients with congestive heart failure (Frye et al, 2002). Moreover, CYP2C19 mRNA expression is reported to be downregulated by cytokines in human hepatocyte in vitro cultures (Aitken and Morgan, 2007). Hence, limited evidence indicates that advanced cancer patients may have decreased capacity to metabolise certain chemotherapeutic agents due to decreased CYP activity. The aim of this study was to confirm whether or not CYP2C19 activity is decreased in patients with advanced cancer and to determine whether a relationship exists between CYP2C19 metaboliser status and inflammatory markers such as cytokines and acute phase response proteins.

Aim: The purpose of the study was to determine the feasibility and validity of using health-related quality of life (HRQL) and patient benefit as outcome measures in a phase II trial of octreotide long acting release (LAR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); and, to determine aspects of HRQL that were most impaired and aspects that changed. Methods: Sixty-three patients with advanced HCC were treated with octreotide LAR. HRQL was assessed monthly with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Hepatobiliary Questionnaire (FACT-Hep) and the Patient Disease and Treatment Assessment Form (Patient DATA Form). Benefit was assessed directly by asking subjects at 1 month about change from baseline using the Patient Benefit Form. Convergent, discriminative and predictive validity were assessed by testing a priori hypotheses. Results: Seventy-three percent completed a baseline assessment of HRQL. Compliance decreased over time. Fatigue, energy, anxiety, pain, insomnia, and emotional well-being were the most impaired aspects of HRQL on the Patient DATA Form. Convergent validity was supported by 52 of 57 hypothesized correlations. Predictive validity was supported by associations between survival and four aspects of HRQL. Patients' direct assessments of benefit for common symptoms were moderately associated with changes in their scores on the Patient DATA Form. Conclusion: Use of the FACT Hep and Patient DATA Form is feasible in trials of advanced HCC. The validity of the direct measure of patient benefit was questionable, despite its intuitive attraction. Fatigue, anxiety, insomnia, and impaired emotional well-being were prominent, are probably under-recognized in practice, and are worthy of future research.

Traditionally, anticancer therapy has been dominated by intravenous drug therapy. However, oral agents provide an attractive approach to chemotherapy and use of oral treatments is increasing. We discuss the benefits and challenges of oral chemotherapy from the perspectives of patients, healthcare providers and healthcare funders. Important issues include patient preference, efficacy, compliance, bioavailability, reimbursement, use in special patient populations, financial and staff time savings and flexibility of dosing. We review data for traditional oral agents (e.g. cyclophosphamide, methotrexate), newer oral chemotherapies (e.g. capecitabine), oral formulations of traditionally intravenous agents (e.g. vinorelbine, idarubicin) and new biologic agents under evaluation in breast cancer (e.g. tyrosine kinase inhibitors). Lastly, we review studies of all-oral combination regimens. The wealth of data available and the increasing use of oral agents in breast cancer suggest that many of the concerns and perceptions about oral therapy, including efficacy and bioavailability, have been overcome, and that oral therapy will play a major role in breast cancer management in the future in both the metastatic and adjuvant settings.

Background: This dose escalation study assessed feasibility of a totally oral chemotherapy regimen using cyclophosphamide and capecitabine. The rationale for this combination was based on the observation that preclinical models of cyclophosphamide up-regulated tumor thymidine phosphorylase and increased the activation of capecitabine. Methods: Eligible patients with advanced cancer were treated with oral cyclophosphamide and capecitabine on a 28-day cycle. If no dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were encountered during the first two treatment cycles, the next patient group was assigned to the next highest dose level until the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) was determined. Results: Twenty-seven patients entered treatment. The majority of non-DLT were grades 1 and 2. DLT experienced in the first 8-week observation period were grade 3 diarrhea (one patient, level III) and grade 3 emesis (two patients, level V). MTD was observed at level 5, 1331 mg/m2/day capecitabine days 1–28 with 125 mg/m2/day cyclophosphamide days 1–14 of the 28-day cycle. The recommended phase II dose is therefore 1331 mg/m2/day capecitabine with 100 mg/m2/day cyclophosphamide. The best response evaluation showed four partial responses (breast, colon, ovary and pancreas). Conclusion: Cyclophosphamide and capecitabine can be combined at their full oral single agent dose with promising tolerability and activity.

Purpose This phase III clinical trial evaluated the impact on disease-free survival (DFS) of adding oxaliplatin to bolus weekly fluorouracil (FU) combined with leucovorin as surgical adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer. Patients and Methods Patients who had undergone a potentially curative resection were randomly assigned to either FU 500 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) bolus weekly for 6 weeks plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 IV weekly for 6 weeks during each 8-week cycle for three cycles (FULV), or the same FULV regimen with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV administered on weeks 1, 3, and 5 of each 8-week cycle for three cycles (FLOX). Results A total of 2,407 patients (96.6%) of the 2,492 patients randomly assigned were eligible. Median follow-up for patients still alive is 42.5 months. The hazard ratio (FLOX v FULV) is 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.93), a 20% risk reduction in favor of FLOX (P < .004). The 3- and 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 71.8% and 67.0% for FULV and 76.1% and 73.2% for FLOX, respectively. Grade 3 neurosensory toxicity was noted in 8.2% of patients receiving FLOX and in 0.7% of those receiving FULV (P < .001). Hospitalization for diarrhea associated with bowel wall thickening occurred in 5.5% of the patients receiving FLOX and in 3.0% of the patients receiving FULV (P < .01). A total of 1.2% of patients died as a result of any cause within 60 days of receiving chemotherapy, with no significant difference between regimens. Conclusion The addition of oxaliplatin to weekly FULV significantly improved DFS in patients with stage II and III colon cancer. FLOX can be recommended as an effective option in clinical practice.

Despite its declining incidence, gastric cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. The definitive management of localized gastric cancer has been the center of much international controversy over the years; surgery remains the mainstay, with debate centering on the required extent of lymph node resection. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy has been studied for decades, but because trials have been underpowered, it has been difficult to demonstrate a statistically significant benefit. Recently, four large meta-analyses have been published on adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. The first three have been criticized for their methodology, but the most recent meta-analysis was well conducted and showed a statistically significant benefit in favor of adjuvant chemotherapy. The heterogeneity of chemotherapy schedules included in this meta-analysis, however, makes it difficult to define the current standard. Randomized trials in the metastatic setting have shown that the combinations of epirubicin, cisplatin, and infusional fluorouracil (ECF) and docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TCF) have demonstrated superiority over other regimens. The role of preoperative chemotherapy is currently under investigation, with results from the MAGIC (Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy) trial demonstrating a significant improvement in resectability, progression-free survival, and overall survival with perioperative therapy in patients with operable gastric cancer. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy has also been adopted as a standard of care in the US following the publication of the results of the Intergroup Study, INT-0116, although there remains debate over the relative benefits of more radical surgery versus the use of radiation with adjuvant treatment. It is clear that adjuvant therapy is now an appropriate addition to surgery, although there are still further questions regarding the optimal protocols.

BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Survival is poor for patients with advanced-stage HCC, and small trials of tamoxifen for patients with this disease have shown conflicting results. The authors conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials to compare the effect of a tamoxifen-containing arm with a nontamoxifen-containing arm in advanced HCC. METHODS Eligible trials were identified from the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group register and other databases. Studies were selected for inclusion and their methodologic quality assessed by three independent reviewers. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived for overall survival where possible. Metaanalysis was performed using a fixed-effect model. RESULTS The authors identified 10 randomized trials with a total of 1709 patients. Use of tamoxifen had no effect on median survival (HR, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.94–1.16; P = 0.4) or tumor response rate. The findings were stable in sensitivity analyses and were not affected by publication bias or inclusion of low-quality studies or studies reported in abstract form only. Few adverse events or withdrawals were noted. CONCLUSIONS There was no support for the therapeutic use of tamoxifen in advanced HCC, nor for its use as a control arm in future clinical trials. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) remains one of the most lethal cancers. The overall 5-year survival rate (all stages) remains

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Whilst local treatments are useful in selected patients, they are not suitable for many with advanced disease. Here, we review phase II and III trials for systemic therapy of advanced disease, finding no strong evidence that any chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or immunotherapy regimen trialled to date benefits survival in this setting. Many trials were inadequately powered, single centre, and enrolled highly selected patients. From this review, we cannot recommend any therapeutic approach in these patients outside of a clinical trial setting. Including an untreated control arm in clinical trials in HCC is still justified. Every effort should be made to enroll these patients into adequately powered trials, and promising phase II results must be tested in a multicentre phase III setting, preferably against a placebo control arm. Prevention of hepatitis B and C remains vital to decrease deaths from HCC.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant therapy, either preoperatively or postoperatively, and modifications of surgery have been used to try to improve outcome of surgery for rectal cancer in regard to both local recurrence and survival. Assessment of prognosis in patients after resection is currently primarily based on clinicopathologic factors. These predict the subsequent behavior of the tumor only imperfectly. The aim of this study was to evaluate three potential molecular genetic markers of prognosis (p53, deleted in colorectal cancer gene, and thymidylate synthase) in Dukes Stage B and C low rectal tumors treated with adjuvant therapy and to determine whether they correlate with survival, local recurrence, or the pathologic response to adjuvant therapy (assessed by extent of tumor regression and tumor down-staging). METHODS: Sixty locally advanced low rectal tumors resected after preoperative chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone were studied by immunohistochemical staining for p53, deleted in colorectal cancer gene, and thymidylate synthase. In addition, p53 gene mutations were sought by polymerase chain reaction–single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. These results were correlated with survival, local recurrence, and pathologic response to adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Lack of thymidylate synthase staining by immunohistochemistry was associated with tumor down-staging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy but not after radiotherapy or for these two combined groups. There was no correlation between p53, deleted in colorectal cancer gene, or thymidylate synthase immunohistochemical staining or between p53 polymerase chain reaction–single-strand conformation polymorphism and local recurrence or survival in locally advanced low rectal cancers treated with preoperative adjuvant therapies. CONCLUSION: Prediction of prognosis in patients with locally advanced low rectal cancers treated with preoperative adjuvant therapies continues to be problematic. Thymidylate synthase immunohistochemistry appears to be the most promising factor of those assessed in predicting tumor down-staging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced low rectal cancers.

3507 Background: The FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX and FOXFIRE-Global (FF-SF-FFG) randomized studies evaluated the efficacy of combining first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 resin microspheres in patients with liver metastases. The studies were designed for prospective, combined analysis of overall survival (OS). Methods: FF-SF-FFG randomized (1:1) chemotherapy-naïve mCRC patients (performance status 0/1) with liver metastases not suitable for curative resection/ablation. Arm A was oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6/ OxMdG) ± investigator-chosen biologically targeted agent. Arm B was the same systemic therapy (oxaliplatin dose modification) + single treatment SIRT with cycle 1/2 of chemotherapy. Primary tumor in situ and/or limited extra-hepatic metastases were permitted. Minimum sample size was 1075 patients (HR 0.8, 80% power, two-sided 5% significance). Secondary outcomes included PFS, liver-specific PFS and response rate. Apart from safety, outcomes were analysed on intention-to-treat population using meta-analytic methods of pooled individual patient data. Results: Between 2006 and 2014, 1103 patients were randomized in 14 countries. Median age was 63 years (range 23-89); median follow-up 43.3 months. There were 844 deaths. There was no difference in OS (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.90-1.19, p= 0.609) or PFS (HR 0.90, CI 0.79-1.02, p= 0.108) between Arms. Objective response rate ( p= 0.001) and liver-specific progression (HR 0.51, CI 0.43-0.62, p< 0.001) were significantly more favorable in Arm B. Patients in Arm B had higher risk of non-liver progression as first event (HR 1.98, CI 1.53-2.58, p< 0.001). Grade 3-5 adverse events were more common in Arm B (74.0%) than A (66.5%), p= 0.009. In health status questionnaires, EQ-5D utility scores were not significantly different between Arms at 6, 12 or 24 months. Conclusion: Despite higher response rates and improved liver-specific PFS, the addition of SIRT to first-line oxaliplatin-fluorouracil chemotherapy for patients with liver-only and liver-dominant mCRC did not improve OS or PFS. Clinical trial information: 83867919.

Chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea (CID) has a significant impact. A medicinal food product (ReCharge) containing iron-saturated lactoferrin and anhydrous milk fat reduces the detrimental effects of chemotherapy on the gut in animals. We report results of a randomised blinded placebo-controlled phase IIb trial investigating the efficacy and safety of ReCharge in preventing CID. Eligible patients were adults due to start the first cycle of a 2- or 3-week-cycle chemotherapy regimen, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status of 3 or less, had adequate haematological, liver and renal function and provided written informed consent. Patients (197) were randomised to ReCharge or placebo. They consumed 100-g study product for 2 weeks before and 6 weeks after starting chemotherapy, completed daily diaries for 8 weeks and attended clinic visits until 12 weeks (2-week cycles) or 14 weeks (3-week cycles). The primary outcome was days with CID. The mean number of days with diary-recorded CID was marginally but not statistically significantly lower on ReCharge than placebo (−2.0, 95 % CI (−4.7 to 0.7), p = 0.2). The proportion reporting diarrhoea in the previous cycle at the clinic visit was 30 % lower (p = 0.012) on ReCharge. Missing diary data may have contributed to the discrepancy. No significant differences were found in quality of life or other adverse events. We found no clear evidence that ReCharge reduced CID as measured by patient self-report diary. The converse finding of benefit as recorded at clinic visits and incomplete adherence to diary completion indicates that further research is required into methods for measuring CID.

Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are a major cause of morbidity. Post hoc analysis has suggested that bone turnover markers can identify patients at risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) among those receiving zoledronic acid. This study sought to evaluate the effect on bone metastases of everolimus alone compared with everolimus plus zoledronic acid.Thirty treatment-naive patients with RCC and ≥ 1 bone metastases were randomized 1:1 to everolimus (10 mg daily) versus everolimus plus zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously 4-weekly). Bone-specific assessments were performed at baseline and at weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12. Treatment was continued on allocated arm until progression per RECIST 1.1 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1). The primary outcome measure was urine N-telopeptide (uNTX) level, with secondary measures of plasma C-telopeptide (CTX), quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Pain [FACT-BP], Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]), progression-free survival (PFS), SREs, and safety.After 12 weeks, reduction in mean uNTX and CTX on everolimus plus zoledronic acid relative to everolimus was 68.4% (95% CI, 60.1%-74.9%; P.0001) and 76.2% (95% CI, 67.3%-82.7%; P.0001), respectively. There was no evidence of a difference for FACT-BP (P = .5), but evidence was favorable for BPI Severity (P = .05) and BPI Interference (P = .06). Median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-11.2) on everolimus plus zoledronic acid and 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.2-6.3) on everolimus (P = .009). Median time to first SRE was 9.6 months (95% CI, 4.3-15.5) on everolimus plus zoledronic acid and 5.2 months (95% CI, 1.6-8.2) on everolimus (P = .03).In this RCC population, the addition of zoledronic acid to everolimus significantly reduced bone resorption markers and may prolong tumor control.

Standard therapy for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer consists of 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) administered intravenously (i.v.). Capecitabine (Xeloda), an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate which is preferentially activated by thymidine phosphorylase in tumour cells, mimics continuous 5-FU and is a recently developed alternative to i.v. 5-FU/LV. The choice of oral rather than intravenous treatment may affect medical resource use because the two regimens do not require the same intensity of medical intervention for drug administration, and have different toxicity profiles. Here we examine medical resource use in the first-line treatment of colorectal cancer patients with capecitabine compared with those receiving the Mayo Clinic regimen of 5-FU/LV. In a prospective, randomised phase III clinical trial, 602 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer recruited from 59 centres worldwide were randomised to treatment with either capecitabine or the Mayo regimen of 5-FU/LV. In addition to clinical efficacy and safety endpoints, data were collected on hospital visits required for drug administration, hospital admissions, and drugs and unscheduled consultations with physicians required for the treatment of adverse events. Capecitabine treatment in comparison to 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal carcinoma resulted in superior response rates (26.6% versus 17.9%, P=0.013) and improved safety including less stomatitis and myelosuppression. Capecitabine patients required substantially fewer hospital visits for drug administration than 5-FU/LV patients. Medical resource use analysis showed that patients treated with capecitabine spent fewer days in hospital for the management of treatment related adverse events than did patients treated with 5-FU/LV. In addition, capecitabine reduced the requirement for expensive drugs, in particular antimicrobials fluconazole and 5-HT3-antagonists to manage adverse events. As anticipated with an oral home-based therapy patients receiving capecitabine needed more frequent unscheduled home, day care, office and telephone consultations with physicians. In the light of clinical results from the phase III trial demonstrating increased efficacy in terms of response rate, equivalent time to progression (TTP) and survival (OS), and a superior safety profile, the results from this medical resource assessment indicate that capecitabine treatment of colorectal cancer patients results in a substantial resource use saving relative to the Mayo Clinic regimen of 5-FU/LV. This benefit is derived principally from the avoidance of hospital visits for i.v. drug administration, less expensive drug therapy for the treatment of toxic side-effects, and fewer treatment-related hospitalisations required during the course of therapy for adverse drug reactions in comparison to patients treated with 5-FU/LV.

3542Background: DpR has recently been proposed as a measure of efficacy that predicts the long-term treatment outcome for mCRC. DpR is a continuous measure that defines the nadir of tumor response,...