Search

Background Chemotherapy is a first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic bladder cancer, but the unsatisfactory objective response rate to this treatment yields poor 5-year patient survival. Only PD-1/PD-L1-based immune checkpoint inhibitors, FGFR3 inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates are approved by the FDA to be used in bladder cancer, mainly for platinum-refractory or platinum-ineligible locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Emerging studies indicate that the combination of targeted therapy and chemotherapy shows better efficacy than targeted therapy or chemotherapy alone. Newly identified targets in cancer cells and various functions of the tumour microenvironment have spawned novel agents and regimens, which give impetus to sensitizing chemotherapy in the bladder cancer setting. Aim of Review: This review aims to present the current evidence for potentiating the efficacy of chemotherapy in bladder cancer. We focus on combining chemotherapy with other treatments as follows: targeted therapy, including immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates in clinic; novel targeted drugs and nanoparticles in preclinical models and potential targets that may contribute to chemosensitivity in future clinical practice. The prospect of precision therapy is also discussed in bladder cancer. Key Scientific Concepts of Review: Combining chemotherapy drugs with immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates and VEGF inhibitors potentially elevates the response rate and survival. Novel targets, including cancer stem cells, DNA damage repair, antiapoptosis, drug metabolism and the tumour microenvironment, contribute to chemosensitization. Gene alteration-based drug selection and patient-derived xenograft- and organoid-based drug validation are the future for precision therapy.

Background: Cisplatin is preferred to carboplatin when treating metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (mUCB), despite its greater toxicity. Randomised studies underpinning this have been performed in noncontemporary populations with limitations in sample sizes and analyses, affecting their validity in current clinical practice. Objective: To estimate overall survival (OS) and assess the benefit of cisplatin-based regimens over carboplatin-based regimens in a contemporary cohort of patients with mUCB. Design, setting, and participants: A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients diagnosed with de novo mUCB in the Netherlands between 2016 and 2019, who underwent first-line treatment with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy, based on the data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: A propensity model for receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy based on age, sex, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, renal function, performance status, serum haemoglobin, and the presence of visceral and bone metastases was used to produce inverse probability weighting (IPW) per patient. Unadjusted and IPW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier OS curves of both chemotherapy groups were compared by restricted mean survival time (RMST). Results and limitations: Of the 1041 patients with mUCB, 359 received either cisplatin (n = 170; 47%) or carboplatin (n = 189; 53%) as first line. The cisplatin group was younger, had fewer comorbidities, and had better performance status and renal function. The median OS in the cisplatin and carboplatin groups was 13.1 and 11.5 mo, respectively. After IPW adjustment, prognostic factors were balanced between the two chemotherapy groups (standardised differences

BACKGROUND: Pain is not well described in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC). OBJECTIVE: To characterize pain and assess the content validity of the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain item in patients with la/mUC receiving first-line treatment in the US. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted in patients aged≥45 years with confirmed la/mUC, self-reported la/mUC-attributed pain before enrollment, and no major surgery≤3 months prior to being interviewed. Interview participants were asked open-ended questions about their la/mUC symptoms and pain. “Think aloud” cognitive debriefing was conducted for the BPI-SF worst pain item. RESULTS: Ten participants with laUC and six (38%) with mUC were interviewed. First-line treatments included cisplatin (n = 14; 88%) or carboplatin (n = 2; 13%). The average past-week worst pain score (0–10 scale) was 6.2 (range, 3–10); seven (44%) participants reported severe pain (score≥7). Pain was most frequently reported in the back (n = 14; 88%) and/or pelvic/lower abdominal area (n = 10; 63%). Pain impacted all participants’ physical and daily activities; 81% reported it impacted their overall quality of life. All participants interpreted and completed the BPI-SF worst pain item without difficulty; 15 (94%) reported it was relevant to their la/mUC experience. Participants understood the 24-hour recall period; most supported daily (n = 13; 81%) or weekly (n = 14; 88%) assessment, preferring electronic administration using their phone (n = 14; 88%). CONCLUSIONS: Pain attributed to la/mUC impacted physical and daily activities in all participants undergoing first-line treatment for la/mUC. Content validity was demonstrated for the BPI-SF worst pain item in this population.

Purpose: Immunotherapy offers a second-line option for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who failed standard therapy, but the biomarkers for predicting response remain to be explored. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and correlative biomarker of toripalimab in patients with previously treated mUC. Patients and Methods: Patients with mUC received toripalimab 3 mg/kg Q2W. Clinical response was assessed every 8 weeks by an independent review committee per RECIST v1.1. Tumor PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and other biomarkers were evaluated. Results: Among the intention-to-treat population (n = 151), 85% of the patients experienced treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) and 20% experienced grade 3 and above TRAE. The objective response rate (ORR) was 26% with a disease control rate (DCR) of 45%. The median duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 19.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.9–not estimable], 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.8–3.6), and 14.4 months (95% CI, 9.3–23.1), respectively. Both PD-L1+ and TMB-high (10 mutations/Mb as the cutoff) patients had better ORR than PD-L1− patients (42% vs. 17%, P = 0.002) and TMB-low patients (48% vs. 22%, P = 0.014), respectively. The TMB-high group also showed better PFS (12.9 vs. 1.8 months, P < 0.001) and OS (not reached versus 10.0 months, P = 0.018) than the TMB-low group. Conclusions: Toripalimab has demonstrated encouraging clinical activity in the second-line treatment of mUC with a manageable safety profile. PD-L1 expression and TMB were two independent biomarkers in the study.

Introduction Enrolling patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in phase I trials provides an opportunity to identify biological drug activity. Developing prognostic scores may aid in patient selection for phase 1 trials. Patients and Methods :We analyzed records of patients with mUC who participated in targeted therapy and immunotherapy phase I clinical trials at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). The Bellmunt and Bajorin scores were calculated as bladder cancer-specific prognostic scores. The Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) and MDACC scores were calculated as phase I prognostic scores. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. The prognostic value of the Bellmunt, Bajorin, RMH, and MDACC scores were assessed using the Likelihood ratio (LR) χ2 test and the c-index. Results Between 2015 and 2019, 43 patients were enrolled in phase I trials and 12 were enrolled in >I trial leading to a total of 57 trial participants (TPs). Ninty-seven percent of TPs received prior platinum therapy and 60% received a prior checkpoint inhibitor. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly shorter with increasing Bajorin, RMH, or MDACC scores, but not with increasing Bellmunt score. The RMH (c-index=0.658, LR χ2=11.8, P=.008) and MDACC scores (c-index =0.66, LR χ2=12.76, P=.01) outperformed the Bajorin score (c-index=0.522, LR χ2=1.22, P=.5) and the Bellmunt score (c-index=0.537, LR χ2=0.36, P=.9) in predicting overall survivalover. The Bajorin, RMH, and MDACC scores, but not the Bellmunt score, were also predictive of progression-free survival (PFS)prog. The RMH and MDACC scores again outperformed the Bajorin scoreand the Bellmunt score for predicting PFS. Conclusion The RMH and MDACC phase I prognostic scores accurately predicted survival in patients with mUC and outperformed the bladder cancer-specific scores at time of enrollment on phase 1 clinical trials. The RMH and MDACC scores could optimize selection of patients with mUC for phase I clinical trials.

Introduction To describe the efficacy of infigratinib, a potent, selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, across lines of therapy (LOT) in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). Patients and Methods Eligible patients had mUC and prior platinum-based chemotherapy, unless contraindicated, and activating FGFR3 mutation/fusion. Patients received infigratinib 125 mg orally daily (3 weeks on/1 week off) in a single-arm, open-label study. Primary endpoint: investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), best overall response (BOR) that included unconfirmed responses, and overall survival (OS) were also assessed. Subgroup analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes by LOT was performed. Results Sixty-seven patients were enrolled; 13 (19.4%) received infigratinib as early-line therapy for mUC due to ineligibility to receive platinum-based chemotherapy. Overall, ORR was 25.4% (95% CI 15.5-37.5) and DCR was 64.2% (95% CI 51.5-75.5). ORR was 30.8% (95% CI 9.1-61.4) with early-line infigratinib and 24.1% (95% CI 13.5-37.6) for ≥2 LOT. DCR was 46.2% (95% CI 19.2-74.9) for early-line and 68.5% (95% CI 54.4-80.5) for ≥2 LOT. PFS and OS appeared similar in both groups. Thirteen of 59 patients with a bladder primary tumor received early-line treatment with an ORR of 30.5% (95% CI 9.1-61.4), and 46 received ≥2 LOT with an ORR of 20.3% (95% CI 9.4-33.9); BOR was 38.5% (95% CI: 13.9-68.4%) and 42.6% (95% CI: 29.2-56.8%) in the early-line and salvage settings, respectively. Eight patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma received salvage therapy (ORR, 50.0%; DCR, 100.0%). No significant differences in toxicities between LOT were observed. Conclusion Infigratinib has notable activity in patients with mUC regardless of LOT. The findings support the evaluation of infigratinib across different settings in mUC.

Treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) have increased dramatically over the past decade. However, even when novel approaches have proven to be effective as monotherapy, many patients still develop progressive disease, and different strategies are needed to increase clinical response and quality of life. Strategies combining targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy (IO) have emerged as a way to shorten the gap between responders and nonresponders to monotherapy and have reported promising results. In this review, we discuss the current role of cabozantinib in combination with IO agents in the treatment of metastatic RCC and UC and go over future directions in the field.Lay abstract Treatment options for both advanced kidney and bladder cancers have increased significantly over the last decade. However, even when these new approaches have proven to be effective, many patients still experience disease progression. Therefore, different strategies are needed to increase the response to treatment and quality of life. Strategies combining therapies directed to reduce the tumor's blood supply (targeted therapies) and therapies that increase the ability of the body to recognize and attack tumor cells (immunotherapy) have emerged as a way to increase the effectiveness obtained when using these drugs on their own. In this review, we discuss the current role of cabozantinib, a targeted therapy, in combination with immune-based agents in the treatment of advanced kidney and bladder cancers and go over future directions in the field.

Context Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reported durable responses in selected groups of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, identification of biomarkers predictive of response to ICIs remains an unmet need in mUC management, and the role of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression remains controversial. Objective In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed at assessing the predictive value of PD-L1 in mUC patients receiving first-line ICIs as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents across randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Evidence acquisition We retrieved all the relevant RCTs through PubMed/Medline, Cochrane library, and EMBASE; proceedings of the main international oncological meetings were also searched for relevant abstracts. Eligible studies included RCTs evaluating ICIs versus chemotherapy in PD-L1–positive mUCs; the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Evidence synthesis Three phase III trials matched our eligibility criteria; a total of 2237 PD-L1–positive mUC patients (ICIs: 1125; chemotherapy: 1112) were included in the analysis. Compared with chemotherapy, ICIs were associated with higher OS in PD-L1–positive patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78–0.96; p = 0.007); conversely, no differences were observed in the PD-L1–negative patient population (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89–1.19; p Conclusions Compared with standard chemotherapy, our results suggested a survival benefit in PD-L1–positive mUC patients receiving ICIs; conversely, no benefit was observed in patients with PD-L1–negative disease. Although this systematic review and meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due to several issues, our results highlight the need for reliable predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs, providing a benchmark for future studies in this setting. Patient summary Despite immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) having revolutionized the treatment landscape of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), an important percentage of patients do not experience clinical benefit or durable responses. Identification of reliable biomarkers of response to ICIs remains a mandatory need in mUC management, and further efforts are needed to standardize the assessment of programmed cell death ligand 1 in urothelial carcinoma.

This 5-year analysis of real-world data confirms the durable response and long-term survival with ICTs in a broader range of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. After 24 months, PFS and OS curves remained nearly flat. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports, and no new safety signals were observed. Background: In this study, we report real-world results from the 5-year follow-up data of urothelial carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade therapies (ICTs). Patients and Methods: Metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients treated with at least one course of ICT were included in the study. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of treatment with ICT, and safety. Median follow-up, PFS, and OS were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Data of 201 eligible patients were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 66 (37-86) years, and 156 (84.3%) were male. The majority of patients (94.6%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS scores of 0 to 1 and primary tumor in the bladder was predominant (87.5%). The median follow-up time was 54 (1.15-65) months. The rate of complete response (CR) to ICT, partial response (PR) rate, and ORR were 10.4% (n = 21), 22.4% (n = 45), and 32.4% (n = 66), respectively. The median duration of response (DOR) was 34.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2-42.1). Of the 66 patients who responded to treatment, 28 (42%) had an ongoing response at the time of the analysis. Median PFS and OS were 3.8 (2.6-5.8) months and 9.4 (7.4-11.4) months, respectively. The 5-year PFS and OS rates were 9.8% and 12.8%, respectively. Fifty-eight percent of patients experienced a treatment-related adverse event of any grade, and 33 (16.4%) patients had a grade 3 to 4 adverse event. Conclusion: This 5-year analysis of real-world data confirms the durable response and long-term survival with ICT in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients.

The treatment outcomes of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma remain poor. Despite the relatively high response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy, the median overall survival doesn't exceed 14 months. Immunotherapy with anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibodies in the second-line treatment shows significant activity but nearly 50% of patients are not eligible for such treatment because of poor performance status. Therefore, there is a need for new treatment strategies. In the phase III JAVELIN Bladder 100 clinical trial, the maintenance treatment with avelumab in patients who achieved disease control with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy resulted in prolongation of overall survival and progression-free survival with good safety profile.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the standard-of-care front-line treatment option for PD-L1-positive, cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The data supporting this are based on two single-arm trials. Randomised trials to confirm these findings and test new combinations have recently been performed. It was hoped that these trials would clarify some of the previous uncertainties. In this report we summarise the findings from these trials and perform a combined analysis. The results show that immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy is not superior to chemotherapy as things currently stand. The chemoimmunotherapy combination shows a probable efficacy signal, but this appears to be insufficient to change practice. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we summarise the outcomes of three recent trials that investigated immunotherapy (IMT) on its own and combined with chemotherapy (CT) for patients with metastatic bladder cancer who had not previously received any treatment. We show that IMT on its own is not better than CT for these patients. There is a sign that combined CT and IMT probably has a benefit, but it does not seem to be large enough to justify a change in treatment recommendations.

Background: atezolizumab (ATZ) has demonstrated antitumor activity in previous studies in patients with metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma. However, the response rate of ATZ was modest. Therefore, finding biologic or clinical biomarkers that could help to select patients who respond to the immune checkpoint blockade remains important. Patients and methods: in this study, we present the retrospective analysis of 105 patients with urothelial cancer treated with ATZ after progression on first-line chemotherapy. Data of patients were obtained from patient files and hospital records. The association between response to first-line chemotherapy and ATZ was using Fisher's exact test. Median follow-up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. OS was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The median follow-up time was 23.5 months. Forty (74.1%) of patients who experienced clinical benefit after firs-line chemotherapy also had clinical benefit after atezolizumab, while only 14 (25.9%) of patients with initial PD after first-line chemotherapy subsequently experienced clinical benefit with ATZ (p = 0.001). The median OS on ATZ of 14.8 and 3.4 months for patients with clinical benefit and progressive disease in response to first-line chemotherapy, respectively (p = 0.001). Three of the adverse prognostic factors according to the Bellmunt criteria were independent factors of short survival: liver metastases {Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.9; p = 0.04}, ECOG PS >= 1 (HR = 2.7; p = 0.001), and Hemoglobin level below 10 mg/dl (HR = 2.8; p < 0.001). In addition, patients with clinical benefit from first-line chemotherapy (HR = 0.39; p < 0.001) maintained a significant association with OS in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: our study demonstrated that clinical benefit from first-line chemotherapy was independent prognostic factors on OS in patients' use of ATZ as second-line treatment in metastatic bladder cancer. Furthermore, these findings are important for stratification factors for future immunotherapy study design in patients with bladder cancer who have progressed after first-line chemotherapy., NA

Pembrolizumab is the standard for the first and second lines in treating metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the value of pretreatment clinical characteristics and hematologic biomarkers for prognosticating response to pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic UC. PUBMED®, Web of Science™, and Scopus® databases were searched for articles published before May 2021 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they evaluated overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab and pretreatment clinical characteristics or laboratory examination. Overall, 13 studies comprising 1311 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Several pretreatment patients’ demographics and hematologic biomarkers were significantly associated with worse OS as follows: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) ≥ 2 (Pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 3.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.57–4.09), presence of visceral metastasis (Pooled HR: 1.84, 95% CI 1.42–2.38), presence of liver metastasis (Pooled HR: 4.23, 95% CI 2.18–8.20), higher neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (Pooled HR: 1.29, 95% CI 1.07–1.55) and, higher c-reactive protein (CRP) (Pooled HR: 2.49, 95% CI 1.52–4.07). Metastatic UC patients with poor PS, liver metastasis, higher pretreatment NLR and/or CRP have a worse survival despite pembrolizumab treatment. These findings might help to guide the prognostic tools for clinical decision-making; however, they should be interpreted carefully, owing to limitations regarding the retrospective nature of primary data. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10147-021-02061-0.

In recent years, diagnostic and therapeutic advances have contributed to a reduction in mortality rates of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy and safety as both first-line and first-line switch maintenance therapy for mUC. For platinum-refractory patients, in addition to immunotherapy, other targeted agents (antibody–drug conjugates and fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors) have been approved after demonstrating a clinically relevant advantage in overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared to standard of care. Sequential treatment strategies are finally feasible for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. This review will summarize the results of the most important phase II–III clinical trials for first-line, switch maintenance, second-line, and subsequent lines of therapy, and describe the most promising clinical trials currently ongoing in these treatment scenarios.

BACKGROUND/AIM Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) predicts survival of patients with various malignancies. This study explored the prognostic value of SII in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (MUC) subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated 181 consecutive MUC patients treated with first-line platinum-based therapy. Karnofsky performance status

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemical (IHC) status is used to predict which patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) will respond to immunotherapy. We aimed to compare QR1(Quartett), 22C3 (Dako), and SP263 (Ventana) detection of PD-L1 expression in muscle-invasive UCs and determine the best scoring algorithm for assessment of PD-L1 expression when using the QR1 clone. Our study included 69 UCs. For SP263 and 22C3, PD-L1-positive tumor cell (TC) and/or immune cell (IC) percentages (TC%/IC%) and the Combined Positive Score (CPS) were assessed, respectively (positivity cut-offs of ≥ 25% and ≥ 10). For QR1, both interpretation systems were evaluated. The concordances between assays were calculated. PD-L1 IHC staining characteristics were comparable between QR1, 22C3, and SP263 in both conventional and variant histology UCs. We demonstrated strong or very strong correlations between clones; the strongest correlation for TCs was between QR1 and SP263 (r = 0.92; p = 0.001) and for ICs was between QR1 and 22C3 (r = 0.85; p = 0.001). Our comparative analysis of the scoring algorithms revealed very good concordances among the three assays (range 0.791–0.878); the highest concordance was between QR1 and SP263 when CPS was used as the scoring algorithm for QR1 (0.878; p

After first-line chemotherapy failure, metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients undergo pembrolizumab (PEM) or gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) therapy. We retrospectively investigated outcomes of second-line GD or PEM for mUC patients. A total of 198 mUC patients from Nagoya City University and affiliated hospitals who received second-line treatment were grouped according to immune check point inhibitor (ICI) availability: Groups A (pre-ICI: n = 104) and B (post-ICI: n = 94). We compared clinical outcomes using Kaplan–Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses assessed potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Median OS was significantly longer for Group B [median 13.6 months, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.6–17.6] than A (7.6 months, 5.3–8.8). By sub-group analysis, patients received no additional treatment (Naive, n = 70), or PEM or GD (Salvage, n = 24) in Group B, with median OS of Naive and A groups similar. Compared to the Salvage group, significant differences in OS were observed (median 7.6 months, 95% CI 5.3–8.8; Group A, 7.6 months, 4.7–13.8; Naive, 25.7 months, 14.0–31.0; p

Objectives To investigate the eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy and its impact on the prognosis of advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with first‐line chemotherapy, as the selection biases of the eligible population in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial remain unclear. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 213 patients (median age, 71 years) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with platinum‐based first‐line chemotherapy between May 2003 and April 2021. The patients were categorized into the following two groups: progressive disease (PD) within four cycles (trial ineligible group) and non‐PD within four cycles (trial eligible group). The primary outcomes were the estimated proportion of trial eligible patients for maintenance immunotherapy. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of the overall survival in the trial eligible and ineligible groups and the impact of radiologic response at the second cycle on the fourth cycle. Results Among the 213 patients, 81 (38%) were included in the trial eligible group. The trial eligible group had a significantly longer overall survival than the trial ineligible group (P

Objectives To investigate the impact of the number of cycles and objective response to chemotherapy on overall survival in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab. Methods This multicenter, retrospective study included 755 patients from 59 institutions with advanced, chemoresistant urothelial carcinoma who received pembrolizumab. The associations of the overall survival with the number of cycles and best objective response were investigated using Cox multiple regression analysis. Results Overall, 391 patients received standard first-line chemotherapy and pembrolizumab as a second-line treatment, and were included in the final analysis. Of the 391 patients, 185 received less than four cycles, 134 received four to six cycles and 72 received more than six cycles of first-line chemotherapy. An objective response (complete or partial response) to chemotherapy was observed in 145 patients (37.1%). Univariate analysis showed that the overall survival of patients who received more than six cycles or responded to chemotherapy (complete or partial response) was significantly longer than that of patients who received less than four cycles or did not respond to chemotherapy (stable or progressive disease). At multivariate levels, no correlations were observed between overall survival and the number of cycles of or the response to chemotherapy. Conclusions Therapeutic benefit of pembrolizumab can be expected irrespective of the objective response to and number of cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy.

Objective To investigate whether dose reductions in cisplatin due to renal dysfunction were associated with worse clinical outcomes in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients. Patients and methods One hundred and fifty one metastatic UC patients who received first‐line gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) salvage chemotherapy without a previous history of peri‐surgical chemotherapy were included in this retrospective study. Patients with endogenous creatinine clearance of 60 mL/min or more were treated with a full dose of cisplatin, while those with 45‐59 and 30‐44 mL/min were treated with 75% and 50% doses, respectively. Patients were divided into three groups based on the average administered dose of cisplatin of 100% (Group A, N = 43), 99%‐75% (Group B, N = 59), and less than 75% (Group C, N = 49), and therapeutic responses and the toxicity of GC were compared. Results Complete response rates were 9.3%, 13.6%, and 14.3% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. One‐year progression‐free survival rates were 22.9%, 31.1%, and 36.7% in groups A, B, and C with no significant differences. One‐year cancer‐specific survival rates were 56.1%, 71.1%, and 68.3% in groups A, B, and C with no significant differences. A multivariate Cox's regression analysis showed that the dose of cisplatin was not an independent prognostic factor for disease progression and cancer death. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the incidence of severe adverse events. Conclusions Dose reductions in cisplatin due to renal dysfunction did not worsen clinical outcomes for metastatic UC.

Aim: We aimed to compare the mortality rates related to adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity as well as all AEs of currently used regimens of second-line treatment strategies for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Methods: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for articles according to the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis. Results: Five trials comprising 2205 patients met our eligibility criteria. It is highly likely that immunotherapy, as single regimen, has the lowest rates of motor and sensory neuropathies, constipation, abdominal pain, alopecia, decreased appetite, vomiting and febrile neutropenia. Immunotherapy, in combination regimen, has the lowest rates of anemia and fatigue. Conclusion: Immunotherapy, especially as single regimen, demonstrated the highest favorable tolerability to most AEs.

Background Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) historically is treated with first‐line platinum‐based combination chemotherapy, preferably cisplatin plus gemcitabine whenever possible. In recent years, multiple classes of targeted therapy have demonstrated benefit, with some receiving approval in mUC. This review will summarize phase III efficacy and safety data for targeted agents, principally immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as either first‐line or first‐line switch‐maintenance therapy for mUC and interpret these findings in the context of the current treatment landscape. Materials and Methods Published and presented phase III data on targeted therapy for the first‐line or first‐line switch‐maintenance treatment of mUC were identified using the key search terms “targeted therapy” AND “urothelial carcinoma” AND “advanced” OR respective aliases according to the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA). Results Of the six eligible phase III targeted therapy trials, two assessing ICIs met their primary endpoints in platinum‐eligible patients. First‐line ICI plus chemotherapy combinations have not improved overall survival (OS), although final OS results of the IMVigor 130 trial are pending. Switch‐maintenance using an ICI in patients achieving at least stable disease following platinum‐based chemotherapy statistically significantly improved OS (21.4 vs. 14.3 months, hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.86; p = .001). Current sequencing options for mUC include first‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy with a switch to ICI either immediately or upon disease progression. Conclusion Recent targeted therapy trials have expanded ICI sequencing options for mUC. The treatment landscape is likely to evolve rapidly, with results from multiple phase III trials expected in the next 5 years. Implications for Practice Multiple classes of targeted agents are approved for use in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Six phase III trials have recently provided insight on the benefit of these agents in the first‐line setting. In platinum‐eligible patients, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with first‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy failed to demonstrate improved survival, although ICI monotherapy as switch‐maintenance significantly improved overall survival in patients with mUC who had achieved at least stable disease following first‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy. In patients ineligible for any chemotherapy, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or pembrolizumab in combination with enfortumab vedotin may be options., Treatment options for metastatic urothelial carcinoma are evolving, with multiple targeted treatment options, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, showing benefit. It is unclear whether any of these agents will replace the long established first‐line standard of care, platinum‐based chemotherapy. This review summarizes efficacy and safety data from first‐line trials and considers these findings within the current treatment landscape to offer guidance on treatment selection and sequencing.

Simple Summary With the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in recent years, the treatment landscape of metastatic urothelial cancer has undergone a substantial transformation. Nevertheless, disease progression after prior platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI pretreatment remains a challenging clinical situation with little evidence for following therapeutic options. The aim of this multicenter analysis was to examine the efficacy of the vinca alkaloid vinflunine after previous ICI therapy. In our cohort, post-ICI patients showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 22.4% compared to 15.6% within ICI-naïve patients (p = 0.451), and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 51.0% vs. 25.0% (p = 0.020), respectively. Post-ICI patients showed longer OS (8.78 vs. 5.72 months; p = 0.467) and longer PFS (3.09 vs. 2.14 months; p = 0.105). Our analysis demonstrates the clinical activity of vinflunine in a third- or later-line post-ICI setting, and the therapeutic benefit may be considerably higher than demonstrated in previous studies. Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are standard of care in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) ineligible for cisplatin, and as second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy. To date, few data exist about the efficacy of the former second-line chemotherapeutic agent vinflunine after the failure of sequential platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI treatment. The aim of this analysis was to examine the efficacy of vinflunine in a post-ICI third- or later-line setting. Methods: In this retrospective German multicenter study, data of mUC patients treated with vinflunine were reviewed in six centers between February 2010 and December 2021. All of the 105 included patients had radiologic progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The objective was to describe the efficacy of vinflunine in terms of overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) for post-ICI and ICI-naïve patients, respectively. Results: In our cohort, 61 patients (58.1%) had preceding immunotherapy before vinflunine administration, and 44 patients (41.9%) were ICI-naïve. Patients with ICI pretreatment showed an ORR of 22.4% compared to 15.6% within ICI-naïve patients (p = 0.451), and CBR was 51.0% vs. 25.0% (p = 0.020), respectively. Post-ICI patients showed longer OS (8.78 vs. 5.72 months; p = 0.467) and longer PFS (3.09 vs. 2.14 months; p = 0.105). Conclusion: This analysis supports the sequential use of vinflunine in post-ICI patients since the vinca-alkaloid retains a measurable clinical activity in these heavily pretreated patients. The therapeutic benefit may be higher than demonstrated in previous studies.

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens represent the standard of care in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. However, many patients are ineligible for cisplatin due to comorbidities or performance status. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has become a well-established treatment alternative in metastatic bladder cancer. The following review discusses current literature and guideline recommendations based on two case studies, in order to provide practical know-how about therapy sequences and treatment processes.

Background The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), a clinical tool that incorporates albumin and C-reactive protein, has proven useful in the prognostication of multiple cancers. Several immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved for the treatment of metastatic urothelial cell carcinoma (mUC), but a prognostic biomarker is needed. We investigated the impact of mGPS on survival outcomes in patients with mUC receiving ICIs. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with mUC treated with ICIs (programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors) at Winship Cancer Institute from 2015 to 2018. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured from the start date of ICI until death or clinical or radiographic progression, respectively. mGPS was defined as a summary score with one point given for C-reactive protein >10 mg/L and/or albumin Results A total of 53 patients were included with a median follow-up 27.1 months. The median age was 70 years, with 84.9% male and 20.8% Black. Baseline mGPS was 0 in 43.4%, 1 in 28.3% and 2 in 28.3%. Increased mGPS at the time of ICI initiation was associated with poorer OS and PFS in UVA, MVA, and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Conclusion The mGPS may be a useful prognostic tool in patients with mUC when treatment with ICI is under consideration. These results warrant a larger study for validation. Implications for Practice The ideal prognostic tool for use in a busy clinical practice is easy-to-use, cost-effective, and capable of accurately predicting clinical outcomes. There is currently no universally accepted risk score in metastatic urothelial cell carcinoma (mUC), particularly in the immunotherapy era. The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) incorporates albumin and C-reactive protein and may reflect underlying chronic inflammation, a known risk factor for resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study found that baseline mGPS is associated with survival outcomes in patients with mUC treated with ICIs and may help clinicians to prognosticate for their patients beginning immunotherapy.

The American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, with its periodical updates and modifications, has represented and still represents the basis of cancer staging. The historical, long-standing limitations of anatomic-based TNM staging have been recently "threatened" by the impressive amount of data derived from molecular analyses, which have led to an unprecedented level of understanding of cancer genomics. In fact, current era of personalized oncology has witnessed important efforts towards the integration between clinical, anatomical and molecular features; however, despite the promises, personalized oncology faces many obstacles, due to the complex relationship between tumor biomarkers, previously unknown cancer subtypes and clinical and anatomical characteristics. With regard to urothelial carcinoma (UC), the characterization of tumors in large cohorts of patients has provided important information concerning genetic alterations, revealing the presence of biologically relevant subtypes of UC. In the current review, we will provide an overview regarding this recent "translation" from the anatomic-based TNM to a novel horizon, aiming at further "tailoring" personalized oncology, especially focusing on recently published data about the molecular landscape of UC with its therapeutic and prognostic implications.

Purpose Treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) remains a challenging clinical entity occurring predominantly in older patients with limited treatment options. However, real-world treatment patterns, differential cancer center access, and association with outcomes is lacking in nationally representative clinical practice and will provide context for emerging therapies. Materials and Methods We used SEER-Medicare data to identify patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC of the bladder or upper urinary tract diagnosed between 2008 and 2012. We characterized utilization systemic therapy, including first- and second-line chemotherapy. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded; results were stratified by academic versus non-academic setting. Results 3569 patients met study criteria; 48% received some form of chemotherapy within 2 years of diagnosis. Of these, one-third subsequently received second-line chemotherapy. The majority received a regimen including ≥2 agents. Gemcitabine alone or in combination with platinum was the most common first- and second-line treatment. Similar patterns of first- and second-line chemotherapy were observed between patients treated in academic and non-academic centers. Sensitivity analyses of trial-similar patients demonstrated increased utilization (69%). Receipt of platinum doublet as 1st line therapy was less likely in older patients and those with renal disease, and more likely for grade IV disease. Conclusions Roughly half of all Medicare patients with locally advanced/metastatic UC receive systemic therapy regardless of access to academic cancer centers and despite poor oncologic outcomes. Cytotoxic, gemcitabine-based doublet chemotherapy remains the most common treatment. A substantial population of older patients exists for whom alternative, non-cytotoxic, treatment options may be of benefit.

BACKGROUND/AIM We investigated the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), comprised of lymphocytes and albumin, as a potential prognosticator of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients receiving pembrolizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-five patients were retrospectively enrolled and classified as low (

Background/Aim: The current standard of care for first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) is platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been reported to be effective for UC. Knowing whether immunotherapy or chemotherapy is suitable as first-line treatment is beneficial for patients. A retrospective study was conducted on the clinical outcomes of Japanese patients who received three or more courses of first-line chemotherapy for metastatic UC to assess the outcome of conventional treatments in real clinical situation. Patients and Methods: Patients who received first-line chemotherapy between August 2009 and December 2019 were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results: The median PFS and OS were 7.1 and 27.1 months, respectively, for patients with no disease progression at the end of three courses. Of 28 patients, 25 (89.3%) received second-line drug therapy and 10 (35.7%) received focal therapy for disease control. Patients with focal therapy had significantly longer OS than those without focal therapy (p=0.019, log-rank test). Conclusion: OS of metastatic UC at our Institution is relatively long, suggesting that aggressive second-line drug therapy and focal therapy may have contributed to such result.

Five programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are currently approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and the upper urinary tract. Following the FDA and EMA restrictions of first-line treatment with Atezolizumab and Pembrolizumab in platinum-ineligible patients, immunohistochemical PD-L1 testing is now required. Several emerging issues on antibodies, test platforms and scoring algorithms have raised concerns about the comparability and interchangeability between these assays. In this review, we have focused on the interchangeability of the used algorithms and assays for PD-L1 testing in urothelial carcinoma, on the predictive reliability of PD-L1 testing in urothelial carcinoma and the potential of other new and upcoming biomarkers.

Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes between patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC) in the upper and lower urinary tract receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs from 2013 to 2020 across 24 institutions. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with upper and lower tract UC (UTUC, LTUC). Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression were used to assess the effect of UTUC on ORR, OS, and PFS. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified based on histology (pure, mixed) and line of treatment (first line, subsequent line). Results: Out of a total of 746 eligible patients, 707, 717, and 738 were included in the ORR, OS, and PFS analyses, respectively. Our results did not contradict the hypothesis that patients with UTUC and LTUC had similar ORRs (24% vs 28% ; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.24), OS (median 9.8 vs 9.6 months ; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.73- 1.19), and PFS (median 4.3 vs 4.1 months ; aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.27). Patients with mixed- histology UTUC had a significantly lower ORR and shorter PFS vs mixed-histology LTUC (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.91 and aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.06-2.59), respectively). Conclusion: Overall, patients with UTUC and LTUC receiving ICIs have comparable treatment response and outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on histology showed that those with mixed- histology UTUC had a lower ORR and shorter PFS compared to mixed-histology LTUC. Further studies and evaluation of molecular biomarkers can help refine patient selection for immunotherapy.

Subgroup analysis of KEYNOTE-045 suggested that cigarette smoking had a positive impact on the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC), whereas studies on other cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors reported inconsistent results. This study aimed to examine the association between smoking-related factors and the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic UC. This multicenter retrospective study was conducted using data from 95 patients with metastatic UC treated with pembrolizumab. The primary outcomes were progression and all-cause mortality. Time-to-event outcomes were compared with smoking history and lifetime smoking exposure at treatment initiation. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, with hazard ratios (HRs) estimated from Cox regression models. Cubic spline regression analysis was used to depict event hazards. We identified 32 (34.7%) patients with heavy smoking exposure (≥ 25 pack-years). Moreover, 19 (20.0%), 36 (37.9%), and 40 (42.1%) patients were current, former, and never smokers, respectively. Multivariable models showed that heavy smoking exposure was significantly associated with lower risk of progression (HR 0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35–0.97; P = 0.047) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.11–0.82; P = 0.019). Cubic spline regression analyses revealed a dose-effect relationship. No significant association was observed between smoking history alone and effectiveness of pembrolizumab. Lifetime smoking exposure plays a significant role in the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic UC.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RC48-ADC, a novel humanized anti-HER2 antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E, in patients with HER2+ locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) refractory to standard therapies. Patients and Methods: This was a phase II, open-label, multicenter, single-arm study of patients with HER2+ (IHC status 3+ or 2+) locally advanced or mUC who previously failed at least one line of systemic chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). The secondary endpoint included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate, duration of response, overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Forty-three patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 20.3 months. The overall confirmed ORR as assessed by the BIRC was 51.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 35.5%–66.7%]. Similar responses were observed in prespecified subgroups, such as those with liver metastasis and those previously treated with anti–programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapies. The median PFS and OS were 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.6–8.9) and 13.9 months (95% CI, 9.1–NE), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were hypoesthesia (60.5%), alopecia (55.8%), and leukopenia (55.8%). Twenty-five (58%) patients experienced grade 3 TRAEs, including hypoesthesia (23.3%) and neutropenia (14.0%). No grade 4 or grade 5 TRAEs occurred. Conclusions: RC48-ADC demonstrated a promising efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with HER2+ locally advanced or mUC who had failed at least one line of systemic chemotherapy.

Summary Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression occurs in 5–10% of primary urothelial carcinomas (UCs) but has not reliably predicted benefit from HER2-targeted agents in the metastatic setting. HER2 testing of primary tumors may not reflect the HER2 status of distant metastases. We assessed the concordance of HER2 expression in paired primary and distant metastatic UC lesions. Specimens from 149 patients with metastatic UC underwent immunohistochemical staining for HER2, including 79 paired primary and distant metastatic tumors. HER2 status was defined using 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines. HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) was defined as HER2 3+ expression in 5–50% of tumor cells. The HER2-positive, -equivocal, and -negative rates observed were 10.6%, 24.7%, and 64.7% for primary tumors and 9.8%, 12.6%, and 77.6% for metastatic tumors, respectively. HER2 ITH occurred in 44% of HER2-positive primary tumors. Low agreement of HER2-positive status between primary and metastatic tumors was observed (к = 0.193, P = 0.079). Loss of HER2 overexpression in the metastatic lesion was observed in 55% (5 of 9 cases) of HER2-positive primary cases and was associated with the presence of HER2 ITH in the primary tumor (Fisher's exact P = 0.048). Change from negative primary to positive metastasis was seen in 2% (1 of 50) of cases. No differences in metastasis-free survival or overall survival were observed in accordance with HER2 status defined by either the primary or metastatic lesion. These findings are likely to impact patient selection for HER2 targeted therapies in UC. Confirmation and evaluation of the clinical significance of HER2 discordance is warranted, preferably in the context of a clinical trial.

Background Immune checkpoint blockade has made a significant impact on the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, evidence for this approach in patients with non‐UC of the urinary tract is limited. Methods This was a phase II open‐label study of durvalumab 1500 mg and tremelimumab 75 mg every 4 weeks for four cycles followed by durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks. Eligible patients had metastatic non‐UC with ECOG PS 0–1 regardless of prior therapy (except small cell carcinoma who were pretreated). The primary endpoint was overall response rate per RECIST v1.1. A Simon's minimax two‐stage design was employed, with 13 patients planned for stage one. Pre‐treatment tumors underwent PD‐L1 staining and next‐generation sequencing. Results Thirteen patients were treated, including seven small cell carcinoma, three squamous cell carcinoma, and three adenocarcinoma. Eleven patients had visceral metastases. No responses were observed; 11 patients had PD and 2 patients had SD. Median PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.25‐not reached [NR]) with a median follow‐up of 7.38 months (range, 5.23–21.99 months). Median OS was 6.97 months (95% CI, 4.34‐NR). One patient's tumor was PD‐L1 positive and all sequenced tumors (n = 8) were microsatellite stable. Grades 3–4 treatment‐related adverse events occurred in 38.4% of patients. Conclusions In a poor prognosis cohort of patients with non‐UC, durvalumab and tremelimumab lacked clinical activity while demonstrating a manageable safety profile., Metastatic, non‐UC tumors of the urinary tract have an aggressive clinical course and dismal prognosis. This phase II trial evaluating durvalumab and tremelimumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile but lack of clinical activity.

An 85-year-old female was admitted to our hospital for left ureteral cancer and para-aortic lymph node metastasis. To control hematuria, a laparoscopic retroperitoneal nephroureterectomy was performed, and papillary urothelial carcinoma (pT3b) was found. To treat para-aortic lymph node metastasis, she received chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nedaplatin. After 2 cycles, a computed tomography scan revealed its disappearance; however, bilateral lung metastases appeared. The patient was administered second-line therapy with pembrolizumab every 3 weeks. After 3 courses, lung metastases disappeared and she achieved a complete response. After the fifth administration of pembrolizumab, she was readmitted with right upper limb pain and weakness in both lower extremities. She was diagnosed with pembrolizumab-induced grade 3 peripheral neuropathy with Guillain-Barré syndrome-like onset. High-dose monocorticotherapy was initiated for treatment. Three weeks later, the pain and weakness of the limbs improved. After discharge, the dose of prednisolone was tapered and there was no relapse of adverse events. Pembrolizumab was discontinued at the onset of neuropathy, but she maintained a complete response.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors are now standard of care for many patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Given real-world limitations in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing, concordance studies between PD-L1 assays are needed. We undertook comparisons of Dako 28-8 and Ventana SP142 assays in mRCC and Dako 22C3 and Ventana SP263 assays in mUC. Patients and Methods Thirty-two patients with mRCC and 18 patients with mUC who had received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy were identified. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples for patients with mRCC were evaluated with Dako 28-8 and Ventana SP142 PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays. For patients with mUC, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples were evaluated with Dako 22C3 and Ventana SP263 PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays. Results The majority (29/32; 91%) of mRCC cases were concordant between assays. The majority (17/18; 94%) of mUC cases were also concordant between assays. Conclusions There was strong concordance between PD-L1 assays chosen for comparison in both mRCC and mUC, with similar performance characteristics. One limitation is the small number of cases in this study; larger comparison studies are needed for this biomarker in mRCC and mUC.

Background Alterations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) occur in ∼15% of muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBCs) and metastatic urothelial carcinomas (mUCs). Objective To determine the association between FGFR3 status and response to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with MIBC or mUC. Design, setting, and participants The authors conducted a retrospective review and comparison of patients having (1) MIBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), (2) mUC treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (M1 cohort), and (3) MIBC who were from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Intervention Platinum-based chemotherapy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Pathologic response, recurrence-free (RFS) or progression-free (PFS) survival, and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with FGFR3 alteration (FGFR3alt) and those without it (FGFR3wild type [FGFR3wt]) in the three cohorts. Results and limitations Nine of 72 NAC patients (13%) had FGFR3alt, of whom none had pathologic complete response and three had residual non-MIBC (carcinoma in situ, n = 1; pT1, n = 2). FGFR3alt was associated with shorter RFS (hazard ratio, 2.74; p = 0.044) but not OS. Among TCGA patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 74), FGFR3alt patients had shorter RFS as well. Conversely, among chemotherapy-naive TCGA patients, FGFR3alt was associated with longer RFS and OS. In the M1 cohort (FGFR3alt, n = 27; FGFR3wt, n = 81), FGFR3alt was associated with higher rates of pulmonary metastases and nonregional lymphadenopathy. Despite lower response rates among FGFR3alt patients (37% vs 49%; p = 0.056), PFS and OS were not significantly different from FGFR3wt patients. Conclusions FGFR3 status is associated with lower responses to platinum-based chemotherapy, which may prompt exploration of nonchemotherapeutic approaches for perioperative management of FGFR3alt urothelial cancers. Patient summary Approximately 15% of bladder cancers harbor mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene. Our findings suggest that FGFR3 mutations might be associated with lower responses and shorter time to recurrence among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who received perioperative platinum-based chemotherapy. FGFR3 status does not significantly impact response to chemotherapy among those with metastatic urothelial cancers.

Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is an incurable and aggressive disease. In the past decades there have been few effective treatment options that have impacted the prognosis of mUC patients. However, in the last few years, several drugs have emerged as new treatment choices that are changing the therapeutic landscape of mUC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted agents are useful treatment strategies that have been incorporated into our clinical practice. Nevertheless, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is still the standard of care in the first-line of metastatic disease. The results of the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial were presented at ASCO 2020, this trial evaluated the role of avelumab, an ICI, as maintenance therapy in patients who had not progressed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The trial met its primary endpoint demonstrating an overall survival benefit with avelumab maintenance. In addition, new drugs and combinations are being evaluated to improve the outcomes of second and subsequent lines. Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors and immunotherapy combinations were some of the strategies presented at ASCO 2020 that have shown promising results. Finally, the development of predictive biomarkers that help us in the decision-making process will be one of the most important challenges in the next years. Sin financiación No data JCR 2020 1.003 SJR (2020) Q2, 165/354 Oncology No data IDR 2020 UEM

Introduction The advent of pembrolizumab has contributed to improved treatment outcomes for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, but the outcomes of treatments after second-line treatment have not been established. Case presentation A 72-year-old man was referred to our hospital with gross hematuria and diagnosed with suspicion of bladder cancer cT1N0M0. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor was performed, but local recurrence and multiple lung metastases appeared 5 months after surgery. Although gemcitabine-cisplatin was performed as first-line chemotherapy, the local lesion increased, and pembrolizumab was used as a second-line treatment. Pembrolizumab was also ineffective; however, re-challenge with gemcitabine-cisplatin as third-line treatment produced a good therapeutic effect. Conclusion We report a successful case in which gemcitabine-cisplatin re-challenge after pembrolizumab therapy was effective in metastatic bladder cancer. Re-administration of chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitors may be a broadly effective treatment option.

Bladder cancer is the tenth most common cancer type worldwide. Urothelial carcinoma is the most common type of bladder cancer and accounts for 90% of bladder cancer cases in the USA and Europe. Novel approaches are needed to improve patient outcomes. Nectin-4 is a tumour-associated antigen found on the surface of most urothelial carcinoma cells. In the antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin, human anti-nectin-4 antibody is linked to the cytotoxic microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E. In ongoing phase I, II and III clinical trials, enfortumab vedotin has been evaluated as a monotherapy and in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor and/or chemotherapy in locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Encouraging data from the phase II study resulted in the FDA granting accelerated approval for enfortumab vedotin in December 2019 for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were previously treated with platinum and a checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Moreover, data from a phase I study led to the FDA granting breakthrough therapy designation to enfortumab vedotin combined with pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment in February 2020 for cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Results of ongoing and future combination studies of enfortumab vedotin with immunotherapy and other novel agents are eagerly awaited.

Tislelizumab, an anti‐programmed death protein‐1 (PD‐1) monoclonal antibody, was engineered to minimize binding to the FcγR on macrophages to abrogate antibody‐dependent phagocytosis, a mechanism of T‐cell clearance and potential resistance to anti‐PD‐1 therapy. This single‐arm phase 2 trial (NCT04004221/CTR20170071) assessed the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of tislelizumab in patients with PD‐L1‐positive urothelial carcinoma who progressed during/following platinum‐containing therapy and had no prior PD‐(L)1 inhibitor treatment. Patients were considered PD‐L1 positive if ≥ 25% of tumor/immune cells expressed PD‐L1 when using the VENTANA™ PD‐L1 (SP263) assay. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by independent review committee. As of September 16, 2019, 113 patients had a median study follow‐up time of 9.4 mo. Most patients (76%) had visceral metastases, including 24% with liver and 23% with bone metastases. Among 104 efficacy‐evaluable patients, confirmed objective response rate was 24% (95% confidence interval, 16, 33), including 10 complete and 15 partial responses. Median duration of response was not reached. Among 25 responders, 17/25 (68%) had ongoing responses. Median progression‐free survival and overall survival times were 2.1 and 9.8 mo, respectively. The most common treatment‐related adverse events were anemia (27%) and pyrexia (19%). Anemia (7%) and hyponatremia (5%) were the only grade 3‐4 treatment‐related adverse events and occurred in ≥ 5% of patients. Three investigator‐assessed deaths were considered to be possibly related to study treatment (hepatic failure, n = 2; respiratory arrest, n = 1). Tislelizumab demonstrated meaningful clinical benefits in patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic PD‐L1‐positive urothelial carcinoma and had a manageable safety profile., Tislelizumab is a unique anti‐PD‐1 antibody that was engineered specifically to minimize FcγR binding in order to limit antibody‐dependent phagocytosis, a potential mechanism of resistance to anti‐PD‐1 therapy. In the current study, tislelizumab demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity in patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic PD‐L1‐positive urothelial carcinoma and had a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals compared with other anti‐PD‐L1/PD‐1 therapies. A phase 3 study of tislelizumab as treatment for urothelial carcinoma (NCT03967977) is currently ongoing and is recruiting patients.

Objective. There is the second generalized analysis of administration of vinflunine in real clinical practice in Russia.Materials and methods. This analysis gathered 15 patients with urothelial carcinoma treated using this medicine in 8 cancer centers in Russia. We assessed efficacy, safety profile of vinflunine in this subset of patients.Results. Clinical efficacy of vinflunine (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was 73.3 %, one patient demonstrated complete response. Median of response duration accounts for 3.8 months. Six-month and 1-year survival rate made up 93.3 %. Adverse events were observed in 53.5 %, with only one episode of neutropenia 4 grade.Conclusion. In our second analysis vinflunine was more effective than in randomized clinical trial and other studies from real practice in Europe. Thus, we confirm expediency to administer of vinflunine for metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Gurjyot K Doshi,1 Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar,2 Mairead Kearney,3 Murtuza Bharmal,2 Paul Cislo,4 Ruth Kim,4 Marley Boyd,5 Kathleen M Aguilar,5 Hemant Phatak2 1Texas Oncology, Houston, TX, USA; 2EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Rockland, MA, USA; an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; 3Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; 4Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA; 5Data, Evidence and Insights, McKesson Life Sciences, The US Oncology Network, The Woodlands, TX, USACorrespondence: Abhijeet BhanegaonkarDirector, US Health Economics and Outcomes Research – Oncology, North America Medical Affairs, EMD Serono, Inc., One Technology Place, Rockland, MA 02370, USATel +1 781-681-2483Email abhijeet.bhanegaonkar@emdserono.comPurpose: Clinical trial evidence has affirmed the role for immuno-oncology (IO) treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). This Study informing treatment Pathway dEcision in bladder cAnceR (SPEAR-Bladder) aimed to provide insight into the optimal sequencing of IO treatments among la/mUC patients treated in the US Oncology Network.Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with la/mUC who initiated first-line chemotherapy followed by either IO therapy (C-IO subgroup) or chemotherapy (C-C subgroup) between 01/01/2015 and 04/30/2017 and included a potential follow-up period through 06/30/2017. Data were sourced from iKnowMed electronic health records. Patient and treatment characteristics were assessed descriptively, with Kaplan–Meier methods used to evaluate time-to-event outcomes, including overall survival (OS).Results: A total of 117 patients were included in this analysis (median age 69 years, 74.4% male, 88.0% Caucasian): 79 and 38 patients were in the C-IO and C-C subgroups, respectively. The median OS was 19.2 months among patients who received the C-IO sequence and 11.9 months among those who received the C-C treatment sequence.Conclusion: These results suggest that patients who received the C-IO treatment sequence had notable improvement in OS compared with those who received the C-C sequence. In light of the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, further investigation will be required to determine how best to select the optimal therapeutic regimen and sequencing for patients with la/mUC.Keywords: urothelial carcinoma, SPEAR-Bladder, real-world clinical outcomes, treatment sequencing, retrospective, community oncology setting

Nobuki Furubayashi, Takahito Negishi, Akihiro Miura, Nobutaka Nakamura, Motonobu Nakamura Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, JapanCorrespondence: Nobuki Furubayashi Tel +81-92-541-3231Fax +81-92-551-4585Email furubayashi-jua@umin.ac.jpBackground: To evaluate the organ-specific therapeutic effect of paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) chemotherapy in patients who failed platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with metastatic UC who had received TC chemotherapy after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab. The RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess the objective response to pembrolizumab and TC chemotherapy at tumor sites.Results: We analyzed 8 patients (male, n=5; female, n=3; median age, 65 years old). All patients except one had visceral metastasis. The median overall survival for TC was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval, 1.0‑12.7 months), and the objective response rate was 25.0% (partial response [PR]: 2 cases). The metastatic organs were the lymph nodes in 5 cases (number of tumor sites: 8), lung in 4 cases (number of tumor sites: 12), liver in 3 cases (number of tumor sites: 14), bone in 3 cases (number of tumor sites: 12), and primary lesion in 3 cases (number of tumor sites: 3). There were no cases of a complete response or progressive disease in any metastatic organs due to TC chemotherapy. A PR was seen in 2 cases of lymph node metastasis (40.0%), 2 cases of lung metastasis (50.0%), and 2 cases of liver metastasis (66.7%). All 3 cases of bone metastasis showed stable disease, as did all 3 cases of primary lesion. Improvement in the therapeutic effect of TC chemotherapy compared with pembrolizumab was observed in 2 cases (40.0%) of lymph node metastasis, 2 cases (50.0%) of lung metastasis, and 1 case (33.3%) of liver metastasis.Conclusion: Lymph node, lung, and liver metastases may respond to TC chemotherapy, even if exacerbated with pembrolizumab after platinum-based chemotherapy in metastatic UC.Keywords: urothelial carcinoma, platinum-based chemotherapy, pembrolizumab, paclitaxel, carboplatin, organ-specific therapeutic effect

Purpose:To assess the antitumor activity and safety of tipifarnib, a highly potent and selective farnesyltransferase inhibitor, we performed a phase II clinical trial in patients with advanced and refractory urothelial carcinoma harboring missense HRAS mutations.Patients and Methods:A total of 245 adult patients with previously treated, advanced urothelial carcinoma entered the molecular screening program including HRAS. Those with missense HRAS mutations or STK11:rs2075606 received oral tipifarnib 900 mg twice daily on days 1–7 and 15–21 of 28-day treatment cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6).Results:We identified 16 (7%) missense HRAS mutations (G13R, 7; Q61R, 4; G12S, 3; G12C, 2) and 104 (46%) STK11:rs2075606 carriers. In 21 patients enrolled in the study, 14 and 7 patients had missense HRAS mutations and STK11:rs2075606, respectively. The most frequently observed adverse events included fatigue (86%) and hematologic toxicities. With a median follow-up of 28 months, 4 patients (19%) reached PFS6: 3 had missense HRAS mutations and one patient, enrolled as an STK11 carrier, had HRAS frameshift insertions at H27fs and H28fs rendering a nonsense HRAS mutation. The overall response rate by intent-to-treat analysis was 24% (4 missense and one nonsense frameshift HRAS mutation); no response was observed in patients with urothelial carcinoma with wild-type HRAS tumors. Five responses were observed in 12 evaluable patients of 15 with tumors carrying HRAS mutations.Conclusions:Oral tipifarnib resulted in a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor efficacy against treatment-refractory urothelial carcinoma containing HRAS mutations.

Introduction: Despite significant advances in the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma, including the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors, this disease is still challenging to treat and associated poor outcomes remain. Genomic characterization of advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma is widening the field of potential treatments due to the identification of novel biologic drivers. Areas covered: In this review, we explore the role of PARP, HER-2, and mTOR inhibitors in the therapeutic scenario of advanced urothelial carcinoma, as these pathways are frequently altered in urothelial carcinoma. We report ongoing clinical trials involving these agents, either in monotherapy or in combination with other compounds, highlighting the dynamic scenario of metastatic urothelial carcinoma treatment. Expert opinion: Several challenges need to be faced in the development of new potential therapeutic strategies, such as inter/intratumoral heterogeneity and the lack of validated biomarkers.

Background The phosphatidyl 3-inositol kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway frequently is activated in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC). In the current study, the authors performed a phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy of the pan-isoform class I PI3K inhibitor buparlisib in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic UC. Methods Two cohorts were recruited: an initial genetically unselected cohort and a subsequent expansion cohort of patients with PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway-altered tumors. The primary endpoint was the 2-month progression-free survival rate. A rate of ≥80% was considered promising using a Simon 2-stage minimax design. Secondary endpoints included safety and correlation of markers of PI3K pathway activation with outcome. Results Six of 13 evaluable patients within the initial cohort demonstrated stable disease and 1 demonstrated a partial response, which was below the cutoff of 9 patients required to proceed to stage 2. Three of the patients with stable disease and the patient with a partial response harbored somatic TSC1 alterations. Four patients subsequently were recruited onto an expansion cohort: 3 patients with TSC1 alterations and 1 patient with a PIK3CA-activating mutation. No patient achieved disease control at 8 weeks and accrual was halted. Of the 19 patients evaluable for toxicity, 17 demonstrated treatment-related toxicities, 2 of whom had to discontinue therapy. Conclusions Buparlisib was found to demonstrate modest activity in patients with metastatic UC whose tumors harbored TSC1 loss of function alterations; however, this was not a robust predictor of response to buparlisib. The pattern of genetic coalterations likely influences drug sensitivity. Given the modest clinical activity and substantial toxicity of buparlisib, future trials of PI3K inhibitors in patients with UC should focus on isoform-selective PI3K inhibitors in genomically selected patients. Lay summary The phosphatidyl 3-inositol kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway frequently is upregulated in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). This trial explored buparlisib, an inhibitor of the pathway, in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic UC. Although the drug was found to have modest efficacy, with 6 patients experiencing stable disease and 1 patient achieving a partial response at 8 weeks on therapy, significant side effects also were observed. Patients with specific genetic alterations responded to treatment. Further studies of PI3K pathway inhibition are warranted using newer agents that have superior toxicity profiles and are more selective inhibitors of the pathway.