Search

Utilization of novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and check-point inhibitors (CI) has increased in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL). We conducted a retrospective study of 209 patients who had ASCT for r/r cHL at our institution and compared outcomes of those who had ASCT from 2010-2018 (cohort 2, n = 110) with those who had ASCT between 2000 and 2009 (cohort 1, n = 99). The median OS was 7.6 years for cohort 1 [HR 2.08; 95% CI 1.14-3.80; p = 0.017] and not reached for cohort 2; with 4-year improved OS difference of 15% (80% vs 65%) in cohort 2 vs cohort 1. The median PFS of cohort 1 was 30 months vs 39 months for cohort 2[HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.82-1.88; p = 0.3]. This study highlights improved OS of r/r cHL patients who have received ASCT in the novel agent era due to the exposure to agents such as BV and CIs.

The use of G-CSF post allogeneic transplant has become a common practice to accelerate neutrophil engraftment. There is some controversy in its use. To further evaluate the effectiveness, we compared outcomes in patients who underwent PBSCT, either with or without the planned use of G-CSF post SCT. Among consecutive 162 patients from October 2012 to October 2014, 65 patients received G-CSF post-PBSCT, and 97 did not. More patients in G-CSF group received MAC (78% vs. 55%). Patients who received G-CSF had earlier neutrophil engraftment (median days 11 vs. 14) and shorter post-transplant hospital stay (median days 16 vs. 20

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) targets in-vivo T lymphocytes. Variations in the recipient absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) might result in a variable exposure of ATG. We hypothesized that recipient ALC on the first day of ATG might predict transplant outcomes. We evaluated 217 patients undergoing 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) between January 2005 and December 2017, and receiving rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin, total dose 4.5 mg/kg) on days -3, -2 and -1. With a median follow up of 3.68 years for survival (OS), one-year OS, relapse rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 64.7%, 15.9%, 25.8%, and 58.4%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that ALC100 k/mm

Maintenance therapy after first autologous transplant (autoSCT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM). However, efficacy of maintenance therapy after second autoSCT is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of 111 adult MM patients who underwent second autoSCT between January 2000 and December 2018. Lenalidomide up to 15 mg daily or subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m

Purpose. Women with locally advanced/high-risk triple-negative breast cancer treated with the current standard chemotherapy continue to have a poor prognosis. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant as treatment for locally advanced/high-risk breast cancer remains controversial due to a lack of survival benefit seen in previous phase III trials. However, these trials evaluated a heterogeneous group of patients with different receptor subtypes. A marginal benefit was observed in certain subgroups. We report long-term outcomes of women with stage IIB or III triple-negative breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant at our institution between 1995 and 2001. Methods. This is a retrospective analysis of stage IIB or stage III triple-negative breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant. We excluded women with hormone-positive, HER2/neu-positive/unknown, and/or metastatic disease prior to transplant as per updated AJCC 7th edition guidelines. Patients underwent surgery and either neoadjuvant or adjuvant anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy and then proceeded to high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant using carmustine 600 mg/sqm, cyclophosphamide 5.6gm/sqm, and cisplatin 165 mg/sqm (STAMP 1 regimen) for consolidation. This was followed by locoregional breast and lymph node radiation per standard of care. Results. Twenty-nine women (2 stage IIB and 27 stage III) were evaluated. The median age at diagnosis was 43 years (IQR: 40, 51). Eleven patients had 4–9 regional lymph nodes (LN) involved and 16 had 10+ involved LNs. Four patients had T4 or inflammatory breast cancer and two had ipsilateral supraclavicular LNs involved. The median follow-up time is 16 years (95% CI: 12, 19, range

The information on the impact of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) on haploidentical donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant (haploPBSCT) outcomes is limited. We retrospectively evaluated 98 patients who underwent haploPBSCT between June 2012 and June 2019 for the onset and severity of CRS per the ASTCT guidelines. The incidence of CRS was 93% (91/98). Outcomes were compared between grade 1-2 and 3-4 CRS. Eighty-one patients developed grade 1-2 CRS (89%) and 10 (11%) developed grade 3-4 CRS. Compared to grade 1-2 CRS, grade 3-4 CRS experienced adverse survival (73.7% vs. 30%, p

PURPOSE: Although fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is frequently utilized in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) patients, its impact on morbidity and mortality is uncertain. This study investigates the role of quinolone prophylaxis after AHSCT in recent years. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 291 consecutive adult patients who underwent AHSCT for malignant disorders, between June 2013 and January 2015. Outcomes were compared between patients who received norfloxacin prophylaxis and those who did not. The endpoints were mortality during prophylaxis and at 100 days after transplant, frequency of ICU admissions, and incidence and type of bacteremia. RESULTS: Of 291 patients, 252 patients received norfloxacin prophylaxis and 39 patients did not. The mortality during prophylaxis and at 100 days as well as the median number of days of hospitalization following AHSCT did not differ between the two groups. No differences were noted in the frequency of ICU admission, incidence of septic shock, and duration of ICU stay. Patients who did not receive prophylaxis had a significantly higher rate of neutropenic fever (97%) than patients who received prophylaxis (77%) (p = 0.005). The patients with prophylaxis demonstrated a significantly higher rate of gram-positive bacteremia as compared to those without prophylaxis (p = 0.002). Frequency of Clostridium difficile infection was similar during and post-prophylaxis. More antibiotic use was noted among patients without prophylaxis [97%; median 9 (range, 5–24) days] compared to patients with prophylaxis [79%; median 7 (range, 3–36) days, p = 0.04]. CONCLUSION: Although fluoroquinolone prophylaxis reduced the incidence of neutropenic fever and antibiotic use in AHSCT, it did not alter mortality or morbidity.

Introduction: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare aggressive form of breast cancer. It is well known that the long-term survival and progression-free survival of IBC are worse than that of non-IBC. We report the long term outcomes of patients with IBC and non-IBC who had undergone high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). Methods: All 3387 patients with IBC or non-IBC who underwent HDC with AHCT between1990-2002 and registered with CIBMTR were included in this analysis. Transplant-related mortality (TRM), disease relapse/progression, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two cohorts. Multivariate Cox regression model was used to determine the independent impact of stage on outcomes. Results: 527 patients with IBC and 2,860 patients with non-IBC were included; the median age at transplantation (47 vs 46 years old) and median follow-up period in the 2 groups (167 vs 168 months) were similar. The most common conditioning regimen was cyclophosphamide and carboplatin based in both groups (54% in IBC and 50% in non-IBC). AHCT was well tolerated in both groups. TRM was similar in both groups (one year TRM was 2% for IBC and 3% for non-IBC, p=0.16). The most common cause of death was disease progression or relapse (81% in IBC and 75% in non-IBC). The median survival for both IBC and non-IBC was the same at 40 months. The PFS at 10 years was 27% (95% CI: 23-31%) for IBC and 24% (95% CI: 22-26%) for non-IBC (p=0.21), and the OS at 10 years was 31% (95% CI: 27-35%) for IBC and 28% (95% CI: 26-30%) for non-IBC (p=0.16). In univariate analysis, patients with stage III IBC and no active diseases at transplantation had lower PFS and OS than that in non-IBC. In multivariate analysis, controlling for age, disease status at AHCT, hormonal receptor status, time from diagnosis to AHCT, and performance status at AHCT, patients with stage III IBC had higher mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 1-1.34, p= 0.0459), worse PFS (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01-1.36, p= 0.0339) and higher risk of disease relapse/progression (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.45, p= 0.0082) as compared to stage III non-IBC. Amongst all patients a higher stage disease was associated with worse PFS, OS and disease relapse/progression. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes of stage III IBC patients who underwent AHCT were poorer than that in non-IBC patients confirming that the poor prognosis of IBC even in the setting of HDC with AHCT.

Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare subtype of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for approximately 6% of all NHL. Currently, there is no standard first line induction therapy and initial therapy is based on patient age, performance status and physician preference. Limited information is available comparing outcomes of patients who achieve first complete remission (CR1) with low intensity regimens versus high intensity regimens followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult MCL patients who underwent ASCT in CR1. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the induction regimens: low intensity regimens ((R-CHOP, BR) versus high intensity regimens (Hyper-CVAD, Nordic Regimen, R-CHOP alternating with R-DHAP, R-DHAP). The primary objective was to compare relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and NRM (non-relapse mortality) between both groups. Results: Between January 2005 and December 2016, 66 patients with CR1 received R-BEAM conditioning regimen followed by ASCT. Twenty-five patients (38%) received low intensity regimens: R-CHOP (n=21, 84%) and BR (n=4; 16%). Forty one patients (62%) received high intensity regimens: Hyper-CVAD (n=28, 68%), Nordic regimen (n=9, 22%), R-CHOP alternating with R-DHAP (n=1, 2%) and Hyper-CVAD that was changed due to intolerability (1 changed to R-CHOP and 1 to BR, n=2, 4%). Patient characteristics are summarized in the table below. Twenty-three patients (92%) in the low intensity group and 39 patients (95%) in the high intensity group had stage 4 at diagnosis. Twenty-one patients (84%) in the low intensity group and 37 patients (90%) in the high intensity group had bone marrow involvement. Three patients (12%) in the low intensity group required G-CSF plus plerixafor versus 13 patients (32%) in high intensity gr group for stem cell mobilization (p=0.1). Median day for neutrophil engraftment was 11 days in both groups, and median day for platelet engraftment was 12 days and 18 days in low intensity and high intensity regimen groups, respectively (P=0.001). Median follow-up of surviving patients was 4.18 and 4.93 years for low intensity and high intensity regimen, respectively. For low intensity regimen and high intensity regimen groups, 1-year OS was 95.7% and 97.4%, respectively (P=0.59); 1-year RFS was 92% and 89.6%, respectively (P=0.88); 1-year relapse rate was 4% and 10.4%, respectively (P=0.25); and 1-year NRM was 4% and 0%, respectively (P=0.15). Multivariable analysis identified that older age was associated with worse OS (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21, P=0.004), KPS < 80% was associated with higher NRM (HR 25.1, 95% CI 8.51-74.16, P Conclusion: Our data showed no significant difference in transplant outcomes for patients who achieve CR1 with low intensity regimens when compared to high intensity regimens. Patients who received high intensity induction regimen required plerixafor more frequently for stem cell mobilization, but no difference in neutrophil or platelet engraftment was noted in the two groups. Disclosures Modi: MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Deol:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Introduction: Peri-transplant radiation (XRT) in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been associated with improved local control. However, this has not been well established with increased use of novel agents in peri-transplant setting. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of HL patients who underwent their first ASCT between 2000 and 2018 at Karmanos Cancer Institute in Detroit, Michigan. Peri-transplant radiation was defined as XRT within 3-month window of autologous transplant. Novel agents included brentuximab, check-point inhibitors (CIs), and other targeted agents. The primary endpoint was to compare overall survival (OS) based on utilization of peri-transplant XRT and novel agents with standard salvage chemotherapy. Secondary endpoint was to assess the OS benefit of novel agent use in the post-transplant setting. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit to assess associations between OS and nine prior chosen predictors (bulky relapse, pulmonary or bone marrow relapse, extranodal disease, CT/PET response [CR vs less than CR], novel salvage [anytime], peri-transplant XRT, site of relapse [local vs systemic], maintenance brentuximab, relapse after initial diagnosis [>1 year vs ≤1 year]). Results: From 2000-2018, there were total of 220 patients who underwent ASCT for HL. Patients underwent ASCT median of 575 days after initial diagnosis. 65 (30%) patients had XRT during initial treatment and XRT was utilized less frequently in all patients (13% vs 35%) and stage I-II patients (29% vs 46%) who were diagnosed after 2010. Peri-transplant XRT was used in 30 (14%) patients and was utilized similarly in patients who had ASCT before or after 2010 (13% vs 14%) (Figure 1). There was no difference in baseline characteristics (bulky relapse, local vs systemic relapse, etc.) of patients who did or did not receive peri-transplant XRT (Table 1). Novel salvage was used in 32 (15%) patients at any time before transplant (Figure 1). Median OS of all the patients who had ASCT was 11 years [7.6-NR] and PFS was 4.3 years [2.3-7.4]. Median OS of patients who had peri-transplant XRT was not reached [9.4-NR] compared to 7.7 [5.3-NR] years for those without peri-transplant XRT [HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.96; p=0.033] (Figure 2); on the contrary, there was no difference in PFS between the two groups. Median OS of patients who had novel salvage at any time was not reached [4.3-NR] compared to 11 [7.6-NR] years for those without novel salvage [HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.43-2.72; p=0.877]. Median OS of patients who had either novel salvage (anytime) or peri-transplant XRT was not reached [9.4-NR] compared to 11 years [6.5-NR] for those who had chemotherapy salvage only [HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.32-1.26; p=0.193]. In the multivariable analysis, less than CR to salvage therapy and lack of peri-transplant XRT use were associated with worse OS. There were total of 85 (39%) patients who progressed after ASCT. Median OS for those patients was 3.5 years [2.3-8.8] and PFS was 1 year [0.8-1.5] after relapse from ASCT. The median OS for patients who received novel agents (brentuximab 61%, CI 14%) during first progression after ASCT was 6.9 years [2.3-NR] after relapse from ASCT compared to 2.9 years [2.3-NR] for those that did not [HR 1.47; 95% CI 0.72-3; p=. 288]. In addition, the median OS for patients who received novel agent at any time after transplant was 6.9 years [2.6-NR] after relapse from ASCT compared to 2.5 years [2.2-7] for those who did not [HR 1.96; 95% CI 1-3.86; p=0.048] (Figure 3). Lastly, OS after relapse from ASCT was better if patients progressing on novel agent post-transplant received another novel agent for their successive therapy rather than any other treatment [HR 4.87; 95% CI 1.14-20.8; p=0.018]. Conclusions: We show that there was a lack of standardized patient selection for utilization of peri-transplant XRT and its use was similar before and after the novel agent era. Peri-transplant XRT was possibly used in patients who had residual disease or other high -risk features that could not be identified due to retrospective nature of this study and, despite this, use of peri-transplant XRT was associated with modest survival benefit. Surprisingly, use of novel agent at any time during salvage was not associated with survival benefit. Utilization of novel agents at any time after post-transplant progression was associated with OS benefit. Disclosures Deol: Kite: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Agios: Other: Advisory board.

NCT01246206. The study was approved by Wayne State University Institutional Review Board.

Information on the use of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) as a pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy in MDS is limited. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of 172 adult MDS patients, who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between January 2000 and December 2016. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 − pre-transplant blasts

7546 Background: Haploidentical transplant (HIDT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (pCY) is being increasingly used because of the universal availability of donor and rapid graft acquisition time. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is one of the commonly occurring complications in this population. The information on the impact of CRS on the post-HIDT outcomes is limited. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 91 patients who underwent HIDT between June 2012 and June 2019 for the onset and severity of CRS. CRS was graded per ASTCT guidelines. The primary objective was to compare RFS (relapse-free survival), NRM (non-relapse mortality), OS (overall survival) and GVHD in patients with no CRS, CRS grade 1-2 and 3-4. Results: All received peripheral blood stem cells and pCY/tacrolimus/mycophenolate as GVHD prophylaxis. Fifty-six (62%) received reduced intensity and 35 (38%) received full intensity conditioning regimen. Ten (10.9%) had no CRS, 74 (81.3%) developed grade 1-2 CRS and seven (7.7%) experienced grade 3-4 CRS. Median time to onset of CRS was one day post-transplant. The most common symptoms were fever (87%), fatigue (30%), nausea/vomiting (24%), rigors (24%), diarrhea (20%) and rash (11%). Fifteen (20%) with grade 1-2 and six (85%) with grade 3-4 CRS received tocilizumab. Day +100 cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD for no CRS, grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 CRS was 0%, 2.7%, and 14.3%, respectively (P = 0.36). One-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD for no CRS, grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 CRS was 30%, 31.9% and 14.3%, respectively (P = 0.70). One-year NRM for no CRS, grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 CRS was 30%, 16.5%, and 57.1%, respectively (P = 0.002). One-year RFS for no CRS, grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 CRS was 48%, 63.4% and 28.6%, respectively (p = 0.03). OS at 1-year for no CRS, grade 1-2 and grade 3-4 CRS was 60%, 73.9%, and 28.6%, respectively (P = 0.008). Multivariable analysis revealed that grade 3-4 CRS was associated with significantly higher NRM (HR 5.54, P = 0.002), worse RFS (HR 3.41, P = 0.011) and worse OS (HR 4.91, P = 0.001). Conditioning regimen, degree of HLA match and disease risk index did not affect post-transplant outcomes and were not predictors for developing CRS. Conclusions: Our study showed that grade 3-4 CRS was associated with inferior post-transplant outcomes. However, no impact on acute or chronic GVHD was noted. Therefore, early recognition and prompt management of CRS may help improve outcomes.

7545 Background: Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (pCY) when given at 50mg/kg on day +3 and +4 in haploidentical donor transplants (HIDT) leads to considerable morbidity. Information on its toxicity and impact on outcomes is limited. Methods: We analyzed 91 patients (pt) undergoing HIDT with pCY to estimate incidence and risk factors of mucositis, hemorrhagic cystitis, renal and cardiac toxicities during the first 6 months after transplant and its impact on overall survival (OS). We compared these complications with 91 pt who were matched for age, disease, disease status at transplant, conditioning regimen and received 8/8 HLA-matched transplants without pCY (non-pCY cohort). Results: Fourteen pt (15%) in non-pCY and 28 (31%) in pCY experienced hypoxia requiring oxygen (p = 0.03). Ten pt (11%) in non-pCY and 21 (23%) in pCY developed clinically significant hypotension (p = 0.05). Day +100 cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of mucositis was 59.3% for non-pCY and 84.6% for pCY (p < 0.001). Seven pt (13%) in non-pCY cohort and 39 (51%) in pCY developed grade 3-4 mucositis (p < 0.001). Two pt (2%) in non-pCY and 22 (24%) in pCY developed gross hematuria (p = 0.05). Day +180 CIR of hemorrhagic cystitis was 13.2% for non-pCY and 29.7% for pCY (p = 0.005). Hemorrhagic cystitis did not have an adverse impact on non-relapse mortality (NRM) and OS. Day +180 CIR of renal toxicities was 17.6% for non-pCY and 28.6% for pCY (p = 0.10). The CIR of cardiac toxicities at day +180 was 9.9% for non-pCY and 14.3% for pCY (p = 0.34). Congestive heart failure (59%) and atrial fibrillation (36%) were the most common cardio-toxicities. One-year NRM was 38.5% in pt developing cardio-toxicity in the pCY cohort compared to no cardio-toxicity (15.3% in non-pCY and 18.3% in pCY, p = 0.004). OS was inferior in pt with cardio-toxicity in non-pCY (HR 5.49, p < 0.001) and pCY (HR 2.3, p = 0.03) compared to pt without cardio-toxicity. In multivariable analysis, pCY was associated with an increased risk of mucositis (HR 1.48, p = 0.03), and hemorrhagic cystitis (HR 2.67, p = 0.004). The number of infused CD34 cells was associated an increased risk of cardiac toxicity (HR 1.13, p = 0.005). pCY was not associated with higher cardiac complications, and no impact of the number of infused CD34 cells, conditioning regimen and prior transplant was observed on hemorrhagic cystitis and mucositis. Conclusions: pCY was associated with significant morbidity compared to HLA-matched non-pCY cohort. Although cardio-toxicities were similar between both groups, it was associated with worse survival.

e13094 Background: The role of High Dose Chemotherapy (HDC) with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in treatment of high risk locally advanced breast cancer remains unclear. This modality stopped being used for breast cancer treatment when trials in early 2000s reported Disease Free Survival (DFS) benefit but no Overall survival (OS) benefit. However, subgroup analyses of these studies reported OS benefit in young and Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC). We report very long-term outcomes of high risk locally advanced TNBC treated with HDC-ASCT at our institution between 1995 and 2001. Methods: We reviewed our BMT database for women with stage IIB or III TNBC treated with HDC-ASCT. We excluded women with hormone positive, Her2/Neu positive/Unknown and metastatic disease prior to transplant per updated AJCC 7th edition. The majority of patients underwent surgery followed by adjuvant Anthracycline and Taxane based induction chemotherapy followed by HDC-ASCT for consolidation. The HDC regimen consisted of Carmustine 600 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide 5.6gm/ m2 and Cisplatin 165mg/ m2 (STAMP 1 regimen). Four patients received induction regimen as neoadjuvant and HDC-ASCT as adjuvant treatment per the same protocol. All patients received loco-regional radiation after ASCT. Results: 29 patients had locally advanced TNBC treated with HDC-ASCT. Median age at diagnosis was 43 years (IQR 40-51). 28 had at least 4 positive lymph nodes. Median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 5 months. Median overall survival was 17 years (95% CI, 3-19 years), and median DFS was 14 years (95% CI, 1-19). There was no treatment related mortality (TRM) at 30- and 100-days post ASCT. 12 patients (41%) were alive at median of 16 years (95% CI, 12-19) post ASCT. Conclusions: This single institution study of locally advanced high risk TNBC patients who received HDC-ASCT as part of treatment demonstrates a high long term OS exceeded historical controls. This supports a potential role for HDC-ASCT in this cohort of high risk TNBC. Considering the low TRM associated with this approach, prospective evaluation of this strategy is warranted.

Introduction Failure to achieve morphological complete remission occurs in 30% AML patients resulting in dismal outcomes. Data addressing influence of pre-transplant PDL-1 status on post-transplant outcomes is limited. We hypothesize that PDL-1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) prior to transplantation may predict a poor outcome. Methods This was a retrospective, observational single center pilot study involving refractory AML patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) at Karmanos Cancer Institute from 01/01/2012 to 01/01/2018. A planned sample size of 24 patients were selected and assigned to two cohorts based on their respective responses to ASCT: a) poor responders: persistent leukemia by bone marrow biopsy within 30 days of ASCT, and b) good responders: no evidence of leukemia at 1-year post-transplant. Descriptive analyses evaluated differences in demographic, disease and treatment variables. FISH assay was used to evaluate PDL-1 alterations in the pre-transplant archival, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded bone marrow biopsy specimens including frequency and magnitude of 9p24.1 alterations— low-level disomy, polysomy, copy gain, and amplification. The expression of PD-L1 was evaluated by IHC in a semi-quantitative (0 through +3) manner. Results Of the total 24 patients, 12 patients were poor responders and 12 were good responders; among poor responders, median age was 58 years (range, 31- 72) and gender distribution was 1:1. Seven patients (58%) had prior MDS, Myelofibrosis or CMML, while five patients had de-novo AML. Treatment information is provided in table 1. At pre-transplant bone marrow biopsy assessment, median number of bone marrow and peripheral blood blast counts were 8.1% (1.7-37) and 2% (0-37), respectively. Bone marrow cytogenetics assessed prior to transplant included intermediate risk in 2 (17%) and high risk disease in 9 (75%) patients and one patient without cytogenetic evaluation. PD-L1 expression was negative by IHC in all samples, but FISH testing was positive in 3 of 12 (25%) poor responders, characterized by copy gain. In good responders, median age was 59 years (range, 43-70) with a 3:2 male predominance. Four patients (25%) had prior MDS or Myelofibrosis and 8 had de-novo AML. Five patients (42%) had intermediate risk and 7 (58%) had high-risk cytogenetics. At pre-transplant bone marrow biopsy assessment, median number of bone marrow and peripheral blast counts were 6% (1-40) and 1% (0-7), respectively. PD-L1 expression was negative by both IHC and FISH examination in this cohort. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that PDL-1 expression by FISH was specifically detected in 25% of patients with poor responders following ASCT, which could possibly provide an insight into the poor outcome. A larger sample will be required to validate this observation in this population.

Introduction: Post-transplant relapse and GVHD are two major barriers of success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for AML. These outcomes are often dependent on the complex interaction between the post-transplant immunosuppression and the conditioning regimen. We as well as others have used rabbit thymoglobulin for the reduction of both acute and chronic GVHD in unrelated transplant in AML. The interaction between different conditioning regimens and thymoglobulin may play an important role in the outcomes, but it has not been fully investigated. In this study, we compared outcomes of patients undergoing unrelated donor AHSCT for AML using thymoglobulin with either a myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning regimen. Patients received busulfan/fludarabine (Bu/Flu)-based myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen with 4 days of busulfan or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen using 2 days of busulfan with fludarabine. Since 2 days of busulfan as RIC may have a higher relapse rate, we added low dose TBI (200cGY) to the RIC regimen (Bu/Flu/TBI). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of adult AML patients who underwent unrelated donor AHSCT utilizing tacrolimus, mycophenolate (MMF) and thymoglobulin as GVHD prophylaxis. All patients received either a Bu/Flu/TBI-based RIC or a Bu/Fu-based MAC regimen. Thymoglobulin was administered at a total dose of 4.5mg/kg in divided fashion (0.5mg/kg on day-3, 1.5mg/kg on day -2, 2.5mg/kg on day -1). Tacrolimus and MMF were started on day -3. The objectives were to determine the rates of acute and chronic GVHD, overall survival (OS), relapse free survival (RFS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) using Cox proportional hazard regression and competing risk models. Results: One hundred twenty-two patients with AML received unrelated donor AHSCT between January 2005 and December 2017. Of these, 88 (72%) patients had de-novo and 34 (28%) had secondary AML. Sixty-four patients received Bu/Flu/TBI-based RIC, and 58 received Bu/Flu as MAC regimen. All patients received peripheral blood stem cells. The patients receiving RIC regimen were older (median age 66 vs 53 years, p The 6-month cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of grade III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was 6% in RIC and 26% in MAC regimen (p=0.004). The 2-year CIR of chronic extensive GVHD was 35% and 29% in RIC and MAC regimen, respectively (p=0.50). Median follow-up of surviving patients after RIC and MAC regimen was 4.4 years and 4 years, respectively. Two-year OS after RIC and MAC regimen was 50% and 49%, respectively (p=0.69). Two-year relapse rate with RIC and MAC was 37% and 24%, respectively (p=0.25), whereas two-year NRM with RIC and MAC was 21% and 31%, respectively (p=0.41). Two-year RFS was 43% with RIC and 45% with MAC regimen (p=0.80). In all, CMV and EBV reactivation rates were 34% and 7%, respectively. Eight patients (7%) developed gastrointestinal CMV disease. Multivariable analysis revealed that relapsed and refractory AML at AHSCT was associated with adverse OS (HR 1.71, p=0.04), RFS (HR 1.84, p=0.01) and higher NRM (SHR 2.96, p=0.006) compared to first complete remission. Secondary AML was associated with higher NRM (HR 2.44, p=0.02). No impact of HLA matching and conditioning regimen on OS, relapse, NRM and RFS was observed. Subgroup analysis showed that HLA matching had an interaction with the conditioning regimen for RFS (p=0.03). Otherwise, none of the factors appeared to have any significant interaction with the conditioning regimen for survival outcomes. Conclusion: Our study shows that thymoglobulin when used with lower dose of busulfan (in the form of Bu/Flu/TBI-based RIC regimen) provided significantly lower rate of acute GVHD compared to Bu/Flu-based MAC in AML patients undergoing unrelated donor AHSCT without affecting leukemia-free and overall survival. Disease status at transplant remains a significant predictor of post-transplant outcomes. Disclosures Deol: Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Kite: Other: Advisory board; Agios: Other: Advisory board.

Introduction: Rabbit thymoglobulin, an in-vivo T-cell depleting agent, is widely used as a part of GVHD prophylaxis regimen. Current dosing of thymoglobulin is often weight based and does not consider patient related factors. This results in highly variable exposure of thymoglobulin. Although higher doses (>7mg/kg) of thymoglobulin have shown to reduce the risk of GVHD, it is associated with increased rate of opportunistic infections and disease recurrence. Conversely, lower dose (2.5mg/kg) of thymoglobulin is associated with increased risk of GVHD. Thus, optimum dosing of thymoglobulin remains undefined. We hypothesized that recipient peripheral blood ALC on the first day of thymoglobulin infusion would interact with the dose of thymoglobulin administered and predict post-transplant outcomes. We plan to identify association of thymoglobulin dose with the ALC on the first day of thymoglobulin. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes of adult patients (pts) who underwent matched unrelated donor AHSCT and received tacrolimus, mycophenolate (cellcept) and thymoglobulin as GVHD prophylaxis. Thymoglobulin was given at a total dose of 4.5mg/kg in divided fashion (0.5mg/kg on day -3, 1.5mg/kg on day -2 and 2.5mg/kg on day -1). The objectives were to determine rate of GVHD, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse rate and non-relapse mortality (NRM) following AHSCT using Cox proportional hazard regression and competing risk models. Results: Between January 2005 and December 2017, 217 pts underwent AHSCT. The most common indications for AHSCT were AML (n=95, 44%), MDS (n=57, 26%), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=23, 11%), and ALL (n=22, 10%). Median age of pts was 60 years (range, 18-79). All pts received peripheral blood stem cells. Ninety-eight pts (45%) received full intensity conditioning regimen and 119 pts (55%) received reduced intensity regimen. The median ALC on the first day of thymoglobulin administration was 200 K/cubic millimeter. The 6-month cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of grade III-IV acute GVHD was 14.8% and the 2-year CIR of chronic extensive GVHD was 35.4%. With a median follow up of 3.82 years for surviving patients, the 2-year RFS, OS, relapse and NRM were 50%, 57.1, 20.1%, and 30.2%, respectively. CMV and EBV reactivation rates were 37% and 11%, respectively. Four pts developed CMV disease. By our lowest ALC cutoff of 100 K/cubic millimeter, pts were divided into two groups (ALC ≤ 100 vs. ALC > 100). Multivariable analysis revealed that ALC > 100 was associated with significantly superior OS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.79, p=0.002), RFS (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.33-0.74, p=0.001) and lower NRM (SHR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.97, p=0.038) and marginally lower relapse rate (SHR 0.57, 95% CI 0.31-1.05, p=0.070). In addition, higher infused total nucleated cells was associated with higher NRM (SHR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02-2.83, p=0.041). No impact of disease risk index, KPS, conditioning regimen, infused CD34 cells on NRM, relapse, RFS or OS was observed. Conclusion: Our study indicates that ALC ≤ 100 is associated with adverse post-transplant outcomes when thymoglobulin dose of 4.5mg/kg is used for in-vivo T cell depletion. This finding may indicate that in pts with lower ALC, thymoglobulin dose may need to be adjusted to optimize its efficacy and avoid toxicities. In the future prospective studies, which evaluate dose reduction of thymoglobulin in pts with low ALC need to be planned to confirm these results. Disclosures Deol: Agios: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Kite: Other: Advisory board.

Introduction: Low dose lenalidomide as a maintenance therapy after the first autologous transplant (autoSCT) has been shown to improve progression free survival (PFS) and possibly overall survival (OS) in standard-risk multiple myeloma (MM). Proteasome inhibitor-based maintenance therapy provides an alternative to lenalidomide and offers PFS and OS advantage in high-risk MM. Most recently oral ixazomib as a maintenance therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of progression by 28%. Despite the advances in maintenance therapy after first autoSCT, no prospective or retrospective studies exist evaluating efficacy of maintenance therapy after second autoSCT. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the impact of maintenance therapy after second autoSCT. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes of adult MM patients (pts) who received maintenance therapy following second autoSCT. Lenalidomide dose up to 15mg daily and subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 every 2 weeks were considered maintenance therapy. The pts who received higher doses or combinational therapy as maintenance were excluded. We compared outcomes between pts who did and did not receive maintenance therapy following second autoSCT. The objectives were to determine OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse rate and non-relapse mortality (NRM) with maintenance therapy following second autoSCT using Cox regression and competing risk models. Results: Between January 2000 and December 2018, 117 pts underwent second autoSCT and met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 39 received maintenance therapy and 78 did not. Median time between first and second autoSCT was 57 months (range, 4.9-124.2) in the maintenance group and 46 months (range, 3.7-193.5) in the no-maintenance group (p=0.32). Disease status at second autoSCT was complete response (CR) (n=7, 6%), very good partial response (VGPR) (n=22, 19%), partial response (PR) (n=30, 26%), stable (n=21, 18%) and progressive disease (n=32, 27%). Melphalan-based preparative regimen was used in 87% of pts, and BEAM was used in 13% of pts. All pts successfully engrafted and median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 11 and 19 days, respectively. Maintenance therapy after second autoSCT was started at a median day of 105 (range, 62-317). Lenalidomide-based maintenance therapy was commonly used in 23 (59%) pts, and bortezomib as maintenance was used in 16 (41%) pts. Sixteen pts received maintenance therapy after both first and second autoSCT, and 23 received second maintenance only. Median duration of second maintenance therapy was 16 months (range, 8.7-26.5). The best response during maintenance was CR (n=8, 21%), VGPR (n=20, 51%), PR (n=9, 23%), and stable disease (n=2, 5%). Median follow-up for OS was 48 and 60 months in the maintenance and no-maintenance group, respectively. Median OS was not reached in the maintenance group and was 40.8 months in the no-maintenance group (HR 2.32, p=0.02). At 3-year, maintenance group had superior RFS (18% vs 12%; HR 1.65, p=0.03), lower relapse rate (69 vs 81%; SHR 0.58, p=0.02). Median time to progression was 24 months in the maintenance group and 14 months in the no-maintenance group (p=0.04). Although limited by small numbers, we did not observe any impact of cytogenetics at diagnosis on OS and RFS after second autoSCT. RFS was superior with lenalidomide-based maintenance compared to bortezomib-based maintenance (HR 2.17, p=0.05). However, OS was not different. The multivariable analysis revealed that maintenance after second autoSCT was associated with significantly superior OS (HR 0.38, p=0.01), RFS (HR 0.59, p=0.03) and lower relapse rate (SHR 0.63, p=0.04). The common reasons for maintenance therapy discontinuation were disease progression (n=20, 51%), side effects (n=7, 18%), and unknown (n=12, 31%). A total of 10/39 pts who received maintenance therapy and 44/77 pts who did not receive maintenance have died. Conclusion: This is the first study showing efficacy of maintenance therapy after second autoSCT. Maintenance therapy after second autoSCT significantly improved overall and relapsed-free survival and should be considered in all pts after second transplant. Our study also reveals real world practice pattern of using variable dose of maintenance therapy among physicians. Disclosures Deol: Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Kite: Other: Advisory board; Agios: Other: Advisory board.

A phase I trial of infusing anti-CD3 × anti-CD20 bispecific antibody (CD20Bi) armed activated T cells (aATC) was conducted in high-risk/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients to determine whether aATC infusions are safe, affect immune recovery, and induce an antilymphoma effect. Ex vivo expanded ATC from 12 patients were armed with anti-CD20 bispecific antibody, cryopreserved, and infused after autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). Patients underwent SCT after high-dose chemotherapy, and aATC infusions were started on day +4. The patients received 1 infusion of aATC per week for 4 weeks after SCT with doses of 5, 10, 15, and 20 × 109. aATC infusions were safe and did not impair engraftment. The major side effects were chills, fever, hypotension, and fatigue. The mean number of IFN-γ Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Spots (ElSpots) directed at CD20 positive lymphoma cells (DAUDI, P = .0098) and natural killer cell targets (K562, P < .0051) and the mean specific cytotoxicity directed at DAUDI (P = .037) and K562 (P = .002) from pre-SCT to post-SCT were significantly higher. The increase in IFN-γ EliSpots from pre-SCT to post-SCT in patients who received armed ATC after SCT were significantly higher than those in patients who received SCT alone (P = .02). Serum IL-7, IL-15, Macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1 beta, IP-10, MIP-1α, and Monokine induced by gamma interferone increased within hours after infusion. Polyclonal and specific antibodies were near normal 3 months after SCT. aATC infusions were safe and increased innate and specific antilymphoma cell immunity without impairing antibody recovery after SCT.

Lenalidomide (LEN) is a relatively new and very effective therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). Prior LEN therapy is associated with an increased risk of peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC) failure, particularly with filgrastim (G-CSF) alone. We performed a retrospective chart review of 319 consecutive MM patients who underwent apheresis to collect PBSCs for the first autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).The median number of PBSCs collected in the LEN (+) group was significantly less than the LEN (-) group (6.34 vs. 7.52 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg; p = 0.0004). In addition, the median number of apheresis sessions required for adequate PBSCs collection were significantly more in the LEN (+) group as compared to LEN (-) group (2 vs. 1 sessions; p = 0.002). In the LEN (+) group, there was a negative correlation between PBSCs collected and prior number of cycles of LEN (p = 0.0001). Rate of PBSC collection failure was 9% in the LEN (+) group and 5% in the LEN (-) group (p = 0.16). Only six patients who failed PBSC collection with G-CSF were able to collect adequate PBSCs with G-CSF + plerixafor. LEN exposure had no effect on neutrophil or platelet recovery post-ASCT.Up to four cycles of LEN exposure have minimal negative impact on PBSC collection. Despite prolong exposure of LEN, PBSC collection was adequate for two ASCTs in the majority of patients and post-ASCT engraftment was not longer than expected; however, clinical relevance (complication rate, quality of life, cost) of prolonged LEN exposure on both PBSC and ASCT, should be evaluated in prospective clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Impact of Plerixafor (P) mobilized stem cells on immune reconstitution of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) patients has not been established. Early lymphocyte recovery (Absolute lymphocyte count of > 1 K/uL at day 30 after transplant) has been established to predict outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate lymphocyte recovery in MM patients who underwent ASCT with stem cells mobilized with G-CSF vs G-CSF+P. Secondary objective was to evaluate the survival outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of MM patients who underwent first ASCT between 2008 and 2016 with either G-CSF or G-CSF+P mobilization at Karmanos Cancer Institute in Detroit, Michigan. Plerixafor was used per institutional guidelines when the peripheral CD-34+ve cell-count was < 20/ uL on day 5 of G-CSF mobilization. 610 total patients were identified. Mobilization agents used were G-CSF alone (n= 469) or G-CSF+P (n= 141). All patients underwent transplant after Melphalan (M) conditioning and dose of M was at treating physician's discretion (140 vs 200 mg/m2). The primary endpoint was the Absolute Lymphocyte Count at day 30 (ALC30). Secondary endpoints were PFS and OS Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit to assess associations between ten pre chosen predictors( age, race, stage at diagnosis, doublet vs. triplet therapy, lines of treatment, disease status, mobilization agents, melphalan dose, ALC at day 30, post- transplant maintenance) and survival benefit (PFS and OS). RESULTS: Median age of patients was older in G-CSF+P group (62 vs 60 years, p=. 006) and they were more likely to receive triplet therapy (82 vs 72%, p=. 015) for induction compared to G-CSF group (Table 1). Patients in G-CSF group were more likely to receive greater than one line of treatment before transplant (p=. 006). Disease status at transplant was similar between the two groups. G-CSF patients received higher dose of M (at 200mg/ m2) more frequently (69 vs. 58%, p = 0.010) and median cell dose infused was higher in G-CSF group (3.19 vs 2.88 x106 CD 34+ve-cells/Kg, p= 0.001). Primary endpoint, ALC30, was 1.3 K/uL(.1-4.5) and 1.2 K/uL(.1-5.1) for G-CSF and G-CSF+P, respectively (p=. 608). Median day to neutrophil recovery were similar in both groups (ANC of 500 at Day 12). Post-transplant maintenance use was similar between the two groups. The median PFS was 2.46 years (95% CI, 2.14 to 3.15) and 2.77 years (95% CI, 1.99 to 3.27) for G-CSF and G-CSF+P, respectively (HR: 1.128; 95% CI, (.843-1.509); p=. 417) (Figure 1). The median OS was 6.09 years (95% CI, 4.55 to NR) and 3.73 years (95% CI, 3.20 to NR) for G-CSF and G-CSF+P, respectively (HR: 1.638; 95% CI, (1.118-2.399); p=. 011) (Figure 2) .In MVA, higher stage at diagnosis, less than PR before ASCT, and no post-transplant maintenance therapy were associated with worse PFS and OS. More lines of treatment adversely impacted PFS. Use of G-CSF+P for mobilization and Melphalan dose ≤ 200-mg/ m2 adversely impacted OS. ALC30 did not impact PFS or OS in MVA. There were no significant differences in causes of death among the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, retrospective analysis of MM patients mobilized with G-CSF vs G-CSF + P, there was no significant difference in lymphocyte recovery. Higher Melphalan dose resulted in improved OS in the MVA. There was an overall survival difference favoring the G-CSF group, however, differences in baseline characteristics not accounted for in the MVA may be responsible for this observation. A Prospective study comparing these mobilization regimens including patients with similar baseline characteristics is necessary to confirm this finding. Disclosures Deol: Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Background: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is an important modality in the management of many hematologic malignancies. The first step for patients who are candidates for AHSCT is adequate stem cell collection. Recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) is used for stem cell mobilization. Plerixafor has been used to increase the yield of mobilized stem cells, either upfront or pre-emptively when pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell count is low. In the last few years, biosimilar G-CSF (Zarxio®) has become available. Although biosimilar G-CSF may reduce mobilization costs when used alone, the effect on use of additional mobilization agents like plerixafor has not been well studied. Therefore, we investigated whether there was a difference in the rate of Plerixafor usage among patients who were mobilized using biosimilar G-CSF (Zarxio®) compared to the original G-CSF (Neupogen®). Methods: This was a retrospective single institution study. We utilized the Karmanos Cancer Insitute's blood and marrow transplantation database to collect data on patients who underwent stem cell mobilization for AHSCT using either Neupogen® (N) or Zarxio® (Z), between January 2015 and June 2017. Per institutional policy, patients received G-CSF 10µg/Kg for 5 days and received Plerixafor if peripheral CD34+ cell count on the first planned day of collection was < 20/uL. The target CD34+ stem cell dose for AHSCT was 2 x 106/kg. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare two groups for continuous variables and Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Logistic regression models were used to assess associations between six pre-specified predictors (mobilization, age, radiation therapy, median WBC/ platelet count prior to initiation of mobilization and disease status at time of mobilization) and transplant status. Results: A total of 370 patients underwent stem cell mobilization during the study period. N was used for mobilization in 197 patients while Z was used in 173 patients. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Median age was 61 years (18-78). There were no significant differences in the baseline patient characteristics other than slightly lower median WBC count prior to mobilization, in patients who received N for mobilization. The indication for stem cell mobilization was Multiple myeloma (67%), Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (21%), Hodgkin Lymphoma (8%) and Amyloidosis (4%). There was no statistically significant difference in plerixafor utilization between the two groups (45% in N group vs 43% in Z group (p-value: 0.794). There was also no difference between the groups in the peripheral CD34+ cell count on firts planned day of collection, number of collected stem cells, total days of apheresis, need for a second mobilization, rate of transplant and duration of transplant hospitalization (Table 2). In MVA, older age and platelet count < 100 were the only 2 factors which adversely impacted the possibility for a patient to proceed to transplant (Table 3). Conclusion: There was no difference in plerixafor utilization among the two groups. Previously recognized risk factors like older age and low platelet count were identified as risk factors for not being able to undergo an AHSCT. The cost of biosimilar is about 50% less than the original G-CSF and based on our analysis of a large number of patients at a single institution, biosimilar G-CSF provides significant cost savings for stem cell mobilization. Disclosures Deol: Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Introduction: Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma represents a heterogeneous group of lymphoid malignancies characterized by poor prognosis with 5-year overall survival (OS) about 25% with conventional chemotherapy. Autologous stem cell transplant (Auto-SCT), as consolidation, is often considered in first complete remission (CR), providing between 30 to 40% long term disease-free survival. However, patients receiving Auto-SCT in second CR or with refractory disease have poor outcomes with progression-free survival ranging from 15-20% to 0%, respectively. In such cases, allogeneic stem cell transplant (Allo-SCT) may provide long term disease control. We intended to study outcomes of Allo-SCT in peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients. Methods: We have retrospectively evaluated long-term outcomes of adult peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients at Karmanos Cancer Institute. The objectives were to determine GVHD rate, overall survival (OS), relapse rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) following Allo-SCT. Results: Between January 2005 and December 2017, 39 patients underwent Allo-SCT. The different diagnoses included peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not-otherwise-specified (n=16), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n=8), anaplastic T-cell lymphoma (n=8), hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (n=2), cutaneous T-cell (n=3) and NK cell lymphoma (n=2). The median age at transplant was 50 years (range, 21-67). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-5) and 12 patients (31%) had failed prior Auto-SCT. Sixteen patients (41%) were in CR and 2 (5%) were in partial remission at the time of Allo-SCT, whereas 12 (31%) patients had relapsed disease and 9 (23%) had refractory disease. Twenty-one patients (54%) received matched related and 18 patients (46%) had unrelated Allo-SCT. Myeloablative conditioning regimen was used in 22 patients (56%), whereas reduced intensity regimen was used in 17 (44%) patients. Grade III-IV acute GVHD occurred in 25.6% (95% CI, 13.2-40.1%) and chronic GVHD occurred in 41% (95% CI, 25.1-56.3%). After a median follow-up of 3.08 years (95% CI, 2.49-7.28) among surviving patients, the estimated probabilities of 3-year OS and PFS were 35.9% (95% CI, 22.4-57.6%) and 32.5% (95% CI, 19.9-53%), respectively. The 3-year relapse rate was 23.9% (95% CI, 11.5-38.7%), whereas NRM was 35.9% (95% CI, 21.1-50.9%). No difference in OS and PFS was noticed in patients receiving Allo-SCT in first CR compared with patients receiving Allo-SCT beyond first CR (p=0.81; p=0.94). Similarly, no difference in OS and PFS was noted in patients with Allo-SCT followed by failed prior Auto-SCT compared with patients with upfront Allo-SCT (p=0.31; p=0.47). Seventeen of 39 patients were alive and 22 were deceased (n=7 disease relapse; n=15 NRM). Out of 39 patients, 13 (33%) alive patients are free of relapse and GVHD as of data analysis. Conclusion: Our study suggests that Allo-SCT is a viable treatment option for peripheral T-cell lymphoma and appears to provide cure in these highly selected patients. The survival advantage was noted in patients beyond first remission; therefore, it should be considered in all transplant eligible patients. In addition, certain proportion of patients who failed prior Auto-SCT benefited from Allo-SCT, which points towards potential role of graft-versus-lymphoma effect. Disclosures Deol: Novartis: Consultancy; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Introduction: About 40-45% of relapsed chemo-sensitive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients achieve long term survival with autologous transplant (autoSCT). However, the outcomes of patients who fail autoSCT are extremely poor. In addition, patients with high risk DLBCL and refractory disease have lower chances of response to autoSCT. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) could be a viable option in these circumstances, in part due to cytoreductive effect of conditioning regimen and graft-versus-lymphoma effect. Here we report outcomes of DLBCL patients who received alloSCT in upfront settings or following failed autoSCT. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes of adult DLBCL patients at Karmanos Cancer institute. The objectives were to determine rate of GVHD, overall survival (OS), relapse rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) following alloSCT. Results: Between January 2005 and December 2017, 81 patients underwent alloSCT. Of these, 73 patients had de novo, 7 had transformed DLBCL and one had testicular involvement. The median age at transplant was 52 years (range, 21-68). The median number of treatments prior to alloSCT was 3 (range, 1-6). Twenty-four patients (30%) had prior failed autoSCT, and 57 (70%) had upfront alloSCT. Disease status at transplant were: complete remission in 22 patients (27%), partial remission in 6 (7%), relapse in 31 (38%) and refractory in 22 (27%). Thirty-three patients (41%) underwent matched related and 48 (59%) had matched unrelated alloSCT. CNS and bone marrow involvement at the time of transplant were noted in 10% and 47% of patients, respectively. Patients received following conditioning regimens: R-BEAM (58%), BU-FLU-TBI (27%), BU-FLU (2%), CY-TBI (2%), BU-CY (2%), CY-FLU-TBI (2%), and others (5%). With a median follow-up of 5 years (95% CI, 4.01-9.89), the cumulative incidences of grade III-IV acute GVHD at 6-month and chronic GVHD at 1-year were 27.2% (95% CI, 18-37.2%) and 37% (95% CI, 26.5-47.6%), respectively. At 1-year, OS was 48% (95% CI, 38.4-60.3%), PFS was 43.2% (95% CI, 33.6-55.4%) and GRFS was 13.5% (95% CI, 7.8-23.5%). One-year relapse rate was 24.7% (95% CI, 15.9-34.5%), and NRM was 32.1% (95% CI, 22.2-42.4%). Sixteen patients (20%) patients were alive without chronic GVHD and relapse. Relapse disease at the time of transplant was associated with higher post-transplant relapse rate, and poor performance status was adversely associated with OS and PFS. No effect of prior autoSCT, conditioning regimen or type of donor was found in multivariable analysis on OS, PFS, relapse and NRM. Twenty-seven out of 81 patients (33%) were alive at the time of data analysis. Causes of death included relapse (37%), infection (31%), acute GVHD (13%) and multiorgan failure (11%). Conclusion: Our study indicates that alloSCT provides long-term survival in these high-risk patients with low relapse rate; although non-relapse mortality was high in this group where about a third had failed prior autoSCT. Disclosures Deol: Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Aprepitant (AP) is a known inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 which may affect tacrolimus metabolism. We retrospectively examined the effect of oral AP on intravenous tacrolimus concentrations in 26 patients undergoing reduced intensity transplantation from 09/2005 to 09/2006. Oral AP 125 mg daily was administered on transplant day +1 and 80 mg on days +2 and +3. Intravenous tacrolimus was administered as a 0.03 mg/kg/day continuous infusion on day -6 through day +1 (pre-AP), during-AP (days +2 to +7), and post-AP starting on day +8. Tacrolimus doses were adjusted to achieve concentrations of 5—20 ng/mL. Dose-corrected tacrolimus concentrations (ng/mL/mg per dose) in the pre-AP, during-AP, and post-AP time periods were: 8.12 (95% CI: 7.3—9.1), 11.63 (95% CI: 9.63—13.63), and 11.42 (95% CI: 8.12—14.7), respectively (P

Background Salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is increasingly used for eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM) for progress after conventional chemotherapy. We recently used BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning for patients with myeloma receiving salvage ASCT whose disease progressed after a first ASCT with high-dose melphalan (HDM). We report safety and efficacy of BEAM salvage ASCT in MM in comparison with HDM-based salvage ASCT. Patients and Methods Between 2008 and 2013, 43 consecutive patients received salvage ASCT for MM (19 with HDM; 24 with BEAM). Results The BEAM group had a higher incidence of infections, intensive level of care, and fever (19 vs. 13 patients; P = .02), whereas the melphalan group had a higher incidence of mucositis (7 vs. 2 patients; P = .03). Other toxicities were not different. There was no significant difference in disease status and response rate before and after salvage ASCT between the 2 groups. The median time of follow-up after salvage ASCT was 5 and 9 months and the median progression-free survival (PFS) times were 7.7 and 12.1 months ( P = .82) for BEAM and melphalan, respectively. Conclusion BEAM seemed to be associated with higher toxicity with comparable efficacy to HDM ASCT. Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether there is any significant difference in PFS between the 2 groups.

e12590 Background: Adjuvant high dose chemotherapy (HDC) with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AuSCT) as part treatment of high risk locally advanced breast cancer has remained controversial. Multiple trials reported disease free survival (DFS) without Overall survival (OS) resulting in its abandonment in early 2000s. However, post hoc analysis of these trials consistently reported DFS and OS benefit in young and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subgroups. This has not been re-evaluated till date. Recent European registry reports coupled with improved transplant related mortality (TRM) and still poor out-come of standard of care in TNBC subgroup has generated renewed interest. We report long term out-come of locally advanced high risk TNBC treated with HDC and AuSCT treated in Karmanos Cancer Institute from 1995 to 2001 Methods: Majority of the patients were treated with Adriamycin and Taxane based induction chemotherapy. Patients without evidence of metastatic disease proceeded to HDC and AuSCT using Carmustine 600mg/sqm Cyclophosphamide 5.6gm/sqm and Cisplatin 165mg/sqm (STAMP 1 regimen). This is followed with loco- regional radiation per protocol. Results: 72 hormone negative patients with Lymph Node(LN) > 4 or inflammatory breast cancers were selected from 576 treated for advanced or metastatic breast cancer. 33 patients were TNB with HER2 status of 39 patients unknown. Median time from diagnosis to stem cell transplantation was 6 months. Median age at diagnosis was 47yrs. Mean LN involvement was 9 with 90% having (4-20) LN positivity. With median follow up of 16 years,10yrs DFS and OS were both 62.5%. Median follow up for DFS and OS was not reached.TRM was 9% mostly from pulmonary toxicity. Conclusions: This study of locally advanced high risk TNBC treated with adjuvant HDC and AuSCT have high 10yr OS of 62.5% compared to current standard of care. With the current improvement in TRM, reevaluation of this strategy through clinical trials in this subgroup whose outcome remain poor is reasonable.

e18540 Background: In spite of the fact G-CSF has been used post stem cell transplant (SCT) to accelerate neutrophil engraftment its use post allogeneic SCT remains controversial. ASCO does not recommend its use after allogeneic SCT. To further evaluate the effectiveness of its use, we compared outcomes in pts who underwent related and unrelated peripheral blood SCT(PBSCT) either with or without the use of G-CSF post SCT. Methods: This is a retrospective study comparing early outcomes in pts who received G-CSF starting on day + 6 post SCT until engraftment with pts who did not receive a planned course of G-CSF. Pts who underwent Allogeneic PBSCT between 2012-2014 at our institution were included. Pts who received marrow, haploidentical or cord blood transplants were excluded. Associations with survival outcomes were assessed by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional regression models. Results: A total of 162 patients were evaluated. Sixty-five pts received G-CSF post SCT and 97 did not. The only difference between the two groups was that more pts in the G-CSF group received myeloablative-conditioning (MAC) regimen (78% vs. 55%, p = 0.008). Other pt characteristics were not significantly different. Length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the G-CSF group (24 vs. 27 days P = 0.002). Pts who received G-CSF had earlier neutrophil engraftment (median, days 11 vs. 14 p = < 0.001). The median day of platelet engraftment was 15 days in both groups. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in re-admissions in the first 100 days, and the incidence of acute or chronic GVHD. In multivariate analysis use of G-CSF did not significantly impact non- relapse mortality, relapse free survival and overall survival. However, relapse rate was significantly lower in G-CSF group in multivariable analysis (hazards ratio = 0.44, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Use of G-CSF post allogeneic PBSCT is associated with earlier neutrophil engraftment, shorter hospital stay and a suggestion of a reduced relapse rate after PBSCT. Our experience suggests that use of G-CSF (on average for approximately 5 days) in this setting is cost effective as it reduces hospitalization duration without adversely impacting post-transplant outcomes.

e19524 Background: Lenalidomide (len) is approved for treatment in Multiple Myeloma (MM) Use of len has been associated with an increase in venous thrombotic events (VTE) and aspirin prophylaxis is recommended for pts who are on active treatment with len. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is used during the treatmentof MM after initial induction therapy. The use of intravenous catheters and hospitalization increase the risk of VTE in peri-transplant period. We evaluated the incidence of VTE in peri-transplant period to determine if len use increased the risk of VTE. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of pts with MM who underwent first ASCT at our institution between 1/2011-1/2015.Data was collected on pt. demographics, len use, VTE prophylaxis, VTE incidence and VTE treatment. Chemical anticoagulation during the peri-transplant period was based on physician preference and chemical anticoagulation was stopped once platelet counts dropped below 50,000/ uL. All pts were encouraged to ambulate daily for mechanical prophylaxis. Associations with incidence of VTE were conducted by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 303 pts met the study criteria. 204 pts received Len as part of induction treatment while 99 did not. There was no significant difference in demographics of the 2 groups. 87% pts in the Len group and 81% in the non-Len group did not receive any chemical prophylaxis, respectively during hospitalization. 15 pts developed DVT within 100 days of transplant: 10 in len group and 5 in non-len group (p > 0.99). 14 of the 15 were catheter associated. Median time to DVT was 10.5 days post-transplant. Caucasians had a higher risk of DVT; adjusted OR 0.315 (95%CI 0.03-0.99; p = 0.046). Incidence of VTE was not affected by prophylaxis, or response to induction. Conclusions: Despite the fact that during the peri-transplant period most of the patients were not on prophylactic chemical anticoagulation due to chemotherapy associated thrombocytopenia len use during the induction treatment did not increase the risk of peri-transplant VTE.

A single cycle of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support (HDC) in women with responsive metastatic breast cancer (BC) consistently achieves over 50% complete and near complete response (CR/nCR). This significant cytoreduction results in a median event-free survival (EFS) of 8 months, and approximately 20% 3-year and 16% 5-year EFS in selected patients. To improve long-term outcomes, new strategies to treat minimal residual tumor burden are needed. Increased total dose delivered can be achieved with two cycles of HDC. Critical design issues include shortening induction chemotherapy to avoid development of drug resistance and the use of different agents for each HDC cycle. We have determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for paclitaxel combined with high-dose melphalan in the context of a double transplant and explored the impact of a short induction phase. Between June 1994 and August 1996, we enrolled 32 women with metastatic BC on to this phase I double transplant trial. Induction consisted of doxorubicin 30 mg/m2/day days 1-3 given for 2 cycles every 14 days with G-CSF 5 microg/kg s.c. days 4-12. Stem cell collection was performed by leukapheresis in each cycle when the WBC recovered to above 1000/microl. Patients with stable disease or better response to induction were eligible to proceed with HDC. HDC regimen I (TxM) included paclitaxel with dose escalation from 0 to 300 mg/m2 given on day 1 and melphalan 180 mg/m2 in two divided doses given on day 3. HDC regimen II was CTCb (cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2, thiotepa 500 mg/m2, and carboplatin 800 mg/m2 total doses) delivered by 96-h continuous infusion. At the first dose level of 150 mg/m2 paclitaxel by 3 h infusion, four of five patients developed dose-limiting toxicity consisting of diffuse skin erythema and capillary leak syndrome. Only two of these five completed the second transplant. Subsequently, paclitaxel was delivered by 24-h continuous infusion together with 96 h of dexamethasone and histamine receptor blockade. This particular toxicity was not observed again. No toxic deaths occurred and dose-limiting toxicity was not encountered. Three patients were removed from study prior to transplant: one for insurance refusal and two for disease progression. All others completed both cycles of transplant. Complete and near complete response (CR/nCR) after completion of therapy was achieved in 23 (72%) of 32 patients. The median EFS is 26 months. The median overall survival has not yet been reached. At a median follow-up of 58 months, EFS and overall survival are 41% and 53%, respectively. This double transplant approach is feasible, safe, and tolerable. Treatment duration is only 14 weeks and eliminates lengthy induction chemotherapy. The observed event-free and overall survivals are promising and are better than expected following a single transplant. Whilst selection biases may in part contribute to this effect, a much larger phase II double transplant trial is warranted in preparation for a potential randomized comparison of standard therapy vs single vs double transplant.

4-Hydroperoxycyclophosphamide is an oxazaphosphorine which is readily converted without enzymatic involvement to 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide-a key intermediate in the antitumor activity of this class of drugs. The efficacy of 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide as a systemically administered antitumor drug was examined in mice bearing EMT-6 mammary carcinoma and in rats bearing 13762 mammary carcinoma in comparison with other oxazaphosphorines. 4-Hydroperoxycyclophosphamide was a more potent tumor cell killing agent than cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide in animals bearing the EMT-6 tumor. There were no significant differences in the toxicity to bone marrow amongst the three oxazaphosphorines. 4-Hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (90 mg/kg) on days 7, 9 and 11 produced 11.5 days of tumor growth delay compared with 10.4 days and 7.1 days for cyclophosphamide (150 mg/kg) and ifosfamide (150 mg/kg) administered on the same schedule, respectively. 4-Hydroperoxycyclophosphamide was tolerated at 90 mg/kg daily for 5 days and at 75 mg/kg twice daily for 4 days producing tumor growth delays of 14.4 days and 16.6 days, respectively. In rats bearing 13762 tumors, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (90 mg/kg) on days 8, 10 and 12 produced a tumor growth delay of 14.5 days compared with 8.9 days for cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg) administered on the same schedule. Treatment of 13762 tumor-bearing rats with phenobarbital, pentobarbital or etanidazole increased the tumor growth delay produced by cyclophosphamide while treatment with cimetidine decreased the tumor growth delay produced by cyclophosphamide but not significantly. Administration of 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (90 mg/kg) produced blood concentrations of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide three-fold higher than those produced by administration of cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg) at 15 min after drug injection. Treatment with phenobarbital or pentobarbital increased 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide blood concentration while pretreatment with cimetidine decreased 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide blood concentration from cyclophosphamide. 4-Hydroperoxycyclophosphamide is an effective antitumor agent worthy of further investigation.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are commonly collected and used to reconstitute hematopoiesis after high-dose chemotherapy. However, strategies for optimal collection and assessment of leukapheresis components are not standardized. STUDY DESIGN and METHODS: Hematopoietic progenitor cell assays were performed on 369 leukapheresis components collected from 95 patients who had received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy and/or granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Precollection patient hematologic values, leukapheresis collection values, component hematopoietic progenitor cell assays, and patient outcome measures were summarized. The kinetics of mononuclear cell (MNC) and PBPC mobilization were assessed among four patient groups. RESULTS: Patient group was a significant predictor of the peripheral blood MNC count on the day of collection (p

PURPOSE With a median observation time of 50 months from transplant, 13 (22%) of 62 women with metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI)/Beth Israel Hospital (BIH) remain progression-free. This study determined factors prognostic for prolonged progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS From June 1988 to January 1992, women who responded to standard chemotherapy received high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with autotransplantation. Data encompassing initial breast cancer diagnosis, metastatic presentation, and response to induction treatment were examined for correlations with improved PFS. RESULTS The 5-year PFS rate for the entire group is estimated to be 21% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 32%). For those patients who attained a complete response (CR) to induction therapy, the 5-year PFS rate is estimated to be 31% (95% CI, 0% to 63%). In univariate analyses, a single metastatic site, CR to induction therapy, prolonged interval from primary diagnosis to first metastases, estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors, and older age (> or = 40 years) were associated with prolonged PFS. In multivariate analyses, single metastatic site (P = .002) and attainment of a CR to induction chemotherapy (P = .04) were the most significant predictors for PFS, with a strong trend observed for an interval from primary diagnosis to onset of metastatic disease of 24+ months (P = .066). CONCLUSION We and others have shown that 10% to 25% of women with metastatic breast cancer are progression-free after high-dose chemotherapy with autotransplantation. Those with chemosensitive disease, minimal tumor bulk, and a prolonged disease-free interval appear to benefit most. Emphasis should continue to focus on the development of more effective cytotoxic regimens and biologic approaches to increase the percentage of patients who may benefit from this approach.

Background: Bortezomib has become an integral part of front-line therapy of multiple myeloma in a large majority of patients. There are preliminary reports which show that addition of bortezomib can augment the peripheral blood CD34 count during stem cell mobilization. In this single center prospective trial we added bortezomib to G-CSF to evaluate the effects of bortezomib on peripheral CD34 counts and collection. Methods: Patients aged 18-70 years with diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) or non-hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) who were eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and had received no more than three prior chemotherapeutic regimens were eligible for the study. Patients were enrolled in two groups. Group A (N=3) received G-CSF 16mcg/kg for 5 days and proceeded to stem cell collection on D5 and then received bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on D5 after stem cell collection and G-CSF 16mcg/kg on D6, 7, 8 and repeat stem cell collection on D6, 7, 8 till the goal was achieved. Group B (N=17) received G-CSF 16mg/kg on D1-5 and received bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on D4 and proceeded to stem cell collection on D5. If the patient was not able to collect the predefined goal CD34, G-CSF was continued on D 6, 7, 8 and a second dose of bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 was given on D7. Mobilization procedure was stopped once the predefined goal CD34 collection (4 x 106/kg for MM and 2 x 106/kg for NHL) had been collected. Primary objectives of the study was to determine if addition of bortezomib to G-CSF will result in an increase in PBSCs by > 2-fold and to achieve median neutrophil engraftment 12 days post ASCT. Secondary objectiveswere to evaluate the collected product for co-mobilization of lymphoma or myeloma cells and to determine if the use of bortezomib increases the mobilization of immune-stimulatory Dendritic cell (DC) -1 subsets. Results: A total of 23 patients were enrolled and 20 were evaluable for the results. Only one patient with NHL was enrolled and rest had MM. Median age of pts was 57 years, M/F 8/12, median number of previous chemotherapy regimens was 1 (range 1-3). The median peripheral blood CD34 count pre and post bortezomib in all patients were 28.8 x 106/kg and 37 x 106/kg respectively. All three patients in group A had drop in peripheral blood CD34 counts on D6 post bortezomib as they had undergone stem cell collection on day 5. In part B (N=17), 15 patients had increase in peripheral blood CD 34+ve cell counts with 4 patients achieved doubling while 11 pts had less than doubling of peripheral blood CD34 count after receiving bortezomib. Two patients had minimal drop in the peripheral blood CD34 counts post bortezomib. Median number of CD34 cells collected in15 patients (part B) were 5.06 x 106 CD34 cells/kg (range 4-15.1). 18 patients proceeded to ASCT and median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC ≥500/cumm) post transplant was 12 days (range 11-16) and platelet engraftment (Plt count ≥ 20,000/cumm) was 18 days (range 15-27). There was no significant change in DC1/DC2 ratio in both groups following treatment with bortezomib and G-CSF (Figure 1). In group A all three patients collected goal CD34 count on day 5 and 2/3 patients collected >4 x106 CD34 cells/kg on D6 post bortezomib and1/3 patients collected 2.6 x 106 on D6 post bortezomib. In group B (n=17), 2 patients were unable to collect because of low CD34 counts on D4 and D5, 11 pts collected the goal in one day (D 5) and 4 pts required two days of apheresis (D 5 and 6). None of the patients received D7 bortezomib. Conclusion: Use of bortezomib during autologous stem cell collection was safe and well tolerated. Majority of patients had increase in peripheral blood CD34 counts post bortezomib administration on D4. Future trials should explore bortezomib as an alternate strategy to chemo-mobilization in combination with growth factors. Figure 1. DC1/DC2 ratio in group A and group B at various time points. Figure 1. DC1/DC2 ratio in group A and group B at various time points. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Off Label Use: Bortezomib for stem cell mobilization. Lum:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Equity Ownership; Transtarget.Inc: Equity Ownership. Deol:Bristol meyer squibb: Research Funding. Abidi:celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Research Funding.

PURPOSE Twenty-seven percent of responding metastatic breast cancer patients remain progression-free a median 29 months following one intensification course of cyclophosphamide (6,000 mg/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2), and carboplatin (800 mg/m2) (CTCb) with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). European investigators report high complete response (CR) rates with melphalan for breast cancer. This trial studied the feasibility of two tandem high-dose intensification therapies in an attempt to optimize disease response and duration. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women with at least partial responses (PRs) to induction therapy received melphalan (140 to 180 mg/m2), followed 24 hours later by chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) and subsequent G-CSF until WBC recovery. The women were monitored as outpatients. After recovery, patients were hospitalized for CTCb with marrow, PBPC, and G-CSF support. RESULTS Twenty women were assessable. Fourteen (70%) required admission for fever (10% infection) or mucositis (35%) after melphalan (median stay, 5 days). Median days of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 500/microL and platelet count less than 20,000/microL were 6 and 5.5, respectively. Patients received CTCb 25 days after starting melphalan and had a hospital stay of 25 days. After CTCb, median days of ANC less than 500/microL and platelet count less than 20,000/microL were 11.5 and 24, respectively. Grade 3 toxicities included venoocclusive disease (VOD) (10%), mucositis (45%), and infection (20%). Toxicities were reversible without mortality. CONCLUSION With mobilized PBPCs and growth factors, double dose-intensive chemotherapy is feasible with acceptable toxicity. When compared with trials using marrow alone, these supportive adjuncts decrease sepsis and organ toxicity. The concepts of dose and dose-intensity may now be more effectively and safely studied in chemosensitive tumors, including breast cancer.

This is a phase II trial evaluating efficacy and safety of Aprepitant (AP) in combination with 5-HT3 antagonist and adjusted dose dexamethasone in patients receiving high-dose cyclophosphamide (CY) and filgrastim for stem cell mobilization. We used Simon’s optimal two-stage design constrained to fewer than 40 patients with 10% type I error and 85% statistical power. The first stage of the study required accrual of 18 response-evaluable patients. The primary endpoint was the control of vomiting without the use of any rescue anti-emetics at 24 hours after the administration of high dose CY (4gm/m2). If emesis was controlled in ≥ 9 patients, an additional cohort of 17 patients would be enrolled. The null hypothesis would be rejected if there were ≥ 20 responses among 35 patients. Forty patients were enrolled, five of whom were not evaluable for response. Eighteen evaluable patients were enrolled in the first stage. Acute emesis was controlled in 10 patients; therefore, enrollment proceeded to stage 2. An additional 17 patients were enrolled; 20/35 response-evaluable patients (57%) did not develop acute vomiting or require rescue anti-emetics, thus achieving the goal of the study. A total of 22/35 response-evaluable patients (63%) met the secondary endpoint of delayed emesis control (days 2–5). Thirty three out of 35 patients underwent successful stem cell mobilization. No ≥ grade 3 AP-related adverse events were noted. The AP regimen can effectively control acute and delayed emesis in the majority patients receiving high-dose CY.

High dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow support (ABMT) can achieve prolonged relapse-free survival in relapsed lymphomas, leukemias, and certain solid tumors. The principal morbidity and mortality relate to the infectious complications that occur during the 3-4 week aplasia until the marrow autograft recovers. Progenitor cells can be mobilized into the peripheral blood compartment by hematopoietic growth factors, used alone or after chemotherapy. We describe four trials using cytokine-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). In the first trial, PBPC collected after GM-CSF administration were used to augment marrow. Reconstitution of trilineage marrow function occurred promptly, resulting in short hospital stays and fewer platelet transfusions. In a second study, GM-CSF/chemotherapy-mobilized PBPC were used as the sole hematopoietic support during high dose chemotherapy. Granulocyte and platelet reconstitution was rapid. Time to hematopoietic recovery, transfusion requirements, and duration of hospital stay were all significantly improved for the patients receiving PBPC compared with similar patients receiving marrow alone. While most patients experienced prompt hematopoietic recovery they showed sluggish platelet engraftment. The next two trials built on the observation that a few PBPC alone could support both granulocyte and platelet recovery and were designed to test the feasibility of sequential high-dose therapies. In one trial, PBPC given with and without marrow made it possible to deliver two sequential cycles of high-dose therapy. The second trial utilized PBPC plus cytokines to deliver four cycles of dose-intensive chemotherapy at doses that could not be given with cytokine support alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The overall median survival of women with advanced or high-risk primary breast cancer has not changed with conventional chemotherapy. Regimens employing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (ABMT) have been developed with the hope of optimizing tumor response and increasing survival. Early phase I studies in women with advanced refractory disease achieved high response rates of short duration. Second generation studies combined an induction phase followed by one high-dose intensification at time of maximum tumor response. The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Beth Israel Hospitals have developed the high-dose intensification regimen of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) for use in women with metastatic and high-risk stage IIIB/inflammatory breast cancer. To date, approximately 19% of women with metastatic disease remain progression free using this approach, with median length of follow-up approaching 40 months. Although the median duration of follow-up for the stage IIIB women is much shorter (approximately 12 months), greater than 90% of these women are thus far disease free. With the advent of hematologic support, such as blood stem cells and colony-stimulating factors, the morbidity, mortality, and costs associated with this treatment have been substantially reduced, allowing for two or more cycles of high-dose intensification to be employed, to exploit the potential of dose-intensity to optimize response.

High-dose therapy with autologous marrow support results in durable complete remissions in selected patients with relapsed lymphoma and leukemia who cannot be cured with conventional dose therapy. However, substantial morbidity and mortality result from the 3- to 6-week period of marrow aplasia until the reinfused marrow recovers adequate hematopoietic function. Hematopoietic growth factors, particularly used after chemotherapy, can increase the number of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) present in systemic circulation. The reinfusion of PBPCs with marrow has recently been reported to reduce the time to recovery of adequate marrow function. This study was designed to determine whether granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-mobilized PBPCs alone (without marrow) would result in rapid and reliable hematopoietic reconstitution. Sixteen patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with four cycles of doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and methotrexate (AFM induction). Patients responding after the first two cycles were administered GM-CSF after the third and fourth cycles to recruit PBPCs for collection by two leukapheresis per cycle. These PBPCs were reinfused as the sole source of hematopoietic support after high doses of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin. No marrow or hematopoietic cytokines were used after progenitor cell reinfusion. Granulocytes greater than or equal to 500/microL was observed on a median of day 14 (range, 8 to 57). Transfusion independence of platelets greater than or equal to 20,000/microL occurred on a median day of 12 (range, 8 to 134). However, three patients required the use of a reserve marrow for slow platelet engraftment. In retrospect, these patients were characterized by poor baseline bone marrow cellularity and poor platelet recovery after AFM induction therapy. When compared with 29 historical control patients who had received the same high-dose intensification chemotherapy using autologous marrow support, time to engraftment, antibiotic days, transfusion requirements, and lengths of hospital stay were all significantly improved for the patients receiving PBPCs. Thus, autologous PBPCs can be efficiently collected during mobilization by chemotherapy and GM-CSF and are an attractive alternative to marrow for hematopoietic support after high-dose therapy. The enhanced speed of recovery may reduce the morbidity, mortality, and cost of high-dose treatment. Furthermore, PBPC support may enhance the effectiveness of high-dose therapy by facilitating multiple courses of therapy.

PURPOSE The study was designed to determine the duration of complete response (CR) for patients with unresectable or metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) while responding to conventional-dose therapy. METHODS Eligibility criteria included histologically documented metastatic or unresectable breast cancer, at least a partial response (PR) to conventional-dose therapy, no prior pelvic radiotherapy, cumulative doxorubicin of less than 500 mg/m3, and physiologic age between 18 and 55 years. Patients with inadequate renal, hepatic, pulmonary, and/or cardiac function or tumor involvement of marrow or CNS were excluded. Cyclophosphamide 6,000 mg/m2, thiotepa 500 mg/m2, and carboplatin 800 mg/m2 were given by continuous infusion over 4 days. After recovery, sites of prior bulk disease were to be radiated or resected if feasible. RESULTS Of 29 registered patients, one died of toxicity (3%; hemorrhage). CRs and PRs continued a median of 16 and 5 months after transplant, respectively (26 and 9 months from initiation of chemotherapy for metastatic disease). Of 10 patients transplanted in CR, four have not progressed at 17 to 31 months after transplantation (25 to 43 months after beginning standard-dose therapy). One of four patients with uptake on bone scan as their only sites of residual disease before transplant and one of three who converted from PR to CR with transplant have not progressed at 27 and 29 months, respectively, after transplant. CONCLUSIONS CTCb is an intensification regimen with a low mortality that delivers a significantly increased dose of agents with known activity at conventional doses in breast cancer. Although the duration of PR is short as expected, CRs appear to be durable.

In an effort to improve the cytotoxicity of clinically used anticancer alkylating agents, the topoisomerase II inhibitory drugs U73-975 or mitoxantrone were added to cell cultures exposed to CDDP, carboplatin, BCNU, melphalan or thiotepa. In the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line and in the MCF-7/CP (CDDP resistant) subline, U73-975 and mitoxantrone were both potent cytotoxic agents (IC50 0.002 microM and 0.006 microM for U73-975, respectively and 0.8 microM and 0.1 microM for mitoxantrone, respectively). As evaluated by isobologram analysis, the addition of either U73-975 or mitoxantrone to 1 h exposure to CDDP resulted in greater-than-additive killing in the MCF-7 parent cells. While U73-975 was also greater-than-additive in cytotoxicity with CDDP in the MCF-7/CP line, mitoxantrone and CDDP were only additive in cytotoxicity in these cells. In the case of carboplatin, the addition of U73-975 or mitoxantrone to treatment with the drug resulted in greater-than-additive cell killing in the MCF-7 parental cell line but in the MCF-7/CP cell line these combinations were only additive in cell killing. Addition of U73-975 to treatment with BCNU resulted in only additive cytotoxicity in both cell lines; however, the combination of mitoxantrone with BCNU resulted in greater-than-additive cell killing in both the parental and CDDP resistant cell lines. When either U73-975 or mitoxantrone was added to treatment with melphalan greater-than-additive cytotoxicity resulted in both cell lines except at low melphalan concentrations in the MCF-7/CP cell line. Finally, the addition of either modulator to treatment with thiotepa in the MCF-7 cell line produced variable interactions depending on thiotepa concentration, but in the MCF-7/CP cell line either modulator in combination with thiotepa caused greater-than-additive cell killing. These results indicate that the addition of topoisomerase II inhibitory drugs may substantially increase the cytotoxicity of some alkylating agents. In vivo experiments are necessary, however, to ascertain whether a therapeutic gain is achievable.