Search

Introduction We retrospectively examined progression-free survival (PFS) and response by ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) status in patients with advanced ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC)-positive NSCLC in the ALEX study. Methods A total of 303 treatment-naive patients were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib 600 mg or crizotinib 250 mg. ALK status was assessed centrally using Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx IHC and Vysis ALK Break Apart FISH Probe Kit. Primary end point is investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary end points of interest are objective response rate and duration. Results Investigator-assessed PFS was significantly prolonged with alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK IHC-positive and FISH-positive tumors (n = 203, 67%) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25–0.56; p Conclusions Outcomes of patients with ALK IHC-positive and FISH-positive and ALK IHC-positive and FISH-uninformative NSCLC were similar to those of the overall ALEX population. These results suggest that Ventana ALK IHC is a standard testing method for selecting patients for treatment with alectinib.

Background The ALEX study demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the primary data cut-off (9 February 2017). We report mature PFS (cut-off: 30 November 2018) and overall survival (OS) data up to 5 years (cut-off: 29 November 2019). Patients and methods Patients with stage III/IV ALK-positive NSCLC were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib 600 mg (n = 152) or crizotinib 250 mg (n = 151) until disease progression, toxicity, withdrawal or death. Primary end point: investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary end points included objective response rate, OS and safety. Results Mature PFS data showed significantly prolonged investigator-assessed PFS with alectinib [hazard ratio (HR) 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32–0.58; median PFS 34.8 versus 10.9 months crizotinib]. Median duration of OS follow-up: 48.2 months alectinib, 23.3 months crizotinib. OS data remain immature (37% of events). Median OS was not reached with alectinib versus 57.4 months with crizotinib (stratified HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46–0.98). The 5-year OS rate was 62.5% (95% CI 54.3–70.8) with alectinib and 45.5% (95% CI 33.6–57.4) with crizotinib, with 34.9% and 8.6% of patients still on study treatment, respectively. The OS benefit of alectinib was seen in patients with central nervous system metastases at baseline [HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.34–1.00)] and those without [HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.45–1.26)]. Median treatment duration was longer with alectinib (28.1 versus 10.8 months), and no new safety signals were observed. Conclusions Mature PFS data from ALEX confirmed significant improvement in PFS for alectinib over crizotinib in ALK-positive NSCLC. OS data remain immature, with a higher 5-year OS rate with alectinib versus crizotinib. This is the first global randomized study to show clinically meaningful improvement in OS for a next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor versus crizotinib in treatment-naive ALK-positive NSCLC. Clinical trials number NCT02075840.

Introduction The effectiveness of ALK receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK) inhibitors can be limited by the development of ALK resistance mutations. This exploratory analysis assessed the efficacy of alectinib in patients with NSCLC and ALK point mutations using pooled data from two single-arm phase II studies. Methods Studies NP28673 and NP28761 enrolled adults with locally advanced/metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed on crizotinib. ALK mutation analysis was conducted on cell-free DNA from 187 patients post-crizotinib/pre-alectinib, and from 49 of these patients who subsequently progressed on alectinib. Results Baseline characteristics were generally balanced across patient subgroups. At baseline, 34 distinct ALK mutations were identified in 48 of 187 patients (25.7%). Median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was longer in patients without ALK single-nucleotide variants (n = 138) versus those with (n = 48): 10.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1–14.3) versus 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.5–10.9), respectively. Sixteen of 32 patients (50%) with ALK resistance mutations to crizotinib achieved an investigator-assessed response to alectinib (all partial responses); most of these ALK mutations were known to be sensitive to alectinib. Analysis of plasma samples obtained post-progression on alectinib revealed that 26 of 49 (53%) samples harbored 16 distinct ALK mutations, with known alectinib-resistance mutations, I1171 T/N/S, G1202R, and V1180L, observed in 15 of 49 (31%) tumors. Conclusions Alectinib appears clinically active against ALK rearrangements and mutations, as well as several ALK variants that can cause resistance to crizotinib. The use of cell-free DNA in plasma samples may be an alternative noninvasive method for monitoring resistance mutations during therapy.

TPS9159 Background: RET gene fusions have been identified as oncogenic drivers in multiple tumor types, including 1–2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pralsetinib is a potent, selective RET inhibitor, approved in the US and EU for the treatment of metastatic RET fusion–positive NSCLC based on the phase 1/2 ARROW study (NCT03037385). In the ARROW study (data cutoff: Nov 6, 2020), patients who initiated 400 mg once daily (QD) of pralsetinib after platinum-based chemotherapy achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 62%, per independent central review. In the treatment-naïve group, the ORR was 79%. Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1–2 across the entire safety population treated at 400 mg QD (n=471). AcceleRET Lung, an international, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study (NCT04222972), will evaluate the efficacy and safety of pralsetinib versus standard of care (SOC) for first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic RET fusion–positive NSCLC. Abstracts for this study were previously submitted to the European Lung Cancer Congress 2020, the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020 annual meeting, and 2020 World Conference on Lung Cancer. Methods: Approximately 226 patients with metastatic RET fusion–positive NSCLC will be randomized 1:1 to oral pralsetinib (400 mg QD) or SOC (non-squamous histology: platinum/pemetrexed ± pembrolizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed ± pembrolizumab [at investigator’s discretion]; squamous histology: platinum/gemcitabine or platinum + pembrolizumab + paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel followed by maintenance pembrolizumab). Stratification factors include intended use of pembrolizumab, history of brain metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status. Key eligibility criteria include no prior systemic treatment for advanced/metastatic NSCLC; RET fusion–positive tumor by local or central assessment; no additional actionable oncogenic drivers; no prior selective RET inhibitor; measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Patients with central nervous system metastases were permitted if asymptomatic and on a stable dose of corticosteroids. Cross-over to receive pralsetinib upon disease progression will be permitted for patients randomized to SOC. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (blinded independent central review; RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints include ORR, overall survival, duration of response, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, time to intracranial progression, intracranial ORR, safety/tolerability and quality of life evaluations. Identification of potential biomarkers of antineoplastic activity and resistance was an exploratory endpoint. Recruitment has begun with sites (active or planned) in North America, Central America, Europe and Asia. Clinical trial information: NCT04222972.

Alectinib, a highly selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has shown systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated alectinib as compared with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, including those with asymptomatic CNS disease. In a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 303 patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC to receive either alectinib (600 mg twice daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points were independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival, time to CNS progression, objective response rate, and overall survival. During a median follow-up of 17.6 months (crizotinib) and 18.6 months (alectinib), an event of disease progression or death occurred in 62 of 152 patients (41%) in the alectinib group and 102 of 151 patients (68%) in the crizotinib group. The rate of investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly higher with alectinib than with crizotinib (12-month event-free survival rate, 68.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 61.0 to 75.9] with alectinib vs. 48.7% [95% CI, 40.4 to 56.9] with crizotinib; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.65]; P

Purpose Women receiving trastuzumab with chemotherapy are at risk for trastuzumab-related cardiac dysfunction (TRCD). We explored the prognostic value of cardiac markers (troponins I and T, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) to predict baseline susceptibility to develop TRCD. We examined whether development of cardiac end points or significant left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) drop was associated with markers’ increases. Patients and Methods Cardiac marker assessments were coupled with LVEF measurements at different time points for 533 patients from the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) study who agreed to participate in this study. Patients with missing marker assessments were excluded, resulting in 452 evaluable patients. A primary cardiac end point was defined as symptomatic congestive heart failure of New York Heart Association class III or IV, confirmed by a cardiologist, and a significant LVEF drop, or death of definite or probable cardiac causes. A secondary cardiac end point was defined as a confirmed significant asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic LVEF drop. Results Elevated baseline troponin I (> 40 ng/L) and T (> 14 ng/L), occurring in 56 of 412 (13.6%) and 101 of 407 (24.8%) patients, respectively, were associated with an increased significant LVEF drop risk (univariate analysis: hazard ratio, 4.52; P < .001 and hazard ratio, 3.57; P < .001, respectively). Few patients had their first elevated troponin value recorded during the study (six patients for troponin I and 25 patients for troponin T). Two patients developed a primary and 31 patients a secondary cardiac end point (recovery rate of 74%, 23 of 31). For NT-proBNP, higher increases from baseline were seen in patients with significant LVEF drop. Conclusion Elevated troponin I or T before trastuzumab is associated with increased risk for TRCD. A similar conclusion for NT-proBNP could not be drawn because of the lack of a well-established elevation threshold; however, higher increases from baseline were seen in patients with TRCD compared with patients without.

TPS3155 Background: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK) fusions are found in 3–8% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and ̃0.2% of other tumor types. Alectinib is a selective, CNS-active ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved as first-line treatment for adults with advanced ALK fusion-positive ( ALK-fp) NSCLC based on the phase 3 ALEX trial (NCT02075840; PMID 28586279). Preliminary evidence supports investigation of alectinib in a tumor-agnostic setting. ALK inhibitors have shown efficacy in ALK-fp tumor types other than NSCLC (PMIDs 29685646; 28977547; 30591488), with alectinib showing efficacy irrespective of ALK fusion partner and against ALK-activating mutations (PMIDs 29642598; 29559559). Methods: Alpha-T is a phase 2 open-label, single-arm trial (NCT04644315) with an innovative home-based remote design, currently enrolling adults with histologically confirmed, locally advanced/metastatic solid tumors (except lung cancer and cancers of unknown primary) harboring ALK fusions or selected mutations ( ALK-mut; R1275Q, F1245C, F1174X). The decentralized design permits enrollment regardless of location, allows most assessments to be home-based and maintains the relationship between patients (pts) and their treating oncologist. Key inclusion criteria: no alternative or unsuitable to receive standard therapy; ECOG PS 0–2; adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic functions; no prior ALK inhibitor; measurable solid tumor (RECIST 1.1) or primary brain tumor (RANO); asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases permitted. Pts are identified via the Foundation Medicine Inc. (FMI) Precision Enrollment service. For any solid tumor identified as ALK+ (fusion/selected mutation) by next-generation sequencing in tissue/blood (F1 CDx/F1L CDx, FMI), the ordering oncologist is given trial details and can liaise with a Science 37 investigator. Pts receive 600mg oral alectinib twice a day with food until radiological PD, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or death. Home-based assessments (eg, physical examination, blood sampling, questionnaire completion) are conducted in-person by a mobile nurse at baseline and every 4 weeks, with remote support from the Science 37 investigator via their telemedicine platform. Tumor assessments at screening and every 8 weeks are performed at a local radiology facility. Primary endpoint: confirmed ORR by investigator in pts with ALK-fp tumors (RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints: ORR by independent review facility (IRF); DoR and PFS; intracranial ORR and DoR (IRF); OS and safety. Descriptive analyses are planned for pts with ALK-mut tumors and primary brain tumors. Pharmacokinetics and biomarkers will be evaluated. Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed via the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Target enrollment is 50 pts with ALK-fp tumors evaluable by RECIST. As of 9 Feb 2021, 1 pt is in screening. Clinical trial information: NCT04644315.

At the prior data cutoff (February 9, 2017) the ALEX trial showed superior investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) for alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive, advanced NSCLC (hazard ratio = 0.47, 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.65, p0.001). The median PFS in the alectinib arm was not reached versus 11.1 months with crizotinib. Retrospective analyses suggest that the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 gene-ALK variant (EML4-ALK) may influence ALK-inhibitor treatment benefit. We present updated analyses, including exploratory subgroup analysis by EML4-ALK variant, after an additional 10 months' follow-up (cutoff December 1, 2017).Patients were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib, 600 mg, or crizotinib, 250 mg, until disease progression, toxicity, death, or withdrawal. PFS was determined by the investigators. Baseline plasma and tissue biomarker samples were analyzed by using hybrid-capture, next-generation sequencing to determine EML4-ALK variant.Baseline characteristics were balanced. Investigator-assessed PFS was prolonged with alectinib (stratified hazard ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.58). The median PFS times were 34.8 months with alectinib and 10.9 months with crizotinib. EML4-ALK fusions were detectable in 129 patient plasma samples and 124 tissue samples; variants 1, 2, and 3/ab did not affect PFS, objective response rate, or duration of response. Investigator-assessed PFS was longer for alectinib than for crizotinib across EML4-ALK variants 1, 2, and 3a/b in plasma and tissue. Despite longer treatment duration (27.0 months in the case of alectinib versus 10.8 months in the case of crizotinib), the safety of alectinib compared favorably with that of crizotinib.Alectinib continues to demonstrate superior investigator-assessed PFS versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive NSCLC, irrespective of EML4-ALK variant.

Newly diagnosed invasive breast cancers should be evaluated for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridisation (ISH) to determine eligibility for trastuzumab or other HER2-targeted therapies. Previous reports of high discordance rates between IHC and ISH have raised concerns over the accuracy of HER2 testing, especially when IHC is conducted locally. This study aimed to determine the rate of false-negative IHC results at three pathology centres (one central, two local) in Greece by central retesting of 240 prospectively collected invasive breast cancers scored as IHC 0/1+ at initial testing. All samples were from female patients (median age 58.0 years). Initial IHC tests utilised either the CB11 (159/239; 66.5%) or 4B5 (80/239; 33.5%) antibodies and were scored as 0 in 105/240 cases (43.8%) and 1+ in 135/240 cases (56.3%). All samples were centrally retested by automated silver in situ hybridisation (SISH). Of 237 samples with SISH staining suitable for assessment, 223 (94.1%; 95% confidence interval 90.3–96.5%) were classed as SISH-negative (HER2:chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) HER2:CEP17 >2.2), providing a false-negative rate of 3.4%. A further four samples (1.7%) exhibited equivocal amplification status (HER2:CEP17 1.8–2.2) and two (0.8%) showed polysomy of chromosome 17. The proportion of SISH-negative results did not significantly differ between the IHC 0 and 1+ subgroups (95.2% vs. 93.2%; p=0.505). In conclusion, the low observed rate of false-negative IHC results in this study supports the use of IHC for initial HER2 status assessment in local or central laboratories in Greece.

9053 Background: Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) released predominantly by tumors into the blood correlates with tumor load, but correlation with outcomes after ALK inhibitor treatment is poorly understood. Here, we examine the prognostic potential of cfDNA in the phase III ALEX trial of alectinib versus crizotinib in previously untreated patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Methods: Data cutoff was December 1, 2017. Median cfDNA was determined from 276 baseline samples; patients were stratified into ‘≤median’ and ‘ > median’ biomarker-evaluable populations (BEP). Results: Median cfDNA was 11.5ng/mL. Baseline characteristics were mostly balanced between the crizotinib (≤median, n = 72; > median, n = 67) and alectinib (≤median, n = 66; > median n = 71) BEPs. However, the alectinib > median BEP had more active smokers (7.0% vs crizotinib 1.5%), more measurable/non-measurable CNS lesions (47.9% vs 41.8%) and more patients with TP53 short-variant (SV) (44.8% vs 32.8%); the alectinib ≤median BEP had more active smokers (7.6% vs crizotinib 2.8%). Alectinib exposure was not substantially different between relevant BEPs. Higher cfDNA amount was associated with measurable/non-measurable CNS lesions and TP53 SV. Tumor burden positively correlated with normalized cfDNA amount (Pearson correlation 0.204; p < 0.001). Median PFS by investigator in the ≤median BEP was 34.9 months alectinib vs 14.8 crizotinib (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22–0.61, p < 0.0001); in the > median BEP it was 14.8 months alectinib vs 8.6 crizotinib (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.28–0.64, p < 0.0001). Response rates in the ≤median BEP were 82.3% alectinib vs 70.4% crizotinib; in the > median BEP, 70.2% alectinib vs 55.4% crizotinib. Median duration of response in the ≤median BEP was not reached for alectinib vs 21.0 months for crizotinib; in the > median BEP, 33.1 months alectinib vs 7.3 crizotinib. Conclusions: Tumor burden positively correlated with cfDNA amount; patients with ≤median cfDNA at baseline had better prognosis than those with > median cfDNA. Alectinib consistently improved PFS, DOR and ORR versus crizotinib across BEPs, reducing the risk of tumor progression by > 50% compared with crizotinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02075840.

Introduction: Increase in targeted therapies has resulted in the need for a single assay capable of detecting diverse biomarkers indicated for these agents. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) provides such a solution, but due to the complexity and number of assays available today, standardization of validation has become critically important. We present FoundationOne CDx, the first NGS-based comprehensive companion diagnostics (CDx) platform developed and performed in compliance with FDA 21 CFR part 820. The assay interrogates 324 genes, and has CDx indications in five tumor types associated with 17 targeted therapies (Table 1). The versatile assay design will facilitate streamlined development of future CDx indications. Methods: DNA extracted from FFPE tumor tissue underwent whole-genome shotgun library construction and hybridization-based capture, followed by sequencing using Illumina HiSeq 4000. Sequence data were processed using a proprietary analysis pipeline designed to detect base substitutions, indels, copy number alterations, rearrangements, microsatellite instability (MSI), and tumor mutational burden (TMB). Results: Clinical validity was established such that the concordance between CGP and approved CDx were statistically non-inferior to that of two runs of approved CDx. For analytical validity, limit of detection (LoD) was at allele frequency 4% for known substitutions and indels. LoD was 16% tumor content for copy number amplifications, 30% for homozygous deletions, 11% for rearrangements, 12% for MSI, and 20% for TMB. Concordance with an orthogonal NGS platform was 94.6% for substitutions and indels. Within-assay reproducibility had PPA 99.4%. Conclusion: Rapid expansion of targeted therapies and CDx has necessitated a new approach and urgency to defining performance standards. We developed a comprehensive CDx assay and demonstrated clinical and analytical validity to support and accelerate using CGP for routine clinical care. Table 1. Companion Diagnostic IndicationsIndicationBiomarkerTherapyNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)EGFR exon 19 deletions and EGFR exon 21 L858R alterationsafatinib, gefitinib, or erlotinibEGFR exon 20 T790M alterationsosimertinibALK rearrangementsalectinib, crizotinib, or ceritinibBRAF V600Edabrafenib in combination with trametinibMelanomaBRAF V600Edabrafenib, vemurafenibBRAF V600E and V600Ktrametinib, cobimetinib, in combination with vemurafenibBreast cancerERBB2 (HER2) amplificationtrastuzumab, ado-trastuzumab-emtansine, or pertuzumabColorectal cancerKRAS wild-type (absence of mutations in codons 12 and 13)cetuximabKRAS and NRAS wild-type (absence of mutations in exons 2, 3, and 4)panitumumabOvarian cancerBRCA1/2 alterationsrucaparib Citation Format: James X. Sun, Yali Li, Coren Milbury, Joel Skoletsky, Christine Burns, Wai-ki Yip, Jun Luo, Ninad Dewal, Adrienne Johnson, Kyle Gowen, Jing Tong, Yuting He, Jie He, Pei Ma, Jared White, Steve Roels, John Truesdell, Eric Peters, Houston Gilbert, Charlie Wu, Erica Schleifman, Johannes Noe, Carl Barrett, Kenneth Thress, Suzanne Jenkins, Julia Elvin, Geoff Otto, Doron Lipson, Jeffrey Ross, Vincent Miller, Philip Stephens, Michael Doherty, Christine Vietz. A clinically validated comprehensive companion diagnostic platform for care of patients with advanced cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4757.

LBA9008 Background: Alectinib, a TKI targeting ALK, has shown robust efficacy in crizotinib-naïve/resistant ALK+ NSCLC. J-ALEX showed superiority of alectinib 300mg BID vs crizotinib in Japanese pts with crizotinib-naïve ALK+ NSCLC (progression-free survival [PFS] HR 0.34, p