Search

Purpose:Neoadjuvant anti–PD-1 therapy has shown promise for resectable non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reported the first phase I/II trial of neoadjuvant nivolumab in resectable NSCLC, finding it to be safe and feasible with encouraging major pathological responses (MPR). We now present 5-year clinical outcomes from this trial, representing to our knowledge, the longest follow-up data for neoadjuvant anti–PD-1 in any cancer type.Patients and Methods:Two doses of nivolumab (3 mg/kg) were administered for 4 weeks before surgery to 21 patients with Stage I–IIIA NSCLC. 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and associations with MPR and PD-L1, were evaluated.Results:With a median follow-up of 63 months, 5-year RFS and OS rates were 60% and 80%, respectively. The presence of MPR and pre-treatment tumor PD-L1 positivity (TPS ≥1%) each trended toward favorable RFS; HR, 0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15–2.44] and HR, 0.36 (95% CI, 0.07–1.85), respectively. At 5-year follow-up, 8 of 9 (89%) patients with MPR were alive and disease-free. There were no cancer-related deaths among patients with MPR. In contrast, 6/11 patients without MPR experienced tumor relapse, and 3 died.Conclusions:Five-year clinical outcomes for neoadjuvant nivolumab in resectable NSCLC compare favorably with historical outcomes. MPR and PD-L1 positivity trended toward improved RFS, though definitive conclusions are limited by cohort size.

Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improves locoregional outcomes, but recent randomized data do not support its unselected use. We assessed if tumor mutational burden (TMB) and mutations in genes associated with radiation sensitivity can select patients for PORT.Patients with resected NSCLC treated with and without PORT who underwent tumor genomic profiling were examined. The incidence of locoregional failures (LRFs) in patients with deleterious mutations in DNA damage response and repair (DDR) genes and genes associated with radiation resistance (KEAP1/NFE2L2/STK11/PIK3CA) were investigated. Cox modeling and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis assessed the relationship between TMB and locoregional control (LRC).Eighty-nine patients with NSCLC treated with PORT were analyzed, with a 2-year LRF rate of 19% (95% confidence interval, 10%-27%). Among patients treated with PORT, those with mutations in radiation resistance genes (n = 16 [18%]) had significantly more LRFs than patients without mutations (2-year LRF rate: 60% vs 11%; P.001). On multivariate analysis, radiation-resistance mutations were associated with LRF after PORT (hazard ratio, 7.42; P.001). Patients with mutations identified in DDR genes (n = 15 [17%]) had significantly improved LRC (P = .048) and no LRF events after PORT. On multivariate analysis, a higher TMB was associated with improved LRC after PORT (hazard ratio, 0.86; P = .01), and TMB was associated with PORT outcomes (area under ROC curve, 0.67-0.77). These genomic markers were not similarly associated with LRF in patients not treated with PORT.The data suggest that patients with radiation-resistance gene alterations may derive minimal benefit from PORT, whereas patients with high TMB and/or alterations in DDR genes may benefit from PORT and be suited for future precision-RT strategies. Prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings.

Human gut microbial species found to associate with clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are often tested in mice using fecal microbiota transfer (FMT), wherein tumor responses in recipient mice may recapitulate human responses to ICI treatment. However, many FMT studies have reported only limited methodological description, details of murine cohorts, and statistical methods. To investigate the reproducibility and robustness of gut microbial species that impact ICI responses, we performed human to germ-free mouse FMT using fecal samples from patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had a pathological response or nonresponse after neoadjuvant ICI treatment. R-FMT mice yielded greater anti-tumor responses in combination with anti-PD-L1 treatment compared to NR-FMT, although the magnitude varied depending on mouse cell line, sex, and individual experiment. Detailed investigation of post-FMT mouse microbiota using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, with models to classify and correct for biological variables, revealed a shared presence of the most highly abundant taxa between the human inocula and mice, though low abundance human taxa colonized mice more variably after FMT. Multiple Clostridium species also correlated with tumor outcome in individual anti-PD-L1-treated R-FMT mice. RNAseq analysis revealed differential expression of T and NK cell-related pathways in responding tumors, irrespective of FMT source, with enrichment of these cell types confirmed by immunohistochemistry. This study identifies several human gut microbial species that may play a role in clinical responses to ICIs and suggests attention to biological variables is needed to improve reproducibility and limit variability across experimental murine cohorts.

Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible oral EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor), that potently inhibits EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitizing mutations and T790M resistance mutations together with efficacy in CNS metastases in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we describe the rationale and design for the Phase III NeoADAURA study (NCT04351555), which will evaluate neoadjuvant osimertinib with or without chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone prior to surgery, in patients with resectable stage II–IIIB N2 EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. The primary end point is centrally assessed major pathological response at the time of resection. Secondary end points include event-free survival, pathological complete response, nodal downstaging at the time of surgery, disease-free survival, overall survival and health-related quality of life. Safety and tolerability will also be assessed. Trial Registration number: NCT04351555 (ClinicalTrials.gov), Lay abstract A plain language version of this article is available and is published alongside the paper online: www.futuremedicine.com/doi/suppl/10.2217/fon-2021-0549

PURPOSE For patients with surgically resected disease, multiple studies suggest a benefit of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in delaying cancer recurrence. The necessary duration of therapy for benefit is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS This randomized phase II study enrolled patients with completely resected stage IA-IIIB EGFR-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition) after stage-appropriate standard-of-care adjuvant therapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to 3 months or 2 years of adjuvant afatinib starting at 30 mg by mouth daily. Computed tomography imaging was performed every 6 months for 3 years and then annually. The primary study end point for this planned 92-patient trial was recurrence rate at 2 years from randomization. A 20% improvement (from 70% with 3 months to 90% with 2 years) was targeted. RESULTS Forty-six patients enrolled and 45 were treated. The assigned course of afatinib treatment was completed by 96% (22/23) of patients in the 3-month group and only 41% (9/22) in the 2-year group. The 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 70% in the 3-month group and 81% in the 2-year group ( P = .55). The median RFS was 42.8 months in the 3-month group and 58.6 months in the 2-year group. Side effects were consistent with those previously described for afatinib. CONCLUSION Recurrences at 2 years were 11% less common with 2 years versus 3 months of adjuvant afatinib. This difference did not meet the 20% primary study target, likely because of underaccrual and early drug discontinuation on the 2-year group. With the availability of osimertinib with better efficacy and tolerability than earlier-generation agents, the optimal duration of adjuvant EGFR TKI therapy remains an important question.

The treatment goal for patients with early-stage lung cancer is cure. Multidisciplinary discussions of surgical resectability and medical operability determine the modality of definitive local treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) and the associated systemic therapies to further improve the likelihood of cure. Trial evidence supports cisplatin-based adjuvant therapy either after surgical resection or concurrently with radiotherapy. Consensus guidelines support neoadjuvant chemotherapy in lieu of adjuvant chemotherapy and carboplatin-based regimens for patients who are ineligible for cisplatin. The incorporation of newer agents, now standard for patients with stage IV lung cancer, into the curative therapy paradigm has lagged owing to inefficient trial designs, the lengthy follow-up needed to assess survival end points and a developmental focus on the advanced-stage disease setting. Surrogate end points, such as pathological response, are being studied and might shorten trial durations. In 2018, the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab was approved for patients with stage III lung cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Since then, the study of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in patients with early-stage lung cancer has rapidly expanded. In this Review, we present the current considerations in the treatment of patients with early-stage lung cancer and explore the current and future state of clinical research to develop systemic therapies for non-metastatic lung cancer. The authors of this Review present the current considerations in the treatment of patients with early-stage lung cancer, discussing the critical determination of resectability by thoracic surgical oncologists and the management of both resectable and unresectable disease with a focus on systemic therapy selection. They also address innovations in drug development, trial design and efforts to identify early-stage cancers.

Background LCMC3 (NCT02927301), an open-label, single-arm Phase 2 study to investigate neoadjuvant (neoadj) and adj atezo (anti-PD-L1) in patients (pts) with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), met its primary endpoint with a 20% major pathological response (MPR) rate after neoadj atezo. Here we report efficacy and safety from the adj phase. Methods Eligible pts aged ≥18 y had resectable stage IB-IIIA or select IIIB NSCLC and ECOG PS of 0 or 1. Pts received neoadj atezo 1200 mg IV for ≤2 cycles (Days 1 and 22) followed by surgery (Day 40±10). Pts deemed to have clinical benefit were offered the option to receive adj atezo every 3 weeks for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint was MPR rate (≤10% viable tumor cells at surgery) in pts without EGFR/ALK mutations. Exploratory endpoints included DFS and OS. Safety was assessed during the adj phase. Results Data cutoff was Oct 21, 2022. The primary efficacy population (PEP) was 137 pts without EGFR/ALK alterations who had surgery and MPR assessment. In the PEP, 53 pts (39%) received adj atezo and 84 (61%) did not. The 3-y DFS rate was 83% with adj atezo vs 64% without (HR, 0.43; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.90; P=0.025). 3-y OS and results by MPR status are provided in the table. In the adj atezo safety population (n=57), treatment-related (TR) AEs after adj atezo occurred in 55 pts (97%; Gr 3/4, 40%), including 11 TRAEs (19%; Gr 3/4, 16%) leading to discontinuation of adj atezo. No Gr 5 TRAEs were seen in the adj phase. Multivariate analysis also showed a trend toward better DFS for pts receiving adj atezo vs those with no adj atezo (HR, 0.52; 95% CI: 0.22, 1.21; P=0.126). Conclusions This exploratory analysis revealed that LCMC3 pts with resectable stage IB-IIIA or select IIIB NSCLC who received adj atezo had improved DFS and showed a trend toward improved OS vs pts who did not receive adj atezo. Furthermore, the non-MPR subgroup had the same trend toward improved DFS and OS with adj atezo vs pts who did not receive adj atezo. Adj atezo was well tolerated, with no new safety concerns. Table Adj atezoa n=53 No adj atezob n=84 Tx patterns Adj atezo + adj chemo, n (%) 17 (32) 0 Adj atezo, n (%) 36 (68) 0 Adj chemo, n (%) 0 36 (43) None, n (%) 0 48 (57) Tx cycles Adj atezo, n, median (range) 53, 16 (1-18) 0 Adj chemo, n, median (range) 16, 3 (0-4.2) 35, 3 (0-4.1) HR (95% CI) P PEP (N=137) 3-y DFS, % 83 64 0.43 (0.21, 0.90) 0.025 3-y OS, % 89 77 0.48 (0.19, 1.21) 0.118 MPR (n=29) n=22 n=7 3-y DFS, % 86 86 0.93 (0.10, 8.92) 0.948 Non-MPR (n=108) n=31 n=77 3-y DFS, % 80 62 0.48 (0.20, 1.12) 0.088 3-y OS, % 87 75 0.49 (0.17, 1.46) 0.202 Multivariable Cox regression (n=114)c MPR vs non-MPR 0.37 (0.11, 1.31) 0.125 Adj atezo vs no adj atezo 0.52 (0.22, 1.21) 0.126 Adj chemo vs no adj chemo 0.57 (0.27, 1.19) 0.133 Stage I/II vs III 0.71 (0.35, 1.43) 0.338 PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥1% vs Citation Format: David Paul Carbone, Saiama N. Waqar, Jamie E. Chaft, Mark G. Kris, Bruce E. Johnson, Jay M. Lee, Ignacio I. Wistuba, David Kwiatkowski, Paul Bunn, Katja Schulze, Ann Johnson, Evelise Brandao, Mark Awad, Karen L. Reckamp, Anne C. Chiang, Alan Nicholas, Valerie Rusch. Efficacy and safety of adjuvant (adj) atezolizumab (atezo) from the Phase 2 LCMC3 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT215.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and thoracic radiotherapy are increasingly used to treat advanced cancers. Despite data indicating exaggerated radiation toxicities in patients with autoimmune disease, the safety of thoracic radiotherapy in patients with prior ICI-associated immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is undefined. Patients and methods Patients treated from 2014 to 2020 with ICIs were queried for receipt of corticosteroids and radiotherapy. Patients who received thoracic radiation after symptomatic irAEs were assessed for ≥grade 2 radiation pneumonitis (RP). Characteristics predictive of RP were assessed using logistic regression and response relationships were modeled. Results Among 496 assessed patients, 41 with irAE history subsequently treated with thoracic radiotherapy were analyzed. Most irAEs were grade 2 (n = 21) and 3 (n = 19). Median time from irAE onset to radiotherapy was 8.1 months. Most patients received stereotactic body radiation therapy (n = 20) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (n = 18). In total, 25 patients (61%) developed ≥grade 2 RP at a median of 4 months from radiotherapy and 11 months from onset of irAEs. Three months from RP onset, 16 of 24 (67%) assessable patients had persistent symptoms. Among patients with prior ICI pneumonitis (n = 6), five patients (83%) developed ≥grade 2 RP (grade 2, n = 3; grade ≥3, n = 2). The mean lung radiation dose (MLD) predicted for RP (odds ratio: 1.60, P = 0.00002). The relationship between MLD and RP was strong (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.85) and showed an exaggerated dose-response. Among patients with an MLD >5 Gy (n = 26), 21 patients (81%) developed ≥grade 2 RP. Conclusion This is the first study assessing the toxicity of radiotherapy among patients with prior irAEs from ICIs. Patients with prior irAEs were found to be at very high risk for clinically significant and persistent RP from thoracic radiotherapy. Careful consideration should be given to the possibility of an increased risk of RP, and close monitoring is recommended in these patients.

BackgroundDespite treatment advancements with immunotherapy, our understanding of response relies on tissue-based, static tumor features such as tumor mutation burden (TMB) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. These approaches are limited in capturing the plasticity of tumor–immune system interactions under selective pressure of immune checkpoint blockade and predicting therapeutic response and long-term outcomes. Here, we investigate the relationship between serial assessment of peripheral blood cell counts and tumor burden dynamics in the context of an evolving tumor ecosystem during immune checkpoint blockade.MethodsUsing machine learning, we integrated dynamics in peripheral blood immune cell subsets, including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), from 239 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and predicted clinical outcome with immune checkpoint blockade. We then sought to interpret NLR dynamics in the context of transcriptomic and T cell repertoire trajectories for 26 patients with early stage NSCLC who received neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade. We further determined the relationship between NLR dynamics, pathologic response and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) clearance.ResultsIntegrated dynamics of peripheral blood cell counts, predominantly NLR dynamics and changes in eosinophil levels, predicted clinical outcome, outperforming both TMB and PD-L1 expression. As early changes in NLR were a key predictor of response, we linked NLR dynamics with serial RNA sequencing deconvolution and T cell receptor sequencing to investigate differential tumor microenvironment reshaping during therapy for patients with reduction in peripheral NLR. Reductions in NLR were associated with induction of interferon-γ responses driving the expression of antigen presentation and proinflammatory gene sets coupled with reshaping of the intratumoral T cell repertoire. In addition, NLR dynamics reflected tumor regression assessed by pathological responses and complemented ctDNA kinetics in predicting long-term outcome. Elevated peripheral eosinophil levels during immune checkpoint blockade were correlated with therapeutic response in both metastatic and early stage cohorts.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that early dynamics in peripheral blood immune cell subsets reflect changes in the tumor microenvironment and capture antitumor immune responses, ultimately reflecting clinical outcomes with immune checkpoint blockade.

Structured Abstract Background Patients with lung cancers may have disproportionately severe COVID-19 outcomes. Understanding the patient-specific and cancer-specific features that impact severity of COVID-19 may inform optimal cancer care during this pandemic. Patients and methods We examined consecutive patients with lung cancer and confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 (n=102) at a single center from March 12-May 6, 2020. Thresholds of severity were defined a priori as hospitalization, ICU/intubation/DNI (a composite metric of severe disease including ICU stay, intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation, and/or transition to do not intubate [DNI]), or death. Recovery was defined as >14 days from COVID-19 test and >3 days since symptom resolution. HLA alleles were inferred from MSK-IMPACT (n=46) and compared to controls with lung cancer and no known non-COVID-19 (n=5166). Results COVID-19 was severe in patients with lung cancer (62% hospitalized, 25% died). Although severe, COVID-19 accounted for a minority of overall lung cancer-deaths during the pandemic (11% overall). Determinants of COVID-19 severity were largely patient-specific features, including smoking status and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Odds ratios for severe COVID-19 2.9, 95% CI 1.07-9.44 comparing the median [23.5 pack-years] to never and 3.87, 95% CI 1.35-9.68, respectively). Cancer-specific features, including prior thoracic surgery/radiation and recent systemic therapies did not impact severity. HLA supertypes were generally similar in mild or severe cases of COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 controls. Most patients recovered from COVID-19, including 25% patients initially requiring intubation. Among hospitalized patients, hydroxychloroquine did not improve COVID-19 outcomes. Conclusion COVID-19 is associated with high burden of severity in patients with lung cancer. Patient-specific features, rather than cancer-specific features or treatments, are the greatest determinants of severity., Highlights • COVID-19 is associated with high burden of severity in patients with lung cancer. • Patient-specific features, rather than cancer-specific features or treatments, are the greatest determinants of severity.

Background and purpose Concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) and durvalumab is standard therapy for patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Data is limited on outcomes with this regimen outside of clinical trials. Local-regional control rates remain undefined. Materials and methods We reviewed patients with stage III unresectable NSCLCs treated between November 2017 and February 2019 with cCRT and ≥1 dose of durvalumab. We examined 12-month progression-free-survival (PFS), overall-survival (OS), toxicities, and the incidence and pattern of local–regional and metastatic failures. Results Sixty-two patients (median follow-up 12 months) with median age of 66 years of which 73% had stage IIIB (n = 33) or IIIC (n = 12) disease started durvalumab a median of 1.5 months from the end of cCRT and were treated with a median of 8 months of durvalumab. Common reasons for stopping durvalumab included disease progression (32%, 20/62) and toxicity (24%, 15/62). The estimated 12-month PFS and OS were 65% (95% CI: 51–79%) and 85% (95% CI: 75–95%), respectively. The cumulative 12-month incidence of local–regional and distant failures were 18% (95% CI: 5.9–30%) and 30% (95% CI: 16.3–44.5%), respectively. Among patients with distant metastatic disease (n = 17), 47% had oligometastatic disease. High tumor mutation burden (≥8.8 mt/Mb) or PD-L1 (≥1% or PD-L1 ≥ 50%) did not predict improved PFS. Conclusions Outcomes with cCRT and durvalumab in practice align with the PACIFIC trial. A substantial minority of patients are candidates for metastasis-directed therapies at progression. Local regional outcomes appear improved to historical data of cCRT alone.

Introduction Durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) is now standard of care for unresected stage III non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is limited data on radiation pneumonitis (RP) with this regimen. Therefore, we assessed RP and evaluated previously validated toxicity models in predicting for RP in patients treated with cCRT and durvalumab. Methods Patients treated with cCRT and ≥ 1 dose of durvalumab were evaluated to identify cases of ≥ grade 2 RP. The validity of previously published RP models was assessed in this cohort as well a reference cohort treated with cCRT alone. The timing and incidence of RP was compared between cohorts. Results In total, 11 (18%) of the 62 patients who received cCRT and durvalumab developed ≥ grade 2 RP a median of 3.4 months after cCRT. The onset of RP among patients treated with cCRT and durvalumab was significantly longer vs the reference cohort (3.4 vs 2.1 months; P = .01). Numerically more patients treated with cCRT and durvalumab developed RP than patients in the reference cohort (18% vs 9%, P = .09). Among patients treated with cCRT and durvalumab, 82% (n = 9) were responsive to treatment with high‐dose glucocorticoids. Previously published RP models widely underestimated the rate of RP in patients treated with cCRT and durvalumab [AUC ~ 0.50; p(Hosmer‐Lemeshow): 0.98‐1.00]. Conclusions Our data suggest a delayed onset of RP in patients treated with cCRT and durvalumab vs cCRT alone, and for RP to develop in a greater number of patients treated with cCRT and durvalumab. Previously published RP models significantly underestimate the rate of symptomatic RP among patients treated with cCRT and durvalumab., Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a significant toxicity of thoracic radiation, yet little is known regarding RP in lung cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation (cCRT) and durvalumab. We found patients treated with cCRT and durvalumab to have a significantly later onset of RP and a greater frequency of RP compared to patients treated with cCRT alone, we also found previously published toxicity models to be unsuccessful in predicting for RP among patients treated with cCRT and durvalumab.

The PACIFIC trial of durvalumab administered for 1 year to patients with stage III lung cancers has set a new standard of care. PACIFIC established the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for individuals with inoperable and unresectable locally advanced lung cancers that achieve disease control from concurrent chemoradiation. For patients with resectable and operable disease, ICIs administered before surgery, either alone (JHU/MSK, LCMC3, and NEOSTAR) or in combination with chemotherapy (Columbia/MGH and NADIM), have yielded high rates of major pathologic response in resection specimens, an outcome measure that correlates with improved progression-free survival and overall survival. These results have brought forth the dilemma of how to choose the optimal local therapy—either definitive concurrent chemoradiation or surgery—to use with an ICI for patients with stage III lung cancers that are both operable and resectable. Here, we review the data that support the use of each local therapy. Recent successes have also raised the possibility that using ICIs in patients with earlier stages of lung cancer will enhance curability. Randomized trials are underway; however, until they read out, physicians must choose between local and systemic therapies on the basis of the information we have today. Research demonstrates that using surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and ICIs improve all efficacy outcomes and curability. All modalities should be considered in every patient with locally advanced lung cancer. It is imperative that a multimodality discussion that includes the possible addition of ICIs takes place to choose the best modality and sequence of therapies for each patient.

Purpose:Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade is a promising treatment for resectable non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet immunologic mechanisms contributing to tumor regression and biomarkers of response are unknown. Using paired tumor/blood samples from a phase II clinical trial (NCT02259621), we explored whether the peripheral T-cell clonotypic dynamics can serve as a biomarker for response to neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade.Experimental Design:T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing was performed on serial peripheral blood, tumor, and normal lung samples from resectable NSCLC patients treated with neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade. We explored the temporal dynamics of the T-cell repertoire in the peripheral and tumoral compartments in response to neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade by using the TCR as a molecular barcode.Results:Higher intratumoral TCR clonality was associated with reduced percent residual tumor at the time of surgery, and the TCR repertoire of tumors with major pathologic response (MPR; Conclusions:Our study suggests that exchange of T-cell clones between tumor and blood represents a key correlate of pathologic response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy and shows that the periphery may be a previously underappreciated originating compartment for effective antitumor immunity.See related commentary by Henick, p. 1205

PURPOSE Response to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade is often conceptualized as resulting from reinvigoration of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. However, recruited antitumor immunity from the periphery may also be an important contributor to response. A detailed assessment of the response dynamics of individual metastasis could provide insight to the systemic and local features that mediate response and resistance to immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or mismatch repair deficiency (MMRD) carcinoma treated with PD-1 monotherapy were evaluated independently. Absolute and percent change of each target lesion were quantified at each computed tomography scan using RECIST. Patterns of progression were predefined as systemic or mixed and were correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS A total of 761 individual lesions from 214 patients with NSCLC and 290 lesions from 78 patients with MMRD carcinoma were examined. Individual target lesion responses aligned with best overall response of each patient (85% NSCLC and 93% MMRD lesions responded in patients with partial response/complete response). In responding patients, timing of response was uniform (73% NSCLC and 76% MMRD lesions responded synchronously), and deeper responses were associated with prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival. By contrast, at progression, mixed progression was common (45% of NSCLC and 53% of MMRD) and associated with improved survival compared with those who experienced systemic progression (NSCLC hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P = .001; MMRD HR, 0.40; P = .07). Organ sites had differential responses, with lymph node and liver metastasis among the most and least responsive, respectively. CONCLUSION Temporal-spatial patterns of response across individual metastases tend to be uniform, favoring the role of peripheral, clonally directed antitumor immunity as a key mediator of response to PD-1 blockade. In contrast, progression is more heterogeneous, potentially revealing the clinical importance of local features and intertumoral heterogeneity.

BACKGROUND: The impact of peripheral blood immune measures and radiation-induced lymphopenia on outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) and immune check point inhibition (ICI) has yet to be fully defined. METHODS: Stage III NSCLC patients treated with cCRT and ≥1 dose of durvalumab across a cancer center were examined. Peripheral blood counts were assessed pre-cCRT, during cCRT and at the start of ICI. These measures and risk-scores from two published models estimating radiation dose to immune-bearing organs were tested for association with disease control. RESULTS: We assessed 113 patients treated with cCRT and a median of 8.5 months of durvalumab. Median PFS was 29 months (95% CI 18–35 months). A lower pre-cCRT ALC (HR: 0.51 (95% CI: 0.32–0.82), p=0.02) and a higher pre-cCRT ANC (HR: 1.14 (1.06–1.23), p=0.005) were associated with poor PFS. Neither ALC nadir, ALC at ICI start, ANC at ICI start or the normalized change in ALC from pre-cCRT to nadir were significantly associated with PFS (p=0.07–0.49). Also, risk scores from the two radiation-dose models were not associated with PFS (p=0.14, p=0.21) but were so with the ALC Nadir (p=0.001, p=0.002). A higher pre-cCRT NLR was the strongest predictor for PFS (HR: 1.09 (1.05–1.14), p=0.0001). The 12-month PFS in patients with the bottom vs. top NLR tertile was 84% vs 46% (p=0.000004). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline differences in peripheral immune cell populations are associated with disease outcomes in NSCLC patients treated with cCRT and ICI.

OBJECTIVES: Liquid biopsy for plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) can detect ALK fusions, though data on clinical utility of this technology in the real world is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with lung cancer without known oncogenic drivers or who had acquired resistance to therapy (n = 736) underwent prospective plasma ctDNA NGS. A subset of this cohort (n = 497) also had tissue NGS. We evaluated ALK fusion detection, turnaround time (TAT), plasma and tissue concordance, matching to therapy, and treatment response. RESULTS: ctDNA identified an ALK fusion in 21 patients (3%) with a variety of breakpoints and fusion partners, including EML4, CLTC, and PON1, a novel ALK fusion partner. TAT for ctDNA NGS was shorter than tissue NGS (10 vs. 20 days; p

Introduction: ROS1 fusions are oncogenic drivers in 1% to 3% of NSCLCs. The activity of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy (chemotherapy with ICI [chemo-ICI]) in these tumors and their immunophenotype have not been systematically described. Methods: In this multi-institutional retrospective study, tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were evaluated in patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. Time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and objective response rate (ORR) (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1) were calculated for patients treated with ICI or chemo-ICI in the metastatic setting. Results: A total of 184 patients were identified. Among 146 assessable cases, PD-L1 expression was less than 1% in 60 (41%), 1% to 49% in 35 (24%), and greater than or equal to 50% in 51 tumors (35%). Of 100 (92%) TMB-assessable tumors, 92 had less than 10 mutations per megabase. TMB was significantly lower for ROS1-rearranged tumors (n = 97) compared with tumors with EGFR (n = 1250) or KRAS alterations (n = 1653) and all other NSCLC tumors (n = 2753) evaluated with Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (median TMB = 2.6 versus 3.5, 7.0, and 6.1 mutations per megabase, p < 0.001). Among patients treated with ICI, median TTD was 2.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0–4.2 mo; n = 28) and ORR 13% (2 of 16 RECIST-assessable; 95% CI: 2%–38%). Among patients treated with chemo-ICI, median TTD was 10 months (95% CI: 4.7–14.1 mo; n = 11) and ORR 83% (5 of 6 RECIST-assessable; 95% CI: 36%–100%). There was no difference in PD-L1 expression (p = 0.91) or TMB (p = 0.83) between responders and nonresponders. Conclusions: Most ROS1-rearranged NSCLCs have low PD-L1 expression and TMB. The activity of ICI in these tumors is modest. In contrast, chemo-ICI can achieve meaningful activity.

Despite the initial successes of immunotherapy, there is an urgent clinical need for molecular assays that identify patients more likely to respond. Here, we report that ultrasensitive measures of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and T-cell expansion can be used to assess responses to immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic lung cancer patients (N = 24). Patients with clinical response to therapy had a complete reduction in ctDNA levels after initiation of therapy, whereas nonresponders had no significant changes or an increase in ctDNA levels. Patients with initial response followed by acquired resistance to therapy had an initial drop followed by recrudescence in ctDNA levels. Patients without a molecular response had shorter progression-free and overall survival compared with molecular responders [5.2 vs. 14.5 and 8.4 vs. 18.7 months; HR 5.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.57–18.35; P = 0.007 and HR 6.91; 95% CI, 1.37–34.97; P = 0.02, respectively], which was detected on average 8.7 weeks earlier and was more predictive of clinical benefit than CT imaging. Expansion of T cells, measured through increases of T-cell receptor productive frequencies, mirrored ctDNA reduction in response to therapy. We validated this approach in an independent cohort of patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (N = 14), where the therapeutic effect was measured by pathologic assessment of residual tumor after anti-PD1 therapy. Consistent with our initial findings, early ctDNA dynamics predicted pathologic response to immune checkpoint blockade. These analyses provide an approach for rapid determination of therapeutic outcomes for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and have important implications for the development of personalized immune targeted strategies. Significance: Rapid and sensitive detection of circulating tumor DNA dynamic changes and T-cell expansion can be used to guide immune targeted therapy for patients with lung cancer. See related commentary by Zou and Meyerson, p. 1038

8540 Background: The standard of care for patients with inoperable early stage or locally advanced NSCLC is definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or conventional radiation therapy (RT) with systemic therapy. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing can be used for the assessment of MRD and predict risk of recurrence. Few studies have prospectively evaluated MRD detection and ctDNA dynamics specifically among patients with early or locally advanced NSCLC receiving definitive RT. Methods: In a prospective clinical cohort of patients with stage I-III NSCLC (n = 17), serial plasma samples (n = 70) were collected before and after SBRT as well as before, during, and after conventional RT with or without concurrent systemic therapy and adjuvant durvalumab. Patients were followed-up for a median of 29 months (range: 4 to 54 months) with the last serial plasma collected at a median of 5 months from completion of RT (range: 1 – 26 months). A personalized, tumor-informed multiplex PCR assay (Signatera™ bespoke mPCR NGS assay) was used for the detection and quantification of ctDNA and tracked 16 tumor variants among 16 patients and 15 tumor variants in one patient. This study evaluated the prognostic value of ctDNA, correlating MRD status with clinical outcomes, in addition to ctDNA clearance kinetics during RT. Results: Among 17 patients with early-stage and locally advanced NSCLC, baseline ctDNA was detected in 82% of patients (14/17). Clinical progression was confirmed radiographically for 53% (9/17). All events of clinical progression were detectable by ctDNA (sensitivity 100%, 0.63 – 1.0), with a median lead-time of 5.5 months for MRD detection compared to radiographic disease progression. Durable ctDNA clearance was observed in 29% (5/17) of patients, all of whom then remained recurrence-free until the end of follow-up (median 12 months; specificity 100%, 95% CI 0.6 – 1.0). Transient ctDNA clearance was observed in 3 patients, and recurrent ctDNA was detected before or at the time of disease progression in all 3. ctDNA status after treatment at a single time point and longitudinally were highly predictive of disease recurrence (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: ctDNA detection is feasible for patients with stage I-III NSCLC undergoing definitive chemoradiation. and can serve as a powerful predictive biomarker for disease recurrence. High baseline detection rate is essential for feasibility of a ctDNA-based MRD assay. Residual detectable ctDNA represents a powerful predictive tool to identify patients who might benefit from intensification of adjuvant therapy following definitive RT.

9052 Background: Single agent PD-(L)-1 blockade (IO) and PD-(L)-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy (ChemoIO) are both standard first-line treatments for patients with PD-L1-high (≥ 50%) metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These regimens have not been compared prospectively, so comparative effectiveness is unclear. It is also unknown if clinical and molecular tumor characteristics differentially associate with benefit to IO vs ChemoIO in patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 tumor expression. Methods: All patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with IO or ChemoIO at two institutions (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) were reviewed. Patients with EGFR or ALK alterations, PD-L1 expression < 50%, treated with IO or ChemoIO in > 1st line setting were excluded. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between the IO vs ChemoIO groups and association with clinical, pathologic, and molecular features was examined. To account for NGS panel differences, tumor mutational burden (TMB) values were harmonized using a z-score conversion as previously described (Vokes et al, 2019). Results: Of 639 patients with stage IV EGFR/ ALK wild-type NSCLC and PD-L1 ≥50% treated in the 1st line setting, 504 received IO and 135 received ChemoIO. Baseline ECOG performance status (p = 0.3), median PD-L1 % (p > 0.9) and TMB (p = 0.2) were similar between the IO and ChemoIO groups. For patients receiving IO vs ChemoIO, there was no significant difference in OS (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.08; p = 0.2). Median PFS was shorter (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.9; p = 0.004) and ORR was lower (40% IO vs 55% ChemoIO, p = 0.002) in the IO group. Among patients with durable responses (> 6 months), never smokers were less common in the IO group (6% vs 18%, p < 0.001), but there was no difference in PD-L1 expression, TMB, or mutational ( KRAS, STK11, or KEAP1) profile to suggest differential predictors of benefit to IO or ChemoIO. Conclusions: In patients with PD-L1 high NSCLC, there was no survival benefit associated with the addition of chemotherapy to IO. There were also no clear differences in PD-L1 expression or molecular features associated with durable response to IO vs ChemoIO. These findings have implications for treatment selection in this population.

TPS8596 Background: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has transformed the care of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), giving many patients access to precision targeted treatment and immunotherapy with remarkable improvements in outcomes. Studies show that patients with lung cancers with oncogenic drivers are the least likely group to benefit from checkpoint inhibitors and are better served by enrollment in studies of targeted therapies. Early-stage NSCLC is now poised to benefit from these precision approaches with the regulatory approval of the first tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors for the adjuvant treatment of resected NSCLC, each requiring testing for precision biomarkers. Neoadjuvant precision therapy for NSCLC has the potential to further improve treatment outcomes. Methods: The LCMC4 Evaluation of Actionable Drivers in EaRly Stage Lung Cancer (LEADER) Neoadjuvant Screening Trial (NCT04712877) is a collaborative diagnostic study developed by the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium (LCMC), supported by the Thoracic Surgery Oncology Group and the Lung Cancer Research Foundation. The primary objective is to determine the proportion of patients with stage IA2-III lung cancers who possess actionable oncogenic drivers, defined as 1 of 11 actionable genomic alterations: mutations in EGFR, BRAFV600E, MET exon 14, KRAS G12C, and HER2, rearrangements in ALK, RET, NTRK, and ROS1, and amplification of MET and HER2. The study will also assess the feasibility of CGP to detect actionable oncogenic drivers in patients with suspected early-stage lung cancers scheduled to undergo biopsies to establish the diagnosis of lung cancer. The protocol will enroll 1000 patients with operable stage IA2-III (TNM 8th edition) lung cancer who will undergo CGP utilizing the Foundation Medicine 324 gene assay as well as paired liquid biopsy analysis. Results will enable selection of neoadjuvant therapy and enrollment onto independent therapeutic trials with genomically matched neoadjuvant treatment, standard therapies, or other trials if no driver is detected. The approach will be considered feasible if >35% of non-squamous NSCLCs have 1 of the 11 actionable alterations. Tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 IHC will be assessed. Plasma specimens collected pre- and post neoadjuvant treatment and post-surgery will be used for research to study the ability of circulating tumor DNA to assess neoadjuvant treatment response and minimal residual disease. 26 academic sites in the US plan to enroll patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04712877.

8537 Background: Neoadjuvant (neoadj) immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with anti-PD-1 therapy has shown increasing promise for early stage NSCLC, with long-term clinical outcomes still maturing. Our group reported the first phase I/II trial of neoadj nivolumab (nivo) in resectable NSCLC, finding therapy to be safe and feasible. We now present final clinical results from this cohort, representing the longest follow up data for neoadj anti-PD-1 to date. Methods: Two doses of neoadj nivo (3 mg/kg) were given prior to resection in 21 patients (pts) with resectable NSCLC. 5-year (yr) follow-up data, including recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and association with pathologic response were tabulated. Event time distributions were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. All p-values are two-sided with 0.05 significance level. Results: At a median follow up of 63 months, 3-, 4- and 5-yr survival rates were 85, 80, and 80% respectively. RFS rates at 3-, 4- and 5-yrs were 65, 60, and 60% respectively. As previously reported, major pathologic response (MPR: ≤10% viable tumor) was 45%, and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 10%. The hazard ratio (HR) for pathologic down-staging was in the direction of improved RFS, without meeting statistical significance (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.07-1.75, p = 0.2). RFS HR estimates for MPR and an alternative pathologic cut-off of less than 50% residual tumor (RT), were 0.61, (95% CI 0.15-2.44, p = 0.48) and 0.36, (95% CI 0.09-1.51, p = 0.16) respectively. The direction of the effect of pre-treatment PD-L1 positivity (≥1%) was to improve RFS (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.07-1.85, p = 0.22). At 5-yr follow up, 8 of 9 (89%) pts with MPR were alive and no cancer deaths have occurred. Amongst pts with MPR, 1/9 pts had a cancer recurrence in the mediastinum treated successfully with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Both pts with pCR are alive and without recurrence. Patterns of all recurrences in this cohort are summarized in table 1. No long-term immune-related adverse events have occurred other than one G3 dermatologic event. Conclusions: The 5-yr clinical outcomes for neoadj nivo in resectable NSCLC compare favorably to historical trends. MPR trended toward improved RFS, while definitive conclusions are limited by our cohort size and overall low recurrence rate. Thresholds of %RT beyond pCR and MPR in this setting should be explored in larger prospective studies. PD-L1 expression may play a role in predicting long-term response, but larger prospective studies are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT02259621. [Table: see text]

Introduction KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant NSCLCs are chemoradiation resistant and at high risk for local-regional failure (LRF) after concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT). To elucidate the impact of durvalumab on local-regional control, we evaluated LRF in patients with NSCLC treated with cCRT with and without durvalumab. Methods Patients with stage III NSCLC treated with cCRT or cCRT and durvalumab who underwent tumor genomic profiling were evaluated. The incidence of LRF and outcomes of patients with and without KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors were evaluated. Results We analyzed 120 consecutive patients (cCRT alone, n = 54; cCRT and durvalumab, n = 66). Patients treated with cCRT alone had significantly more LRF events compared with those treated with cCRT and durvalumab, with 12-month LRF incidence of 39% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24%–54%) and 18% (95% CI: 8%–28%), respectively (p = 0.002). Among patients treated with cCRT alone and cCRT and durvalumab, 20 patients (37%) and 18 patients (27%), respectively, had KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors. In patients treated with cCRT alone, those with KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors had worse local-regional control (p = 0.015), and on multivariate analysis, KEAP1-NFE2L2 mutation predicted for LRF (hazard ratio = 3.9, 95% CI: 1.6–9.8, p = 0.003). Nevertheless, patients with and without KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors had similar LRF outcomes (p = 0.541) when treated with cCRT and durvalumab, and mutational status did not predict for LRF (p = 0.545). Among those with KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors, cCRT and durvalumab significantly reduced the incidence of LRF compared with cCRT alone: 12-month LRF incidence of 62% (95% CI: 40%–84%) versus 25% (95% CI: 4%–46%), respectively (p = 0.021). Conclusions Durvalumab after cCRT significantly improves local-regional control and reduces LRF in chemoradiation-resistant KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant NSCLC tumors.

The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus is an established therapy for well-differentiated (WD) foregut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Pre-clinical data demonstrates a potential synergistic role for cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition and everolimus to treat this disease. In this phase II multicenter study, patients with advanced foregut WDNETs received combination ribociclib and everolimus until confirmed disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The first 12 patients received ribociclib 300 mg three weeks in a row with a 1 week break and everolimus 2.5 mg daily (recommended phase II dose). Due to unexpected hematologic and infectious toxicities, the trial was put on hold, modified, and an additional 9 patients received ribociclib 200 mg and everolimus 2.5 mg daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Archived pre-treatment tumor was profiled by next-generation sequencing to evaluate for genomic markers of drug response. Twenty-one patients were treated (median age, 56; range, 24 to 77). The study did not meet the pre-specified criteria to advance to stage two. No patients experienced an objective response. Thirteen patients (62%) experienced stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 2.8 months to not reached). Eleven of the first 12 patients (92%) developed grade 2 or more myelosuppression. Ten patients (84%) experienced treatment interruption and 8 patients (67%) required dose reduction. Genetic testing in archival tumor tissue samples failed to identify a predictive biomarker of disease stabilization. The combination of ribociclib and everolimus had insufficient activity to warrant further investigation in foregut WDNETs.

IMPORTANCE: Recommendations for adjuvant therapy after surgical resection of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are based solely on TNM classification but are agnostic to genomic and high-risk clinicopathologic factors. Creation of a prediction model that integrates tumor genomic and clinicopathologic factors may better identify patients at risk for recurrence. OBJECTIVE: To identify tumor genomic factors independently associated with recurrence, even in the presence of aggressive, high-risk clinicopathologic variables, in patients with completely resected stages I to III LUAD, and to develop a computational machine-learning prediction model (PRecur) to determine whether the integration of genomic and clinicopathologic features could better predict risk of recurrence, compared with the TNM system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study included 426 patients treated from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017, at a single large cancer center and selected in consecutive samples. Eligibility criteria included complete surgical resection of stages I to III LUAD, broad-panel next-generation sequencing data with matched clinicopathologic data, and no neoadjuvant therapy. External validation of the PRecur prediction model was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Data were analyzed from 2014 to 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The study end point consisted of relapse-free survival (RFS), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier approach. Associations among clinicopathologic factors, genomic alterations, and RFS were established using Cox proportional hazards regression. The PRecur prediction model integrated genomic and clinicopathologic factors using gradient-boosting survival regression for risk group generation and prediction of RFS. A concordance probability estimate (CPE) was used to assess the predictive ability of the PRecur model. RESULTS: Of the 426 patients included in the analysis (286 women [67%]; median age at surgery, 69 [interquartile range, 62-75] years), 318 (75%) had stage I cancer. Association analysis showed that alterations in SMARCA4 (clinicopathologic-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.44; 95% CI, 1.03-5.77; P = .042) and TP53 (clinicopathologic-adjusted HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.09-2.73; P = .02) and the fraction of genome altered (clinicopathologic-adjusted HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.10-1.04; P = .005) were independently associated with RFS. The PRecur prediction model outperformed the TNM-based model (CPE, 0.73 vs 0.61; difference, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.05-0.19]; P

PURPOSE: Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a common and potentially life-threatening toxicity from lung cancer radiotherapy. Data sets reporting RP rates after post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) have historically been small and with predominantly outdated field designs and radiation techniques. We examined a large cohort of patients in this context to assess the incidence and causes of RP in the modern era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 285 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PORT at our institution from 5/2004 to 1/2017. Complete dosimetric data and clinical records were reviewed and analyzed with grade 2 or higher RP as the endpoint (RP2+) (CTCAE v4.0). Patients were a median of 67 yo (range 28-87), and most had pathologic stage III NSCLC (91%) and received trimodality therapy (90%). Systematic dosimetric analyses using Dx increments of 5% and Vx increments of 2Gy were performed to robustly evaluate dosimetric variables. Lung V(5) was also evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of RP2+ after PORT was 12.6%. Dosimetric factors most associated with RP2+ were total lungV(4) (HR 1.04, p

BackgroundWe conducted the first trial of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), finding nivolumab monotherapy to be safe and feasible with an encouraging rate of pathologic response. Building on these results, and promising data for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) in advanced NSCLC, we expanded our study to include an arm investigating neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab.MethodsPatients with resectable stage IB (≥4 cm)–IIIA (American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor Node Metastases seventh edition), histologically confirmed, treatment-naïve NSCLC received nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously 6 weeks prior to planned resection. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was given again approximately 4 and 2 weeks preoperatively. Primary endpoints were safety and feasibility with a planned enrollment of 15 patients. Pathologic response was a key secondary endpoint.ResultsWhile the treatment regimen was feasible per protocol, due to toxicity, the study arm was terminated early by investigator consensus after 9 of 15 patients were enrolled. All patients received every scheduled dose of therapy and were fit for planned surgery; however, 6 of 9 (67%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 3 (33%) experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. Three of 9 patients (33%) had biopsy-confirmed tumor progression precluding definitive surgery. Of the 6 patients who underwent resection, 3 are alive and disease-free, 2 experienced recurrence and are actively receiving systemic treatment, and one died postoperatively due to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Two patients who underwent resection had tumor pathologic complete responses (pCRs) and continue to remain disease-free over 24 months since surgery. Pathologic response correlated with pre-treatment tumor PD-L1 expression, but not tumor mutation burden. Tumor KRAS/STK11 co-mutations were identified in 5 of 9 patients (59%), of whom two with disease progression precluding surgery had tumor KRAS/STK11/KEAP1 co-mutations.ConclusionsThough treatment was feasible, due to toxicity the study arm was terminated early by investigator consensus. In light of this, and while the long-term disease-free status of patients who achieved pCR is encouraging, further investigation of neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with resectable NSCLC requires the identification of predictive biomarkers that enrich for response.

The utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker in patients with advanced cancers receiving immunotherapy is uncertain. We therefore analyzed pretreatment (n = 978) and on-treatment (n = 171) ctDNA samples across 16 advanced-stage tumor types from three phase I/II trials of durvalumab (± the anti-CTLA4 therapy tremelimumab). Higher pretreatment variant allele frequencies (VAF) were associated with poorer overall survival (OS) and other known prognostic factors, but not objective response, suggesting a prognostic role for patient outcomes. On-treatment reductions in VAF and lower on-treatment VAF were independently associated with longer progression-free survival and OS and increased objective response rate, but not prognostic variables, suggesting that on-treatment ctDNA dynamics are predictive of benefit from immune checkpoint blockade. Accordingly, we propose a concept of “molecular response” using ctDNA, incorporating both pretreatment and on-treatment VAF, that predicted long-term survival similarly to initial radiologic response while also permitting early differentiation of responders among patients with initially radiologically stable disease.Significance:In a pan-cancer analysis of immune checkpoint blockade, pretreatment ctDNA levels appeared prognostic and on-treatment dynamics predictive. A “molecular response” metric identified long-term responders and adjudicated benefit among patients with initially radiologically stable disease. Changes in ctDNA may be more dynamic than radiographic changes and could complement existing trial endpoints.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1775

Purpose: Treatment with PD-(L)1 blockade can produce remarkably durable responses in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a significant fraction of long-term responders ultimately progress and predictors of late progression are unknown. We hypothesized that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis of long-term responders to PD-(L)1 blockade may differentiate those who will achieve ongoing benefit from those at risk of eventual progression. Experimental Design: In patients with advanced NSCLC achieving long-term benefit from PD-(L)1 blockade (progression-free survival ≥ 12 months), plasma was collected at a surveillance timepoint late during/after treatment to interrogate ctDNA by Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing. Tumor tissue was available for 24 patients and was profiled by whole-exome sequencing (n = 18) or by targeted sequencing (n = 6). Results: Thirty-one patients with NSCLC with long-term benefit to PD-(L)1 blockade were identified, and ctDNA was analyzed in surveillance blood samples collected at a median of 26.7 months after initiation of therapy. Nine patients also had baseline plasma samples available, and all had detectable ctDNA prior to therapy initiation. At the surveillance timepoint, 27 patients had undetectable ctDNA and 25 (93%) have remained progression-free; in contrast, all 4 patients with detectable ctDNA eventually progressed [Fisher P < 0.0001; positive predictive value = 1, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51–1; negative predictive value = 0.93 (95% CI, 0.80–0.99)]. Conclusions: ctDNA analysis can noninvasively identify minimal residual disease in patients with long-term responses to PD-(L)1 blockade and predict the risk of eventual progression. If validated, ctDNA surveillance may facilitate personalization of the duration of immune checkpoint blockade and enable early intervention in patients at high risk for progression.

BACKGROUND: Liquid biopsy for plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) is commercially available and increasingly adopted in clinical practice despite a paucity of prospective data to support its use. METHODS: Patients with advanced lung cancers who had no known oncogenic driver or developed resistance to current targeted therapy (n = 210) underwent plasma NGS, targeting 21 genes. A subset of patients had concurrent tissue NGS testing using a 468-gene panel (n = 106). Oncogenic driver detection, test turnaround time (TAT), concordance, and treatment response guided by plasma NGS were measured. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Somatic mutations were detected in 64.3% (135/210) of patients. ctDNA detection was lower in patients who were on systemic therapy at the time of plasma collection compared with those who were not (30/70, 42.9% vs 105/140, 75.0%; OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.1 to 0.5, P

Introduction The FIR phase II study (NCT01846416) evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) atezolizumab in advanced NSCLC selected by tumor cell (TC) or tumor-infiltrating immune cell (IC) PD-L1 expression. Methods Patients with PD-L1 TC2/3 (PD-L1 staining on ≥5% of TC) or IC2/3 tumors (PD-L1 staining on ≥5% of IC; determined by SP142 PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay) with paired fresh and archival histology samples were recruited into cohort 1 (chemotherapy-naive/>6 months between adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence), cohort 2 (≥ second-line without brain metastases), or cohort 3 (≥ second-line with treated brain metastases). Patients received 1200 mg atezolizumab on day 1 (21-day cycles). Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, objective response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1). Secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, duration of response, and safety. Results Patients (N = 138) were enrolled (137 evaluable for response: cohort 1, n = 31; cohort 2, n = 93; and cohort 3, n = 13). Investigator-assessed objective response rate was 32%, 21%, and 23% for cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 81%, 67%, and 69% of patients, respectively, including grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events in 16%, 19%, and 15%, respectively. Moreover, 88.6% (86 of 97) paired baseline tumor samples had Conclusions Atezolizumab monotherapy showed clinical activity in patients with NSCLC, including those with brain metastases; safety was consistent with previous trials. Atezolizumab has completed phase III monotherapy studies in second-line. Front-line trials are ongoing, confirming these favorable results.

Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate adverse events (AEs) in patients who received both immune checkpoint inhibitors and thoracic radiation therapy (RT). In particular, we compared the rate of toxicities of concurrent versus sequential delivery of thoracic RT and checkpoint inhibitors. Methods and Materials Patient and treatment characteristics were collected on all patients at our institution who were treated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and/or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors and underwent thoracic RT (n = 79). Receiving both treatments within 1 month was considered concurrent (n = 35; 44%), and any treatment up to 6 months apart was considered sequential (n = 44; 56%). The primary endpoint of this study was the rate of Grade ≥2 AEs from combination therapy (immunotherapy and RT), specifically those that are relevant to thoracic RT: Pneumonitis, other pulmonary events, esophagitis, dermatitis, and fatigue. Further univariate analysis was performed to compare AE rates with clinical and therapy-related variables. Results A total of 79 patients were identified, with lung cancer (n = 45) and melanoma (n = 15) being the most common primary histology. Sixty-two (78%) patients were treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies, 12 (15%) with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, and 5 (6%) received both anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. The median follow-up for survivors was 5.9 months (range, 2.4-55.6 months). Grade ≥2 AEs included pneumonitis (n = 5; 6%), esophagitis (n = 6; 8%), and dermatitis (n = 8; 10%). No statistically significant correlation was found between these AEs when comparing concurrent versus sequential treatment. The only significant variable was a correlation of immunotherapy drug category with Grade ≥2 esophagitis (P = .04). Conclusions Overall, Grade ≥2 AE rates of thoracic RT and immunotherapy appeared as expected and acceptable. The lack of significant differences in AE rates with concurrent versus sequential treatment suggests that even concurrent immunotherapy and thoracic RT may be safe.

Background Antibodies that block programmed death 1 (PD-1) protein improve survival in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but have not been tested in resectable NSCLC, a condition in which little progress has been made during the past decade. Methods In this pilot study, we administered two preoperative doses of PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab in adults with untreated, surgically resectable early (stage I, II, or IIIA) NSCLC. Nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks, with surgery planned approximately 4 weeks after the first dose. The primary end points of the study were safety and feasibility. We also evaluated the tumor pathological response, expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), mutational burden, and mutation-associated, neoantigen-specific T-cell responses. Results Neoadjuvant nivolumab had an acceptable side-effect profile and was not associated with delays in surgery. Of the 21 tumors that were removed...

Purpose Treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is characterized by durable responses and improved survival in a subset of patients. Clinically available tools to optimize use of ICIs and understand the molecular determinants of response are needed. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly routine, but its role in identifying predictors of response to ICIs is not known. Methods Detailed clinical annotation and response data were collected for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer treated with anti–programmed death-1 or anti–programmed death-ligand 1 [anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1] therapy and profiled by targeted NGS (MSK-IMPACT; n = 240). Efficacy was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, and durable clinical benefit (DCB) was defined as partial response/stable disease that lasted > 6 months. Tumor mutation burden (TMB), fraction of copy number–altered genome, and gene alterations were compared among patients with DCB and no durable benefit (NDB). Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed for 49 patients to compare quantification of TMB by targeted NGS versus WES. Results Estimates of TMB by targeted NGS correlated well with WES (ρ = 0.86; P < .001). TMB was greater in patients with DCB than with NDB ( P = .006). DCB was more common, and progression-free survival was longer in patients at increasing thresholds above versus below the 50th percentile of TMB (38.6% v 25.1%; P < .001; hazard ratio, 1.38; P = .024). The fraction of copy number–altered genome was highest in those with NDB. Variants in EGFR and STK11 associated with a lack of benefit. TMB and PD-L1 expression were independent variables, and a composite of TMB plus PD-L1 further enriched for benefit to ICIs. Conclusion Targeted NGS accurately estimates TMB and elevated TMB further improved likelihood of benefit to ICIs. TMB did not correlate with PD-L1 expression; both variables had similar predictive capacity. The incorporation of both TMB and PD-L1 expression into multivariable predictive models should result in greater predictive power.

Surgical resection is the mainstay of therapy for patients with resectable and operable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Surgery alone yields an unacceptably high rate of lung cancer recurrence. The addition of chemotherapy to surgery as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment can improve survival rates by roughly 5% at 5 years. Recently, major advances in cancer immunotherapy have led to better outcomes for many patients with lung cancer. Monoclonal antibodies to programmed death 1 and its ligand are now approved for both first and second line treatment patients with metastatic lung cancer. In this review, we will outline the rationale and current research strategies investigating the role of immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal radiation dose in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not known for patients who receive sequential chemoradiation or definitive radiation only. Our objective was to determine whether there is a benefit to radiation dose escalation for these patients. METHODS: Patients included in our retrospective analysis received radiation treatment for NSCLC between 2004 and 2013, did not have surgery, and received a dose ≥50.0 Grays (Gy). Patients who received concurrent chemoradiation were excluded from the analysis, leaving 336 patients included. The primary outcomes were overall survival, local failure, and distant failure. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age, Karnofsky performance status, gross tumor volume, and treatment modality, patients treated with radiation dose >66 Gy had significantly improved overall survival compared to those treated with 66 Gy had a significantly decreased risk of local failure compared to those treated with 66 Gy versus

Introduction: Durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) has been found to improve outcomes of patients with unresected stage III NSCLC. However, the survival impact of discontinuing durvalumab early owing to adverse events (AEs) remains unknown. Methods: Patients with stage III NSLCC treated with cCRT and greater than or equal to one dose of durvalumab across a multisite cancer center were evaluated. The median durvalumab treatment duration among patients who discontinued owing to AEs (2.1 mo) defined two patient cohorts: early discontinuation (

Purpose The panel updated the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) adjuvant therapy guideline for resected non–small-cell lung cancers. Methods ASCO convened an update panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature, investigating adjuvant therapy in resected non–small-cell lung cancers. Results The updated evidence base covered questions related to adjuvant systemic therapy and included a systematic review conducted by Cancer Care Ontario current to January 2016. A recent American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline and systematic review, previously endorsed by ASCO, was used as the basis for recommendations for adjuvant radiation therapy. An update of these systematic reviews and a search for studies related to radiation therapy found no additional randomized controlled trials. Recommendations Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is recommended for routine use in patients with stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA disease who have undergone complete surgical resections. For individuals with stage IB, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is not recommended for routine use. However, a postoperative multimodality evaluation, including a consultation with a medical oncologist, is recommended to assess benefits and risks of adjuvant chemotherapy for each patient. The guideline provides information on factors other than stage to consider when making a recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy, including tumor size, histopathologic features, and genetic alterations. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended for patients with stage IA disease. Adjuvant radiation therapy is not recommended for patients with resected stage I or II disease. In patients with stage IIIA N2 disease, adjuvant radiation therapy is not recommended for routine use. However, a postoperative multimodality evaluation, including a consultation with a radiation oncologist, is recommended to assess benefits and risks of adjuvant radiation therapy for each patient with N2 disease. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/lung-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .