Search

Myeloproliferative neoplasms research has entered a dynamic and exciting era as we witness exponential growth of novel agents in advanced/early phase clinical trials for myelofibrosis (MF). Building on the success and pivotal role of ruxolitinib, many novel agents, spanning a wide range of mechanisms/targets (epigenetic regulation, apoptotic/intracellular signaling pathways, telomerase, bone marrow fibrosis) are in clinical development; several are studied in registrational trials and hold great potential to expand the therapeutic arsenal/shift the treatment paradigm if regulatory approval is granted. Insight into MF pathogenesis and its molecular underpinnings, preclinical studies demonstrating synergism of ruxolitinib with investigational agents, urgent unmet clinical needs (cytopenias, loss of response to JAK inhibitors); and progressive disease fueled the rapid rise of innovative therapeutics. New strategies include pairing ruxolitinib with erythroid maturation agents to manage anemia (luspatercept), designing rational combinations with ruxolitinib to boost responses in both the frontline and suboptimal response settings (pelabresib, navitoclax, parsaclisib), treatment with non-JAK inhibitor monotherapy in the second-line setting (navtemadlin, imetelstat), novel JAK inhibitors tailored to subgroups with challenging unmet needs (momelotinib and pacritinib for anemia and thrombocytopenia, respectively); and agents potentially enhancing longevity (imetelstat). Beyond typical endpoints evaluated in MF clinical trials (spleen volume reduction ≥ 35%, total symptom score reduction ≥ 50%) thus far, emerging endpoints include overall survival, progression-free survival, transfusion independence, anemia benefits, bone marrow fibrosis and driver mutation allele burden reduction. Novel biomarkers and additional clinical features are being sought to assess new agents and tailor emerging therapies to appropriate patients. New strategies are needed to optimize the design of clinical trials comparing novel combinations to standard agent monotherapy.

In the MYF2001 trial, treatment of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor-relapsed/refractory intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks demonstrated encouraging median overall survival of 29.9 months. To provide historical context, external real-world data (RWD) were collected from a study of 96 patients who had discontinued ruxolitinib and were subsequently treated with best available therapy (BAT) at Moffitt Cancer Center. A closely matched cohort was identified using the MYF2001 eligibility criteria, including patients with MF who had discontinued ruxolitinib due to lack or loss of response. Overall survival was measured from time of JAK inhibitor discontinuation to death or censored at last follow-up. To improve comparability, propensity score weighting approaches using average treatment effect for overlap population (ATO) and stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) were used for 10 critical baseline covariates. Fifty-seven patients treated with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg from MYF2001 and 38 patients treated with BAT from RWD were analyzed with improved balanced baseline covariates after propensity score adjustment, showing significantly lower risk of death with imetelstat compared with BAT (hazard ratio: 0.35; p = 0.0019). With sIPTW, results were similar. Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis. In conclusion, treatment with imetelstat was associated with longer overall survival compared to BAT (30 vs 12 months, respectively) in closely matched patients with MF after JAK inhibitor failure, warranting further evaluation of imetelstat in this poor-prognosis patient population.

International audience

Hyperactive signaling of the Janus-Associated Kinase/Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway is central to the pathogenesis of Philadelphia-chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), i.e., polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) which are characterized by inherent biological and clinical heterogeneity. Patients with MPNs suffer from substantial symptom burden and curtailed longevity due to thrombohemorrhagic complications or progression to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia. Therefore, the management strategies focus on thrombosis risk mitigation in PV/ET, alleviation of symptom burden and improvement in cytopenias and red blood cell transfusion requirements, and disease course alteration in PMF. The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (USFDA) approval of two JAK inhibitors (ruxolitinib, fedratinib) has transformed the therapeutic landscape of MPNs in assuaging the need for frequent therapeutic phlebotomy (PV) and reduction in spleen and symptom burden (PV and PMF). Despite improving biological understanding of these complex clonal hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell neoplasms, none of the currently available therapies appear to modify the proclivity of the disease per se, thereby remaining an urgent unmet clinical need and an ongoing area of intense clinical investigation. This review will highlight the evolving targeted therapeutic agents that are in early- and late-stage MPN clinical development.

Imetelstat is a specific and competitive inhibitor of telomerase enzymatic activity. We demonstrated that imetelstat could interfere with the DNA repair process and enhance the effect of DNA damaging agents using hematological tumor cell lines. Short-term administration of imetelstat enhanced growth suppression by anticancer agents and radiation. It also upregulated γH2AX expression induced by irradiation. Immunofluorescence staining showed that both human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and γH2AX were upregulated and co-localized in the nucleus of peripheral blood mononuclear cells after irradiation, suggesting that hTERT was involved in the DNA-DSB repair process. Imetelstat enhanced growth inhibitory effect of cytotoxic agents in short-term culture without shortening of telomeres, indicating that this effect was attributed by telomere length independent mechanism. Our results suggest that the combination of short-term treatment with imetelstat and cytotoxic agent is a promising strategy to treat a wide variety of hematopoietic malignancies.

Purpose of review: Estimating and modifying thrombotic risk is currently the mainstay of care for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). In recent years, however, increased attention has shifted towards quality of life and disease modification. In this review, we discuss recent advances in risk stratification, present updated results for ruxolitinib and interferon randomized clinical trials, discuss new approaches in antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment, and summarize early phase trials of novel agents and emerging therapeutic concepts for the treatment of PV and ET. Recent findings: International collaborations and novel technologies, i.e., next-generation sequencing and machine learning techniques, have demonstrated excellent abilities to improve thrombotic risk stratification in PV and ET. Updated results from ruxolitinib and interferon randomized clinical trials have confirmed excellent efficacy and safety of these agents, both as first- and second- line treatments. Early trials of novel agents (histone deacetylase inhibitors, telomerase inhibitors, lysine-specific demethylase-1 inhibitors, human double-minute 2 inhibitors, and hepcidin mimetics) have shown encouraging efficacy and safety in blood count control, reduction of splenomegaly, and alleviation of disease-related symptoms. Finally, accumulating evidence suggested that direct oral anticoagulants may be a valid therapeutic alternative to warfarin for prolonged thromboprophylaxis. Summary: International collaborations ("big data") with the help of new technologies represent an exciting new approach to analyze rare outcomes in rare diseases, especially for identifying novel prognostic biomarkers in PV and ET. Randomized clinical trials are also needed to fully elucidate whether novel agents may establish new standards of care.

Purpose of review In this review, the focus is on the most recent improvements in diagnosis, prognostication and therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and on their relevance for clinical management. Recent findings Analytical methods to refine cytogenetic and molecular assessment of MDS have been proposed, improving prognostic stratification obtained from integration of clinical and genomic data. Novel agents with very different mode of action, as single drugs or added to HMA backbone, show promising clinical results in LR-MDS and HR-MDS. Luspatercept has obtained approval given the fact that in transfusion-dependent erythropoietic-stimulating agent resistant/relapsed LR-MDS induced nearly 50% of transfusion independence. Another investigational agent showing efficacy and possibly disease modifying activity in the same setting is the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat. Results from phase II study with azacytidine and pevonedistat indicate the concrete possibility to enhance durable responses compared with azacitidine single drug. In the same direction are the preliminary results of other agents with different mode of action: magrolimab, venetoclax, sabatolimab, as well as the targeted therapy with enasidenib and ivosidenib. New posttransplant maintenance strategies may concur to prolong response. Summary Better diagnosis and prognostic stratification may allow a more precise and personalized treatment of MDS with novel agent combinations leading to improved therapeutic algorithms.

PURPOSE Patients with myelofibrosis who are relapsed or refractory (R/R) to Janus-associated kinase inhibitors (JAKis) have poor clinical outcomes including dismal overall survival (OS) that ranges between 13 and 16 months. Imetelstat, a telomerase inhibitor, was evaluated in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis R/R to JAKi in a phase II multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02426086 ). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive either imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg or 4.7 mg/kg intravenous once every 3 weeks. Spleen response (≥ 35% spleen volume reduction) and symptom response (≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score) rates at week 24 were coprimary end points. Secondary end points included OS and safety. RESULTS Study enrollment was closed early, and patients treated with 4.7 mg/kg were permitted to continue treatment with 9.4 mg/kg. At week 24, spleen and symptom response rates were 10.2% and 32.2% in the 9.4-mg/kg arm and 0% and 6.3% in the 4.7-mg/kg arm. Treatment with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg led to a median OS of 29.9 months and bone marrow fibrosis improvement in 40.5% and variant allele frequency reduction of driver mutations in 42.1% of evaluable patients. Fibrosis improvement and variant allele frequency reduction correlated with OS. Target inhibition was demonstrated by reduction of telomerase activity and human telomerase reverse transcriptase level and correlated with spleen response, symptom response, and OS. Most common adverse events on both arms were grade 3 or 4 reversible cytopenias. CONCLUSION In this phase II study of two imetelstat doses, 9.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks demonstrated clinical benefits in symptom response rate, with an acceptable safety profile for this poor-risk JAKi R/R population. Biomarker and bone marrow fibrosis assessments suggested selective effects on the malignant clone. A confirmatory phase III study is currently underway.

Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, bone marrow fibrosis, and a propensity towards transformation to acute leukemia. JAK inhibitors are the only approved therapy for myelofibrosis and have been successful in reducing spleen and symptom burden. However, they do not significantly impact disease progression and many patients are ineligible due to coexisting cytopenias. Patients who are refractory to JAK inhibition also have a dismal survival. Therefore, non-JAK inhibitor-based therapies are being explored in pre-clinical and clinical settings. In this review, we discuss novel treatments in development for myelofibrosis with targets outside of the JAK-STAT pathway. We focus on the mechanism, preclinical rationale, and available clinical efficacy and safety information of relevant agents including those that target apoptosis (navitoclax, KRT-232, LCL-161, imetelstat), epigenetic modulation (CPI-0610, bomedemstat), the bone marrow microenvironment (PRM-151, AVID-200, alisertib), signal transduction pathways (parsaclisib), and miscellaneous agents (tagraxofusp. luspatercept). We also provide commentary on the future of therapeutic development in myelofibrosis.

PURPOSE Patients with lower-risk (LR) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who are RBC transfusion dependent and have experienced relapse after or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) have limited treatment options. High telomerase activity and human telomerase reverse-transcription expression in clonal hematopoietic cells have been reported in patients with MDS. Imetelstat, a first-in-class competitive inhibitor of telomerase enzymatic activity, targets cells with active telomerase. We report efficacy, safety, and biomarker data for patients with LR MDS who are RBC transfusion dependent and who were relapsed/refractory to ESAs. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this two-part phase II/III study (MDS3001), the primary end point was 8-week RBC transfusion independence (TI) rate, with key secondary end points of 24-week RBC TI rate, TI duration, and hematologic improvement-erythroid. RESULTS Data from the phase II part of the study are reported. Of 57 patients enrolled and treated (overall population), 38 were non-del(5q) and hypomethylating agent and lenalidomide naïve (subset population). The 8- and 24-week RBC TI rates in the overall population were 37% and 23%, respectively, with a median TI duration of 65 weeks. In the subset population, 8- and 24-week RBC TI rates were 42% and 29%, respectively, with a median TI duration of 86 weeks. Eight-week TI rate was observed across all subgroups evaluated. Cytogenetic and mutational data revealed a reduction of the malignant clones, suggesting disease modification activity. The most common adverse events were cytopenias, typically reversible within 4 weeks. CONCLUSION Imetelstat treatment results in a meaningful, durable TI rate across a broad range of heavily transfused patients with LR MDS who are ineligible for or relapsed/refractory to ESAs. Biomarker analyses indicated effects on the mutant malignant clone.

Simple Summary Myelofibrosis (MF) is an advanced form of a group of rare, related bone marrow cancers termed myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Some patients develop myelofibrosis from the outset, while in others, it occurs as a complication of the more indolent MPNs, polycythemia vera (PV) or essential thrombocythemia (ET). Patients with PV or ET who require drug treatment are typically treated with the chemotherapy drug hydroxyurea, while in MF, the targeted therapies termed Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors form the mainstay of treatment. However, these and other drugs (e.g., interferons) have important limitations. No drug has been shown to reliably prevent the progression of PV or ET to MF or transformation of MPNs to acute myeloid leukemia. In PV, it is not conclusively known if JAK inhibitors reduce the risk of blood clots, and in MF, these drugs do not improve low blood counts. New approaches to treating MF and related MPNs are, therefore, necessary. Abstract Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition forms the cornerstone of the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), and the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib is often used as a second-line agent in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who fail hydroxyurea (HU). In addition, ruxolitinib continues to be studied in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET). The benefits of JAK inhibition in terms of splenomegaly and symptoms in patients with MF are undeniable, and ruxolitinib prolongs the survival of persons with higher risk MF. Despite this, however, “disease-modifying” effects of JAK inhibitors in MF, i.e., bone marrow fibrosis and mutant allele burden reduction, are limited. Similarly, in HU-resistant/intolerant PV, while ruxolitinib provides excellent control of the hematocrit, symptoms and splenomegaly, reduction in the rate of thromboembolic events has not been convincingly demonstrated. Furthermore, JAK inhibitors do not prevent disease evolution to MF or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Frontline cytoreductive therapy for PV generally comprises HU and interferons, which have their own limitations. Numerous novel agents, representing diverse mechanisms of action, are in development for the treatment of these three classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). JAK inhibitor-based combinations, all of which are currently under study for MF, have been covered elsewhere in this issue. In this article, we focus on agents that have been studied as monotherapy in patients with MF, generally after JAK inhibitor resistance/intolerance, as well as several novel compounds in development for PV/ET.

Despite the dramatic progress made in the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis since the introduction of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, a therapeutic option that can modify the natural history of the disease and prevent evolution to blast-phase is still lacking. Recent investigational treatments including immunomodulatory drugs and histone deacetylase inhibitors benefit some patients but these effects have proven modest at best. Several novel agents do show promising activity in preclinical studies and early-phase clinical trials. We will illustrate a snapshot view of where the management of myelofibrosis is evolving, in an era of personalized medicine and advanced molecular diagnostics. Areas covered: A literature search using MEDLINE and recent meeting abstracts was performed using the keywords below. It focused on therapies in active phases of development based on their scientific and preclinical rationale with the intent to highlight agents that have novel biological effects. Expert commentary: The most mature advances in treatment of myelofibrosis are the development of second-generation JAK1/2 inhibitors and improvements in expanding access to donors for transplantation. In addition, there are efforts to identify drugs that target pathways other than JAK/STAT signaling that might improve the survival of myelofibrosis patients, and limit the need for stem-cell transplantation.

Background Telomerase activity is required for both initiation and maintenance of tumorigenesis and over 90% cancers overexpress telomerase. Therefore, telomerase targeting has emerged as a potential strategy for cancer treatment. In agreement with this, several telomerase inhibitors are being tested for cancer treatment and have shown some promise. However, because of the variability in response between the cancer patients, it is important to identify biomarkers that allow for distinguishing cancers that are responsive to telomerase inhibition from the cancers that are not. Therefore, in this study we performed experiments to identify a biomarker that can be used to predict telomerase inhibition induced tumor growth inhibition. Methods In our study, we have performed transcriptome-wide gene expression analysis on multiple ovarian and colon cancer cell lines that were treated with telomerase inhibitor imetelstat and were responsive to telomerase inhibition-induced tumor growth attenuation. Results We demonstrate that telomerase inhibition by telomerase inhibitor imetelstat results in decreased expression of interleukin 8 (IL8) in all telomerase responsive cancer cell lines. This phenomenon is of general occurrence because we find that multiple ovarian and colon cell lines show decrease in IL8 mRNA and protein levels after telomerase inhibition. Additionally, we find loss of IL8 phenocopy Telomerase inhibition mediated growth inhibitory effect in cancer cells. Conclusion Taken together, our results show that IL8 is a biomarker that predict telomerase inhibition mediated growth attenuation of cancer cells and its loss phenocopy telomerase inhibition. Therefore, IL8 expression can be utilized as a biomarker for telomerase targeted cancer therapies to potentially predict therapeutic response. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4633-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction: Imetelstat is a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor that targets cells with high telomerase activity and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) expression, characteristics observed in MDS patients (pts) across all disease stages. IMerge (MDS3001, NCT02598661) is a Phase 2/3 global study of imetelstat for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent (TD) pts with non-del 5q LR-MDS ESA-R/R, who have limited treatment options. The results from the Phase 2 part indicated that imetelstat achieved durable transfusion independence (TI) with a manageable safety profile. Among 38 pts with median follow-up of 24 months, ≥8-week (w), ≥24-w, ≥1-year (y) TI rates were 42%, 32% and 29%, respectively (Steensma JCO 2020, Platzbecker ASH 2020). Aims: To assess the correlation between imetelstat's on-target activity with clinical benefits and safety data as of 10-May 2021 in the Phase 2 part of IMerge. Methods: Peripheral blood samples pre and after 1 and 2 cycles of imetelstat administration were collected to analyze hTERT level by Taqman RT-PCR assay. ≥50% hTERT reduction by imetelstat was considered optimal pharmacodynamic (PD) effect. Correlation analyses between the optimal PD and efficacy, including TI rates ≥8-w, ≥24-w, and ≥1-y, duration of the longest TI, and OS, as well as hematological and liver function lab parameters were performed. Results: hTERT analyses on 35/38 pts with matched pre- and post-1 to 2 cycles of treatment samples available demonstrated on-target activity/optimal PD effect of imetelstat in 54.3% (19/35) of pts. Pts who achieved optimal PD had significantly higher rates of TI compared to pts who did not achieve optimal PD: 63.2% (12/19) vs 25% (4/16) had ≥8-w TI (p=0.0411); 57.9% (11/19) vs 12.5% (2/16) had ≥24-w TI (p=0.0125); and 52.6% (10/19) vs 6.3% (1/16) had ≥1-y TI (p=0.0125) (Fig A). Pts who achieved optimal PD effect had a greater reduction in transfusions (both absolute change in transfusion units and % of change in transfusion burden) in the best 8-week interval compared to pts who did not. In addition, pts who achieved optimal PD had a significantly longer median TI duration (68.4 w, 95% CI 4.9, 92.4) compared to those who did not (5.5 w, 95% CI 2.3, 6.6) with a hazard ratio of 0.364 (95% CI 0.167, 0.794, log-rank p value=0.0087, Fig B). Furthermore, median OS was 57.0 months (95% CI 34.6, -) in pts who achieved optimal PD vs 40.7 months (95% CI 26.9, -) in pts who did not, and the 4-year OS rate was 58.4% vs 31.0%, respectively, although not statistically significant. Pts who achieved optimal PD also had lower rates of Grade 3+neutropenia (52.6%), thrombocytopenia (57.9%), or liver function elevations (5.3%) compared to pts who did not achieve optimal PD (68.8%, 68.8% and 18.8%, respectively), although the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Optimal PD effect of imetelstat treatment was demonstrated by ≥50% hTERT reduction. A significant correlation was observed between optimal PD effect of imetelstat and durable TI and improved 4-year OS rate, effectively linking imetelstat activity to clinical efficacy. Additionally, pts who achieved an optimal PD effect by imetelstat treatment did not have higher rates of cytopenias or liver enzyme elevations compared to pts without optimal PD effect. Enrollment is ongoing for the Phase 3 part of IMerge, a randomized (2:1) double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare efficacy of imetelstat vs. placebo. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Santini: Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Fenaux: JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Raza: Celgene Inc: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Genoptix: Speakers Bureau; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Janssen R&D: Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Onconova Therapeutics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Germing: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: advisory activity, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Font: CELGENE-BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses; GILEAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Other: Travel, accomodations, expenses. Diez-Campelo: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Patnaik: Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stemline Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sherman: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Berry: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Feller: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dougherty: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sun: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wan: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rizo: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Huang: Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Platzbecker: Takeda: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Imetelstat, a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor, is under clinical development but not approved for treatment of MDS

Background: In cancer evolution, development of telomere maintenance mechanisms represents a critical feature to achieve replicative immortality and prevent cell death after shortening below a critical threshold. Several studies have indicated that excessive telomere shortening or aberrant telomeric repeats are present in cancer genomes, however, their precise role in myeloid malignancies remains largely unexplored. We stipulated that immature leukemia-initiating cells (LIC) would display higher telomerase activity and thus longer telomeres while in mature LIC lower telomerase activity would be associated with shorter telomeres due to excessive division rate. Additional lesions may also lead to disturbed differentiation programs resulting in altered expression of telomerase. Taking advantage of a vast cohort (N=1648) of patients with myeloid neoplasia analyzed by whole genome sequencing (WGS, mean. coverage 100x) we determined telomere length (TL). Aim: We set out to hypothesize that WGS data can be used to reliably measure the TL and that if systematically applied to well defined patient cohorts, we could test whether preservation of TL or its excessive shortening are prognostically or biologically relevant to clinical outcome. Methods: Our cohort included patients with AML (N=732), MDS (N=701) and MPN (N=102 incl. CML, ET, PMF, PV). Healthy subjects (N=11) and patients with the clonal non-malignant HSC disorder PNH (N=102) served as controls. To retrieve TL and telomere repeat heterogeneity via singleton analysis from WGS data we used two independent bioinformatic tools TelomereHunter and Telseq (1A). Results: First, using bidirectional cross-confirmation with independent bioinformatics pipelines, reliability of WGS-based TL measurements (1B) was confirmed and, as anticipated, age-dependency of TL in healthy controls was reproduced (1C). Next we investigated age as a possible confounder of TL shortening in patients. While in PNH age had an expected impact, patients with AML or MDS exhibited TL decoupled from its inherent age-dependence (r=.00034, P=.72). In general, we noted TL shortening as an overarching feature of myeloid proliferation irrespective of entity (1D). Furthermore, mutations in the promotor region of TERT were not correlated with TL. In AML or MDS, neither morphological nor genetic subclassification where associated with differences in TL (1E), with the exception of a small subset of AML and MDS patients (n=103, n=97), harboring abnormally long telomeres compared to healthy subjects. These were significantly associated with mutations in TP53 (AML P=1.91x10-6, mean TL 558.4; MDS P=.55x10-7, mean TL 414.5) but not with any other common mutation. This is surprising, since TP53 mutations are thought to protect cells from telomeric catastrophe following excessive shortening. Moreover, comparing the VAF of TP53mut AML samples with the corresponding measured TL, revealed a positive correlation (r=.2281, P=.021), irrespective of the blast count by cytomorphology (1F). Singleton analysis from all 1648 patients revealed that in AML and MDS patients, alternative telomere repeat- variants (chiefly TTTGGG) were increased pointing towards a possible implication of alternative telomere extension (1G). Lastly, outcome analysis revealed that in AML, the presence of longer telomeres (compared to controls) was associated with worse prognosis (P=.0035) (1H). Multivariate analysis, which included age, karyotype, TP53 status and gender, revealed that this was due to the strong association with TP53 mutations (n=630 vs n=103). The implications of our study extend beyond the realm of telomere biology and leukemia pathophysiology. Therapies targeting the telomere machinery, e.g. imetelstat, may offer an opportunity for application beyond MPN, its current indication. Ongoing studies are currently investigating its use in MDS. Based on our findings we argue that treatment may be rationally evaluated in TP53mut AML. Conclusion: Our findings provide a rationale for (1) the use of WGS to investigate TL, (2) the fundamental discovery that TL shortening is a common principle in myeloid neoplasms, (3) TP53 mutations being accompanied with increased TL and (4) the exploitation of TL to identify subgroups eligible for treatment with imetelstat. Moreover, WGS-based TL analysis in leukemias can contribute to our understanding of TL maintenance mechanisms in leukemic genome. Disclosures Maciejewski: Novartis, Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion, BMS: Speakers Bureau.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis with varying degrees of dysplasia and peripheral cytopenias. MDS are driven by structural chromosomal alterations and somatic mutations in neoplastic myeloid cells, which are supported by a tumorigenic and a proinflammatory marrow microenvironment. Current treatment strategies for lower-risk MDS focus on improving quality of life and cytopenias, while prolonging survival and delaying disease progression is the focus for higher-risk MDS. Several promising drugs are in the horizon, including the hypoxia-inducible factor stabilizer roxadustat, telomerase inhibitor imetelstat, oral hypomethylating agents (CC-486), TP53 modulators (APR-246 and ALRN-6924), and the anti-CD47 antibody magrolimab. Targeted therapies approved for acute myeloid leukemia treatment, such as isocitrate dehdyrogenase inhibitors and venetoclax, are also being studied for use in MDS. In this review, we provide a brief overview of pathogenesis and current treatment strategies in MDS followed by a discussion of newer agents that are under clinical investigation.

TPS7056 Background: Current treatment options for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent (TD) patients (pts) with lower risk (LR) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) relapsed after or refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have limited efficacy and durability; new approaches are needed. Imetelstat is a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor that targets cells with short telomeres and active telomerase, characteristics observed in MDS pts across all disease stages. IMerge (MDS3001) is a Phase 2/3 global study of imetelstat for TD pts with non-del(5q) LR MDS post ESA therapy. The results from Phase 2 part indicated that imetelstat achieved durable RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) and the most frequently reported adverse events were manageable and reversible grade ≥3 cytopenias. Among 38 pts with median follow-up of 24 months, 8-week, 24-week and 1-year TI rates were 42%, 32% and 29%, respectively; these responses were seen across different LR MDS subtypes. Median TI duration was 20 months and the longest TI was 2.7 years. A high and durable hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) rate of 68% for a median duration of 21 months were also achieved. Reduction of variant allele frequency of mutations by imetelstat treatment was observed in some pts and correlated with clinical benefits (Platzbecker et al EHA 2020; Steensma et al JCO 2020). These results support the Phase 3 part of the trial. Methods: IMerge is two-part, Phase 2/3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02598661). The Phase 3 part of the study is open for enrollment to adult pts with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low or intermediate-1 risk, non-del(5q) MDS who are TD, are relapsed after or refractory to ESAs, and have not received treatment with lenalidomide or hypomethylating agents. The study is a randomized (2:1) double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare efficacy of imetelstat vs placebo that will enroll approximately 170 pts and will be conducted at approximately 120 centers in North America, Europe, Asia and Middle East. Imetelstat is administered as 2-hour IV infusion every 4 weeks at 7.5 mg/kg. The primary endpoint of the study is to assess the rate of RBC-TI lasting ≥8 weeks. Secondary endpoints include safety, rate of RBC-TI ≥24 weeks, time to RBC-TI start, RBC-TI duration, rate of HI-E, the amount and relative change in RBC transfusions, rate of CR or PR, overall survival, progression of MDS, pharmacokinetics, and quality of life. Biomarkers relevant to the mechanism of action of imetelstat will be assessed to demonstrate target inhibition and their association with clinical responses. Cytogenetics and mutation analyses will be performed to evaluate the impact of imetelstat on reduction/depletion of malignant clones leading to disease modification. The study is currently recruiting pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02598661.

Imetelstat (GRN163L) is a potent and selective inhibitor of telomerase. We have previously reported that GRN163L could shorten telomeres and limit the lifespan of CD18/HPAF and CAPAN1 pancreatic cancer cells. Here, we examined the effects of GRN163L on two other pancreatic cancer cell lines: AsPC1 and L3.6pl. In both lines, chronic exposure to GRN163L led to an initial shortening of telomeres followed by a stabilization of extremely short telomeres. In AsPC1 cells, telomere attrition eventually led to the induction of crisis and the loss of the treated population. In L3.6pl cells, crisis was transient and followed by the emergence of GRN163L-resistant cells, which could grow at increasing concentrations of GRN163L. The Shelterin complex is a telomere-associated complex that limits the access of telomerase to telomeres. The telomerase inhibitory function of this complex can be enhanced by drugs that block the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of its TRF1 and/or TRF2 subunits. Combined treatment of the GRN163L-resistant L3.6pl cells with GRN163L and 3-aminobenzamide (3AB), a general inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases, led to additional telomere shortening and limited the lifespan of the resistant cells. Results from this work suggest that inhibitors of telomerase and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases can cooperate to limit the lifespan of pancreatic cancer cells.

The unprecedented success of the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis provided much-needed impetus for clinical drug development for the Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). The survival benefit conferred by this agent, along with its marked efficacy with regard to spleen volume and symptom reduction, have made ruxolitinib the cornerstone of drug therapy in myelofibrosis. However, there remain significant unmet needs in the treatment of patients with MF, and many novel classes of agents continue to be investigated in efforts to build upon the progress made with ruxolitinib. These include inhibitors of histone deacetylases (HDACs) and DNA methyltransferases, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase isoforms, heat shock protein 90, cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6, and Hedgehog signaling, among others. In parallel, other JAK inhibitors with potential for less myelosuppression or even improvement of anemia, greater selectivity for JAK1 or JAK2, and the ability to overcome JAK inhibitor “persistence” are in various stages of development. First-in-class agents such as the activin receptor IIA ligand trap sotatercept (for anemia of myelofibrosis), the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat, and the anti-fibrotic agent PRM-151 (recombinant human pentraxin-2) are also in clinical trials. In polycythemia vera, a novel interferon administered every 2 weeks is being developed for frontline therapy in high-risk individuals, and inhibitors of human double minute 2 (HDM2) have shown promise in preclinical studies, as have HDAC inhibitors, e.g., givinostat (both in the laboratory and in the clinic). Ruxolitinib is approved for second-line therapy of polycythemia vera, and is being developed for essential thrombocythemia.

Introduction: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with peripheral blood cytopenias, marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly systemic symptoms and evolution to a refractory form of acute myeloid leukemia. Treatment with a JAK1/2 inhibitor significantly improves the symptom burden and reduces the degree of splenomegaly. JAK1/2 therapy, however, results in a modest prolongation of survival, but does not halt disease progression or reduce the risk of leukemic transformation. Novel agents with the potential to alter the progressive disease course of MF are urgently needed.Areas covered: The pre-clinical rationale for the use of the telomerase inhibitor, imetelstat, in patients with advanced MF and essential thrombocythemia (ET) will be reviewed as well the results of the initial clinical trials with this agent.Expert opinion: Results from a single institution pilot study of imetelstat therapy have been reported and indicate a signal of activity. This approach appears to have the potent...

During the last decade, substantial advances have been made in the understanding of the complex molecular, immunological and cellular disturbances involved in the initiation as well as evolution of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In 85% of the mainly frail and older patient population, anemia is present at the time of diagnosis and is thus a major therapeutic challenge. High rates of primary resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), the currently only approved standard therapy to treat anemia in lower-risk MDS, demand the development of novel and efficient drugs with a good safety profile. Luspatercept, a ligand trap of activin receptor II, is able to promote late stage erythropoiesis even in patients failing prior ESA treatment. The presence of ring sideroblastic phenotype defines a subgroup of patients with higher response rates. Additionally, recent developments in clinical research using HIF-1 or telomerase modulation by roxadustat or imetelstat are promising. Other areas of translational research involve targeting the inflammasome by anti-inflammatory drugs in order to improve anemia. These efforts will hopefully pave the way for new targeted treatment options for anemic low-risk MDS patients.

Introduction The Janus kinase (JAK)1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib provides rapid, sustained and often dramatic benefits to patients with myelofibrosis, inducing spleen shrinkage and ameliorating symptoms, and improves survival. However, the drug has little effect on the underlying bone marrow fibrosis or on mutant allele burden, and clinical resistance eventually develops. Furthermore, ruxolitinib-induced cytopenias can be challenging in everyday practice. Areas covered The developmental therapeutics landscape in MF is discussed. This includes potential partners for ruxolitinib being developed with an aim to improve cytopenias, or to enhance its disease-modifying effects. The development of other JAK inhibitors with efficacy post-ruxolitinib or other unique attributes is being pursued in earnest. Agents with novel mechanisms of action are being studied in patients whose disease responds sub-optimally to, is refractory to or progresses after ruxolitinib. Expert opinion The JAK inhibitors fedratinib, pacritinib and momelotinib are clearly active, and it is expected that one or more of these will become licensed in the future. The activin receptor ligand traps are promising as treatments for anemia. Imetelstat has shown interesting activity post-ruxolitinib, and azactidine may be a useful partner for ruxolitinib in some patients. Appropriately, multiple pre-clinical and clinical leads are being pursued in this difficult therapeutic area.

Background: Current treatment options for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent (TD) patients with lower risk (LR) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) relapsed after or refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have limited efficacy and durability; new approaches are needed. Imetelstat is a 13-mer lipid-conjugated oligonucleotide that targets the RNA template of human telomerase and is a competitive inhibitor of telomerase enzymatic activity (Asai et al, Cancer Res 2003; Herbert et al, Oncogene 2005). Preclinical, in vivo xenograft models (Dikmen et al, Cancer Res 2005; Hochreiter et al, Clin Cancer Res 2006) and preliminary clinical data from a pilot study (Tefferi et al, Blood Cancer J 2016) supported initiation of a study in TD LR MDS patients. The Phase 2 part of IMerge demonstrated an 8-week RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) rate of 42%, 24-week RBC-TI rate of 32%, with median duration of TI being 88 weeks. The responses were seen across different subtypes of LR MDS (Platzbecker et al, EHA 2020, S183). No new safety signal was identified. These results support the Phase 3 part of the trial. Methods: IMerge is two-part, Phase 2/3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02598661). The Phase 2 portion of the study described above is closed for enrolment. The Phase 3 portion of the study is open for enrollment of adult patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low or intermediate-1 risk, non-del(5q) MDS, who are TD, are relapsed after or refractory to ESAs, and have not received treatment with lenalidomide or hypomethylating agents. The study is a randomized (2:1) double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare efficacy of imetelstat vs. placebo that will enroll approximately 170 patients and will be conducted at approximately 130 centers in North America, Europe, Asia and Middle East. Imetelstat will be administered as 2-hour IV infusion every 4 weeks at 7.5 mg/kg. The primary endpoint of the study is to assess the rate of RBC-TI lasting ≥8 weeks. Secondary endpoints include safety, rate of RBC-TI ≥24 weeks, time to RBC-TI start, RBC-TI duration, rate of hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E), the amount and relative change in RBC transfusions, rate of complete response or partial response, overall survival, progression of MDS, pharmacokinetics, and effect of treatment on quality of life. Biomarkers relevant to the mechanism of action of imetelstat will be assessed to demonstrate target inhibition and their association with clinical responses. Cytogenetics and mutation analyses will be performed to evaluate the impact of imetelstat on reduction/depletion of malignant clones leading to disease modification. Disclosures Platzbecker: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fenaux:Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding. Steensma:CRISPR: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Aprea Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy; Arena: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; H3 Biosciences: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka: Consultancy; Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Font:Abbvie: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Diez-Campelo:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Thepot:astellas: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; sanofi: Honoraria; celgene: Honoraria. Jang:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sherman:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dougherty:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sun:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Huang:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wan:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rizo:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Berry:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Feller:Geron Corp: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Santini:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acceleron: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Menarini: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria.

Telomerase activation is critical in many cancers including central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Imetelstat is an oligonucleotide that binds to the template region of the RNA component of telomerase, inhibiting its enzymatic activity. We conducted an investigator-sponsored molecular biology (MB) and phase II study to estimate inhibition of tumor telomerase activity and sustained responses by imetelstat in children with recurrent CNS malignancies. In the MB study, patients with recurrent medulloblastoma, high-grade glioma (HGG) or ependymoma undergoing resection received one dose of imetelstat as a 2-h intravenous infusion at 285 mg/m(2), 12-24 h before surgery. Telomerase activity was evaluated in fresh tumor from surgery. Post-surgery and in the phase II study, patients received imetelstat IV (days 1 and 8 q21-days) at 285 mg/m(2). Imetelstat pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed. Of two evaluable patients on the MB trial, intratumoral telomerase activity was inhibited by 95 % compared to baseline archival tissue in one patient and was inevaluable in one patient. Forty-two patients (40 evaluable for toxicity) were enrolled: 9 medulloblastomas, 18 HGG, 4 ependymomas, 9 diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Most common grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (32.5 %), lymphopenia (17.5 %), neutropenia (12.5 %), ALT (7.5 %) and AST (5 %) elevation. Two patients died of intratumoral hemorrhage secondary to thrombocytopenia leading to premature study closure. No objective responses were observed. Telomerase inhibition was observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for at least 8 days. Imetelstat demonstrated intratumoral and PBMC target inhibition; the regimen proved too toxic in children with recurrent CNS tumors.

Introduction: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) including blast crisis (BC) CML and myelofibrosis (MF) are characterized by the clonal proliferation of hematopoietic cell lineages, mostly in the marrow. BC CML gives rise to TKI resistant myeloid progenitors that activate Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. However, BCR-ABL TKI resistant BC CML exhibits a robust telomerase activity and presents at very low or undetectable level in normal cells, and telomerase plays a pivotal role in cancer cell growth and may serve as an ideal target for anticancer therapeutics. In addition, β-catenin had been reported to transcriptionally regulate human telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT). Telomerase is composed of the enzymatic reverse transcriptase protein TERT and the RNA template TERC. Thus, we investigated the capacity of imetelstat, a telomerase inhibitor, which binds to the TERC subunit with high affinity to prevent self-renewal of malignant progenitors. Recent clinical trials showed early signs of efficacy in MF. But, it's role in selectively inhibiting leukemia stem cell (LSC) self-renewing in CML has not been elucidated. Methods and Results: Progenitors from BC CML were compared with chronic phase (CP) CML and primary normal samples, RNA-seq results revealed upregulation of TERT suggesting a role for TERT activation in BC CML progenitor transformation. Human MPN progenitor co-culture experiments revealed that combined treatment with dasatinib at 1 nM, and imetelstat at 1 or 5 uM significantly inhibited (p < 0.001, ANOVA) in vitro replating of BC CML compared with aged bone marrow progenitors. Also, imetelstat (5 mM) significantly reduced replating of MF compared with normal progenitor samples. Treatment of humanized MPN mouse models, established with 5 different BC CML and 4 different MF samples, at 30 mg/kg of imetelstat, three times a week for 4 weeks resulted in a significant reduction of malignant progenitors and human CD45+ cells (p < 0.001, t test) in BC CML, and a significant reduction of human CD45+ cells (p Conclusions: Niche responsive interactions between the telomerase complex and the Wnt/β-catenin self-renewal pathway sensitize β-catenin activated MPN progenitors to imetelstat treatment in both the in vitro co-culture and in vivo humanized MPN mouse models thereby providing a strong rationale for studies assessing eradication of malignant progenitors using imetelstat. Citation Format: Wenxue Ma, Larisa Balaian, Cayla Mason, Raymond Diep, Jessica Pham, Qingfei Jiang, Jeremy Lee, Sheldon Morris, Phoebe Mondala, Ping Chen, Thomas Whisenant, Mary Donohoe, Benjamin Heyman, Edward Ball, Fei Huang, Catriona Jamieson. Imetelstat inhibits RNA-editing mediated myeloproliferative neoplasm stem cell self-renewal [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3792.

Telomere maintenance mechanisms (i.e., telomerase activity (TA) and the alternative lengthening of telomere (ALT) mechanism) contribute to tumorigenesis by providing unlimited proliferative capacity to cancer cells. Although the role of either telomere maintenance mechanisms seems to be equivalent in providing a limitless proliferative ability to tumor cells, the contribution of TA and ALT to the clinical outcome of patients may differ prominently. In addition, several strategies have been developed to interfere with TA in cancer, including Imetelstat that has been the first telomerase inhibitor tested in clinical trials. Conversely, the limited information available on the molecular underpinnings of ALT has hindered thus far the development of genuine ALT-targeting agents. Moreover, whether anti-telomerase therapies may be hampered or not by possible adaptive responses is still debatable. Nonetheless, it is plausible hypothesizing that treatment with telomerase inhibitors may exert selective pressure for the emergence of cancer cells that become resistant to treatment by activating the ALT mechanism. This notion, together with the evidence that both telomere maintenance mechanisms may coexist within the same tumor and may distinctly impinge on patients’ outcomes, suggests that ALT may exert an unexpected role in tumor biology that still needs to be fully elucidated.

Telomerase is the ribonucleoprotein reverse transcriptase that catalyzes the synthesis of telomeres at the ends of linear chromosomes and contributes to proper telomere-loop (T-loop) formation. Formation of the T-loop, an obligate step before cell division can proceed, requires the generation of a 3′-overhang on the G-rich strand of telomeric DNA via telomerase or C-strand specific nucleases. Here, it is discovered that telomerase activity is critical for efficient cell-cycle progression using transient chemical inhibition by the telomerase inhibitor, imetelstat. Telomerase inhibition changed cell cycle kinetics and increased the proportion of cells in G2-phase, suggesting delayed clearance through this checkpoint. Investigating the possible contribution of unstructured telomere ends to these cell-cycle distribution changes, it was observed that imetelstat treatment induced γH2AX DNA damage foci in a subset of telomerase-positive cells but not telomerase-negative primary human fibroblasts. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation with γH2AX antibodies demonstrated imetelstat treatment-dependent enrichment of this DNA damage marker at telomeres. Notably, the effects of telomerase inhibition on cell cycle profile alterations were abrogated by pharmacological inhibition of the DNA-damage-repair transducer, ATM. Also, imetelstat potentiation of etoposide, a DNA-damaging drug that acts preferentially during S–G2 phases of the cell cycle, depends on functional ATM signaling. Thus, telomerase inhibition delays the removal of ATM-dependent DNA damage signals from telomeres in telomerase-positive cancer cells and interferes with cell cycle progression through G2. Implications: This study demonstrates that telomerase activity directly facilitates the progression of the cell cycle through modulation of transient telomere dysfunction signals. Mol Cancer Res; 16(8); 1215–25. ©2018 AACR.

Imetelstat, a novel telomerase inhibitor, failed to improve significantly median PFS and OS as maintenance therapy (±bevacizumab) in advanced NSCLC. Telomere length (TL) biomarker results were consistent with the hypothesis that telomerase inhibition is of greater benefit to patients with tumors possessing shorter telomeres; the patients with shorter TL had a trend toward longer median PFS and OS. Background Continuation or ‘switch’ maintenance therapy is commonly used in patients with advancd non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we evaluated the efficacy of the telomerase inhibitor, imetelstat, as switch maintenance therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients and methods The primary end point of this open-label, randomized phase II study was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with non-progressive, advanced NSCLC after platinum-based doublet (first-line) chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab), any histology, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1 were eligible. Randomization was 2 : 1 in favor of imetelstat, administered at 9.4 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, or observation. Telomere length (TL) biomarker exploratory analysis was carried out in tumor tissue by quantitative PCR (qPCR) and telomerase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results Of 116 patients enrolled, 114 were evaluable. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more frequent with imetelstat. Median PFS was 2.8 and 2.6 months for imetelstat-treated versus control [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.844; 95% CI 0.54–1.31; P = 0.446]. Median survival time favored imetelstat (14.3 versus 11.5 months), although not significantly (HR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.41–1.12; P = 0.129). Exploratory analysis demonstrated a trend toward longer median PFS (HR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.14–1.3; P = 0.124) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.11–1.46; P = 0.155) in imetelstat-treated patients with short TL, but no improvement in median PFS and OS in patients with long TL (HR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.39–1.88; and HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.2–1.28; P = 0.145). Conclusions Maintenance imetelstat failed to improve PFS in advanced NSCLC patients responding to first-line therapy. There was a trend toward a improvement in median PFS and OS in patients with short TL. Short TL as a predictive biomarker will require further investigation for the clinical development of imetelstat.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are thought to be responsible for tumor progression, metastasis, and recurrence. HER2 overexpression is associated with increased CSCs, which may explain the aggressive phenotype and increased likelihood of recurrence for HER2(+) breast cancers. Telomerase is reactivated in tumor cells, including CSCs, but has limited activity in normal tissues, providing potential for telomerase inhibition in anti-cancer therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a telomerase antagonistic oligonucleotide, imetelstat (GRN163L), on CSC and non-CSC populations of HER2(+) breast cancer cell lines. The effects of imetelstat on CSC populations of HER2(+) breast cancer cells were measured by ALDH activity and CD44/24 expression by flow cytometry as well as mammosphere assays for functionality. Combination studies in vitro and in vivo were utilized to test for synergism between imetelstat and trastuzumab. Imetelstat inhibited telomerase activity in both subpopulations. Moreover, imetelstat alone and in combination with trastuzumab reduced the CSC fraction and inhibited CSC functional ability, as shown by decreased mammosphere counts and invasive potential. Tumor growth rate was slower in combination-treated mice compared to either drug alone. Additionally, there was a trend toward decreased CSC marker expression in imetelstat-treated xenograft cells compared to vehicle control. Furthermore, the observed decrease in CSC marker expression occurred prior to and after telomere shortening, suggesting that imetelstat acts on the CSC subpopulation in telomere length-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Our study suggests addition of imetelstat to trastuzumab may enhance the effects of HER2 inhibition therapy, especially in the CSC population.

Purpose: Imetelstat is a covalently-lipidated 13-mer thiophosphoramidate oligonucleotide that acts as a potent specific inhibitor of telomerase. It binds with high affinity to the template region of the RNA component of human telomerase (hTERC) and is a competitive inhibitor of telomerase enzymatic activity. The purpose of this study was to determine the recommended phase II dose of imetelstat in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors. Experimental Design: Imetelstat was administered intravenously more than two hours on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. Dose levels of 225, 285, and 360 mg/m2 were evaluated, using the rolling-six design. Imetelstat pharmacokinetic and correlative biology studies were also performed during the first cycle. Results: Twenty subjects were enrolled (median age, 14 years; range, 3–21). Seventeen were evaluable for toxicity. The most common toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and lymphopenia, with dose-limiting myelosuppression in 2 of 6 patients at 360 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetics is dose dependent with a lower clearance at the highest dose level. Telomerase inhibition was observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells at 285 and 360 mg/m2. Two confirmed partial responses, osteosarcoma (n = 1) and Ewing sarcoma (n = 1), were observed. Conclusions: The recommended phase II dose of imetelstat given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle is 285 mg/m2. Clin Cancer Res; 19(23); 6578–84. ©2013 AACR.

Background: Preclinical studies have shown the combination of imetelstat (GRN163L), an inhibitor of telomerase, and T results in synergistic growth inhibition and restoration of T sensitivity in T-resistant cells (Clin Can Res 12(10):3184–92, 2006). Here we translate those findings to the clinic with the first-in-man phase I trial of imetelstat+ T in patients (pts) with T-refractory HER2+ metastatic disease. Methods: T (6 mg/kg q3 wk) was administered with increasing doses of imetelstat (240/300/375 mg/m2 q3 wk) using a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) was based on toxicity observed during cycle 1. Responding or stable pts continued treatment until progression. Tumor biopsy and bone marrow aspirate for biologic correlates were obtained at baseline and prior to cycle 2. Limited pharmacokinetics (PK) for T and imetelstat were included. Results: Ten pts were enrolled; median age was 54 (28–64). Patients were extensively pre-treated with the number of prior regimens ranging from 3 to >12. Prior cytotoxic therapies included anthracyclines (n = 9), taxanes (n = 9), vinorelbine (n = 8), capecitabine (n = 8), gemcitabine (n = 6), ixabepilone (n = 4), and eribulin (n = 4). Prior anti-HER2 targeted therapies included trastuzumab (n = 10), capecitabine (n = 8), T-DM1 (n = 6), and pertuzumab (n = 1). Therapy was well tolerated; no treatment related grade 4 toxicities were observed. Myelosuppression was limited to one pt with Grade 2 anemia and one each with Grade 2/3 thrombocytopenia. MTD was not reached. There were no objective responses; 2 pts. in cohort 3 had SD. Serial tumor biopsies and bone marrow aspirates have been analyzed for 7 pts (cohort 1: 001–004; cohort 2: 005–007; cohort 3: analysis ongoing). Tumor hTERT (p = ns) and phosphorylated HER2 (p = 0.03) decreased after treatment in nearly all pts. Bone marrow S-phase did not change consistently with treatment. Conclusion: The combination of trastuzumab + imetelstat is well tolerated and results in decreases in HER2 phosphorylation similar to that seen in preclinical models. Additional biologic correlates and PK analyses are ongoing. Further study of this combination in less heavily pre-treated patients is planned. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-13.

Imetelstat (GRN163L) is a specific telomerase inhibitor that has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and in patients with solid tumors. The antitumor effects were associated with the development of thrombocytopenia, one of the common side effects observed in patients treated with imetelstat. The events underlying these adverse effects are not apparent. In this report, we investigated the potential mechanisms that account for imetelstat's beneficial effects in MPN patients and the manner by which imetelstat treatment leads to a reduction in platelet numbers. Using a well-established system of ex vivo megakaryopoiesis, we demonstrated that imetelestat treatment affects normal megakaryocyte (MK) development by exclusively delaying maturation of MK precursor cells. By contrast, additional stages along MPN MK development were affected by imetelstat resulting in reduced numbers of assayable colony-forming unit MK and impaired MK maturation. In addition, treatment with imetelstat inhibited the secretion of fibrogenic growth factors by malignant but not by normal MK. Our results indicate that the delay observed in normal MK maturation may account for imetelstat-induced thrombocytopenia, while the more global effects of imetelstat on several stages along the hierarchy of MPN megakaryopoiesis may be responsible for the favorable clinical outcomes reported in MPN patients.

// Xuping Wu 1, * , Jing Zhang 2, * , Sijun Yang 3 , Zhihui Kuang 2 , Guolei Tan 1 , Gang Yang 1 , Qichun Wei 4 , Zhigang Guo 2 1 The Second Hospital of Nanjing Affiliated to Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing 210003, China 2 Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Molecular and Medical Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China 3 ABSL-3 Laboratory at The Center for Animal Experiment and State Key Lab of Virology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 31009, China * These authors contributed equally to this work and as the first author Correspondence to: Zhigang Guo, email: guozgang@gmail.com Xuping Wu, email: xuping_wu@yahoo.com Keywords: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, telomerase, radiosensitization, apoptosis Received: January 17, 2016 Accepted: January 03, 2017 Published: January 13, 2017 ABSTRACT The morbidity and mortality of esophageal cancer is one of the highest around the world and the principal therapeutic method is radiation. Thus, searching for sensitizers with lower toxicity and higher efficiency to improve the efficacy of radiation therapy is critical essential. Our research group has previously reported that imetelstat, the thio-phosphoramidate oligonucleotide inhibitor of telomerase, can decrease cell proliferation and colony formation ability as well as increase DNA breaks induced by radiation in esophageal cancer cells. Further study in this project showed that imetelstat significantly sensitized esophageal cancer cells to radiation in vitro . Later study showed that imetelstat leads to increased cell apoptosis. We also measured the expression level of several DNA repair and apoptosis signaling proteins. pS345 CHK1, γ-H2AX, p53 and caspase3 expression were up-regulated in imetelstat treated cells, identifying these factors as molecular markers. Mouse in vivo model using imetelstat at clinically achievable concentrations and fractionated irradiation scheme yielded results demonstrating radiosensitization effect. Finally, TUNEL assay, caspase 3 and Ki67 staining in tumor tissue proved that imetelstat sensitized esophageal cancer to radiation in vivo through promoting cell apoptosis and inhibiting cell proliferation. Our study supported imetelstat increase radiation sensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through inducing cell apoptosis and the specific inhibitor of telomerase might serve as a potential novel therapeutic tool for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma therapy.

Purpose: Telomerase activity is one of the hallmarks of cancer and is a highly relevant therapeutic target. The effects of a novel human telomerase antagonist, imetelstat, on primary human glioblastoma (GBM) tumor-initiating cells were investigated in vitro and in vivo. Experimental Design: Tumor-initiating cells were isolated from primary GBM tumors and expanded as neurospheres in vitro. The GBM tumor-initiating cells were treated with imetelstat and examined for the effects on telomerase activity levels, telomere length, proliferation, clonogenicity, and differentiation. Subsequently, mouse orthotopic and subcutaneous xenografts were used to assess the in vivo efficacy of imetelstat. Results: Imetelstat treatment produced a dose-dependent inhibition of telomerase (IC50 0.45 μmol/L). Long-term imetelstat treatment led to progressive telomere shortening, reduced rates of proliferation, and eventually cell death in GBM tumor-initiating cells. Imetelstat in combination with radiation and temozolomide had a dramatic effect on cell survival and activated the DNA damage response pathway. Imetelstat is able to cross the blood-brain barrier in orthotopic GBM xenograft tumors. Fluorescently labeled GBM tumor cells isolated from orthotopic tumors, following systemic administration of imetelstat (30 mg/kg every day for three days), showed ∼70% inhibition of telomerase activity. Chronic systemic treatment produced a marked decrease in the rate of xenograft subcutaneous tumor growth. Conclusion: This preclinical study supports the feasibility of testing imetelstat in the treatment of GBM patients, alone or in combination with standard therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 16(1); 154–63

Current drugs for myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis, including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, do not induce complete or partial remissions. Imetelstat is a 13-mer lipid-conjugated oligonucleotide that targets the RNA template of human telomerase reverse transcriptase.We sought to obtain preliminary information on the therapeutic activity and safety of imetelstat in patients with high-risk or intermediate-2-risk myelofibrosis. Imetelstat was administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion (starting dose, 9.4 mg per kilogram of body weight) every 1 to 3 weeks. The primary end point was the overall response rate, and the secondary end points were adverse events, spleen response, and independence from red-cell transfusions.A total of 33 patients (median age, 67 years) met the eligibility criteria; 48% had received prior JAK inhibitor therapy. A complete or partial remission occurred in 7 patients (21%), with a median duration of response of 18 months (range, 13 to 20+) for complete responses and 10 months (range, 7 to 10+) for partial responses. Bone marrow fibrosis was reversed in all 4 patients who had a complete response, and a molecular response occurred in 3 of the 4 patients. Response rates were 27% among patients with a JAK2 mutation versus 0% among those without a JAK2 mutation (P=0.30) and 32% among patients without an ASXL1 mutation versus 0% among those with an ASXL1 mutation (P=0.07). The rate of complete response was 38% among patients with a mutation in SF3B1 or U2AF1 versus 4% among patients without a mutation in these genes (P=0.04). Responses did not correlate with baseline telomere length. Treatment-related adverse events included grade 4 thrombocytopenia (in 18% of patients), grade 4 neutropenia (in 12%), grade 3 anemia (in 30%), and grade 1 or 2 elevation in levels of total bilirubin (in 12%), alkaline phosphatase (in 21%), and aspartate aminotransferase (in 27%).Imetelstat was found to be active in patients with myelofibrosis but also had the potential to cause clinically significant myelosuppression. (Funded by Geron; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01731951.).

The unsatisfactory outcomes for osteosarcoma necessitate novel therapeutic strategies. This study evaluated the effect of the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat in pre-clinical models of human osteosarcoma. Because the chaperone molecule HSP90 facilitates the assembly of telomerase protein, the ability of the HSP90 inhibitor alvespimycin to potentiate the effect of the telomerase inhibitor was assessed. The effect of single or combined treatment with imetelstat and alvespimycin on long-term growth was assessed in osteosarcoma cell lines (143B, HOS and MG-63) and xenografts derived from 143B cells. Results indicated that imetelstat as a single agent inhibited telomerase activity, induced telomere shortening, and inhibited growth in all 3 osteosarcoma cell lines, though the bulk cell cultures did not undergo growth arrest. Combined treatment with imetelstat and alvespimycin resulted in diminished telomerase activity and shorter telomeres compared to either agent alone as well as higher levels of γH2AX and cleaved caspase-3, indicative of increased DNA damage and apoptosis. With dual telomerase and HSP90 inhibition, complete growth arrest of bulk cell cultures was achieved. In xenograft models, all 3 treatment groups significantly inhibited tumor growth compared with the placebo-treated control group, with the greatest effect seen in the combined treatment group (imetelstat, p = 0.045, alvespimycin, p = 0.034; combined treatment, p = 0.004). In conclusion, HSP90 inhibition enhanced the effect of telomerase inhibition in pre-clinical models of osteosarcoma. Dual targeting of telomerase and HSP90 warrants further investigation as a therapeutic strategy.

INTRODUCTION: Telomerase activation is critical in many cancers including CNS tumors making telomerase inhibition a potential therapeutic target. Imetelstat is an oligonucleotide that binds to the template region of the RNA component of human telomerase and inhibits its enzymatic activity. METHODS: We conducted a molecular biology (MB) and phase II study to estimate inhibition of tumor telomerase activity and sustained responses by imetelstat in children with recurrent CNS malignancies. In the MB study, patients with recurrent medulloblastoma, high-grade glioma (HGG) or ependymoma undergoing resection received one dose of imetelstat as a 2-hour intravenous infusion at 285 mg/m2, 12-24 hours before surgery. Telomerase activity was evaluated by TRAP assay in fresh tumor from surgery. Post-surgery and in the phase II study, patients received imetelstat IV (days 1 and 8 q 21-days) at 285mg/m2. Imetelstat pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies were performed during cycle 1. RESULTS: Of 2 evaluable patients on the MB trial, intratumoral telomerase activity was inhibited by 95% compared to baseline archival tissue in one patient (HGG) and was inevaluable in one patient (medulloblastoma) due to tumor hemorrhage. Forty-two patients (40 evaluable for toxicity) were enrolled: 9 medulloblastomas, 18 HGG, 4 ependymomas, 9 diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (32.5%), lymphopenia (17.5%), neutropenia (12.5%), ALT (7.5%) and AST (5%) elevation. Two patients died of intratumoral hemorrhage secondary to thrombocytopenia leading to premature study closure. The median number of courses in the phase II trial was 1 (range 1-3). No objective responses were observed. Telomerase inhibition was observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for at least 8 days. CONCLUSION: Imetelstat demonstrated intratumoral and PBMC target inhibition; however, the regimen proved too toxic in children with recurrent CNS tumors.

Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent and aggressive type of adult brain tumor. Most GBMs express telomerase; a high level of intra-tumoral telomerase activity (TA) is predictive of poor prognosis. Thus, telomerase inhibitors are promising options to treat GBM. These inhibitors increase the response to radiotherapy (RT), in vitro as well as in vivo. Since typical treatments for GBM include RT, our objective was to evaluate the efficiency of Imetelstat (TA inhibitor) combined with RT. Findings We used a murine orthotopic model of human GBM (N = 8 to11 mice per group) and μMRI imaging to evaluate the efficacy of Imetelstat (delivered by intra-peritoneal injection) alone and combined with RT. Using a clinically established protocol, we demonstrated that Imetelstat significantly: (i) inhibited the TA in the very center of the tumor, (ii) reduced tumor volume as a proportion of TA inhibition, and (iii) increased the response to RT, in terms of tumor volume regression and survival increase. Conclusions Imetelstat is currently evaluated in refractory brain tumors in young patients (without RT). Our results support its clinical evaluation combined with RT to treat GBM. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12943-015-0376-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Malignant gliomas, including anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma, are the most common malignant primary brain tumors in adults. Patients with these tumors typically undergo surgery followed by radiation therapy and chemotherapy (Levin et al., 1990; Recht et al., 1990). Despite aggressive therapy, patients with glioblastoma survive only about one year after diagnosis (Burger et al., 1990; Miller et al., 1990; Shibamoto et al., 1990), and patients with anaplastic astrocytoma usually survive only a few years (Burger et al., 1990). Clearly, there is a great need for effective therapies that will preferentially target these tumors and spare normal tissues. Telomerase is a specialized ribonucleoprotein polymerase that contains the integral RNA component hTR with a short template segment that directs the synthesis of telomeric repeats at the ends of chromosomes (Greider and Blackburn, 1985; Yu et al., 1990). Human chromosomes terminate with several kilobases of the simple telomere hexanucleotide repeat d(TTAGGG)n. Telomerase elongates telomeric DNA by these repeats and plays an important role in cellular immortalization. The vast majority of normal somatic cells either do not express telomerase activity or express it at very low levels. Therefore, gradual telomeric shortening occurs at each cell division, and this eventually leads to death of the cell. In contrast, telomerase is expressed and functionally active in a wide variety of human tumors, including bladder, breast, prostate, and head and neck tumors (Hiyama et al., 1995; Kim et al., 1994; Lin et al., 1996; Mao et al., 1996; Sommerfeld et al., 1996; Sugino et al., 1996). Thus, cancer cell DNA is continuously extended or maintained by telomerase to compensate for the loss of telomeric repeats (Counter et al., 1992), and as a result the cells become immortalized. Telomerase is also expressed in the vast majority of primary brain tumors but not in normal brain tissues (Chong et al., 1998; Langford et al., 1995; Le et al., 1998; Mori et al., 1997; Sano et al., 1998). For example, Le et al. (1998) found telomerase activity in 89% of glioblastomas and 45% of anaplastic astrocytomas, but it was absent in normal brain tissues. Therefore, inhibition of telomerase provides a therapeutic strategy for selectively targeting malignant gliomas and sparing normal brain tissue. It is important to note that a group of gliomas with exceptionally long telomeres, >17 kb, have been identified (Hakin-Smith et al., 2003). These tumors are thought to maintain their telomeres by a mechanism termed alternative lengthening of telomeres, and these tumors can be either telomerase positive or telomerase negative. Thus telomere length, by itself, is not a definitive indication of telomerase activity. The 13-mer oligonucleotide N3′→ P5′ thio-phosphoramidate GRN163 (Geron Corporation, Menlo Park, Calif.), which binds to the telomerase RNA subunit hTR at the template region (Gryaznov et al., 2001; Herbert et al., 2002), has shown potent inhibitory activity against human telomerase in several biochemical assays. In vitro, telomerase inhibition by GRN163 induces cellular senescence and apoptosis in several human tumor cell lines, and these effects are accompanied by telomere shortening (Herbert et al., 2002). We report experimental evidence showing that GRN163 inhibited the growth of s.c. human U-251 MG glioblastoma xenografts in mice. The compound also exhibited favorable i.c. uptake and biodistribution properties, prevented the growth of U-251 MG cells in rats, and increased the survival times of rats bearing i.c. tumors.

Background/Aims: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive cancer with limited treatment options outside of chemotherapy. Improved therapies with novel mechanisms of action are desperately needed to fill this need. Both hTERT, the catalytic subunit of telomerase, and BCL-2, an apoptotic regulator, are overexpressed in AML, correlating with disease severity and poor prognosis respectively. Imetelstat is a novel, first-in-class competitive inhibitor of telomerase with clinical activity in hematologic malignancies. Venetoclax, an approved BCL-2 inhibitor for CLL, has shown a promising clinical benefit in AML patients. Preclinical evidence shows that downregulation of hTERT induces apoptosis via disruptions of hTERT and BCL-2 interaction; we hypothesize that inhibiting both targets would yield greater anti-tumor activity in AML compared to treatment with either agent alone. Methods: AML cell lines and AML patient’s PBMC samples were treated with imetelstat or venetoclax alone, or in combination, and viable and apoptotic populations of cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Telomerase activity, hTERT expression and mitochondrial dysfunction were investigated for mechanism of action. Furthermore, an in vivo study in the MOLM-13 AML disseminated model was conducted to assess efficacy and survival. Results: A dose-dependent synergistic activity in inducing apoptosis was observed in multiple AML cell lines when combining imetelstat with venetoclax. In the MOLM-13 cell line, single-agent imetelstat and venetoclax had modest apoptotic activity after 48 hours (22% and 30% respectively), but the combination achieved 88% at 48 hours and nearly 100% at 96 hours. Similarly enhanced apoptotic activity was also observed in PBMCs purified from 4 AML patient whole blood samples. Molecular analyses showed combining imetelstat with venetoclax reduced hTERT expression and telomerase activity much more strongly than either agent alone. Furthermore, in vivo studies showed all mice tolerated the combination of imetelstat with ABT-199 well, with increased life span as compared to the vehicle control (68.1%, p=0.0001), to imetelstat (39.6%, p=0.0011) alone, or to venetoclax (23.3%, p=0.0001) alone. In the combination group, 40% of treated mice were alive 77-days after treatment discontinued whereas all mice of the other single agent arms died within two weeks, demonstrating a significant survival benefit. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first investigation combining imetelstat with venetoclax in AML, and the results demonstrated a synergistic effect on induction of apoptosis in cell lines and patient samples in vitro, which translated into prolonged survival in xenograft models, thus providing a strong rationale for clinical exploration of this combination. Citation Format: Joshua J. Rusbuldt, Leopoldo Luistro, Diana Chin, Melissa Smith, Amy Wong, Margarita Romero, Aleksandra Rizo, Jacqueline Bussolari, Fei Huang, Amy (Kate) Sasser. Telomerase inhibitor imetelstat in combination with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax enhances apoptosis in vitro and increases survival in vivo in acute myeloid leukemia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1101. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1101

Background/Aims: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), including essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV) and myelofibrosis (MF), are clonal disorders characterized by unlimited proliferation of hematopoietic cells. Besides the dominant clone, in the majority of cases defined by a driver mutation (JAK2V617F, CALR or MPL mutation), sub-clones carrying additional mutations (e. g. in the genes ASXL1, CBL, DNMT3A, EZH2, IDH1, U2AF1, SF3B1, TET2, TP53) and/or normal polyclonal hematopoiesis coexist. Due to the loss of telomere sequences with each cell division, the length of telomeres can be used to describe clonal dynamics of hematopoietic cells. In neoplastic cells with a high mitotic rate shorter telomeres are typically found compared to the telomere length (TL) in normal counterparts. In the ET phase 2 study with the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat we demonstrated rapid and durable hematologic and molecular responses (Baerlocher et al. N Engl J Med 2015) and suppression of clones with non-driver mutations (Oppliger Leibundgut et al, ASH 2015). Here, our aims were 1) to evaluate the TL in subsets of leukocytes from patients (pts) with MPN compared to healthy individuals and 2) to study the TL dynamics in ET pts treated with imetelstat and to correlate those with hematologic and molecular responses. Patients and Methods: Blood samples from 63 standard of care (SOC)-treated or untreated pts with MPN (15 ET, 36 PV, 12 MF) diagnosed according to WHO 2008 criteria as well as from 14 ET pts treated with imetelstat after failure or intolerance to ≥1 prior therapy were analyzed for TL. TL percentiles from over 400 healthy individuals served as reference. Leukocytes were extracted from the peripheral blood and TL was measured in subsets of leukocytes by automated multicolor flow-FISH (Baerlocher et al, Nat Protoc. 2006). Results: 81% of the 62 MPN pts (11/15 ET, 32/35 PV, 7/12 MF) carried a JAK2 mutation, 6 (1 ET, 5 MF) a CALR mutation, 1 ET pt had a MPL mutation, 2 ET pts were triple negative and 3 PV pts were JAK2 wild type. 23 pts were treated with phlebotomy, 32 with hydroxyurea, 3 with anagrelide and 3 with IFN-alpha. The median age at study entry was 62 yrs (23-89, ET/PV/MF 64/58/66 yrs) and the median time since diagnosis was 2.7 yrs (0.3-14.2) in the ET SOC cohort. In the imetelstat cohort, 9/14 ET pts carried a JAK2V617F mutation and 5 a CALR mutation. The median age at study entry was 60.5 yrs (21-80) and the median time since diagnosis was 6.7 yrs (0.3-21). The telomere length values (TLV) in granulocytes from the 63 MPN pts on SOC were around the 10th percentile for pts with ET and PV and below the 1st percentile for most pts with MF. In the imetelstat cohort, 8 of 14 ET pts with a median of 2 prior therapies demonstrated TLV in granulocytes Conclusions: The lower TLV found in granulocytes of pts with MPN and especially with MF compared to healthy individuals reflect the higher mitotic history of malignant clones. In the ET imetelstat cohort, the very low TLV found at baseline might result from longer disease duration and resistance and/or intolerance to prior therapies. The higher TLV observed after 9 months of treatment with imetelstat and correlation with the reduction in the driver mutational burden suggests that imetelstat treatment in ET pts may suppress neoplastic clones and, in the absence of a high additional mutational burden, favor recovery of normal hematopoiesis. Disclosures Oppliger Leibundgut: Geron: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Burington:Geron Corporation: Employment. Ottmann:Fusion Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Spitzer:Trovagene Inc: Consultancy; Moldx Palmetto GBA: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Odenike:CTI/Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Algeta Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Suneisis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Research Funding. McDevitt:Salamandra Inc: Consultancy; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Röth:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Geron: Research Funding. Snyder:Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Baerlocher:Geron: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

We report that Imetelstat, a telomerase inhibitor that binds to the RNA component of telomerase (hTR), can sensitize primary CLL lymphocytes to fludarabine in vitro. This effect was observed in lymphocytes from clinically resistant cases and with cytogenetic abnormalities associated with bad prognosis. Imetelstat mediated-sensitization to fludarabine was not associated with telomerase activity, but with the basal expression of Ku80. Since both Imetelstat and Ku80 bind hTR, we assessed 1) if Ku80 and Imetelstat alter each other's binding to hTR in vitro and 2) the effect of an oligonucleotide complementary to the Ku binding site in hTR (Ku oligo) on the survival of primary CLL lymphocytes exposed to fludarabine. We show that Imetelstat interferes with the binding of Ku70/80 (Ku) to hTR and that the Ku oligo can sensitize CLL lymphocytes to FLU. Our results suggest that Ku binding to hTR may contribute to fludarabine resistance in CLL lmphocytes. This is the first report highlighting the potentially broad effectiveness of Imetelstat in CLL, and the potential biological and clinical implications of a functional interaction between Ku and hTR in primary human cancer cells.

Telomerase is a cellular ribonucleoprotein reverse transcriptase that plays a crucial role in telomere maintenance. This enzyme is expressed in approximately 90% of human tumors, but not in the majority of normal somatic cells. Imetelstat sodium (GRN163L), is a 13-mer oligonucleotide N3'-> P5' thio-phosphoramidate lipid conjugate, which represents the latest generation of telomerase inhibitors targeting the template region of the human functional telomerase RNA (hTR) subunit. In preclinical trials, this compound has been found to inhibit telomerase activity in multiple cancer cell lines, as well as in vivo xenograft mouse models. Currently, GRN163L is being investigated in several clinical trials, including a phase II human non-small cell lung cancer clinical. trial, in a maintenance setting following standard doublet chemotherapy. In addition to the inhibition of telomerase activity in cancer cell lines, GRN163L causes morphological cell rounding changes, independent of hTR expression or telomere length. This leads to the loss of cell adhesion properties; however, the mechanism underlying this effect is not yet fully understood. In the present study, we observed that GRN163L treatment leads to the loss of adhesion in A549 lung cancer cells, due to decreased E-cadherin expression, leading to the disruption of the cytoskeleton through the alteration of actin, tubulin and intermediate filament organization. Consequently, the less adherent cancer cells initially cease to proliferate and are arrested in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, accompanied by decreased matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) expression. These effects of GRN163L are independent of its telomerase catalytic activity and may increase the therapeutic efficacy of GRN163L by decreasing the adhesion, proliferation and metastatic potential of cancer cells in vivo.

The catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hTERT) is highly expressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Transcriptional factors and epigenetic modifications regulate this expression. Studies suggest hypermethylation promotes hTERT overexpression. Imetelstat is a competitive telomerase inhibitor. Decitabine (DAC) and azacitidine (AZA) are DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTIs) used in the treatment of AML. Combining imetelstat and DNMTI may be an improved treatment option for AML. We investigated effects of DAC and AZA on hTERT expression and cell viability in AML cell lines OCI-AML3 and OCI-AML5, and evaluated growth inhibition when combined with imetelstat. OCI-AML3 had higher baseline expression of hTERT compared with OCI-AML5. Dose-dependent downregulation of hTERT expression was observed with DAC and AZA treatments. OCI-AML5 was more sensitive to DAC (1 μM, 46% viability) than OCI-AML3 (1 μM, 95% viability) whereas sensitivity to AZA was similar in both cell lines (1 μM, 29% vs 33% viability). After removal of the drugs, growth inhibition was not sustained and cell proliferation rebounded. Single-agent imetelstat reduced both hTERT expression and telomerase activity but resulted in only limited growth inhibition in these cell lines. It was hypothesized that combining DNMTI with imetelstat may exert more potent growth inhibition. To test this, both cell lines were treated with DAC or AZA for 72 hours followed by different concentrations of imetelstat for 2 to 4 weeks. Dose-dependent synergistic activity was demonstrated for DAC followed by imetelstat: OCI-AML3 cell viability changed from 95% with DAC to 61% and 10% after 2 and 4 weeks of imetelstat, respectively; OCI-AML5 cell viability changed from 46% with DAC to 6% and 1% after 2 and 4 weeks of imetelstat, respectively. In contrast, no enhanced activity was observed in either cell line with AZA followed by imetelstat, but imetelstat was able to slow the growth rebound after AZA removal. Additional studies are ongoing to further understand the mechanism of action of this drug combination in AML and to evaluate different combination sequences of DNMTI with imetelstat for optimal anticancer activity. In summary, DAC and AZA reduced hTERT expression and differentially inhibited cell viability in AML cell lines. Although at the same concentration AZA was more active than DAC in OCI-AML3 and OCI-AML5 lines, the sustainability of growth inhibition after washout differed. Growth rebounded after removal of AZA or DAC treatment. Dose-dependent synergistic activity demonstrated by DAC followed by imetelstat was not seen with AZA followed by imetelstat. Distinctly different mechanisms of action of DAC and AZA may underlie their differential activity when combined with imetelstat, warranting further investigation. Citation Format: Joshua Rusbuldt, Jacqueline Bussolari, Aleksandra Rizo, Fei Huang. Impact of hypomethylating agents on hTERT expression and synergistic effect in combination with imetelstat, a telomerase inhibitor, in AML cell lines. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2731.

Imetelstat is a covalently lipidated 13-mer N3′-P5′ thio-phosphoramidate (NPS) oligonucleotide (5′-TAGGGTTAGACAA-3′) that is complementary to the RNA template region (hTR; 3′-AUCCCAACCUGUU-5′) of telomerase. Imetelstat is believed to act as a direct competitive inhibitor of telomerase enzyme activity and to not have an antisense mechanism of action (MOA) typical of other oligonucleotides. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the thrombocytopenia observed in some patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm treated with imetelstat can be attributed to activation of toll-like receptors (TLRs) by imetelstat. Imetelstat and related control oligonucleotides (Mis-match and Sense) were tested using 7 different HEK-Blue™ TLR cell lines, each stably coexpressing a human TLR gene (TLR2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9) and a NF-κB-inducible secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) reporter gene. After 20 hours’ incubation, the cells were measured for absorbance at 650 nm for SEAP activity. Each TLR experiment was performed twice, with 3 replicates per experiment. The results showed that the positive control for each individual TLR was recognized by the corresponding TLR, leading to a strong SEAP activity, whereas imetelstat at a clinically relevant concentration range (10 μM-60 μM) and the control oligonucleotides related to imetelstat yielded no induction of SEAP activity (similar level to untreated). These data demonstrate that imetelstat has no stimulatory effect on the majority of the tested TLRs. Imetelstat yielded slightly higher induction on TLR8 than the untreated control, but significantly lower than the positive control. Although thrombocytopenia has been observed in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms treated with imetelstat, these data show that it cannot result from imetelstat acting as a ligand for TLRs. TLR9, associated with thrombocytopenia, was not activated by imetelstat and the slight activity of imetelstat on TLR8 is likely irrelevant as no link between TLR8 activation and thrombocytopenia has been reported. These findings are consistent with 13-mer sequence of imetelstat, differing from oligonucleotides known to stimulate TLR9, which comprise 2 CpG islands separated by 6-10 nucleotides and are longer than 21 nucleotides. Ex vivo studies have provided evidence that imetelstat may induce thrombocytopenia in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms by blocking the terminal maturation of normal megakaryocyte precursors: megakaryocytic differentiation requires upregulation of telomerase activity which is inhibited by imetelstat. Correct understanding of the MOA of imetelstat is vital to guide its clinical use and strategies to mitigate thrombocytopenia in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Citation Format: Gabriela M. Baerlocher, Joshua Rusbuldt, Fei Huang, Jacqueline Bussolari. Myelosuppression in patients treated with the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat is not mediated through activation of toll-like receptors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2732.