Search

Background Sarcopenia is a condition characterized by decreased skeletal muscle mass due to physiological ageing or to a concomitant disease such as neoplasia. In cancer patients, a low lean body mass is suggested to be a negative prognostic factor for survival and for the development of dose-limiting chemotherapy toxicities irrespective of disease stage. Aim To evaluate the prognostic role of sarcopenia in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing first-line chemotherapy. Methods Our retrospective analysis included 56 mCRC patients who received first-line chemotherapy from 2014 to 2017 at the Medical Oncology Unit of our hospital. Computerized scans were performed before starting chemotherapy and at the first disease reassessment. Sarcopenia was assessed using the skeletal mass index = muscle area in cm2/(height in m2) calculated at the L3 vertebra. Overall survival and objective response rate were evaluated. Toxicities were analyzed during the first four cycles of therapy and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. A loss of skeletal muscle mass ≥ 5% was considered indicative of deterioration in muscle condition. Results Median age was 67 years and 35.7% of patients were ≥ 70 years old. Fourteen patients (25%) were sarcopenic at baseline computed tomography (CT) scan (7/33 men; 7/23 women); 5/14 sarcopenic patients were ≥ 70 years old. Median follow-up was 26.8 mo (3.8-66.8 mo) and median overall survival was 27.2 mo (95%CI: 23.3-37.3). Sarcopenia was not correlated to overall survival (P = 0.362), to higher toxicities reported during the first 4 cycles of chemotherapy (P = 1.0) or to response to treatment (P = 0.221). At the first disease reassessment, a skeletal muscle loss (SML) ≥ 5% was found in 17 patients (30.3%) 3 of whom were already sarcopenic at baseline CT scan, while 7 patients became sarcopenic. SML was not correlated to overall survival (P = 0.961). No statistically significant correlation was found between baseline sarcopenia and age (P = 1.0), body mass index (P = 0.728), stage at diagnosis (P = 0.355) or neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.751). Conclusion Neither baseline sarcopenia nor SML affected survival. In addition, baseline sarcopenia was not related to worse treatment toxicity. However, these results must be interpreted with caution due to the limited sample size.

Background Immunosuppression induced by anticancer therapy in a COVID-19-positive asymptomatic patient with cancer may have a devastating effect and, eventually, be lethal. To identify asymptomatic cases among patients receiving active cancer treatment, the Federico II University Hospital in Naples performs rapid serological tests in addition to hospital standard clinical triage for COVID-19 infection. Methods From 6 to 17 April 2020, all candidates for chemotherapy, radiotherapy or target/immunotherapy, if negative at the standard clinical triage on the day scheduled for anticancer treatment, received a rapid serological test on peripheral blood for COVID-19 IgM and IgG detection. In case of COVID-19 IgM and/or IgG positivity, patients underwent a real-time PCR (RT-PCR) SARS-CoV-2 test to confirm infection, and active cancer treatment was delayed. Results Overall 466 patients, negative for COVID-19 symptoms, underwent serological testing in addition to standard clinical triage. The average age was 61 years (range 25–88 years). Most patients (190, 40.8%) had breast cancer, and chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy was administered in 323 (69.3%) patients. Overall 433 (92.9%) patients were IgG-negative and IgM-negative, and 33 (7.1%) were IgM-positive and/or IgG-positive. Among the latter patients, 18 (3.9%), 11 (2.4%) and 4 (0.9%) were IgM-negative/IgG-positive, IgM-positive/IgG-negative and IgM-positive/IgG-positive, respectively. All 33 patients with a positive serological test, tested negative for RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 test. No patient in our cohort developed symptoms suggestive of active COVID-19 infection. Conclusion Rapid serological testing at hospital admission failed to detect active asymptomatic COVID-19 infection. Moreover, it entailed additional economic and human resources, delayed therapy administrationand increased hospital accesses.

The proportion of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving second or further lines of treatment has not been widely studied. To shed light on this issue, we retrospectively analysed the treatments administered for metastatic disease, and investigated prognostic factors after a diagnosis of metastases, in a consecutive cohort of mCRC patients. Three hundred forty-six mCRC patients were enrolled: 173 were stage II or III (metachronous group), and 173 stage IV (synchronous group) at diagnosis. Survival was calculated between the date of metastatic disease and the date of death or last follow-up. Patients with synchronous lesions more frequently had multiple disease sites, peritoneal carcinomatosis and massive liver deposits, whereas significantly more patients with metachronous lesions developed lung metastases as the sole disease site. 97.4% patients received at least one, 62.4% two, 41.9% three and 23.7% four treatment lines. Patients with metachronous metastases more frequently underwent surgery of metastases in first-line treatment (48.5 versus 24.8%), and more of them were progression-free at the time of the analysis (44 versus 34.9%). At univariate analysis, age > 70 years, multiple disease sites and peritoneal carcinomatosis were associated with significantly decreased survival, whereas surgery of metastases and isolated lung metastases predicted better survival. At multivariate analysis, only peritoneal carcinomatosis and surgery of metastases independently affected survival. The percentage of patients who received an active treatment decreased going from first- to fourth-line treatment. However, the proportion of patients who received efficacious treatment in advanced line remained high. Surgery of metastases was the most important prognostic factors.

BackgroundAnalysis of K- and N-RAS mutations is mandatory before planning treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, because only RAS wild-type (WT) patients can benefit from treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab).Case reportHere we report the case of a 69-year-old male patient affected by metastatic sigmoid cancer. He underwent left hemicolectomy, and histology diagnosed a well-differentiated, pT4, node-positive adenocarcinoma; KRAS analysis performed with direct sequencing identified a mutation in exon 2 of the KRAS gene (GGT->GTT). After first-line chemotherapy with FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab, the patient underwent surgical resection of residual liver metastases. Histology showed metastatic deposits from colic adenocarcinoma with extensive coagulative necrosis. Mutational analysis of the KRAS gene was also performed on liver metastases by pyrosequencing assay, and no mutation was identified. Due to the discordant results (GGT->GTT exon 2 KRAS mutation in the primary tumor, and KRAS-WT in the liver metastases), mutational analysis on liver metastasis was repeated using next-generation sequencing and enriching the sample in tumor cells by manual microdissection; the same type of mutation of the primary tumor (GGT->GTT exon 2 KRAS gene) was confirmed.ConclusionsAccurate tissue sampling and adequately sensitive assays are essential to correctly identify colorectal cancer patients who can be treated with an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody.

Rationale: Paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis (PLE) is one of the most common causes of neurologic paraneoplastic syndromes, with unclear pathogenesis. While several reports published in the last decades showed the occurrence of PLE in a variety of cancers, only a few cases have been associated with colon cancer. Patient concerns: In February 2017, a 54-year-old man with clinical history of radically resected colon cancer started first line chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab, after radiological diagnosis of multiple liver and bone metastases. During the third cycle of treatment, the patient developed psychomotor agitation and hallucinations followed by severe consciousness level reduction and cognitive impairment. Diagnoses: Magnetic resonance imaging showed hyperintense signals in both hippocampal areas, insula and right cingulate gyrus on fluid attenuated inversion recovery, diffusion weighted imaging, and T2-weighted images, highly suggestive of limbic encephalitis. Other causes (brain metastases, toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents, and infections) were excluded. Interventions: Empirical immunosuppressive treatment (high-dose immunoglobulins and corticosteroids) was administered and chemotherapy was resumed. Outcomes: A slowly progressive improvement in neurological condition has been observed, even though radiological signs of limbic encephalitis are still evident. Lessons: The present case highlights the complex diagnostic process of PLE, and the lack of a standard treatment. Moreover, the absence of correlation between PLE and tumor progression or tumor burden, and the opportunity of treating underlying neoplasm is discussed.

Background The standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (clinical tumor, node, metastases [TNM] stage II or III) is radiotherapy before surgery (with or without concomitant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy) followed by surgery. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting of patients is controversial in terms of the overall benefit on survival, the subgroup of patients who might not need it, and the best regimen (combination regimens vs. fluoropyrimidine alone). Patients and Methods Based on the retrospective analysis of the clinical outcome of all patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma treated at our institute during the past 9 years, we comment on prognostic factors for local and distant metastases of patients who received neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery, and the scientific evidence that can help to decide the adjuvant chemotherapy. Results We conclude that pathological TNM stage after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (ypTNM) stage after surgery significantly affects disease-free and overall survival. In particular, patients with pathologically positive lymph nodes (ypN+) after surgery have a high probability of developing distant metastases. Conclusion ypN+ patients are candidate for intensified adjuvant chemotherapy.