Search

PURPOSE Genomic profiling programs have been implemented to apply next-generation sequencing (NGS) for facilitating trial enrollment. SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN is a large-scale genomic profiling program in advanced gastrointestinal cancers using a validated genomic assay with the goal of facilitating enrollment in targeted clinical trials, generating real-world data, and performing clinicogenomic analysis for biomarker discovery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Genotyping of tumor tissue samples from 5,743 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers enrolled in GI-SCREEN was centrally performed with NGS. Patients were enrolled in matched trials of targeted agents affiliated with GI-SCREEN on the basis of genotyping results. RESULTS A total of 11 gastrointestinal cancers were included, with colorectal cancer being the most common. The median age ranged from 59 to 70.5 years across cancer types. Patients enrolled after initiation of first-line treatment had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than that before treatment initiation with a median survival time difference of 8.9 months and a hazard ratio (HR) ranging from 0.25 to 0.73 across cancer types, demonstrating an immortal time bias. One hundred and forty-nine patients received matched therapies in clinical trials on the basis of their identified alterations. Among patients with colorectal cancer harboring actionable alterations, the median OS was significantly longer in patients who received matched therapies in trials than in those who did not (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.01; P = .049). Cancer-specific pathway alterations were significantly associated with shorter survival and related to primary resistance to matched trial therapies. CONCLUSION Our genomic profiling program led to patient enrollment in targeted clinical trials and improved survival of patients with colorectal cancer who received matched therapies in clinical trials. To avoid immortal time bias, precautions are needed when using data from patients who have undergone NGS testing after initiation of the evaluated treatment line.

In Japan, the population aged 65 years and above accounts for 29% of the total population. Furthermore, the number of cancer patients among the elderly is increasing. Geriatric oncology is a discipline that deals with appropriate care for elderly cancer patients based on their characteristics. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology considers education, treatment, research, and partnership building areas of significance and priority for policy goals. In Japan, the Third Term of the Basic Plan to Promote Cancer Control is an initiative to improve the infrastructure and health services involved in cancer care. Content related to “cancer in the elderly” was added to establish guidelines for treating cancer in the elderly. Thus far, “Clinical Practice Guidelines of Cancer Drug Therapies for the Elderly” have been published. With the increasing age of the population, social security expenditures will increase substantially after the fiscal year 2022. Reforms to social security systems, such as pensions, medical care, and nursing care, are underway. It is important to enhance cooperation between oncology and geriatrics and to support cooperative systems among families and medical professionals to promote geriatric oncology. Since the working-age population and the total population have begun to decline, Japan is facing many challenges. As a leader of a super-aging society, Japan has the potential to share its experience on a global scale and address potential long-term outcomes.

Background Safe and effective treatments for advanced esophageal cancer are an unmet need in Japan. We report results of a subgroup analysis of Japanese patients enrolled in KEYNOTE-181, a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer whose disease progressed after standard first-line therapy. Methods Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks or investigator’s choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan. Efficacy was evaluated in all Japanese patients and in those with programmed death ligand 1 combined positive score ≥ 10. Results Of the 152 Japanese patients enrolled (pembrolizumab, n = 77; chemotherapy, n = 75), 150 (98.7%) had squamous cell carcinoma and 79 (52.0%) had combined positive score ≥ 10. At the final analysis, median overall survival was improved among all patients (12.4 vs 8.2 months with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI 0.48–0.97) and patients with combined positive score ≥ 10 (12.6 vs 8.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI 0.42–1.10). Fewer patients had any-grade (74.0% vs 95.9%) or grade 3–5 (16.9 vs 50.0%) treatment-related adverse events with pembrolizumab than with chemotherapy. Conclusion Consistent with the global trial results, second-line pembrolizumab therapy showed a survival benefit and a favorable safety profile compared with chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FLHCC) is a rare a rare subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma. The IMbrave150 trial demonstrated that atezolizumab and bevacizumab therapy (ABT) has better treatment outcomes than sorafenib for advanced HCC. However, since patients with known FLHCC were excluded from this trial, the effects of ABT on FLHCC remain unknown. We report the first case of ABT for advanced FLHCC followed by hepatectomy presenting pseudoprogression of lymph node (LN) metastases which was pathologically proven after surgery. The patient was a 30-year-old man with advanced FLHCC and multiple LN metastases behind the pancreatic head, and ABT was introduced. After four courses of treatment, CT indicated a minor decrease in the intratumor vascularity of the liver tumor. However, the size of metastatic LNs increased. Subsequently, the patient presented with bloody stool, and colonoscopy revealed immune-related colitis caused by atezolizumab. Therefore, the fifth course was canceled. A right hemihepatectomy following percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization (PTPE) was performed to increase the future liver remnant volume. After PTPE, dynamic CT revealed an objective response to ABT; SD in RECIST 1.1 (7% increase in the LN size and no change of liver tumor), and PR in modified RECIST (47% decrease in the intratumor vascularity of the liver tumor and LNs). Three weeks after PTPE, right hemihepatectomy plus nodal dissection was successfully performed. Pathological findings revealed that approximately 60%–70% of the liver tumor and 70%–80% of the metastatic LNs were necrotic, indicating a good response to ABT. The increasing size of metastatic LNs that occurred during the treatment course was deemed pseudoprogression. Pseudoprogression can be found in patients with solid malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, however, rarely occurs in HCC. The first response to metastatic LNs was observed 20 weeks after ABT initiation combined with an increase in nodal volume and a decrease in vascularity. In the updated data of the IMbrave150 trial, 19% of the first responses occurred after week 24. Physicians should consider that ABT may also be effective in FLHCC and may cause pseudoprogression before determining a treatment strategy.

PURPOSE ERBB2 copy number (CN), measured using next-generation sequencing, is a predictive biomarker for trastuzumab efficacy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive advanced esophagogastric and gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to investigate the association of ERBB2 amplification and gene coalterations with response and resistance to trastuzumab-combined chemotherapy. METHODS The SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN was a comprehensive genomic profiling project of GI cancer tissues using Oncomine Cancer Research Panel and Oncomine Comprehensive Assay. From 885 patients with AGC who successfully underwent gene profiling, 74 with ERBB2 amplification (CN ≥ 4.0) and who received first-line trastuzumab-combined chemotherapy were selected, and ERBB2 CN and gene coalterations were assessed. RESULTS ERBB2 CN did not differ in tumor response to trastuzumab-combined chemotherapy (one-way analysis of variance test, P = .37). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model revealed that ERBB2 CN (continuous log2-converted CN, hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.93; P < .01) and receptor/oncogene amplifications in the HER2 signaling pathway (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.3; P = .01) were significant predictors for progression-free survival (PFS). ERBB2 variants coexisted in five patients (7%) and were missense mutations. Two patients with low variant allele frequencies (VAFs; 8%, 12%) showed high ERBB2 CN (55, 80) and durable response (≥ 20 months), whereas three patients with high VAFs (66%–90%) showed low ERBB2 CN (8-11) and no response with short PFS (1-10 months). CONCLUSION ERBB2 CN and gene coamplification in the HER2 signaling pathway were positive and negative predictors of PFS in trastuzumab-treated HER2-positive AGC patients, respectively. HER2-positive AGC patients with a high VAF of ERBB2 showed poor outcomes and may need HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors and trastuzumab deruxtecan.

Safety of combination chemotherapy using platinum and fluorouracil has not been evaluated adequately for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in elderly patients.We initiated a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) as first-line therapy for patients with AGC aged ≥70 years. Planned assessment of toxicity was made upon recruitment of the first 20 patients.In five out of 20 patients, unacceptable toxicity was observed, including three patients who were unable to complete the initial two courses due to adverse events. Among the other 15 patients, dose reduction due to toxicity were needed in 10 and treatment delay for adverse events also occurred in 12 patients during the first two courses.Early analyses of safety suggest that the CapeOX regimen was not tolerated without dose reduction for elderly patients with AGC in this study.

This phase 1b trial evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of S-1, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination therapy (S-IROX) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC).Patients aged 20-75 years with APC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible to receive escalating doses of S-1 (60 or 80 mg msup2/sup·day) on days 1-7, fixed doses of oxaliplatin (85 mg/msup2/sup) biweekly, and escalating doses of irinotecan (150, 165, or 180 mg/msup2/sup) once every 2 weeks. In the dose-escalation cohort, a 3 + 3 design was used to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and explore the recommended dose (RD). A dose-expansion cohort was added to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination. This trial was registered at UMIN-CTR (UMIN000012054).Approximately 47 patients were enrolled, of whom 45 were eligible for the analysis. The MTD was not determined, but the RD was determined to be dose level 1 based on a review of data from each level. Among the 45 patients, the ORR was 51.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 35.8-66.3%]. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.1-8.8 months) and 15.8 months (95% CI, 9.8-20.8 months), respectively. Common adverse events included neutropenia, elevated liver enzyme levels, diarrhoea, and nausea.The S-IROX regimen showed promising efficacy with manageable toxicities in Japanese patients with APC. A randomised phase 2/3 trial comparing S-IROX, mFOLFIRINOX, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is currently ongoing (jRCTs031190009).

BackgroundBiliary tract cancer (BTC) has a poor prognosis and lacks a standardized second-line therapy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 4, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) are highly expressed in BTC. Therefore, lenvatinib (a known inhibitor of VEGF receptors 1–3, FGFRs 1–4, and PDGFR-α) was evaluated for second-line treatment of BTC.MethodsIn this single-arm, multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study, patients with BTC received lenvatinib 24 mg orally once daily in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS rate at 12 weeks, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, safety and pharmacokinetic profiles.ResultsTwenty-six Japanese patients were enrolled and treated; 3 had a confirmed partial response per investigator assessment and per independent imaging review (IIR); ORR was 11.5% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2–27.2). Median PFS was 3.19 months (95% CI: 2.79–7.23) per investigator assessment and 1.64 months (95% CI: 1.41–3.19) per IIR. Median OS was 7.35 months (95% CI: 4.50–11.27). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 21 patients (80.8%) and included hypertension (n = 10 [38.5%]), proteinuria (n = 3 [11.5%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (n = 3 [11.5%]), decreased appetite (n = 3 [11.5%]), and anemia (n = 3 [11.5%]). Two deaths occurred due to TEAEs between treatment initiation and 30 days after last dose, but neither were considered treatment related.ConclusionsLenvatinib demonstrated antitumor activity in BTC, with a tolerable safety profile, and should be further evaluated as potential second-line therapy for this difficult to treat population.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT02579616. Date of registration: October 19, 2015.

This open-label first-in-human study evaluated JPH203, which is a novel selective L-type amino acid transporter 1 inhibitor. We also evaluated the association between the N-acetyltransferase 2 phenotype and outcomes. Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors received daily intravenous JPH203 treatment for 7 days, followed by a 21-day rest period, at escalating doses of 12–85 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities were evaluated during the first cycle using a 3 + 3 design. The study enrolled 17 patients, although grade 3 liver dysfunction was detected in one of six patients receiving 60 mg/m2 and in the first patient to receive 85 mg/m2. Further enrollment was terminated and the maximum tolerated dose was defined as 60 mg/m2. The AUC∞ increased between 12 mg/m2 and 25 mg/m2, although no differences were observed at 25–40 mg/m2. Partial response was observed for one patient with biliary tract cancer (BTC) at the 12 mg/m2 dose, and disease control was achieved by 3 of 6 patients at the 12 mg/m2 and 25 mg/m2 dose levels. Based on these results, we recommend a phase II dose of 25 mg/m2. The disease control rate for BTC was 60%. Two patients with grade 3 liver dysfunction had the rapid N-acetyltransferase 2 phenotype, and disease control was more common for the non-rapid phenotype (50% vs. 12.5%). It appears that JPH203 was well-tolerated and provided promising activity against BTC. The N-acetyltransferase 2 phenotype might help predict the safety and efficacy of JPH203. Clinical trial registration: UMIN000016546.

Background The development of novel antitumor agents and accompanying biomarkers has improved survival across several tumor types. Previously, we published provisional clinical opinion for the diagnosis and use of immunotherapy in patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair tumors. Recently, efficacy of tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors against neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusion gene-positive advanced solid tumors have been established as the second tumor-agnostic treatment, making it necessary to develop the guideline prioritized for these patients. Methods Clinical questions regarding medical care were formulated for patients with NTRK-positive advanced solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched by PubMed and Cochrane Database. Critical publications and conference reports were added manually. Systematic reviews were performed for each clinical question for the purpose of developing clinical recommendations. The committee members identified by Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) and Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other related factors. Thereafter, a peer review by experts nominated from JSCO, JSMO, and Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, and the public comments among all Societies’ members was done. Results The current guideline describes 3 clinical questions and 15 recommendations for whom, when, and how NTRK fusion should be tested, and what is recommended for patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors. Conclusion In the NTRK guideline, the committee proposed 15 recommendations for performing NTRK testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors.

348 Background: CapeOX is a standard regimen for treating advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, limited data are available for its use in the elderly patients. Geriatric assessment (GA) assessment is also considered important other than the age. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CapeOX as a first-line therapy for AGC in elderly patients. We performed GA assessments using the G8, and the MINI-COG. Methods: The inclusion criteria were: HER2-negative or unknown status, age 70 years or older, PS 0 or 1, no history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and an evaluable lesion based on the RECIST v1.1 guidelines. The initial treatment plan consisted of capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2, b.i.d., on days 1–14), and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, on day 1) every three weeks. After the initial feasibility assessment, the treatment plan was modified and consisted of capecitabine (750 mg/m2, b.i.d., on days 1–14) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2, on day 1) every three weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). G8 assessments were performed before the beginning of the treatment, every three months after the start of the treatment, and at the end of the treatment. MINI-COG assessments were performed before the beginning of the treatment, and at the end of the treatment. Results: Between November 2016 and June 2020, 108 patients were enrolled, out of which 104 were evaluated. Thirty-nine patients received the initial treatment whereas sixty-five patients received the modified treatment. The primary endpoint was met. The median OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) were 12.9 (95% CI: 11.7–14.8), 5.8 (95% CI: 5.1–7.1), and 4.3 (95% CI: 3.9–5.7) months, respectively, for all patients. The median OS, PFS, and TTF for the initial treatment plan were 13.4 (95% CI: 9.6–16.0), 5.8 (95% CI: 4.1–7.9), and 5.3 (95% CI: 3.5–7.3) months, respectively, and for the modified treatment plan were 12.8 (95% CI: 11.3–15.3), 5.7 (95% CI: 4.4–7.0), and 4.2 (95% CI: 3.7–5.7) months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities in the initial treatment plan patients were neutropenia (17.9%), anemia (12.8%), thrombocytopenia (12.8%), anorexia (10.3%), and nausea (10.3%) and in the modified treatment plan patients were (13.8%) and anorexia (12.3%). Mean G8 score was 11.4 before the treatment, 13.4 during the treatment and 11.6 at the end of the treatment. Mean MINI-COG score was 4.0 before the treatment, and 4.1 at the end of the treatment and the positive screen for dementia was 13.5% before the treatment and 11.4% at the end of the treatment. Conclusions: Our results show that the modified treatment plan is favorable for the elderly patients with gastric cancer based on the OS and the toxicities. Clinical trial information: 000022450 .

In July 2019, in accordance with the Medical Information Distribution Service Manual for Guideline Development 2014, which was based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) and the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on chemotherapy and other drug therapies for older patients with cancer (JSMO-JSCO CPGs). In September 2020, at one year after the publication of these guidelines, a survey was conducted to determine the extent to which they had been disseminated to JSMO and JSCO members and implemented in daily practice.This nationwide, cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted with JSMO and JSCO members. We surveyed the participants' overall awareness of the JSMO-JSCO CPGs, and their knowledge about, attitudes toward, and perceived barriers to adherence to each recommendation using validated questionnaires based on theoretical frameworks used in previous studies (Awareness to Adherence Model, Clinicians' Assessments of Practice Guidelines in Oncology questionnaires, and Knowledge-Attitudes-Behavior Framework).Among JSMO and JSCO members who had been informed of the survey, 1230 responded (response rate: 8.6% and 4.8%, respectively). From these respondents, 107 were excluded because they did not practice anticancer drug therapy at the time of the survey. Of the remaining 1123 eligible participants, 674 (60.0%) were aware of the JSMO-JSCO CPGs before the survey, 492 (73.0%) of whom had read all or part of the guidelines (publications 57.1%, JSMO website 34.8%, and JSCO website 14.0%). Knowledge about, attitudes toward, and barriers to adherence to each recommendation differed widely according to the clinical questions. The most commonly cited barriers were lack of awareness, lack of agreement, lack of evidence, lack of outcome expectancy, patient values and preferences, and patient factors.This survey identified different barriers to guideline adherence, including providers' knowledge, attitudes, and external factors, depending on each recommendation. Effective strategies to overcome these barriers can be expected to improve the implementation of the guideline recommendations. Based on the results of this survey, efforts should be made to promote further the use of the clinical guidelines in daily practice.

Aflibercept plus 5‐fluorouracil/levofolinate/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) is a second‐line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. This ancillary exploratory analysis of data in Japanese people was aimed at exploring the relationship between a set of potential prognostic biomarkers and efficacy endpoints following aflibercept plus FOLFIRI therapy. Sixty‐two patients with metastatic colorectal cancer received aflibercept (4 mg/kg) plus FOLFIRI every 2 weeks. Seventy‐eight potential protein biomarkers were chosen for analysis based on their roles in angiogenesis, tumor progression, and tumor‐stroma interaction. Plasma levels of biomarkers at baseline and at pre‐dose 3 (day 1 of treatment cycle 3) were measured in all patients by ELISA. Relationships between these levels and efficacy endpoints were assessed. Ten potential biomarkers had a ±30% change from baseline to pre‐dose 3 (adjusted P

The Japan Clinical Oncology Group established a policy for geriatric oncology research suggesting several solutions for various issues which commonly occur in geriatric research., Due to the rapid aging of Japan’s population, clinical research focusing on older patients with cancer is urgently needed. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) has conducted several such clinical trials, but there has been no formal policy for geriatric research. We have therefore established a JCOG policy for geriatric cancer research. We defined the patient selection policy based on treatment tolerance and chronological age. Older patients are categorized into three conceptual groups: ‘fit patients’ who can undergo the same standard treatment given to younger patients, ‘frail patients’ for whom best supportive or palliative care is indicated and ‘vulnerable patients’ who fall between the fit and frail categories. Unmet needs often exist for vulnerable patients. The policy recommends that study endpoints include not only survival but also other endpoints such as physical and cognitive function because the objective of therapy in older patients is not only extended life expectancy but also maintenance of the patient’s general condition. In this viewpoint, co-primary or composite endpoints that incorporate geriatric assessment in the study design are often applicable. Study design will differ depending on the study population, clinical question, and treatment. Even for older patients, a randomized clinical trial is still the gold standard when the clinical question asks which treatment is better. An observational study of a broader population is applicable for investigating actual conditions of older patients. This JCOG Geriatric Research Policy includes several practical solutions for various issues in geriatric research. We plan to revise this policy periodically to guide future geriatric research.

Aflibercept targets vascular endothelial growth factor. The present study involved assessing the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of aflibercept plus 5-fluorouracil/levofolinate/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as a second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Japanese patients. Aflibercept (4 mg/kg) plus FOLFIRI was administered every 2 weeks in 62 patients with mCRC until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient withdrawal. Tumors were imaged every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics of aflibercept, irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil. A total of 60 patients were evaluated for ORR; 50 had received prior bevacizumab. The ORR was 8.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3%-15.3%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 80.0% (69.9%-90.1%). The median progression-free survival was 5.42 months (4.14-6.70 months) and the median overall survival was 15.59 months (11.20-19.81 months). No treatment-related deaths were observed, and no significant drug-drug interactions were found. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia and decreased appetite. Free aflibercept had a mean maximum concentration (coefficient of variation) of 73.2 μg/mL (15%), clearance of 0.805 L/d (22%) and volume of distribution of 6.2 L (18%); aflibercept bound with vascular endothelial growth factor had a clearance of 0.162 L/d (9%) (N = 62). Aflibercept did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan or 5-fluorouracil: The clearance was 11.1 L/h/m2 (28%) for irinotecan and, at steady state, 72.6 L/h/m2 (56%) for 5-fluorouracil (N = 10). Adding aflibercept to FOLFIRI was shown to be beneficial and well-tolerated in Japanese patients with mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01882868.

Purpose Patients with RAS-positive tumors respond poorly to chemotherapies and have a few treatment options. Salirasib is an oral RAS inhibitor that competitively blocks the membrane association of RAS proteins. The aim of this phase I multiple-ascending-dose clinical trial was to investigate the safety and pharmacokinetics of Salirasib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors and to explore its efficacy. Methods Salirasib was started at a dose of 100-mg twice-daily and escalated to a maximum of 1000-mg twice-daily from days 1 to 21 of a 28-day regimen. The pharmacokinetics was evaluated on days 1 and 21. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the trial. Patients with stable disease or better repeated the dosing regimen. Results A total of 21 patients received Salirasib. Among 14 patients tested, 4 had KRAS mutations. Cmax and AUCinf were maximal at 800 mg. No maximum tolerable dose was discerned, as no DLT was observed in any dosing group. The most frequently observed AEs were gastrointestinal disturbances, including diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea. No AEs led to discontinuation. All patients completed the first regimen and 11 patients repeated the regimen (median: 2 cycles; range: 1–13). Patients with KRAS mutations showed median progression-free survival of 227 days (range: 79–373). Conclusion Salirasib was safe and well tolerated in Japanese patients, and 800-mg twice-daily is recommended for phase II trials. Although the number of participants with KRAS mutations was limited, the remarkably long progression-free period warrants further investigation. Clinical trial registration JAPIC Clinical Trials Information; JapicCTI-121751. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-018-3618-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Ramucirumab, a monoclonal antibody vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antagonist, given as monotherapy improved survival in a global phase 3 study (REGARD) of patients with gastric cancer. However, REGARD did not include Japanese patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer. This multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized phase 2 study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01983878) was performed at 16 Japanese sites. Patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer after disease progression following first-line chemotherapy received intravenous ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Primary efficacy outcome: 12-week progression-free survival rate (PFS). Thirty-six patients were enrolled. The 12-week PFS rate was 23.8% [90% confidence interval (CI) 12.4–37.2); the primary outcome was not met as the lower limit of the CI was outside the threshold of 16%. Median PFS was 6.6 weeks (90% CI 6.1–7.1). No patients achieved an objective response, and 11 (31%) patients achieved disease control. Median overall survival was 8.6 months (90% CI 5.7–10.7). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea (9/36; 25%) and decreased appetite (8/36; 22%). Three patients reported Grade ≥ 3 ileus; all other Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported by ≤ 2 patients. The most frequent adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were hypertension (10/36; 28%), bleeding/hemorrhage (7/36; 19%), and proteinuria (7/36; 19%). All Grade ≥ 3 AESIs were reported by ≤ 2 patients. These findings suggest that ramucirumab monotherapy has clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with gastric cancer after disease progression following first-line chemotherapy.

Lessons Learned Axitinib exhibited marginal activity against gemcitabine-refractory unselected biliary tract cancer. Pretreated soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 may be a useful biomarker for axitinib treatment outcome. Ascites should be carefully monitored in patients receiving anti–vascular endothelial growth factor receptor therapy including axitinib in advanced biliary tract cancer. Background There are no clear options for second-line treatment in patients with gemcitabine (GEM)-refractory biliary tract cancer (BTC). We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of axitinib, a potent selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1/2/3, in patients with GEM-refractory BTC. Methods Patients refractory or intolerant to GEM-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Axitinib was administered orally at an initial dose of 5 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the threshold and expected values were set at 2 and 3 months, respectively. The target sample size was 32 patients. Results Nineteen patients were enrolled. The trial was interrupted for a total of 13 months for the evaluation of adverse events. Thirteen patients were previously treated with ≥2 regimens. The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1–4.1). The median overall survival was 5.8 months (95% CI: 3.3–9.7). The response rate was 5.3% (95% CI: 0.0–15.3). Grade 3 ascites occurred in two patients. Baseline soluble VEGFR-2 levels were significantly associated with PFS. Conclusion Axitinib exhibited marginal activity against GEM-refractory BTC. Ascites should be carefully monitored in axitinib-treated patients with advanced BTC.

Background No standard second-line chemotherapy has been yet established for gemcitabine-refractory biliary tract cancer (BTC). Patients and methods We conducted multivariable Cox regression analysis to examine the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients who had received gemcitabine-based treatment. Results Forty-six patients received second-line chemotherapy. The median serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) value was 487 U/ml. The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) was: 0 (n=24), 1 (n=10), or 2 (n=10). The second-line chemotherapy included: S-1 in 20 patients, gemcitabine-based in 20, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in five. The median OS was 8.3 months, and the median progression-free survival was 3.0 months. Multivariate analysis identified serum CA 19-9 ≥500 U/ml, mGPS ≥1, and presence of liver metastasis as significant prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion Second-line chemotherapy for gemcitabine-refractory BTC remains inadequate. Randomized trials with appropriate stratification criteria are required.

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients previously treated for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in Japanese and Western subgroups from the RAINBOW trial.Patients received ramucirumab at 8 mg/kg or placebo (days 1 and 15) plus paclitaxel at 80 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle). End points were compared between treatment arms within Japanese (N = 140) and Western (N = 398) populations.The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was higher for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in both populations (Japanese population, 83.8 % vs 52.1 %; Western population, 79.1 % vs 61.9 %). Neutropenia was the commonest adverse event of grade 3 or higher, with a higher incidence for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (Japanese population, 66.2 % vs 25.4 %; Western population, 32.1 % vs 14.7 %). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was low and was similar between treatment arms in both populations. The overall survival hazard ratio was 0.88 (95 % confidence interval, 0.60-1.28) in the Japanese population and 0.73 (95 % confidence interval, 0.58-0.91) in the Western population. The progression-free survival hazard ratio was 0.50 (95 % confidence interval, 0.35-0.73) in the Japanese population and 0.63 (95 % confidence interval, 0.51-0.79) in the Western population. The objective response rate was higher for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in both populations (Japanese population, 41.2 % vs 19.4 %; Western population, 26.8 % vs 13.0 %), as was the 6-month survival rate (Japanese population, 94.1 % vs 71.4 %; Western population, 66.0 % vs 49.0 %).Safety profiles of the ramucirumab plus paclitaxel arm were similar between populations, though there was a higher incidence of neutropenia in Japanese patients. Progression-free survival and objective response rate improvements were observed for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in both populations. CLINICALTRIALS.NCT01170663.

Background Trametinib is an inhibitor of MEK1/MEK2 activation and kinase activity. In order to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of single-agent trametinib (part 1) and trametinib in combination with gemcitabine (part 2), we undertook the first clinical study of this combination in Japanese patients with cancer and herein report our results. Methods In part 1, 13 patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled into 3 dose cohorts, receiving trametinib once daily at a dose of 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 mg. In part 2, 5 patients with pancreatic cancer received trametinib (2.0 mg once daily) in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2). Results In part 1, a dose-limiting toxicity was observed in a patient in the 2.0-mg dose cohort, but the maximum tolerated dose was not reached at doses up to 3.0 mg daily. The best overall response was a PR in 1 patient, and 6 patients had SD. In part 2, the combination of trametinib and gemcitabine was tolerated for a short period of time. However, serious interstitial lung disease (ILD) was observed in 3 of 5 patients 4 weeks or more after the start of the treatment, including 1 fatal case. Three patients achieved a PR, and 2 patients had SD. The most common adverse event was rash (85 % in part 1 and 100 % in part 2). Conclusions Trametinib monotherapy was tolerable in Japanese patients with cancer. However, the combination of trametinib plus gemcitabine carried a higher risk as compared with monotherapy, during which no ILD was observed. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01324258.)

Background/aim Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) has been identified as a treatment target for biliary tract cancer (BTC) and axitinib is a selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1/2/3. This study was conducted as a preliminary evaluation of the safety and efficacy of axitinib for patients with advanced BTC. Patients and methods Patients refractory to gemcitabine-based regimens were administered axitinib at the dose of 5 mg twice daily. Results Five patients (3 male and 2 female) with a median age of 68 years were enrolled. Although 3 patients developed treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), none of these patients required discontinuation of the protocol treatment due to the AEs. Partial response (PR) was achieved in 1 patient, with a 67% reduction. The response was classified as stable disease (SD) in 3 patients and as progressive disease (PD) in 1 patient. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 2.0 to 19.9 months and 1.5 to 7.4 months, respectively. Conclusion This preliminary study suggested that axitinib is well-tolerated and might exert promising activity in patients with BTC.

A phase 1 study of pazopanib alone or in combination with lapatinib was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of these oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Japanese patients with solid tumors.In part A (monotherapy), 7 patients initially received pazopanib 800 mg/day, the recommended dose for non-Japanese patients. Then, 3 patients received pazopanib 400 mg/day on day 1 followed by 800 mg/day from day 2 onward. Three other patients received pazopanib 1,000 mg/day. In part B (combination therapy), 17 patients received pazopanib plus lapatinib (pazopanib/lapatinib) at once-daily doses of 400/1,000 mg (4 patients), 800/1,000 mg (3 patients), 400/1,500 mg (3 patients), and then 600/1,250 mg (7 patients).There was no dose-limiting toxicity during the study. In part A, most drug-related adverse events were grade 2 or lower, including neutropenia/neutrophil count decreased, thrombocytopenia/platelet count decreased, diarrhea, hypertension, aspartate aminotransferase increased, and lipase increased. In part B, rash, decreased appetite, and serum thyroid-stimulating hormone increased also occurred. In all dose groups, the plasma concentrations after multiple doses of pazopanib exceeded the target trough concentration for inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 activity (20 μg/mL).The pharmacokinetic profiles of pazopanib and lapatinib in Japanese patients were not apparently different from those reported in non-Japanese patients. There were no consistent trends in pharmacokinetic drug interactions between pazopanib and lapatinib. Pazopanib monotherapy at 800 and 1,000 mg once daily and pazopanib plus lapatinib once daily at any doses studied were well tolerated in Japanese patients.

Background Gemcitabine (GEM) plus cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy has been used worldwide as the standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). A phase II trial has also suggested promising activity of GEM plus S-1 chemotherapy against advanced BTC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GEM plus S-1 chemotherapy in patients with advanced BTC. Patients and methods The eligibility criteria were as follows: histologically-proven BTC, unresectable or recurrent disease, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-1 regardless of previous treatment. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously at the dose of 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 min on days 1 and 8, and S-1 was administered orally at doses of 60/80/100 mg/day based on the BSA, from day 1 to day 14, every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the response rate according to RECIST, ver. 1.1, and the secondary endpoints were the frequency/severity of toxicities, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 38 patients were enrolled between August 2008 and November 2011. There were 19 men and 19 women, with a median age of 66 years (range=44-81 years). Seven patients had a previous history of first-line or adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The PS was 0 and 1 in 30 and 7 patients, respectively. The treatment response was classified as partial response in 6 patients (15.8%) and as stable disease in 18 patients (47.4%). The median PFS and OS were 5.8 and 15.9 months, respectively. The toxicity was generally mild, and the most common grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia (31.6%), neutropenia (36.8%), nausea/vomiting (2.6%), and diarrhea (2.6%). There was one treatment-related death due to interstitial pneumonia. Conclusion Our study revealed that gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy was well-tolerated and exhibited favorable antitumor activity in patients with advanced BTC.

TPS1100 Background: Systemic chemotherapy with anti-HER2 therapy is the standard of care for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Patient outcomes have improved remarkably with the use of novel anti-HER2 drugs, including trastuzumab (H), pertuzumab (P), and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). The combination treatment comprising H, P, and docetaxel (D) (HPD) is highly recommended as the 1st-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. In contrast, for elderly patients over 65 years of age, this regimen seems to be intolerable mentally and physically, and impairs their quality of life. A new standard treatment with less toxicity and non-inferior efficacy for elderly patients is needed. Methods: We have planned a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial to confirm the non-inferiority of T-DM1 compared to HPD in terms of overall survival (OS) in elderly patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. The eligibility criteria are as follows: 1) histologically proven metastatic breast cancer, 2) age 65-74 years with a performance status (PS) score 0-2, or 75-79 years with a PS score 0-1, 3) HER2 overexpression or amplification confirmed in primary or metastatic tissues, and 4) no anti-HER2 therapy with chemotherapy for breast cancer, excluding (neo) adjuvant therapy. Patients are randomized to receive either HPD (H 6 mg/kg, P 420 mg/body, and D 60 mg/m2) or T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The dose up of D (75 mg/m2) after the second cycle is defined based on the data regarding safety during the first cycle. The primary endpoint is OS. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, response rate, adverse events, breast cancer-related death, and deterioration of activities of daily living. The trial is designed to achieve 70% power to confirm non-inferiority of T-DM1 to HPD at a one-sided alpha of 5% with a non-inferiority margin of 1.3 in terms of hazard ratio. With a median OS of 30 months in both arms, 6 years of accrual, and 5 years of follow up, the planned sample size is 330. The trial began in January 2018 and nineteen patients have been enrolled as of January 2019. Clinical trial information: UMIN000030783.

e15106 Background: Tumor mismatch repair (MMR) predicts benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We conducted a large-scale prospective observational trial on microsatellite instability (MSI) status in mCRC: SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN CRC-MSI. Methods: mCRC patients (pts) appropriate for systemic chemotherapy were eligible. Paired tumor and normal DNA extracted from FFPE samples were analyzed by the MSI Analysis System, which includes 5 mononucleotide markers. Tumors exhibiting ≥2 unstable markers were defined as MSI-H, while those with ≤1 were labelled MSI-L/MSS. Results: From 2/2016 to 3/2018, 1,711 pts were enrolled, and 1,696 samples were submitted. MSI status was determined in 1,676 pts (98.8%); 51 pts (3.0%) were MSI-H. For MSI-H vs. MSI-L/MSS pts: Median age (years) 64/64; male gender (%) 51.0 vs. 43.8, p=0.31; right-sided primary (%) 70.6 vs. 25.0, p20 mt/Mb, was observed in 27/29 (93.1%) MSI-H pts. The frequency of representative gene mutations (%) for MSI-H vs. MSI-L/MSS pts were: TP53 17.2 vs. 66.1, p

The safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib in Japanese patients was assessed in this multicenter, single-arm, phase I trial. Fifteen patients with treatment-refractory advanced solid tumors received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or investigator or patient decision to stop. The median duration of treatment was 2.1 months (range, 0.9–20.1 months). At data cutoff, one patient was still receiving regorafenib in cycle 21. Reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression (n = 12) and adverse events (liver enzyme elevation n = 1; anemia n = 1). Adverse events necessitated dose reduction in six patients, interruption of daily treatment in seven patients, and cycle delay in four patients. All patients experienced at least one drug-related adverse event, particularly gastrointestinal (87 %), dermatologic (73 %), or hematologic (67 %) events. There was no significant change in time to maximum concentration or terminal half-life of regorafenib and its active metabolites M2 and M5 between single dosing and 21-day continuous dosing. The area under the concentration–time curve was 2.1-fold higher for regorafenib, 5.2-fold higher for M2, and 37.3-fold higher for M5, and the maximum concentration was 2.0-fold, 4.8-fold, and 36.0-fold higher, respectively, after continuous dosing than after single dosing. One patient had a partial response (duration 10.5 months) and seven patients had stable disease. This study indicates that regorafenib 160 mg orally once daily (21 days on/7 days off treatment) can be given to Japanese patients who have solid tumors, without undue toxicity.

Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) is a serious neurologic disease characterized by visual disturbance, seizures, headache, and altered mental status associated with white matter changes, particularly in the occipital lobes. RPLS has been attributed to chemotherapy, including modified FOLFOX6 regimens consisting of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin. Although the mechanism of development of RPLS remains unclear, impaired cerebral blood flow autoregulation and endothelial dysfunction seem to be involved. In particular, endothelial dysfunction has been implicated in the pathophysiology of RPLS associated with platinum agents. Platinum-based chemotherapy is thought to have a direct toxic effect on the vascular endothelium, leading to capillary leakage, disruption of the blood–brain barrier, and axonal swelling, triggering vasogenic edema. Much progress has been made in chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, and the increasing use of molecular-targeted agents is expected to further improve the outcome of therapy. RPLS has recently been associated with such molecular-targeted therapy, particularly in patients concurrently receiving platinum agents. This finding is consistent with previous reports suggesting that RPLS occurs more often in patients receiving platinum-based therapy than in those receiving molecular-targeted agents. Because platinum agents are the most widely used in cancer chemotherapy, clinicians should strongly suspect RPLS in patients receiving treatment with this class of drug.

The purpose of chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, including biliary tract cancer, is generally to improve the survival and quality of life of the patients. Also, adjuvant chemotherapy is expected to increase the curability of surgery in patients scheduled to undergo surgery. Most patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer develop obstructive jaundice, and biliary drainage is needed before any of the aforementioned treatments. Once jaundice is resolved by stenting of the bile duct or bilio-intestinal bypass, cholangitis often develops, leading to rapid deterioration of the patient's general condition. Therefore, the beneficial effect of chemotherapy in such patients remains controversial. A few randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the survival benefit of chemotherapy as compared with supportive care. In one of these trials, improvement of the quality of life was also confirmed. Recently, since the survival benefit of combined gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy over gemcitabine alone has been demonstrated in randomized controlled clinical trials, this combined regimen has been recognized as a standard therapy for unresectable biliary tract cancer. A second-line regimen is now expected to be established for patients with gemcitabine-refractory biliary tract cancer, although the significance of second-line therapy remains unclear. One of the next issues in relation to chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer is the development of molecular-targeted agents; however, few large clinical trials of such agents have been conducted for biliary tract cancer. Various issues in chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer remain to be investigated, and global cooperation is necessary to conduct large clinical trials.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: This phase I dose-finding study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD) or both of FOLFOXIRI. Patients with UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*6/*6, *28/*28 and *6/*28 genotypes were excluded, because these UGT1A1 genotypes are linked to severe neutropenia in Japanese. Results: A total of 10 Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer were studied. The MTD of FOLFOXIRI in these Japanese patients was 165 mg/m2 irinotecan, 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin and 2,400 mg/m2 5-FU. Accordingly, the RD of FOLFOXIRI was determined to be 150 mg/m2 irinotecan, 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin and 2,400 mg/m2 5-FU. Toxic effects, evaluated until the completion of 4 cycles, were manageable. Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 27% of cycles, but there was no febrile neutropenia. Among the 9 assessable patients, the objective response rate was 89%. Conclusions: We thus determined the RD of FOLFOXIRI in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer who do not have UGT1A1*28/*28, *6/*6 or *6/*28 genotypes. Our results indicate that FOLFOXIRI is a well-tolerated regimen for these Japanese patients.

Objective: This phase I/II study determined the recommended dose of FOLFIRI (irinotecan, infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin) for Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer, and evaluated safety at the recommended dose in patients without the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*28 allele which caused reduced enzyme expression. Methods: The phase I part assessed the maximum tolerated dose of FOLFIRI to determine the recommended doses of irinotecan and infusional 5-fluorouracil. The doses were escalated from 150 to 180 mg/m 2 (irinotecan) and 2000 to 2400 mg/m 2 (5-fluorouracil). UDPglucuronosyltransferase 1A1*6 and *28, and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan were observationally examined. In the phase II part, patients without the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*28 allele received FOLFIRI at the recommended dose to evaluate safety. Results: Among 15 patients in the phase I part, dose-limiting toxicity (diarrhea) occurred in one patient who received 150 mg/m 2 irinotecan and 2400 mg/m 2 infusional 5-fluorouracil. The respective recommended doses were 180 and 2400 mg/m 2 for irinotecan and infusional 5-fluorouracil, without reaching the maximum tolerated dose. Twenty-five patients received FOLFIRI at the recommended doses. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 44%, and Grade 3 diarrhea in 4%. Conclusions: This phase I/II study demonstrates that the recommended doses of irinotecan and infusional 5-fluorouracil in FOLFIRI for Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer who do not possess the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*28 allele are 180 and 2400 mg/m 2 , respectively. Toxicities occurring at the recommended doses are manageable in

Differences in efficacy and toxicity between UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*1/*1 and *1/*6 or *1/*28 genotypes remain unclear in Japanese patients. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer who received irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil plus l-leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line therapy were divided into two groups: those with UGT1A1*1/*1 genotype and those with UGT1A1*1/*6 or *1/*28 genotype. Efficacy and toxicity were compared between these groups retrospectively. Forty-two patients (24 *1/*1 and 18 *1/*6 or *1/*28) were evaluated. The response rate was 48% in *1/*1 group and 56% in *1/*6 or *1/*28 group (P = 0.847). Median progression-free survival was 8.6 months in *1/*1 group and 8.5 months in *1/*6 or *1/*28 group (P = 0.888). No hematologic or non-hematologic toxic effects were clearly related to UGT1A1*1/*6 or *1/*28 during the first cycle or throughout the entire course of chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in the efficacy or toxicity of FOLFIRI between patients with UGT1A1*1/*1 genotype and those with UGT1A1*1/*6 or *1/*28 genotype. Our results suggest that patients with the latter genotypes can receive FOLFIRI at the same dose of irinotecan as those with the UGT1A1*1/*1 genotype receive.

2519Background: The uptake of amino acids is essential for cancer growth. The L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) is overexpressed in various cancers, and the LAT1-mediated uptake of plasma-free...

419 Background: Uptake of amino acids is essential for cancer growth. L-type amino acid transporter-1 (LAT-1) is overexpressed in various cancers, and uptake of LAT-1 substrate amino acids is known to have a critical role in cancer growth. JPH203 is a novel, selective, LAT-1 inhibitor. A first-in-human phase I study of JPH203 was designed to determine the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose. This study included evaluation of the anti-tumor effect, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of JPH203 and analyzed plasma free amino acids. Methods: JPH203 was administered intravenously for 7 days followed by 21 days’ rest at planned doses ranging from 12 to 110 mg/m2 in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy. Before starting this schedule, we confirmed safety of a single dose of JPH203. Dose-limiting toxicity was evaluated during the first cycle, using a 3+3 design. Results: 17 patients were enrolled from January 2015 to August 2016. One patient was discontinued after a single dose of JPH203 because of tumor progression. Dosage was escalated up to 85 mg/m2. Grade 3 liver dysfunction occurred in 1 of 6 patients at 60 mg/m2 and in the first patient at 85 mg/m2. Therefore, it was determined that MTD was 60 mg/m2. Common treatment-related adverse events were increased ALT/AST, malaise, nausea, hypertension and fever of Grade 1 or 2. Partial response was achieved in a patient with biliary tract cancer (BTC) who continued JPH203 for two years without progression. Disease control (PR+SD) was observed in 3 of 5 patients with BTC and 2 of 6 with colorectal cancer. LAT-1 substrate amino acids and branched chain amino acids including LAT-1 substrate amino acids were higher in patients with BTC than in those with other cancers. All patients with disease control had a body mass index more than the median of 20.5 kg/m2. In exploratory analysis, longer survival was achieved in patients with high inhibition of uptake of LAT-1 substrate amino acids, compared with patients with low inhibition of uptake. Conclusions: JPH203 was well tolerated, resulting in promise against BTC. This phase I study suggested that LAT-1 could be targeted in treatment for advanced BTC, because LAT-1 substrate amino acids in plasma tended to remain high. Clinical trial information: UMIN000016546.

To investigate the effects of genetic polymorphisms on morphine-induced adverse events in cancer patients. We examined the relation of morphine-related adverse events to polymorphisms in UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B7, ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B, number 1 (ABCB1), and μ-opioid receptor 1 genes in 32 Japanese cancer patients receiving oral controlled-release morphine sulfate tablets. The T/T genotype at 1236 or TT/TT diplotype at 2677 and 3435 in ABCB1 was associated with significantly lower frequency of fatigue (grades 1–3) (P = 0.012 or 0.011, Fisher’s exact test). The UGT2B7*2 genotype was associated with the frequency of nausea (grades 1–3) (P = 0.023). The frequency of nausea was higher in patients without UGT2B7*2 allele than others. The diplotype at 2677 and 3435 in ABCB1 was associated with the frequency of vomiting (grades 1–3) (P = 0.011). No patient whose diplotype was consisted of no GC allele at 2677 and 3435 suffered from vomiting. Our findings suggest that pharmacogenetics can be used to predict the risk of morphine-induced adverse events.

Purpose: Recently, an objective response rate of 12% was reported in a phase II study of cetuximab in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy (IMC-0144). In this large molecular correlates study, we tested whether K-ras mutation status and polymorphisms in genes involved in the EGFR-signaling pathway were associated with clinical outcome in IMC-0144.Experimental Design: We analyzed all available tissue samples from 130 of 346 mCRC patients enrolled in the IMC-0144 phase II clinical trial of cetuximab. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues, and K-ras mutation status and the genotypes were analyzed using PCR-RFLP, direct DNA-sequencing, and 5′-end [γ-33P] ATP–labeled PCR-protocols.Results: The PFS of patients with cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) −765 G>C [C/C; risk ratio (RR), 0.31; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.12-0.84; P = 0.032], COX-2 +8473 T>C (C/C; RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.40-1.13; P = 0.003), EGF +61 A>G (G/G; RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = 0.042), and EGFR +497 G>A (A/G; RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.56-1.20; P = 0.017) genotypes was significantly longer compared with those with other genotypes. In addition, patients whose tumors did not have K-ras mutations showed better RR, PFS, and overall survival than patients with K-ras mutations. In multivariable analysis, COX-2 +8473 T>C (adjusted P = 0.013) and EGFR +497 G>A (adjusted P = 0.010) remained significantly associated with progression-free survival, independent of skin rash toxicity, K-ras mutation status, and Eastern Cooperative Group performance status.Conclusions: Polymorphisms in COX-2 and EGFR may be useful independent molecular markers to predict clinical outcome in patients with mCRC treated with single-agent cetuximab, independent of skin rash toxicity, K-ras mutation, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

ATP-binding cassette, sub-family C, number 2 (ABCC2) is involved in the biliary excretion of irinotecan and its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide. Effects of the ABCC2 genotype on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of irinotecan and the metabolites were examined in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI). ABCC2 genotypes (-1549G>A, -1023G>A, -1019A>G, -24C>T, 1249G>A and 3972C>T) and haplotypes were analyzed for 67 patients with cancer. PK was also examined in a subset of 31 patients receiving FOLFIRI. Relationship between the ABCC2 genotypes or diplotypes and area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) of irinotecan and the metabolites normalized by irinotecan dose was analyzed. The lower AUC of irinotecan was seen in patients with A/A or G/A genotypes at 1249 of the ABCC2 gene than others (p=0.011, Mann-Whitney U teat). AUC of SN-38 in patients with A/A or G/A genotypes at -1023 was significantly lower than that in others (p=0.018). The haplotype I included -1023A (GAACGC) was the most frequent one with the allele frequency of 0.366. The AUC of SN-38 observed in patients with diplotypes harboring at least one haplotype I was lower than that observed in others (p=0.023). The haplotype IV consisted of 1249 (GGACAC) and was the fourth most frequent one with the allele frequency of 0.127. Patients with diplotypes carrying at least one haplotype IV showed lower AUC of irinotecan than others (p=0.011). Thus, ABCC2 genotype is one of the predictors of the variability of irinotecan PK in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving FOLFIRI.

Background: We have reported that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in gastric cancers might be a selective marker between 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and a combination of 5-FU plus cisplatin (CDDP). In this study, the relationship between VEGF expression and effects of S-1 with and without CDDP is investigated. Methods: The subjects were 44 patients treated with S-1 (40 mg/m 2 , twice daily, days 1‐28, repeated every 6 weeks) and 24 patients treated with S-1 plus CDDP (S-1 40 mg/m 2 ,t wice daily, days 1‐21, CDDP, 60 or 70 mg/m 2 , day 8, repeated every 5 weeks). VEGF expression in pretreatment endoscopic biopsy samples was assessed immunohistochemically. Results: Median survival times (MST) of the patients treated with S-1 and S-1 plus CDDP were 344 and 388 days. Among evaluable patients, the response rates of patients with VEGF (þ )a nd (2) tumors to S-1 were 40% (6/15) and 54% (13/24), and to S-1 plus CDDP, 79% (15/19) and 80% (4/5). While the survival of patients with VEGF (2) tumors was slightly longer than those with VEGF (þ) tumors in the S-1 group (MST, 425 versus 308 days, P ¼ 0.42), patients with VEGF (þ) tumors survived remarkably longer than those with VEGF (2) tumors in the S-1 plus CDDP group (MST, 570 versus 333 days, P ¼ 0.19). Conclusion: Similarly to our previous study, it is suggested that the effects of adding CDDP to S-1 might be more remarkable in gastric cancer patients with VEGF (þ) tumors than in those with VEGF (2) tumors. These results should be confirmed in a large phase III study.

Objective There is little information about the patterns of care for elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients, and a standardized strategy has not been established. Therefore, we conducted a questionnaire survey about the patterns of care for these patients. Methods On September 2014, the questionnaires were sent to all 43 institutions of the Japan Esophageal Oncology Group, which comprised five parts: (i) definition of 'elderly' (age, method), (ii) basic treatment strategy according to stage and elderly status (fit/vulnerable/frail), (iii) patterns of care in each stage, (iv) considerations about conducting future clinical trials and (v) other information about geriatric oncology concerning esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Results All answers were obtained by January 2015. Nearly half institutions (47%) considered the chronological definition of elderly to be over 80 years old. Among 43 institutions, 36 (84%) reported that the type of comorbidity and performance status were important factors for decision-making; no institution selected geriatric scale as an indicator. The most selected treatment strategy in fit healthy elderly patients was the same as the standard treatment of non-elderly patients. Radiation alone was considered the main treatment for vulnerable and frail esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Most of the institutions answered that clinical trials for the elderly are warranted. Most institutions (70%) chose Stage II/III (non-T4) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma as an important investigational target. Conclusions Fit healthy elderly were considered the same as non-elderly patients, although there are no established treatment selection criteria. Radiation alone plays most important role in the treatment for vulnerable and frail esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Stage II/III (non-T4) disease is attractive and warranted for future investigations.

Pharmacogenetic testing for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*28, a promoter variant of the UGT1A1 gene, is now carried out clinically to estimate the risk of irinotecan-associated toxicity. We studied the clinical significance of UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*27, two variants in exon 1 of the UGT1A1 gene that are found mainly in Asians. The study group comprised 46 Japanese patients who received various regimens of chemotherapy including irinotecan at doses from 50 to 180 mg/m(2). Pharmacogenetic relationships were explored between the UGT1A1 genotype and the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN-38) to that of SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G), used as a surrogate for UGT1A1 activity (AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G)). No patient was homozygous for UGT1A1*28, and none had UGT1A1*27. Two were heterozygous for UGT1A1*28. Two were homozygous and 15 heterozygous for UGT1A1*6, all of whom were wild type with respect to UGT1A1*28. Two patients were simultaneously heterozygous for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6, present on different chromosomes. The other 25 patients had none of the variants studied. The two patients simultaneously heterozygous for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 and the two patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 had significantly higher AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G) ratios than the others (P = 0.0039). Concurrence of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6, even when heterozygous, altered the disposition of irinotecan remarkably, potentially increasing susceptibility to toxicity. Patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 should also be carefully monitored. UGT1A1 polymorphisms in the coding region of the UGT1A1 gene should be genotyped in addition to testing for UGT1A1*28 to more accurately predict irinotecan-related toxicity, at least in Asian patients.

A 60-year-old woman with non-small cell lung cancer was treated with gefitinib and developed acute pneumonitis on the third day. Pulmonary damage and/or interstitial lung disease (ILD) related to gefitinib was diagnosed clinically and radiographically. Despite the immediate withdrawal of gefitinib and the administration of high-dose steroid, the patient did not fully recover and finally died of respiratory failure on day 22 after gefitinib had commenced. This case cautions us that careful monitoring provides no guarantee of safeguarding patients against ILD caused by gefitinib. We should make the decision to treat patients with gefitinib very carefully until we can elucidate which patients are at high risk and which patients are likely to have a response to this drug.