Search

Therapeutic alternatives in advanced urothelial carcinoma are limited, especially in advanced lines, with only a few drugs having demonstrated relevant clinical benefit. This article discusses about a young patient with significant cardiovascular comorbidities, already treated with recommended first- and second-line drugs, and suffering from liver metastases. Despite the known poor prognosis of this disease and the few supporting data, given his peculiar clinical history, we opted to treat him with a third-line gemcitabine rechallenge with a notable response on his liver lesions. We present an intriguing case, both in terms of the therapeutic sequence and the disease course.

705 Background: mRCC prognostic stratification is currently based on the IMDC score. However, some patients experience outcomes markedly different from those predicted by the median outcome of their risk class. Moreover, risk scores are prognostic, rather than predictive, and developing reproducible, affordable, biology-based predictive biomarkers to tailor treatment choices in individual pts remains an unmet clinical need. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 113 mRCC pts treated at the Verona University Hospital Trust between 2013 and 2021 was explored to identify additional clinical prognostic factors for OS to complement IMDC score. Outlier pts (i.e. individual pts whose clinical outcome differed significantly from the median of the IMDC group they belonged to) were further explored to find putative molecular signatures, using FISH and IHC assays. Results: At a median follow-up of 69 months (range 18-136m), novel variables impacting on OS in addition to IMDC risk group were identified: bone, central nervous system (CNS) and pancreatic mets and high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (N/L) with a cut-off of 3.2. We also analyzed outliers: 3 good-risk pts with lower than expected OS, 4 poor-risk pts with longer than expected OS, and two intermediate-risk pts with long treatment response. Two putative signatures were found predictive of disease behavior: a cold signature (9p loss, poor of TILs) and a hot signature (rich in CD56+, CD15+ and CD8+ infiltrating cells). The cold and hot signatures were found in good risk pts with bad OS and poor-risk pts good OS, respectively; both intermediate-risk pts had a hot signature, consistent with their disease course. Conclusions: Additional clinical and molecular factors have been identified to possibly improve IMDC prognostic performance; multivariable models including them along with standard IMDC are being developed. Molecular analysis suggests potential signatures to be applied in routine clinical practice, whose predictive performance could be validated in prospective multicentric trials. [Table: see text]

De novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) is small subgroup of prostate cancer associated with poor prognosis. The aim of our study was to assess the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in tumor cells of de novo mCSPC patients. Patients referred to our institution from January 2007 to October 2017 with de novo mCSPC and available diagnostic tissue were included. We tested the PD-L1 pharmaDx qualitative immunohistochemical assay, a monoclonal rabbit anti-PD-L1, clone 28-8 intended for use in the detection of PD-L1 protein in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survivals according to the expression of PD-L1. The study population included 32 de novo mCSPC patients, analyzed for PD-L1 expression using 2 cut-off values (1% and 5%) to define the positivity. Total of 46.9% of cases had tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1%, and 31.3% had expression ≥5%. No differences were found between the PD-L1 expression ≥1% and the involvement of liver, lung, and number of bone metastases, and the disease volume based on CHAARTED classification. PD-L1 tumors had higher incidence of Gleason score ≥8 compared with PD-L1 tumors (P=0.037), while the incidence of lymph node metastases was higher in PD-L1 tumors (P=0.044). No difference in the median overall survival (mOS) was observed between the PD-L1 population and the PD-L1 patients (43.8 vs. 29.6 mo; P=0.88). The tumor PD-L1 expression cannot be considered a prognostic factor for de novo mCSPC, even if its prognostic and predictive significance have to be thoroughly investigated to better define the selected group of prostate cancer patients that might benefit from checkpoint blockade immunotherapy.

There is no second-line standard of care universally accepted for platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Immunotherapy and anti-VEGF(R) targeted therapies are 2 emerging strategies with promising though inconclusive results. We perform a systematic meta-analysis to assess the available options. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and American society of clinical oncology (ASCO) Meeting abstracts to identify prospective studies. Data extraction was conduced according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The measured outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Seven randomized controlled trials were selected for final analysis, with a total of 2,451 evaluable patients. Chemotherapy with vinflunine did not reduce the risk of progression (HR = 1.11; 95%CI 0.78-1.57; P = .56) or death (HR = 0.97; 95%CI 0.70-1.34; P = .87) compared to taxanes. Immunotherapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAb improved OS over chemotherapy (HR = 0.81; 95% CI 0.71-0.92; P.0009). The OS benefit of immunotherapy was retained when compared to taxanes, but not compared to vinflunine, although without a significant difference between the 2 subgroups (P = .30). A lack of PFS (HR = 0.73; P = .08) and OS (HR = 1.0; P = .99) benefit was observed with an anti-VEGF(R) plus chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone. No PFS (P = .14) or OS (P = .13) differences were detected when comparing anti-VEGF(R) ± chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Immunotherapy significantly improved OS compared to chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma unselected for PD-L1 status. The addition of anti-VEGF(R) to chemotherapy did not provide any statistically significant benefit in terms of PFS or OS. Single agent taxanes or vinflunine can be considered given their similar efficacy but different toxicity profiles.

Most common sites of metastasis of urothelial carcinoma (UC) are lungs, liver, lymph nodes and bone. Pembrolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), represents an effective second-line therapy for advanced UC. Radiotherapy has been shown to induce a mechanism of immunogenic cell death (ICD) resulting in immune memory and advantageous systemic effects. We present the first case of breast metastasis (BM) from a UC described in literature who had an exceptional response to second-line therapy with pembrolizumab in association with radiotherapy, showing the efficacy of combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy even in patients with atypical metastatic sites.

Metastatic prostate cancer is a poor prognosis condition that includes several different biological and clinical disease patterns. The cornerstone of treatment is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), given the strict dependence of this tumor on androgens. The natural history of metastatic prostate cancer is characterized by two stages, according to tumor sensibility to hormonal therapy: hormone-sensitive disease (metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)) and castration-resistant disease (metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)). Chemotherapy with taxanes (docetaxel and cabazitaxel), second-generation hormonal therapies (abiraterone and enzalutamide), and particle-emitting radionuclides (radium-223) represent different therapeutic options for metastatic disease.

The CHAARTED and LATITUDE trials demonstrated improved outcomes with docetaxel or abiraterone plus androgen deprivation therapy in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) using two different prognostic scores. The aim of our study was to assess the concordance between the two scores and if these retained their prognostic value exclusively in de novo mHSPC. De novo mHSPC patients referring to our institution were retrospectively stratified according to the CHAARTED and LATITUDE classifications: high volume/high risk (HV/HR), low-volume/low-risk (LV/LR), and HVorHR (HV/LR and LV/HR). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios for overall survival. The study population included 106 patients. Concordance between the CHAARTED and LATITUDE classifications was observed in 86.8% of cases (65.1% HV/HR, 21.7% LV/LR), while 13.2% of patients fulfill the criteria of only one of the two classifications (HVorHR). When analyzed independently, the CHAARTED and LATITUDE classifications maintained their prognostic value (mOS 28.2 months in HV versus 60.9 months in LV, p = 0.006; 28.2 months in HR versus 40.6 months in LR, p = 0.017). The LR/LV population showed significantly longer mOS compared to the HR/HV group (72.6 months versus 26.3 months; p = 0.005), and to HVorHR patients (35.1 months; p = 0.003). No difference in OS was observed between HV/HR and HVorHR patients. ECOG PS ≥ 1 and patient age improved the prognostic value of the two classifications with multivariate analysis. Our study showed a lack of complete concordance between the CHAARTED and LATITUDE classifications. The analysis confirmed the role of these prognostic scores to stratify de novo mHSPC patients in clinical practice.

Introduction The cardiovascular toxicity related to abiraterone and enzalutamide has been previously studied by our group. In this analysis, we aim to update our previous findings related to abiraterone and enzalutamide, including the new available evidence, both in castration-resistant and hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Patients and Methods Prospective studies were identified by searching the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ASCO Meeting abstracts. Combined relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects methods. Results We included 7 articles in this meta-analysis, covering a total of 8660 patients who were used to evaluate cardiovascular toxicity. The use of new hormonal agents was associated with an increased risk of all-grade (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.13-1.64; P = .001) and high-grade (RR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.21-2.80; P = .004) cardiac toxicity. The use of new hormonal agents was also associated with an increased risk of all-grade (RR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.62-2.43; P = .001) and high-grade (RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.84-2.77; P = .004) hypertension compared with the controls. Abiraterone was found to significantly increase the risk of both cardiac toxicity and hypertension, whereas enzalutamide significantly increases only the risk of hypertension. No differences were found based on the dose of prednisone used with abiraterone. The major limitation of this study is that data are available only as aggregate, and no single-patient information could be analyzed. Conclusions Abiraterone and enzalutamide significantly increase the incidence and RR of cardiovascular toxicity in patients affected by metastatic prostate cancer. Follow-up for the onset of treatment-related cardiovascular events should therefore be considered in these patients.

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) tumours include a heterogeneous group of malignancies that profoundly differ in terms of morphology, genetic profile, clinical behaviour and prognosis. The optimal treatment algorithm for nccRCC is still unknown and derived mainly from evidence available for ccRCC, being therefore represented by targeted agents against vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways. We aimed to compare the efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKis) and mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) for the treatment of nccRCC patients.Searching the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library and American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting abstracts prospective studies were identified. Data extraction was conduced according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The measured outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and the overall response rate (ORR).Four randomised controlled trials were selected for final analysis, with a total of 332 patients evaluable for PFS. Treatment with TKi significantly reduced the risk of progression compared with mTORi (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.84; p 0.0001). This difference remained significant when sunitinib was compared with everolimus in first-line setting (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56-0.80; p 0.00001). In the 332 patients evaluable for OS, no significant difference was found between TKi and mTORi (HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.67-1.12; p = 0.27). In the 176 evaluable patients, TKis therapy did not improve the ORR when compared with mTORi (relative risk [RR] = 2.21; 95% CI, 0.87-5.60; p = 0.09), even if treatment with sunitinib doubled the probability of achieving a tumour response.Treatment with TKis significantly improves PFS, but not OS, when compared with mTORi. Moreover, sunitinib as first-line therapy reduces the risk of progression compared with everolimus; therefore, supporting the standard treatment paradigm broadly used for ccRCC patients. The relatively modest efficacy of available targeted therapies reinforces the need of future histology based, molecular driven therapeutic paradigm.

Aim: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against PD-1/PD-L1 have recently entered the therapeutic algorithm of several solid tumors. Among treatment-related adverse events pulmonary toxicity (PT) is of particular interest. We assess the incidence and relative risk (RR) of PT in patients treated with anti-PD1/PD-L1 mAbs. Results: 11 articles were selected. The incidence of any- and high-grade PT was low (2.9 and 1.0%, respectively). Compared with standard therapies, anti-PD-1 mAbs do not significantly increase the risk of both any-grade (RR: 2.65; p = 0.06) and high-grade PT (RR: 1.40; p = 0.25). Of note, the RR: of developing any-grade (RR: 3.13; p < 0.0001) and high-grade (RR: 2.42; p = 0.03) PT significantly increased when excluding the Checkmate-025 trial, with everolimus as control therapy. No differences were identified between the type of mAbs, the tumor type and treatment duration for both any-grade and high-grade PT.

Despite the development of novel effective therapeutic strategies, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a disease with a lethal course and a high biological and molecular heterogeneity. To date, germline mutations in the BRCA gene represent one of the main risk factors for developing prostate cancer, with a strong association with aggressive phenotype and poor clinical outcomes. A better understanding of the genomic landscape of prostate cancer has strengthened the idea that "synthetic lethality" of this disease might be useful in cancer-drug discovery, focusing on agents such as platinum compounds and poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). In this review, we summarize the main data available on BRCA mutations and discuss the clinical implications of these genomic aberrations in the management of prostate cancer, stressing the need to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers and to deeply understand the mechanisms of treatment resistance, in order to maximize personalized medicine protocols and therefore clinical benefit.

e17081 Background: Biomarkers to select mRCC patients most likely to benefit to immunotherapy are needed. The retrospective multicentre Meet-URO-15 study evaluated the prognostic role of peripheral blood cells in mRCC patients treated with Nivolumab. Methods: Complete blood count was assessed at the first four cycles of Nivolumab. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS) according to bNLR. NLR was defined as neutrophil / lymphocyte (cutoff = 3) and ΔNLR the difference between NLR at 2nd cycle and bNLR (median as cutoff = 1.1). Results: From October 2015 to October 2019, 470 patients started Nivolumab as 2nd (67%), 3rd (22%) and > 3rd (11%) line. Median age was 66 years, 71% were male and 83% had clear cell histology. Baseline IMDC group was favorable in 25%, intermediate in 63% and poor in 12%. Lymph-nodes, visceral and bone metastases were present in 54%, 91% and 36%. mOS and progression-free survival (PFS) were 34.8 and 7.5 months. Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 30% and 61%. bNLR was available in 404 patients: bNLR < 3 (54%) correlated with statistically significant longer PFS [11.4 vs 5.4 months; HR 1.69 (1.33-2.15)] and OS [46.2 vs 17.2 months; HR 2.37 (1.72-3.26)] (both p< 0.001), with similar ORR (35% vs 30%, p= 0.28) but higher DCR (71% vs 52%, p< 0.001). ΔNLR was available in 360 patients: ΔNLR < 1.1 (73%) correlated with a statistically significant improvement of PFS [11.2 vs 4.9 months; HR 1.53 (1.16-2.03), p= 0.03], OS [Not Reached vs 19.7 months; HR 1.83 (1.28-2.61), p= 0.001], ORR (37% vs 23%, p= 0.011) and DCR (68% vs 53%, p= 0.008). Multivariate analyses adjusted for IMDC group, line of therapy and metastatic sites, confirmed the statistically significant correlation of bNLR and ΔNLR with OS, PFS and DCR. Conclusions: Our study showed the statistically significant correlation of lower bNLR and early ΔNLR with longer OS, PFS and higher DCR in mRCC patients treated with Nivolumab.

5072 Background: Biomarkers to select mRCC patients most likely to benefit to immunotherapy are still needed. The retrospective multicentre Meet-URO-15 study evaluated the prognostic role of peripheral blood cells in mRCC patients treated with Nivolumab. Methods: Complete blood count was collected at the first four cycles of Nivolumab. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS) according to baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Secondary analyses included bSII defined as platelet x NLR (cutoff = 1375) and ΔSII defined as the difference between SII at 2ndcycle and bSII (median used as cutoff = 383). Results: From October 2015 to October 2019, 470 patients started Nivolumab as 2nd(67%), 3rd(22%) and > 3rd(11%) line. Median age was 66 years, 71% were male and 83% had clear cell histology. Baseline IMDC group was favorable in 25%, intermediate in 63% and poor in 12%. Lymph-nodes, visceral and bone metastases were present in 54%, 91% and 36%. mOS and progression-free survival (PFS) were 34.8 and 7.5 months. Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 30% and 61%. SII was available in 404 patients: SII < 1375 (82%) correlated with statistically significant improvement of PFS [10.2 vs 4.1 months, HR 2.06 (1.54-2.76), p< 0.001], OS [46.2 vs 9.5 months, HR 3.16 (2.23-4.49), p< 0.001], ORR (35% vs 21%, p= 0.035) and DCR (67% vs 40%, p< 0.001). ΔSII was available in 360 patients: ΔSII < 383 (75%) correlated with statistically significant improvement of PFS [11.3 vs 4.7 months; HR 1.64 (1.23-2.18), p= 0.001] and OS [NR vs 21.1 months; HR 1.76 (1.21-2.56), p= 0.003], ORR (37% vs 24%, p= 0.023) and DCR (68% vs 53%, p= 0.01). Multivariate analyses adjusted for IMDC group, line of therapy and metastatic sites, confirmed the statistically significant correlation of bSII and ΔSII with OS, PFS and DCR. Conclusions: Our study showed the statistically significant correlation of lower bSII and early ΔSII with longer OS, PFS and higher DCR in mRCC patients treated with Nivolumab.

TPS762 Background: The combination of avelumab plus axitinib has been recently reported to be superior than sunitinib alone for treatment of previously untreated mRCC patients (Motzer, NEJM 2019). The study reported a median PFS of 13.8 for the combination of avelumab plus axitinib compared to 8.4 months for sunitinib (p

De novo metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) accounts for about 4% of all prostate tumors in Western Countries. This condition has a heterogeneous biological e clinical behavior, ranging from indolent to aggressive and rapidly fatal forms. Recently, the therapeutic landscape for mCSPC has been broadly enriched; indeed robust evidence supports the addiction of chemotherapy (docetaxel) or abiraterone acetate to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the latter considered for long the unique standard of care. However, the prognostic stratification and the definition of the ideal therapeutic approach for the subpopulation of de novo mCSPC - albeit largely represented in pivotal clinical trials enrolling mCSPC patients - have yet to be prospectively outlined. The aim of this review was to describe the current state of art about clinical presentation, prognostic classification, and different therapeutic options available for de novo mCSPC patients. Furthermore, we shed light on ongoing clinical trials and future perspectives for this disease setting.

Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors against PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA4 have emerged as new treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), despite discrepancy between their effects on OS and PFS. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing immunotherapy to standard of care (SOC) in mRCC.Searching the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library and ASCO Meeting abstracts prospective studies were identified. Data extraction was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. The measured outcomes were OS, PFS, and ORR.A total of 2832 patients were available for evaluation of OS, and 3033 for PFS and ORR. Compared to SOC, immunotherapy improved OS (HR = 0.75; 95%CI 0.66-0.85; p 0.001), and PFS (HR = 0.88; 95%CI 0.80-0.97; p = 0.009). The PFS benefit was not confirmed when considering patients treated in first-line only (p = 0.10). Conversely, significant ORR improvement was found in patients treated in first-line only (HR = 1.14; 95%CI 1.02-1.28; p = 0.03) but not in the overall population.Immunotherapy improved OS compared to SOC in mRCC, irrespective of treatment line. In first-line, immunotherapy also increased the ORR compared to sunitinib. A lack of correlation between OS and PFS was confirmed, the latter to be used cautiously for the design and interpretation of trials involving immunotherapy in mRCC.

Background Despite important results achieved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, some patients could benefit from local treatments or an initial active surveillance (AS) period for recurrent disease. We aim to analyze: changes in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk class, the number of metastases and the disease burden from the start of AS to the beginning of systemic therapy; and if these changes influenced patient outcomes. Patients and Methods Patients who started AS at our institution from January 2007 to April 2016 were included. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate total overall survival (tOS) and progression-free survival. Changes in IMDC class, number of metastatic sites, and tumor burden (TB) were evaluated and related to patient survival. Among the patients who started active treatment, progression-free survival and post surveillance OS (psOS) were evaluated. Results 52 patients were included in the analysis. Median time on AS and tOS were 18.3 and 80.1 months respectively. Baseline factors were not related to the time on AS apart from the IMDC classification (HR = 2.15; 95% CI: 1.19–3.87; P = 0.011). The increase in the number of metastatic sites during AS was correlated with poor tOS (HR = 2.86; 95% CI: 1.29–6.34; P = 0.010). The increase of the TB was a negative prognosis factor for tOS (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.02–1.31; P = 0.024) and psOS (HR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.07–1.40; P = 0.004). Both IMDC class and change in the TB at the start of therapy were related to psOS. The retrospective nature and the lack of an external review of the imaging are its main limitations. Conclusions During AS, patients rarely experience a deterioration of their IMDC prognostic class, and the change in the TB, more than the increase in the number of metastatic sites, may help physicians to make decisions about the early termination of AS and the start of systemic therapy.

Very interesting issues regarding RCC treatment have been raised during 2017. We analysed the main news that may potentially modified clinical practice. Conflicting data came from trials testing targeted therapies in the adjuvant setting, supporting the necessity of further investigations. One of the key goals of RCC research is focused on the first-line therapy, with particular interest focus on immunotherapy combinations. Redefine the standard of care with the aim of improving patients' survival represents an imperative need. Enhancing immunotherapy antitumor activity by combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with anti-angiogenetic therapies is a noteworthy research field, with promising results. In addiction, we analysed in the metastatic setting data about the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy and the possibility of delay the start of first-line therapy after an active surveillance period. Based on recent developments, the paper outlines future prospective of RCC research.

Sunitinib represents a reasonable therapeutic option for first-line treatment of poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma and the treatment should aim at the delicate balance between managing side effects to improve the toxicity profile and patient compliance to treatment while maintaining anticancer efficacy. Achievement of a complete response, although rare, is possible, even in poor-risk patients. Treatment discontinuation represents a viable alternative for both tumour biology and patients' quality of life. To date, no molecular markers have been identified with prognostic and/or predictive value for guiding therapeutic decisions. Further research should aim at gaining in-depth knowledge of renal cell carcinoma biology for a tailored personalized therapy. We report a case of poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma, with Von Hippel-Lindau loss of function, which achieved and maintained a complete remission after first-line therapy with sunitinib by using a reduced dosage and a modified schedule of treatment.

e14156 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy have shown survival benefits in the treatment of several ATs. However, the risk of serious side effects seems greater in certain types of tumors presenting reduced compliance with therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety profile and clinical benefits of IT, as appraised using clinically related biomarkers of pts outside clinical trials. Methods: In this retrospective study, data were evaluated on pts in the Reggio Emilia Provincial Oncology Network who were treated for ATs using Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and Ipilimumab monotherapy in clinical practice. The pts included in the study had received at least 1 dose of IT by June 2018. LDH and neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were collected at baseline, antibiotic therapy (ATB) was considered during IT, and immunorelated adverse events (irAEs) were assessed with CTCAE v.4.1. Results: A total of 169 pts were examined: 78 with NSCLC, 57 with melanoma, 29 with kidney cancer, 3 with head-neck cancer and 2 with colorectal cancer. 123 pts (73%) were treated with Nivolumab, 36 (21%) with Pembrolizumab and 10 (6%) with Ipilimumab. Overall, 62 pts (37%) experienced irAES of any degree: 17/29 (59%) pts with kidney cancer presented irAES, while only 35% (20/57) and 31% (24/78) of pts with melanoma and lung cancer did, respectively. A total of 27/62 (43%) pts delayed IT due to toxicity, but only 7/62 (11%) pts discontinued treatment due to irAEs. Statistically significant increases in PFS (11 vs. 5 months, p = 0.002) and OS (19.9 vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.002) were found between pts who experienced irAEs and those who did not. As previously demonstrated in other groups of pts, in the Cox regression performed for OS, a baseline value of LDH≥1.5xULN and median NLR ≥2.93 correlates with poor prognosis. Unlike what is already known, the use of ATB during IT (35% of pts) correlates with increased survival (HR 0.59; IC95% 0.37-0.94, p = 0.028). Conclusions: These data confirm the tolerability of IT in an unselected real-world population. In particular, the development of irAEs could be considered a positive predictor of outcome, but with a different incidence among MTS.

Persistent androgen receptor (AR) axis is a functionally important pathway for prostate cancer cells and it is currently regarded as a critical therapeutic target. Although the impressive clinical activity of new hormonal agents, such as the second-generation AR antagonist enzalutamide (formerly MDV3100) and the selective inhibitor of cytochrome P450 17A1 (CYP17A1) abiraterone acetate (AA), in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), innate or acquired resistance invariably arises. To date, emerging hypotheses are different, but the mechanisms of resistance to these drugs have not yet been clarified. The aim of this review is to summarize the main data available on the evaluation of the multiple levels of development of resistance to next-generation AR-directed therapies. Understanding how the AR is activated may have clinical implications in defining which patients will respond to existing therapeutic agents and provide a proof for making novel strategies.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a metabolic disease, being characterized by the dysregulation of metabolic pathways involved in oxygen sensing (VHL/HIF pathway alterations and the subsequent up-regulation of HIF-responsive genes such as VEGF, PDGF, EGF, and glucose transporters GLUT1 and GLUT4, which justify the RCC reliance on aerobic glycolysis), energy sensing (fumarate hydratase-deficient, succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC, mutations of HGF/MET pathway resulting in the metabolic Warburg shift marked by RCC increased dependence on aerobic glycolysis and the pentose phosphate shunt, augmented lipogenesis, and reduced AMPK and Krebs cycle activity) and/or nutrient sensing cascade (deregulation of AMPK-TSC1/2-mTOR and PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathways). We analyzed the key metabolic abnormalities underlying RCC carcinogenesis, highlighting those altered pathways that may represent potential targets for the development of more effective therapeutic strategies.

435 Background: Targeted therapies (TT) improved survival in mRCC but treatment-related toxicities may worsen quality of life and lead to treatment discontinuation. AS is a feasible strategy in pts with indolent disease but effects on tumor burden (TB) and prognosis have not been investigated. Methods: In this retrospective study we included pts who received AS at our centre. The TB, defined as the number of sites of disease, was collected with the IMDC class, just before and after AS. The time on surveillance (ToS) was defined as the time from the start of AS to the beginning of therapy or last follow-up. The OSs were collected from the start of AS or TT. Results: 48 pts started AS from January 2007 to April 2016. After a median follow up of 37.3 months, 79.2% are still alive. At baseline the main sites of metastases were: lung (56%), nodes (25%), pancreas (14%), adrenal gland (8%), CNS (8%), and bone (6%). TB was one site in 65 %, two in 31%, and >2 sites in 4%. The IMDC prognostic class was favorable in 68,8%, intermediate in 25%, and poor in 6.3% of pts. After a median ToS of 16.7 months (95% CI 9.6-23.7), 34 patients (70.8%) started a TT, only 1/24 patient had progression as the best response. Significant difference in ToS were found where pts with good (19.9 mos) or intermediate (17.7 mos) class were compared to the poor group (5.2 months) (p2 sites in 18%; and 14 pts had new sites of disease. The IMDC class changed in four patients from good to intermediate. The median OSs was not reached from the start of surveillance and was 64.4 months from the start of TT. Conclusions: AS is an option for management of mRCC pts with good and intermediate prognosis. AS allows to delay the start of TT avoiding toxicity and worsening quality of life. Despite the fact pts in AS have increased TB and rarely a worsening of prognostic class, the survival remains longer and the effectiveness of subsequent therapy seems not to be affected.

553 Background: SU and PA are both VEGFR TKI approved for treatment of mRCC. Previous studies reported that the reduced dose (RD) is not recommended for the beginning of therapy (Motzer et al. 2012) and suggested a direct correlation between dose and effectiveness of therapy (Houk et al. 2010). We aim to investigate if patients (pts) that decreased the dose during treatment have different outcomes compared to those who continue a standard dose (SD). Methods: All pts affected by mRCC who started SU or PA at SD have been included. Pts were divided into two groups: RD and SD, based on whether they reduced the therapy or not. The main reasons for dose change have been collected and the RD group was defined into 2 levels (1st level: SU37.5mg/d, 4/2 or PA 600mg/d; 2nd level: SU25mg/d, 4/2 or PA 400mg/d). Pts were stratified by IMDC prognostic criteria and differences in pts’ characteristics between RD and SD groups were evaluated as well as median PFS and OS. Results: A total of 280 pts have been included. Median age was 62y and 68% was male; 54% had good prognosis, 40% intermediate and 6% poor. First-line was SU in 84% and PA in 16% of cases. A total of 123 (44%) pts decreased the dose to first- (89%) or second-level (11%). The main reasons were hand-foot syndrome (17.9%), diarrhea (15.4%) asthenia (14.6%), mucositis (13.0%) and thrombocytopenia (11.4%). Significant differences between RD and SD groups were the female sex (40% vs. 25%; p = 0.01) and the rate of primary refractory disease (11% vs. 31%: p < 0.001). Median PFS and OS were 12.4 and 34.9 mos, respectively. In RD group, the median time before dose reduction was 3.5 mos. Excluding the primary refractory pts, median PFS was 18.6 and 15.0 mos (p = 0.06) and median OS was 68.0 and 40.7 mos (p = 0.14) in RD and SD group, respectively. In RD group, no differences between 1st- and 2nd-level of dose were observed both in PFS (11.0 vs. 13.1 mos; p = 0.82) and OS (42.8 vs. 36.0 mos; p = 0.78) after reduction. Conclusions: Dose reduction is a frequent event in pts who started a first-line therapy with SU or PA. This study reports that DR does not affect the survival of pts who initially started SU and PA at standard dose.