1. A systematic review of inter-individual differences in the DNA repair processes involved in melphalan monoadduct repair in relation to treatment outcomes
- Author
-
Kathryn E Burns, Maia van Kan, and Nuala A. Helsby
- Subjects
Pharmacology ,Melphalan ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,biology ,DNA repair ,business.industry ,Toxicology ,Proliferating cell nuclear antigen ,XRCC1 ,MUTYH ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,biology.protein ,ERCC2 ,Pharmacology (medical) ,ERCC1 ,business ,ERCC4 ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Melphalan is a bifunctional alkylating agent that elicits its cytotoxic activity by rapidly forming an initial DNA monoadduct, which then produces an inter-strand crosslink. Most studies exploring the role of inherited differences in DNA repair and melphalan outcomes focus on inter-strand crosslink repair, however, monoadduct repair likely plays a key role since it minimises the ultimate production of these crosslinks. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess evidence of an association between variation in monoadduct repair pathways and melphalan response. A literature search was undertaken using Medline, Embase, Scopus and PubMed databases. Duplicates were removed and only full-text articles were included. To be included for critique in this systematic review, articles were assessed for relevance using strict inclusion/exclusion criteria. Fourteen studies were identified that involved patients treated with melphalan, however, in 3, only a minority of the cohort received melphalan. Across the remaining 11 studies, 61 genes/proteins in DNA monoadduct repair pathways were assessed. Both germline SNP (CDKN1A, ERCC1, ERCC2, ERCC4, ERCC6, EXO1, MLH1, MNAT1, MUTYH, PARP4, PCNA, POLE, POLR1G, RAD23B, RFC1, RFC3, RPA1, RPA3, TREX1, UNG, XPC, XRCC1) and somatic expression (CDKN1A, PARP1, PCNA, MGMT, RECQL, RFC5) were associated with melphalan outcomes in ≥ 1 study. It appears that inherited germline differences in monoadduct repair genes may be a risk factor for poor outcomes. However, the diversity of study design, patient cohorts, genes assessed and lack of replication, preclude any meta-analysis. Further prospective studies are required to validate these findings.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF