Search

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represent a heterogeneous population and therefore there is no standard of care first salvage regimen. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis to compare chemotherapy (e.g. HyperCVAD, MOAD, Larson/CALGB-9511, etc.) to novel agents (blinatumomab or inotuzumab) in first salvage. The primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was not significantly different among treatment arms, with a median OS of 10.6 months with chemotherapy and 10.1 months with novel therapy (

Background Patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia with a FLT3 mutation (FLT3+ AML) have historically had poor outcomes. While the addition of the FLT3 inhibitors to induction therapy has been shown to improve survival outcomes in FLT3+ AML, interactions and overlapping toxicities between FLT3 inhibitors and standard of care medications used during induction therapy (e.g. azole antifungals, anthracyclines) and logistical barriers have complicated their use. To avoid these concerns, our institution has opted to defer initiation of midostaurin until after completion of induction therapy. However, to our knowledge no study confirming the effectiveness of this strategy for real world FLT3 inhibitor use has been published. Methods We performed a single center, propensity-score matched, retrospective cohort study characterizing efficacy and safety of our strategy for use of FLT3 inhibitors in the treatment of FLT3+ AML. The primary outcome was median event-free survival (EFS), while secondary endpoints included median overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), 30-day mortality, duration of neutropenia, duration of thrombocytopenia, consolidation cycle delays, documented infections, and all-cause hospital readmission. Results A total of 83 FLT3+ AML patients treated with intensive induction therapy were included in the study, of whom 48 were propensity-score matched and analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between the patients who received a FLT3 inhibitor after induction therapy and the historical control arm. Median EFS was not significantly different but compared favorably between the FLT3 inhibitor cohort and historical controls (not reached vs 8 months, p = 0.343) with 18-month EFS of 54% and 43% for the two cohorts, respectively. Similarly, no significant differences were noted with regard to median OS (not reached vs 28.7 months, p = 0.752), ORR (79.2% vs 79.2%), or safety outcomes between groups. Conclusion Compared to historical controls, addition of a FLT3 inhibitor to intensive chemotherapy post-induction may improve EFS or OS in a real world patient cohort with longer follow-up and a larger sample size. The omission of midostaurin in induction allowed for the use of an azole antifungal and the intensification of anthracycline dose may have contributed to high remission rates in both groups.

PEG-asparaginase is a key component in treatment regimens for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Major side effects include thrombosis and bleeding; however, there is currently no consensus on methods to prevent these complications. In this multi-center retrospective cohort study of 101 adults, we compared two prophylaxis strategies: cryoprecipitate and fresh frozen plasma (Cryo/FFP) versus cryoprecipitate and antithrombin (ATIII). The overall incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was not significantly different between the two groups (19.7% for Cryo/FFP and 8.6% in Cryo/ATIII,ip/i = 0.17), and neither was grade ≥3 bleeding (3% for Cryo/FFP and 11.4% for Cryo/ATIII,ip/i = 0.18). Given the significant cost associated with ATIII without a clear benefit, a careful benefit and risk analysis should be considered before utilizing ATIII as a prophylaxis strategy to prevent thrombosis or bleeding following asparaginase administration.

Liposomal daunorubicin/cytarabine (CPX-351) gained FDA approval for secondary AML after demonstrating improved outcomes over daunorubicin and cytarabine (7 + 3). A number of study limitations prompted a comparison of safety/efficacy of CPX-351 against regimens containing a purine analogue and high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC). This retrospective study compared complete response rates with/without count recovery (CR/CRi) between HIDAC-based regimens and CPX-351 in 169 patients with newly diagnosed sAML. The CR/CRi rate was 62.7% in the HIDAC-based therapy arm vs. 47.9% in the CPX-351 arm (

The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the BCR-ABL fusion protein have dramatically changed the clinical management and outcomes for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML)...

The NCCN Guidelines for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) provide recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with AML based on clinical trials that have led to significant improvements in treatment, or have yielded new information regarding factors with prognostic importance, and are intended to aid physicians with clinical decision-making. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent select updates to the NCCN Guidelines, including familial genetic alterations in AML, postinduction or postremission treatment strategies in low-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia or favorable-risk AML, principles surrounding the use of venetoclax-based therapies, and considerations for patients who prefer not to receive blood transfusions during treatment.

Internal tandem duplications and tyrosine kinase mutations in the fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) receptor can occur in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and portend a poor prognosis. Midostaurin, a multikinase inhibitor that targets FLT3, demonstrated a survival benefit in FLT3-mutated AML in combination with front-line chemotherapy. Despite this advancement, the use of FLT3 inhibitors in clinical practice is complicated by significant drug-drug interactions and uncertainty about optimal timing, duration, and sequencing of therapy. As monotherapy, the utility of FLT3 inhibitors was initially limited by incomplete and transient clinical responses and the development of acquired resistance. This led to the development of more potent and selective FLT3 inhibitors designed to overcome common resistance mechanisms. One of these second generation FLT3 inhibitors, gilteritinib, is now FDA-approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory AML. Now that multiple FLT3 inhibitors are commercially available, it is important to further delineate the role of these agents in the AML population. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of FLT3 inhibitors in AML and apply the current literature to clinical practice.

Conventional karyotyping is essential standard practice in the initial evaluation of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and is the most impactful single component of the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). While single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-A) has demonstrated the ability to detect chromosomal defects with greater sensitivity than conventional karyotype, widespread adoption is limited by the unknown additional prognostic impact of SNP-A analysis. Here, we investigate the significance of additional SNP-A abnormalities in the setting of MDS and demonstrate differences in survival of patients with additional abnormalities, even those initially characterized as relatively lower risk either by cytogenetic score or IPSS-R. Our findings identify specific abnormalities, particularly KMT2A partial tandem duplication, that are invisible to conventional karyotype and potentially contribute to the poor prognosis of MDS patients. Furthermore, these results demonstrate the added value of SNP-A analysis in identifying patients who may benefit from more aggressive therapy, particularly those who would otherwise be classified into lower risk categories.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of acute leukemia among adults and accounts for the largest number of annual deaths due to leukemias in the United States. Recent advances have resulted in an expansion of treatment options for AML, especially concerning targeted therapies and low-intensity regimens. This portion of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for AML focuses on the management of AML and provides recommendations on the workup, diagnostic evaluation and treatment options for younger (age

The availability of Erwinia Asparaginase has been limited across the world due to manufacturing shortages or for some countries due to the high acquisition cost, putting patients at risk for inferior outcomes. This manuscript provides guidance on how to manage hypersensitivity reactions and utilize therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to conserve and limit Erwinia use. The clinical and financial impact of a multidisciplinary committee are also discussed. Faced with a global Erwinia shortage, a multidisciplinary asparaginase allergy committee was created to review all hypersensitivity reactions to asparaginase therapy, staff education was performed on the management of asparaginase hypersensitivity reactions, an institution-wide premedication policy was mandated, and standardized guidelines were created for TDM. This multidisciplinary approach reduced the PEG-asparaginase to Erwinia switch rate from 21% (35 of 163) to 7% (10 of 134) (

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous category of myeloid neoplasms that represent the most common class of acquired bone marrow failure syndromes in adults. MDS is typically associated with a hypoproliferative macrocytic anemia, but atypical findings on initial diagnostic evaluations can raise concern for a distinct pathophysiological process and lead to the investigation of alternative etiologies. Here, we report a case of MDS with a concomitant hypoproliferative microcytic and hypochromic anemia that led to the identification of acquired hemoglobin H due to a novel somatic ATRX mutation.

Secondary AML is associated with a disproportionately poor prognosis, consistently shown to exhibit inferior response rates, event-free survival, and overall survival in comparison with de novo AML. Secondary AML may arise from the evolution of an antecedent hematologic disorder, or it may arise as a complication of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy in the case of therapy-related AML. Because of the high frequency of poor-risk cytogenetics and high-risk molecular features, such as alterations in TP53, leukemic clones are often inherently chemoresistant. Standard of care induction had long remained conventional 7 + 3 until its reformulation as CPX-351, recently FDA approved specifically for secondary AML. However, recent data also suggests relatively favorable outcomes with regimens based on high-dose cytarabine or hypomethylating agents. With several investigational agents being studied, the therapeutic landscape becomes even more complex, and the treatment approach involves patient-specific, disease-specific, and therapy-specific considerations.

BACKGROUND The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has dramatically improved outcomes for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); however, the prognosis for those who do not meet treatment milestones remains guarded. Here, we report our experience of patients with CML treated at a single center who did not achieve a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 24 months. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 305 patients who were diagnosed with CML at the University of Michigan between 2001 and 2014 and were treated with TKIs. We assessed rates of CCyR at 24 months correlated to clinical outcomes. RESULTS The majority of patients (79%) achieved CCyR at 24 months and were classified as responders. At a median follow-up of 8.1 years from TKI initiation, overall survival among responders was significantly greater than nonresponders (93% vs. 85%, P < .001). Progression to blast phase was more common in nonresponders (1.9% vs. 10.4%, P = .004). However, 34% of nonresponders (at 24 months) went on to achieve CCyR with continued TKI therapy. CONCLUSION Here, we re-demonstrate the importance of early CCyR in predicting survival and prevention of progression to blast phase. In addition, late CCyR appears to have prognostic implications, and continued TKI therapy with the goal of achieving a later CCyR may be a reasonable strategy in patients with limited alternate treatment options.

Background Acute leukemia with mixed-phenotype blasts is associated with poor outcomes. There are no standard treatment regimens. Due to disease heterogeneity, controversy exists over whether an AML-based, ALL-based, or a combined (hybrid) AML/ALL-based regimen is most appropriate. Materials and Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective case series review of patients with acute leukemia with mixed phenotype blasts as described by the European Group for Immunological Characterization of Leukemia (EGIL) or the 2008 WHO classification. Patients were treated from November 2014 and December 2019 with the combination chemotherapy regimen FLAG-idarubicin-vincristine-prednisone with or without rituximab. Outcomes included induction response, time to transplant, time to relapse, overall survival, time to neutrophil or platelet recovery, infection, and duration of hospitalization. Results The median age was 68 years (range 21−77). Six patients (87.5 %) had unfavorable/complex cytogenetics. All patients achieved a complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi). Estimated 1-year overall survival was 85.7 %. There were no deaths during induction, with a 22 day median duration of hospitalization for induction. Conclusion The combination of FLAG, idarubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (FLAG-VIPR) demonstrated favorable induction responses in a disease state with historically poor outcomes and should be studied in a prospective clinical trial.

Background: All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) serves as the backbone of the management of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), with guidelines recommending the initiation of ATRA as soon as APL is suspected. As a regional referral center for patients with acute leukemia, those who are suspected of having APL are often transferred to our facility. However, many referring centers are unable to initiate treatment using ATRA. We conducted an exploratory analysis of the clinical availability of ATRA and the factors limiting access to this critical drug. Patients and Methods: The United States was divided into 6 geographic regions: Northwest, Southwest, Central, Southeast, Northeast, and the Great Lakes. Twenty hospitals were randomly selected from states within each of these regions and were surveyed as to whether they typically treated patients with acute leukemia, the availability of ATRA at their institution, and reported reasons for not stocking ATRA (if not available). Results: Less than one-third of hospitals queried (31%) had ATRA in stock. Neither the size of the hospital nor the hospital’s status as academic versus nonacademic (53% vs 31%; P=.08) influenced ATRA availability. Of the hospitals that referred patients with APL, only 14% (7/49) had ATRA readily available. Hospitals that treated patients with APL were more likely to have ATRA available than referring centers (58% vs 14%; P=.000002). Conclusions: Nearly two-thirds of the hospitals surveyed that cared for patients with acute leukemia do not have ATRA immediately available. Moreover, the vast majority of hospitals that refer patients to other centers do not have ATRA. These findings should spur investigation into the impact of immediate ATRA availability on the morbidity and mortality of patients with APL. A call by hematologists nationwide to their formulary committees is warranted to ensure that this lifesaving medication is available to patients suspected of having APL.

Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been associated with a worse prognosis compared to Ph negative ALL. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has led to an improvement in response rates and survival, thus becoming a critical component of therapy. We performed a retrospective cohort study of Ph+ ALL patients treated at the University of Michigan who received TKI therapy pre- and post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from April 2007 to November 2019. The study included 40 patients with Ph+ ALL (47.5% female) with a median age of 54 (24-69) years. Median event-free survival (EFS) was not reached, with a 5-year EFS of 61%. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached, with a 5-year OS of 71%. There was no difference in 2-year EFS or OS for patients on pre-transplant imatinib or dasatinib (p = 0.16, 0.09, respectively), though definitive conclusions are challenging as post-transplant TKI therapy was variable. The incidence of any grade acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 62.5% (25/40) and any grade chronic GVHD was 77.5% (31/40). Complete molecular remission (CMR) was achieved in 57.5% of patients pre-transplant with no significant difference when stratified by induction TKI (p = 1). Achievement of CMR pre-HSCT showed a trend towards improved 2-year EFS (p=0.0198) but did not significantly change 2-year OS (p = 1). Patients receiving 1

Introduction Blast-phase (BP), or leukemic transformation is a rare and devastating complication of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) (primary myelofibrosis (PMF), polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and post-PV/ET myelofibrosis). Patients with BP-MPNs have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival of less than 6 months, and there is no standard treatment regimen for these aggressive diseases (Dunbar et al, Blood. 2020). The development of hypomethylating agent (HMA)/venetoclax (Ven) combination offers new hope for some with AML, but has been relatively disappointing in BP-MPN, though data are limited and retrospective (Masarova et al, Blood Adv. 2021; Gangat et al, Am J Hematol. 2021). Here, we add our experience with several common treatment regimens for BP-MPN. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 39 consecutive patients with BP-MPNs diagnosed from December 2008 to February 2021 who received treatment at the University of Michigan. We included all patients with a previous diagnosis of MPNs who had ≥ 20% blasts in the peripheral blood or bone marrow, and subsequently received systemic therapy. One patient with a myeloid sarcoma was included as well. Disease characteristics at time of BP-transformation were noted. Patients were divided into the following groups based on 1 st-line induction therapy: 7+3 (daunorubicin and cytarabine), FLAG (fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine and G-CSF), hypomethylating agent only (decitabine or azacitidine), and HMA/Ven. Patients were followed for 2 years post-diagnosis. Differences in induction response were assessed using the Chi-square test. Differences in overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier regression with the log-rank test. Two patients who received alternate induction therapy outside of the four groups were not included in these analyses. Results The composite BP-MPN population had a median advanced age of 69 years old and a median ECOG performance status (PS) of 1. Most (97.4%) had received systemic treatment prior to their transformation for their MPN, with 71.8% receiving hydroxyurea and 41.0% receiving ruxolitinib. The rate of response (CR, CRi, MLFS) was highest in the HMA/Ven group at 42.9%, followed by FLAG (29.4%), HMA only (11.1%), and 7+3 (0%), p = 0.033 (Table 3). Despite the higher response rate, differences in 2-year OS were not significantly different among the 4 groups: 7+3 (25.0%), FLAG (7.7%), HMA (0%), HMA/Ven (20.0%) (p=0.92, Figure 1). Median time to relapse after achieving remission ranged from 2-10 months, and did not vary significantly based on induction regimen. Patients in the HMA and HMA/Ven groups had higher incidences of death with induction at 77.8% and 28.6%, respectively (Table 3). Conclusions The highest rates of response, including complete remission, were achieved with the combination of HMA and venetoclax compared to intensive induction chemotherapy or HMA alone. However, this did not translate into significant differences in OS, which is consistent with other retrospective reports. No responses were seen with 7+3 induction, though several patients were able to go on salvaged with other therapies and subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation thereafter. Finally, the baseline poor ECOG PS of the HMA group and borderline ECOG PS of the HMA/Ven group also contribute to their low survival rates.Larger, prospective studies comparing currently available treatment regimens in BP-MPN would be helpful, but ultimately new therapies are desperately needed for this high-risk disease. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bixby: Takeda: Consultancy. Talpaz: Constellation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Other: Grant/research support ; Celgene: Consultancy; Imago: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Context: The current standard of care for Ph+ ALL is concurrent chemotherapy or corticosteroids with a TKI, followed by an allogeneic transplant for those who are eligible and have attained complete morphologic remission. However, recent studies have suggested that transplant may not be necessary for all patients with Ph+ ALL, especially those who achieve CMR after induction. Objective: Our objective is to analyze the outcomes and characteristics of patients with Ph+ ALL treated within our institution who did not undergo allogeneic stem cell transplant. Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with Ph+ ALL who did not undergo allogeneic stem cell transplant treated at the University of Michigan between 2007 and 2019. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measurements of our study were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Results: 31 patients were identified in our database and met eligibility criteria. 30/31 patients received an upfront TKI (20 received dasatinib, 9 received imatinib, and 1 received ponatinib). 11 patients had molecular testing, and 4 had an IKZF1 mutation. The median OS was 388 days, with a median EFS of 247 days. 7 patients were deemed medically eligible for transplant but did not undergo transplant for reasons including patient preference and lack of an adequately matched donor. The median OS was 372 days for these 7 patients. 10/31 patients achieved CMR, with a median time to CMR of 148.5 days. The median OS in patients who achieved CMR was 551 days. The median OS for those who survived at least 50 days after diagnosis was 494 days. Cox regression analysis found an HR of.129 [0.020–0.841] for initial induction with hyperCVAD + TKI and an HR of 10.177 [1.209–85.677] with dexamethasone, vincristine, and TKI. No significant difference in OS was observed based on the choice of TKI. All patients who achieved CR experienced relapse or death during follow-up. Conclusions: Our results reveal poor outcomes in non-transplanted patients with Ph+ ALL and support the current standard of care utilizing concomitant chemotherapy and TKI with allogeneic transplant in those who are medically eligible.

Background Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) confers a poor prognosis, and there is no single standard of care first-line salvage regimen. FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) is a common salvage regimen with a favorable toxicity and efficacy profile in poor-risk AML. Materials and Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of first relapse/primary refractory patients with AML that received salvage chemotherapy from January 2009 to July 2019. We propensity-score matched patients 1:1 (based on age at diagnosis, cytogenetic risk group, Charlson comorbidity index, de novo vs. secondary AML, and whether or not they received an allogeneic stem cell transplant in first complete remission) into 2 groups, FLAG (Group 1) or non-FLAG (Group 2) as first-line salvage regimen, with 66 patients in each group. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (complete response and complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery). Results The median patient age was 59 years (range, 19-80 years). Patients treated with FLAG had a higher overall response rate (complete response/complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery) (71.2% vs. 50.0%; odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-5.08; P = .013), longer event-free survival (8.9 vs. 2.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86; P = .005), and longer overall survival (14.2 vs. 5.9 months; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.93; P = .019). Patients who received FLAG had a shorter median duration of neutropenia (22 vs. 34 days; HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29-0.64; P Conclusion This analysis supports the FLAG regimen as an effective and well-tolerated salvage therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory AML.

Asparaginase remains a cornerstone of ALL therapy and is one of the key contributing factors to improved outcomes in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients treated on pediatric protocols. Asparagine depletion has been associated with improved outcomes in ALL patients; this has led to an increased emphasis on optimizing asparagine depletion in ALL patients of all ages. To ensure adequate asparagine depletion, the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of asparaginase therapy holds much promise, yet remains underutilized in practice. Data regarding asparaginase activity level monitoring and associated outcomes are reviewed, and an evidence-based asparaginase activity level monitoring algorithm is presented. Finally, unique management strategies for key asparaginase toxicities in ALL patients are discussed, as well as a discussion of novel asparaginase formulations on the horizon.

Asparaginase is commonly de-emphasized/omitted in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia regimens due to poor tolerability, including hepatotoxicity (HTX). Adult patients (n = 100) given induction therapy containing pegylated asparaginase (PEG) from January 2008 to February 2016 were evaluated for HTX. Sixteen patients met criteria for HTX (direct bilirubin >3 g/dL). A multivariable model identified body surface area >2m2 (OR 7.40; 95% CI: 1.73–31.61, p = .007), albumin

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common form of acute leukemia among adults and accounts for the largest number of annual deaths due to leukemias in the United States. Recent advances have resulted in an expansion of treatment options for AML, especially concerning targeted therapies and low-intensity regimens. This portion of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for AML focuses on the management of AML and provides recommendations on the workup, diagnostic evaluation and treatment options for younger (age

Introduction: BST-236 (aspacytarabine), a novel pyrimidine antagonist, is a cytarabine prodrug designed to deliver high cytarabine doses with reduced systemic toxicity. BST-236 pharmacokinetics and metabolism reduce peak systemic exposure to free cytarabine and enable intensive treatment to patients otherwise unfit for intensive therapy. An open label phase 2b study, following a completed phase 1/2a dose escalation study, is ongoing. Enrolled are newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients unfit for standard therapy, including patients with treatment-related AML or AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with prior exposure to hypomethylating agents (HMA). Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BST-236 induction and consolidation in AML patients unfit for standard induction therapy. Methods: BST-236, at a dose of 4.5 g/m2/d (containing 3 g/m2/d of cytarabine), is evaluated as a first-line induction and consolidation therapy in newly-diagnosed AML patients unfit for standard chemotherapy. Patients with secondary AML, previously treated with HMA, as well as patients with therapy-related AML, are eligible. Each BST-236 induction and consolidation course consists of 6 daily 1-hour intravenous infusions. Results: To date, in the phase 1/2 and phase 2 studies, 42 AML patients were treated with BST-236, of whom 20 newly-diagnosed AML patients unfit for standard chemotherapy (median age 73 years) completed 1-4 courses of 4.5 g/m2/d BST-236. Of these, 40% had de novo AML and 60% had secondary AML. Thirty percent of patients were previously treated with HMA for MDS (median 10 courses), and 10% received prior chemo- or radiotherapy. The median baseline bone marrow blast percentage was 38 (range 13-94), and 35% and 53% of patients had intermediate or adverse European LeukemiaNet (ELN) score, respectively. BST-236 is safe and well-tolerated in repeated-course administration. Grade >2 adverse events include mainly hematological events and infections, with no other drug-related typical high-dose cytarabine events such as severe mucositis or cerebellar toxicity. Related serious adverse events include only cytopenia and pneumonia. The 30-day mortality rate is 7%. The complete remission (CR) rate in the evaluable patients to date who received 4.5 g/m2/d BST-236 is 50% in the de novo patients, 20% in secondary AML patients, and 20% in patients with prior HMA treatment. Forty-three percent of patients with adverse cytogenetics attained a CR, including 1 of 3 patients with a TP53 mutation. The median number of courses for reaching a CR is 1, and notably, all patients with bone marrow remission achieved complete hematological recovery within 36 days. BST-236 consolidation was well-tolerated and did not result in increased toxicity, enabling full count recovery. While none of the patients have undergone stem cell transplant, considered ineligible by the treating investigator, responses to BST-236 were durable and median overall survival (OS) for responders is not reached at 23 months (Figure 1A). Median OS for secondary AML patients was 6.8 months, and not reached for the de novo AML patients (Figure 1B). Follow up is ongoing with additional patients enrolling on study; updated analysis of response, minimal residual disease (MRD), duration of response, and OS will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The cumulative clinical data suggest that BST-236 as a single agent treatment is a safe and efficacious induction and consolidation therapy for patients who are unfit for standard intensive chemotherapy, including patients with adverse cytogenetics and prior exposure to HMA. The data may establish BST-236 as a new intensive therapy backbone of AML and may, for the first time, allow older adults deemed unfit for standard intensive induction and consolidation therapy, to benefit from an intensive treatment. Disclosures Altman: Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Syros: Consultancy; Theradex: Other: Advisory Board; Agios: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Other: Data safety and monitoring committee; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board - no payment but was reimbursed for travel; Kura Oncology: Other: Scientific Advisory Board - no payment accepted, Research Funding; BioSight: Other: No payment but was reimbursed for travel , Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Fujifilm: Research Funding; Kartos: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Amphivena: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Immune Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ASH: Consultancy; Cancer Expert Now: Consultancy; PeerView: Consultancy; Astellas: Other: Advisory Board, Speaker (no payment), Steering Committee (no payment), Research Funding; PrIME Oncology: Consultancy; France Foundation: Consultancy. Luger:Ariad: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; Acceleron: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Honoraria. Koprivnikar:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Kota:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical, Company Ltd, Cambridge, MA, USA: Honoraria; Xcenda: Honoraria. Emadi:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; NewLink Genetics: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KinaRx: Other: co-founder and scientific advisor. Bhatnagar:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KaryoPharm Therapuetics: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bixby:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding. Burch:Janssen: Other: paid speaker. Wolach:Amgen: Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Levi:Abbvie Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Flaishon:BioSight Ltd.: Current Employment. Tessler:BioSight Ltd.: Current Employment. Gengrinovitch:BioSight Ltd.: Current Employment. Ben Yakar:BioSight Ltd.: Current Employment. Rowe:Pluristem ltd: Consultancy.

Background: CFI-400945 is a potent, selective, orally administered, first-in-class inhibitor of the serine/threonine kinase, Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4). PLK4 is a highly conserved master regulator of centriole duplication, and is critical for maintenance of genomic integrity. Aberrant expression of PLK4 results in a number of effects including the centrosome amplification often seen in aneuploid cancers, pointing to a potentially causative role for PLK4 in genome instability and cancer progression. A Phase 1 study has been completed evaluating CFI-400945 as a monotherapy in solid tumors, showing a tolerable safety profile and promising signs of activity. As acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a disease characterized by genomic instability, it is of significant interest as a potential indication for the clinical evaluation of CFI-400945. pre-clinical studies, CFI-400945 showed potent activity towards leukemia cell lines and primary human samples in vitro, as well as marked efficacy in two subcutaneous models of leukemia, specifically the MV4-11 FLT3-ITD AML. A Phase 1 trial in AML was initiated at the Princess Margaret Cancer Center in 2018, and of six patients evaluable for response, two (33%) achieved complete remission (CR), and 3 patients (50%) had stable disease (with one patient having a 78% reduction in marrow blast count) [re: Murphy et al, ASH 2020]. These promising results have led to a plan for an expanded trial examining CFI-400945 in AML, particularly focused on complex karyotype (CK). Study Design and Methods: The study will have 4 parts, Part 1A (1A): a single agent dose escalation portion, Part 1B (1B): a food effect portion once the MTD of 1A is determined, and combinations with azacitidine (2A), and decitabine (2B). For parts 1A and 1B, patients with relapsed and/or refractory AML, MDS, or CMML after >1 prior therapy will be included. Patients with MDS or CMML must have progressed or had a lack of response after at least 4 cycles of hypomethylating agents. For parts 2A and 2B, patients should have relapsed and/or refractory AML or untreated MDS or CMML. Untreated patients who decline or are ineligible for intensive therapy may be included. The study will use a standard 3 + 3 design. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be defined as the dose level where the number of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) is Biomarker Selection and companion Diagnostics: No biomarker based pre-selection of patients. PD evaluations will include blast reduction and markers of mitosis. Study Treatment and Endpoints: Part 1: Each cycle will be 28 days (21 days on/7 days off). Starting does of CFI-400945 will be 32mg po. Once the MTD of 1A is determined, 1B will explore the food effect of a high fat meal on the PK of CFI-400945 at the MTD. 2A and 2B will explore the combination of CFI-400945 with standard dose of either azacitidine (2A) or decitabine (2B). The starting dose of CFI-400945 will be 32mg po for 21 days on/7 off. The DLTs will be defined as NCI CTCAE V5.0 Grade >3 related non-hematologic event(s) occurring during cycle 1 or prolonged pancytopenia in the presence of a hypocellular bone marrow > day 42 without evidence of disease. The efficacy endpoints for AML, MDS, and CMML include the overall response rate, and the CR rate per standard criteria. The aim of the food effect part of the study is the asses the effect of high fat food on the PK of CFI-400945. The safety endpoint is the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events. PK endpoints include evaluations of parameters such as half-life, AUC, etc. Exploratory endpoints include eval of minimal residual disease, genomic alterations and other molecular features associated with response and biological effects of PLK4 inhibition. Disclosures Jonas: Amgen: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; GlycoMimetics: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Sigma Tau: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Tolero: Consultancy; Treadwell: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Accelerated Medical Diagnostics: Research Funding; AROG: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Hanmi: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; LP Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Bixby:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding. Brandwein:Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Taiho: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Michelson:Treadwell Therapeutics: Consultancy. Bray:TIO Discovery: Current Employment; Treadwell Therapeutics: Current Employment. Roberts-Thomson:Treadwell Therapeutics: Current Employment. Borthakur:BioTherix: Consultancy; FTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Nkarta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Treadwell Therapeutics: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Xbiotech USA: Research Funding; Polaris: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; BioLine Rx: Research Funding; Jannsen: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BioLine Rx: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Curio Science LLC: Consultancy; Cyclacel: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding.

Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) confers a poor prognosis. Despite the identification of risk factors for CNS relapse (e.g. hyperleukocytosis), there is no standard practice for CNS relapse risk reduction with intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy in patients. We compared outcomes of 50 patients who did not receive IT chemotherapy with 18 patients who did receive IT chemotherapy with a hyperleukocytosis at diagnosis (defined as white blood cell count ≥100,000 cells/mcL). There were three occurrences of CNS relapse, all within patients who did not receive prophylaxis. There was no difference in the incidence of CNS relapse between the patient cohorts (

Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous clonal hematopoietic neoplasm. The cytogenetic changes associated with AML affect the response rate and survival and are one of the most important independent prognostic factors. AML with inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2); GATA2, MECOM accounts for 1% to 2% of all forms of AML and has been associated with a younger age at diagnosis, a poor response to standard induction chemotherapy, and very poor long-term prognosis. Patients and Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study comparing the outcomes with hypomethylating agent (HMA) plus lenalidomide to those with standard intensive induction therapies for newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory AML with inv(3). Results Of the 15 patients, 4 (26.7%) had received lenalidomide and HMA as primary therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) was 100% for the 4 patients who had received lenalidomide with HMA as first-line induction therapy. The ORR was 27.3% (3 of 11) for the patients who had received other induction regimens (P = .0256). The duration of response for first induction therapy was an average of 7.4 months after lenalidomide plus an HMA and a mean of 1.5 months after induction with other chemotherapy regimen (P = .057). The ORR for induction and reinduction therapy was also assessed, with an ORR of 21.4% (6 of 28) for alternative chemotherapy regimens and an ORR of 75% (6 of 8) for induction and reinduction with lenalidomide plus HMA (P = .0046). Conclusions The high ORR and reasonable duration of response could allow for potentially curative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for these patients with high-risk AML. Our initial data suggest that lenalidomide plus HMA is a promising approach for patients with AML with inv(3).

Background Despite fungal prophylaxis, invasive mold infections (IMIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving remission induction chemotherapy. The choice of antifungal prophylaxis agent remains controversial, especially in the era of novel targeted therapies. We conducted a retrospective case–control study to determine the incidence of fungal infections and to identify risk factors associated with IMI. Methods Adult patients with AML receiving anti-Aspergillus prophylaxis were included to determine the incidence of IMI per 1000 prophylaxis-days. Patients without and with IMI were matched 2:1 based on the day of IMI diagnosis, and multivariable models using logistic regression were constructed to identify risk factors for IMI. Results Of the 162 included patients, 28 patients had a possible (n = 22), probable, or proven (n = 6) diagnosis of IMI. The incidence of proven or probable IMI per 1000 prophylaxis-days was not statistically different between anti-Aspergillus azoles and micafungin (1.6 vs 5.4, P = .11). The duration of prophylaxis with each agent did not predict IMI occurrence on regression analysis. Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.004–1.081; P = .03) and relapsed/refractory AML diagnosis (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 1.56–12.64; P = .003) were associated with IMI on multivariable analysis. Conclusions In cases that preclude use of anti-Aspergillus azoles for prophylaxis, micafungin 100 mg once daily may be considered; however, in older patients and those with relapsed/refractory disease, diligent monitoring for IMI is required, irrespective of the agent used for antifungal prophylaxis., The risk for proven or probable breakthrough invasive mold infections (IMI) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients undergoing induction chemotherapy was not different between patients receiving micafungin or anti-aspergillus azoles. Older patients and those with relapsed or refractory AML were at the highest risk of breakthrough IMI.

Key Points This is the first report of successful treatment of therapy-resistant leptomeningeal T-PLL with intrathecal alemtuzumab. Intrathecal alemtuzumab is a potentially safe and efficacious therapeutic alternative for treatment of leptomeningeal T-PLL.

High dose cytarabine (HIDAC) consolidation has demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The increasing prevalence of obesity and the toxicity risk with this therapy renders important the quantification of potential risks with weight-based dosing in this patient population. The American Society of Clinical Oncology published recommendations on chemotherapy dosing in obese patients, but patients with leukemia were excluded from analysis. This was a retrospective comparison of safety and efficacy outcomes in obese and non-obese patients with AML who received HIDAC consolidation. Thirty-nine (41.9 %) patients received dose adjusted HIDAC in cycle 1. Nine of the 40 patients in the obese group received HIDAC dose-adjusted for obesity. The combined incidence of cycle delays, febrile neutropenia, or documented infection was 41.5 % in non-obese patients compared to 57.5 % in obese patients (p = 0.127). The median overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were not reached in both cohorts. The estimated 36-month overall survival was 76.4 % (95 % CI 0.623-0.905) in non-obese patients, compared to 66.1 % (95 % CI 0.472-0.85) in obese patients. There were no significant differences in safety or efficacy outcomes for obese versus non-obese patients who received HIDAC consolidation. For class III obesity, baseline dose-adjustments were more common.

Pediatric high-grade glioma (HGG, WHO Grade III and IV) is a devastating brain tumor with a median survival of less than two years. PDGFRA is frequently mutated/ amplified in pediatric HGG, but the significance of this finding has not been fully characterized. We hypothesize that alterations of PDGFRA will promote distinct prognostic and treatment implications in pediatric HGG. In order to characterize the impact of PDGFR pathway alterations, we integrated genomic data from pediatric HGG patients (n=290) from multiple pediatric datasets and sequencing platforms. Integration of multiple human datasets showed that PDGFRA mutation, but not amplification, was associated with older age in pediatric HGG (P=

Acute myeloid leukemia is a hematologic malignancy characterized by the clonal expansion of myeloid blasts in the peripheral blood, bone marrow, and other tissues. Prognosis is poor with 5-year survival rates ranging from 5–65% depending on demographic and clinical features. Outcomes are worse for patients that have an antecedent myeloproliferative neoplasm that evolves to acute myeloid leukemia, with a survival rate of 15 mg/dL).

Multiple BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are available for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), and several baseline and on-treatment predictive factors have been identified that can be used to help guide TKI selection for individual patients. In particular, early molecular response (EMR; BCR-ABL ≤10% on the International Scale at 3 months) has become an accepted benchmark for evaluating whether patients with CML-CP are responding optimally to frontline TKI therapy. Failure to achieve EMR is considered an inadequate initial response according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and a warning response according to the European LeukemiaNet recommendations. Here we review data supporting the importance of achieving EMR for improving patients' long-term outcomes and discuss key considerations for selecting a frontline TKI in light of these data. Because a higher proportion of patients achieve EMR with second-generation TKIs such as nilotinib and dasatinib than with imatinib, these TKIs may be preferable for many patients, particularly those with known negative prognostic factors at baseline. We also discuss other considerations for frontline TKI choice, including toxicities, cost-effectiveness, and the emerging goals of deep molecular response and treatment-free remission.

Context Secondary AML (sAML) represents up to 30% of total AML cases and is associated with a poor porgnosis. Response rates to traditional chemotherapy regimens are poor. Prior studies have shown that both fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (FLAG) and HMA-based regimens (e.g. decitabine ± venetoclax) can provide favorable responses with lower treatment related toxicities than traditional regimens such as 7+3 or CPX-351. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare response rates in patient with sAML receiving 10-day decitabine ± venetoclax to FLAG. Design Single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with sAML starting induction therapy at Michigan Medicine between January 2014 and July 2019. Setting Academic Medical Center. Patients or other participants Adult patients with sAML receiving first induction. Exclusion criteria as follows: receipt of prior therapy for this AML occurrence, or prior use of hypomethylating agent for antecedent hematologic disorder. Main outcome measures Complete response/Complete response with incomplete count recovery (CR/CRi) Results The median age was 73 (range, 37–80) in the decitabine ± venetoclax group and 67 (range, 27–82) in the FLAG group (p = 0.037). There was numerically lower but statistically similar CR/CRi rate in patients treated with decitabine ± venetoclax compared to FLAG (40 vs. 62%, p = 0.076). More patients in the decitabine ± venetoclax group achieved MLFS (25% vs. 1%, p = 0.002). The median overall survival was comparable in both groups (11.1 months, decitabine ± venetoclax vs. 9.5 months, FLAG; p = 0.472). There was a higher incidence of documented infections (20% vs. 55%, p = 0.01) with FLAG, despite days to absolute neutrophil count recovery being longer with decitabine ± venetoclax (median, 34 vs. 19 days; p Conclusions Response rates after FLAG and decitabine ± venetoclax are comparable and translate to similar overall survival in the sAML population in this real-world, single-center retrospective review. Larger studies are necessary to elucidate benefits of the individual regimens in the sAML patient population.

Effective practice of precision medicine in oncology relies on identifying and targeting unique characteristics of individual cancers. Coupling functional analysis with genomic screening will further enhance the selection of efficacious cancer therapies. Cancer is a heterogeneous disease that is defined by distinct capabilities, one of which is the evasion of apoptosis, controlled by the antiapoptotic protein members, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Mcl-1, and Bfl-1. These antiapoptotic proteins have become validated therapeutic targets, as manifested by the FDA-approved venetoclax, a selective Bcl-2 inhibitor, and several other molecules in clinical trials that target Mcl-1 and Bcl-xL. One of the translational challenges lies in predicting functional antiapoptotic dependence in a patient’s cancer and discriminating responders from nonresponders to Bcl-2 family targeted therapy. We have successfully characterized an updated array of Bcl-2 family antagonists, consisting of peptides and selective small-molecule BH3-mimetics via in vitro binding assays and functional analysis using model cell lymphoma cell lines. With this selective set of chemical tools, we employed the BH3 profiling assay across a wide spectrum of hematologic and solid tumor cell lines in order to functionally dissect survival dependence. To validate the results of BH3 profiling, we performed treatments with BH3-mimetics and analyzed their ability to induce apoptosis, which further demonstrated how cancers can be differentiated and targeted based on antiapoptotic dependence. The obtained data suggest that hematologic cancer cell lines mainly rely on Mcl-1 and Bcl-2 for survival and commonly undergo apoptosis in response to single-agent inhibitors of these proteins. Solid tumor cell lines are more dependent upon Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 and certain cell lines display increased involvement of Bfl-1. These cell lines undergo apoptosis when exposed to a combination of Bcl-xL/Mcl-1 inhibitors. Single agent-responsive solid tumor cell lines are less common but can be identified by BH3 profiling. This approach was successfully applied to primary patient samples to validate clinical utility. Further applications of dynamic BH3 profiling were explored to demonstrate how various FDA-approved therapies can alter antiapoptotic dependencies and aid in the design of rational combination therapies with BH3-mimetics. This work lays a translational foundation in the field of precision medicine by incorporating Bcl-2 protein family targeting into potential personalized cancer treatments. Citation Format: Karson J. Kump, Matthew Lieberman, Rita A. Avelar, Charles Foucar, Malathi Kandarpa, Antonio Di Cristofano, Russell J. Ryan, Sami N. Malek, Ryan A. Wilcox, Dale L. Bixby, Tycel J. Phillips, Moshe Talpaz, Analisa DiFeo, Zaneta Nikolovska-Coleska. Precision medicine strategy to elucidate and target Bcl-2 prosurvival proteins in a wide spectrum of cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advancing Precision Medicine Drug Development: Incorporation of Real-World Data and Other Novel Strategies; Jan 9-12, 2020; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(12_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 10.

7510 Background: CPX-351 (Vyxeos; daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome for injection), a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine [C] and daunorubicin [D], is approved by the FDA and EMA for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. Primary analysis of the pivotal phase 3 study (NCT01696084) that formed the basis for these approvals evaluated patients (pts) aged 60-75 y with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary AML and found that CPX-351 significantly improved median overall survival (OS) vs conventional 7+3, with a comparable safety profile. Here, we report the prospectively planned final 5-y follow-up results from this phase 3 study. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive ≤2 induction cycles of CPX-351 (100 units/m2 [C 100 mg/m2 + D 44 mg/m2] as a 90-min infusion on Days 1, 3, 5 [2nd induction: Days 1, 3]) or 7+3 (C 100 mg/m2/d continuously for 7 d + D 60 mg/m2 on Days 1-3 [2nd induction: 5+2]). Pts achieving complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete platelet or neutrophil recovery could receive up to 2 consolidation cycles. Pts could receive a hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) at the physician’s discretion. Pts were followed until death or up to 5 y following randomization. Results: In total, 309 pts were randomized to CPX-351 (n = 153) or 7+3 (n = 156). The survival rate at 5 y was higher for CPX-351 vs 7+3 (18% vs 8%; Table). Among pts who died, the most common primary cause of death was progressive leukemia in both arms (CPX-351: 56%; 7+3: 53%). After a median follow-up of 60.65 mo, improved median OS with CPX-351 vs 7+3 was maintained: 9.33 vs 5.95 mo; Kaplan-Meier (KM) OS curves plateaued at ~30 mo. HCT was received by 53 (35%) vs 39 (25%) pts after CPX-351 vs 7+3; among these pts, the survival rate at 5 y was higher for CPX-351 vs 7+3 (52% vs 23%), and median OS landmarked from the HCT date was not reached for CPX-351 vs 10.25 mo for 7+3 (Table). Conclusions: After 5 y of follow-up, improved OS was maintained in this phase 3 study, supporting that CPX-351 has the ability to produce or contribute to long-term remission and survival in older pts with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary AML. Clinical trial information: NCT01696084 . [Table: see text]

Purpose CPX-351 is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin that delivers a synergistic 5:1 drug ratio into leukemia cells to a greater extent than normal bone marrow cells. Prior clinical studies demonstrated a sustained drug ratio and exposure in vivo and prolonged survival versus standard-of-care cytarabine plus daunorubicin chemotherapy (7+3 regimen) in older patients with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Patients and Methods In this open-label, randomized, phase III trial, 309 patients age 60 to 75 years with newly diagnosed high-risk/sAML received one to two induction cycles of CPX-351 or 7+3 followed by consolidation therapy with a similar regimen. The primary end point was overall survival. Results CPX-351 significantly improved median overall survival versus 7+3 (9.56 v 5.95 months; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.90; one-sided P = .003). Overall remission rate was also significantly higher with CPX-351 versus 7+3 (47.7% v 33.3%; two-sided P = .016). Improved outcomes were observed across age-groups and AML subtypes. The incidences of nonhematologic adverse events were comparable between arms, despite a longer treatment phase and prolonged time to neutrophil and platelet count recovery with CPX-351. Early mortality rates with CPX-351 and 7+3 were 5.9% and 10.6% (two-sided P = .149) through day 30 and 13.7% and 21.2% (two-sided P = .097) through day 60. Conclusion CPX-351 treatment is associated with significantly longer survival compared with conventional 7+3 in older adults with newly diagnosed sAML. The safety profile of CPX-351 was similar to that of conventional 7+3 therapy.

Patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) have poor outcomes, with CR/CRi rates of 25-35% with standard 7 + 3 induction chemotherapy, while single center non-comparative analyses suggest promising outcomes with FLAG. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes in treatment-naïve patients with sAML treated with fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (FLAG, n = 40) compared with 7 + 3 (n = 66). Median patient age was 63 years (range: 27-82) in the FLAG group and 60 years (range: 21-76) in the 7 + 3 group (P = 0.968). Patients treated with FLAG achieved higher overall response rates (CR + CRi + MLFS) compared to 7 + 3 (70% vs. 48%, P = 0.043). FLAG was well tolerated, with only one induction death (30-day mortality rate, 3% vs. 8%, P = 0.405) and no cases of cerebellar toxicity. Duration of neutropenia was significantly shorter with FLAG (median 16 vs. 23 days, P 0.001). Half of the FLAG-treated patients proceeded to consolidative therapy compared with only 27% of those who received 7 + 3 (P = 0.022). Overall survival was comparable between groups (8.5 mos, FLAG vs. 9.1 mos, 7 + 3; P = 0.798). Thus, FLAG may represent a low-cost treatment strategy in sAML that produces higher response rates and promising survival outcomes with minimal treatment-related toxicity. Further studies are required to prospectively compare FLAG to the newly FDA-approved CPX-351 in sAML.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been increasingly used in the setting of FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3)-mutated AML. However, its role in conferring durable relapse-free intervals remains in question. Herein we sought to investigate FLT3 mutational status on transplant outcomes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 262 consecutive AML patients who underwent first-time allogeneic HCT (2008-2014), of whom 171 had undergone FLT3-ITD (internal tandem duplication) mutational testing. FLT3-mutated AML was associated with nearly twice the relapse risk (RR) compared with those without FLT3 mutation 3 years post-HCT (63% vs 37%, P

BACKGROUND Secondary AML (sAML) that develops after an antecedent hematologic disorder or exposure to genotoxic therapy is associated with a poor prognosis and historical long-term survival rates of 5-10% (Granfeldt Østgård et al. 2015). Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351) was recently FDA approved for the treatment of sAML, based on a randomized phase III trial that found a higher complete remission (CR) rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) with CPX-351 compared to 7+3 chemotherapy (Lancet et al. 2018). Retrospective studies conducted in this patient population suggest that high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC)-based regimens may also be safe and effective in sAML (Vulaj et al. 2018, Talati et al. 2018). With an average wholesale price of up to $150,000 for induction, CPX-351 represents a large financial burden when compared to HIDAC-based regimens. Because HIDAC-based regimens employ older, generic medications, and sAML is a relatively rare diagnosis, it is unlikely these two induction strategies will be compared prospectively. This real-world, multicenter study retrospectively compared clinical outcomes in patients with sAML receiving CPX-351 and HIDAC-based regimens. METHODS Adult patients with newly diagnosed sAML treated between January 2013 and January 2019 from 7 academic medical centers (University of Michigan n=73, MD Anderson Cancer Center n=27, Barnes Jewish Hospital n=22, University of North Carolina n=21, Huntsman Cancer Institute n=9, University of Rochester n=9, Indiana University n=8) were divided into 2 cohorts based on induction regimen: HIDAC-based or CPX-351. Demographics, disease characteristics, and outcomes were collected in accordance with the institutional review board approved protocol. The primary endpoint of composite complete response/complete response with incomplete count recovery (CR/CRi) as well as secondary efficacy endpoints were defined using 2003 International Working Group Criteria. For the primary endpoint, a sample of 96 patients was established a priori as necessary to demonstrate non-inferiority of HIDAC-based regimens using a non-inferiority margin of 7.5% and historical CR/CRi rates or 65% and 47.7% for HIDAC-based and CPX-351 respectively. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were utilized to evaluate dichotomous variables. Continuous variables were analyzed via Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was performed to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 169 patients were included (HIDAC-based: n=75; CPX-351: n=94). HIDAC-based regimen distribution was as follows: fludarabine/cytarabine ± G-CSF (n=73) and clofarabine/cytarabine ± G-CSF (n=2). Baseline characteristics were well balanced (table 1) with the exception of a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index in patients who received HIDAC-based therapy. The median age of all patients was 67 years and the majority of patients had sAML due to an antecedent hematologic disorder. CR/CRi rate was numerically higher and non-inferior with HIDAC-based therapy (62.7%) compared with CPX-351 (47.9%) (p=0.002 [one-sided for non-inferiority]). Median OS was 10.06 vs 10.59 months and median EFS was 5.56 vs 4.11 months with HIDAC-based regimens compared with CPX-351, respectively. Thirty-day mortality (1.3 vs 8.5%; p=0.039) and confirmed infection in induction (56% vs 74.5%; p=0.012) were significantly higher with CPX-351. Additionally, the time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and platelet count (PLT) recovery in CR/CRi were significantly longer with CPX (ANC: 18 vs 35.5 days; p CONCLUSIONS HIDAC-based regimens yield CR/CRi rates that are non-inferior to CPX-351 in patients with sAML with similar EFS and OS. In a primarily elderly population, HIDAC-based therapy demonstrates greater tolerability with lower induction mortality, infection rates, and a more favorable duration of cytopenias. With non-inferior efficacy, better tolerability, and significantly lower cost, HIDAC-based regimens may be preferred to CPX-351 in patients with sAML. Disclosures Klaus: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau. Clark:Elliott Benson Research: Consultancy. Pettit:Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding.

e18514 Background: Patients (pts) sAML have poor outcomes (CR/CRi= 25-35%) with standard 7+3 induction chemotherapy (7+3). CPX-351 (liposomal encapsulated daunorubicin + cytarabine at a synergistic 5:1 molar ratio) was approved recently for sAML based on improvements in CR/CRi and survival but high cost and toxicity has discouraged its use. FLAG (fludarabine + high-dose cytarabine + granulocyte colony stimulating factor) have emerged as a lower cost, safe alternatives; however, outcomes between CPX-351 and FLAG have yet to be compared. In the absence of a direct trial, we aimed to estimate indirectly by Bayesian NMA the comparative efficacy of CPX-351, FLAG, and 7+3 therapy for sAML patients. Methods: Publications that compared FLAG or CPX-351 to 7+3 in newly diagnosed sAML were identified through a search of PubMed. CR/CRi rates were used in a Bayesian NMA to assess the direct (CPX-351 vs 7+3; FLAG vs 7+3) and indirect (CPX-351 vs FLAG) comparative efficacy of these regimens. Fixed (FE) and random effect (RE) analyses were conducted to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible interval (CrI). Results: Of 169 identified articles, four studies (three RCT and one retrospective cohort) on a total of 781 pts in three treatment arms were retained. NMA showed no significant difference in pooled CR/CRi rates between CPX-351 and FLAG in both FE and RE models. However, pts receiving either FLAG or CPX-351 had significantly higher CR/CRi than those receiving 7+3 in both FE and RE models as shown in the table. Conclusions: This NMA suggests that both CPX-351 and FLAG prevail in CR/CRi efficacy over 7+3. In indirect comparison, CPX-351 and FLAG are equivalent in efficacy. The cost implications of these results remain to be established. [Table: see text]

This article reviews recent clinical experiences with first-line and second-line second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitors and discusses considerations for selection of therapy for patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.We reviewed recent publications on PubMed and abstracts from major congresses relevant to the topic.Therapeutic options for front-line treatment have increased with the approval of two second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitors, dasatinib and nilotinib. Both agents are also treatment options for patients with resistance or intolerance to front-line imatinib. More recently, bosutinib, ponatinib, and omacetaxine have also been approved for patients with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy.Expanded treatment options coupled with rapidly changing treatment guidelines have led to numerous questions regarding the selection and monitoring of therapy. Common concerns include how to best select therapy based upon patient-specific comorbidities, monitoring and interpretation of treatment outcomes, and optimization of dosing when side effects occur.

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib are the standard of care for treating patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Compared with interferon-based treatment, the previous standard of care, imatinib is associated with significantly higher cytogenetic response rates and prolonged overall survival. Nilotinib and dasatinib, both newer and more potent TKIs, significantly improve cytogenetic and molecular response rates compared with imatinib. Despite significant advances in CML treatment enabled by the TKIs, a fraction of patients who receive frontline treatment with a TKI demonstrate inadequate response. The reasons for this vary, but in many cases, inadequate response can be attributed to non-adherence to the treatment regimen, intolerance to the drug, intrinsic or acquired resistance to the drug, or a combination of reasons. More often than not, strategies to improve response necessitate a change in treatment plan, either a dose adjustment or a switch to an alternate drug, particularly in the case of drug intolerance or drug resistance. Improved physician-patient communication and patient education are effective strategies to address issues relating to adherence and intolerance. Because inadequate response to TKI treatment correlates with poor long-term outcomes, it is imperative that patients who experience intolerance or who fail to achieve appropriate responses are carefully evaluated so that appropriate treatment modifications can be made to maximize the likelihood of positive long-term outcome.

This study evaluated the impact of antibacterial prophylaxis with levofloxacin in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. Adult patients with relapsed/refractory AML admitted for reinduction chemotherapy between November 1, 2006 and June 15, 2015 were screened for inclusion. A protocol initiating levofloxacin prophylaxis was implemented on December 1, 2013. Patients receiving hypomethylating agents (decitabine/azacitidine) were not administered antibacterial prophylaxis and thus not included in this analysis. Patients receiving broad spectrum antibiotics on day 1 of reinduction chemotherapy or receiving another antibacterial agent for prophylaxis were also excluded. Ninety-seven patients were included in the control group (no prophylaxis), while 48 patients received levofloxacin prophylaxis. Patients in the prophylaxis group received levofloxacin 500 mg once daily on day 1 of chemotherapy and continued until neutrophil recovery (or hospital discharge or death). There was a reduction in the rate of bacteremia in the prophylaxis group (37.5 %) compared to the control group (53.6 %, p = 0.0789), largely due to a reduction in gram-negative bacteremia (2.1 vs. 21.6 % respectively, p = 0.001). No difference was found between prophylaxis and the control groups in the incidence of neutropenic fever, incidence of multidrug resistance, length of hospital or ICU stay, or mortality. Levofloxacin prophylaxis reduced the rate of infections overall in adult patients with relapsed/refractory AML, without increasing rates of multidrug-resistant organisms.

Introduction: SY-1425 (tamibarotene) is an orally available, synthetic retinoid in Phase 2 development for non-APL AML and MDS patients (pts) positive for the RARA and/or IRF8 biomarkers of RARA pathway activation (McKeown et al, Cancer Discovery, 2017). Biomarker-selected pts treated with SY-1425 single agent showed myeloid differentiation, improved blood counts and reduced bone marrow blasts, and treatment was generally well tolerated with manageable and/or reversible side effects (Jurcic et al, ASH 2017). SY-1425 showed evidence of combination activity in preclinical models. Synergy was observed with HMAs, with DNA damage and apoptosis in vitro, and in an AML PDX model the combination of SY-1425 and azacitidine (Aza) demonstrated increased tumor reduction, deeper, more durable responses and improved survival relative to Aza or SY-1425 alone (McKeown et al, ASH 2016). SY-1425 induced CD38 expression in preclinical models and the combination with daratumumab (Dara), a CD38 targeting antibody indicated for multiple myeloma (MM), induced immune-mediated cell death ex vivo (Austgen et al, AACR 2017). SY-1425 also increased CD38 expression in bone marrow blasts in AML/MDS pts (Jurcic et al, ASH 2017). These data support the ongoing investigation of the efficacy and safety of SY-1425 in non-APL AML and MDS pts, in combination with Aza or Dara (NCT02807558). Methods: Biomarker positive (Bm+), unfit pts with newly-diagnosed (ND) AML received SY-1425 + Aza. The SY-1425 + Aza combination arm was recently expanded to include biomarker negative pts. Bm+ pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML or R/R higher-risk MDS received SY-1425 + Dara. All enrolled pts received SY-1425 at 6 mg/m2/day PO with twice daily dosing. Aza (75 mg/m2 IV/SC) and Dara (16 mg/kg IV) were dosed as approved in MDS and MM, respectively. Objectives included characterization of activity by overall response rate (per IWG), duration of response, event-free, relapse-free and overall survival, hematologic improvement, and assessment of safety. For pts treated with SY-1425 + Dara, the kinetics and magnitude of CD38 increases were evaluated on peripheral blasts using a centralized assay. Results: With 10 ND AML pts currently enrolled to receive SY-1425 + Aza, 6 were Bm+. Data through 9 July 2018 were available for 5 Bm+ pts, 4 (80%) male and median age 76 years (64-83). Pts were reported to have poor (3 pts) and intermediate (2 pts) ELN genetic risk. Median time on treatment was 25.4 weeks (9.7-42.1). Early clinical responses at 4 weeks (C2D1) were reported in 4 of 5 pts. Best responses were CR (1 pt), CRi (1 pt) and PRi (2 pts), defined as PR with incomplete blood count recovery. A 5th pt with ND AML developing from prior CMML with 2 distinct blast populations had stable disease (AML blasts), but with CR of CMML marrow blasts by flow at 8 weeks (C3D1). 2 pts remained on treatment, including 1 with CR at 9 months (C10D1). 3 pts discontinued due to PD/lack of efficacy (2 pts) and AE (1 pt). 10 Bm+ pts have enrolled to receive SY-1425 + Dara. Data were available for 4 pts (3 R/R AML and 1 R/R MDS), 4 (100%) female and median age 60 years (36-68). Pt risk was poor (2 pts) and intermediate (1 pt) per ELN for AML, and good (1 pt) per IPSS-R for MDS. Median time on treatment was 5.9 weeks (0.7-8.9). 1 of 3 evaluable pts achieved a PRi at 4 weeks (C2D1) but progressed at C3D1. Initial data demonstrate that 3 of 4 pts showed an increase in CD38 expression levels in peripheral AML blasts as early as 3 days following SY-1425 treatment, up to 2.6-fold by 1 week. All 4 pts discontinued treatment due to disease progression. AEs (most common, all causality) reported in >2 pts receiving SY-1425 combination treatment included febrile neutropenia (44%), and hypertriglyceridemia, pruritus, abdominal pain and peripheral edema (33% each). Overall, AEs, including AEs ≥ grade 3 and SAEs, were consistent with those of single agent SY-1425, Aza or Dara. Conclusion: SY-1425 in combination with Aza in non-APL AML shows preliminary evidence of clinical activity with early objective responses observed. CD38 expression increased in 3 of 4 pts with R/R AML or R/R MDS within 3 days of SY-1425 treatment and reduction in marrow blasts was observed in 1 pt treated with SY-1425 in combination with Dara. No new safety signals have been identified with either combination regimen. In summary, early data suggest SY-1425 in combination has clinical potential in pts with non-APL AML and MDS. Updated results will be presented. Disclosures Cook: Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Liesveld:Abbvie: Honoraria; Onconova: Other: DSMB. Rizzieri:Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Arog: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy. Stein:Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Roboz:Argenx: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Aphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy; Aphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy. Sekeres:Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jurcic:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Raza:Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Geoptix: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Syros: Research Funding. Bixby:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding. Stephens:Syros Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Volkert:Syros Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kang:Syros Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Di Tomaso:Syros Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Roth:Syros Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Background Binding of E-selectin (E-sel) to sialyl Lex on the leukemic cell surface activates cell survival pathways and promotes chemotherapy resistance in AML. Expression of the E-sel ligand (E-sel-L) is associated with increased relapse and poor survival. Uproleselan (GMI-1271), a novel E-sel antagonist, disrupts cell survival pathway activation, enhances chemotherapy response and protects from toxicity with improved survival in vivo. We added uproleselan to mitoxantrone, etoposide, cytarabine (MEC) chemotherapy for R/R AML patients (pts) and to cytarabine and idarubicin (7+3) induction for older, treatment naïve (TN) AML pts. Here we report on final outcomes and correlative studies. Methods A Phase (Ph) 1/2 trial evaluated safety and efficacy of escalating doses of upro (5-20 mg/kg) combined with MEC in pts with R/R AML. The recommended Ph 2 dose (RP2D) was 10 mg/kg. Ph 2 added pts ≥60 yrs with TN AML treated with upro and 7+3. Uproleselan was given 24 hrs prior, every 12 hrs during and 48 hrs post chemotherapy. Responders could receive consolidation therapy (1 cycle MEC or 1-3 cycles IDAC) with uproleselan. Baseline E-sel-L expression on AML blasts (CD45+,SSC) and leukemic stem cells (LSC, CD34+CD38-CD123+) in blood and bone marrow (BM) was assessed by flow cytometry, for percentage of blasts binding to E-sel-Fc chimeric protein and HECA452 (antibody to sialyl Lex). Post-induction measurable residual disease (MRD-/MRD+) was assessed locally. Results 91 pts were enrolled (Ph 1 R/R=19; Ph 2 R/R=47. TN=25). Median age in R/R pts was 59 yrs (26-84) with 22/66 (33%) primary refractory, 22 (33%) CR1 Median age in TN pts was 67 yrs (60-79). 48% had adverse risk (ELN) and 52% secondary AML (sAML). Uproleselan was well tolerated, with no increase in adverse events, no Grade 3/4 mucositis, and mortality 8% (30d) and 12% (60d). CR/CRi was 72% (all), and 69% (sAML). 5/9 (56%) evaluable pts were MRD-. 19/25 (76%) proceeded to further anti-leukemic therapy; 11 (44%) proceeded to SCT. Median (95% CI) EFS, OS, and remission duration were 9.2 m (3.0-12.6), 12.6 m (9.9-NR), and 10.4 m (7.1-17.8) respectively; 1-year OS was 52%. For sAML, median (95% CI) EFS and OS were 7.7 m (1.1-9.5) and 10.5m (4.4-NR), respectively. For TN/MRD-, 1-year OS was 60%. E-sel-L was detectable on BM blasts in all 24 evaluable pts: median expression 31% (2-92) of blasts. In a subset of MRD evaluable pts (N=8), E-sel-L expression was higher in those who were MRD+ (35% vs 8%). In BM blasts (Figure N=24), LSC expression of E-sel-L correlated with blast E-sel-L (R2=0.87, p Conclusion The addition of uproleselan to chemotherapy was well tolerated, with low oral mucositis rates, high remission rates, high MRD- and transplant rates, and promising survival outcomes in pts with R/R and TN AML. High E-sel-L expression is associated with improved remission and survival with uproleselan treatment in R/R AML. Phase III studies in pts with R/R and (older) TN AML are underway. Figure. Figure. Disclosures DeAngelo: Shire: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jonas:Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Accelerated Medical Diagnostics: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Esanex: Research Funding; Tolero: Consultancy; Kalobios: Research Funding; LP Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Liesveld:Onconova: Other: DSMB; Abbvie: Honoraria. Bixby:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding. Advani:Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Marlton:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. O'Dwyer:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Onkimmune: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fogler:GlycoMimetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wolfgang:GlycoMimetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Magnani:GlycoMimetics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thackray:GlycoMimetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Becker:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding.

Intro: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous clonal hematopoietic neoplasm. The cytogenetic changes associated with AML impact response rate and survival, and is one of the most important independent prognostic factors. AML with inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or; GATA2, MECOMaccounts for 1-2% of all forms of AML. This form is associated with a younger age at diagnosis, poor response to standard induction chemotherapy, and very poor long-term prognosis with an overall survival of Methods: We conducted a single-center, IRB-approved, retrospective cohort analysis of 939 patients who received therapy for AML at the University of Michigan between March 2005-June 2018. 15/939 (1.6%) patients tested positive for inv(3)(q21.3q26.2), and they were divided into two cohorts: a lenalidomide-based regimen or other chemotherapy induction approaches. Data abstraction of patient, disease and treatment-related variables was performed through manual chart review. The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR), reported as the combination of complete remission (CR) and complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), 30- and 60-day mortality, event free survival (EFS), and duration of response. All data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 24.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Results: In total, 15 patients were positive for inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) and underwent treatment at the University of Michigan. 4/16 (25%) received lenalidomide and HMA as primary therapy. Patient demographics and lab values at diagnosis are shown in Table 1. 4/4 (100%) of patients receiving lenalidomide with HMA as first line therapy achieved CR/CRi while 3/11 (27.3%) of patients receiving other chemotherapeutic agents initially achieved CR/CRi (p=0.0256). Duration of response was numerically longer in patients receiving lenalidomide-based therapies (7.4 months vs. 1.45 months; p=0.057). Primary and secondary outcomes in patients receiving lenalidomide plus HMA and other chemotherapies are shown in Table 2. 2/13 patients requiring salvage therapy received lenalidomide with HMA. Both of these patients achieved CR/CRi, while 3/11 (27.3%) of patients receiving other chemotherapy achieved CR/CRi. Combining initial and salvage inductions, 6/6 (100%) achieved CR/CRi with lenalidomide with HMA versus 6/22 (27.3%) with other chemotherapy (p=0.0025). Discussion: AML with inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2); GATA2, MECOMis notorious for a poor response to standard induction chemotherapy and a reported remission rate of 10-20% with traditional chemotherapy (Raya et al. Hematology 2015;20(8):435-441).In this cohort, all patients who received lenalidomide with or without a HMA achieved CR/CRi compared to 27% of patients receiving other chemotherapy. Importantly, the median duration of response with lenalidomide and HMA was longer than traditional chemotherapy, although not statistically significant, likely due to the small sample size. The high ORR and reasonable duration of response could allow for potentially curative alloHCT in these high-risk AML patients. Our study is limited by the small sample size due to the rarity of this AML subtype, but the initial data suggests that lenalidomide plus HMA is a promising approach for patients with AML with inv(3)(q21.3q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21.3;q26.2); GATA2, MECOM. A multicenter, prospective trial should be considered to compare the efficacy of traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy approaches versus lenalidomide plus HMA to improve outcomes in this subtype of AML. Disclosures Bixby: GlycoMimetics: Research Funding.

Background: Outcomes for the treatment of AML with conventional induction chemotherapy (eg, 7+3 cytarabine/daunorubicin regimen) are poor for older adults and those with high-risk/secondary AML. CPX-351 (Vyxeos®), a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin in a synergistic ratio, was approved by the US FDA in 2017 for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes and is currently under review by the EMA. A large randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01696084) evaluated the efficacy and safety of CPX-351 versus conventional 7+3 chemotherapy in adults aged 60-75 y with newly diagnosed, high-risk/secondary AML (Lancet JE, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018). In this study, CPX-351 significantly improved median overall survival (OS; primary endpoint) versus 7+3 (9.56 vs 5.95 mo; HR = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.52-0.90]; 1-sided P = 0.003), as well as event-free survival (EFS; 2.53 vs 1.31 mo; HR = 0.74 [95% CI: 0.58-0.96]; 2-sided P = 0.021). CPX-351 was also associated with higher rates of complete remission (CR; 37.3% vs 25.6%; 2-sided P = 0.040) and CR or CR with incomplete platelet or neutrophil recovery (CR+CRi; 47.7% vs 33.3%; 2-sided P = 0.016) versus 7+3, which likely contributed to the higher rate of patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with CPX-351 (34.0% vs 25.0%; 2-sided P = 0.098). HCT is a potentially curative therapy, and the higher rate of HCT observed in the CPX-351 arm could therefore have an impact on long-term survival outcomes. To better understand the contribution of HCT and treatment with CPX-351 versus 7+3 to survival, exploratory analyses using a time-dependent proportional hazards model were performed to evaluate survival in patients who underwent HCT and assess the impact of treatment with CPX-351 versus 7+3 on survival independent of HCT status. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive up to 2 induction cycles with CPX-351 (100 units/m2 [cytarabine 100 mg/m2 + daunorubicin 44 mg/m2] on Days 1, 3, and 5 [2nd induction: Days 1 and 3]) or 7+3 (cytarabine 100 mg/m2/d continuously for 7 d [2nd induction: 5 d] + daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 on Days 1-3 [2nd induction: Days 1-2]). Patients achieving CR or CRi could receive up to 2 consolidations with CPX-351 (65 units/m2 [cytarabine 65 mg/m2 + daunorubicin 29 mg/m2] on Days 1 and 3) or 5+2 (as in 2nd induction). Patients could receive HCT at the discretion of the treating physician. Results: A total of 309 patients were enrolled in the study (CPX-351: n = 153; 7+3: n = 156), and baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. A total of 52 (34.0%) patients in the CPX-351 arm and 39 (25.0%) in the 7+3 arm underwent HCT; most were 60-69 y of age (CPX-351: 69.2%; 7+3: 84.6%), had ECOG performance status ≤1 (CPX-351: 92.3%; 7+3: 94.9%), and were in CR (CPX-351: 57.7%; 7+3: 48.7%) or CRi (CPX-351: 19.2%; 7+3: 12.8%). Median time to HCT from first study dose was similar with CPX-351 (114.5 d) and 7+3 (113.0 d). Similar to the primary endpoint analysis, median OS landmarked from the time of HCT was significantly improved with CPX-351 versus 7+3 (not reached vs 10.25 mo; HR = 0.46 [95% CI: 0.24-0.89]). Further, in the current exploratory analyses in which HCT was treated as a time-dependent covariate, the HRs remained strongly in favor of CPX-351 versus 7+3 for OS (HR = 0.71) and EFS (HR = 0.74), with the upper bounds of the 95% CIs below 1.0 (Table). These results suggest CPX-351 may be associated with prolonged OS and EFS that is independent of HCT. The adverse event profile of CPX-351 was generally consistent with the known safety profile of conventional 7+3. Grade 3-5 adverse events reported in ≥10% of patients in the CPX-351 or 7+3 cohorts included febrile neutropenia (68.0% vs 70.9%), pneumonia (19.6% vs 14.6%), and hypoxia (13.1% vs 15.2%). Early mortality rates with CPX-351 and 7+3, respectively, were 5.9% and 10.6% at Day 30 and 13.7% and 21.2% at Day 60. Conclusions: Treatment with CPX-351 was associated with significantly longer median OS and EFS, as well as a higher proportion of patients achieving remission and undergoing HCT, compared with conventional 7+3 chemotherapy in this population of older patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk/secondary AML. Further, while it is expected that HCT had a positive impact on survival in this study, exploratory analyses suggest that CPX-351 produced positive OS and EFS outcomes independent of HCT. Disclosures Lin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding. Ritchie:NS Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stuart:Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Bayer AG: Research Funding; Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Strickland:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bixby:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding. Kolitz:Magellan Health: Consultancy, Honoraria. Schiller:bluebird bio: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wieduwilt:Leadiant: Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Merck: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ryan:University of Rochester: Patents & Royalties; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Ryan:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Other: Stock and stock options. Chiarella:Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Louie:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Uy:GlycoMimetics: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy.