Search

International audience; The farnesoid X receptor (FXR, NR1H4), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors, is normally produced in the liver and the gastrointestinal tract, where it acts as a bile acid sensor. It has been recently detected in breast cancer cell lines and tissue specimens. The expression of FXR was scored (0–8) by immunohistochemistry on 204 breast cancer samples and correlated with established cancer biomarkers. Moreover, the effect of the FXR activator chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) was determined on cell proliferation and estrogen receptor regulation/activation in breast cancer cell lines. FXR was detected in 82.4% of samples with a high median expression score of 5. FXR expression significantly correlated with estrogen receptor (ER) expression ( = 0.009) and luminal-like markers. In ER-positive tumors, FXR expression was significantly correlated with the proliferation marker Ki-67 (

PURPOSE: There is growing evidence that interaction between stromal and tumor cells is pivotal in breast cancer progression and response to therapy. Based on earlier research suggesting that during breast cancer progression, striking changes occur in CD10(+) stromal cells, we aimed to better characterize this cell population and its clinical relevance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We developed a CD10(+) stroma gene expression signature (using HG U133 Plus 2.0) on the basis of the comparison of CD10 cells isolated from tumoral (n = 28) and normal (n = 3) breast tissue. We further characterized the CD10(+) cells by coculture experiments of representative breast cancer cell lines with the different CD10(+) stromal cell types (fibroblasts, myoepithelial, and mesenchymal stem cells). We then evaluated its clinical relevance in terms of in situ to invasive progression, invasive breast cancer prognosis, and prediction of efficacy of chemotherapy using publicly available data sets. RESULTS: This 12-gene CD10(+) stroma signature includes, among others, genes involved in matrix remodeling (MMP11, MMP13, and COL10A1) and genes related to osteoblast differentiation (periostin). The coculture experiments showed that all 3 CD10(+) cell types contribute to the CD10(+) stroma signature, although mesenchymal stem cells have the highest CD10(+) stroma signature score. Of interest, this signature showed an important role in differentiating in situ from invasive breast cancer, in prognosis of the HER2(+) subpopulation of breast cancer only, and potentially in nonresponse to chemotherapy for those patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the importance of CD10(+) cells in breast cancer prognosis and efficacy of chemotherapy, particularly within the HER2(+) breast cancer disease. Clin Cancer Res; 18(4); 1004-14. ©2012 AACR., JOURNAL ARTICLE, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Aberrant microRNA (miRNA) expression is associated with cancer and has potential diagnostic and prognostic value in various malignancies. In this study, we investigated miRNA profiling as a complementary tool to improve our understanding of breast cancer (BC) biology and to assess whether miRNA expression could predict clinical outcome of BC patients., In Vitro, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) detection and phenotyping are currently evaluated in Breast Cancer (BC). Tumor cell dissemination has been suggested to occur early in BC progression. To interrogate dissemination in BC, we studied CTCs and HER2 expression on CTCs across the spectrum of BC staging., Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a metabolic nuclear receptor expressed in the liver and traditionally considered as a bile acid sensor. Yet, FXR has been recently demonstrated in other tissues and cells, such as the kidneys, the adrenals, and arterial smooth muscle cells. Immunohistochemical data reported in this study point to the expression of FXR in human breast cancer. In addition, FXR expression was also found by Western blotting and immunofluorescence microscopy in breast-cancer-derived cell lines MCF-7 (estrogen receptor [ER]-positive) and MDA-MB-231 (ER-negative). The FXR activator farnesol, a mevalonate pathway intermediate, exerts a mitogenic effect on MCF-7 cells. The growth stimulation is completely suppressed by antiestrogens. In contrast, MDA-MB-231 cells appear farnesol-insensitive, suggesting an involvement of ER in farnesol mitogenicity. In accordance with this interpretation, farnesol induces in MCF-7 cells a decrease of ER level, consistent with a phenomenon of receptor downregulation. Farnesol also increases progesterone receptor (PgR) expression in MCF-7 cells and stimulates ER-mediated gene transactivation in MVLN cells (MCF-7 cells stably transfected with an ER reporter gene). Of note, both effects of farnesol on ER expression and activity are completely suppressed by antiestrogens. In addition, farnesol-induced PgR is markedly reduced by FXR gene silencing (siRNA), demonstrating the involvement of FXR in the estrogenic effects of farnesol. Finally, coimmunoprecipitation experiments (FXR immunoprecipitation followed by Western blot analysis of ER in the immunoprecipitate) produced definite evidence that FXR interacts with ER. Altogether, these observations reveal the hitherto unreported presence of FXR in breast cancer and show that the latter receptor functionally interacts with ER. The occurrence of such a crosstalk calls for some caution regarding the pharmacological use of FXR agonists.

Both bisphosphonates and radiotherapy are highly effective for the management of bone metastases. Our in vitro study examined the cytotoxic effects resulting from combinations of ibandronate and ionising radiations (RX) in various sequences on breast cancer cells. Single radiation doses were given before, at halftime of, or after acute ibandronate incubation (48 h). Single or fractionated radiation doses were applied at the end of chronic ibandronate incubation (5 weeks). Combination of acute ibandronate exposure and single radiation doses led to synergistic cytotoxic effects in MDA-MB-231 cell line, but only with low ibandronate concentrations in MCF-7 cell line. In both cell lines, synergy was more marked when ibandronate followed RX. After long-term ibandronate exposure, only high single radiation doses induced synergistic effects in MDA-MB-231 cell line. Synergy was only detected with low ibandronate concentrations in MCF-7 cell line. In both cell lines, fractionated radiation doses exerted similar effects. The combination of ibandronate with radiation can exert synergistic effects on the inhibition of breast cancer cells growth, depending on cell line, drug sequence and dosage. Our data might provide a rationale for associating bisphosphonates and radiotherapy for the treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer.

SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Gastrin (G17) belongs to the cholecystokinin (CCK) peptide family widely distributed in the brain, and we were the first to show that it significantly modulates the growth and migration features of tumor astyrocytes. Conflictual data have been published as to whether CCKA, CCKB and CCKC receptors are, or are not, present in tumors of the central and peripheral nervous system (CPNS) in general, and in gliomas in particular. In the present study we employed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on a series of 29 CNPS tumors, including 20 gliomas (17 astrocytic and 3 oligodendroglial tumors), 4 schwannomas and 5 meningiomas to investigate whether RNAs were present or absent in the case of these CCKA, CCKB and CCKC receptors. The presence of the three CCK receptor subtypes was also assayed on three experimental models, i.e. the U373 human glioma, the C6 rat glioma and the 9L rat gliosarcoma. The data show that 9/20 (45%) of the gliomas exhibited RNAs for the CCKB receptor as did the C6 rat glioma, 13/20 (65%) RNAs for the CCKC receptor as did the U373 human glioma and the 9L rat gliosarcoma. Of the 20 gliomas, 17 (85%) expressed RNAs for either the CCKB or the CCKC receptor (or both), a feature which was also observed in the experimental models. One schwannoma and one meningioma exhibited RNAs for the CCKB receptor, while 4/4 schwannomas and 4/5 meningiomas showed RNAs for the CCKC receptor. None of the gliomas, schwannomas or meningiomas exhibited RNAs for the CCKA receptor, which were found in the 9L rat gliosarcoma model only. These data emphasize that 85% of the gliomas under study and 86% (25/29) of the tumors of the central and peripheral nervous system exhibited CCKB and/or CCKC receptors. This therefore suggests an important role for gastrin in the biological development of these tumors.

Purpose: The methodology we propose combines the immunohistochemical determination of the oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PgR) with the characterization of the oestradiol- and progesterone-induced influence on cell proliferation in breast cancers in order to characterize their steroid hormone sensitivity at both the “static” and “dynamic” level. Methods: ER and PgR have been immunohistochemically quantified by means of computer-assisted microscopy. Cell proliferation has been determined by means of tritiated thymidine autoradiography in tumour samples maintained in vitro as organotypic cultures. A series of 14 patients was investigated. Results: Of the 14 breast cancers under study, one with an unequivocally “very ER-rich”/“very PgR-rich” immunohistochemical phenotype totally failed to exhibit any modification in its cell proliferation level after both oestradiol and progesterone stimulation. Two cases definitively associated with an “ER-poor”/“PgR-poor” immunohistochemical phenotype nevertheless responded noticeably to the dynamic stimulation of their cell proliferation by oestradiol and progesterone. While our series of cases covers 14 patients only, it suffices to demonstrate the limits of ER and PgR determination in characterizing steroid hormone sensitivity in breast cancer. Discussion: The present work therefore presents an in vitro approach to test growth regulation of human breast cancer by steroid hormones. The clinical value of the present approach should be further determined by showing that steroid hormone-induced modifications in cell proliferation level are actually associated with clinical response.

Purpose : To characterize the influence of six factors on human thyroid tissues at the cell-proliferation level. These six factors were the epidermal growth factor (EGF), the luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), triiodothyronine, thyroxine, estradiol and gastrin. Methods : Forty-eight human thyroid specimens were obtained from surgical resection and maintained alive for 48 h ex vivo (in vitro) under organotypic culture conditions. These specimens comprised 35 benign cases (17 multinodular goiters and 18 adenomas) and 13 cancers. Cell proliferation in the control and treated conditions (at a 5 nM dose) was assessed by means of the thymidine labeling index, which enables the percentage of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle to be determined in accordance with autoradiographic procedures. Results : The results show that, of the six factors tested here, EGF significantly (P

Retinoids constitute a very promising class of agents for the chemoprevention or treatment of breast cancer. These retinoids exert their biological activity through two distinct classes of retinoic acid (RA) receptors (R), the RAR isotypes (alpha, beta, and gamma) and the three RXR isotypes (alpha, beta, and gamma) and their numerous isoforms which bind as RXR/RAR heterodimers to the polymorphic cis-acting response elements of RA target genes. With respect to these numerous receptor sub-types, the retinoid-induced effects at the biological level include marked modifications with respect to both cell proliferation and cell death (apoptosis), and also in the induction of differentiation processes. The present study aims to characterize the effect which four retinoids (TTNPB, 9-cis-RA, LGD 1069, 4-HPR) with distinct RAR/RXR binding properties induced on various in vitro and in vivo mouse and human breast cancer models. The experiments with the retinoids were carried out in comparison with the anti-estrogen tamoxifen and the anti-progestagen RU-486 compounds. The results show that the 6 compounds under study were markedly more efficient in terms of growth inhibition in the human T-47D cell line when maintained under anchorage-independent culture conditions than when maintained under anchorage-dependent ones. While RU-486 exhibited a weak statistically significant (p0.05) influence on the growth of the T-47D stem cells, tamoxifen had a marked inhibitory influence on the growth of these cells. Of the four retinoids, 4-HPR was the least effective since the lowest doses tested (1 and 0.1 nM) exhibited no statistically (p0.05) significant influence on the growth of the stem cells. The most efficient retinoid was TTNPB. It was only at the highest dose (10 microM) that tamoxifen and RU-486 showed a weak inhibitory influence on the growth of the T-47D non-stem cells while all 4 retinoids exerted a significant inhibitory influence on the growth of these non-stem cells, with 4-HPR being the most efficient (P0.001) at the highest dose, but ineffective (P0.05) at the lowest. Tamoxifen and TTNPB were tested in vivo on hormone-sensitive (HS) and hormone-insensitive (HI) strains of the MXT murine mammary carcinoma. While TTNPB appeared to be equally efficient in terms of growth inhibition in both MXT-HS and MXT-HI models, tamoxifen had only a marginal inhibitory influence on the growth of the MXT-HI strain but did inhibit growth in the case of the MXT-HS one. TTNPB was markedly more efficient than tamoxifen in terms of both inhibiting the cell proliferation level (measured by means of computer-assisted microscopy applied to Feulgen-stained nuclei, a method which enables the percentage of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle to be determined) and triggering cell death (measured by means of the determination of the transglutaminase activity) in both the MXT-HI and MXT-HS models. The very significant TTNPB-induced inhibition of the macroscopic MXT-HS growth rate relates to the triggering of cell death (apoptosis) rather than to an inhibition of cell proliferation. All these results clearly indicate that retinoids are very efficient agents against breast cancer, at least as efficient as tamoxifen.

Background: Systemic spread of disseminated tumor cells from the primary site may occur early in breast tumorigenesis. The role of HER2 in breast cancer (BC) dissemination is not well understood. We evaluated the expression of HER2 on peripheral blood Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) from women with various stages of breast cancer (BC). Methods: 81 women with preinvasive breast lesions (Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia, Lobular Carcinoma In Situ and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ), 101 women with early invasive BC and 35 women with metastatic BC were included. CTCs were defined as Cytokeratin 8,18,19+/CD45-/DAPI+ cells detected using the CellSearch® technology. Any staining for HER2 on CTCs using the CellSearch® HER2 profiling kit was considered positive. HER2 detection was calibrated through peripheral blood spiking experiments with MCF7 and SKBR3 cells. Results: > 1 CTCs/22.5mL of blood were detected in 6 of 81 (7%) women with preinvasive breast lesions (range 0-3 CTCs) and 15 of 101 (15%) women with early invasive BC (range 0-8 CTCs), whereas > 1 CTCs/7.5mL of blood were detected in 17 of 35 (49%) women with metastatic BC (range 0-1160 CTCs) (p Conclusion: This is the first report showing that HER2-positive CTCs can be detected in women with preinvasive breast lesions, further supporting the hypothesis that dissemination occurs early in breast tumorigenesis. HER2 expression on CTCs is more commonly observed in earlier stages of breast cancer, suggesting that HER2 plays an important role in early dissemination. The EORTC 90091-10093 trial will test the hypothesis that trastuzumab can eliminate HER2-positive CTCs in patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer. Note: This abstract was not presented at the AACR 101st Annual Meeting 2010 because the presenter was unable to attend. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 839.