Search

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver cancer and one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the world. Multiple immunotherapeutic approaches have been investigated to date, and immunotherapy has become the new standard of care therapy in HCC. However, the current role of immunotherapy in HCC remains non-curative. Given this context, a high priority for oncology is understanding the biomarkers that predict clinical response to immunotherapy, have the potential to improve patient selection to maximize the clinical benefit, and spare unnecessary toxicity. In this review, we summarize the key predictive and prognostic biomarkers investigated in immunotherapy clinical trials in HCC and the emerging biomarkers to serve as a roadmap for future clinical trials. Biomarkers from tumoral tissues including PDL-1 expression, tissue infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and specific immune signatures, and from peripheral blood including neutrophil-to-lymphocytes ratio, platelet-to-lymphocytes ratio, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and specific cytokines, along with gut microbiota are among the studied biomarkers to date in the HCC era. More integrative approaches, including mathematical biomarkers to predict immunotherapy outcomes, are yet to be studied in HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Fibrosis and cirrhosis are important risk factors for the development of HCC. Hepatic myofibroblasts are the cells responsible for extracellular matrix deposition, which is the hallmark of liver fibrosis. It is believed that myofibroblasts are predominantly derived from hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), also known as Ito cells. Nevertheless, depending on the nature of insult to the liver, it is thought that myofibroblasts may also originate from a variety of other cell types such as the portal fibroblasts (PFs), fibrocytes, hepatocytes, hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs), and mesothelial cells. Liver myofibroblasts are believed to transform into cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) while HCC is developing. There is substantial evidence suggesting that activated HSCs (aHSCs)/cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) may play an important role in HCC initiation and progression. In this paper, we aim to review current literature on cellular origins of myofibroblasts with a focus on hepatitis B virus (HBV)- and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced hepatic fibrosis. We also address the role of aHSCs/CAFs in HCC progression through the regulation of immune cells as well as mechanisms of evolvement of drug resistance.

BackgroundCurrently, there is no standard biomarker that predict immunotherapy response in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we aim to investigate the role of tissue stiffness measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in predicting neoadjuvant immunotherapy response in patients with resectable HCC.MethodsThis was a study of 15 patients with HCC treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy, nivolumab ± ipilimumab, followed by surgical resection. HCC MRE assessment was performed at baseline and after 6 weeks of therapy. HCC stiffness (kPa) was measured on MRE elastograms (liver stiffness maps). Baseline stiffness and changes in stiffness were compared with treatment response to ICB. Treatment response was defined as a tumor with more than 60% necrosis which was the major pathological response. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, Fisher’s exact test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test; p-value ResultsFifteen patients were evaluable for MRE assessment. The median age was 67 years. Etiology of liver disease was NASH (n=4), HCV (n=3), HBV (n=2) and unknown (n=6). Three out of 15 patients (20%) achieved a major pathological response (MPR). Median baseline HCC stiffness and change in stiffness were 4.6 kPa and –0.2 kPa, respectively. Among the 4 patients with stiffness increase, 3 (75%) of them achieved MPR and 1 (25%) did not achieve MPR. Among the patients without stiffness increase, none of them achieved MPR. Fisher’s exact test indicates that increase in stiffness was associated with a higher chance to achieve MPR than patients without stiffness increase (p=0.0088). Median baseline HCC stiffness for responders and non-responders was 6.8 (5.4, 9) kPa and 3.9 (2.2, 9.7) kPa, respectively (p=0.09). The median change in HCC stiffness for responders and non-responders was 1 (1, 1.4) kPa and -0.4 (-2.2, 0.7) kPa, respectively (p=0.02).ConclusionsPatients who achieved MPR inclined to have a higher baseline stiffness than patients who did not achieve MPR. Regarding the changes in stiffness between the two arms, patients with MPR group had a greater increase than that in the non-MPR group. In conclusion, baseline and change in MRE stiffness may be a useful biomarkers in predicting response to ICB therapy in HCC.Ethics ApprovalThis was an Institutional Review Board approved study (MDACC 2017–0972). All patients provided written informed consent.

Background Presently, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) risk stratification is estimated prior to treatment by incorporating patient and disease characteristics. However, apart from the limited use of minimal residual disease measurement, few methodologies assess AML relapse risk post-treatment. In attempts to correlate pre- and post-treatment blood cell counts with hematologic disease outcomes, the ratio, LNR, between absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and neutrophils (ANC) has been utilized to approximate the relationship between the lymphoid system and the myeloid microenvironment (in particular myeloid-derived suppressor cells), and increased LNR is prognostic in myeloma and lymphoma. Similarly, increased LMR (lymphocyte to monocyte ratio), utilized as a crude marker of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor-associated macrophages, predicts better outcomes in Hodgkin's disease (Romano et al. Ann Hematol2018). However, analyses correlating such ratios with AML outcomes have not been performed. Here we specifically investigate whether LNR, LMR, or neutrophil-monocyte (NMR) ratios, measured at multiple time-points, correlate with outcomes. Methods We identified patients >18 yrs receiving induction chemotherapy at our institution between 1/1/2005 - 12/31/2019. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]), AML subtype, cytogenetics/molecular data, ELN risk stratification, and response to therapy. We recorded patients' total WBC, ANC, ALC and AMC both prior to treatment, at first ANC recovery (ANC > 1.0 x 109/L with ALC and AMC > 0), and just prior to next therapy. We also identified a subset of patients who received consolidation chemotherapies with curative intent and collected their first WBC counts ~100 days post-therapy completion (range 50-150 days). The calculated LNR, LMR, and NMR at these time-points were correlated with Event-Free Survival (EFS), defined as time to relapse, death from any cause, or last follow-up. Data was censored on 6/1/2020. WBC ratios were categorized into tertiles. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models, survivor functions estimated using Kaplan-Meier and the equality of survivor functions tested using stratified log-rank tests. Outcomes were adjusted for CCI, age, sex, race, subtype, presence of inflammation/infection, and ELN risk. Results 145 patients met eligibility criteria, however 23 with primary refractory AML were excluded from EFS analysis. Using WBC ratios at first ANC recovery, both intermediate and high LNR trended towards a lower HR for EFS: HR 0.54 (95% CI 0.24-1.23,p= 0.142) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.32-1.33,p= 0.329), respectively, however differences were not statistically significant (Table 1 and Figure 1). A high NMR also trended towards a worse EFS: HR 1.71 (95% CI 0.74-3.99,p= 0.212), though it was also not statistically significant. LMR did not correlate with improved EFS. Notably, pre-induction ratios and the ratios measured just prior to next treatment were not associated with any differences in EFS. In a subset of patients who received curative intent consolidation chemotherapies (generally ELN favorable risk), a t-test correlating for relapse was performed, though limited by small numbers (16 without, 8 with relapse). Patients in this group who did not relapse trended toward a numerically higher LNR and LMR, 0.57 vs 0.50 (p =0.36) and 4.33 vs 3.97 (p= 0.39), respectively. Discussion In our patient population, high LNR after induction chemotherapy trended towards predicting an improved EFS. Thus, recovery WBC ratios, although crude approximations of the immune system and the tumor microenvironment, may predict patients at higher risk of relapse, however, more patients are clearly needed to show whether a statistically significant association exists. The optimal time to evaluate these counts is also not clear. Nonetheless, as blood counts are obtained routinely post-treatment, these ratios may represent a low-cost strategy to predict relapse risk, potentially allowing for earlier treatment and donor searches for allogeneic transplantation. We propose to repeat these analyses using a multi-center approach - we are especially interested in ratios measured at the 100 days post-therapy mark, as we suspect these may better reflect the immune system at steady state and, potentially, risk of relapse. Disclosures Arain: Astellas:Other: Spouse is employed.Calip:Flatiron Health:Current Employment.Khan:Takeda:Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy;Incyte:Honoraria;Amgen:Consultancy.Patel:Amgen:Consultancy;Janssen:Consultancy;Celgene:Consultancy.Quigley:Amgen:Other: Advisory board;Agios:Speakers Bureau;Alnylam:Speakers Bureau.

Background:AML is predominantly a disease of the elderly, yet outcomes remain dismal, particularly for relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients (pts). Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD33–commonly expressed on AML blasts, and, critically, AML stem cells (LSC)–linked to the cytotoxin calicheamicin. GO resistance mechanisms include (i) decreased/aberrant blast CD33 expression, (ii) p-glycoprotein export of calicheamicin, and (iii) apoptosis resistance due to deficient activation of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization, a process highly dependent on BCL-2 expression. GO-induced apoptosis depends on the pro-apoptotic proteins Bax and Bak and is inhibited by overexpression of the anti-apoptotic proteins BCL-2 or BCL-XL. Venetoclax (VEN) is a BH3 mimetic, binding BCL-2, dislodging its binding to Bak/Bax, and thus facilitating apoptosis. LSC overexpress BCL-2, however VEN monotherapy is not effective in AML, as resistance develops rapidly. Hypothesis: VEN targeting of BCL-2 proteins that protect LSC from GO-induced apoptosis will synergistically increase GO efficacy. Correlative studies include pre-treatment AML blast BH3 profiling, CD33 expression (including sequencing for isoforms), and BCL-2, BCL-XL, and MCL-1 protein levels; MRD measurement at post-therapy time points using digital drop PCR technology; and quality of life assessments (EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-Fatigue) Methods:This is a single arm, open-label, multi-center (BTCRC), dose-escalation phase Ib study of combination of VEN and GO in R/R AML pts (18-75y), using a 3+3 design. Major eligibility: ECOG 0-2, adequate organ function, CD33+ in ≥ 20% AML blasts, ≤ 3 lines of prior therapy, and no prior use of GO or VEN, previous VOD, BMT within 2 months, CNS disease, or history of HIV. Induction: 3-day VEN ramp-up to the target dose of 200 (cohort i), 400 (ii), or 600 (iii) mg daily x 28 d, with GO 3mg/m2 infused days 1, 4, and 7. If CR/CRi achieved, pts proceed to BMT if applicable, otherwise, if in CR/CRi (provided ANC > 1000, plts > 100K) or PR (regardless of counts), they are consolidated with VEN at the prescribed dose x 28d and GO 3mg/m2 on days 1 and 4 (Cycle 2). If BMT not applicable, and pt remaining in CR/CRi or PR (as above), then proceed to VEN alone as Maintenance in cycles 3+ until progression or toxicity. The primary endpoint is MTD of VEN with GO. Secondary endpoints include ORR, anti-leukemic activity, characterization of AEs, and estimates of RFS, EFS, and OS. Progress: This study is currently open to its second dosing cohort and has enrolled 5 pts to date. No dose-limiting toxicities have been encountered. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on enrollment, which is expected to improve as vaccinations expand. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04070768. Citation Format: Saad Arain, Pritesh Patel, Karen Sweiss, Brian Parkin, Heiko Konig, Gregory Calip, Betul Gok Yavuz, John Quigley. Phase Ib study of the safety and efficacy of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) and Venetoclax in patients with relapsed or refractory CD33+ acute myeloid leukemia: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-AML17-113 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT224.