Search

Background Controversy still exists regarding gender differences in virologic response between treatment-na•ve HIV-infected individuals. The objective of this study was to evaluate gender difference in virologic and immunologic response to antiretroviral therapy in treatment-na•ve HIV-infected individuals. Methods This was a retrospective, observational study of treatment-na•ve HIV-infected individuals managed at the 550 clinic who started antiretroviral therapy (ART) between January 1st, 2010 and December 31, 2015. Patients with available viral load and CD4 counts before and one year after initiating ART were included in this study. Virologic suppression was defined as < 48 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL, and mmunologic recovery was defined as a CD4 count increase of at least 150 cells/mm3. Dichotomous variables were reported in number and percentages and analyzed using Chi-squared tests and Fisher’s exact (whichever was appropriate). Continuous variables were reported as median and interquartile range (IQR) and analyzed using Wilcox rank-sum tests. Multivariate analyses performed were logistic regressions with adjustment for other covariates. P value Results A total of 70 women and 90 men were included in the study. Median age was 41 years (19) for women and 34 years (19) for men (P < 0.001). Virologic suppression was documented in 76% of women and 64% of men (p 0.166). Immune recovery was documented in 60% of women and 68% of men (p 0.323). Multivariate analysis of virologic success is shown in Figure 1 and immunologic recovery is shown in Figure 2. Conclusion In our study, gender was not found to be associated with differences in response to ART. As expected, drug abuse continues to be an independent variable associated with lack of virologic suppression. If one of the goals of treatment is to achieve a rapid immunologic response, our study may indicate that regimens containing protease inhibitors should be the ones selected. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Background Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment guidelines recommend using a regimen that contains three fully active antiretroviral agents in patients with drug resistance mutations. However, some evidence suggests that protease inhibitor (PI) based regimens containing less than three fully active drugs may be as efficacious in achieving viral suppression (VS) as a three-drug regimen in the presence of a M184V mutation. The purpose of this study was to identify current prescribing practices and determine if VS can be achieved with regimens containing less than three fully active agents in patients with a M184V mutation. Methods A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted on patients receiving treatment at the 550 Clinic from January 2003 to July 2016. Patients were screened for a M184V mutation. Patients were excluded for lack of a genotype and inadequate documentation of viral load (VL) prior to initiating or changing therapy. Regimens were characterized as containing three fully active agents or less and evaluated for VS success (VL less than 200 copies/mL). Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and Fischer’s exact tests. Results A M184V mutation was identified in 100 of the 754 patients screened for inclusion. 90% of the 167 regimens evaluated contained less than three fully active drugs. PI-based regimens (n = 86) and integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimens (n = 25) were the most commonly prescribed regimens containing less than three fully active drugs. VS was achieved with 72% of regimens containing less than three fully active agents compared with 69% of those containing three fully active agents (P = 0.108). In patients with a baseline VL greater than 100,000 copies/mL, VS was achieved with 80% of INSTI-based regimens compared with 21% of PI-based regimens (P = 0.040). VS was achieved with 85% of INSTI-based regimens and 78% of PI-based regimens in those with a baseline VL less than 100,000 copies/mL (P = 0.513). Conclusion Regimens containing less than three fully active drugs may be as efficacious as regimens containing three fully active drugs in those with a M184V mutation. In those with a high baseline VL, INSTI-based regimens may have better efficacy compared with PI-based regimens. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.