Search

Purpose To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for diffuse astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors in adults. Methods ASCO and the Society for Neuro-Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. Results Fifty-nine randomized trials focusing on therapeutic management were identified. Recommendations Adults with newly diagnosed oligodendroglioma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutant, 1p19q codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 should be offered radiation therapy (RT) and procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV). Temozolomide (TMZ) is a reasonable alternative for patients who may not tolerate PCV, but no high-level evidence supports upfront TMZ in this setting. People with newly diagnosed astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 should be offered RT with adjuvant chemotherapy (TMZ or PCV). People with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 3 should be offered RT and adjuvant TMZ. People with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, CNS WHO grade 4 may follow recommendations for either astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 3 or glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4. Concurrent TMZ and RT should be offered to patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4 followed by 6 months of adjuvant TMZ. Alternating electric field therapy, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, should be considered for these patients. Bevacizumab is not recommended. In situations in which the benefits of 6-week RT plus TMZ may not outweigh the harms, hypofractionated RT plus TMZ is reasonable. In patients age ≥ 60 to ≥ 70 years, with poor performance status or for whom toxicity or prognosis are concerns, best supportive care alone, RT alone (for MGMTpromoter unmethylated tumors), or TMZ alone (for MGMT promoter methylated tumors) are reasonable treatment options. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.

Background: H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma is a universally fatal malignancy primarily affecting children and young adults. While radiotherapy (RT) provides transient benefit, no effective systemic therapy is currently available and current standard of care is RT followed by monitoring. Dordaviprone (ONC201), a first-in-class imipridone, is an oral, blood-brain barrier penetrating, selective small molecule antagonist of dopamine receptor D2/3 (DRD2) and agonist of the mitochondrial protease ClpP. An integrated pooled analysis of five open-label trials previously demonstrated efficacy in dordaviprone-treated patients with recurrent disease. This phase 3 trial will be the first randomized, controlled study evaluating dordaviprone in patients with H3 K27M-mutant disease. Methods: ACTION (NCT05580562) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, international Phase 3 study of dordaviprone in patients with newly diagnosed H3 K27M-mutant diffuse glioma. Patients who have completed standard frontline radiotherapy will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo, once-weekly dordaviprone, or twice-weekly dordaviprone on two consecutive days. Primary efficacy endpoints are overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in all participants; PFS will be assessed by response assessment in neuro-oncology-high grade glioma by blind independent central review. Other objectives include assessments of safety, additional efficacy endpoints, clinical benefit, quality of life, pharmacokinetics, biomarkers, and healthcare resource utilization. Eligible patients will have histologically confirmed H3 K27M-mutant diffuse glioma, a Karnofsky/Lansky performance status ≥70, and completed first-line radiotherapy. Eligibility will not be restricted based on age; however, patients must be ≥10 kg at time of randomization. Patients with a primary spinal tumor, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, leptomeningeal disease, or cerebrospinal fluid dissemination are not eligible. ACTION is currently enrolling in the United States, with additional sites to be open internationally in 2023. Citation Format: Isabel Arrillaga-Romany, Andrew Lassman, Susan L. McGovern, Sabine Mueller, Louis B. Nabors, Martin van den Bent, Michael Vogelbaum, Joshua E. Allen, Allen S. Melemed, Rohinton S. Tarapore, Dewen Yang, Patrick Wen, Timothy Cloughsey. ACTION: A randomized phase 3 study of dordaviprone (ONC201) in patients with newly diagnosed H3 K27M-mutant diffuse glioma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT060.

Background: GBM AGILE (Glioblastoma Adaptive, Global, Innovative Learning Environment) is a biomarker based, multi-arm, international, seamless Phase 2/3 Response Adaptive Randomization platform trial designed to rapidly identify experimental therapies that improve overall survival and confirm efficacious experimental therapies and associated biomarker signatures to support new drug approvals and registration. GBM AGILE is a collaboration between academic investigators, patient organizations and industry to support new drug applications for newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Methods: The primary objective of GBM AGILE is to identify therapies that improve the overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent GBM. Operating under a Master Protocol, GBM AGILE allows multiple drugs from different pharmaceutical/biotech companies to be evaluated simultaneously and/or over time against a common control. New experimental therapies are added as new information about promising new drugs is identified while other therapies are removed as they complete their evaluation. Bayesian response adaptive randomization is used within subtypes of the disease to assign participants to investigational arms based on their performance. GBM AGILE has screened over 1300 patients and enrollment rates are 3 to 4 times greater than traditional GBM trials, with active sites averaging 0.75 to 1 patients/site/month. There are 41 active sites in the US, 4 active sites in Canada and 3 active sites in Europe with 12 more sites anticipated to open across 3 countries in Europe. Expansion to Australia is in progress. Stratification of the newly diagnosed patients is based on methylation status per the MGMT assay provided by a central CLIA lab. Maintaining reasonable timelines for MGMT read out to support eligibility and screening requires ongoing operational oversight. In order to continue to improve MGMT testing times, the percentage discordance between results from central testing and local lab testing is being evaluated to assess if local lab testing can be utilized for randomization within GBM AGILE. Exploratory analyses are ongoing to expand knowledge of GBM. For example, information from imaging and clinical assessments will be used to build a longitudinal model, which may inform randomization by providing earlier and continuous information regarding how a given experimental arm is performing. Citation Format: Ingo K. Mellinghoff, Brian Alexander, Donald Berry, Nicholas Blondin, Meredith Buxton, Webster Cavenee, Howard Colman, John de Groot, Macarena I. de la Fuente, Benjamin Ellingson, Gary Gordon, Emma M.V. Hyddmark, Mustafa Khasraw, Andrew Lassman, Eudocia Lee, Wenbin Li, Michael Lim, Tom Mikkelsen, Apoorva Nelli, James Perry, Erik Sulman, Kirk Tanner, Michael Weller, Patrick Y. Wen, Timothy Cloughesy. GBM AGILE: A global, phase 2/3 adaptive platform trial to evaluate multiple regimens in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT062.

Durable overall response rate (ORR) remains a meaningful endpoint in recurrent GBM; however, the target ORR for single arm recurrent GBM trials has not been based on historic information or tied to patient outcomes. The current study reviewed past trials in recurrent GBM in order to judiciously define target ORRs for use in recurrent GBM trials. After reviewing 69 treatment arms comprising 4,971 patients, ORR was 6.1%[95% CI 4.23; 8.76%] for cytotoxic chemotherapies (ORR=7.59% for CCNU, 7.57% for TMZ, 0.64% for CPT-11, and 5.32% for other agents), 3.37% for biologic agents, 7.97% for immunotherapies (select trials), and 26.8% for anti-angiogenic agents. ORRs were significantly correlated with median overall survival (mOS) across chemotherapy (R2=0.4078, P< 0.0001), biologics (R2=0.4003, P=0.0003), and immunotherapy trials (R2=0.8994, P< 0.0001), but not anti-angiogenic agents (R2=0, P=0.8937). Pooling data from chemotherapy, biologics, and immunotherapy trials, a meta-analysis indicated a strong correlation between ORR and mOS (R2=0.3164, P< 0.0001; mOS[weeks]=0.6xORR+28.9), suggesting an ORR >20% results in an mOS of > 40.9 weeks, which is double the survival estimate of a treatment with ORR=0% and ≥ 2 months longer than treatments with ORR=5%. Assuming an ineffective therapy (control) has ORR=5%, a trial of 32 patients with a target ORR=20% leads to the 95% confidence interval higher than the control group. We conclude that single arm phase II studies in recurrent GBM with ≥ 32 patients should have a target ORR ≥ 20%. This was associated with a median OS of approximately 1 year. Importantly, durability of response should also be considered and was not assessed in the current meta-analysis.

Predicting tumor sensitivity to antineoplastics remains an elusive challenge, with no methods demonstrating predictive power. Joint analysis of tumors—from patients with distinct malignancies who had progressed on multiple lines of therapy—and drug perturbation transcriptional profiles predicted sensitivity to 28 of 350 drugs, 26 of which (93%) were confirmed in low-passage, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Drugs were prioritized based on their ability to either invert the activity of individual Master Regulator proteins, with available high-affinity inhibitors, or of the modules they comprise (Tumor-Checkpoints), based on de novo mechanism of action analysis. Of 138 PDX mice enrolled in 16 single and 18 multi-protein treatment arms, a disease control rate (DCR) of 68% and 91 %, and an objective response rate (ORR) of 12% and 17%, were achieved respectively, compared to 6% and 0% in the negative controls arm, with multi-protein drugs achieving significantly more durable responses. Thus, these approaches may effectively complement and expand current precision oncology approaches, as also illustrated by a case study.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigens have been reported in over 90% of GBMs. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are most frequently directed against the gB and pp65 antigens, respectively, which are immunogenic targets in a CMV-based GBM immunotherapeutic. First-recurrent GBM patients were enrolled, with Karnofsky Performance Status of at least 70, to receive VBI-1901 (a gB/pp65 enveloped virus-like particle [eVLP]) adjuvanted with GM-CSF and given intradermally (NCT03382977). Patients were vaccinated with VBI-1901 every 4 weeks, with serologic immune-monitoring 2 weeks after each vaccination and surveillance brain MRI scans every 6 weeks. Sixteen patients (8 women, 8 men) with a median age of 55 (33-67 yrs) were enrolled into the GM-CSF arm. Seven tumor responses, including two durable partial responses, were observed which led to an 18-month OS rate of 25% and mOS of 56 weeks. Detailed immunological testing was performed to identify potential correlations at baseline and after treatment between biomarkers and tumor responses. Analyses included class I and II HLA typing, modulation of plasma cytokine and chemokine responses, boosting of CMV-specific antibody and IFN-g ELISPOT responses, and modulation of CMV-specific CD4 Tem cells, of which only differential trafficking of the CD4 Tem cells appears to distinguish patients with tumor responses from those with tumor progression. Single cell, RNAseq is underway in an attempt to understand mechanistic differences in these immune cell populations in Tumor Responders vs. Non-Responders. The U.S. FDA granted Fast Track Designation to VBI-1901 adjuvanted with GM-CSF in first-recurrent GBM patients, and an expansion of the ongoing trial with this formulation in this patient population, with the addition of randomization with a contemporaneous control arm, is anticipated to begin in Q3 2022.

BACKGROUND Dexamethasone is the primary treatment for tumor-associated edema. Prolonged use can have significant side effects and may negatively impact survival in GBM. Factors associated with steroid dependence and steroid associated side effects (SASEs) are not well established. METHODS We performed a retrospective study of patients with newly diagnosed, IDH-wildtype GBM at our center. Demographics, clinical and tumor characteristics, dexamethasone usage, and SASEs (infections, myopathy, hypertension, fractures, mood symptoms, weight gain, and hyperglycemia) were extracted through chart review. We compared survival outcomes (OS) between patients with and without steroid dependence. Risk factors for steroid dependence were identified through logistic regression analysis. RESULTS 39/92 (35.9%) patients developed steroid dependence. Of these, 26/39 (66.7%) were on steroids at the start of initial treatment. Patients who developed steroid dependence were older, more likely to have STR/biopsy, bilateral disease, KPS < 90, baseline neurological deficits, and to be obese (BMI ≥ 30). 94.9% of patients with steroid dependence experienced ≥ 1 SASE (vs. 34%) and 46.2% experienced ≥ 3 SASEs (vs. 3.8%). Mood symptoms (69.2% vs. 26.4%), hyperglycemia (53.8% vs. 7.5%) and infections (51.3% vs. 7.5%) were the most common SASEs. Median OS was inferior in steroid-dependent patients (18 vs 25 mo). Baseline obesity was identified as a risk factor for developing steroid dependence (OR 5.9). DISCUSSION SASEs are common in patients on prolonged steroids. Obesity may increase the risk of developing steroid dependence. Identifying patients at highest risk for steroid dependence may help guide future interventions to mitigate the negative effects of prolonged dexamethasone use.

BACKGROUND H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma is a universally fatal malignancy primarily affecting children and young adults; while radiotherapy (RT) provides transient benefit, no effective systemic therapy is currently available. ONC201, a first-in-class imipridone, is an oral, blood-brain barrier penetrating, selective small molecule antagonist of dopamine receptor D2/3 (DRD2) and agonist of the mitochondrial protease ClpP. An integrated pooled analysis of objective response in ONC201-treated patients enrolled in one of five open-label trials has previously demonstrated efficacy in patients with recurrent disease. This phase 3 trial will be the first randomized, controlled study evaluating ONC201 in patients with H3 K27M-mutant disease. METHODS ONC108 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, international Phase 3 study of ONC201 in patients with newly diagnosed H3 K27M-mutant diffuse glioma. Patients will be randomized to receive once-weekly ONC201 or placebo following standard frontline radiotherapy. Primary efficacy endpoints are overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in all participants; PFS will be assessed with the response assessment in neuro-oncology-high grade glioma by blind independent central review. Other objectives include assessments of safety, additional efficacy endpoints, clinical benefit, quality of life, pharmacokinetics, biomarkers, and healthcare resource utilization. Eligible patients will have histologically confirmed H3 K27M-mutant diffuse glioma, a Karnofsky/Lanksy performance status ≥ 70, and completed first-line radiotherapy. Eligibility will not be restricted based on age; however, patients must be ≥ 10 kg at time of randomization. Patients with a primary spinal tumor, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, leptomeningeal disease, or cerebrospinal fluid dissemination are not eligible.

INTRODUCTION Time to recurrence is a source of considerable anxiety in glioblastoma. Assuming survival to a certain timepoint without tumor progression, how do odds/outcomes change relative to initial starting conditions? Is there a single timepoint with highest risk of tumor progression, after which "the longer you go, the longer you go"? METHODS Newly-diagnosed glioblastomas were retrospectively reviewed (n=209). Pre-2012 diagnoses (n=2) & IDH-mutants excluded (n=8). Median PFS/OS and remaining time to mPFS were calculated for sub-populations without disease progression (POD) at 0, 3, 6, 8, 12, and 24 months post-surgery. RESULTS 199 IDH-wildtype glioblastomas identified -- 40% women, median age 63 years (range 26-91), 43% gross-total resection, 65% MGMT unmethylated, 65% upfront RT 60Gy (23% 40Gy) -- mPFS 8 months / mOS 19 months. Patients without POD within 3 months had mOS 20 months. Outcomes progressively improve at later timepoints-- mPFS 10/13/20/39 months and mOS 23/27/39/65 months, for patients without POD at 6/8/12/24 months post-surgery respectively. Patients without POD at 24 months comprised 10% of original cohort (n=20; 8 deaths). As a surrogate for risk of tumor progression, remaining time to mPFS was calculated (taken as difference between timepoint in question, and mPFS for the population of patients without POD up to that timepoint) and followed a J-shape curve -- 8 months (at 0 months post-surgery), 4 months (for patients without POD at 6 months post-surgery), 7-8 months (for patients without POD at 10-14 months post-surgery), to 13 and 15 months (for patients without POD at 18 and 24 months post-surgery, respectively). DISCUSSION Sub-populations without early progression appear to have improved survival relative to baseline, which has implications for clinical trials without internal controls. Nevertheless, highest risk for tumor progression seems to be at 6 months post-surgery, after which it appears "the longer you go, the longer you go."

BACKGROUND EGFR is amplified in over 50% of glioblastoma and 20-30% have EGFRvIII mutations. Neratinib is a potent inhibitor of EGFR/HER2 approved for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. To efficiently evaluate the potential impact of neratinib on overall survival (OS) in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and to simultaneously develop information regarding potential genomic biomarker associations, neratinib was included as an arm on the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial. INSIGhT is a phase II platform trial using response adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma and accelerate identification of novel therapies for phase III testing. Initial randomization was equal between neratinib, control, and two other experimental arms but subsequent randomization was adapted based on efficacy as determined by progression-free survival (PFS). We report preliminary results for the neratinib arm. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma were randomized to receive either radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide or standard radiochemotherapy followed by adjuvant neratinib (240 mg daily). Treatment continued until progression or development of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was OS. Association between neratinib efficacy and EGFR amplification was also investigated. RESULTS There were 144 patients (70 control; 74 neratinib). Neratinib was reasonably well-tolerated with no new toxicity signals identified. PFS was compared (HR 0.84; p=0.38, logrank test – not significant) between the neratinib (median 6.05 months) and control (median 5.82 months) arms. For patients EGFR pathway activation the PFS HR was 0.53 (p-value=0.03 – significant, median PFS: neratinib, 6.21 months, control, 5.26 months). However, there was no significant improvement in OS in EGFR amplified/mutated patients (HR 1.05; p-value 0.87) between neratinib (median 14.2) compared to the control arm (median 14.6). CONCLUSION Neratinib prolonged PFS in the EGFR positive subpopulation but there was no overall PFS benefit, or any OS improvement.

BACKGROUND H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma is an invariably lethal form of brain cancer that disproportionately affects children and young adults and has no effective treatment following front-line radiation. The initial disease definition in the 2016 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System regarded the H3 K27M mutation as pathognomonic, though the definition was updated in 2018 restricting the diagnosis to histologically diffuse gliomas that involve midline CNS structures (cIMPACT-NOW update 2). ONC201 is an investigational anti- cancer small molecule, DRD2 antagonist and ClpP agonist that has induced durable tumor regressions by RANO-HGG criteria in a registration cohort of recurrent diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant patients treated with single agent ONC201. METHODS We present 7 patients with H3 K27M-mutant diffuse gliomas were enrolled in ONC201 clinical studies, excluded from the registration cohort due to involvement of non-midline CNS structures, all within the cerebral hemispheres (3 frontal, 1 temporal, 1 frontotemporal, 1 parietal, and 1 corona radiata). RESULTS Two of the 7 patients underwent objective responses by RANO-HGG criteria as assessed by investigator, which was associated with clinical benefit that included increased mobility and level of alertness. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate that H3 K27M-mutant diffuse gliomas occur outside of midline CNS structures, and suggest that ONC201 has single agent activity in H3 K27M-mutant gliomas irrespective of CNS location.