Search

EO9 is a synthetic indoloquinone which was designed to undergo redox cycling and formation of alkylating intermediates under bioreductive conditions. As part of a phase I clinical trial, EO9 plasma disposition was evaluated in 20 patients receiving 2.7-15 mg/m2i.v. weekly for 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with the first and third dose of therapy and nine blood samples were obtained over 30 min postinfusion. Plasma EO9 was detected using HPLC UV and the disposition described by a two-compartment model. Wide variability in EO9 pharmacokinetics was observed. EO9 was rapidly eliminated from plasma with a median systemic clearance of 3.5 l/min/m2 (range 1.2-9.8), apparent volume of distribution of 6.2 l/m2 (1.0-34.9) and t 1/2 beta of 10.1 min (2.2-63.0). Substantial intrapatient variability was observed for all pharmacokinetic parameters. Linear regression and Bayesian methods were developed and validated for estimation of EO9 plasma AUC using up to three samples postinfusion. The use of two or three plasma samples provided precise estimation with acceptable prediction bias. In addition, a Bayesian algorithm offered more robust estimation of AUC and is preferable to linear regression models for future EO9 population pharmacokinetic analysis.

Rhizoxin is a macrocyclic lactone compound that binds to tubulin and inhibits microtubule assembly. Rhizoxin demonstrated preclinical anti-tumour activity against a variety of human tumour cell lines and xenograft models. Phase I evaluation found a maximum tolerated rhizoxin dose of 2.6 mg m-2, with reversible, but dose-limiting, mucositis, leucopenia and diarrhoea. Clinical trials were then initiated by the EORTC ECSG in melanoma, breast, head and neck, and non-small-cell lung cancers with the recommended phase II rhizoxin dose of 2 mg m-2. Pharmacological studies were instituted with the phase II trials to complement the limited pharmacokinetic data available from the phase I trial. Blood samples were obtained from 69 of 103 eligible patients enrolled in phase II rhizoxin studies, and these were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis in 36 patients. Plasma rhizoxin concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and post-distribution pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by a one-compartment model. Rhizoxin was rapidly eliminated from plasma, with a median systemic clearance of 8.41 min-1 m-2 and an elimination half-life of 10.4 min. Rhizoxin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was higher in patients obtaining a partial response or stable disease than in those with progressive disease (median 314 vs 222 ng ml-1 min; P = 0.03). As predicted from previous studies, haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity was observed, but could not be shown to be related to rhizoxin AUC. This study demonstrated the rapid and variable elimination of rhizoxin from the systemic circulation. The presence of pharmacodynamic relationships and the low level of systemic toxicity suggest that future trials of rhizoxin with alternative dosage or treatment schedules are warranted.

LL-D49194α1 is a new cytotoxic antibiotic selected for clinical phase I study because of its impressive pre-clinical anti-tumour activity and its low toxicity profile in experimental animals. A total of 15 patients were treated in centres in Glasgow and Amsterdam at doses ranging from 0.25 to 4 mg/m2. One minor response was noted in a patient with colonic carcinoma. The study was suspended following the discovery of unexpected cardiotoxicity. As this toxicity was not consistent with the standard (EORTC) European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicology profile, we chose to investigate the pharmacokinetics of LL-D49194α1 in mice and humans in more detail to try to explain this phenomenon. A major difference in plasma protein binding was discovered between mice and patients, with a suggestion of non-linear kinetics being noted at higher doses in humans. It is likely that these differences in drug handling account for the unexpected and serious toxicity encountered in this trial.

Background Rhizoxin is a new macrocyclic lactone isolated from the fungus Rhizopus chinensis which displays broad-spectrum antitumor activity against murine and human tumor xenografts and has activity against a number of vincristine-resistant tumors in vitro and in vivo. Purpose This study describes the preclinical and clinical pharmacology of rhizoxin to apply a pharmacokinetically guided dose-escalation (PGDE) strategy during the phase I trial. Methods Rhizoxin was administered by a single intravenous bolus injection to female BALB/c mice over the dose range 7.5-18 mg/m2 from which we derived the dose that was lethal to 10% and 50% of the mice (i.e., LD10 and LD50, respectively). The LD10 was 11.7 +/- 0.7 mg/m2 (mean +/- SD), and the LD50 was 14.7 +/- 0.6 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic studies were integrated with the toxicity study in female BALB/c mice at one-tenth the LD10, one-half the LD10, and the LD10 (i.e., 1.2, 6, and 12 mg/m2, respectively). From these data, a target area under the plasma drug concentration versus time curve (AUC) (i.e., 40% of the LD10 AUC) was calculated for clinical studies. Phase I studies were initiated at 0.8 mg/m2 (one-tenth the equivalent LD10 in male CD1 mice), with the intent of escalating the dose by an extended factor-of-two method until the target AUC and/or maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached. Results The major drug toxic effects in mice were body weight loss, sluggishness, ataxia, transient changes in hematological parameters, and hematuria. Diarrhea was universal at doses greater than 9 mg/m2, and hind limb paralysis was observed in one of 10 mice, but only at supralethal doses (18 mg/m2). Rhizoxin pharmacokinetics were best described by a two-compartment open model (half-life [t 1/2] alpha = 4.4 minutes +/- 0.9 minute [mean +/- SD], and t 1/2 beta = 84 minutes +/- 20 minutes at 12 mg/m2) and found to be nonlinear with respect to dose. At doses of 1.2, 6, and 12 mg/m2, the respective AUC values were 1.3, 22.4, and 70.6 microM x minute. From these data, a target AUC value of 28 microM x minute (40% of the LD10 AUC) was derived. Rhizoxin was not detectable in patient plasma (less than 5 ng/mL at 0.8 and 1.6 mg/m2), and doses had to be escalated by conventional methods. Myelosuppression was dose limiting in patients: Seven of eight treated at 2.6 mg/m2 experienced World Health Organization grade 3-4 neutropenia, and five of eight developed mucositis. The AUC values at the human MTD (2.6 mg/m2) were in the range of 0.41-1.01 microM x minute, considerably lower than the target AUC of 28 microM x minute. Conclusion and implications Although PGDE schemes have been successfully employed for other antitumor agents, this methodology could not be applied during the phase I trial of rhizoxin. PGDE studies in the future may incorporate comparative murine versus human metabolism studies in vitro with phenotyped liver microsomes. It may also be useful to assess the comparative myelotoxicity of a new drug by performing in vitro cytotoxicity studies on mouse and human bone marrow stem cells.

Purpose The DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (decitabine) induces DNA demethylation and re-expression of epigenetically silenced genes, and increases carboplatin sensitivity of tumor xenograft models. We designed a clinical study to determine the feasibility of delivering a dose of decitabine, combined with carboplatin, that would be capable of producing equivalent biologic effects in patients with solid tumors. Patients and Methods In a two-stage design, 33 patients received escalating doses of decitabine administered as a 6-hour infusion on day 1 followed by carboplatin, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 5 (cohort 1) and AUC 6 (cohort 2), on day 8 of a 28-day cycle. Pharmacodynamic analyses included 5-methyl-2′-deoxycytidine levels, MAGE1A CpG island methylation, and fetal hemoglobin (HbF) expression. Results The major toxicity was myelosuppression. Dose limiting toxicities, prolonged grade 4 neutropenia (one patient), and sepsis and grade 3 anorexia/fatigue (one patient), were seen in two of four patients treated with decitabine 135 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 5. Dose limiting toxicity comprising neutropenic sepsis (one patient) and grade 3 fatigue (one patient) was seen in two of 10 patients treated at decitabine 90 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6. Decitabine induced dose-dependent, reversible demethylation in peripheral-blood cells (PBCs) maximally at day 10. Furthermore, decitabine 90 mg/m2 induced demethylation of the MAGE1A CpG island in PBCs, buccal cells, and tumor biopsies, as well as elevation of HbF expression. Conclusion Decitabine can be combined safely with carboplatin at a dose and schedule that causes epigenetic changes equivalent to or greater than that observed in mice with carboplatin-sensitized xenografts. The recommended dose/schedule for phase II trials is decitabine 90 mg/m2 (day 1) followed by carboplatin AUC 6 (day 8) every 28 days.

Recent clinical trials have suggested that a combination of folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may improve response rates and survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. However, this regimen has been complicated by potentially life threatening toxicity. Regional delivery of folinic acid via a hepatic artery catheter might be expected to reduce systemic exposure and subsequent adverse effects. The present study compared the pharmacokinetic profiles of intravenous and intra-hepatic arterial infusions of folinic acid in patients with colorectal liver metastases (n = 6) who were being treated with weekly regional infusions of 5-FU. The mean area under the plasma concentration--time curve, the peak plasma concentration and the steady state volume of distribution were 163 micrograms ml-1 h-1 (SD 41), 18.5 micrograms ml-1 (SD 1.2) and 7.41 m-2 (SD 0.44) respectively following intravenous administration of folinic acid compared with 142 micrograms ml-1 h-1 (SD 45), 14.8 micrograms ml-1 (SD 2.4) and 11.21 m-2 (SD 1.22) following intra-hepatic arterial administration (P less than 0.05). Regional folinic acid was therefore associated with a statistically significant reduction in systemic exposure compared with the intravenous route.

Twenty-six patients with advanced malignancies received TGU given as an intravenous (i.v.) bolus in physiological saline at 3 weekly intervals. The starting dose was 30 mg/m 2 with standard graded escalations to 900 mg/m 2 . Myelosuppression occurred at 800 mg/m 2 , with a mean nadir of 2.0 ± 0.8 × 10 9 / l and a mean nadir platelet count of 41 ± 31 × 10 9 / l . At 800 or 900 mg/m 2 nausea and vomiting was WHO grade 0 in 5, grade I in 6, grade II in 11 and grade III in 10 courses of therapy. Alopecia did not occur. TGU was given by i.v. infusion at 800 mg/m 2 in 2 patients, both of whom developed severe thrombophlebitis. Five patients given TGU by i.v. bolus developed mild phlebitis. No renal, hepatic or cardiac toxicity was noted. Two patients had partial responses; both had adenocarcinoma of unknown primary origin, one of whom had been resistant to prior therapy with FAM. An HPLC analytical method was developed with a sensitivity of 250 ng/ml . The data from 7 patients studied best fit a one compartment pharmacokinetic model with an exponential decay and a t12 of only 2.1 min. In conclusion, the dose limiting toxicity of TGU appears to be myelosuppression and we would recommend a dose of 800 mg/m 2 given as an intravenous bolus every 4 weeks for future phase II trials.

LY 195448 is a phenethanolamine that has shown anti-tumour activity in a range of murine tumour models, although its mechanism of action is unknown. Pre-clinical studies have indicated the absence of “standard” side effects such as myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. The present phase I trial was carried out in nine patients at doses ranging up to 133 mg/m2. The major toxicities up to that dose were mild, reversible hypotension, tachycardia and tremor. No haematological or biochemical toxicity was observed. Murine pharmacokinetics were assessed at a dose level that was effective in experimental tumours and compared with human pharmacokinetic parameters derived from this study. The results indicated the clinical possibility of reaching peak drug levels associated with experimental activity. However, no responses were seen at the doses used. This study was terminated prior to its completion due to an unexplained loss of activity against murine tumours since September 1987. No significant loss of the in vitro anti-mitotic activity originally reported by Boder et al. [3] was observed. Possible reasons for the apparent loss of in vivo activity have been intensively investigated, but no cause has been determined. Therefore, clinical trials with LY 195448 have been discontinued.

We investigated the differences in plasma protein binding of flavone acetic acid (FAA) in mice and men in an attempt to explain the inter-species differences in response. In vitro data indicate both qualitative and quantitative differences in FAA protein binding: approximately 80% is bound in humans, with two different types of binding site identified; in mice, 70% is bound and only one binding site could be described. Protein binding is dose-dependent in both species. Plasma samples from 20 patients receiving FAA showed that most achieved levels that would be active in mice. We conclude that these differences in protein binding are insufficient to explain totally the observed differences in response.

This article details a procedure for the analysis of TGU by a simple high-pressure liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method. Linearity is maintained over the range from zero to at least 30 micrograms 1,2,4, triglycidyl urazol (TGU). The sensitivity of the assay is 250 ng/ml. A second peak, as yet unidentified, was detected on the chromatogram and probably represents a metabolite of TGU. The pharmacokinetic profile of TGU in Porton mice shows a first-order elimination process with a half-life (t1/2 alpha) of 1.5 min for the distribution phase and a t1/2 beta of 5 min. The apparent volume of distribution is 0.75 ml and the clearance 0.10 ml/min with a elimination rate constant of 0.14 min.