Search

The outer hair cells of the organ of Corti are the target of abundant efferent projections from the olivocochlear system. This peripheral efferent auditory subsystem is currently thought to be modulated by central activity via corticofugal descending auditory system, and to modulate active cochlear micromechanics. Although the function of this efferent subsystem remains unclear, physiological, psychophysical, and modeling data suggest that it may be involved in ear protection against noise damage and auditory perception, especially in the presence of background noise. Moreover, there is mounting evidence that its activity is modulated by auditory and visual attention. A commonly used approach to measure olivocochlear activity noninvasively in humans relies on the suppression of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise. Previous studies have found substantial interindividual variability in this effect, and statistical differences have been observed between professional musicians and non-musicians, with stronger bilateral suppression effects in the former. In this paper, we review these studies and discuss various possible interpretations for these findings, including experience-dependent neuroplasticity. We ask whether differences in olivocochlear function between musicians and non-musicians reflect differences in peripheral auditory function or in more central factors, such as top-down attentional modulation., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Active cochlear micromechanisms, involved in auditory sensitivity, are modulated by the medial olivocochlear efferent system, which projects directly onto the organ of Corti. Both processes can be assessed non-invasively by means of evoked otoacoustic emissions. Animal experiments have revealed top-down control from the auditory cortex to peripheral auditory receptor, supported by anatomical descriptions of descending auditory pathways from auditory areas to the medial olivocochlear efferent system and organ of Corti. Through recording of evoked otoacoustic emissions during presurgical functional brain mapping for refractory epilepsy, we showed that corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory activity also exists in humans. In 10 epileptic patients, electrical stimulation of the contralateral auditory cortex led to a significant decrease in evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude, whereas no change occurred under stimulation of non-auditory contralateral areas. These findings provide evidence of a cortico-olivocochlear pathway, originating in the auditory cortex and modulating contralateral active cochlear micromechanisms via the medial olivocochlear efferent system, in humans.

Benzodiazepines (Bzd) are known to interact with GABAergic inhibitory neurotransmission. Previous research on their effect on human auditory efferent pathways--through evoked otoacoustic emissions suppression by contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS)--indicated a decrease in medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent system inhibitory activity, after oral intake of oxazepam--representative of the Bzd drug class. To date, this pharmacological effect was only assessed in the right ear. Since a leftward asymmetry of Bzd receptors localization in human auditory cortex has been described recently, we explored in this study the hypothesis of an asymmetrical action of Bzd on MOC efferent functioning. The results revealed a significant difference of Bzd effect probing the right ear versus the left ear, with CAS-induced suppression being less effective in the right than left ear after oxazepam intake. This finding raises the question of possible neurochemical left-right asymmetry in the descending auditory pathways. The potential localization of this asymmetry is discussed.

This study was conducted to investigate maturation of the medial olivocochlear efferent system (MOCS) in pre- and full-term neonates using Quickscreen (Otodynamics Ltd) and to confirm previous findings on transient otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) suppression in neonates. MOCS maturation was investigated in 46 neonates born at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel, using Quickscreen. All neonates were normal with no family history of general or auditory disease and no risk factors for hearing impairment. MOCS function appears gradually in human pre-term neonates and is considered to reach maturity shortly after term birth. The clinical value of MOCS testing in specific populations of newborns at risk for hearing and/or brainstem function can be legitimately raised as activation of the MOCS clearly alters cochlear output. The present results can be interpreted to support the testing of infants at risk of developing abnormal MOCS function using a commercially available rapid TEOAE measurement system.

In order to test the hypothesis of a role of cochlear efferent activity in intensity perception in humans, loudness functions, loudness integration, and loudness summation were measured in the absence and in the presence of contralateral noise in normal-hearing subjects. Additionally, relationships with the effect of the noise on evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) were tested, and comparisons with vestibular neurotomy patients were performed. Overall, the results failed to demonstrate significant effects of contralateral noise stimulation on loudness functions and loudness integration. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in vestibular neurotomy patients. A significant effect of contralateral noise on loudness summation was noted, but was not related to the effect on otoacoustic emissions. The present results fail to support the notion that efferent influences onto the cochlear compression have a significant perceptual effect.

It is well known that the large inter-individual susceptibility to noise exposure makes it impossible to predict the degree of hearing loss which will develop after any given intense noise exposure. The acoustic trauma which sometimes occurs affects cochlear mechanisms, the damage being most probably due to deactivation of the active processes of the outer hair cells (OHCs), which receive direct efferent innervation. The present report is of a follow-up study involving young military personnel recovering auditively from impulse noise exposure, and seeks to assess changes in cochlear status by means of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) and their modulation by the medial olivocochlear (MOC) system. The study investigated the relationship between recovery of cochlear function and variables that could serve as predictors of vulnerability to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). Thirty-six subjects with unilateral NHIL above 4 kHz were included. Normal and affected ears were compared with respect to click-evoked and spontaneous OAEs (CEOAEs and SOAEs, respectively) and for contralateral CEOAE suppression. Measurements were obtained: (i) just after the traumatic exposure (D0); (ii) 3 days after this first measurement (D3); and (iii) 30 days after (D30). Significant improvement in the 4, 6 and 8 kHz thresholds was observed for the affected ear, with large inter-subject variability. No significant change was observed in CEOAE amplitude or MOC suppression, whereas incidence of SOAE was found to increase in the affected ear, leading to higher SOAE prevalence on this side I month after the intense noise exposure. There was no significant correlation between NIHL at 4, 6 and 8 kHz and MOC functioning on D0, but significant correlations were obtained between audiometric threshold improvement by D3 and contralateral CEOAE suppression, with better recovery in subjects with greater MOC suppressive action. The MOC system could be an underlying mechanism in post-traumatic auditory threshold recovery.

The activity of the medial olivocochlear bundle (MOCB) can be studied in humans through variations in the level of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) elicited by contralateral acoustic stimuli (CAS). The present study sought to investigate how the activity of the MOC system at a given frequency, as measured through the contralateral suppression of tone-pip EOAEs, depends on the bandwidth of the contralateral stimulus. EOAEs were recorded in 155 normal-hearing subjects, successively with and without contralateral stimuli whose bandwidth, center frequency and level were systematically varied. We showed a clear dependence of contralateral EOAE suppression on bandwidth demonstrating increased suppression with increased bandwidth over about two octaves around the center frequency of the noise. This effect was obtained irrespective of whether contralateral noise energy was kept constant independently of bandwidth or not, which indicates a role of bandwidth per se in contralateral EOAE suppression. Results are interpreted in terms of a simple model of MOCB activation mechanisms including peripheral bandpass filtering, within-channel compression and across-channel spatial summation by the afferent paths. Complementary experiments suggested a greater effectiveness of increases in bandwidth on the upper than on the lower side and of frequency components akin to or remote from the test frequency than of intermediate bands. Finally, these results were complemented by detailed spectrum analyses of the EOAE level variations induced by the different noises, which revealed that whilst noise components close to or remote from the center frequency generally attenuated EOAE level, intermediate components could in some cases lead to a relative increase in EOAE level. These results can further be explained by assuming different positive and negative weights on the inputs to the spatial summation process depending on their position relative to the center frequency.

The auditory sensory end organ is under the control of the central nervous system via efferent projections. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions (acoustic signatures of the cochlear biomechanical activity) provides a non-invasive approach to assess olivocochlear efferent activity in humans. Using this approach, the present study compared professional musicians with musically-inexperienced subjects. The results revealed stronger bilateral cochlear suppression, suggesting larger efferent influences in both ears, in musicians. Furthermore, in indicating no difference in left/right asymmetry of efferent-mediated suppression between the two groups, the present findings suggest that the observed differences in olivocochlear activity reflect bilaterally-enhanced activity of the cortical auditory structures in musicians rather than differences in cerebral hemispheric asymmetry between the two groups.

The mammalian cochlea receives innervation from the central nervous system via two efferent systems: the lateral and the medial olivocochlear bundles. Advances in cochlear physiology have clarified the origins and terminations of these fibers. However, to date, while the functional significance of lateral efferents remains totally unknown, that of medial efferents is still controversial. The peripheral effects of medial olivocochlear system activation have been described, but the role of this inhibitory feedback onto the cochlea is still unclear. This overview summarizes the main results of several psychophysiological studies performed in humans dealing with the functional significance of medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing.

In a previous study, a peripheral auditory asymmetry in right-handers was found. The activity of the uncrossed medial olivocochlear efferent pathway has been shown to be more effective in the right than in the left ear. Our aim was to compare right and left medial olivocochlear inhibition during contralateral, ipsilateral and binaural ear stimulation with a broad band noise, in order to better localize this asymmetry. Uncrossed pathway asymmetry was confirmed and the crossed pathway showed a reverse asymmetry: a left ear advantage. These results are in accordance with the assumption that the medial superior olivary complex is the locus of the asymmetry observed. As this nuclear complex receives central efferents, the peripheral auditory asymmetry may be related to the well-known cortical asymmetry.

Previous studies indicate a left-right asymmetry in the function of peripheral auditory system. Contralateral acoustic suppression of TEOAEs (transient evoked otoacoustic emissions) enables assessment of medial olivocochlear efferent system functioning, and has demonstrated that this system is more effective in the right than in the left ear. Moreover, TEOAE amplitudes are lower in the left than in the right ear. The aim of the present experiment was to verify firstly the absence of a relationship between medial efferent system asymmetry and TEOAE amplitude asymmetry, and secondly to study TEOAE input/output function slopes. There was no link between the asymmetries in TEOAE amplitude and in the medial efferent system functioning. Further, as previously shown, the medial olivocochlear system increased the TEOAE input/output function slopes. These TEOAE input/output function slopes seem to be consistent factors in peripheral asymmetry since the slope is lower in the right than in the left ear. Moreover, the lower the TEOAE amplitudes, the greater the TEOAE slopes. The slope asymmetry of the two ears could correspond to earlier saturation or a lower augmentation ability of the TEOAE response in the right ear, where the TEOAE amplitude is higher. This asymmetry in growth slopes reinforces the notion of peripheral auditory lateralization.

By using otoacoustic emission, we looked for change in outer hair cell (OHC) motile activity and medial olivocochlear (MOC) system inhibition due to benzodiazepine administration, a drug that is known to produce a pharmacological effect by interacting with GABAergic inhibitory neurotransmission. No effect was observed on OHC motile activity, in contrast benzodiazepines decreased MOC system effectiveness suggesting the existence of GABAergic fibers projecting onto the MOC system.

Neuropsychological studies have demonstrated that language perception is lateralized at the hemispheric level. There is also much evidence for a peripheral lateralization of the auditory system in humans. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are more frequent in the right than in the left ear. The medial olivo-cochlear system is also more functional in the right than in the left ear in normal subjects. The study of specific samples shows that this asymmetry is found in professional musicians which have more functional efferent system in both ears. A link is hypothesized between peripheral and central laterality because of a dysfunctional peripheral asymmetry in pathological cases which show hemispheric lateralization disorders. Consequences of those pathological data will be discussed.

To investigate the involvement of the medial olivocochlear system (MOCS) in outer hair cell (OHC) motility stabilization, evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) were recorded in 20 normal-hearing subjects and in eight vestibular-neurotomized subjects, successively in the presence and absence of low-intensity contralateral acoustic stimulation. Intrasubject EOAE amplitude variability was assessed as the standard deviation computed over several successive recordings. In normal-hearing subjects, a significantly lower EOAE amplitude variability with contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) was observed in subjects in whom the CAS induced the greatest EOAE amplitude reduction. This result could not be attributed to the EOAE amplitude reduction itself, since variability was otherwise found to increase when EOAE amplitude decreased. Moreover, statistically significant correlations between EOAE amplitude attenuation and EOAE amplitude variability under CAS were observed. In the eight subjects operated for vestibular neurotomy, no such effect was found. Being sectioned in vestibular-neurotomized subjects, the MOCS can no longer exert its effects. These results strongly support the notion that MOCS activity, as induced by CAS, elicits a reduction in EOAE amplitude variability in normal-hearing subjects. This finding and some of its possible implications for understanding the role of the MOCS in hearing in humans are discussed.

To test the hypothesis of temporal modifications of cochlear responses when medial efferents are activated, otoacoustic emission latencies were estimated in 16 normal human subjects, in the presence and absence of a contralateral broadband noise, using measurements of the phase of the 2f1-f2 distortion product (group latency method). Significant decrease in the latency of lower frequency (0.8-2.7 kHz) emissions was found in the presence of increasing levels of contralateral sound, and this effect disappeared when the primary-tone levels increased to 60 dB SPL. To ensure that effects were not attributable to mechanisms involving middle ear structures, susceptible to activation by contralateral sound, latency measures were performed in seven subjects whose efferents were severed during a vestibular neurotomy and in two subjects with paralyzed stapedial muscle. Results in patients were compared to those obtained in three surgical control patients with intact efferent bundle, and in eight other normal subjects. All the subject groups exhibited a decrease in latency under contralateral sound except the patients with the severed efferent system who showed increased latencies.

Recent physiological data in animals suggest a role of the medial olivocochlear system (MOCS) in auditory intensity discrimination in noise. In this study, the existence of statistical relationships between intensity difference limens (IDLs) and MOCS functioning was tested in humans. IDLs were measured in conditions of quiet and of ipsilateral, contralateral, and dichotic noise. MOCS functioning was assessed through the contralateral evoked otoacoustic emission (EOAE) amplitude attenuation effect. A first finding was that IDLs measured in the presence of ipsilateral noise were reduced when contralateral noise was added. Furthermore, the observed shift in IDL appeared to be significantly correlated to the contralateral EOAE amplitude attenuation effect. These results support the hypothesis that MOCS functioning plays a role in intensity discrimination in dichotic noise in humans.

The influence of variable durations of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the suppression of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions was investigated in order to determine whether olivocochlear efferent fibers are equally effective whatever the acoustical stimulation duration or if they show fatigue. The suppression effect was measured for contralateral stimulus durations ranging from 10 to 180 s prior to the onset of otoacoustic emission recording, and continuing throughout the recording time (60 s). No significant stimulus duration effect was found.

Evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) are assumed to be generated by outer hair cells (OHCs). It is now generally accepted that EOAEs represent a means of functional exploration of the active micromechanical properties of OHCs. Efferent fibers of the medial olivocochlear system (MOCS) are connected along the sides and the bases of OHCs. Some studies have shown that a suppression effect on EOAE amplitude is induced by the MOCS neurons during contralateral stimulation, presumably by modification of OHC motility. The contralateral acoustic stimuli used in experiments on the EOAE suppression effect have consisted mainly of sounds without a slow temporal fluctuation in their envelopes (broad-band noise, narrow-band noise, pure tones, or clicks). To elucidate further the parameters of MOCS activation, in the present study we looked at the contralateral suppression effect of amplitude-modulated (AM) tones. The results showed that EOAE amplitude was reduced with AM tones compared with no contralateral acoustic stimulation. The suppression effect mainly depended on three parameters. 1) Contralateral stimulation intensity: EOAE suppression occurred only with intensities > or = 40 dB SL. 2) The greater the modulation depth, the greater the suppression effect: statistical analysis showed a significant effect for 75 and 100% modulation depth. 3) The 100- and 140-Hz modulation frequencies gave the greatest suppression effect for 100 and 75% modulation depths. The suppression effect was frequency specific. The greatest decreases were observed when the carrier frequency of the contralateral AM tone was close to the frequency of the EOAE under study, i.e., 1 and 2 kHz. Acoustic cross talk and middle ear effects, which cannot be completely excluded, are discussed. However, the demonstrated frequency specificity of the EOAE suppression effect, together with observed presence of contralateral EOAE suppression in patients without stapedial reflex and the very weak intensities used (i.e., below acoustic reflex threshold), suggested that it was unlikely that the observed effects were due merely to middle ear reflexes. Our results confirm further the contralateral suppression effect on human cochlea mechanisms and show that the suppression effect can be influenced by amplitude modulations of the suppressor, characteristic of sounds in the environment.

The present study aimed to confirm and extend the finding, suggested by the results of a previous study, of different auditory neural efferent functioning in musicians compared with non-musicians. The activity of the medial olivocochlear bundle (MOCB), an auditory efferent subsystem, was measured through the contralaterally induced attenuation of the amplitude of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) in two groups, one of musicians and one of non-musicians, paired for age and sex. The results indicated a statistically significant difference between the two groups, with the musicians showing greater amplitude reduction upon contralateral noise stimulation than non-musicians (U-test, U = 204, p < 0.025, n = 32). These results indicate greater MOCB activity in musicians than in non-musicians. The possible origins and implications of this finding are discussed.

In 28 normal-hearing human subjects, the medial olivocochlear efferent system was activated by contralateral acoustic stimulation which is able to mimic the inhibitory effects of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. A first experiment on 16 subjects demonstrated that a contralateral white noise of 35 dB SL was able to induce temporal changes on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in response to clicks of 63 dB SPL. These temporal changes consisted of an advance of click-evoked otoacoustic signals in 87% of cases and is referred to as phase-shift effect. The phase advance, quantified using two signal processing methods in both time and frequency domains, was found to be mainly associated with lower frequencies, with a maximal effect at 1.5 kHz and minimal effects around 3.5 and 4 kHz. In a second experiment, carried out on 12 subjects, a negative relationship was found to exist between the ipsilateral stimulation level (level of clicks ranging from 57 to 69 dB SPL) and the phase-shift effect (PSE). Specifically in the range of levels tested (25-45 dB SL), a linear relationship presenting no obvious saturation effect was observed between the contralateral level and the PSE. The PSE was examined in 6 additional subjects exhibiting pathological symptoms; 2 of 3 individuals, who had no contralateral stapedial reflexes unilaterally, showed the PSE whereas this response was reduced or absent in 3 other subjects in the ear with severed efferents associated with a vestibular neurotomy. The integrity of olivocochlear efferents was, therefore, necessary to obtain a full effect, but the absence of stapedial reflex did not prevent the effect from occurring.

The aim of this study was to investigate the human peripheral auditory system in either ear to allow comparison of right and left medial olivocochlear inhibition during contralateral ear stimulation with a broad band noise. The efferent system showed a statistically significant greater right-side activity among 44 young subjects. This laterality appeared to be related to the presence of spontaneous otoacoustic emission but not to gender. This efferent asymmetry and the parallel spontaneous otoacoustic emission asymmetry could explain the lateralization of auditory sensitivity, temporary threshold shift and tinnitus.

Input-output (I/O) functions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) were obtained over a 12 dB range for 64 normally hearing adult listeners with and without contralateral broadband noise (BBN). Contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) is a convenient way of suppressing responses to ipsilateral stimuli, probably acting via the medial olivocochlear system (MOCS). The present study shows that this contralateral sound suppression of CEOAEs is largest at low stimulus levels. In fact, the curves obtained under CAS approach the curves obtained without CAS as stimulus level rises. I/O slope analysis for the whole study population (n = 64) showed a slight but significant rise in slope with BBN, which may be interpreted as I/O function decompression. A loss of contralateral suppression effect at high ipsilateral stimulus levels was found in both very low and very high amplitude CEOAE subjects, despite the fact that I/O slopes differed between these two groups, whereas rise in slope under contralateral stimulation failed to be found for these same 2 groups of 16 subjects each. These findings clearly indicate that the MOCS is mostly functional at low sound levels, and suggest that the study of CEOAE I/O slope alteration under CAS may help specify one form of MOCS action on cochlear functioning.

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) evoked by click stimuli were recorded in both ears of 20 normal human subjects, in the presence and absence of a contralateral masking broad band noise. No difference in the amplitude of OAE suppression was noted between the first tested ear and the second one. In addition, 20 pathological subjects were tested according to the same protocol. Ten of them belonged to a group of patients whose vestibular nerve was sectioned on one side to relieve incapacitating vertigo and thus represented a group in whom olivocochlear efferents were severed. A great reduction of suppression observed in the operated ear suggested that olivocochlear efferent fibers are necessary to obtain a full suppressive effect. Three of the pathological subjects were patients who had undergone a decompression of the facial nerve which necessitated the same surgical approach as vestibular neurotomy, but without any section of vestibular fibers. This surgical control group demonstrated that the surgical act by itself cannot explain the difference observed in the neurotomized group. Finally, seven of the pathological subjects were patients with Bell's palsy, which paralyses the facial nerve and abolishes the stapedial reflex. No suppression difference was observed between healthy ears and ears without stapedial reflex. Therefore, it appeared that the stapedial reflex was not involved in the contralateral suppression of EOAEs. However, as the tensor tympani muscle remained functional in these patients, its involvement in the suppressive effect cannot be excluded.

Simple loudness adaptation and crossed olivocochlear feedback were investigated--through the Tone Decay Test (TDT) and Transiently Evoked Otoacoustic Emission (TEOAE) recording, respectively--in a sample of normal-hearing subjects including both musicians and non-musicians. The results for musicians and non-musicians differed statistically: the musicians showed on average less loudness adaptation and a greater reduction in TEOAE amplitude under contralateral acoustic stimulation, suggesting a stronger medial efferent feedback on the auditory periphery in these subjects. This finding, that not only psychoacoustic performance but also the physiological mechanism is different in musicians, strongly suggests that the latter should, like the former, be influenced by auditory "training" such as music studies. This perspective is discussed in detail in the text, since it raises puzzling questions and outlined promising issues in the field of auditory psychophysiology.

A young patient with normal pure-tone thresholds in both ears underwent a unilateral vestibular neurotomy in January 1992 to relieve severe vertigo ascribed to Ménière's disease. Evidence is provided that the whole vestibular nerve including the olivocochlear bundle (OCB) was sectioned. Just prior to the surgery, the patient was examined in several psychoacoustic tests involving mainly signal detection and selective attention. Over the next 20 months, he was reexamined in those same tests. The patient's ability to detect expected tones in the quiet (including audiograms) or in noise was the same as before the surgery. The one change was a marked improvement in the detection of unexpected signals in noise, which appears to reflect impaired selective attention. During those 20 months, new tests were also performed on discrimination, loudness, pitch, lateralization, and temporary threshold shift. On these tests, the only differences between the operated and unoperated ears concerned binaural diplacusis and loudness adaptation close to threshold, but these differences may well have been present prior to the surgery. Except with respect to what is probably selective attention, we uncovered no other clear role for the OCB in hearing. This outcome agrees with limited measurements on other patients, with their subjective reports, and with a number of published neurophysiological observations.

The present results are drawn from preliminary observations made in 28 patients suffering from unilateral, permanent, non-pulsatile tinnitus, who were systematically submitted to an investigation of their otoacoustic emissions in both ears. Spontaneous otoemissions (SOAE) were carefully looked for, before recording of transient evoked otoemissions (TEOAE). The effectiveness of the medial olivo-cochlear efferent system (MOC) was also tested. The comparison between TEOAE input/output curves obtained with and without contralateral stimulation allowed a global assessment of the functioning of MOC. Additional information relating to the MOC functioning at the precise frequency of tinnitus and/or around it, was available from the comparison of analogous curves obtained using distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) instead of TEOAEs. The results show that: (1) when the amplitude of otoacoustic emissions differs between the two ears, the tinnitus is generally lateralized on the side where amplitude was the lowest, which seems to be related to a greater hearing loss; (2) no general law concerning tinnitus can be drawn from the global testing of MOC functioning; the only result is that the slope of TEOAE input/output function appears as a deciding factor for efficiency of MOC, the least efficiency almost always occurring on the side where the slope is greater, and (3) even in the case of proved global effectiveness of MOC activation, there is, at least in the vicinity and in at least one ear, a part of the cochlea where its functioning is altered. A better comprehension of the mechanisms underlying this symptom will probably come from exhaustive exploration of individual cases rather than a rougher investigation of large samples in which different aetiologies are likely to be mixed.

The aim of this study was to investigate the functional development of cochlear active mechanisms and of the medial efferent olivocochlear system. Otoacoustic emissions (evoked and spontaneous) were recorded in 42 preterm neonates (conceptional age ranging form 33 to 39 weeks) and a control group of 20 young normal-hearing adults. Medial olivocochlear system activity was examined by coupling evoked otoacoustic emission recording to a contralateral stimulation. Otoacoustic emission recordings were carried out using the Otodynamic ILO88 software and hardware. The stimuli were unfiltered clicks and the contralateral stimulation was broad band noise of 50 and 70 dBSPL delivered by an Adam generator. The results revealed the presence of EOAEs and SOAEs from at least 33 weeks in humans, suggesting that the functional maturation of the outer hair cells is nearly complete at that age. The study further revealed that the contralateral stimulation had no effect on evoked otoacoustic emissions in preterm neonates. The lack of activity observed in medial olivocochlear system indicated functional immaturity here, at least before full-term birth.

A possible role of the efferent system in the mechanisms of tinnitus generation has been put forward by several authors. A simple method for studying the functioning of this system is to compare the amplitudes of otoemissions with and without mild contralateral stimulation. In a recent communication, Veuillet et al. (1991) reported that, on the side of tinnitus, the efferent system of patients suffering from unilateral tinnitus seems to be less efficient than on the other side. The results presented here correspond to those obtained in the very first tinnitus patients submitted to a research protocol exploring systematically the efferent system. When possible, the effectiveness was tested in two ways: globally, using evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) and, very precisely in the frequency zone of the tinnitus, using cubic distortion product 2f1-f2. Preliminary results obtained in bilateral and unilateral tinnitus sufferers show that a majority of them exhibits, at least in the proximity of the tinnitus, a lack of effectiveness of the efferent system. In some of them, instead of the suppressive effect, an increasing one was even observed.

Otoacoustic emission (OAE) generation mechanisms reside in the active micromechanical properties of the organ of Corti, and especially in the outer hair cells (OHCs). OHCs are strongly innervated by medial efferent olivo-cochlear fibres. Decrease of the intensity of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TOAEs) and modification of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) during acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear have already been shown in humans. Similar results were obtained in guinea pigs with a decrease of 2F1-F2 acoustic distortion products (DPOAEs) and a suppression of the effect with sectioning of the floor of the fourth ventricle. The present study sought to investigate the influence of contralateral auditory stimulation on DPOAEs recorded in humans. It shows a decrease in DPOAE intensity for all frequencies, at levels above 45 dB SPL of contralateral broad band noise. This effect was found at levels of contralateral BBN well below the acoustic reflex threshold, and in subjects without acoustic reflex. Moreover, the influence of transcranial transmission could be ruled out since no effect was found when contralateral BBN applied to the altered ear of totally unilaterally deaf patients. Thus, the contralateral acoustic stimulation effect on DPOAEs provides a new means of functional exploration of the medial efferent system in humans. The effect obtained is more ample at low primary frequency levels. Moreover, as DPOAEs are known to be stronger and to show more irregular input/output function patterns in the vicinity of an SOAE, the influence of contralateral auditory stimulation was studied for DPOAEs recorded at 10 Hz, 50 Hz and 150 Hz from an SOAE frequency.

It is possible by studying the Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (EOAEs) to detect an effect of selective attention on the cochlea. The authors present the main data of the literature and the results of their works. They show an effect of visual attention as well as auditory attention on the EOAEs. This effect is not the same whether attention is visual or auditory. There is a result of selective attention as early as the cochlear level.