Search

This retrospective controlled study aimed at comparing two techniques for recovering testicular spermatozoa in azoospermic patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). 102 men suffering from infertility because of obstructive azoospermia had ICSI using testicular spermatozoa recovered either by open excisional biopsy (n = 51), or by fine needle aspiration (FNA) (n = 51). A higher average number of spermatozoa were recovered after open biopsy than after FNA, but no significant differences in either fertilization rates or cleavage rates were observed after ICSI with spermatozoa retrieved by the two techniques. Neither was there any significant difference in ongoing pregnancy and implantation rates: in the FNA group, these figures were respectively 19.6% per cycle and 7.8% per embryo transferred and in the open biopsy group 21.6 and 7.1%. We conclude that ICSI with testicular spermatozoa recovered by FNA yields results comparable to those obtained with spermatozoa recovered by open biopsy in azoospermic patients with normal spermatogenesis. However a prospective study is needed to confirm the present results and to assess recovery rates and patient comfort for the two methods.

The rationale and results of using epididymal and testicular spermatozoa with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for zoospermic patients are reviewed. A total of 128 consecutive ICSI/MESA cycles and a total of 120 consecutive ICSI/TESE cycles were performed up to December 1994. The two-pronuclei fertilization rate per intact oocyte (observed after the injection) was 58% and 60%, respectively, when epididymal and testicular spermatozoa were used. The embryo transfer rate was similar for the two procedures (91% after ICSI/MESA and 90% after ICSI/TESE). Fifty women became pregnant (positive HCG) when epididymal spermatozoa were used (39% per cycle and 40% per embryo transfer). These results are comparable to those obtained when ejaculated spermatozoa are used.