Search

Background: As the population ages, the concept of frailty becomes increasingly relevant and may be considered a precursor between aging and the development of dementia in later life. Similarly, the construct of cognitive reserve (CR) is an accepted model of cognitive resilience that may account for individual differences in trajectories of brain aging, mitigating the clinical expression of dementia. Objective: We aim to estimate the role of CR and frailty in moderating the prediction of dementia in the population aged over 80 who are attending an Italian outpatient memory clinic. Methods: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) to screen for frailty, and Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq) to evaluate CR, were used to assess patients systematically. We performed multivariate logistic regression to assess associations with dementia. Model performance and interaction between frailty and cognitive reserve were then evaluated. Results: 166 patients were consecutively enrolled (mean age was 85.7 years old, females composed 68%); 25% had a diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and 75% had a diagnosis of dementia. Multivariate regression analysis showed that CRIq and CFS were the main clinical assessment tools associated with the presence of dementia, even after collinearity adjustment. No significant interaction of CFS*CRIq was found. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between CR, frailty, dementia, and their related interacting terms in a real-world population of very old patients. Our findings may suggest that both CR and frailty shape an individual's resilience throughout their lifetime. This may potentially counteract the effects of brain neuropathology, in line with the hypothesis that meaningful associations exist between CR, frailty, and cognition in later life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The primary aim of the study was determining the validation of the modified 19‐item Frailty Index (mFI‐19), based on the standard procedure for creating a frailty index scoring in the accumulation deficit theory of Rockwood and comparing it with the gold standard comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in old age patients with hip fracture. As a secondary aim, we compared prognostic accuracies of mFI‐19 and CGA in predicting long‐term mortality after surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 364 older patients with hip fractures, each a candidate for surgery, were consecutively enrolled. All were subjected to CGA and mFI‐19 at baseline and time to death (years from hip surgery) were collected prospectively. Results: Mean patient age was 86.5 (SD: 5.65) years. The most common clinical phenotype (77%) was frail. Both CGA and mFI‐19 performed similarly in predicting long‐term mortality (Harrell's C‐index: 0.66 and 0.68, respectively). Conclusions: The mFI‐19 was validated, compared to the gold standard CGA, based on a systematic process for creating a frailty index in relation to the accumulation deficit. This is one of few prospective studies addressing long‐term mortality in older adults with hip fractures, invoking a methodologically robust frailty screening assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Optimizing the approach to older adults with cancer is now a priority given the increasing frequency of new cancer diagnoses that are made in the older population. The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) represents the gold‐standard for (1) defining prognosis and ability to withstand cancer treatments, (2) exploring the multiple aspects that define the complexity of frail older persons, and (3) designing person‐tailored interventions. Materials and methods: In this document, based on a comprehensive revision of the literature, the Italian Society for Geriatrics and Gerontology proposes a CGA model (ONCOGER CGA) to be adopted by oncology centers for their routine approach to older patients with cancer. Results and discussion: A widespread use of this standardized CGA format will facilitate comparisons across institutions, promote studies based on a multidimensional patient assessment, and foster the inclusion of geriatric endpoints in oncological clinical trials. Furthermore, we predict that the use of a standardized CGA approach will increase the integration of geriatricians into oncology care teams with the final result of improving therapeutic choices and clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hip fracture is a major health problem and a patient's biological age, comorbidity, and cognitive vulnerability have an impact on its related outcomes. Length of stay (LOS) for these highly vulnerable patients is rather long and the possible causes have not been clearly identified yet.Objective: We aimed to assess the main clinical factors associated with protracted LOS, focusing on delirium with or without dementia in older age hip fractured patients.Methods: 218 subjects (mean age 86.70±6.18 years), admitted to the Orthogeriatric Unit of the Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (Italy), were recruited. All patients received physical and comprehensive geriatric assessment. Days to surgery, days from surgery to rehabilitation, and LOS were recorded. In-hospital and three months' mortality were reported.Results: Prevalent delirium at hospital admission was of 3.1%. 35% of patients developed incident delirium. 56.4% were affected by dementia of Alzheimer-type. In addition, 52% of patients developed delirium superimposed to dementia. Mean LOS was 13.5±4.99 days. Namely, delirium, time to surgery, and complication rate disproportionally affected LOS. The analysis with 3 months mortality, based on cognitive vulnerability profiles, showed how delirium mainly affect short-term mortality in patients with dementia.Conclusion: Our exploratory study originally pointed out the high incidence of delirium superimposed to dementia in orthogeriatric wards and how delirium turns to be a moderator of LOS. The results meet the need for additional research by virtue of a deeper understanding of the impact of delirium and dementia on orthogeriatric clinical management and outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pain is still a neglected clinical issue in elderly people with dementia and/or communicative disorders, with an unacceptable higher rate of under diagnosis and under treatment. Cognitive deficit and emotional and psychological disturbances entangle pain symptoms, affecting patient self-report. So far, observational pain tools do not have fully adequate clinimetric properties and quality requirements for easy-to-use daily rating. Older patients with dementia represent a clinical challenge. The assessment of pain is important for improving clinical outcomes, such as functional status, frailty trajectories, comorbidity, and quality of life. The PAINAID scale appears to be the most accurate pain tool in people with dementia along with the Algoplus® scale, a recently developed tool to rapidly assess acute pain in hospitals settings. The present study aimed to assess the clinimetric properties of the Algoplus®, as compared to PAINAID, for detecting acute pain in a real-world cohort of hospitalized older patients with dementia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem and represents the only cardiac disease continuing to increase in prevalence, in particular among elderly patients. The frequent rehospitalizations have a negative impact on quality of life of patients with HF, constituting a substantial cost for patients and the health system. The aim of this review was to look into biochemical, echocardiographic and socioeconomical parameters as predictors of clinical outcomes and rehospitalizations. Methods: This narrative review is based on the material searched for and obtained via PubMed from January 2000 up to March 2018. The search terms we used were as follows: "elderly, heart failure, cardiovascular" in combination with "biomarker, echocardiography and hospitalization." Results: This review analyses the potential predictive role of biochemical and echocardiographic and socioeconomical parameters on clinical outcomes (particularly cardiovascular) and hospital readmissions in patients with chronic HF. We focused on risk stratification of elderly patients with HF, who constitute a category of frail subjects at higher risk for readmission to hospital. Conclusions: In elderly subjects with chronic HF, the risk stratification could benefit of a multiparametric approach combining biochemical, echocardiographic, demographic and socioeconomical parameters, thus ensuring a better quality of life and at the same time a better allocation of financial resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]