Search

The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties and screening accuracy of the Brain Injury Screening Index (BISI), a self-report questionnaire designed to identify a history of acquired brain injury. The study was conducted in a closed male prison in the UK. The purposive sample comprised 55 male prisoners who arrived at the establishment during the study. A repeated measures design was used, where the Brain Injury Screening Index (BISI) was administered on three occasions. Inter-rater reliability was poor to moderate, but test retest reliability was moderate to good. Medical records were not available for all participants, but the limited number obtained resulted in a sensitivity of.38 to.71 and specificity of.47 to.70 across the three screening administrations of the BISI. The limitations of the present findings are discussed in the context of the use of the tool in custodial environments. It is argued that these results suggest that, when used as recommended, the BISI has acceptable reliability and validity as an initial screen for identifying individuals who should receive support and a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment, and it merits further investigation and development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties and screening accuracy of the Brain Injury Screening Index (BISI), a self-report questionnaire designed to identify a history of acquired brain injury. The study was conducted in a closed male prison in the UK. The purposive sample comprised 55 male prisoners who arrived at the establishment during the study. A repeated measures design was used, where the Brain Injury Screening Index (BISI) was administered on three occasions. Inter-rater reliability was poor to moderate, but test retest reliability was moderate to good. Medical records were not available for all participants, but the limited number obtained resulted in a sensitivity of .38 to .71 and specificity of .47 to .70 across the three screening administrations of the BISI. The limitations of the present findings are discussed in the context of the use of the tool in custodial environments. It is argued that these results suggest that, when used as recommended, the BISI has acceptable reliability and validity as an initial screen for identifying individuals who should receive support and a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment, and it merits further investigation and development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study employed a correlational and group comparison design to investigate whether self-report of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a sample of male prisoners screened using the Brain Injury Screening Index (BISI) was associated with impaired cognitive performance on standardised questionnaires and neuropsychological tests. A total of 139 male prisoners who reported having suffered a TBI in the BISI were interviewed, and completed further questionnaires and neuropsychological assessments. Their results were compared to 50 prisoners who had no reported history of TBI. The results of the screening questionnaire correlated with responses in a follow-up interview, with self-report questionnaires of neurobehavioural disorder (.31 to .50) and neuropsychological measures (−.24 to −.45). The “TBI Index”, an indicator summarising the number and severity of self-reported injuries in a single score, also correlated well with scores on formal neuropsychological tests (–.20 to –.42). Self-report of traumatic brain injury among prisoners is consistently associated with measurable neuropsychological and neurobehavioural disability. The implications of these findings for current practice in identifying and referring individuals to specialist services are considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]