Search

Purpose: The objectives were: (1) to translate and adapt the International Society of Wheelchair Professional (ISWP) basic Wheelchair Service Provision Test (bWSPT) into French-Canadian and (2) to conduct a preliminary evaluation of the French-Canadian version of the ISWP bWSPT internal consistency and relations with other variables among French-Canadian occupational therapy students., Methods: For Phase 1, based on the International Test Commission Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests, a forward translation and adaptation from English to French-Canadian was conducted by a translation team. For Phase 2, the validity evidence of the French-Canadian bWSPT was evaluated through internal consistency and comparison of bWSPT scores and final grades of a wheelchair-specific course with a sample of occupational therapy students (positive, moderate correlation hypothesized). Internal consistency was measured with Cronbach's α . The correlation was calculated using the Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient., Results: For phase 1, 61 of 167 items of the forward adaptation were revised and modified. All revisions were a consensus by the translation team. For phase 2, we found a Cronbach's α of 0.50 and a correlation of ⍴ = 0.27 ( p  = 0.43) between the bWSPT French-Canadian version and the wheelchair-specific course final grade. The low variability of the data may explain the lower-than-expected correlation. Other possible data-driven reasons have been explored using post-hoc analysis., Conclusion: The ISWP bWSPT, French-Canadian version, is not internally consistent and demonstrates a non-statistically significant, positive, weak correlation with the final grade of a wheelchair service provision-specific course among a cohort of 35 occupational therapy students.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe lack of adequately educated wheelchair service providers is a contributing factor to inappropriate wheelchair provision worldwide.The ISWP Wheelchair Service Provision Basic Test (ISWP bWSPT) has been created to evaluate competency among wheelchair service providers and provides a standardized test recognized internationally.A French-Canadian version of the ISWP bWSPT allows competency testing of French-speaking wheelchair service providers across Canada.This study shows that the French-Canadian version of the test is not internally consistent and has a low correlation with a wheelchair provision-specific course among a cohort of 35 occupational therapy students at a French-Canadian university suggesting further refinement is required to improve its measurement properties in this population of test-takers.

Occupational therapists in Canada play a central role in wheelchair service provision. Inadequate entry-to-practice professional education has been identified as a major concern in the delivery of wheelchair related services. The goal of this study was to describe the current education provided in Canadian occupational therapy programs and to map this content against the recommended WHO 8-step wheelchair service provision process. The study used a descriptive cross-sectional online survey design. Educators were recruited from accredited occupational therapy programs in Canada. Participants completed a short sociodemographic questionnaire and a survey with 97 closed- and open-ended questions regarding the wheelchair service provision education provided in their curriculum. Survey data was then mapped according to the WHO 8-step wheelchair service provision process. Twenty-nine educators from all Canadian occupational therapy programs (n = 14) were enrolled. Most participants (55.2%) were full-time faculty members that had been teaching in occupational therapy programs for an average time of 10.9 years. All programs covered at least 4 of the WHO recommended steps, but only 5 programs covered all steps. Assessment and Prescription steps were covered in every program while the Referral & Appointment, Funding & Ordering, Fitting and User Training steps were covered in most programs. The pedagogic approach, the amount of time dedicated to wheelchair-related content, and the type of evaluation used varied greatly between programs. This study is the first to provide a detailed description of wheelchair service provision education across all Canadian occupational therapy programs according to the WHO 8 steps and provides a foundation for collaborative efforts to promote best practice in entry-to-practice professional education., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Objective: To test the hypothesis that occupational therapy students who receive wheelchair skills training education using a distributed-practice university-course approach versus a condensed-practice boot-camp approach results in greater improvements post-intervention in relevant outcomes. Design: A quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control group design. Setting: A university occupational therapy program. Participants: Occupational therapy students (experimental group) and recent occupational therapy graduates (control group) ( N  = 58). Interventions: A 15-week, 45-hour wheelchair provision course in which a total of 24 hours were dedicated to wheelchair skills testing and training education (experimental group) versus an 8-hour wheelchair skills training boot-camp (control group). Main outcome measures: Assessments were conducted pre- and post-intervention using the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q), Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale for Manual Wheelchair Users (WheelCon) and Self-Efficacy on Assessing, Training and Spotting wheelchair skills (SEATS). Results: Compared to baseline, the WST-Q, WheelCon and SEATS scores improved significantly for both groups ( p  < .001). There were no significant differences in change scores (post-intervention - baseline values) between the groups for WST-Q, WheelCon or SEATS scores, however, the experimental group demonstrated a trend ( p  < .051) of higher scores for all outcome measures. Conclusions: Occupational therapy students who received wheelchair skills training using either a distributed-practice university-course or condensed-practice boot-camp approach demonstrated significant post-training improvements in their WST-Q, WheelCon and SEATS scores, but no significant differences were found between groups. Implications for Rehabilitation Both a distributed-practice university-course approach and a condensed-practice bootcamp approach for training wheelchair skills to occupational therapy students results in large post-intervention improvements in wheelchair skill, wheelchair confidence and self-efficacy to test, train, spot and document wheelchair skills. The pre-education (optional course) wheelchair skill, wheelchair confidence and self-efficacy to test, train, spot and document wheelchair skills scores found in this cohort of occupational therapy students confirms the need to include this wheelchair content in mandatory occupational therapy curricula.

Background/aim: The Assistive Technology Outcome Profile for Mobility (ATOP/M) was designed to isolate the impact of mobility assistive technology on perceived difficulty with activity and participation. The study objectives were to examine its measurement properties (test-retest reliability and convergent validity) and applicability for middle-aged and older power wheelchair (PWC) users., Methods: Four ATOP/M subscales were administered using computer adaptive testing (activity with mobility device, activity without mobility device, participation with mobility device, participation without mobility device). Test-retest reliability (4-wk interval), convergent validity (a priori hypothesis testing of correlations with participation (Late-life Disability Instrument) and mobility (Life-space Assessment)) and applicability (respondent burden, distributions) were examined with 116 PWC users between 50 and 85 years of age presenting with a variety of diagnoses., Results: When using powered mobility, perceived difficulty with activity and participation scores were similar to the general population of mobility devices users (T-score range 46.3-53.7), while activity and participation were significantly lower without mobility devices (T-score range 35.3-39.4). Test-retest reliability intra-class coefficients of the four subscales ranged between 0.82 and 0.91, and convergent validity was supported by moderate correlations (r = 0.35-0.47). Respondent burden was higher for the without devices subscales and none of the subscales had significant floor/ceiling effects., Conclusion: Our results provide support for reliability and convergent validity of the ATOP/M for PWC users. Specific strategies were recommended to optimise applicability with this population such as administration guidelines for reframing the without device scale and timing of data collection., (© 2018 Occupational Therapy Australia.)

Purpose: To evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity and responsiveness of the Wheelchair Skills Test - Questionnaire (WST-Q) Version 4.1 for powered wheelchair users., Methods: A volunteer sample of 72 community-dwelling, experienced powered wheelchair users, ranging in age from 50 to 77 years, participated in this study. Participants completed measures at baseline and 1 month later., Results: Mean ± standard deviation total percentage WST-Q scores at baseline and 1 month were 83.7% ± 10.9 and 86.3% ± 10.0 respectively. Cronbach's alpha was 0.90 and the 1 month test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC1,1) was 0.78 (confidence interval: 0.68-0.86). There were no floor or ceiling effects. Percentages of agreement between baseline and 1 month for individual skills ranged from 72.2% to 100%. The correlations between the WST-Q and the objective Wheelchair Skills Test (WST), WheelCon and Life Space Assessment were r = 0.65, r = 0.47 and r = 0.47 respectively. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest real difference (SRD) were 5.0 and 6.2 respectively., Conclusion: The WST-Q 4.1 has high internal consistency, strong test-retest reliability and strong support for concurrent validity and responsiveness., Implications for Rehabilitation: There is evidence of reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Wheelchair Skills Test - Questionnaire (WST-Q) among experienced older adult powered wheelchair users. The WST-Q can be used to measure powered wheelchair skills, guide intervention and measure change over time.

Purpose: The Wheelchair Skills Training Program (WSTP) is underutilized in pediatrics for training manual wheelchair skills because the voluminous manual lacks pediatric specificity and no materials adapted for pediatric manual wheelchair users (PMWUs) are available. A set of resources (storybook, posters, training workbook) based on the WSTP has previously been developed for training basic indoor wheelchair skills with five to 15-year-old PMWUs. Occupational therapists (OTs) and PMWUs expressed a need for additional resources addressing higher-level skills. Two new sets of resources teaching indoor and community wheelchair skills were developed. Objective: Describe OTs' and PMWUs' satisfaction and perceptions regarding usability, relevance and feasibility in pediatrics with the new resources. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted. A focus group and interviews were respectively conducted with a convenience sample of OTs and a criterion sample of PMWUs to document perceptions regarding satisfaction, usability, relevance and feasibility. A deductive approach to data analyses was used following the Framework Method. Results: Six OTs expressed satisfaction regarding both sets of resources feeling more confident using the WSTP (relevance) and perceiving potential time efficiencies when planning training interventions (feasibility). They provided suggestions to improve the usability of the second set. Six PMWUs participated in the interviews, two of which provided feedback on both sets. They were satisfied with the resources recommending them to novice and temporary PMWUs aged from three to 11 years. Conclusion: Participants' suggested the resources may contribute to reducing the gap between the evidence supporting the WSTP and its utilization in pediatrics. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Two sets of knowledge transfer resources based on the Wheelchair Skills Training Program (WSTP) are pediatric-friendly materials that could be used in rehabilitation settings to train wheelchair skills among novice and temporary manual wheelchair users. Both sets of knowledge transfer resources may help bridge the gap between the evidence supporting the WSTP and its utilization in pediatrics by responding to clinicians' needs for playful, easy-to-use and condensed materials to use in their interventions. The perspectives of occupational therapists and pediatric manual wheelchair users are important to improve the wheelchair skills training resources so that they align with both knowledge users' needs and preferences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Manual wheelchair (MWC) confidence is a predictor of adult life-space mobility and social participation. To date, scientific literature specific to pediatric MWC confidence is scarce which prevents in-depth understanding. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of pediatric MWC users (PMWU), parents, and occupational therapists regarding pediatric MWC confidence. Five focus groups were conducted with PMWUs (n = 12) and occupational therapists (n = 9), and semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of PMWUs (n = 2). Inductive thematic analysis was performed following verbatim transcription of audio recorded material. Three overarching themes were identified across PMWUs, parents, and occupational therapists: (1) "MWC confidence is not a clinical priority" depicted the construct's varying level of clinical priority and perceived abstractness; (2) "MWC confidence is both a child and parent consideration" revealed nuances between the PMWU's MWC confidence and the parents' perception of the PMWU's MWC confidence; and (3) "Opportunities to develop MWC confidence are context-specific" contrasted afforded and unafforded opportunities to experience independent MWC mobility. Pediatric MWC confidence is an important aspect of wheelchair use that is shaped by a multitude of factors in PMWU's lives. This new area of pediatric study provides support for the need to measure this important construct. This study is the first to explore children's, parents', and occupational therapists' perceptions of pediatric MWC confidence. Pediatric MWC confidence impacts MWC use in a multifaceted fashion. Future studies should consider the development and validation of a self-report measure to assess pediatric MWC confidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: An estimated 75 million people with disabilities need wheelchairs globally, of whom 5–15% have one. Access to an appropriate wheelchair requires rehabilitation professionals trained to provide wheelchair service. One aim of the International Society of Wheelchair Professionals (ISWP) is to promote and facilitate the integration of wheelchair service provision education into academic rehabilitation programs worldwide. To inform the development of integration strategies, the purpose of this study was to develop an in-depth global portrait of the wheelchair service provision education offered in academic rehabilitation programs, the process of its integration and the associated facilitators and barriers. Method: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 14 representatives from academic rehabilitation programs (i.e., occupational therapy, physical therapy, and prosthetics and orthotics) in 11 countries, including low, middle and upper resourced settings. Findings: Thematic data analyses identified three overarching themes. The first theme, "impact of context", portrays factors related to local population needs, governance and supply chain of equipment and service delivery. The second theme, "current and planned wheelchair education", describes the content, pedagogic approach, student evaluation and feedback process. The third theme, "integration process", details five states of this process. Conclusions: This study describes in-depth the wheelchair service provision education across academic rehabilitation programs and resource settings, illustrating the context-dependent nature of its integration. This understanding may assist the global community of educators in preparing future rehabilitation professionals to better serve wheelchair users. This work has informed the development of ISWP's Seating and Mobility Academic Resource Toolkit (). The Dynamics of Context-Dependent Integration of Wheelchair Service Provision Education in Curricula model, depicting the findings of this study, may help to inform key stakeholders (i.e., academic institutions, health care providers and policy makers) about potential barriers and facilitators to the implementation of adequate wheelchair service provision education in the curricula of academic rehabilitation program. Study findings may lead to creative strategies, such as the expansion of ISWP's Seating and Mobility Academic Resource Toolkit (SMART; ), that may enable academic rehabilitation programs to be a part of the solution to strengthening rehabilitation systems worldwide, through appropriately trained rehabilitation professionals in wheelchair service provision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: In Québec, Canada, the prevalence of children using powered mobility (PM) is not reflective of evidence supporting its use and for achieving developmental milestones. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of four key stakeholder groups in a metropolitan area regarding daily use, barriers, facilitators, and clinical practice associated with use of PM. Methods: Using convenience sampling, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with children (n = 6), parents (n = 2), rehabilitation center occupational therapists (OTs; n = 4), and special needs school-based OTs (n = 6). Drawings were used as a supplemental data collection strategy with children. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim to conduct thematic analysis. Results: Three overarching themes were identified: (1) "A sense of liberty, except...", highlighting environmental obstacles reducing social participation; (2) "A necessity, for better or for worse," covering benefits and drawbacks of PM; and (3) "First choice versus last resort," raising clinical differences related to provision, assessment, and training. Conclusions: Stakeholders' perceptions illustrated benefits of PM, yet use is contingent on the physical, institutional, and societal environments, leading stakeholders to feel both powerful and powerless as users, parents, or clinicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]