Search

Noise pollution has grown to be a major public health issue worldwide. We sought to profile serum metabolite expression changes related to occupational noise exposure by untargeted metabolomics, as well as to evaluate the potential roles of serum metabolites in occupational noise-associated arterial stiffness (AS). Our study involved 30 noise-exposed industrial personnel (Lipo group) and 30 noise-free controls (Blank group). The untargeted metabolomic analysis was performed by employing a UPLC-HRMS. The associations of occupational noise and significant differential metabolites (between Blank/Lipo groups) with AS were evaluated using multivariable-adjusted generalized linear models. We performed the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis to further screen for AS's risk metabolites. We explored 177 metabolites across 21 categories significantly differentially expressed between Blank/Lipo groups, and these metabolites were enriched in 20 metabolic pathways. Moreover, 15 metabolites in 4 classes (including food, glycerophosphocholine, sphingomyelin [SM] and triacylglycerols [TAG]) were adversely associated with AS (all P < 0.05). Meanwhile, five metabolites (homostachydrine, phosphatidylcholine (PC) (32:1e), PC (38:6p), SM (d41:2) and TAG (45:1) have been proven to be useful predictors of AS prevalence. However, none of these 15 metabolites were found to have a mediating influence on occupational noise-induced AS. Our study reveals specific metabolic changes caused by occupational noise exposure, and several metabolites may have protective effects on AS. However, the roles of serum metabolites in noise-AS association remain to be validated in future studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims: We aimed to evaluate the association of occupational noise with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components, and to assess the potential role of miRNAs in occupational noise-associated MetS., Methods: A total of 854 participants were enrolled in our study. Cumulative noise exposure (CNE) was estimated in conjunction with workplace noise test records and research participants' employment histories. Logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders were used to assess the association of CNE and miRNAs with MetS and its components., Results: We observed linear positive dose-response associations between occupational noise exposure and the prevalence of MetS (OR: 1.031; 95 % CI: 1.008, 1.055). And linear and nonlinear relationship were also found for the association of occupational noise exposure with high blood pressure (OR: 1.024; 95 % CI: 1.007, 1.041) and reduced high-density lipoprotein (OR: 1.051; 95 % CI: 1.031, 1.072), respectively. MiR-200a-3p, miR-92a-3p and miR-21-5p were inversely associated with CNE, or the prevalence of MetS and its components (all P < 0.05). However, we did not find any statistically significant mediation effect of miRNAs in the associations of CNE with MetS. Furthermore, the prevalence of bilateral hearing loss in high-frequency increased (OR: 1.036; 95 % CI: 1.008, 1.067) with CNE level rising, and participants with bilateral hearing loss in high-frequency had a significantly higher risk of MetS (OR: 1.727; 95 % CI: 1.048, 2.819)., Conclusion: Our study suggests that occupational noise exposure is associated with MetS and its components, and the role of miRNAs in noise-induced increasing MetS risk needs to be confirmed in future studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Evidence on the association between occupational noise exposure and blood pressure is inconsistent, and the underlying mechanism remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the association between occupational noise exposure and blood pressure, and explore the potential role of miRNAs in the association. A total of 894 subjects from two companies in Wuhan, China were included. Occupational noise exposure was assessed using cumulative noise exposure (CNE), and six candidate plasma miRNAs (miR-92a-3p, miR-21-5p, miR-200a-3p, miR-200b-3p, miR-200c-3p, and miR-1-3p) which were not only associated with blood pressure/hypertension but also related to oxidative stress were selected according to previous studies and tested. A linear dose-response relationship was found between occupational noise exposure and blood pressure, including systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Each 1-unit increase in CNE levels was significantly associated with a 0.130 (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.026, 0.234) unit increase in SBP and a 0.141 (95 % CI = 0.063, 0.219) unit increase in DBP. However, the association between occupational noise and hypertension is not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In the meanwhile, occupational noise exposure was negatively associated with miRNA-92a-3p (β = -0.019, 95 % CI = -0.032, -0.006) and miRNA-21-5p (β = -0.031, 95 % CI = -0.052, -0.010), and miRNA-92a-3p mediated 24.66 % of the association between occupational noise exposure and DBP. In addition, bilateral high-frequency hearing loss was not only positively associated with occupational noise exposure (OR = 1.974, 95 % CI = 1.084, 3.702) but also DBP (β = 2.546, 95 % CI = 0.160, 4.932). Our study suggests that occupational noise exposure is positively associated with SBP and DBP, and miRNA-92a-3p partially mediate the association between occupational noise exposure and DBP., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Previous studies have explored the association between noise exposure and risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS); however, the results remain inconclusive., Methods: PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched through December 2020, multivariate-adjusted relative risks (RRs) were pooled by using random-effects models. Subgroup analysis was also conducted stratifying by gender, study location, study design, source of noise, study quality, adjusting for smoking, drinking, body mass index, physical activity and shift work., Results: Five studies involving 44,698 participants and 5187 MetS cases were included. A summarized adjusted RR for the relationship between noise exposure and risk of MetS was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.02-1.60), and 1.11 (1.02-1.21) for blood pressure and 1.11 (1.06-1.17) for blood glucose. Subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled risk of MetS was statistically significant in all cohort studies (RR = 1.34, 95 %CI, 1.06-1.68), ambient/traffic noise (RR = 1.24, 95 %CI, 1.13-1.35) and occupational noise by removing one low quality study (RR = 2.21, 95 %CI, 1.41-3.44)., Conclusions: Noise exposure is associated with an increased risk of MetS, and occupational noise exposure may result in a greater risk. Additional more prospective large-scale studies conducted in more countries or populations are needed to confirm the results, establish causality and elucidate the underlying mechanisms., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We aimed to explore the association of occupational noise exposure with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in Chinese adults. We included 21,412 participants from the Dongfeng-tongji Cohort Study, occupational noise exposure was evaluated through workplace noise level and/or the job titles, hearing loss was defined as a pure-tone mean of 25 dB or higher at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz in any ear. Compared with participants without occupational noise exposure, the 10-year ASCVD risk was significantly higher for noise exposure duration ≥20 years (OR = 1.20, 95%CI = 1.05-1.32) after adjusting for potential confounders. In the subgroup analysis, the association was only statistically significant in males (OR = 1.86, 95%CI = 1.12-3.14) and participants aged equal to or over 60 years old (OR = 1.20, 95%CI = 1.05-1.33), but not in females (OR = 1.15, 95%CI = 0.71-1.92) and aged below 60 (OR = 1.51, 95%CI = 0.75-2.85). In the subsample analyses (N = 10,165), bilateral hearing loss was associated with a higher risk of 10-year ASCVD (OR = 1.72, 95%CI = 1.30-2.30), especially for participants who were males (OR = 2.40, 95%CI = 1.61-3.42) and aged equal to or over 60 (OR = 1.85, 95%CI = 1.40-2.44). The present study suggests that occupational noise exposure may be a potential risk factor for ASCVD, especially for males and older participants., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

We aimed to estimate the prevalence of hearing loss and influencing factors among workers in automobile manufacturing industry in Wuhan, China. We conducted cross-sectional analyses of 2017 through 2019 data from survey of the key occupational diseases on 17,176 workers in automobile manufacturing industry, Wuhan, China. Hearing loss was defined as a pure tone mean of 25 dB or higher in either ear at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz for speech frequency and at 3, 4, and 6 kHz for high frequency. Among the 17,176 workers, more than a quarter of participants had high frequency hearing loss, and 6.41% had speech frequency hearing loss. The prevalence of hearing loss was higher among participants with diabetes mellitus and current smoking, temporary tinnitus, and sudden change in hearing. Compared with the controls, age (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.08-1.09), male (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.21-1.63), occupational noise exposure (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.08-1.30), having temporary tinnitus (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.08-1.33), and having sudden change in hearing (OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.20-2.08) were associated with higher prevalence of high frequency hearing loss; meanwhile, age (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.08-1.09), male (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.11-1.71), having family history of hearing loss (OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.35-5.97), and having sudden change in hearing (OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.80-3.70) were associated with higher prevalence of speech frequency hearing loss. No additive and multiplicative interaction was found between occupational noise and these factors for hearing loss. Hearing loss directly affects 25% of workers in automobile manufacturing industry in Wuhan. Measures should be implemented for the control of occupational noise and other factors simultaneously in the workplace.

Objective: To evaluate the relationship of occupational noise, bilateral hearing loss with blood pressure and hypertension among a Chinese population., Methods: We included 15 422 individuals from a cross-sectional survey of the key occupational diseases in 2017 in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. Occupational noise exposure was evaluated through workplace noise level and/or the job titles. Hearing loss was defined as a pure-tone average of 25 dB or higher at speech frequency (0.5, 1, 2 kHz) or high frequency (3, 4, 6 kHz) in both ears. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure at least 140/90 mmHg or self-reported current use of antihypertensive medication., Results: Compared with participants without occupational noise exposure, the prevalence of hypertension was significantly higher for noise exposure duration of 5 to less than 10 years [odds ratio (OR) = 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.04-1.27] and at least 10 years (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.09-1.30). In the sex-specific analysis, the association was significantly pronounced in male (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.06-1.32 for duration of 5 to <10 years; OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.12-1.38 for duration ≥10 years), but not in female (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.80-1.11 for duration of 5 to <10 years; OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.90-1.20 for duration ≥10 years). In the subsample analyses, bilateral hearing loss was associated with a higher prevalence of hypertension, no matter for speech frequency hearing loss (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.02-1.30 for mild; OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.20-1.50 for severe) or for high-frequency hearing loss (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.03-1.50 for mild; OR = 2.40, 95% CI = 1.80-3.17 for severe). The sex-subgroup analysis of hearing loss with hypertension was similar as occupational noise and hypertension., Conclusion: Our study has suggested occupational noise exposure is a potential risk factor for hypertension., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The association between shift work and hearing loss is unclear. We aimed to evaluate this association in a Chinese population independently and in combination with occupational noise. A total of 11,196 participants of the Dongfeng-Tongji cohort study were included. Shift work was self-reported and hearing loss was defined as a pure-tone mean of 25 dB or higher at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz in any ear. The Robust Poisson method were used to assess the relationship between shift work and hearing loss, and the prevalence ratios (PRs) were calculated. Compared to individuals who reported no shift work, the PRs of bilateral hearing loss were significantly higher for a shift work duration of fewer than 10 years in women, (PR = 1.024, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.002-1.053), but not in men (PR = 1.016, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.998-1.035). The association between short duration of shift work and bilateral hearing loss was just statistically significant in women when those with occupational noise exposure were excluded (PR = 1.067, 95%CI = 1.015-1.122). When shift work and occupational noise exposure were combined, the PRs for hearing loss were highest among individuals with the longest shift work (≥10 years) and longest noise exposure (≥20 years) durations, whether for bilateral (PR = 1.114, 95%CI = 1.068-1.162) or any ear (PR = 1.065, 95%CI = 1.034-1.096). A short duration of shift work may be a risk factor for hearing loss in women and could increase the prevalence of hearing loss when combined with occupational noise., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The association between occupational noise exposure and hypertension is unclear. We aimed to explore the association in a Chinese population and to summarize our findings with previous published articles. The cross-sectional study included 22,450 participants from Dongfeng-Tongji Cohort Study. In a subsample of 10,636 subjects, we assessed the association between hearing loss and hypertension. For the meta-analysis, we searched PubMed and EMBASE until April 2017, and the pooled odds ratio (OR) was combined using a random effect model. Compared with participants without occupational noise exposure, the risk of hypertension was significantly higher for noise exposure duration ≥20 (OR = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-1.18). In the sex-specific analysis, the association was only significantly pronounced in males (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.03-1.31), but not in females (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.88-1.14). In the subsample analyses, hearing loss, which was an indicator for exposure to loud noise, was associated with a higher risk of hypertension, especially for participants who were bilateral hearing loss (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.24-1.54). In the meta-analysis, the pooled OR for the association between occupational noise exposure and hypertension was 1.25 (95% CI = 1.10-1.42). On the basis of an indicator for exposure to occupational noise, the cross-sectional study and meta-analysis identified occupational noise exposure as a potential risk factor for increased hypertension risk., (Copyright © 2017 American Society of Hypertension. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Combined effect of cigarette smoking and occupational noise exposure on hearing loss has rarely been evaluated among Chinese population, especially among females. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 11196 participants of Dongfeng-Tongji cohort study. Smoking status was self-reported through questionnaire and occupational noise exposure was evaluated through workplace noise level and/or the job titles. Hearing loss was defined as a pure-tone mean of 25 dB or higher at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz in both ears. Compared with participants without occupational noise exposure, the risk of hearing loss was significantly higher for noise exposure duration ≥20 (OR = 1.45, 95%CI = 1.28-1.65). The association was particularly evident among individuals who were males (OR = 1.74, 95%CI = 1.45-2.08) and aged ≥ 70 (OR = 1.74, 95%CI = 1.30-2.33). Similarly, the risks increased with the increasing of pack-years in males and all age groups except for those aged <60. As to the combined effect, the hearing loss risk was highest for noise exposure duration ≥20 and pack-years ≥25 (OR = 2.41, 95%CI = 1.78-3.28), especially among males (OR = 2.42, 95%CI = 1.74-3.37) and those aged ≥70 (OR = 2.76, 95%CI = 1.36-5.60). Smoking may be an independent risk factor for hearing loss. And it may synergistically affect hearing when combined with occupational noise exposure, especially among males and older participants.

We aimed to explore the association between occupational noise exposure duration and heart rate variability (HRV) and the underlying mechanism. A total of 449 subjects in a manufacturing company in Wuhan, China were included in our study and six candidate miRNAs (miR-200a-3p, miR-200b-3p, miR-200c-3p, miR-1-3p, miR-92a-3p and miR-21–5p) were tested among 200 individuals. Information combining the work histories and the occupational noise monitoring records were used to calculate the exposure of occupational noise, HRV indices were measured by using 3-channel digital Holter monitors, including the standard deviation of all normal R-R intervals (SDNN), the root mean of the square of successive differences between adjacent normal NN intervals (r-MSSD), SDNN index, low-frequency power (LF), high-frequency power (HF) and TP (total power). We found a significant linear negative dose-response relationship between occupational noise exposure duration and HRV indices (P for overall <0.05, P for nonlinear >0.05), including SDNN, r-MSSD, SDNN index, LF and HF. In the continuous models, the β (95% CIs) for each 1-year occupational noise exposure were −0.002 (−0.004, −0.001) for SDNN, −0.002 (−0.004, −0.001) for r-MSSD, −0.002 (−0.004, −0.001) for SDNN index, and −0.006 (−0.012, −0.001) for HF. Meanwhile, we also found that occupational noise exposure duration was significantly associated with lower expression of five miRNAs, when adjusting for other covariates. The β (95% CIs) were −0.039 (−0.067, −0.011) for miRNA-200c-3p, −0.053 (−0.083, −0.022) for miRNA-200a-3p, −0.044 (−0.070, −0.019) for miRNA-200b-3p, −0.032 (−0.048, −0.017) for miRNA-92a-3p, and −0.063 (−0.089, −0.038) for miRNA-21–5p in the continuous models. In addition, we found a positive association between miRNA-1-3p and LF (β = 0.039, 95% CI = 0.002, 0.080). Our study suggests that occupational noise exposure duration is associated with cardiac autonomic dysfunction, and the role of miRNAs in noise induced HRV reduction needs to be confirmed in future studies. [Display omitted] • Occupational noise exposure duration is associated with reduced SDNN, SDNN index, and HF. • Occupational noise exposure duration is associated with lower miR-200c-3p, miR-200a-3p, miR-200b-3p, miR-92a-3p, and miR-21–5p. • The role of miRNAs in noise induced HRV reduction needs to be confirmed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long-term noise exposure is reported to damage cardiovascular system, but the relationship between occupational noise exposure and arterial stiffness (AS) and the underlying mechanism is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the association of occupational noise exposure with arterial stiffness (AS), and further explore the mediation roles of microRNAs (miRNAs). A total of 838 workers were recruited from two companies in Wuhan, Hubei, China. Cumulative occupational noise exposure (CNE) was assessed through noise level of job title and work years in occupational noise. The AS for the participants were evaluated using brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) measured by an oscillometric device. Each 1-unit increase in CNE levels was significantly associated with a 0.002 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.001–0.003) unit increase in ln-transformed values of baPWV. In the sex-specific analysis, the association was significant in males (β = 0.002, 95%CI = 0.001–0.003). Meanwhile, the risk of bilateral hearing loss at high frequency was significantly higher in the high-exposed group than non-exposed group (OR = 1.895, 95%CI = 1.024–3.508), and participants with bilateral hearing loss at high frequency had a significantly higher level of ln-transformed baPWV (β = 0.032, 95%CI = 0.003–0.061). Occupational noise exposure and AS were both negatively associated with plasma miR-92a-3p and miR-21–5p, and the two miRNAs mediated 15.0% and 16.8% of the association of occupational noise with AS (P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that occupational noise exposure is positively associated with AS, and plasma miR-92a-3p and miR-21–5p may partly mediate such association. [Display omitted] • Occupational noise exposure is positively associated with arterial stiffness. • Bilateral high frequency hearing loss is positively associated with arterial stiffness. • Plasma miR-92a-3p and miR-21–5p mediated the association between occupational noise and arterial stiffness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]