Search

Immunochemical faecal occult blood tests have shown a greater sensitivity than guaiac test in colorectal cancer screening, but optimal number of samples and cutoff have still to be defined. The aim of this multicentric study was to evaluate the performance of immunochemical-based screening strategies according to different positivity thresholds (80, 100, 120 ng ml(-1)) and single vs double sampling (one, at least one, or both positive samples) using 1-day sample with cutoff at 100 ng ml(-1) as the reference strategy. A total of 20 596 subjects aged 50-69 years were enrolled from Italian population-based screening programmes. Positivity rate was 4.5% for reference strategy and 8.0 and 2.0% for the most sensitive and the most specific strategy, respectively. Cancer detection rate of reference strategy was 2.8 per thousand, and ranged between 2.1 and 3.4 per thousand in other strategies; reference strategy detected 15.6 per thousand advanced adenomas (range=10.0-22.5 per thousand). The number needed to scope to find a cancer or an advanced adenoma was lower than 2 (1.5-1.7) for the most specific strategies, whereas it was 2.4-2.7, according to different thresholds, for the most sensitive ones. Different strategies seem to have a greater impact on adenomas rather than on cancer detection rate. The study provides information when deciding screening protocols and to adapt them to local resources.

Aim: To report our experience with computed tomography colonography (CTC) systematically performed in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test (FOBT) and an incomplete colonoscopy in the setting of a population-based screening for colorectal cancer (CRC)., Methods: From April 2006 to April 2007, 43290 individuals (age range 50-70) who adhered to the regional screening program for the prevention of CRC underwent immunochemical FOBT. FOBT was positive in 1882 subjects (4.3%). 1463 (77.7%) of these subjects underwent colonoscopy, 903 performed in a single center. Of 903 colonoscopies 65 (7.2%) were incomplete. Forty-two of these subjects underwent CTC. CTC was performed with a 16-MDCT scanner after standard bowel prep (polyethyleneglycole) in both supine and prone position. Subjects whose CTC showed polyps or masses were referred to the endoscopist for repeat colonoscopy under sedation or underwent surgery. Per-lesion and per-segment positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated., Results: Twenty-one (50%) of 42 CTCs showed polyps or masses. Fifty-five of these subjects underwent a repeat colonoscopy, whereas 2 subjects underwent surgery for colonic masses of indeterminate nature. Four subjects refused further examinations. CTC correctly identified 2 colonic masses and 20 polyps. PPV for masses or polyps greater than 9 mm was of 87.5%. Per-lesion and per-segment PPV were, respectively, 83.3% and 83.3% for polyps greater or equal to 10 mm, and 77.8% and 85.7% for polyps of 6-9 mm., Conclusion: In the context of a screening program for CRC based on FOBT, CTC shows high per-segment and per-lesion PPV for colonic masses and polyps greater than 9 mm. Therefore, CTC has the potential to become a useful technique for evaluation of the non visualized part of the colon after incomplete colonoscopy.

We evaluated the sensitivity for colorectal cancer (CRC) of the latex agglutination test (LAT), an immunochemical test routinely used in the Florence District screening programme since 2000. Sensitivity was calculated by the proportional interval cancer incidence method in a population of 27,503 consecutive subjects screened in 2000-2002, interval cancers being identified by linkage to the Tuscany Cancer Registry files. Sensitivity was calculated overall and by gender, age, time since last negative LAT, CRC site, and rank of screening. Overall 1- and 2-year sensitivity estimates were 80.7 and 71.5%, respectively, suggesting that faecal occult blood testing screening sensitivity may be suboptimal due to testing or programme quality problems. Increasing screening sensitivity might be achieved if the detection rate of advanced adenomas could be increased without unacceptable loss in specificity.

Background: Gastric cancer may be suspected with otherwise unexplained positive faecal occult blood testing., Aims: To assess the frequency of gastric cancer following positive faecal occult blood testing and negative colonoscopy., Subjects: Age 40-74 cohort at first screening (1985-2001) with (a) faecal occult blood testing- (83,489), (b) faecal occult blood testing +/colonoscopy+ (2025), or faecal occult blood testing+/colonoscopy- (3555)., Methods: Gastric cancer incidence in faecal occult blood testing subsets, compared with expected standardized incidence rates., Results: Gastric cancer risk was increased (standardized incidence rate=146.7; 95% confidence interval: 105.8-203.4) in faecal occult blood testing+/colonoscopy- subjects. A four-fold excess incidence occurred during first year (observed cases=10, standardized incidence rate=408.3; 95% confidence interval: 219.7-758.8), irrespective of faecal occult blood testing type (guaiac, immunological). No excess risk occurred in faecal occult blood testing- (observed cases=53, standardized incidence rate=91.2; 95% confidence interval: 84.1-98.8) or in faecal occult blood testing+/colonoscopy+ subjects (observed cases=2, standardized incidence rate=101.9; 95% confidence interval: 25.5-407.4). Assuming a 100% 3-year study sensitivity for gastric cancer, faecal occult blood testing positive predictive value would be 0.4% (40-74 years) or 0.7% (> or =60 years) in faecal occult blood testing+/colonoscopy- subjects., Conclusions: Data suggest an association of faecal occult blood testing+/colonoscopy- and excess gastric cancer incidence in the following year. Due to low faecal occult blood testing+ positive predictive value, routine upper digestive tract endoscopy in these subjects is questionable.

We assessed the correlation between quantitative results of immunological faecal occult blood testing (I-FOBT) and colonic lesions (191 colorectal cancers, 890 adenomas) detected at colonoscopy in 2597 FOBT+ (cutoff 100 ng ml(-1) Hb) subjects. At univariate analysis, a higher average faecal Hb content was significantly associated with male gender (P=0.003), age (P=0.02), and colonoscopy findings (P=0.000). Among adenomas, higher faecal Hb content was significantly associated with size (P=0.0000), presence of severe dysplasia (P=0.0001), presence of villous component (P=0.0002), and location in the left colon (P=0.003). At multivariate analysis adjusting for potential confounders, age (P=0.03), size (P=0.0000), and location in the left colon (P=0.0005) were confirmed as having an independent association with higher faecal Hb content. Immunological FOBT is confirmed to be a specific screening test to detect cancer and adenoma, with a low positivity rate (3.7%) and a high positive predictive value (41.5%). Faecal Hb content is significantly higher for those lesions (cancer and high-risk adenomas) screening is aimed at detecting.