Search

Research question The definition of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) differs internationally. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) defines RPL as two or more pregnancy losses. Different definitions lead, however, to different approaches to care for couples with RPL. This study aimed to determine whether the distribution of RPL-associated factors was different in couples with two versus three or more pregnancy losses. If a similar distribution were found, couples with two pregnancy losses should be eligible for the same care pathway as couples with three pregnancy losses. Design This single-centre, retrospective cohort study investigated 383 couples included from 2012 to 2016 at the Leiden University Medical Center RPL clinic. Details on age, body mass index, smoking status, number of pregnancy losses, mean time to pregnancy loss and performed investigations were collected. The prevalence of uterine anomalies, antiphospholipid syndrome, hereditary thrombophilia, hyperhomocysteinaemia, chromosomal abnormalities and positive thyroid peroxidase antibodies were compared in couples with two versus three or more pregnancy losses. Results No associated factor was found in 71.5% of couples with RPL. This did not differ statistically between couples with two versus three or more pregnancy losses (73.6% versus 70.6%; P = 0.569). The distribution of investigated causes did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions As the distribution of associated factors in couples with two versus three or more pregnancy losses is equal, couples with two pregnancy losses should be eligible for the same care pathway as couples with three. This study supports ESHRE's suggestion of including two pregnancy losses in the definition of RPL.

INTRODUCTION: The cause of recurrent pregnancy loss often remains unknown. Possibly, pathophysiological pathways are shared with other pregnancy complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All women with secondary recurrent pregnancy loss (SRPL) visiting Leiden University Medical Center (January 2000-2015) were included in this retrospective cohort to assess whether women with SRPL have a more complicated first pregnancy compared with control women. SRPL was defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses before 22 weeks of gestation, with a previous birth. The control group consisted of all Dutch nullipara delivering a singleton (January 2000-2015). Information was obtained from the Dutch Perinatal Registry. Outcomes were preeclampsia, preterm birth, post-term birth, intrauterine growth restriction, breach position, induction of labor, cesarean section, congenital abnormalities, perinatal death and severe hemorrhage in the first ongoing pregnancy. Subgroup analyses were performed for women with idiopathic SRPL and for women ≤35 years. RESULTS: In all, 172 women with SRPL and 1 196 178 control women were included. Women with SRPL were older and had a higher body mass index; 29.7 years vs. 28.8 years and 25.1 kg/m2 vs. 24.1 kg/m2 , respectively. Women with SRPL more often had a post-term birth (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.10-3.17) and more perinatal deaths occurred in women with SRPL compared with the control group (OR 5.03, 95% CI 2.48-10.2). Similar results were found in both subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The first ongoing pregnancy of women with (idiopathic) SRPL is more often complicated by post-term birth and perinatal death. Revealing possible links between SRPL and these pregnancy complications might lead to a better understanding of underlying pathophysiology.