Search

Purpose: Decreasing popularity of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in bariatric-metabolic surgery may be due to higher perceived peri-operative complications. There are few studies on whether preoperative weight loss can reduce complications or reoperations following RYGB. We investigated this using a standardised operative technique., Materials and Methods: Retrospective single-centre study of RYGB from 2004 to 2019 using a prospective database. Preoperative behavioural management included intentional weight loss. Maximum preoperative weight, weight on the day of operation, and Obesity-Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS) class were recorded. Short-term outcomes (post-operative stay, 30-day complication and reoperation rates) were analysed., Results: In 2,067 RYGB patients (1,901 primary and 166 revisional), median preoperative total body weight loss (TWL) was 6.2% (IQR: 2.5-10.7%). The median age was 46 (interquartile range (IQR) 38-54) and 80.4% were female (n=1,661). For primary surgery, the median body mass index (BMI) was 47.6 kg/m 2 (IQR: 43.1-53.3). Excluding the 100-procedure learning curve, the complication rate for primary cases was 4.4% and reoperation rate of 2.8% and one peri-operative mortality (0.06%). OS-MRS ≥2 (class B or C) predicted higher risk of complications (6.1%) compared to those with a score <2 (class A) (3.8%, p=0.021), but not reoperations. Five percent preoperative TWL did not decrease complications compared to <5% TWL. Patients with ≥10% TWL had greater baseline risk and had an increased risk of complications (6.6% vs 3.7%, p=0.017) and reoperations (4.5% vs 2.7%, p<0.001)., Conclusions: RYGB performed using a standardised technique has low overall risk. The influence of preoperative weight loss on outcomes was inconsistent.

Background: Bariatric surgery is expanding and the increasing workload needs to be undertaken safely in new surgical centres with no previous bariatric experience. The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has a steep learning curve with documented high risk. We present the results for the first 300 cases of LRYGB in a new centre., Methods: Three hundred consecutive patients underwent LRYGB performed by a single surgeon. Four external surgeons mentored eight cases in the first 50. Demographic characteristics, body mass index (BMI) and operative time were collected prospectively and the Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score was used for risk stratification., Results: The mean BMI of the patients increased during the series from 49.0 for the first group to 50.2 for the second group and to 51.0 for the third group (p < 0.05). The number of high-risk patients measured with the OS-MRS was 19/300 (6.3%) in the whole series. The mean operative time decreased from 163 min for the first 100 patients to 119 min for the second 100 and 94 for the third (p < 0.0001). In the first group, there were nine reoperations and two conversions to open surgery, compared to two reoperations and one conversion in the second group (p < 0.05). In the whole series, there were 12 early complications requiring re-operation, four conversions to open surgery and one mortality (patient 110, heart failure within 24 h)., Conclusions: A mentoring process ensures that LRYGB can be done safely in a newly established bariatric centre. The operative time reduces markedly after the learning curve.