Search

We evaluated the effects of strabismus repair on fixational eye movements (FEMs) and stereopsis recovery in patients with fusion maldevelopment nystagmus (FMN) and patients without nystagmus. Twenty-one patients with strabismus, twelve with FMN and nine without nystagmus, were tested before and after strabismus repair. Eye-movements were recorded during a gaze-holding task under monocular viewing conditions. Fast (fixational saccades and quick phases of nystagmus) and slow (inter-saccadic drifts and slow phases of nystagmus) FEMs and bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) were analyzed in the viewing and non-viewing eye. Strabismus repair improved the angle of strabismus in subjects with and without FMN, however patients without nystagmus were more likely to have improvement in stereoacuity. The fixational saccade amplitudes and intersaccadic drift velocities in both eyes decreased after strabismus repair in subjects without nystagmus. The slow phase velocities were higher in patients with FMN compared to inter-saccadic drifts in patients without nystagmus. There was no change in the BCEA after surgery in either group. In patients without nystagmus, the improvement of the binocular function (stereopsis), as well as decreased fixational saccade amplitude and intersaccadic drift velocity, could be due, at least partially, to central adaptive mechanisms rendered possible by surgical realignment of the eyes. The absence of improvement in patients with FMN post strabismus repair likely suggests the lack of such adaptive mechanisms in patients with early onset infantile strabismus. Assessment of fixation eye movement characteristics can be a useful tool to predict functional improvement post strabismus repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of the study is to examine the association between amblyopia type and the presence of nystagmus on binocular and monocular functions of the fellow (FE) and amblyopic eye (AE). Methods: We recruited 19 controls and 44 amblyopes (anisometropes=13, strabismic=10, mixed=21). We measured visual, grating, and vernier acuities and high/low spatial frequency (SF) contrast sensitivities in each eye using a staircase method. Stereoacuity was measured with the Titmus fly test. We recorded fixation eye movements (FEM) using high-resolution video-oculography. Subjects were classified as having either no nystagmus (n=18), fusion maldevelopment nystagmus syndrome (FMNS) (n=12), or nystagmus without any structural anomalies that does not meet the criteria for FMNS or infantile nystagmus (n=14). Results: Analysis of visual function by clinical amblyopia type showed that patients with strabismus/mixed amblyopia (F (2,54)=9.5, p< 0.001) were more likely to have poor stereopsis while controlling for AE grating acuity deficit. The FE of patients with anisometropia had greater contrast sensitivity deficits at low (F (2,43)=4.4, p=0.018) and high SF (F (2,42)=10.1, p< 0.001). Analysis of visual function by FEM characteristics (low SF: (F (3,43)=4.3, p=0.010) and high SF: (F (3,42)=7.1, p=0.001) showed that the FE of patients with FMNS had worse low and high SF contrast sensitivities, whereas those without FMNS had greater contrast sensitivity deficits only at high SF compared to controls. Patients with FMNS (F (3,54) = 12.9, p< 0.001) were more likely to have poor stereopsis while controlling for AE grating acuity deficit compared to patients without FMNS. All amblyopic patients had worse high SF contrast sensitivity of the AE irrespective of type or FEM characteristics (Type = F (2,43)=8.8, p=0.001; FEM characteristics= F (3,43)=5.1, p=0.004). Conclusion: The presence of FMNS in patients with strabismic/mixed amblyopia is associated with poor/absent stereopsis. FE deficits vary across amblyopia type. Like FEM abnormalities, visual function deficits are seen in the FE of patients with and without nystagmus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We investigated how the abnormalities of fixation eye movements (FEMs) of the amblyopic eye were linked with treatment outcomes following part-time patching therapy in children with amblyopia. Methods: We recruited 53 patients, with at least 12 months of patching, and measured FEMs at the end of treatment. Subjects were classified based on FEM waveforms (those without nystagmus = 21, those with nystagmus without fusion maldevelopment nystagmus (FMN) = 21, and those with FMN = 11) and based on clinical type of amblyopia (anisometropic = 18, strabismic = 6, and mixed = 29). The treatment outcomes such as duration of treatment of receiving part-time patching therapy, visual acuity and stereo-acuity deficits at the end of treatment were determined. Bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA), fast (fixational saccade/quick phases), and slow (inter-saccadic drifts/slow phases) FEMs of the fellow and amblyopic eye were analyzed. Results: Anisometropic group had less residual amblyopia (0.23±0.19logMAR acuity) compared to strabismic/mixed (0.36±0.26) groups (p = 0.007). Treatment duration in patients without nystagmus was lower (12.6±9.5months) compared to nystagmus without FMN (25.6±23.2) and FMN (29.5±20.4) groups (p = 0.006). Patients without nystagmus had better stereopsis at the end of treatment (2.3±0.84logarcsecs) compared to nystagmus without FMN (2.6±0.84) group (p = 0.003). The majority of patients with FMN (8/11) had absent stereopsis. BCEA of the amblyopic eye was higher in patients with greater residual visual acuity deficits in patients without nystagmus. No such association was seen in Nystagmus no FMN and FMN groups. Increased amplitude of fast FEMs, increased eye position variance and eye velocity of slow FEMs were seen in patients who had received longer duration of part time patching therapy and in those with greater residual amblyopia, and poor stereopsis at the end of treatment. Conclusions: Assessment of FEM waveforms and fast and slow FEM characteristics are important measures while describing fixation instability in amblyopia. Several FEM abnormalities were associated with stereo-acuity and visual acuity deficits and treatment duration in patients with amblyopia treated with part time patching therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Visual function deficits are seen in amblyopic subjects during fellow and binocular viewing. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between Fixation Eye Movement (FEM) abnormalities and binocular contrast sensitivity and optotype acuity deficits in amblyopia. We recruited 10 controls and 25 amblyopic subjects [Anisometropic = 6, Strabismic = 10, Mixed = 9]. We measured binocular contrast sensitivity at spatial frequencies 1,2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 and binocular and monocular optotype acuity using a staircase procedure. We recorded FEMs using high-resolution video-oculography and classified subjects as having no nystagmus(None = 9) or nystagmus without FMN(n = 7) and with Fusion Maldevelopment Nystagmus (FMN)(n = 9). We computed the fixation instability, amplitude and velocity of the fast and slow FEMs. Amblyopic subjects with and without nystagmus had worse binocular contrast sensitivity at spatial frequencies 12 and 16 and binocular optotype acuity than controls. The abnormalities were most pronounced in amblyopic subjects with FMN. Fixation instability of the Fellow Eye and Amblyopic Eye and vergence instability, amplitude of fast FEMs and velocity of slow FEMs were increased with reduced binocular contrast sensitivity and reduced optotype acuity in amblyopic subjects. Fixation instability of Fellow Eye and Amblyopic Eye, optotype acuity and contrast sensitivity deficits are seen under binocular viewing in amblyopic subjects with and without nystagmus but are most pronounced in those with FMN. FEMs abnormalities correlate with both lower order (contrast sensitivity) and higher order (optotype acuity) visual function impairment in amblyopia. • Amblyopic subjects with and without nystagmus have optotype acuity and contrast sensitivity deficits than control subjects. • ·Binocular optotype acuity and contrast sensitivity deficits are more pronounced in subjects with FMN. • Fixation and vergence instability are more evident in those with greater binocular contrast and optotype acuity deficits. • Similarly, fast and slow FEMs are more abnormal in those with greater binocular contrast and optotype acuity deficits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reading is a vision-reliant task, requiring sequential eye movements. Binocularly discordant input results in visual sensory and oculomotor dysfunction in amblyopia, which may contribute to reading difficulties. This study aims to determine the contributions of fixation eye movement (FEM) abnormalities, clinical type and severity of amblyopia to reading performance under binocular and monocular viewing conditions. Twenty-three amblyopic patients and nine healthy controls were recruited. Eye movements elicited during fixation and reading of preselected passages were collected for each subject using infrared video-oculography. Subjects were classified as having no nystagmus (n = 9), fusion maldevelopment nystagmus (FMN, n = 5), or nystagmus without structural anomalies that does not meet criteria for FMN or infantile nystagmus (n = 9). Reading rate (words/min), the number of forward and regressive saccades (per 100 words) and fixation duration (s) were computed. Amblyopic patients with and without nystagmus exhibited greater vergence and fixation instability. In patients without nystagmus, the instability arises from increased amplitude and velocity of fast and slow FEMs respectively. Amblyopic patients with and without nystagmus exhibited lower reading speeds with increased fixation duration, regressive and progressive saccades than controls in all viewing conditions. Mixed etiology, greater amblyopic eye visual acuity and stereopsis deficits were associated with greater reading difficulties under binocular viewing. The presence of oculomotor dysfunction and the extent of visual acuity and stereoacuity deficits contribute to reading difficulties in patients with amblyopia, with and without nystagmus. The understanding of reading difficulties is essential to devise accommodations to limit long-term academic and vocational consequences of amblyopia. • Reading performance was altered in subjects with amblyopia. • Subjects with amblyopia showed increased vergence and fixation instability. • The instability was seen in amblyopic subjects with and without nystagmus. • Ocular motor dysfunction and severity of visual and stereoacuity deficits contribute to reading difficulties in amblyopia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]