Search

The novel banded one-anastomosis gastric bypass (B-OAGB) procedure has not previously been reported in super-obese patients over the long term. In this pilot study, outcomes in patients with a mean baseline body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) of ≥ 50 who underwent B-OAGB were evaluated through 5-year follow-up. Total weight loss (TWL), excess weight loss (EWL), BMI evolution, and changes in type 2 diabetes biomarkers were analyzed prospectively in super-obese patients who underwent B-OAGB. Paired samples t tests were used to assess weight outcome change from baseline through 5-year follow-up and 95% CIs were calculated. The Bariatric Outcomes and Reporting System (BAROS) was used to assess surgical success at 3 time points. Between October 2013 and February 2014, a 12-patient pilot cohort (mean baseline BMI 57.5 ± 6.3) underwent B-OAGB. No perioperative complications were observed within 30 days. Five-year mean BMI was 31.2 ± 5.4, a BMI loss of 25.9 (TWL 45.3 ± 7.5%; EWL 72.2 ± 12.8%). Between 11 and 24 months following surgery, 3 patients required band removal; each had one complication (1 stasis esophagitis and recurrent vomiting; 1 hypoalbuminemia; 1 anemia). There was no mortality. Long-term B-OAGB BAROS subscale and composite scores were comparable to other major bariatric procedures. In a pilot study of super-obese patients who underwent B-OAGB, excellent durable BMI loss of 25.9 kg/m2 (EWL 72.2%) at 5 years was achieved with an acceptable level of reoperation. More B-OAGB long-term follow-up studies are necessary to provide definitive conclusions regarding this combination bariatric procedure.

Objective Despite alarming prevalence rates, surprisingly little is known about neural mechanisms underlying eating behavior in juveniles with obesity. To simulate reactivity to modern food environments, event-related potentials (ERP) to appetizing food images (relative to control images) were recorded in adolescents with obesity and healthy adolescents. Methods Thirty-four adolescents with obesity (patients) and 24 matched healthy control adolescents watched and rated standardized food and object images during ERP recording. Personality (impulsivity) and eating styles (trait craving and dietary restraint) were assessed as potential moderators. Results Food relative to object images triggered larger early (P100) and late (P300) ERPs. More impulsive individuals had considerably larger food-specific P100 amplitudes in both groups. Controls with higher restraint scores showed reduced food-specific P300 amplitudes and subjective palatability ratings whereas patients with higher restraint scores showed increased P300 and palatability ratings. Conclusions This first ERP study in adolescents with obesity and controls revealed impulsivity as a general risk factor in the current obesogenic environment by increasing food-cue salience. Dietary restraint showed paradoxical effects in patients, making them more vulnerable to visual food-cues. Salutogenic therapeutic approaches that deemphasize strict dietary restraint and foster healthy food choice might reduce such paradoxical effects.

Background: The Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire was originally developed as a disease-specific instrument to measure postoperative outcomes of self-perceived quality of life (QoL) in obese patients. 5 key areas were examined: self-esteem, physical well-being, social relationships, work, and sexuality. Each of these questions offered 5 possible answers, which were given + or - points according to a scoring key. The questionnaire was used independently or incorporated into the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting System (BAROS). The instrument is simple, unbiased, user-friendly and can be completed in