Search

The health outcomes of very low birthweight (VLBW) infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) may be jeopardized when required nursing care is missed. This correlational study is the first to look at the association between missed nursing care and mortality, morbidity, and length of stay (LOS) for VLBW infants in a U.S. NICU sample. We used 2016 hospital administrative discharge abstracts for VLBW newborns ( n = 7,595) and NICU registered nurse survey responses ( n = 6,963) from the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators. The 190 sample hospitals were from 19 states in all regions. Missed clinical nursing care was significantly associated with higher odds of bloodstream infection and longer LOS, but not mortality or severe intraventricular hemorrhage. With further research, these results may motivate the development of interventions to reduce missed clinical nursing care in the NICU.

Aim: To document how changes in the hospital work environment and nurse staffing over time are associated with changes in missed nursing care., Background: Missed nursing care is considered an indicator of poorer care quality and has been associated with worse patient care experiences and health outcomes. Several systematic reviews of cross-sectional studies report that nurses in hospitals with supportive work environments and higher staffing miss less care. Causal evidence demonstrating these relationships is needed., Methods: This panel study utilized secondary data from 23,650 nurses surveyed in 2006 and 14,935 surveyed in 2016 in 458 hospitals from a four-state survey of random samples of licensed nurses., Results: Over the 10-year period, most hospitals exhibited improved work environments, better nurse staffing and more missed care. In hospitals with improved work environments or nurse staffing, the prevalence and frequency of missed care decreased significantly. The effect on missed care of changes in the work environment was greater than that of nurse staffing., Conclusions: Changes in the hospital work environment and staffing influence missed care., Implications for Nursing Management: Modifications in the work environment and staffing are strategies to mitigate care compromise. Nurse managers should investigate work settings in order to identify weaknesses., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Context: Infants born at very low birth weight (VLBW) require high levels of nursing intensity. The role of nursing in outcomes for these infants in the United States is not known., Objective: To examine the relationships between hospital recognition for nursing excellence (RNE) and VLBW infant outcomes., Design, Setting, and Patients: Cohort study of 72,235 inborn VLBW infants weighing 501 to 1500 g born in 558 Vermont Oxford Network hospital neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2008. Hospital RNE was determined from the American Nurses Credentialing Center. The RNE designation is awarded when nursing care achieves exemplary practice or leadership in 5 areas., Main Outcome Measures: Seven-day, 28-day, and hospital stay mortality; nosocomial infection, defined as an infection in blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture occurring more than 3 days after birth; and severe (grade 3 or 4) intraventricular hemorrhage., Results: Overall, the outcome rates were as follows: for 7-day mortality, 7.3% (5258/71,955); 28-day mortality, 10.4% (7450/71,953); hospital stay mortality, 12.9% (9278/71,936); severe intraventricular hemorrhage, 7.6% (4842/63,525); and infection, 17.9% (11,915/66,496). The 7-day mortality was 7.0% in RNE hospitals and 7.4% in non-RNE hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.99; P = .04). The 28-day mortality was 10.0% in RNE hospitals and 10.5% in non-RNE hospitals (adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.80-1.01; P = .08). Hospital stay mortality was 12.4% in RNE hospitals and 13.1% in non-RNE hospitals (adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-1.01; P = .06). Severe intraventricular hemorrhage was 7.2% in RNE hospitals and 7.8% in non-RNE hospitals (adjusted OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.00; P = .045). Infection was 16.7% in RNE hospitals and 18.3% in non-RNE hospitals (adjusted OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99; P = .04). Compared with RNE hospitals, the adjusted absolute decrease in risk of outcomes in RNE hospitals ranged from 0.9% to 2.1%. All 5 outcomes were jointly significant (P < .001). The mean effect across all 5 outcomes was OR, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.94; P < .001). In a subgroup of 68,253 infants with gestational age of 24 weeks or older, the ORs for RNE for all 3 mortality outcomes and infection were statistically significant., Conclusion: Among VLBW infants born in RNE hospitals compared with non-RNE hospitals, there was a significantly lower risk-adjusted rate of 7-day mortality, nosocomial infection, and severe intraventricular hemorrhage but not of 28-day mortality or hospital stay mortality.

Title: Variations in nursing care quality across hospitals., Aims: The aim of the study was to describe Registered Nurses' reports of unmet nursing care needs and examine the variation of nursing care quality across hospitals., Background: Large proportions of Registered Nurses have reported leaving necessary care activities undone because they lacked the time to complete the activities. Nursing care left undone can be expected to adversely affect the quality of care. However, little is known about the degree of variation in the quality of nursing care across hospitals., Methods: In 2008, a secondary analysis of a 1999 survey of Registered Nurses (n = 10,184) was conducted using descriptive and comparative statistics. Data were derived from inpatient staff nurses working in acute care hospital settings (n = 168). A hospital-level measure (i.e. unmet nursing care needs) of the quality of nursing care was developed from care needs left undone among all nurses., Results: Across hospitals there was a wide range in the proportion of Registered Nurses who reported leaving each nursing care need undone. They reported leaving two of seven necessary nursing care activities undone during their last shift. After controlling for nurses' demographic information, we found statistically significant variations in the quality of nursing care across hospitals., Conclusion: Differences in nursing care quality across hospitals appear to be closely associated with variations in the quality of care environments. Understanding the determinants of unmet nursing care needs can support policy decisions on systems and human resources management to enhance nurses' awareness of their care practices and the care environment.

Improvements in nurses' practice environments are essential to retain nurses and keep patients safe. The pace of improvements can accelerate if evidence is translated clearly for researchers, managers, and policymakers. This article evaluates the utility of published multidimensional instruments to measure the nursing practice environment. The assessment criteria are theoretical relevance, ease of use, and dissemination. This article also synthesizes the research that has used these instruments. Seven instruments and 54 studies are evaluated. The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) is proposed as the most useful instrument. Its content, length, and dissemination best satisfy the set of criteria. Researchers should use the PES-NWI to generate consistent and comparable evidence; expand the content to reflect all conceptual domains; develop a short form; test the instrument in different care settings; expand the evidence of the practice environment's influence on patient outcomes; and test interventions for practice environment improvements.

Objectives: This study sought to determine whether there were differences in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients' satisfaction with inpatient nursing care on dedicated AIDS units compared with conventional, multidiagnosis medical units., Methods: Interview data were collected from more than 600 consecutive AIDS admissions in 40 patient care units in 20 hospitals in 11 high AIDS incidence cities. Ten hospitals with dedicated AIDS units were matched with comparable hospitals treating AIDS patients on multidiagnosis medical units. AIDS patients' satisfaction with nursing care on dedicated AIDS units was compared with AIDS patients' satisfaction with care on scattered-bed units in the same hospital and with AIDS patients' satisfaction on scattered-bed units in different, matched hospitals without dedicated units. Interhospital differences that were not controlled by design were controlled statistically, as were differences in patient characteristics and illness severity., Results: Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients receiving care on dedicated AIDS units were significantly more satisfied with their nursing care. In hospitals with units of both types, dedicated AIDS units had a higher proportion of white patients, men, and homosexuals, whereas scattered-bed units had more minority patients and intravenous drug users. Controlling for these factors as well as for differences in illness severity and interhospital differences in patient satisfaction did not diminish the positive AIDS unit effect on patient satisfaction., Conclusions: Dedicated AIDS units achieve higher levels of satisfaction among patients with AIDS than general medical units. There is no evidence that patients feel isolated or stigmatized on dedicated AIDS units compared with patients on general units, and many patients have a clear preference for dedicated units.