Search

Background: With healthcare undergoing rapid digitalization, the effective integration of new technologies is crucial for nursing professionals, who form the largest group in the healthcare workforce. However, barriers within the nursing profession may impede digitalization efforts, leading to under utilization of available technologies and missed opportunities for enhancing healthcare quality and population health., Aims: This article aims to investigate the adoption and use of digital technologies by nurses, considering how key demographics, such as gender, age, and voluntariness of technology use, interact to influence their acceptance and utilization of these technologies., Methods: Employing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as a framework, we conducted a discursive exploration, supplemented by a literature review from diverse academic sources. Keywords related to UTAUT, digitalization, nursing practice and technology adoption were searched on PubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar. Additionally, UK government and professional regulator reports were examined to understand current recommendations concerning digital technologies in nursing practice and the profession's demography. Searches focused on moderating factor domains, and the last search was conducted on 26 April 2023., Results: The study revealed that the successful implementation of digital technologies in nursing practice requires a nuanced understanding of the nursing workforce's characteristics and preferences. Gender, age and voluntariness of technology use were found to intersect and influence nurses' acceptance and utilization of digital tools., Discussion: By applying UTAUT in the context of nursing, this study highlights the importance of tailored implementation strategies for digital technologies. A technologically deterministic perspective is insufficient; instead, consideration of social factors specific to nursing is essential for successful adoption., Conclusion: To maximize the benefits of digitalization in healthcare, it is imperative to address the barriers faced by nursing professionals. A comprehensive understanding of how key demographics impact technology adoption will inform targeted strategies, enhancing the engagement of nurses with digital tools and fostering innovation in healthcare practices. Further research and primary data are needed, but this study lays the foundation for future advancements in digital healthcare integration for nursing professionals., Relevance to Clinical Practice: The issues highlighted in this article are relevant to nurse leaders and those responsible for implementing technologies within nursing contexts. They are also relevant to technology developers who may benefit from considering the evidence associated with the moderating demographic factors highlighted in this article. Without a holistic approach to the implementation of technology, challenges associated with the use of digital technology by nurses are likely to persist. By considering the moderating demographic factors highlighted within the UTAUT (age, gender, voluntariness of use and experience) nurse leaders and technology developers may have greater success obtaining greater clinical outcomes from digital technology. This work was completed in 2022., No Patient or Public Contribution: Due to the focus of this article being one on professional challenges within the nursing profession, no involvement from patients or the public was sought., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Nurses and midwives should be able to perform, interpret and implement the results of clinical research to improve the quality of patient care. Increasing the research capacity and capability of healthcare professionals requires strong leadership and a strategic approach. This article describes how one NHS trust supports engagement of nurses and midwives in research through the development of a research strategy and a centre for nurse and midwife-led research.

Aims: The overall aim of this evaluation was to look at the impact of the changes in working practices during the pandemic on nurses. This secondary analysis provided an evaluation of virtual care and being able/required to work from home. Design: This was secondary analysis of an evaluation using semi‐structured interviews. Methods: Conducted at a single National Health Service (NHS) university hospital in the United Kingdom between May and July 2020. Forty‐eight operational leads and nurses participated in semi‐structured interviews which were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework analysis. Results: Two overarching themes emerged relating to the patient experience and nursing experience. There were both positive and negative elements associated with virtual care and remote working related to these themes. However, the majority of nurses found that virtual clinics were useful when proper resources were provided, and managerial strategies were put in place to support them. Participants felt that virtual care could benefit many but not all patient groups moving forward, and that flexibility around working from home would be desirable in the future. Conclusion: Virtual care and remote working were implemented to accommodate the restrictions imposed because of the pandemic. The benefits of these changes to nurses and patients support these being business as usual. However, clear policies are needed to ensure that nurses feel supported when working remotely and there are robust assessments in place to ensure virtual care is provided to patients who have access to the necessary technology. Impact: This was a study of the move to virtual care and remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Telemedicine and flexible working were not common in the NHS prior to the pandemic but the current evaluation supports the role out of these as standard care with policies in place to ensure that nurses and patients are appropriately supported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives: To understand the social construction of frontline nurse leadership and how power operates at this level. Background: It is argued that frontline nurse leaders are central to the negotiation of care. Evidence suggests they feel ill‐equipped to lead and lack confidence in their ability to do so. Disempowerment has been proposed as a barrier to effective ward leadership. There is a lack of studies about daily frontline leadership practice. Design: Single instrumental case study with embedded cases. Methods: A purposive sample of one acute National Health Service Trust, with a convenience sample of embedded cases, was selected. Multiple methods of data collection were used including semi‐structured interviews, nonparticipant observations, field notes and documentary evidence. Thematic analysis using constant comparison and categorisation of data within, between and across cases was used to generate a theory of ward leadership in its organisational context. COREQ Checklist compliant. Results: These findings suggest the frontline nurse leaders' power is a dynamic and situation‐dependent phenomenon that shapes and is shaped by ongoing interactions between stakeholders in the NHS. In these interactions, power ebbs and flows. These leaders, like all actors involved, were paradoxically both powerful and powerless at the same time. Conclusion: This study offers a new contribution to the discussion about the power of ward leaders and problematises the theoretical assumptions that perpetuate calls for increased power. Relevance to practice: In their efforts to resolve the spontaneous dilemmas that arise in practice, frontline nurse leaders would benefit from regularly participating in communities of reflexive practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Design Methods Data Sources Findings Conclusion Implications for the profession and/or patient care Impact Reporting Method Patient or Public Contribution To review the current nursing and midwifery contribution to leading digital health (DH) policy and practice and what facilitates and/or challenges this.Integrative literature review.Pre‐defined inclusion criteria were used. Study selection and quality assessment using the appropriate critical appraisal tools were undertaken by two authors, followed by narrative synthesis.Six databases and hand searching for papers published from 2012 to February 2024.Four themes were identified from 24 included papers. These are discussed according to the World Health Organization's Global Strategic Directions for Nursing and Midwifery and indicate nurses/midwives are leading DH policy and practice, but this is not widespread or systematically enabled.Nurses and midwives are ideally placed to help improve health outcomes through digital healthcare transformation, but their policy leadership potential is underused.Nurses/midwives' DH leadership must be optimized to realize maximum benefit from digital transformation. A robust infrastructure enabling nursing/midwifery DH policy leadership is urgently needed.This study addresses the lack of nursing/midwifery voice in international DH policy leadership. It offers nurses/midwives and health policymakers internationally opportunity to: drive better understanding of nursing/midwifery leadership in a DH policy context; enhance population outcomes by optimizing their contribution; Develop a robust infrastructure to enable this.Reporting adheres to the EQUATOR network, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.No patient or public contribution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]