Search

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is crucial in keeping nurses aware of the current knowledge and improving clinical decision-making. The integration of nurses’ EBP competencies and organizational support has been suggested to create an effective arena in implementing EBP. The purpose of the study was to examine organizational factors influencing nurses’ EBP knowledge, attitudes, and implementation and identify staff nurses’ perceptions of EBP nursing leadership and hospital supports in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from a convenience sample of staff nurses (N = 227) working in four hospitals using a cross-sectional, correlational descriptive design. Level of education (p < 0.05), EBP training (p < 0.05), unit type (ICU (p < 0.001) and ER (p < 0.01)), perceived nursing leadership (p < 0.001), and work environment (p < 0.05) supports were found significantly associated with nurses’ knowledge. Magnet recognition (p < 0.01) and knowledge (p < 0.001) had significant influence on nurses’ attitudes. Unit type (ER) (p < 0.05), knowledge (p < 0.001), and attitudes (p < 0.001) were associated with implementation. Encouragement to attend EBP trainings from nursing leadership was perceived by most nurses (51.1%). Nurses reported their hospitals support EBP through training (68.2%). Findings support the need for healthcare systems to create a culture that facilitates EBP implementation to enhance nurses’ EBP competencies and improve patients’ outcomes. Nursing managers may consider preparing nurses through education.

Aim: To assess the prevalence of minor and serious cyberloafing behaviours among nurses and examine the impact of the nursing stressors on nurses' cyberloafing behaviours. Background: Cyberloafing could have a negative influence on employees' job performance, but it also has been argued that it could serve as a coping mechanism to deal with stressful work environments. Design: A cross‐sectional descriptive, correlational design. Methods: Data were collected between September and December 2020 from a convenience sample of staff nurses (N = 291) providing care at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Sample characteristics, nursing stressors and cyberloafing behaviours information were collected using self‐reported questionnaires. Descriptive, bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Findings Nurses in Saudi Arabia exhibited low levels of minor and serious cyberloafing behaviours. However, they engaged more frequently in minor cyberloafing behaviours more than serious cyberloafing behaviours. Stressors and Internet usage frequency influenced the frequency of minor and serious cyberloafing behaviours. Level of education and nationality impacted serious cyberloafing behaviours only. Conclusion: Nursing stressors were associated with cyberloafing behaviours. Other studies on cyberloafing and job stress yielded inconsistent results. Efforts should be taken to avoid the adverse effects of cyberloafing by establishing a clear policy on using the advanced technology for non‐work purposes. Summary statement: What is already known about this topic? Job characteristics and stress have been linked to increased cyberloafing behaviours among employees.Cyberloafing can serve as a coping mechanism to deal with stressful work environment.No studies have been conducted to describe the association between nursing stressors and cyberloafing behaviours. What this paper adds? Nurses in Saudi Arabia exhibited low levels of cyberloafing behaviours.The frequency of minor and serious cyberloafing behaviours among nurses is influenced by their stress and Internet usage frequency.Nurses' level of education and nationality impacted serious cyberloafing behaviours only. The implications of this paper Efforts should be taken to minimize the impact of nursing stressors by creating a healthy work environment and promoting nursing practice.Establishing a clear policy regarding using the Internet and advanced technology for non‐work purposes is essential to avoid the adverse effects of cyberloafing.Providing education for nurses on cyberloafing associated risks might reduce the amount of cyberloafing during working hours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Increased stressors and decreased job satisfaction are major challenges in nursing. Important factors of better professional quality of life include compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. It is critical to assess these factors to help improve nurses' clinical practices. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationships between the three factors and associated factors. Methods: A cross-sectional, multisite study was conducted on a convenience sample of 464 nurses working at three public hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The Professional Quality of Life Version 5 was used to collect data. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were run using SPSS. Results: Scores were slightly moderate on the compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress levels. Compassion satisfaction was statistically significantly and negatively associated with burnout. A statistically significant relationship was reported between compassion satisfaction and secondary traumatic stress. Further, there was a statistically significant association between burnout and secondary traumatic stress. In regression, only the secondary traumatic stress model was statistically significant. Conclusions: Nurse managers should use highly standard guidelines to reduce secondary traumatic stress levels. Further actions addressing potential issues for improving compassion satisfaction and reducing burnout levels among nurses are also recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim and Objectives: To examine the influence of staff nurses' individual factors on knowledge, attitudes and implementation of evidence‐based practice in Saudi Arabia and to identify facilitators and barriers to evidence‐based practice implementation. Background: Evidence‐based practice has been considered as a key for healthcare quality measure. The literature, however, shows that nurses worldwide are not implementing evidence‐based practice as expected and recommended by governing agencies. In Saudi Arabia, evidence‐based practice implementation has not been addressed sufficiently. Design: A cross‐sectional, correlational design was used. We have complied with the guidelines of STROBE Checklist in presenting this research. A convenience sample of staff nurses (n = 227) was selected from four hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The survey questions included the Evidence‐based Practice Questionnaire and individual factors. Data were analysed using multiple linear regression models. Results: Attitudes towards evidence‐based practice had the highest mean followed by evidence‐based practice knowledge and implementation means. Evidence‐based practice training and research involvement were associated with knowledge in the bivariate and multivariate analyses. None of the individual factors were associated with attitudes. However, knowledge was associated with attitudes. Knowledge and attitudes influenced evidence‐based practice implementation positively. Unexpectedly, receiving evidence‐based practice training made it more difficult for nurses to participate in evidence‐based practice implementation process. We found that attitudes partially mediated the relationship between knowledge and evidence‐based practice implementation. Conclusion: Nurses in Saudi Arabia are willing to be involved in the evidence‐based practice process. However, nurses identified that they need to improve their knowledge and skills in order to be active participants in the process. Relevance to clinical practice: Organisations and nursing leadership may benefit from developing a comprehensive strategy to promote staff nurses' involvement in the evidence‐based practice process through providing continuing education and mentoring programmes about evidence‐based practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To explore factors associated with frequency of performing pressure injury prevention measures among a sample of intensive care units' nurses. Pressure injuries may be unavoidable in specific circumstances; however, most pressure injuries may be considered preventable. Nursing actions at the point of care play a significant role in shaping pressure injury prevention. A cross-sectional, descriptive correlational design was used. Using convenience sampling method, 162 intensive care units' nurses were recruited from three hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The participants completed a survey that included Nurses' Practice of Pressure Ulcer Prevention Questionnaire, Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool, Attitude toward Pressure Ulcer Prevention, Pressure Ulcer Prevention Barriers instrument, and Intention to Use Pressure Injury Preventive Measures instrument. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Nurses lack of knowledge about pressure injury preventions. However, they possessed positive attitudes toward pressure injury preventions. Nurses faced some barriers to prevent pressure injuries. Most nurses agreed that there was social pressure to prevent pressure injury. They had an intention to use preventive measures to prevent pressure injury. Nurses performed pressure injury prevention frequently. The bivariate and multivariate analyses showed only barriers to prevent pressure injury were negatively associated with frequency of performing pressure injury prevention. Several factors that may influence ICU nurses' behavior to perform PIPs have been identified. The participants reflected positive attitude, positive social pressure, and intention to perform PIPs. Nevertheless, they need to improve their knowledge of PIPs and reduce the barriers prevented them from performing PIPs. • Nurses in Saudi Arabia lack of knowledge about pressure injury preventions. • Nurses' attitudes toward pressure injury preventions were positive. • Most nurses indicated that there was social pressure to prevent pressure injury. • Nurses performed pressure injury prevention frequently. • Barriers were negatively associated with performing pressure injury prevention frequency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]